Upload
lee-mcdowell
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
What Every Product Safety What Every Product Safety Attorney Needs to KnowAttorney Needs to Know
District of Columbia Bar CLE
April 11, 2005
Edward Heiden
Heiden Associates, Inc.
2
Major Topics CoveredMajor Topics Covered
Databases ( CPSC and other)Comparative RiskProduct Recalls and Recall EffectivenessCase Studies
3
Data Bases Used by CPSCData Bases Used by CPSC
NEISS (National Electronic Injury Surveillance System)
In-Depth Investigations (IDIs)Injury and Potential Incidents FileDeath Certificate File (DTHS)NFIRS
4
National Electronic Injury National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS)Surveillance System (NEISS)
Statistically-weighted sample of 100 hospital emergency rooms
National estimates of emergency room visits for injuries associated with (not caused) by consumer products/recreational activities
Available 1980-2005Major sample revisions in 1990,1997,1999
5
In-Depth Investigations (INDP)In-Depth Investigations (INDP)
Non-statistical reports on investigations of incidents
Individual case reports – no national estimate
Details of injury, demographics, extended incident description
Primary and secondary product involved
6
Injury and Potential Incidents Injury and Potential Incidents File (IPII)File (IPII)
News clips, complaints, MECAP reports, referrals
Non-statistical summaries New source of data: retailer reporting
(Walmart)
7
Death Certificate File (DTHS)Death Certificate File (DTHS)
Info from medical examiners on fatalities related to consumer products
Overrated as a sourceAcknowledged to be incomplete
8
NFIRSNFIRS
US Fire AdministrationNational network of participating fire
departmentsIndividual case records of fire incidents
9
Other Data SourcesOther Data Sources
National Vital Statistics System (NVSS)Occupational injuries and illnesses (BLS)Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS)NHTSA recallsRecreational Boating
10
Injury EstimatesInjury Estimates
Sample change effect in injury estimates Time-trend conclusions: sample
differences affect what conclusions can be drawn
Data analysisAmusement Rides
ATVs
11
Comparative RiskComparative Risk
Sec 2 (b) of CPSA: “Purpose is to assist consumers in evaluating the comparative safety of products.”
ATV memo: adjust for use patterns to get more complete picture of “risk”.
Importance of exposure to hazardSome samples of comparative risk data
12
Sample Consumer NoticeSample Consumer Notice
Not a “One-Notice Fits All”Identify program as a recallIncident and injury infoState defect and hazardToll-free number How to obtain remedyConvenience
13
Ruger “Blackhawk” Recall Ruger “Blackhawk” Recall NoticeNotice
Not a recall – “ a unique new improvement”No incident or injury informationWhat is the defect ?Blames user for the problemNo toll-free numberConsumer has to pay shipping costs
14
Easy-Bake Mixes Recall Easy-Bake Mixes Recall NoticeNotice
Found on Toys R Us websiteManufacturers remedy information states
“should not be used if they have allergies.”FDA release states “run the risk of serious
or life-threatening allergic reaction”
15
Recall Effectiveness StudiesRecall Effectiveness Studies
1978 CPSC Study1980 CPSC StudyMurphy-Rubin Study “Determinants of
Recall Success Rates” (1983)Heiden Associates (2003)
16
2003 CPSC Study on Recall 2003 CPSC Study on Recall EffectivenessEffectiveness
A large number of steps are required before compliance with recall notice
High degree of mobility of people and products
Overcoming “information overload”
17
2003 CPSC Study on Recall 2003 CPSC Study on Recall EffectivenessEffectiveness
Role of color, lettering, signal words on levels of perceived risk
Inappropriate timingSelective screening and filteringRole of familiarity and experienceWhat specific action is required ?
18
2003 CPSC Study on Recall 2003 CPSC Study on Recall EffectivenessEffectiveness
Memory deteriorationTraffic safety poster studyBalancing of risks involved with productRisk perceptions precede the receipt of
recall message Hazard probability
19
2003 CPSC Study on Recall 2003 CPSC Study on Recall EffectivenessEffectiveness
Adults overestimate children’s abilities and underestimate risks to children in general
Acceptable riskConsumers highly sensitive to costs of
participating in recall
20
Case Study: Ames True Case Study: Ames True Temper WheelbarrowTemper Wheelbarrow
647,000 units manufactured 1993-2000 Rims explode when tires inflated –severity Recalled April 2002 Response limitations:
In use average 4 years Small # incidents Inconvenience of checking (outside) Remedy: consumer has to request and install
21
Case Study: Ames True Case Study: Ames True Temper WheelbarrowTemper Wheelbarrow
More durable notices – expand store posters to every retail outlet where sold. Publicize heavily at store level
Personalized letters to gardening magazines and gardening newspapers
Clickable banner ads Incentive Conclusion: Specialization increased returns
beyond expectations
22
Case Study: All Terrain Case Study: All Terrain VehiclesVehicles
March 2005 Hearings on risks associated with ATVs by children under 16.
ATV injury and fatality risk stable on a per-vehicle in use basis.
ATV risks comparable to risks associated with other recreational activities – look at number of injuries per 100,000 participants