Upload
silvia-lee
View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Dr. Jean Shorett Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
for Environment, Safety, & Occupational Health
Army Environmental Management System
DoD EPA Region 4 Pollution Prevention PartnershipEnvironmental Management System Initiative
Atlanta, Georgia August 6-8, 2002
2
1. Army adopting ISO 14001 as a goal
2. Tool for improving overall performance
3. Phased approach
Three to Remember
3
ACREAGE: More than the combined acreage of the states of New Jersey, Rhode Island, Delaware, and Connecticut
STATES:
BUILDINGS: SQUARE FEET: Equal to 166 Pentagons
HISTORIC PROPERTIES:
CULTURAL PROPERTIES:
ARCHEOLOGICL SITES
MAINTENANCE COSTS:
INSTALLATIONS: Six times as manyinstallations as the Air Force, Navy and Marines.
RESTORATION SITES:
17 Million Acres
50 States, DC,Territories
165,289 Buildings
1.1 Billion SF
12,000 Buildings
36,000 Sites
53,000 Sites
$2.1 Billion
4,162 Installations
12,000 Sites
ROADS: More than the combined totals of paved roads for the states of Delaware, Connecticut, and Rhode Island
ELECTRIC LINES: More than 12 times across the United States
RAILROADS: Army rails stretch nearly coast to coast
WATER LINES: More than 4 times across the United States
SEWAGE LINES: More than 2 times across the United States
POLLUTION CONTROL PERMITS:Army permits equal 47% of all DODpermits.
ENDANGERED SPECIES: Distinctendangered species exist on or contiguous to 94 Army installations.
28,743 Miles
23,754 Miles
2,910 Miles
12,955 Miles
7,930 Miles
2,500 Permits
170 Species
Army Real Estate
4
FY02 Budget DataFY02 Budget Data
Cle
anin
g u
p p
ast
sin
sC
lean
ing
up
pas
t si
ns ERER
$387M/25%$387M/25%
FUDSFUDS$221M/14%$221M/14%
BRACBRAC$143M/9%$143M/9%
ComplianceCompliance$531M/34%$531M/34%
ConservationConservation$124M/8%$124M/8%
TechnologyTechnology$77M/5%$77M/5%
ITAMITAM$38M/2%$38M/2%
Pollution Pollution PreventionPrevention
$39M/3%$39M/3%
$1.56B$1.56B
Managing Army's Environment
5
"Finding the path where both military readiness and environmental stewardship are reinforced
and improved by one another... is a very narrow path; but it is the path we must take to act as responsible defenders and citizens of
our country."
Thomas E. WhiteSecretary of the Army
The Path
Army's EMS aims to widen the path
The GoalThe Goal
The Platform -- Sustainable InstallationsThe Platform -- Sustainable Installations
The Tool --The Tool --Army' s mission-focused ISO 14001 EMS Army' s mission-focused ISO 14001 EMS
Sustainable & Transforming Operations Sustainable & Transforming Operations -- over decades of uncertainty-- over decades of uncertainty
7
Executive Order 13148
E.O. 13148 “Greening of Government Through Environmental Leadership”
Section 401(a)&(b) -- EMS requirements Agency level EMS self-assessment by 10/22/01 Pilot studies by 4/22/02 EMS at all appropriate federal facilities by
12/31/05
8
Meeting Requirements
Self-Assessment (1997, updated 2001) Pilot EMS installations (1997- 99)
Fort Bliss, El Paso, TX Fort Lewis, Tacoma, WA Letterkenny Army Depot, Chambersburg, PA Tobyhanna Army Depot, Tobyhanna, PA Radford Army Ammunition Plant, Radford VA US Army Military Academy, West Point, NY
US Army Proving Grounds, Yuma, AZ US Tank Automotive Research, Development &
Engineering Center (TARDEC), Warren, MI Ft Riley, Fort Riley, KS
9
Army EMS Timelines
Two requirements: 1. EO 13148 requires an EMS NLT 12/31/05
Must meet all 5 EMS Implementation criteria
2. Army EMS Action Memorandum requires a mission-focused, ISO 14001 conforming EMS NLT 2009 Part of overall Army Transformation Part of Transforming Installation Management
The Shift
Major shift in desired end-state: Current Goal – Compliance with regulatory
requirements. Obeying the law is essential but it doesn’t ensure mission sustainability.
New Goal – Sustainable & transforming operations. Can't happen without sustainable installations. Manage environmental issues to ensure long-term mission transition and continuance. (Still includes regulatory compliance.)
11
Army EMS Strategy:A Phased Approach
Adopted ISO 14001 with mission focus FY04 funding requirements identified
Central investment in guidance, tools, training
Initiate when funds available -- but can move out
Implementation required in FY04
EMS in place by E.O. 13148 deadline
Full conformance with ISO 14001 NLT FY09
12
Phased Implementation
12/31/05 EMS or
CEMP at all
appropriate
facilities
4/00 EO 13148
requires EMS
1997 Interim DoD EMS Policy
1997-99 DoD EMS Pilot Studies
10/01EMS Self
Assessment
4/02 EMS Pilots
External
Interna l
DoD EMS Policies
FY05
Army EMS in place
FY03 FY04FY01 FY02
FY01: Build Framework
FY02 & 03: Leverage & Enable
FY04& 05: Implement
FY06: EMS in Place
FY09: Full Conformance with ISO 14001
FY09+: Continual Improvement
No-Cost Access to ISO 14000 & 9000
FY06
Army EMS In Place
13
Background
Requirements & timelines
Army EMS strategy
What we mean by mission-advancing
Looking ahead
Questions
Agenda
14
Goals for FY02 & 03
Integrate mission priorities throughout EMS implementation
Deliver EMS implementation guidance, tools, training, & validation process
Raise awareness across The Army Develop SECARMY EMS Policy Minimize total EMS implementation cost
Definition Army Policy
Requirement
1. Policy
2. Self-Assessment
3. Awareness
4.Implementation Planning
5. Annual Review
Executive Order 13148, “Greening of Government Through Leadership in Environmental Management” requires an Environmental Management System at appropriate federal facilities by December 31, 2005.The Army Environmental Management System Action Memorandum requires a mission focus and conformance with the internationally recognized ISO 14001 EMS Standard NLT FY09."Installations" include all units, activities, programs, and tenants within fence lines. Formal definition is in DA PAM 405-45 para 2-3.For compliance with E.O. 13148, Army installations have an Environmental Management System in place when all five actions below are complete:
A policy statement consistent with the Army Environmental Management System Action Memorandum has been signed by the Garrison Commander & all Mission Commanders. An installation-wide Army Environmental Management System self-assessment has been documented and briefed to all Mission Commanders and signed by the Garrison Commander.
Installation personnel have received awareness-level briefings on Army's Environmental Management System.
A written plan with defined dates, identified resources, and organizational responsibilities for implementing a mission-advancing ISO 14001 Environmental Management System NLT FY09 hasbeen approved by Mission Commanders and signed by the Garrison Commander.
The Garrison Commander & all Mission Commanders conduct a documented annualreview of progress on the implementation plan to assure mission focus and ISO 14001 conformanceNLT FY09.
Environmental Management System Implementation Metrics
DRAFT
8/1/02
16
Army EMS Implementation Metrics reflect the five actions needed to comply with Section 401(b) of Executive Order 13148 and DoD & Army EMS Policies.
Metrics Army Policy
Approach
1. Policy
2. Self-Assessment
3. Awareness
4. Implementation Planning
5. Annual Review
Executive Order Compliance
Percentage of installations with a policy statement consistent with the Army Environmental Management System Action Memorandum and signed by the Garrison Commander & allInstallation Mission Commanders.
Percentage of installations with a documented Army Environmental Management System Self-Assessment briefed to all Mission Commanders and signed by the Garrison Commander.
Percentage of Army installations at which 25, 50, 75, & >90% of civilian and military personnelhave received awareness-level Army Environmental Management System briefings.
Percentage of installations with written plan with defined dates, identified resources, and organizational responsibilities for implementing a mission-advancing ISO 14001 EnvironmentalManagement System NLT FY09 has been approved by Mission Commanders and signed by theGarrison Commander.
Percentage of installations holding documented annual reviews of the installation plan for implementing Environmental Management System by the Garrison Commander & all MissionCommanders.
Percentage of installations meeting all five Army EMS criteria.
Environmental Management System Implementation Metrics
DRAFT
Army Policy Compliance Percentage of installations with self-declared conformance with Army's mission-focused ISO 14001.
8/1/02
17
Mission-Advancing
Look inward, look outward, look forward 100% continuous compliance & stewardship
Ensuring sustainable operations
Supporting The Army Transformation
Understanding host community priorities
Reducing lifecycle cost & risks
18
Installation-wide Mission
Priorities
Army's Mission-Focused Management System
19
Transforming Installation Management (TIM)
Part of larger Army Transformation
Clarifies roles Garrison Commander manages entire
installation Mission Commanders focus on mission
Aligned with US Federal regions
Speak with one voice
EMS integrated throughout
TIM Regions(TIM Regions align with Federal Regions)
Fort Belvoir
Aberdeen Proving Ground
Fort StoryFort Lee
Fort EustisFort Monroe
Ft. AP Hill
Radford AAP
Tobyhanna Army Depot
Letterkenny AD
Carlisle Barracks
Fort McNairFt. Meade
Fort Myer
Walter Reed
Ft Detrick
Adelphi Lab Ctr
Charles E. Kelly Spt Fac (USAR)
Fort Drum
West Point
Fort MonmouthPicatinny Arsenal
Watervliet ArsFt. Hamilton
Fort Dix (USAR)
II
Natick R & D Ctr
USA Cold Reg Lab
Fort Devens RFTA (USAR)
I
III
Fort McPherson
Fort Gordon
Fort StewartHunter Army Airfield
Fort Jackson
Ft Buchanan, PR
Fort Campbell
Fort Knox
Redstone Arsenal
Fort Benning
Fort Rucker
Anniston AD
Ft. Gillem
Milan AAP
Holston AAP
Mississippi AAP
Blue Grass AD
Fort BraggMOT Sunny Point
IV
Presidio of Monterey
Fort Irwin
Yuma Proving Ground
Fort Hauchuca
Riverbank AAP
Sierra Army Depot
Hawthorne ADCamp Parks (USAR)
Fort Hunter Liggett (USAR)
IX-
White Sands Missile Testing Center
Fort Sill
Fort BlissFort Hood
Fort Polk
Pine Bluff Ars
McAlester AAP
Red River ADLone Star AAP
Camp Stanley Storage Actv
Louisiana AAP
Fort Sam Houston
Corpus Christi AD
VI
Northeast(27)
Southeast (19)Southwest
(22)Overseas: Europe
KoreaFort Shafter
Schofield Barracks
Fort Wainwright
Fort Richardson
Ft. GreelyPacific
(10)
Tokyo/YokohamaAkizuki/KureZama/Sagamihara
OkinawaKwajalein
Detroit Ars
USAG Selfridge
Lima Army Tank Plt
Fort McCoy (USAR)
V
Fort Leonard Wood
Fort Riley Fort Leavenworth
Iowa AAP
Lake City AAP
VIIDugway Proving Ground
Pueblo Depot
Fort CarsonTooele AD
Deseret Chem Depot
VIII
Fort LewisYakima Training
Center
Vancouver Barracks
X -
Rock Island Arsenal
Northwest (20)
Umatilla Depot
Newport Chem Act
(except in Pacific)
21
Host Communities
EMS Identifies Priorities
Installation BASOPS MissionInstallation BASOPS Mission
Mission Mission Mission Mission
Mission Mission
MissionPriorities
MissionPriorities
MissionPriorities
Mission Mission
MissionPriorities
HostPriorities
22
EMS Integrates Mission Priorities
Installation BASOPS MissionInstallation BASOPS Mission
MissionPriorities
MissionPriorities
MissionPriorities
MissionPriorities Installation-wide
MissionPriorities
HostPriorities
23
Mission Priorities
Mission Priorities
Mission Prioriti
es
Mission Prioriti
es
Mission Priorities
Mission PrioritiesMission Priorities
Mission Priorities
Adding Mission Focus
to ISO 14001
Mission Priorities
Mission Priorities
Mission Priorities
Mission Priorities
Installation-wide Mission
Priorities
24
Inserting Mission
Environmental Aspects and ImpactsDefine ‘significance’ or priorities keyed to
sustainable & transforming operations
Defined by leadership
Limited number
Legal and Other Requirements Objectives and Targets Environmental Management Program
25
Inserting Mission
Environmental Aspects & Impacts
Legal and Other Requirements Obeying the law hasn’t changed “Other” includes mission priorities
Objectives and Targets Environmental Management Program
26
Inserting Mission
Environmental Aspects & Impacts Legal and Other Requirements Objectives and Targets
Priority impacts reflect sustainable operations Have goals, objectives, & targets for each priority
impactLimit the number
Environmental Management Program
27
Looking Ahead
EMS resourced in TIM Deliver user priorities:
Mission-focused EMS training Detailed EMS Implementation GuidanceCommander's Guide
Field-test EMS guidance Endorse DoD Policy Annual Review of EMS Steering Committee AR200-1 revision Finalize EMS Implementation Metrics Definition of Appropriate Facilities Implementation Workshop in October 02
28
www.denix.osd.mil/ems
29
Getting Started
Download ISO 14001 from DENIX EMS webpage Build it yourself
Take advantage of DA tools, awareness & templates Put best people on it & give resources Avoid ‘turnkey’ contractor packages
Do a self-assessment -- count everything Define mission & leadership priorities Start with what’s easiest or most important Don’t worry about external registration Think smart vs compliance
30
More Information
Dr. Jean ShorettODASA (ESOH)[email protected]
COL Tim [email protected]
Mr. Martin Elliott [email protected]
31
Backup Slides
32
Why a Systems Approach?