Upload
ruby-merritt
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
BANNER
READING ANDUNDERSTANDING AMEDICINE LEAFLET BYADOLESCENTCONSUMERS AND ITSDETERMINANTS
Burapadaja S, Jamreondararasame B,Sanguansermsri JFaculty of PharmacyChiang Mai UniversityThailand
2
Reading and Understanding a Medicine Leaflet by Adolescent Consumers and Its
Determinants Burapadaja S, Jamreondararasame B, Sanguansermsri J
Abstract: Problem Statement: In Thailand, there is an increase of medications and there are
still problems of inappropriate medication use. One problem is that consumers have little
information on medications. Reading and understanding a medicine leaflet is one way to
obtain such information that could result in appropriate medication use. But there is little
knowledge on how to promote this behavior. Objectives: To determine if consumers read
and understand leaflets about medicines, and the factors affecting a consumer's reading and
understanding of a leaflet. Design: A cross-sectional design was used to examine the leaflet
content of Dangerous medicine compared with a suggestion for leaflet content by WHO. The
same design, using a questionnaire, was used to investigate reading practices. A two-group
design was used to determine comprehension of the leaflet content. All analyses used the p
value of 0.05. Setting: This national study was done in a university in Chiang Mai by
members of the professional sector. Study Population: The leaflet sample (n=154)
information was collected from community pharmacies by purposive sampling. The subject
sample (n=348) was recruited from the freshmen in 2002 of a university (N about 4000) by
systematic sampling. Intervention: An original leaflet was selected from the leaflet sample.
A new leaflet was developed using the same content as the original one but with a different
design to make the content easily understandable. Each subject was assigned either to Group
1 to read the original leaflet or to Group 2 to read the new one, and understanding was
measured using a 24-item test. Each item had three choices. A correct choice was given a
score for an item. Results: About 90% of leaflets examined had less information for
consumers than that suggested by WHO. Some content could be unfamiliar and difficult for
consumers to understand. About 20% of consumers read a leaflet regularly when buying or
taking a medicine. The main factors affecting low consumer reading were little access to a
leaflet and low ability of consumers to read. Difficult leaflet content would inhibit consumers
from reading them. The average score of Group 1 was 13.81 (57%) from a total of 24, and
that of Group 2 was 18.37 (76%) which was significantly higher. Both percentages were
lower than 80%, the understanding level accepted by several countries. Leaflet content was a
main factor affecting the understanding. Arranging the content to be more easily
understandable could increase the understanding level. Conclusions: Factors affecting a
consumer’s reading and understanding of a leaflet included little access to a leaflet, difficult
content and insufficient information. These shortages should be improved so that consumers
could understand apppropriate use of medication. The governmental sector and other related
sectors should provide more access and guarantee the quality of leaflet for consumers.
3
INTRODUCTION
• There is an increase of medication • There are still problems of
inappropriate medication use• A problem is that consumers have little
information on medication• A medicine leaflet is an official written
source that could provide such information
Advantages of reading and
understanding of a leaflet
• Increasing compliance
• Increasing awareness of possible
adverse actions
• Improving medication knowledge
• Preventing drug-related problems
4
Therefore, consumers should read,
understand and follow the leaflet when
buying or taking a medicine because
they could perform appropriate
medication by doing that.
But we have little knowledge about
whether consumers get information by
reading and understanding a leaflet, so
this study focused on this issue and had
these questions:
• Do consumers read and understand a
leaflet?
• What are the factors affecting the
consumer’s reading and
understanding of a leaflet ?
5
OBJECTIVES
To determine if consumers read and
understand leaflets about medicines,
and the factors affecting a consumer’s
reading and understanding of a leaflet
6
METHODS
Phase A Leaflet content
Population: Leaflets of “Dangerous
medicines” commonly
used at drugstores
Sampling: A sample (n=154) was
collected in two
months
Analysis: Content analysis based
on WHO Guidelines
WHO Guidelines for leaflet information
Medicine name PrecautionComposition ContraindicationIndication Adverse effectDosage Specific warningProperty Storage Duration of treatment
7
Phase B Consumer’s reading
Population: University freshmen
(N about 4000)
Sampling: A sample (n=348) was
selected basing on
student code
Theory: Social Cognitive
Variables: Attitude, Belief,
Personal influence,
Availability, Access,
Content barrier,
Self-efficacy and
Reading a leaflet
Tool: A questionnaire
reliable and valid
Analysis: Path analysis
•
8
Phase C Consumer’s understandingA set of leaflets was selected from the leaflet sample
basing on these criteria: separating from its label, having one composition and having at least 9 information topics. A leaflet was randomly selected from this set and referred to as an original.
A new leaflet was developed by using the same content as the original but with different arrangement. The arrangement aimed to make the new one easily understandable basing on these criteria: using simple words, emphasizing critical words, separating sentence into items
and putting content in order.
A 24-item test used for the leaflet comprehension of
reader had a total score of 24.
The same sample as Phase B was divided into
Group 1 to read the original leaflet, and
Group 2 to read the new leaflet
Then both groups did the test.
9
RESULTS
Phase A Leaflet contentPresence of information topic
Topic % LeafletDosage 99.3Name 97.4Indication 96.7Composition 59.7Specific warning 43.5Precaution 40.2Property 39.6Duration 33.1Contraindication 29.9Adverse effect 25.3Storage condition 20.8
1 Almost all leaflets had less information suggested by WHO
2 There were technical terms that might be difficult for consumers to understand
3 A leaflet separate from its label tended to have more information
10
Phase B Consumer’s reading
1 Percentage of reading
% RespondentRegular reading 17.5Irregular reading 82.5
2 Factors affecting the reading
Direct factors Access to a leaflet Self-efficacy to read a leafletIndirect factors (via self-efficacy)
Content difficult to understand Access to a leaflet
11
Phase C Consumer’s understanding
The average score of both groups
Group 1 Group 213.81 18.37 p .001(57%) (76%)
This meant that the criteria used todeveloped the new leaflet could increase the understanding score or level.
However, several countries accept that the content is considered asunderstandable when the understandinglevel of reader is 80%.
Compared to the acceptable level, the understanding levels of both groupswere lower and unsatisfactory.
12
CONCLUSIONS
Most consumers seldom read a leaflet regularly when purchasing or taking a medicine because of little access to a leaflet and low self-efficacy to read due to difficult content.
The consumer’s understanding of a leaflet was unsatisfactory because of content difficult to understand.
There were shortages of leaflets:Little access to a leafletContent difficult to understandInsufficient information
These shortages should be improved in order that consumers could read and understand a leaflet.
13
Reasons to improve the leaflets
• To empower consumers in caring for their medication and health
• To provide more access to information on medication
• To create a supportive leaflet• To guarantee health care provision
SUGGESTIONS
• A leaflet should be separate from its label because it would be more accessible and could have more information.
• A leaflet should be understandable by passing a test of understanding
• Like a label, a leaflet should have a standard information enough and essential for consumers