12
1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan L. Gifford, Ph.D. George Mason University School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs [email protected] 1

1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

1

The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States

The CSG Transportation Policy AcademyWashington, DC

September 17, 2014

Jonathan L. Gifford, Ph.D.George Mason University

School of Policy, Government, and International [email protected]

1

Page 2: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

2

Presentation Outline

• About Us• P3 Market Conditions in the U.S.• P3 Characteristics & Trends

– Advantages and Disadvantages– Financing: Challenges and Policy Tools– Project Risks

• Best Practices for Policymakers• Continuing Policy Discussions and P3 Evaluation

Page 3: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

3

• Research projects on P3s– Data needs for socioeconomic assessment of infrastructure P3s– Viability of multi-jurisdictional transportation P3s: an institutional framework

review– Does political contestability affect implementation of P3s?– Renegotiation of transportation P3s– Cost differences of P3s and traditionally procured highway projects in the U.S.

• White Papers– Research & policy issues white paper– Best practices white paper

• Co-sponsoring National Conference on P3s • Graduate Education: Master-level courses on P3s• Conference Participation & Outreach Activities

Center Website: p3policy.gmu.edu

Center for Transportation Public-Private Partnership Policy George Mason University

School of Policy, Government and International Affairs

Page 4: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

4

P3 Market Conditions in the U.S.

4Source: Public Works Financing

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40Number of P3 Financial Closes in the U.S. 1988-2013, by Sector

Building

Misc.

Transportation

Water

Total

Page 5: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

5

- Types of US P3 projects that reached financial close, 1986-2013

5

Source: Public Works Financing

Airport (23)

Building (60)Miscellaneous (5)

Motorway (63)

Parking (5)

Rail (30)

Seaport (8)Toll bridge (16)

Toll motorway (46)Toll tunnel (4)

Wastewater (101)

Water (43)

Water/Wastewater (50)

Airport (23)Building (60)Miscellaneous (5)Motorway (63)Parking (5)Rail (30)Seaport (8)Toll bridge (16)Toll motorway (46)Toll tunnel (4)Wastewater (101)Water (43)Water/Wastewater (50)

P3 Market Conditions in the U.S.

Page 6: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

6

P3s: Advantages & Disadvantages

6

Advantages• Utilization of private financial resources• On-budget, on-time delivery• Innovative technologies and management know-how of the

private sector• Improved operation and maintenance efficiency• Improved asset management

Disadvantages• Substantial transaction costs

– Legal, financial and technical consulting service fees – Higher interest costs in cases of private debt-financing

• Complexity makes the projects more prone to risks

Page 7: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

7

P3s: Common Financing Options

Revenue Streams• Direct User Charges (Tolls, Transit Fares, User Fees)• Public sector contribution/subsidy (e.g., Availability Payments)

Debt & Equity Sources: repaid through revenue sources• Private shareholder equity• Non taxable bonds (private activity bonds)• Taxable bonds• Bank debt (senior and/or subordinate)• State infrastructure bank loans• Federal loans

Page 8: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

8

P3s: Government Support for Financing

Equity participation: Monetary and in-kind (e.g. right-of-way) government contribution to a project

– Assures public involvement and support for its implementation and operation– Helps achieve a more favorable debt-equity ratio when other sources of equity capital

are not available or limited

Government loans: Loans with favorable terms to reduce financing costs– Subordinated loans to transportation projects with dedicated funding sources (e.g.,

tolls), but might not be fully financeable without assistance– Can account for no more than 49% of the project cost

Other policy tools:– Private Activity Bonds (PABs)– Other forms of credit support (e.g., loan guarantees, line of credit)– Performance guarantees (e.g., revenue guarantee)– Tax benefits – Protection from competition (e.g. non-compete clause)

8

Page 9: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

9

P3s: Typical Project Risks

Risks for the Developer/Contractor • Political

– Confrontational political climate: “politicizing” projects– Changes in law – Changes in political leadership

• Regulation– Permit– Environmental lawsuits

• Capital Expenditures– Project schedule overrun– Inflation / material and labor costs

• Revenue– Lower than projected traffic and toll revenue/income– Changing market conditions

• Operation & Maintenance (O&M)– Performance risk– Operating cost overrun

• Financing– Spread between O&M and revenue growth rates

Page 10: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

10

Best Practices and Readiness Indicators

10

Best Practices for successful P3s (Center White Paper, OECD Action Points)• Enabling Legislation:

– Legal basis for project development, financing, and operation

• Champions and Stakeholder Development– Importance of government, business, and community support for P3

• Project Selection and Agency Priorities– Clear and consistent procedures for the private sector; Project assessment and appraisal

norms that focus on value for money

• P3 Administering Office– Sufficient authority and staff to manage the project pipeline

• P3 Procurement Plan and Process– A credible pipeline of robust projects under consideration

• Funding and Financing– Careful selection based on risks and objectives, including investor protections and

transparency

• P3 Structures– Various approaches depending on project requirements

Page 11: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

11

Continuing Policy Discussions and P3 Evaluation

Current Status: Both successes and failures• What constitutes a P3 success?

– Distinct perspectives: citizens, policy makers, operators, investors, etc.

• Are they really achieving value for money?• Evaluation is difficult:

– Few mature US P3 concessions: Other countries have successfully used P3s to invest in infrastructure and providing social services; U.K., Canada, Australia, etc.

– Each jurisdiction is a unique market with distinct institutions

• Need for unbiased public education and more research into performance evaluation and practice improvement

Very Recent Policy Activity• The President’s Build America Investment Initiative

• Transportation Investment Center • Interagency Working Group • Infrastructure Investment Summit

• Final Report just released by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee’s Panel on Public-Private Partnerships

Page 12: 1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan

12

Center for Transportation Public-Private Partnership Policy George Mason University

School of Policy, Government and International Affairs

For more information:

Visit us at: p3policy.gmu.eduor

Find us on Twitter: #p3policy

Jonathan L. Gifford, Ph.D.George Mason University School of Public Policy

3351 Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22201 [email protected] / +1(703)993-2275