Upload
mario-ayala
View
237
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 1/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
High Speed Uplink Packet Access
(HSUPA)
VS
Uplink Interference
PRINCIPLE & ES REP!R
"ith CASE SU#$
H%aei echn'l'gies C' Ltd
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 2/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
#ec *+,+
C'ntents
1 PRINCIPLE ................................................................................................ 4
1.1 High Speech Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) ............................................................ 4
1.2 Uplink Interference ......................................................................................................... 5
1.3 HSUPA VS Uplink Interference .................................................................................... 7
1.4 HSUPA Phase 1(I 1!"s) an# Phase 2(I 2"s) .................................................... $
2 TEST REPORT ..................................................................................... 10
2.1 Si"%lati&n 'es%lt fr&" H est a* ............................................................................ 1!
2.2 HSUPA &a# est 'es%lt fr&" +%st&"er,---s est *e# ............................................ 11
3 CASE STUDY ......................................................................................... 19
3.1 Pr&*le" /escripti&n .................................................................................................... 1$
3.2 Pr&*le" Anal0sis ............................................................................................................. 22
3.3 S&l%ti&ns an# 'ec&""en#ati&ns .................................................................................... 25
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 3/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference
A-stract.
This technical paper aims to give the readers the understanding about the relationship
of the HSUPA service and the uplin interference !"#PP terminology is $T%P&
Received otal "ideband Po'er()
The basic principle& test reports and case study from live net'or are included here to
give a clear vie' on ho' the HSUPA service impact on the uplin performance and ho'
to optimi*e the net'or to gain a ma+imum benefit of HSUPA)
Since HSPA service is 'idely used in the maret& 'ith a good understanding of this
topic& the engineer 'ill be able to operate and optimi*e the net'or 'ell)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 4/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
, PRINCIPLE
,), High Speech Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA)
HSUPA is introduced 'ithin release - of the "#PP specifications) It allo's increased individual
connection throughputs& increased total cell throughputs and reduced round trip times)
In Hua'ei system !$A.,/)/(& the HSUPA data channel !01DPDCH( can support either a 2 or ,/
ms TTI)
1 HSUPA Phase , ,+/s I offers the benefit of improved physical layer performance
over $33& pea rate is 2 4bps)
1 HSUPA (Phase *) */s I offers the benefit of reduced system delays and higher
potential throughput& pea rate is 5)6- 4bps)
(HSUPA I is c'nfig%red 0ia RNC 11L c'//and
SET CORRMALGOSWITCH: MapSwitch=MAP_HSUPA_TTI_2MS_SWITCH-1;)
$elease 6 of "#PP specification introduces the possibility of using 7 level Pulse Amplitude
4odulation !7PA4( 'hich e8uivalent to ,-9A4 to increase the ma+imum achievable throughput&
pea rate is ,,)5 4bps) !support in Hua'ei $A.,2)/()
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 5/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
,)2 Uplink Interference
In the %CD4A system& all the cells share the same fre8uency& 'hich is beneficial to improve the
system capacity) Ho'ever& co1fre8uency multiple+ing causes interference among the users)
The $eceived Total %ideband Po'er !$T%P( on the uplin is the sum of all user signals and the
channel noise)
Uplink Interference C'/p'siti'n is as f'll'2
N'ise 3l''r incl%de 'f ther/al n'ise and N'ise 3ig%re (N3) 'f the s4ste/ )
: ;olt*mann constant& ,)"<=
T: elvin temperature& normal temperature: 23/
%: Signal band'idth& %CD4A signal band'idth ")<74H*
.>: Hard'are !.ode;?U0( dependency& typical value of macro .ode; @" d;
If no other e+ternal factors e)g) e+ternal interference !from illegal sources(& hard'are issue) The
main factor that impact on Uplin interference is Traffic oad 'hich includes traffic load from the
users of the cell and adBacent cells)
he relati'nship -eteen %plink l'ad and %plink interference (N'ise Rise) is as -el'
! @ oad factor(
NF W T K P N
+= )l&g(1!
K J 1! 23−
( )1
1 1
11 1
TOT
N
N UL j
I NoiseRise
P i L
η = = =
−− + ∑
RTWP R!c!i"!# T$ta% Wi#!&a'# P$w!()
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 6/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
UL l'ad is affecting the n'ise le0el at the N'de 5 recei0er (N'ise Rise)
A typical value of cell load for dimensioning ranges from "/ to 6/
5/ is a good compromise bet'een the number of sites and the offered capacity)
Too high uplin noise level cause cell shrin !reduction of coverage(& breathing effect)
he relati'nship -eteen N'ise Rise and R"P (Recei0ed 'tal "ide-and P'er)
3r'/ pre0i'%s page
R"P (Recei0ed 'tal "ide-and P'er) d5 6 N'ise 3l''r (Pn) 7 N'ise Rise (Iown + Iother)
E8a/ple (9N'ise 3l''r: is 'ften called as 95ackgr'%nd N'ise;)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 7/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
1 "ith'%t 1A : .oise >loor !d;m( @ Thermal .oise!KTB,room temperature = -108dBm( E
08uivalent .oise >igure (Feeder Loss + NF_B; NF_BS- depends on Node B type, Huae!
typ!"a# $a#ue around %&0 dB'
$i*! +%$$( #,) = -1./ 0 .0 2.) = -1.3 #,
With 45 Up%i'6 L$a# $i*! Ri*!=7 #,)8 RTWP #,) = -1.3 0 7 = 993
1 "ith 1A: 08uivalent .oise >igure 'ill be reduced due to T4A)
0+ample: .> %ithout T4A: (+<7*+) d; @ 2)5d; & .>%ith T4A: ,* d;
!calculated from the formula above(
$i*! +%$$( #,) = -1./ 0 12) = -1.74 #, 8
With .5 Up%i'6 L$a# $i*! Ri*! =3 #,) - RTWP#,) = -1.7403=-1.34
#,
,)" HSUPA VS Uplink Interference
HSUPA service allo's the users to achieve higher throughput on uplin but in the same time also
increase significant interference 'hich causing the reduction of cell user access number and
impact on the overall performance)
It is great important to balance bet'een the achievable throughput and system performance on
the uplin) Therefore& Hua'ei systems apply the oad Control mechanisms to control the level of
uplin interference in each service phase)
Ei"a%!'t $i*! +i<(!
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 8/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
(ore deta!# a)out Load *ontro# #or!tms, p#ease re.er to /Load *ontro# Feature o"ument'
L'ad C'ntr'l alg'rith/s are different -eteen HSUPA and R== UL as f'll's.
, Call Ad/issi'n C'ntr'l (CAC).
>or HSUPA& P;$1based decision is used to chec 'hether the 9oS re8uirement of
e+isting users is fulfilled) The 9oS is measured on the basis of the Provided ;it $ate
!P;$( of the users) If the 9oS re8uirement is fulfilled& ne' users are allo'ed to access
the net'or)
* L'ad C'ntr'l (L#R) .
1U $33 is controlled by U D$ trigger threshold if U UU D$ algorithm is s'itch on)
1HSUPA& its scheduling is controlled by Mai Ta(<!t Up%i'6 L$a# +act$( and the
real uplin load contributed by none scheduled 0DCH users)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 9/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
A## CELLHSUPA. CellId6>Cellid? 1a8argetUlL'ad3act'r6@<2
,)7 HSUPA Phase ,(I ,+/s) and Phase *(I */s)
To ensure that the HSUPA user can access the cell& the minimum #;$ !#uarantee ;it
$ate( is recommended) %hen set the #;$ need to consider the trade1off bet'een user
throughput and cell user number )
High #;$ High user throughputHigh Uplin Interference o'er cell user number
o' #;$ o' user throughputo' Uplin Interference Higher cell user number
If 5R set in RNC 6Bk-ps
(,)
*/s HSUPA
4inimum Throughput@4AF ( one $C pdu 1bit rate , #;$ ) @
4AF ( "2/bit?2ms, -7pbs ) @,-/bps
(*)
,+/s HSUPA
4inimum Throughput@4AF ( one $C pdu1bit rate , #;$ ) @4AF( "2/bit?,/ms , -7pbs ) @-7bps
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 10/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
If 5R n't set in RNC
(,)
*/s HSUPA
4inimum Throughput @4AF ( one $C pdu1bit rate , #;$ ) @4AF( "2/bit?2ms, /pbs) @,-/bps
(*)
,+/s HSUPA
4inimum Throughput @4AF ( one $C pdu1bit rate , #;$ ) @4AF( "2/bit?,/ms , /pbs ) @"2bps
To sum up& 'ith different HSUPA TTI& 2ms and ,/ms & the minimum guaranteed throughput of
user is vary ,B+k-ps 0s Bkp-s D ,B+k-ps 0s *k-ps) So& 'hen the uplin load is limited& the
number of user that can access the cell is different !HSUPA TTI@2ms serve less number of user
per cell due to higher guaranteed throughput 'hich generating higher uplin interference()
* ES REP!R
2), Si/%lati'n Res%lt fr'/ HF est La-
HSUPA */s IG single antenna si/%lati'n (5R6Bk-ps 1a8argetUlL'ad3act'r
6@<)
>TP user number !simultaneously upload( is limited at < due to the limited capacity of air
interface !uplin interference()
UploadofAntenna %( )
Throughputkbps( )
CAT5 8 74. 43 1215. 63CAT6 8 86. 07 1163. 18
UENumber
1RX_Antenna
用户等级
HSUPA ,+/s IG single antenna si/%lati'n (5R6Bk-ps 1a8argetUlL'ad3act'r
6@<)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 11/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
>TP user number !simultaneously upload( is limited at 2/ due to the limited capacity of air
interface !uplin interference()
Upl oadofAntenna %( )
Throughputkbps( )
CAT5 20 76. 50 1100. 00
UENumber
1RX_Antenna
用户等级
2)2 HSUPA L'ad est Res%lt fr'/ C%st'/erG888s est -ed
Cell throughput and cell user number are significantly improved especially on HSUPA
Phase2 !TTI 2ms)( 'hen implemented ne' features in $A. ,2)/1I't!(>!(!'c!
Ca'c!%%ati$'IC) a'# A#apti"! R!t(a'*i**i$')
I't!(>!(!'c! Ca'c!%%ati$' +!at(! IC) aims to reduce the U interference among users
and increase the U system capacity)
Adapti0e Retrans/issi'n 3eat%re( (#4na/ic NHR) enables the system to dynamically
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 12/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
change the retransmission rate upon the Cell oad and U0 T+ Po'er)
1
%hen cell load and U0 Transmit Po'er are limited& the retransmission rate 'ill be
increased) Increasing the retransmission time re8uires less U0 T+ po'er thus
lo'er uplin interference)
1
%hen cell load and U0 Transmit Po'er are less& the retransmission rate 'ill be
decreased to completely utili*e the resources and increase the effective rate of
U0)
Retrans/issi'n UE rans/it
P'&er J
E-DN+ J C'0erage J UL
InterferenceJ
UE peak
thr'%ghp%t
Cell hr'%ghp%t
(1%ltiG%sers)
1a8 User
N%/-er
Large #o #o #ar,e #o #o -!,- more
S/all -!,- -!,- sma## -!,- -!,- #o #ess
JAt the sa/e effecti0e rate 'f UE
!Please refer to the comparisons charts of arge and Small $etransmission performance in
ne+t pages()
S%//ar4 HSUPA L'ad est Res%lt
est Case Antenna UserN%/-er Cell Load(% Cell Tput(!bps Cell L'ad(H) Cell p%t(1-ps) Cell Load(% Cell Tput(!bps
, 60% 1.90 5/D ,)3/ 50% 1.98
2 75% 1.25 65D 2)// 75% 2.30
" 75% 0.92 65D ,)</ 75% 2.20
7 77% 0.90 65D ,)7/ 75% 2.00
5 77% 1.28 65D ,)7/ 75% 1.90
- 77% 1.26 65D ,)7/ 75% 1.90
6 75% 1.09 65D ,)7/ 75% 1.70
< 77% 1.05 65D ,)7/ 75% 1.70
3 65D ,)"/ 75% 1.70
,/ 65D ,)2/ 75% 1.60
,, 65D ,),/ 75% 1.50
,2 65D ,)// 75% 1.40," 65D /)33 75% 1.40
,7 </D /)35 75% 1.30
,5 3/D ,),/ 75% 1.30
,- 32D ,)// 78% 1.20
I6,+/s 7 IC
(RAN,*)
I6,+/s 7 IC7Adapti0e
Retrans/issi'n (RAN,*)
I6,+/s
(RAN,,)
,
,RK
(Ind''r
Case)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 13/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
est Case Antenna UserN%/-er Cell Load(% Cell Tput(!bps Cell L'ad(H) Cell p%t(1-ps) Cell Load(% Cell Tput(!bps
, 70% 2.20 65D ")5/ 75% 3.90
2 75% 1.50 65D 2)2/ 75% 3.00
" 75% 1.09 65D 2)// 75% 2.407 75% 1.10 65D ,)5/ 75% 1.90
5 75% 0.91 65D ,)2/ 75% 1.90
- 75% 0.98 65D ,)2/ 75% 1.80
6 96% 1.16 65D ,),/ 75% 1.60
< 100% 1.20 32D ,)2/ 75% 1.50
3 ,++H ,,+ 75% 1.30
,/ 75% 1.20
,, 75% 1.10
,2 75% 1.10
," 90% 1.00
,7 1""% "#$
,5
,-
*
,RK
(Ind''r
Case)
I6*/s
(RAN,,)
I6*/s 7 IC
(RAN,*)
I6*/s 7 IC7Adapti0e
Retrans/issi'n (RAN,*)
est Case Antenna UserN%/-er Cell Load(% Cell Tput(!bps Cell L'ad(H) Cell p%t(1-ps) Cell Load(% Cell Tput(!bps
, 50% 1.80 7/D ,)3< 40% 1.98
2 75% 2.70 -/D ")3/ 60% 3.90
" 75% 2.25 65D ")// 75% 3.90
7 75% 2.55 65D ")// 75% 3.20
5 75% 2.15 65D ")// 75% 3.00
- 75% 1.95 65D 2)7/ 75% 3.00
6 75% 1.95 65D 2)// 75% 2.80
< 75% 1.88 65D 2)7/ 75% 2.40
3 75% ,)35 65D 2)5/ 75% 2.50
,/ 75% ,)6- 65D 2)2/ 75% 2.50
,, 65D 2)// 75% 2.50
,2 65D 2)// 75% 2.30
," 65D 2)2/ 75% 2.30
,7 65D ,)5/ 75% 2.10,5 65D ,)6/ 75% 1.90
,-
I6,+/s(RAN,,) I6,+/s 7 IC(RAN,*) I6,+/s 7 IC7Adapti0eRetrans/issi'n (RAN,*)
*R8s
(!%td''r
Case)
est Case Antenna UserN%/-er Cell Load(% Cell Tput(!bps Cell L'ad(H) Cell p%t(1-ps) Cell Load(% Cell Tput(!bps
, 75% 3.70 6/D 7)7/ 70% 4.40
2 75% 2.20 65D 5)// 75% 5.40
" 75% 1.85 65D 7)// 75% 4.20
7 75% 1.90 65D ")2/ 75% 4.00
5 75% 1.96 65D 2)5/ 75% 3.50
- 75% 1.98 65D 2)2/ 75% 2.60
6 75% 1.68 65D ,)3/ 75% 2.30
< 75% 1.71 65D ,)</ 75% 2.30
3 65D ,)6/ 75% 2.20
,/ 65D ,)3/ 75% 2.20
,, </D ,)</ 75% 1.90
,2 <5D 2)// 75% 2.00
," 1""% 1#&" 75% 1.80
,7 75% 1.70
,5 75% 1.70
,-
*R8s
(!%td''r
Case)
I6*/s
(RAN,,)
I6*/s 7 IC
(RAN,*)
I6*/s 7 IC7Adapti0e
Retrans/issi'n (RAN,*)
est Case ,. HSUPA I6,+/s ,R8 Antenna ith'%t R8G#i0ersit4 (Ind''r Case)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 14/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
est Case *. HSUPA I6*/s ,R8 Antenna ith'%t R8G#i0ersit4 (Ind''r Case)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 15/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
est Case . HSUPA I6,+/s * RKs Antenna ith R8G#i0ersit4 (!%td''r Case)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 16/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
est Case . HSUPA I6*/s * RKs Antenna ith R8G#i0ersit4 (!%td''r Case)
Reference Charts fr'/ HF (Si/%lati'n Res%lt)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 17/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
Aarge $etransmission compared 'ith Small $etransmission
!,/ms TTI(
/
5//
,///
,5//
2///
25//
"///
"5//
7///
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 51 52 53
User .muber
C e l l t h r o u g h p
/
2/
7/
-/
</
,//
,2/
C e l l A o a
Cel l Throughput Smal l Retransm ss on Cel l Throughput !arge Retransm ss on
Cel l !oa" Smal l Retransm ss on Cel l !oa" !arge Retransm ss on
Aarge $etransmission Compared 'ith Small$etransmission !2ms TTI(
/
5//
,///
,5//
2///
25//
"///
"5//
7///
75//
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 16 17 20 25 29
User .umber
C e l l T h r o u g h p u t
/
2/
7/
-/
</
,//
,2/
C e l l A o a d
Cel l Throughput !arge Retransm ss on Cel l Throughput Smal l Retransm ss on
Cel !oa" Smal l Retr ansm ss on Cel l !oa" !arge Retr ansm ss on
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 18/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
1In light cell l'ad& small retransmission can give users higher throughput than large
retransmission)
1In /edi%/ and hea04 cell l'ad& large retransmission can achieve much more user
numbers and cell throughput than small retransmissionG the gain can be 2/ "/) !;ased
on user numbers(
To achieve a ma+imum balance bet'een cell capacity and pea rate of single user in uplin
2* TTI &(i'< th! hi<h!( p!a6 (at! $> *i'<%! *!(8 whi%! 1.* TTI ca' &(i'< th!
hi<h!( c!%% capacit?) The operator can deploy another ne' feature !$A.,2)/(& HSUPA
TTI At$ R!c$'>i<(ati$' together 'ith A#apti"! R!t(a'*i**i$')
If the f'll'ing c'nditi'n has -een f%lfilled this UEs I sitch fr'/ */s t'
,+/s.
The Uu oad on Congestion StatusJ K the U0Ls bit rate M $ate threshold for
2ms to ,/ms
If -'th 'f the f'll'ing c'nditi'ns are f%lfilled this UEs I sitch fr'/ ,+/s t'
*/s.
the U0Ls bit rate N $ate threshold for ,/ms to 2ms) J
U0 Po'er is not limited) !If the -A, have been reported& the -;2 shall be
reported after that)(
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 19/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
CASE SU#$
"), Pr'-le/ #escripti'n
;ased on the customerLs feedbac in "# .et'or !$A.,/)/( of Operator FFF& the customers
had the difficulties to access the net'or &sometime can access net'or but the data throughput
is very lo' and the connections fre8uently dropped) This problem is appeared at operatorLs office
and nearby areas)
S4/pt'/s.
1;ased on the Statistic& 'e observed same pattern of high $T%P and PS drop in all cells that
circled in red)
1These cells are located in the same areas& nearby operatorLs office)
1The highest $T%P appeared in Indoor cell& CHA4CHU$IC"51, and the level of the uplin
interference of other outdoor cells reduce upon the distant from this indoor cell)
1 Uplin interference !$T%P( increase very high reached the ma+imum value at 155 d;m during
'oring hour !,/:// Q ,6:"/ hrs( on 'oring day)
1%e also conducted the >TP do'nload and upload at the Indoor cell& both give a very lo'
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 20/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
throughput)
Oer!tor"# O$$%&e
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 21/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
1ean R"P 0s HS#PA #r'p Rate (CHA1CHURIC<G,)
1ean R"P 0s 1ean n%/-er 'f HSPA %ser
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 22/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
")2 Pr'-le/ Anal4sis
Initially& 'e suspect that the uplin interference causing from the e+ternal source 'hich may
illegally use in the operatorLs building) This assumption 'as based on the interference pattern
that occurred in many cells in the same time)
In the first place& 'e did not e+pected that the issue related to traffic load due to based on
statistic& found that at the same number of HSUPA users& the $T%P didnLt al'ays high)
(a!mum =%0 HS23 users per "e##, te HS23 user num)er !s #!m!ted )y a!mum HS23
user num)er sett!n at 4N*'
r'%-lesh''ting Steps 'e had proposed 2 troubleshooting steps as belo'
!,(
Use Spectrum Analy*er to search for 0+ternal Interference source in operatorLs building
(2)
Conduct >ield Test !>TP upload( and open $.C 4T online trace measurement in the
Indoor Cell
Res%lts
!,(
There 'as no e+ternal interference detected by Spectrum Analy*er
(2)
;ased on the field test !>TP upload( and $.C 4T online measurement of indoor cell& 'e
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 23/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
detected huge increment of $T%P 'hen $33 test user doing the >TP upload !the test
user only can get $33 service due to HSUPA user number already hit ma+imum 2/
based on the setting()
est Steps
(1) Condition before start >TP upload test& based on $.C 4T online measurement of
indoor cell& the HSUPA user 'as al'ays at 2/ !HSDPA user number 'as more
than 2/( 'ith the $T%P above 135 d;m)
(2) %e started >TP Upload on $33 !from #ene+ Probe& observed the average
throughput 'as around "//bps( and the sudden increment of $T%P upto 155
d;m 'as observed via online measurement) !%e randomly checed the $T%P of
nearby outdoor cells& their $T%P also increased accordingly()
(3) .e+t& 'e started >TP Upload on HSUPA !from #ene+ Probe& observed the very
lo' throughput& most of the time 'as / bps( during that time observed no
increment of $T%P via online measurement)
(4) %e checed the oad Control parameters setting of this indoor cellG found that the
L#R (L'ad Resh%ffling) didnLt turn1on) This is the reason 'hy $.C still
scheduled bit rate to $33 users although current uplin load 'as high !above 135
d;m()
(5) >or HSUPA user& the scheduling is based on Mai Ta(<!t Up%i'6 L$a#
+act$( which *!t t$ 458 thus the bit rate 'as not scheduled to HSUPA user
conse8uently no increment of $T%P)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 24/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
() %e recommended to turned1on D$ !U: ;0 $AT0 $0DUCTIO.( for Indoor Cell
and monitor) ;ased on statistic after turn1on D$& there 'as some improvement on
$T%P and PS drop but not on data throughput) Ho'ever& high $T%P still
observed during pea hour but at shorter period than before)
G!'! P($&!
O'%i'! M!a*(!!'t LMT)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 25/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal
(7) %e suspect there might be some issue 'ith HSUPA service as 'ell !%e
implemented the HSUPA Phase2 !TTI 2ms( in this net'or( )Thus& 'e conducted
the HSUPA oad Test& to chec ho' many HSUPA user !simultaneous >TP
upload( that the cell can support)
>rom the test result& sho'n that for indoor case !'ith , $+ antenna(& only
ma+imum 6 simultaneous upload users can supported) If the HSUPA user number
is e+ceed 6& 'ill cause over1high $T%P) P%!a*! (!>!( t$ t!*t (!*%t i' p(!"i$*
*!**i$')
W! <$t c$'>i(ati$' >($ H@ that thi* i* p($#ct %iitati$'8 th! p!(>$(a'c!
$> HSUPA Pha*! 2 with 1R a't!''a i* %iit!# a'# $'%? ca' &! ip($"!#
with '!w >!at(!* (!>!( t$ p(!"i$* *!**i$'*) i' RA12.
")" S'l%ti'ns and Rec'//endati'ns
%e provided the follo'ing recommendations to operators upon this issue as follo's&
!,(
To turn1off the HSUPA phase 2 in current net'or and implement it later 'hen upgraded
from $A.,/)/ to $A.,2)/ 'ith Interference Cancellation and Dynamic .H$ features
enabled)
(2)
To upgraded capacity of indoor site by adding 2nd carrier) This is to improve user e+perience
especially on data throughput)
(3)
To turn1on oad Control !D$( to control the interference level 'hich generated from $33
users)
8/12/2019 122603490 High Speed Uplink Packet Access HSUPA vs Uplink Interference
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/122603490-high-speed-uplink-packet-access-hsupa-vs-uplink-interference 26/27
HSUPA VS Uplink Interference DocumentConfidentiality:
Internal