01 SEPTEMBER 2014 - CERTIFIED ISSUE - REV C€¦ · AEE PLAN- MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE - 1:500@A3 Design development Rationale 1. Improves constructibility 2. Lack of abutment information

Appendix 3: BRIDGE SUMMARY- MAZENGARB BRIDGE

Site Specific Management Plan 004 - [Sectors 420]MacKays to Peka Peka Expressway

01 SEPTEMBER 2014 - CERTIFIED ISSUE - REV C

1

Bridges as a series of components Proposed Mazengarb exploded isometric

M2PP Bridge Design Objectives

Design Objectives

With reference to the Urban and Landscape Design Framework (Technical Report 5) (ULDF) there are four design objectives for the bridges and their respective contexts. These four objectives are overarching aims for the project and have been extracted from the Design Concept statements in two sections of the ULDF: Local Road Interface Design (section 5.7) and Bridge Design (section 5.8).

The purpose of extracting these objectives is to enable any changes to bridge structures and their context made through the concept and detailed design process to be considered at the highest level of the design intent. There are design principles in each of the sections as noted above and these too form a basis for considering the development of the designs for the bridges and their context.

As is typical in a design evaluation process, any aspects of design that do not align with the design principles would be elevated to consideration against the design objectives.

Design Objectives:

1. The public spaces of the roads and streets take primacy over the experience of the Expressway users. Local people will be making slower movements and as a consequence the bridges will be more visually apparent to them than to people travelling along the Expressway

2. As a new element in the landscape, the bridges respect the surrounding landscape and are expressed in terms of their horizontality, fluidity and simplicity because the landscape is relatively low key and low in scale; having several ‘feature’ bridges would become both visually complex and overwhelming in scale. 3. Bridges are formed as a whole from a single kit of parts, which allows the components to be repeated and a similar approach used at the multiple crossings to register as a ‘family’ of bridges because people will have multiple interactions day to day with the Expressway and this approach promotes simplicity and visual continuity.

4. Utilise concrete prefabricated parts because this allows fine levels of quality control, cost benefits and significant improvements in construction time at the crossings and reduces disturbance to the area.

43

44

32

2710

0mm

EXPRESSWAY NORTHBOUND

EXPRESSWAY SOUTHBOUND

22900mm

MA

ZEN

GA

RBRO

AD

CONCRETE BRIDGE BARRIER/FASCIA PANEL SHOWN YELLOW - REFER TO SSMP FOR FINISHES

PROVISION FOR FUTURE FOOTPATH SHOWN DASHED - 2000mm MIN

PROPOSED FOOTPATH SHOWN HATCHED. TO TIE IN WITH

EXISTING

FOOTPATH SHOWN HATCHED

BRIDGE/EXPRESSWAY BARRIER- BY OTHERS

EXPRESSWAY BARRIER- BY OTHERS


NOISE WALL - TYPE NB22m HIGH. REFER TO SSMP FOR NOISE WALL TYPE AND FINISHES


CONCRETE ABUTMENT WING WALLS. EASTERN WING WALLS ROTATED OUT 10 DEGREES TO IMPROVE SIGHTLINES - REFER TO SSMP FOR FINISHES


PLANTED NOISE BUND

CONCRETE BRIDGE BARRIER/FASCIA PANEL SHOWN YELLOW M

AZE

NG

ARB

RO

AD

APPROACH SLAB EXTENT

CONCRETE STRUCTURAL ABUTMENT


41

42

31


EXPRESSWAY SOUTHBOUND 2700

0mm

23000mm

3° SKEW

43

44

32

2710

0mm


EXPRESSWAY SOUTHBOUND

22900mm

MA

ZEN

GA

RBRO

AD

CONCRETE BRIDGE BARRIER/FASCIA PANEL SHOWN YELLOW - REFER TO SSMP FOR FINISHES

PROVISION FOR FUTURE FOOTPATH SHOWN DASHED - 2000mm MIN

PROPOSED FOOTPATH SHOWN HATCHED. TO TIE IN WITH

EXISTING

FOOTPATH SHOWN HATCHED

BRIDGE/EXPRESSWAY BARRIER- BY OTHERS







PLANTED NOISE BUND

CONCRETE BRIDGE BARRIER/FASCIA PANEL SHOWN YELLOW MA

ZEN

GA

RB

ROA

D

APPROACH SLAB EXTENT



41

42

31


EXPRESSWAY SOUTHBOUND 2700

0mm

23000mm

3° SKEW

2AEE Consented to DET Proposed Graphic Comparison

PROPOSED PLAN- MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE - 1:500@A3

AEE PLAN- MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE - 1:500@A3

Design development Rationale1. Improves constructibility2. Lack of abutment information in AEE phase. The bridge abutments tie in with and retain the proposed embankments. The abutment wing walls are designed as one long continuous element, they lead pedestrians though and under the bridge

connecting one side to the other.3. Provided for reference only. Refer to SSMP for more detail and finishes4. No existing footpath to tie in to on the northern side. Space provision for future footpath.

1. Reduced bridge skew. From 3º to 0°2. More detail provided for abutment treatment3. Extent of noise walls shown4. No footpath constructed on the northern side of Mazengarb Road

23000mm

MAZENGARB ROAD


MSE EMBANKMENT

CONCRETE BARRIER 1100 HIGH

EXISTING GROUND 2100mm FOOTPATH

2200mm FOOTPATH

PROVISION FOR A FOOTPATH ON THE NORTH SIDE ON

MAZENGARB RD 2000mm MIN

ROAD CLEARANCE VARIES 5100mm MIN

22900mm

CONCRETE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE ABUTMENT - BY OTHERS


CONCRETE STRIP DRAIN TO BACK OF ABUTMENT PANELS - BY OTHERS

STRUCTURAL WING WALL SHOWN DASHED BEYOND

CLEAR CORRIDOR 20600mm

MAZENGARB ROAD 1000mm

2500mm


4900mm

EMBANKMENTS PLANTED WITH MIXED NATIVE MASSED PLANTING. REFER TO SSMP

CONCRETE BRIDGE BARRIER - REFER TO SSMP FOR FINISH

23000mm

MAZENGARB ROAD


MSE EMBANKMENT


EXISTING GROUND 2100mm FOOTPATH

2200mm FOOTPATH

PROVISION FOR A FOOTPATH ON THE NORTH SIDE ON

MAZENGARB RD 2000mm MIN

ROAD CLEARANCE VARIES 5100mm MIN

22900mm

CONCRETE STRUCTURAL BRIDGE ABUTMENT - BY OTHERS


CONCRETE STRIP DRAIN TO BACK OF ABUTMENT PANELS - BY OTHERS

STRUCTURAL WING WALL SHOWN DASHED BEYOND


MAZENGARB ROAD 1000mm

2500mm


4900mm

EMBANKMENTS PLANTED WITH MIXED NATIVE MASSED PLANTING. REFER TO SSMP

CONCRETE BRIDGE BARRIER - REFER TO SSMP FOR FINISH


1. AEE ELEVATION - MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE EAST ELEVATION - 1:250@A3

2. PROPOSED ELEVATION - MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE EAST ELEVATION - 1:250@A3

Design development Rationale

1. Lack of abutment information in AEE phase. The bridge abutments tie in with and retain the proposed embankments. The abutment wing walls are designed as one long continuous element, they lead pedestrians though and under the bridge

connecting one side to the other. 2. No existing footpath to tie in to on the northern side. Space provision for future footpath.

1. More detail provided for abutment treatment2. No footpath constructed on the northern side of Mazengarb Road

HOLLOW CORE BEAMSSURFACING

SURFACING

CONCRETE CROSS HEAD BEAM

SURFACING



STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ABUTMENT

MSE BLOCK

EXISTING GROUND LINE

PROPOSED GROUND LINE

1691mm

3450

mm

VARI

ES 5

100m

m M

IN

VARI

ES 5

100m

m M

IN

2100mm

12400mm 12400mm2200mm

HOLLOW CORE BEAMS

27100mm SOUTH WEST WING WALL 13300mm

12100mm12100mm 2900mm

27100mm


2300mm

27000mm27000mm

1100mm UPSTAND

CONC. BARRIER WITH STEEL HANDRAIL. REFER TO SSMP FOR PROPOSED FINISH

SURFACING

HOLLOW CORE BEAMS


CONCRETE STRUCTURAL ABUTMENT PRE-CAST CONC. PANEL. REFER TO

SSMP FOR PROPOSED FINISHEMBANKMENT LEVEL AT THE BACK OF PANEL SHOWN DASHED BEYOND

EMBANKMENTS PLANTED WITH MIXED NATIVE

MASSED PLANTING. REFER TO SSMP

CONC. EXPRESSWAY BARRIER - BY OTHERS

PROPOSED GROUND

TOE WALL. REFER TO SSMP FOR PROPOSED FINISH


SURFACING


SURFACING




MSE BLOCK



1691mm

3450

mm

VARI

ES 5

100m

m M

IN

VARI

ES 5

100m

m M

IN

2100mm

12400mm 12400mm2200mm

HOLLOW CORE BEAMS


12100mm12100mm 2900mm

27100mm


2300mm

27000mm27000mm

1100mm UPSTAND


SURFACING

HOLLOW CORE BEAMS







PROPOSED GROUND



SURFACING


SURFACING




MSE BLOCK



1691mm

3450

mm

VARI

ES 5

100m

m M

IN

VARI

ES 5

100m

m M

IN

2100mm

12400mm 12400mm2200mm

HOLLOW CORE BEAMS


12100mm12100mm 2900mm

27100mm


2300mm

27000mm27000mm

1100mm UPSTAND


SURFACING

HOLLOW CORE BEAMS







PROPOSED GROUND



3. PROPOSED SECTIONAL ELEVATION - MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE NORTH ABUTMENT - 1:200@A3

1. AEE SECTIONAL ELEVATION - MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE NORTH ABUTMENT - 1:200@A3 2. AEE SECTIONAL ELEVATION -MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE (LOOKING NORTH) - 1:200@A3

4. PROPOSED SECTIONAL ELEVATION - MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE (LOOKING NORTH) - 1:200@A3

Design development Rationale

1. Lack of abutment information in AEE phase. The bridge abutments tie in with and retain the proposed embankments. The abutment wing walls are designed as one long continuous element, they lead pedestrians though and under the bridge

connecting one side to the other.2. Increase width of light shaft.

1. More information provided for the bridge abutment2. Bridge concrete fascia panels removed from the inside of the bridge


AEE VISUALISATION - MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE (NORTH WEST SIDE OF MAZENGARB LOOKING SOUTH EAST)

PROPOSED VISUALISATION - MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE (NORTH WEST SIDE OF MAZENGARB LOOKING SOUTH EAST)

6Bridge Development Matrix

Elements AEE Design Current Design Developments Why? ULDF Principles

PRE-CAST CONC. PANEL. REFER TO SSMP FOR PROPOSED FINISH

CONCRETE STRUCTURAL ABUTMENT AND WING WALL

CONC. BRIDGE BARRIER

CONC. BRIDGE BARRIER1000mm

2300mm

1100mm

HOLLOW CORE CONCRETE BEAMS


2100mm

820mm

1100mm

PROPOSED GROUND LEVEL

EXISTING GROUND LEVEL


STEEL H-PILES

MSE (MECHANICALLY STABILISED EARTH)

BLOCK

UPSTAND1100mm 1100mm

VARIES 1000mm

70 DEG

DISH/V-CHANNEL DRAIN TO THE BACK OF

ABUTMENT WING WALL

STRUCTURAL WING WALL SHOWN DASHED

BEYOND

CONCRETEABUTMENT

2500mm

500mm

1750mm

1 2

CONC. BARRIER WITH STEEL HANDRAIL. REFER TO SSMP FOR PROPOSED FINISHCONC. STRUCTURAL ABUTMENT


SURFACINGSURFACING

VARIES 5100m

m M

IN

4900mm

AbutmentElevation1:100@A3

Cross Head & barrier

junction1:100@A3





2300mm

1100mm



2100mm

820mm

1100mm




STEEL H-PILES


BLOCK


VARIES 1000mm

70 DEG


ABUTMENT WING WALL


BEYOND

CONCRETEABUTMENT

2500mm

500mm

1750mm

1 2



SURFACINGSURFACING

VARIES 5100m

m M

IN

4900mm





2300mm

1100mm



2100mm

820mm

1100mm




STEEL H-PILES


BLOCK


VARIES 1000mm

70 DEG


ABUTMENT WING WALL


BEYOND

CONCRETEABUTMENT

2500mm

500mm

1750mm

1 2



SURFACINGSURFACING

VARIES 5100m

m M

IN

4900mm





2300mm

1100mm



2100mm

820mm

1100mm




STEEL H-PILES


BLOCK


VARIES 1000mm

70 DEG


ABUTMENT WING WALL


BEYOND

CONCRETEABUTMENT

2500mm

500mm

1750mm

1 2



SURFACINGSURFACING

VARIES 5100m

m M

IN

4900mm

1. Handrail shown on top of barrier

2. Bridge fascia panel height increased

1. Lack of abutment information in AEE phase. The bridge abutments tie in with and retain the proposed embankments. The abutment wing walls are designed as one long continuous element, they lead pedestrians though and under the bridge connecting one side to the other.

2. To be consistent with the proposed Otaihanga Road bridge, improve sightlines.

3. Missing from AEE. Safety requirement for cyclists using the expressway

1. Missing from AEE. Safety requirement for cyclists using the expressway.

2. Increase to the bridge deck depth.

1. Please refer to ULDF principles summary on sheet; 7 of this document. With particular reference to principle number; 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 11 and 13

1. Please refer to ULDF principles summary on sheet; 7 of this document. With particular reference to principle number 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 13

1. More information provided for the bridge abutment

2. Spill through abutment angel reduced.

3. Handrail shown on top of barrier

7ULDF PRINCIPLES SUMMARY

ULDF principle Assessment of ULDF principles 1. Make the bridges generally consistent in their form so they

register as a ‘family’ and provide some visual continuity within the local environment

Proposed bridge form remains consistent with and has become even more so as there is less variation in bridge types from that shown in AEE. Accordingly there is enhanced consistency in the local environment.

2. Express the bridges as simple forms that sit across the changes in landscape and are not seen as strong statement in their own right

Proposed bridge form remains as in AEE. Mazengarb bridge is a visually simple structure that sits across the landscape as an horizontal element.

3. Unite the bridge elements of pier, cross head, deck and barrier as one sculptural form and ensure services are concealed from view

Proposed bridge form remains as in the AEE – has no piers and the form is generally consistent with other bridge forms – will appear as part of same family given the barrier/fascia panel form. There are no services elements or other extraneous protrusions below the bottom of the bridge fascia panels

4. Ensure the form of the bridges from the underside is visually appealing to recognise the primacy of the local roads user’s experience in design consideration

Proposed bridge remains as in AEE. The abutment design leads the local road users (Pedestrian and vehicular) up to, beneath and then beyond the bridge space.

5. Design the intersection of the piers with the ground in concert with the local road interface design of abutment forms and materials (refer to local road interface design principles)

Proposed bridge remains as in AEE with no piers. The abutment form has been developed to better tie in with the proposed earthworks surrounding the bridge. The abutments provide for required sight lines for local road crossings by cyclists and walkers.

6. Light the spaces beneath local road over bridges to enhance the quality of the space including the use of natural light penetration where the local road has a higher frequency of pedestrian cycling and other non-vehicular users

There is lighting to be provided under the bridge to recognise the relatively high level of usage by cyclists, walkers and others. This lighting can be used to enhance the architectural forms. The split in the bridge deck, sloping abutment and no piers means there is some natural light penetration to the space beneath the bridge.

7. Use architectural lighting to emphasise the sculptural forms of the bridges and light units that are readily serviceable from the ground

Proposed bridge will be lit from beneath and objective will be to light the underside of the bridge deck

8. Utilise the opportunity provided by multiple bridges to make a system of parts that can be repeated at each location and improve efficiency of construction

Proposed bridge, as in the AEE, remains of the same systematised approach to allow repetition at other locations and improves the efficiency of construction.

9. Use textured finishes within the bridge elements surfaces’ to provide a crafted finish – avoid printed forms

The proposed finish on the Mazengarb Road Bridge fascia panels will be fair faced concrete with a white wash, applied concrete coating to ensure colour and tonal uniformity between panels. The bridge abutment will be con-structed with precast concrete panels with an inlaid Otaki pebble finish. The underside of the deck will be fair faced concrete without the applied white wash coating to help make these elements visually recessive relative to the barrier. Matt graffiti protection to be applied to all bridge elements surfaces. Refer to the SSMP for further detail on the proposed finishes.

10. Repeat the bridge design concepts within the design of pedestrians bridges recognising that these may be able to utilise lighter weight materials

Not relevant

11. Develop each bridge crossing design considering the piers types best suited to the location

Not relevant

12. Locate bridge piers associated with bridge watercourse crossings away from riparian edges to prevent need to armour stream edges

Not relevant

13. Ensure that the integrity and significance of the bridge forms as important to the amenity of the community is not accorded any less priority than the other design requirements of the project

Proposed bridge form at Mazengarb Road has seen the consideration of all the contributing factors of visual amenity, safe CWB crossing, structural design in high seismic zone, and constructibility.

8MAZENGARB ROAD CROSSING - SIMULATION

Documents

01 SEPTEMBER 2014 - CERTIFIED ISSUE - REV C€¦ · AEE PLAN- MAZENGARB ROAD BRIDGE - 1:500@A3 Design development Rationale 1. Improves constructibility 2. Lack of abutment information