33
1 Cooperation, version 2002 USIT Networks are Cooperation Networks are Cooperation Networks are communication Networks are communication Communication is Cooperation Communication is Cooperation Networking since the 1970s UNINETT, NORDUnet Baltics projects NATO networking panel member Rolf Nordhagen Rolf Nordhagen Professor of Informatics (ret.) Professor of Informatics (ret.) University of Oslo University of Oslo Center for Information Technology Services Center for Information Technology Services [email protected] [email protected]

1 Cooperation, version 2002 USIT Networks are Cooperation Networks are communicationNetworks are communication Communication is CooperationCommunication

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Networks are CooperationNetworks are Cooperation

• Networks are communicationNetworks are communication

• Communication is CooperationCommunication is Cooperation

Networking since the 1970sUNINETT, NORDUnetBaltics projectsNATO networking panel member

Rolf NordhagenRolf NordhagenProfessor of Informatics (ret.)Professor of Informatics (ret.)University of OsloUniversity of OsloCenter for Information Technology ServicesCenter for Information Technology [email protected]@usit.uio.no

2 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

INTERNET

• A vast technological interconnect, spanning regions, countries, continents

SERVICES • Electronic Mail

• File transfer• Information browsing and capture

WWW

CONTENT

3 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

By creating linked information spaces on the Internet, opportunities exist to create local, regional and national information highways, spanning across communities interacting within themselves, or with other regions. By linking together citizens, schools, libraries, newspapers and other information sources, local authorities and institutions, and with outside connections, it is possible to create powerful regional electronic infrastructures.

4 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

The most optimistic views on the Internet claim that this may improve the interaction between people and institutions, permit better access to governement by those governed, and greatly ease the general access to information. Particularly for the educational process may benefit. A more open society is the goal.

5 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Examples

• General information

• Geographical information

• Distance Education

• Publishing on Demand

• News services

• Public Information

6 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

NORDUnet as an example

Gestation period 1980 - 1984Nordic Council of Ministers approved 1985

NORDUNET project 1986 - 891.2 Mill. USD

Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden

Networks are cooperation

7 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

GIX Washington

Reykjavik

EMPB London

Ebone Paris

EMPB Amsterdam NASK Warshaw

BALTnet Vilnius

BALTnet Tallin

Trondheim

Copenhagen

Stockholm

8 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Networks are CooperationNORDUnet, how did it begin

• By enthusiasts working together in the Nordic countries creating an International project, with sufficient focus to release internordic funding.

• By securing support by all potentially competing organisation by letting (almost) all get a piece of the action.

• Strengthened by the attraction of working internationally instead of locally,

• and by the fact that no national groups had managed to create viable projects on their own.

9 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

NORDUnet

• Cooperation between 5 national networks

• Cooperation on International connectivity

• Common services and pilot development

• Supporting all major protocols and services

• Harmonising mail services

• Joint training of experts

• Cooperation with major Telecom operators

10 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Communication is Cooperation

• Services can rarely be done by one provider alone

• The necessary level of competence could not be reached on a country by country basis

• Institutional groups too small both in• people with interest and knowledge

• resources and demanding users

• Development cooperation required on all levels

11 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

The NORDUNET lesson

• Many institutions scattered across several countries worked together by each getting major responsibilities

• Distributed projects create joint enthusiasm and work towards common goals

• Shared responsibilities

• All got benefit from building competence

• Network communication is working together

12 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Shared responsibilities

• Representative Steering Body from major national centers

• Initial management, Technical: Norway (OSLO),

• Administrative: Sweden (SICS) later moved to Denmark (UNI C)

• Operating centers, International Sweden (KTH)

• National centers

• Coordinated representation in International bodies

13 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

International support issues

• seminars and workshops, training

• personell exchange programs

• consultancy work when necessary

• purchase of critical equipment

• direct support by a time limited funding of international links

14 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

NORDUnet A/S

• Created 14 December 1994 to give

• Well defined legal body

• Certain freedom of action

• Equal control by partners

• Distinct from partners

15 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

NORDUnet is now a limited company NORDUnet A/S,NORDUnet is now a limited company NORDUnet A/S,owned and financed by owned and financed by Nordic states or state institutionsNordic states or state institutions

DK DK - UNI-C NO - UNINETT- UNI-C NO - UNINETTFI FI - Ministry of education SE - Högskoleverket - Ministry of education SE - Högskoleverket IS IS - University of Iceland- University of Iceland

All work doneAll work done by partnersby partners

Small secretariatSmall secretariatDirector Peter VillemoesDirector Peter Villemoes

16 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

0

100

200

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

MD

KK

/yea

r10 M$

20 M$

YearlyBudgets

17 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

16

USA

45

34

121

The network in 2001

Géant

NETNODD-GIX

6221866 1344

KPNQwest

18 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

EXPENSES IN 1998

ca. 33 M$

19 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

USA LINK HISTORY

20 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Added benefits of cooperating

• Vastly improved services secured sustainable support from national ministries in the Nordic region.

• Hightened competence for smaller groups by working together

• Joint access to, and more influence on international work when representing a larger collaboration.

• ECONOMIES OF SCALE

21 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

CanadaCanada

SwedenSweden

FinlandFinland

U.S.U.S.

IcelandIceland

DenmarkDenmark

NorwayNorway

AustraliaAustralia

SingaporeSingapore

N.ZealandN.Zealand

NetherlandNetherland

SwitzerlandSwitzerland

United KingdomUnited Kingdom

%%

Nordic Internet penetration comparison 1999

22 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Ongoing Challenges

• Break the cost barrier

• Maintain Nordic leadership

• Continue collaboration

• Remain active in Europe

The NORDUNET2 initiative

23 Cooperation, version 2002

USITThe History of NetworkingThe History of Networking

is Cooperationis Cooperation

• The first international connection was by satellite to Kjeller, Norway, and terrestrial to UCL, London in 1973.

• IETF, Internet Engineering Task Force, worldwide work on standards

• European networking success is due to a long series of cooperative organisations:

• RARE RIPE TERENA

• Nordic cooperation to support emerging networks in the Baltics

• Honour to CEENET !

24 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Creating plans

• Joint Seminars and Workshops

• Broad participation, R&D, Universities• industry, PTT/PTO ?

• financial and political rep. ?

• Subjects• the infrastructure

• PTT transmission facilities

• Universities and local site needs

• International connectivity and technology

• Financial and management aspects

25 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Cooperation ChecklistMajor issues

• Identification of sites and organisations to connect

• International cooperation and connectivity

• Which sites have possibilities now

• What other are prioritized in terms of ongoing projects?

• Identify shared responsibilities and distribution of projects

• How to support USERS

26 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Content driven network services

• Developed by working together

• Service providers: Computer Centers,Network operators

• Information Providers

• Libraries

• Educators

• Public, Private, Commercial

27 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Present Challenges

• "Multimedia" services and

• High Speed Technologies (ATM)

• New paradigms in Education• Distance education

• Distributed libraries

• Electronic publishing

• Structure and organisation of information

• New adminstrative services,

• Region Wide Information Systems

28 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

The Vision

• The high capacity network as a regional, The high capacity network as a regional, national, and international infrastructure,national, and international infrastructure,a highway for education, services and a highway for education, services and entertainment, with open and easy access entertainment, with open and easy access to the publicto the public

• Liberte, egalite, fraterniteLiberte, egalite, fraternite

29 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Cooperation ChecklistTechnical

• Basic transmission issues, leased line capacity and quality, alternatives, like microwave, radiolink and dial-up access

• Routing, placement, PC, based?, topology,

• international routes

• DNS support, .country servers, where and

• what is needed in terms of equipment

• Mail gatewaying, interworking (X.400)

• General equipment needs, UNIX servers, PCs, Modems

30 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Cooperation ChecklistFunding and organisation

• Implementation cost for regional and international efforts, plan needed

• Operational costs, estimate needed

• What organisational framework will support:• cooperative and shared projects

• the operations

• administrative support for registration

• of network, organisation and addresses

• the user steering of the services as a whole

• signing of international agreements

31 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Cooperation ChecklistPolicy

• Internet registration• Relations to the local PTTs and local

governments?• R&D network vs public service relations?• R&D networking a pilot phase before true public

service?

• Funding initially and long term• Relations to existing European activities• Relations to extended connectivity CEE States• Relations to national standards organisations• and registration authorities

32 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Organisations/Functions

• Service provider/Operations centre

• Name registry and Address registry

• Technical Coordinations group for all network service providers - interconnecting/routing coordination

• File/Program archive, FTP, NEWS, WWW etc.

• Policy setting of tariffs/cost sharing

• The base for all must be the USERS

33 Cooperation, version 2002

USIT

Operation Centre Tasks

• Network operation• Installation, configuration of modems, routers

• Fault handling - international/national links

• Statistics, for planning

• Domain Name Service

• Routing Arbitration

• (Engineering, Planning, Names

• and Address Registry)