128. U.P vs Ligot-Telan 227 SCRA 342

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 128. U.P vs Ligot-Telan 227 SCRA 342

    1/1

    128. U.P. vs Ligot-Telan 227 SCRA 644

    FACTS:

    THE UP Board of Regents imposed on Nadal the penalties of suspension for one year,non-issuance of any certificate of good moral character during the suspension and/or as

    long as Nadal has not reimbursed the T!"P benefits he had recei#ed $ith %&'interest per annum and non issuance of his transcript of records until he has settled hisfinancial obligations $ith the uni#ersity( The disciplinary action is meted after finallyrendering a guilty #erdict on Nadal)s alleged $illful $ithholding of the follo$inginformation in his application for scholarship tantamount to acts of dishonesty, #i*+ %that he has and maintains a car and & the income of his mother in the U" in supportof the studies of his brothers( Nadal complained that he $as not afforded due process$hen, after the Board .eeting on his case on .arch &, %001 that resulted in a decisionof 2N3T 4U56T78 in his fa#or, the 9hairman of the UP Board of Regents, $ithout noticeto the petitioner, called another meeting the follo$ing day to deliberate on the9hairman)s .otion for Reconsideration, $hich this time resulted in a decision of

    24U56T7(8 Upon petition, Nadal $as granted his action for mandamus $ith preliminaryin:unction(

    ISSUE:;3N Nadal $as denied due process(

    EL!:

    No( 5t is gross error to e