0305-4470_24_22_010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 0305-4470_24_22_010

    1/7

    Analytical solution of the Schrodinger equation with linear confinement potential

    This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article.

    1991 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24 5267

    (http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4470/24/22/010)

    Download details:

    IP Address: 200.20.9.77

    The article was downloaded on 19/06/2012 at 17:44

    Please note that terms and conditions apply.

    View the table of contents for this issue, or go to thejournal homepagefor more

    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience

    http://iopscience.iop.org/page/termshttp://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4470/24/22http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4470http://iopscience.iop.org/http://iopscience.iop.org/searchhttp://iopscience.iop.org/collectionshttp://iopscience.iop.org/journalshttp://iopscience.iop.org/page/aboutioppublishinghttp://iopscience.iop.org/contacthttp://iopscience.iop.org/myiopsciencehttp://iopscience.iop.org/myiopsciencehttp://iopscience.iop.org/contacthttp://iopscience.iop.org/page/aboutioppublishinghttp://iopscience.iop.org/journalshttp://iopscience.iop.org/collectionshttp://iopscience.iop.org/searchhttp://iopscience.iop.org/http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4470http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4470/24/22http://iopscience.iop.org/page/terms
  • 7/27/2019 0305-4470_24_22_010

    2/7

    I Phyr A Math Gen. 24 (1991) 5267-5272 Pnnted :n the U K

    Received 26 Apni 1941, in find form 15 July 1991

    Abrhnct. It IS shann *.at the Schrodinger equation m ath xnear confineme nt potenoal hasan anaiytical sdut'or, The ex*stenceof rhe analyti~al olutmn require

  • 7/27/2019 0305-4470_24_22_010

    3/7

    5268 H Tezuka2. Deduct ion of recurrence ~ Q Z E B U R ~ P ZSpherical symmetric Schradinger equation for a particle *,th mass m and orbitalangular momentum 1 is given by

    ( 2 . 1 )where R ( r ) is the radial part of the wavefunction MP);

    *(~)=R(r)Y?(fl) . ( 2 . 2 )The energy eigenvalue E of the particir is determined by solving ( 2 1).

    For the spherical symmetricpotential U( I ) , let us consider the confinement potentialwhich is made of a long range linear potential and a short range Coulomb typepotential [4]:

    ( 2 . 3bU ( r ) =ar-- PConstants Q and b are independent ofdistance r, and their values are determined byexperiments so as to reproduce proper physical values of the hadrons. Then equation(2.1) is rewritten as

    At large r, equation (2.4) becomes

    where

    If W L require the term proportionai to r after double difierentiatton, u ( r ) must havethe form exp(-r3") and for the constant term, u ( r ) must have the form exp(-r). Sothe radiai part R(P) is assumed to have the form

    R ( r ) = r .r"cxp(-er"'~-pr) (2.7)where a, and c, are constants independent of F and their values zre determined tosatisfy :he Schradinger equation ( 2 . 4 ) . The constant c s of course positive, becausethe radial wavefunction R ( r ) must become zero at r+w. If the divergence of the radial?an R ( r ) is prohibited at the origin r=O, n must be larger than zero.

    Mter substitution of ( 2 7) into 2.4), the left-hand side of (2.4) becomes

  • 7/27/2019 0305-4470_24_22_010

    4/7

    3. SOhXtbJ~Of the X&XWE'ellCe f5KmEhIf the iad ial wavefunction R ( r ) is required t o be normalizable, c must be zero at afinite number of n. If all c. are zera for n> /< the recurrence form ula (2 .11) gives thefallowing conditions:

    3 @ = 02mP 2 + , E = 0n

    i (2k+ =O (3.4)3.5)( l c + 1 ) p - - y b = Omh

    andk ( k + 1)- I+ 1)= o (3.6)

    Equations (3.1) and 3.5) fix (Y and p, bu t these a and p cannot satisfy (3.2) andwhere it is assumed that ck# 0.(3.4). So we intro duc e additxonai counter terms in the potentiai U ( r ) , hat is,

    3.7)brU ?)=r - -+er ' /*+fr-" 'where canstants e and f are determined io satisfy the S chrodinger equaiion (2.1). Then(3.2) and (3.4) are rewritten into

    (3.8)m3up 7 O?I

  • 7/27/2019 0305-4470_24_22_010

    5/7

    5270 Tezuhoand

    3 2 k + $ ) a + 7 f = Omh (3.9)

    Now the simultaneous equations we have to solve are (3.1), (3.3), 13.5). (3 6) , (3 .8)and (3.9). From (3.1) we obtain a;~(3.10)

    where a is positive. M s o . from ( 3 5 ) we obtain pb (3.11)=- k + l ) f i 2

    m

    It sezms as If p was dependent on k But k IS determined by (3.6) ask = i (3 12)Thus

    bp =--I + I)+?IS constant. The condition (3 12) requires that all c should be zero for n < k if we useit in (2.10).The energy eigenvalue E is given by (3.3 ;

    a 2 b 2 (3 14)?( +1) hwhich depends only OF the angular momentum I. Additional constants e and aredetermined by (3.8) and (3.9) ss

    E = -

    2nd(3.15)

    (3.16)These are riependeni on In order rbst die SchrCdinger equa ibn with rhe concnementpotential given by (2 .3) nas an aaaiytical solution, the additional terms are necessary,2s shown in (3.7) , and these terms depend on the orbital angular momentum .4. C5bocksianIt has been shown that the spherical symmetnc Schriidlnger equation with the potential

    (4.1)r j = m - - + -r 1 1has an analyticai solution. The iadial wavefunction with orbital angn?ar momentum 1can be written as

    R i r f = c , r ' e x p - d - p i ) (4.2)

  • 7/27/2019 0305-4470_24_22_010

    6/7

    Analytical solution of the Scb'odanger equation 5271where

    and mp =- I + l)h2 IThe constant c is determmed by the normalization conditionThe energy eigenvalue E is given by

    (4.3)

    ( 4 . 4 )

    2nd depends only on The state is determmed only by the orbltal angular momentum1 and is degenerate (21+1)-fold.In the case where the potentizl does not inciude the Coulomb term proportlonalto l r , we may set b = O . From (3 5 ) or 4.41, p = O Then, from (4.5). the energyeigenvalue is always zero This potential is the sunpiest, but is not very interesting. Sowe propose the asymptotically linear confinement potential 4.1). The most popularphenomenological p~tentialhat is used to calculate hadronic properties is the inear+Coulomb type potential [4]. If necessary, we could add other terms, hut the potential41) is hp r i n q l ~ s t spp otica y linear po entia that w e can so ve snz y+cs ;z.

    Calculations of hadron properties will be carried out with this potential.For the purpose of comparison, Eichten's potential [4]bU r )=a r - - 4.6)r

    and the new proposed one ( 4 are shown in figure 1 with the same values of theparameters a and 6. It will be easy to determine the vdlues of the parameters a and6 to reproduce the physical quantities of hadrons.

    Figure 1. Companson of he potential (4 1) wth 1 - 0 --I and E chten's potential [41I(".O, ,- - j wrih ihe same d u e s of a = o is: G e v , b = a 3 2 and ma s s in = i . @ Gcj'

  • 7/27/2019 0305-4470_24_22_010

    7/7

    5272 H TezukaIf the quark state IS given by an analytical form, many physical properties of uarks

    can be easily calculated and understood. It must be worthwhile to investigate quarksin the potentiai given by (4.1)

    References[I] Kogut I and Surrkind L 1974 Phys Re" D 9 3501Wilson K G 1974 Phw Re" D 10 2445Pooemo E C and Schnitier H J 1978 Phyr Re" Leff 41 1344, 1979 Phys Rev D 19 1557Su& H 1978 hw RE" D 17 469. 1979 h y Reo D 20 1412

    Rtcnardson J L 1979 Phys Le11 82s 272Buehmeller W, Grunberg G and Tye S-H H 1980 PhVs Reo Len 45 103Qui= C. Thacker H B and Losner J L 1980 PAYS Re D 21 234

    [2] Isgnr N and Karl G 1977 P h p Le11 728 109, 1980 Phvs Reo D 21 3175Tegw R,Brockmann Rand Weise W 1952 Z P h p A 307 339Hoiacsek K G, lwamura Y an< Nagam. Y 1985 Phys Rei, D 32 3001Wu T T lcCoy B M end Cheng B 1974 Phy~Reo D 9 3495DeGiand T e1 a 1975 Phys Rea D 12 2060H u m 8 K and Stump D R 1976 Phys Reo. D 14 223Brown G E and Rho M 1979 Phyr Left 82B 177Squires E 1 1979 Rep Pro$ Phyr 42 1187Miller G A, Thomas A W ana Tklhebirge S 1980 Phys Lei1 91B 192Thomas A W 1983 Adu Nucl Phys 13 1141 Eichten E er a 1975 Phyr Reu Le . 34 369, 198U P h p Re" D21 203Kaurkal R S 1975 Pkys. Leff SIB 354, 1975 Phys L en M1B 81Pigipnon D and Piketry C A 1978 Ntud Phys E 137340Niclusch 1.1. Duiand L and Durand B 1904 P h p ru D 38 660Geffen D A and Suura H 1977 Phys Re" D 16 3305Bhanot G ard Ri;daz S 1978 Phys Lerr 788 119Euchmuller W and Tyye S-H 1981 4 s e o D 24 132Miller K J and Cissan M G 1982 P hy s Reo D 25 2353Gunion P aad LI L F 1975 P h y ~Rev D :f 3583Schnieer H 7 1976 Pliys Lerr 65B 239Barbirn R e1 01 1576 NUCLhi,s 9 105 125

    131 Chodas A ef a 1974 Phys Re" D 9 3471

    151 Hennques A B, Kellett B K and Moorhouse I? G 1976 Phys Le11 bgg 85

    [61 De Ruiula A, Georgi H and Glashow S L 1975 Phvi Re" D 12 147

    Bank N and Jena 5 N I980 i f r y Rei. D 2 XU7Gupt? S N, Radford S F ano Rcpko W W 1982 P ?ys Rev D 26 3305. 1986 P f n s Rev D 31 201Buchnuiler W 1482 Phw Lett 1128 679Moxh~y and Rorner 3 L 953 Phys. Reo D a3 1132; 1985 Phys Rev D 3 1762McCrav R and Byerr N 1983 Phi; Rev D 28 1692Michael C 1986 Phys. Re Lm. 56 1219Igi K and Ono S 1986 P ~ Y Sev. D 33 3349Schmitz S, Bcsvrs D and Kavr P 1987 P h y . Sec E 6 184Childerr R W 1967 Phyr Rev D 36 3813Dib C 0 riman F J and F r a ~ t n i J 1988 Phys Rev. D 31 735Flilcner L ? 1988 ? h p R s i D 37 1255, 1990 Piqr Re" D t 2337Gupta S N, Re& W W a r d Suchyta C 111 1989 Phys. Rev D 39 974