Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 10 23 12 Email to @Nvbar.org 0204 Change of Address 1471
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/10-23-12-email-to-nvbarorg-0204-change-of-address-1471 1/1
ClPrint
my new address
From: Zach Coughlin ([email protected])Sent: Tue 10/23/12 11:29 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Dear Bar Counsel,
am still very afraid of retaliation by local law enforcement, and due to my status as a domesticviolence victim. In the past, I have offered to assistn you in getting me served appropriately, but haveeceived no follow up. Further, the SBN, via Investigator/Clerk Peters and otherwise have madeepresentations that I have relied upon to the extent that another certified mail SCR 105 Complaint
would be sent out shortly after my communications with Peters on September 11th, 2012 or so whereshe admitted to receiving in the mail the one she said she sent on August 23rd, 2012. Whatever theSCR 109 implications, the SBN's promises made by Peters are binding in that regard...
Nonetheless, I now feel forced to provide you my address and expose myself to even greater danger,particularly where, some might say, the SBN has a vested interest in discrediting me now, a motive, abias, some might say (I take no position in that regard at the current time). Please note my new phonenumber as well. While Mr. King has referred to some upcoming SCR 105 hearing (a "combo hearing"akin to the one's, including a Trial that DDA Young and his crew of Washoe County Public Defendershave been trying to run on me this year, including attempting to hold a Trial on May 7th, 2012 inRCR2011-0063341 where the Order finding me competent and remanding jurisdiction to the JusticeCourt in CR12-0376 was only signed, entered, and file stamped on May 9th, 2012...A big no-no underNRS 178.405 and NRS 5.010, and something Keith Loomis, Esq. needs to answer for given hiscommunications with DDA Young, the WCPD and his "work" on RMC 11 CR 26405 and 12 CR 12420.
This could be your Waterloo, so I hope you will investigate this properly. Especially considering theOrder granting Loomis' withdraw in the criminal trespass case Mr. King just filed an SCR 111 petition inoccurred during the pendency of such an evaluation on May 8th, 2011 (lots going on between May 7th-May 9th, 2012, here!) and the fact that Loomis and or the RMC ramrodded a Trial setting of June 18th,2012 on May 8th, 2012 as well, well before Coughlin's competency was determined...and to the extentKing indicates NG12-0204 and NG12-0435 rely on "Orders" entered or rendered during periods in whichNRS 178.405 and NRS 5.010 lawfully prevented their being made...well...that's no good. Please don'tmake my address public yet or disseminate it in any way.
Sincerely,
Zach Coughlin
1471 E. 9th St.
Reno, 89512
Tel and Fax 949 667 7402
