Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
1
Asymmetric Barriers
Pete White, PESystems Assessment Manager - Greenfield, INDOT
February 16, 2017
Overview What is an Asymmetric Barrier?
Median barrier with unbalanced roadway elevations
Unbalance
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
2
Overview When Do We Need to Design?
Unbalance < 2’, provide equivalent overturning resistance as standard unreinforced median barrier
Unbalance < 2’
Overview When Do We Need to Design?
Unbalance > 2’, design as a reinforced retaining wall in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
Unbalance > 2’
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
3
Overview What Shape is the Barrier?
Based on standard 33” or 45” median barrier (E 602-CCMB-04)
Overview What Shape is the Barrier?
Geometry of faces should remain standard
Standard face geometry
Standard face geometry
Width may be increased
Vertical face
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
4
Overview What Shape is the Barrier?
Joint ‘B’ spacing doesn’t apply to reinforced (i.e. > unbalance) barriers (E 602-CCMB-02)
Overview How can Resistance be Increased?
Increase width and/or embedment
Increased width will increase barrier weight; not efficient for higher loads
Increased embedment will increase passive resistance; has practical limits
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
5
Overview How can Resistance be Increased?
Add a spread footing
Spread footing increases overturning resistance by adding width and increases sliding resistance by adding weight, but increases construction complexity and excavation widths
Overview How can Resistance be Increased?
Incorporate mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) (reduces resistance demand)
MSE reduces lateral earth pressures, but increases construction complexity and excavation width
Wire Face Wall
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
6
Load Cases Case 1 – During Construction
Lower pavement not included in analysis, regardless of anticipated construction sequence
Omit lower pavement during construction to account for changes in MOT and future pavement replacement
Load Cases Case 1 – During Construction
Vehicle collision force (CT) not required if temporary barriers utilized
CTTemporary barriers shall be shown in the plans
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
7
Load Cases Case 2 – Final In-Service Configuration
Lower pavement in place and vehicle collision force applied
Lower pavement in place and providing passive resistance
CT
Vehicle collision force shall be applied to the top of the barrier, in addition to all other static loads
Loading Driving Forces
Active earth pressure (EHa), live load surcharge (LS), dead load surcharge (ESa), and vehicle collision force (CT); others as applicable
CT
ESaLSEHa
Water pressure may be omitted of adequate drainage is specified
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
8
Loading Driving Forces
Vehicle collision force (CT) varies depending on the element being designed
CT = 10 kips, for stability analysisCT = LRFD section 13, for barrier reinforcing
NCHRP Report 663 indicates that a vehicle collision force of 10 kips is appropriate for static equilibrium (overturning and sliding) analysis. Forces given in LRFD section 13 are impact loads appropriate for reinforced concrete design.
NCHRP Report 663 indicates that a vehicle collision force of 10 kips is appropriate for static equilibrium (overturning and sliding) analysis. Forces given in LRFD section 13 are impact loads appropriate for reinforced concrete design.
Loading Driving Forces
Load combinations and load factors shall be as given in LRFD Table 3.4.1.1
Load factors during construction may be reduced as appropriate, per section 3.4.2 of the LRFD Specifications
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
9
Loading Resisting Forces
Passive earth pressure (Rep), dead load surcharge (ESp), pavement passive resistance (EHpp), barrier self-weight (DLb), and sliding resistance (R)
DLb
Rep ESp EHpp
R
Sliding and passive may be used simultaneously, provided appropriate resistance factors are used (LRFD 10.5.5.2.2-1)
Passive resistance of lower pavement shall not exceed allowable compressive strength
Stability Analysis Sliding Check
Sliding shall be checked per Section 10.6.3.4 of the LRFD Specifications
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
10
Stability Analysis Overturning Check
Overturning shall be checked per Section 11.6.3.3 of the LRFD Specifications
Stability Analysis Bearing Resistance Check
Bearing resistance shall be checked per Section 11.6.3.2 of the LRFD Specifications
B’
qapplied
DLb
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
11
Stability Analysis Design Height and Length
Design height of the barrier shall not be taken as less than the average height of barrier within a 100 foot length of barrier, or the length of barrier between non-load transferring joints in the barrier, whichever is less
100’ Max.
Hmax
Hmin
Hdesign = (Hmax – Hmin) x ½
However,
(Hmax – Hdesign) ≤ 1 foot
Hdesign = (Hmax – Hmin) x ½
However,
(Hmax – Hdesign) ≤ 1 foot
Stability Analysis Design Height and Length
If at least 25 feet of the barrier within this length has an unbalanced height > 2 feet, the barrier should be designed for an unbalanced height > 2 feet
100’ Max.
Design as a reinforced retaining wall in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
Design as a reinforced retaining wall in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
25’
H = 2’
H > 2’
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
12
Reinforcing Design Barrier reinforcing shall be designed in accordance with
section A13.3 of the LRFD Specifications
CT (LRFD Table A13.2.1,
TL-4 = 54 kips,TL-5 = 124 kips)
H
Lateral earth pressures not required in conjunction with vehicle collision force
Example – Less than 2’ Calculate the overturning resistance of standard
median barrier
Pstd
H
DLb
B/2
Assumed point of rotation
Pstd = (DLb x B/2) / HPstd = (DLb x B/2) / H
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
13
Example – Less than 2’ Calculate the overturning moments due to earth
pressures and convert that to and equivalent force at the top of the barrier
Hub < 2’
LSEHa
Peq
H
Mot = (EHa x Hub/3) + (LS x Hub/2)
Peq = Mot/H
Mot = (EHa x Hub/3) + (LS x Hub/2)
Peq = Mot/H
Notes:1. Lateral earth pressure
forces should be factored
2. Upper pavement has been conservatively assumed as soil in this example
Notes:1. Lateral earth pressure
forces should be factored
2. Upper pavement has been conservatively assumed as soil in this example
Example – Less than 2’ Calculate the total required lateral moment
resistance and determine the required barrier weight
Preq = Pstd + Peq
H
Mreq = Preq x H
WTreq = Mreq/(B/2)
Mreq = Preq x H
WTreq = Mreq/(B/2)
Note:Moment resistance can
also be increased by widening the barrier instead of, or in conjunction with, increasing the barrier depth
Note:Moment resistance can
also be increased by widening the barrier instead of, or in conjunction with, increasing the barrier depth
WTreq
B/2
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
14
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 1 – During Construction
Assume an embedment depth and calculate the driving lateral forces and overturning moment
ESaLSEHa
Assume an embedment depth
Notes:1. Temporary barrier used instead of collision force2. Drainage provided instead of water pressure
Notes:1. Temporary barrier used instead of collision force2. Drainage provided instead of water pressure
d1/3
d1/2
Fdriving = ∑(i x Fi), units force/length
Moverturning = ∑(i x Fi x di), units force x length/length
Fdriving = ∑(i x Fi), units force/length
Moverturning = ∑(i x Fi x di), units force x length/length
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 1 – During Construction
Calculate the resisting forces and moments
DLb
RepR
d1/3
R DLb x tan()
Fresisting = (R x R) + (Rep x Rep)
Mresisting = (Rep x Rep x d1/3)
R DLb x tan()
Fresisting = (R x R) + (Rep x Rep)
Mresisting = (Rep x Rep x d1/3)
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
15
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 1 – During Construction
Check sliding resistance
If, Fresisting > Fdriving, Sliding resistance is adequate
If, Fresisting < Fdriving, Sliding resistance is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, or decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
If, Fresisting > Fdriving, Sliding resistance is adequate
If, Fresisting < Fdriving, Sliding resistance is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, or decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
FresistingFdriving
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 1 – During Construction
Check overturning Determine the net factored lateral load moments
Mnet = Moverturning – Mresisting (moments taken about center of barrier, B/2) Mnet = Moverturning – Mresisting (moments taken about center of barrier, B/2)
MresistingMoverturning
DLb
B
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
16
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 1 – During Construction
Check overturning Calculate the eccentricity of the applied loads and check
against the maximum allowable eccentricity
emax = B/3 (per LRFD section 11.6.3.3)
e = Mnet/DLb
If emax > e, overturning resistance is acceptable
If emax < e, overturning resistance is deficient, increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, or decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
emax = B/3 (per LRFD section 11.6.3.3)
e = Mnet/DLb
If emax > e, overturning resistance is acceptable
If emax < e, overturning resistance is deficient, increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, or decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
Mnet
DLb
eB
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 1 – During Construction
Check bearing pressure Calculate the effective barrier width due to the eccentricity of
the applied loads and determine the applied bearing pressure
B’ = B – 2e
qapplied = DLb/ B’
qmax allowable = Per geotechnical recommendations
If qmax allowable > qapplied, bearing pressure is acceptable
If qmax allowable < qapplied, bearing pressure is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, or
decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
B’ = B – 2e
qapplied = DLb/ B’
qmax allowable = Per geotechnical recommendations
If qmax allowable > qapplied, bearing pressure is acceptable
If qmax allowable < qapplied, bearing pressure is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, or
decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
DLb
B’
qapplied
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
17
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 2 – Final Condition
Using the Case 1 section geometry, calculate the driving forces and overturning moment applied over the design length of the barrier
ESaLSEHa Embedment depth from Case 1
d1/3
d1/2
Fdriving = ∑(i x Fi), units force
Moverturning = ∑(i x Fi x di), units force x length
Fdriving = ∑(i x Fi), units force
Moverturning = ∑(i x Fi x di), units force x length
CT (10 kips)
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 2 – Final Condition
Calculate the resisting forces and moments
DLb
RepR
d1/3
R DLb x tan()
Fresisting = ∑(i x Fi)
Mresisting = ∑(i x Fi x di)
R DLb x tan()
Fresisting = ∑(i x Fi)
Mresisting = ∑(i x Fi x di)
ESp
EHpp
d1/2 d1/3
Note:The passive resistance of the
lower pavement shall not exceed the allowable compressive strength
Note:The passive resistance of the
lower pavement shall not exceed the allowable compressive strength
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
18
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 2 – Final Condition
Check sliding resistance
If, Fresisting > Fdriving, Sliding resistance is adequate
If, Fresisting < Fdriving, Sliding resistance is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, barrier design length or decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
If, Fresisting > Fdriving, Sliding resistance is adequate
If, Fresisting < Fdriving, Sliding resistance is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, barrier design length or decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
FresistingFdriving
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 2 – Final Condition
Check overturning Determine the net factored lateral load moments
Mnet = Moverturning – Mresisting (moments taken about center of barrier, B/2) Mnet = Moverturning – Mresisting (moments taken about center of barrier, B/2)
MresistingMoverturning
DLb
B
Asymmetric Barrier Design 2/16/2017
19
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 2 – Final Condition
Check overturning Calculate the eccentricity of the applied loads and check
against the maximum allowable eccentricity
emax = B/3 (per LRFD section 11.6.3.3)
e = Mnet/DLb
If emax > e, overturning resistance is acceptable
If emax < e, overturning resistance is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier
weight (width), embedment depth, barrier design length or decrease driving force (MSE,
etc.)
emax = B/3 (per LRFD section 11.6.3.3)
e = Mnet/DLb
If emax > e, overturning resistance is acceptable
If emax < e, overturning resistance is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier
weight (width), embedment depth, barrier design length or decrease driving force (MSE,
etc.)
Mnet
DLb
eB
Example – Greater than 2’ Case 2 – Final Condition
Check bearing pressure Calculate the effective barrier width due to the eccentricity of
the applied loads and determine the applied bearing pressure
B’ = B – 2e
qapplied = DLb/ B’
qmax allowable = Per geotechnical recommendations
If qmax allowable > qapplied, bearing pressure is acceptable
If qmax allowable < qapplied, bearing pressure is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, design length or decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
B’ = B – 2e
qapplied = DLb/ B’
qmax allowable = Per geotechnical recommendations
If qmax allowable > qapplied, bearing pressure is acceptable
If qmax allowable < qapplied, bearing pressure is deficient. Increase resistance by increasing barrier weight (width), embedment depth, design length or decrease driving force (MSE, etc.)
DLb
B’
qapplied