46
Increasing Both Quantity and Quality of Rice Production with Reduced Inputs: The System of Rice Intensification 12 th European Rice Millers Convention Venice – September 18, 2009 Norman Uphoff Cornell University

0956 Increasing Both Quantity and Quality of Rice Production with Reduced Inputs: The System of Rice Intensification

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Increasing Both Quantity and Quality of Rice

Production with Reduced Inputs:

The System of Rice Intensification

12th European Rice Millers Convention

Venice – September 18, 2009

Norman Uphoff Cornell University

What is SRI? Basically, SRI is a set of concepts/ principles/insights/practices that

introduce changes in the management of plants, soil, water

& nutrients to:(a) produce larger, more effective

ROOT SYSTEMS, and (b) enrich the LIFE IN THE SOIL

to achieve more productive,healthier PHENOTYPES

from any GENOTYPE

CUBA: rice plants of same variety (VN 2084) and same age

(52 DAP)

CAMBODIA: Farmer in Takeo Province: yield of 6.72 tons/ha > 2-3 t/ha

NEPAL:Single rice

plant grownwith SRI methods, Morang district

MALI: Farmer in the Timbuktu region

showing the difference between a

‘normal’ rice and an SRI rice plant

2007: 1st year trials -

SRI yield 8.98 t/ha,control yield 6.7 t/ha(best mgmt practices)

2008: trials expanded

with 5 farmers in 12 villages doing on-farm comparison

trials (N=60)

  SRI ControlFarmer Practice

Yield t/ha* 9.1 5.49 4.86Standard Error (SE) 0.24 0.27 0.18SRI compared to Control (%) + 66 100 -11SRI compared to Farmer Practice (%)

+ 87 + 13 100

Number of Farmers 53 53 60

• * adjusted to 14% grain moisture content

Rice grain yield for SRI plots, control plots, and farmer-practice plots,

Goundam circle, Timbuktu region, 2008

Indonesia:Rice plants

same varietyand same age

in LombokProvince

Indonesia: Results of on-farm comparative evaluations of SRI

by Nippon Koei team, 2002-06 • No. of trials: 12,133 (over 9 seasons)• Total area covered: 9,429.1 hectares• Ave. increase in yield: 3.3 t/ha (78%)• Reduction in water requirements: 40%• Reduction in fertilizer use: 50%• Reduction in costs of production: 20% (Sato and Uphoff, CAB Review, 2007)

AFGHANISTAN: SRI field in Baghlan Province, supported by Aga Khan Foundation Natural Resource Management

program

SRI field in Baghlan Province, Afghanistan at 30 days

SRI rice plant @ 72 days after

transplanting – 133 tillers

Yield was calculated at

11.56 tons/ha

IRAQ: Comparison trials at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station, Najaf

SRI originated in Madagascar

Initially called le Systéme de Riziculture Intensive(in Latin America, SICA) by Henri de Laulanié, SJ, who, by 1984, assembled SRI’s counterintuitive practices after 2 decades of working with small, poor farmers to improve their production and incomes, without requiring any dependence on inputs

Fr. de Laulaniémaking field visitshortly before his

death in 1995

MADAGASCAR: Rice field grown with SRI methods

Rice sector needs in 21st century

(IRRI/DG, Intl. Year of Rice, 2004)• Increased land productivity-- higher yield• Higher water productivity -- crop per drop• Technology that is accessible for the poor• Technology that is environmentally friendly • Greater resistance to pests and diseases • Tolerance of abiotic stresses (climate

change) • Better grain quality for consumers, and• Greater profitability for farmers

SRI practices can meet all these needs:

• Higher yields by 50-100%, or more• Water reduction of 25-50% (also rainfed)• Little need for capital expenditure• Little or no need for agrochemical inputs• Pest and disease resistance is induced • Drought tolerance; no lodging• Better grain quality, and • Lower costs of production by 10-20% → giving farmers higher income

Additional benefits of SRI practice:

• Time to maturity reduced by 1-2 weeks• Milling outturn is higher by about 15%• Other crops’ performance is also being improved by SRI concepts and practices, e.g., wheat, sugar cane, millet, teff, others• Human resource development for farmers through participatory approach• Diversification and modernization of smallholder agriculture; can adapt to larger- scale production through mechanization

Requirements/constraints for SRI:

For best results, need:•Water control to apply small amounts reliably; rainfed SRI now being developed•More labor initially during learning phase; but SRI can become labor-saving; also, SRI practices can become mechanized•Skill and motivation of farmers is key!•Crop protection in some situations ?SRI is matter of degree more than kind -- itsmethods are applied in wide range of agroecologies

SRI is Ideas/Insights, not Technology

1. Use young seedlings to preserve growth potential -- however, direct seeding is becoming an option

2. Avoid trauma to the roots --transplant quickly, carefully, shallow; no inversion of root tips upward

3. Give plants wider spacing – one plant per hill, square pattern for better root/canopy growth

4. Soil is kept moist but unflooded – mostly aerobic, not continuously saturated (hypoxic)

5. Actively aerate the soil as much as possible

6. Enhance soil organic matter as much as possible

Practices 1-3 support more PLANT growth; practices 4-6 enhance the growth and health of ROOTS and soil BIOTA

Two Paradigms for Agriculture:

• GREEN REVOLUTION strategy was to:(a) Change the genetic potential of plants, and

(b) Increase the use of external inputs -- more water, more fertilizer and biocides

• SRI (AGROECOLOGY) changes instead the management of plants, soil, water & nutrients:

(a) Promote the growth of root systems, and

(b) Increase the abundance and diversity of soil organisms to better enlist their benefits

The goal is to produce better PHENOTYPES

SRI

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

IH H FH MR WR YRStage

Org

an d

ry w

eigh

t(g/

hill)

CK

I H H FH MR WR YR

Yellowleaf andsheathPanicle

Leaf

Sheath

Stem

47.9% 34.7%

“Non-Flooding Rice Farming Technology in Irrigated Paddy Field”Dr. Tao Longxing, China National Rice Research Institute, 2004

China National Rice Research Institute (CNRRI): factorial trials, 2004 & 2005

using two super-hybrid varieties --seeking to break ‘plateau’ limiting

yieldsStandard Rice

Mgmt• 30-day seedlings• 20x20 cm spacing• Continuous

flooding• Fertilization:

– 100% chemical

New Rice Mgmt (~SRI)• 20-day seedlings• 30x30 cm spacing• Alternate wetting

and drying (AWD)• Fertilization:

– 50% chemical, – 50% organic

Average super-rice YIELD (kg/ha) with new rice

management (SRI) vs.standard rice management

at different PLANT DENSITIES ha-1

0100020003000400050006000700080009000

10000

150,000 180,000 210,000

NRMSRM

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

0 100 200

N uptake (kg/ha)

Gra

in y

ield

(kg

/ha

)

Grain yield SRI

(kg/ha)

Grainyield Conv

(kg/ha)

Poly.:Grain yield

SRI (kg/ha)

Poly.: Grain yield

Conv. (kg/ha)

Rice grain yield response to N uptake

Regression relationship between N uptake and grain yield for SRI and conventional methods using QUEFTS model (Barison,

2002) – same for P and K

SRI LANKA: Rice paddies,with same soil, same variety, same irrigation system and same drought, three weeks after water was stopped: conventional

(left), SRI (right)

Journal of Sichuan Agricultural Science and Technology

(2009), Vol. 2, No. 23“Introduction of Land-Cover Integrated Technologies with Water Saving and High Yield” -- Lv S.H., Zeng X.Z., Ren G.H., Zhang F.S.

Yield increase in normal year is 150-200 kg/mu (2.25-3.0 t/ha); while in drought year, increase is 200 kg/mu or more (≥3.0 t/ha)

• In a normal year, net income with the new methods can be increased from 100 ¥/mu to 600-800 ¥/mu, i.e., from $220/ha to >$1,500/ha, while• In drought year with the new methods, net income can go from a loss of 200-300 ¥/mu to a profit of 300-500 ¥/mu, i.e., from a loss of $550/ha to a profit of $880/ha

VIETNAM: Farmer in Dông Trù village – after typhoon

Reduction in Diseases and PestsVietnam National IPM Program evaluation based on data from 8

provinces, 2005-06Spring season Summer season

SRIPlots

Farmer

Plots

Differ-ence

SRIPlots

Farmer

Plots

Differ-ence

Sheath blight

6.7%

18.1%

63.0% 5.2%

19.8%

73.7%

Leaf blight

-- -- -- 8.6%

36.3%

76.5%

Small leaf folder *

63.4 107.7 41.1% 61.8 122.3 49.5%

Brown plant hopper *

542 1,440 62.4% 545 3,214 83.0%

AVERAGE

55.5% 70.7%

* Insects/m2

Period Period Mean Mean max. max.

temp. temp. 00CC

Mean Mean min. min.

temp. temp. 00C C

No. of No. of sunshine sunshine

hrshrs

1 – 151 – 15 NovNov 27.727.7 19.219.2 4.94.9

16–3016–30 Nov Nov 29.629.6 17.917.9 7.57.5

1 – 15 Dec1 – 15 Dec 29.129.1 14.614.6 8.68.6

16–31 Dec 16–31 Dec 28.128.1 12.212.2** 8.68.6

Meteorological and yield data from ANGRAU IPM evaluation, Andhra

Pradesh, India, 2006

SeasonSeason Normal (t/ha)Normal (t/ha) SRI (t/ha)SRI (t/ha)

Rabi 2005-06Rabi 2005-06 2.25 2.25 3.473.47

Kharif 2006Kharif 2006 0.21*0.21* 4.164.16

* Low yield was due to cold injury (see above)

*Sudden drop in min. temp. during 16–21 Dec.: 9.2-9.8oC for 5 days

Measured Differences in Grain Quality

Conv. Methods SRI Methods Characteristic (3 spacings) (3 spacings) DifferenceChalky

kernels (%)

39.89 – 41.07 23.62 – 32.47 -30.7%

General chalkiness (%)

6.74 – 7.17 1.02 – 4.04 -65.7%

Milled rice outturn (%)

41.54 – 51.46 53.58 – 54.41 +16.1%

Head milled rice (%)

38.87 – 39.99 41.81 – 50.84 +17.5%Paper by Prof. Ma Jun, Sichuan Agricultural University,

presented at 10th conference on “Theory and Practice forHigh-Quality, High-Yielding Rice in China,” Haerbin,

8/2004

Welcome to the world of Tilda

PROMOTION OF SRI WITH BASMATI

RICE IN HARYANA

Powerpoint for 3rd National SRI Symposium, Coimbatore, India, 12/08

SRI: Increased farm yield

•Higher tillering

•More filled grains per panicle

•Better grain weight

SRI: Improved Basmati Quality

• Improved head rice recovery

• Reducing chalkiness

• Less green grains

• Fewer damaged & discolored grains

• Reduced immature grains

• Better shining

Haryana farmers’ views

• Bit complicatedBit complicated• Not cheap Not cheap • Labor-intensiveLabor-intensive• Requires continuous attentionRequires continuous attention• Need strong extension & Need strong extension &

trainingtrainingSRI has tremendous potential for small farmersSRI has tremendous potential for small farmers

Constraints on SRI

System of Rice Intensification (SRI)

1 KM Defence Road, Bhobatian Chowk,

Raiwind Road, Lahore Tel: +92 (042) 532 2205 Fax: +92 (042) 532 1509

[email protected]

Solutions Provider in Farm Sector

Raised Bed Maker with Fertilizer & Compost Applicator

Does 5 jobs in one go:

• Opens furrows

• Makes raised bed

• Shapes/compacts bed

• Applies fertilizer in the root zone

• Applies compost in a band where the plant is going to be transplanted

Recommended dose of compost is 4 tons per acre.However, with this machine doing precision placement in a band, compost application can be only 200-400 kg.

Precision Weeder in Operation without a Tractor Operator

Crop condition 62 days after transplanting --average no. of tillers per plant exceeds 90

VID

00034-20090823-1733.3GP

METHANE EMISSIONS

Research on greenhouse gases

(GHG) at Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB)

N2O EMISSIONS

Research on greenhouse gases

(GHG) at Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB)

Yan, X., H. Akiyama, K. Yagi and H. Akomoto. ‘Global estimations of the inventory and

mitigation potential of methane emissions from rice cultivation conducted using the 2006

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines.’ Global Biochemical Cycles, (2009)

“We estimated that if all of the continuously flooded rice fields were drained at least once during the growing season, the CH4

emissions would be reduced by 4.1 Tg a-1 . Furthermore, we estimated that applying rice straw off-season wherever and

whenever possible would result in a further reduction in emissions of 4.1 Tg a-1 globally. … if both of these mitigation options were

adopted, the global CH4 emission from rice paddies could be reduced by 7.6 Tg a-1. Although draining continuously flooded

rice fields may lead to an increase in nitrous oxide (N2O) emission, the global warming potential resulting from this increase is negligible when compared to the reduction in global warming potential that would result from the CH4

reduction associated with draining the fields.”

Status of SRI: As of 1999

Known and practiced only in Madagascar

Spread of SRI demonstrations and use in 10 years

Up to 1999 Madagascar1999-2000 China, Indonesia2000-01 Bangladesh, Cambodia,

Cuba, India, Laos, Nepal, Myanmar, Philippines, Gambia, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Thailand

2002-03 Benin, Guinea, Mozambique, Peru

2004-05 Senegal, Mali, Pakistan, Vietnam

2006 Burkina Faso, Bhutan, Iran, Iraq, Zambia

2007 Afghanistan 2008 Brazil, Egypt, Rwanda,

Ecuador, Costa Rica, Timor Leste2009 Ghana . . .

THANK YOU

• Web page: http://ciifad.cornell.edu/sri/

• Email: [email protected] or [email protected]