10/15/20151 Sermons From Science -- May 2012 科学布道 -- 2012 年 5 月 In order to benefit the public, I now publish my Sermons from Science in both YouTube under

04/19/23 1

Sermons From Science -- May 2012科学布道 -- 2012 年 5月In order to benefit the public, I now publish my Sermons

from Science in both YouTube under the name “Pastor Chui” and also in PowerPoint slides in the website http://ChristCenterGospel.org.

The contents of this presentation were taken from various sources. May God have all the glory.

Pastor Chui

http://ChristCenterGospel.org

[email protected]

04/19/23 2

The Success of the 1905 Special Theory 1905年狭义相对论的成功 Based on the results of Michelson and Morley

(1887) and Lorentz transformation (1899), Einstein proposed the Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. To this date, no errors have been found. The M&M results in 1887 established the speed of light is immune to ether. It is a constant regardless which direction it was measured. Einstein took it as the absolute maximum speed for any motion. The 1899 Lorentz transformation has many applications. Einstein used it to develop his special theory.

04/19/23 3

The Success of the 1905 Special Theory 1905年狭义相对论的成功

The Lorentz transformation (1899) applies to motions less than the speed of light. At the speed of light, a strange result happens: The Lorentz factor is zero. Einstein seized on this fact to propose the Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. At the speed of light, a moving object will have infinite mass. Its length is zero, and its time is also zero. None of these is possible. That is why the speed of light is the absolute maximum of any object.

04/19/23 4

The Success of the 1905 Special Theory 1905年狭义相对论的成功 If the object moves much much less than the

speed of light, its motion collapses to Newton’s laws. Its mass increase is negligible. A 2200-lb moving car with a speed of 60 mph will increase its mass by about 7.7 x 10-9 lb. No instrument can detect such an increase in mass.

Length contraction is understood to be the stress on the atoms of the object as it moves near the speed of light. It has not been verified.

Time dilation has been verified both in the lab of linear accelerators and in nature.

04/19/23 5

The Success of the 1905 Special Theory 1905年狭义相对论的成功 Last November, some physicists in CERN

announced that neutrinos could travel faster than the speed of light, to the astonishment of most physicists in the world. However, this has been disproved in March 2012 by a different team of physicists in CERN. They pointed out faulty equipment and GPS calibration. Therefore, Einstein’s proposal of the absolute maximum speed of light is vindicated. So far, no exceptions have been found to violate the Special Theory predictions. Thank God for Einstein.

04/19/23 6

TAKE A BREAK

04/19/23 7

E = Mc2 is Not Einstein’s Discovery E = Mc2 不是爱因斯坦的发现 Prof. Robert A. Herrmann first reported the fact that

Einstein did not discover E = mc2 in the year 2000. Poincare published the momentum of radiation as M=S/c2

in 1900, where M is the momentum of radiation and S is the flux of radiation, from the Maxwell formula of dE/dt. Hence, for radiation, E = mc2 is a Poincare result.

In March 1904, Hasenohrl published the result: mu = 4/3 E/c2, where mu is the apparent mass, and E is the energy. He made a slight error not to include the shell in his calculation. He found E is proportional to mc2.

In Nov 1904, Einstein derived a 2-observer approach that mass would be reduced by E/c2 when it gives off radiation with energy E

04/19/23 8

E = Mc2 is Not Einstein’s Discovery E = Mc2 不是爱因斯坦的发现 Einstein, using the 2-observer view, claims that if radiant

energy L is produced by an object, then the kinetic energy from the moving observer would change by K0 – K1 = L * ((1-v2/c2) -1/2 -1). After expanding the series, the change in kinetic energy is (1/2)Lv2/c2. He states that “if a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2.” This is only an approximation.

Planck (1907) derived m=E/c2 and states that “through every absorption or emission of heat the inertial mass of a body alters, and the increment of mass is always equal to the quantity of heat divided by the square of the velocity of light in vacuo.”

04/19/23 9

E = Mc2 is Not Einstein’s Discovery E = Mc2 不是爱因斯坦的发现 Einstein’s statement of E = mc2 is invalid because Einstein

mixed two distinct observations without the relativistic alterations to arrive at an approximation.

The first complete derivation for one frame of reference is given by Planck as inspired by Poincaire.

In 1906, Einstein gave Poincaire the credit for the mass-energy equivalence for electromagnetic radiation.

According to Prof. Bartocci, Olinto De Pretto first published the expression E = mc2 in the Italian science magazine Atti in 1903.

Proper credit of E = mc2 should go to Hasenohrl, Poincaire, Planck, and De Pretto.

04/19/23 10

TAKE A BREAK

04/19/23 11

Einstein’s General Theory (1915) 爱因斯坦的广义相对论（ 1915年） Einstein published his General Theory of Relativity in

1915. He combined simultaneous 16 differential equations into one. The solutions are very demanding. A differential equation consists of variables that change either with time or with one another. Different initial conditions will lead to different solutions.

Schwarzschild solved his equations in three months by changing them into spherical coordinates. Now every black hole carries his name.

The General Theory uses space and time to describe variable conditions. Thus, time is relative and variable.

04/19/23 12

Einstein’s General Theory (1915) 爱因斯坦的广义相对论（ 1915年） The General Theory has been useful to account for the

precession of mercury, the bending of light around stars, and apparent multiple star images through deep space.

The General Theory has caused some problems in dark matter and dark energy. Only 4% of the universe is known.

The General Theory is also in conflict with Quantum Mechanics because QM uses absolute time in their equations. For over 80 years, no one can reconcile General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics because of their fundamental assumptions about time.

04/19/23 13

Einstein’s General Theory (1915) 爱因斯坦的广义相对论（ 1915年） For over 40 years, Julian Barbour of Oxford University has

been working on some higher math to remove time in their equations. Over 20 research papers have been published.

He thinks the universe is static. Expansion is an illusion, because the total energy of the universe is a constant. For the universe to expand, the total energy must increase. No such an energy has been found. In fact, it violates the conservation of matter and energy.

Robert Gentry also pointed out that the universe cannot expand based on his calculations in the separation of clusters of galaxies. The forces between two clusters of galaxies are greater than the forces between our solar system with the rest of the stars in our Milky Way Galaxy.

04/19/23 14

Einstein’s General Theory (1915) 爱因斯坦的广义相对论（ 1915年） Prof. Robert A. Herrmann has many sharp

attacks on the General Theory: “A statement such as ‘gravity curves spacetime’

is a technical statement that does not refer specifically to any physical material that is ‘bent’ or ‘curved.’ What this implies is that a test particle in ‘free-fall’ within a gravitational field follows a certain trajectory. However, in Einstein’s theory there are no physical objects that are the direct cause of such an alteration in behavior.

04/19/23 15

Einstein’s General Theory (1915) 爱因斯坦的广义相对论（ 1915年） Prof. Robert A. Herrmann has many sharp attacks on

the General Theory: “Lemaitre’s transformation and all other coordinate

transformations that have appeared since 1933 in accepted treatises on this subject claim that for this explicit physical scenario r=0 is a physical singularity and is not simply a coordinate singularity. A physical singularity is defined descriptively in various ways such as spacetime behaves in an unusual manner or the theory breaks down completely or the known laws of nature are suspended and other such statements.

04/19/23 16

Einstein’s General Theory (1915) 爱因斯坦的广义相对论（ 1915年） Prof. Robert A. Herrmann has many sharp attacks on the

General Theory: “using the Schwarzchild coordinates, that each of the

components of the Riemann tensor at points on the Schwarzchild surface =rs is finite. This is stated physically by Ohanian and Ruffini (1994, p. 440) as meaning that ‘An astronaut falling through and crossing the surface =rs will not feel anything unusual’ and this is considered as a ‘local event.’ On the other hand, the same type of analysis shows at least one of the Riemann-curvature components is unbounded at =0 and this local event is described as meaning that as an astronaut approaches this position the tidal force will destroy him/her.

04/19/23 17


General Theory: “…the formation of a naked singularity during (gravitational)

collapse would be a disaster for general relativity theory. In this situation, one cannot say anything precise about the future evolution of any region of space containing the singularity since new information could emerge from it in a completely arbitrary way. (Shapiro and Teukolsky, 1991, p. 994)

“The surface =rs is a surface of infinite redshift. A clock placed at rest near to =rs shows a proper time d= sqrt(1-rs /) dt which approaches zero as rs; that is the clock runs infinitely slow compared with a clock at a larger distance. (Ohanian and Ruffini, 1994, p. 439) … The Eddington-Finkelstein transformation (EFT) diverges at =rs; ..while the Kruskal-Szekeres transformation (KST) is not regular and not defined at =rs

04/19/23 18


General Theory: “In the EFT, a new * is defined in terms of the original and rs,

and a new ‘time-like’ coordinate V=t+*. [Notice that there are no compatible units for this V.] In the KST, two coordinates are defined. One coordinate v is defined in terms of the original , t, and rs, and a second coordinate u in terms of the same entities.

“The investigation leads to the additional statement that ‘photons can actually pass through the Schwarzchild surface in one direction and towards the center of the mass.’…The Schwarzchild solution only occupies or covers the regions I, II. The physical descriptions for the KST space is the object that has introduced the ‘white hole’ and ‘Einstein-Rosen bridge (i.e. wormhole)’ into cosmology.

04/19/23 19


General Theory: “…all observers, using whatever coordinates they like, agree on

the existence and location of the surfaces across which two-way communication is impossible (Ohanian, 1976, p. 312)… horizons represent physical coordinate-independent properties of spacetime,.. Of course, proper time is the relevant quantity for the explorer’s heart-beat and health. No coordinate system has the power to prevent him from reaching = rs (Misner et. al. 1973, p. 821) In the rest frame of a falling astronaut the amount of proper time needed to enter a black hole and crash into the singularity is not only finite, but also quite short (Ohanian and Ruffini, 1994, p. 448) The EFT and KST are not defined at = rs, that is: they are piecewise defined… In the Schwarzchild line element it is not well behaved at = rs which is divergent asymptotic behavior.

04/19/23 20


General Theory: “…a physically described property such as infinite redshift of a

light signal should not depend upon the coordinate measure or r. An observer at a large and r ‘distance,’ that when compared are ‘approximately’ the same and linearly related, would notice the increasing redshift for either coordinate representation (r,t) or (,t). If such a physical description does not depend upon an individual’s defined coordinate, then it cannot depend upon an individual’s corresponding r coordinate according to the rules.

“..it is an infinite redshift surface. This contradicts the requirement that for the Schwarzchild configuration being considered both of these surfaces should have the physical property of coinciding.

04/19/23 21


General Theory: “Technically, comparing this coordinate system with another

system in order to ‘explain’ this apparent contradiction is forbidden for it would assume that the methods used are consistent. But, an argument that might eliminate this contradiction, using this forbidden method of comparison, is that you should not use r as a ‘distance’ coordinate although the general rules don’t include such an ad hoc requirement.

“Indeed, the very Einstein-Hilbert equation with its correspondence between the energy-momentum tensor and Riemannian geometry could be totally in error. There are many present day theories that might be used to replace the Einstein theory..Such a means and a corresponding theory does exist (Herrmann, 1994b).

04/19/23 22

TAKE A BREAK

Documents

10/15/20151 Sermons From Science -- May 2012 科学布道 -- 2012 年 5 月 In order to benefit the public, I now publish my Sermons from Science in both YouTube under