Upload
syed-bahauddin-alam
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 1569377193
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1569377193 1/4
Simulation and Analysis of Advanced Nuclear Reactor and Kinetics Model
Syed Bahauddin Alam1,
Md. Nazmus Sakib, A B M Rafi Sazzad, Imranul Kabir ChowdhuryDepartment of EEE, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka
1baha [email protected]
Abstract—At the present time, considering cost factors, en-vironmental viability and unlimited resource of power, nuclearis one of the best options and in this era of energy crisis. Theinitiating postulate of energy has hairsplitting the prerequisiteof alternative reservoirs of energies other than fossil fuels. Inthis paper, Characteristic features of gen-4 nuclear reactorsand simulation and analysis of nuclear reactor and kineticsmodel has been discussed.
Index Terms—Reactivity Control, Reactor Kinetics, PARR-1,Resonance Escape Probability.
I. INTRODUCTION
For controlling reactivity, Gen-4 reactors are robust
enough.Reactivity control and its safety is treated by assimi-
lation of neutrons in the nuclear reactor [1]. In these reactors
different mechanisms are used for controlling the mechanism
of reactor core’s activity. When the water flow through the
core is increased, because of neutron moderation, reactivity
is also increased. In Gen-4 nuclear reactors heavy particle
scattering may be done because of smoothing of the reactor
process. Heavy Particle scattering from an Electron and by
this mechanism reactivity and atom speed can be controlled.
For PARR-1 Nuclear Reactor [2] Computer-Aided Testing
and simulation has evolved. In the design of thermal reactorResonance Escape Probability [3] is one of the important
factors. In a thermal reactor, most of the neutrons are im-
mersed after they have retarded to thermal energies. In most
reactor designs, various restraints ensue in this heat departure
the reactor chamber at a comparatively low temperature,
so that trivial or none of it can be retrieved as wattage.
Thermal reactors are typical to diverse escape probability.
All of the fission neutrons must eventually be absorbed
somewhere in the reactor and there having no efflux of
neutrons from an infinite nucleus. A system’s energy is
lost to its surroundings is defined as Confinement times
. In a plasma device, whether enough fusion will occur
to sustain a reaction is determined by confinement times.Thermal Utilization factor of Fusion [4], [5], [6] reactor and
Prompt neutron lifetime. For an infinite thermal reactor time
required for neutron to slow down to thermal energies is
small compared to the time neutron spends as a thermal
neutron before it is finally absorbed. Reactor kinetics model
for delayed neutrons and no delayed neutrons are twisted
with prompt neutron lifetime. Industrial applications of gen-
4 nuclear reactor are basically wide enough. Accelerator
kinetics and its models are used in the reactors for industrial
applications. Transient analysis of nuclear reactors basically
provides security information and its operating condition at
different valve position, temperature etc. In a fusion power
reactor a plasma must be exerted at a high temperature in
order that nuclear fusion can pass off. In this paper, Char-
acteristic features of gen-4 nuclear reactors and simulation
and analysis of nuclear reactor and kinetics model has been
discussed.
II. CONTROL MECHANISM OF GEN-4 REACTOR
By the commixture of Gadolinium Oxide(GdO2) and
UO2 pellets, reactivity control for counterbalancing fuel
burn up is rendered. By insuring circulation rate of flow
through the jet pumps short term reactivity commutes are
performed. When the water flux through the core is changed
magnitude, because of neutron temperance, reactivity is as
well increased. Control cruciform control vanes are required
for longer term reactivity. In the case of Reactivity Control
immersion of neutrons in the reactor fuel, secure reactivity
command is fundamentally acted. For ascertaining reactivity,
Gen-4 reactors are robust enough. In these reactors different
mechanics are exploited for operating the mechanics of
reactor core’s process. Gadolinium is transmuted into lowneutron absorption cross-sectional and by that way more
neutrons are imbibed in the reactor fuel.
Data processor (PC) accomplishes reactivity reckonings
from the static positive reactor period info for the control
rod and accomplishes online acquisition of distinct signals
exploitation of the well-known in−hour equation as given
below,
ρ = 1/T +6
1
βil + λit
(1)
where, p = scheme reactivity, T = static reactor flow, l= neu-
tron interim time period, and βi, λi the fraction and decayconstant of the ith group of delayed neutrons, respectively.
Thermal reactors are distinctive to diverse escape prob-
ability. There can be ordinal outflow of neutrons from an
infinite core; all of the fission neutrons must eventually
be absorbed somewhere in the reactor. “Resonance Escape
Probability” is one of the crucial factors out the contrivance
of nuclear reactor. If P is the probability that, a fission
neutron is not immersed in any of these resonances, then
P is the “Resonance Escape Probability”. However, some
8/3/2019 1569377193
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1569377193 2/4
Fig. 1. Testing for PARR-1 Nuclear Reactor
Fig. 2. Resonance escape probability
neutrons might be absorbed as retarding by nuclei having
absorption resonances at energies over the thermal region.
Most of the neutrons are assimilated in a nuclear reactor
subsequently decompressing to thermal energies.
P = e−N F V F I/ξMΣsMV M (2)
Fusion energy gain factor, Q is the ratio of fusion power
density to to the externally supplied power for heating unit
volume of plasma in steady state.Plasma must be maintained
at a high temperature in a fusion power reactor in orderthat nuclear fusion can occur. Various constraints ensue
in this heat imparting the reactor chamber at a relatively
low temperature in virtually reactor excogitations, so that
minuscule or none of it can be recuperated as wattage. In
these reactors, wattage is brought forth from the fraction of
the fusion power comprised in neutrons. The neutrons are
not moderated by the obtuse plasma in inertial confinement
fusion or the magnetic fields in magnetic confinement fusion
but are absorbed in a encompassing “blanket”. Imputable to
Fig. 3. Quality Factor
Fig. 4. Particle Confinement times
versatile exothermic and endothermic reactions, the blanket
may have a power gain factor a few per centum higher orlower than 100%, but that will be neglected in our scheme.
A fraction of the electrical power is re-circulated to run the
reactor arrangements. Fusion energy gain factor is,
Q =1
(1− f c)ηelectηheatf recirc(3)
f recirc < 1, because fusion power plant is to pro-
duce electricity for external consumption. The one con-
duct of energy expiration that is autonomous of the con-
finement intrigue and practically inconceivable to obviate
is Bremsstrahlung actinotherapy. Alike the fusion power
density, the Bremsstrahlung power density devolves on the
square of the plasma compactness, but it does not alter asapace with temperature.
In which 0.5 of a system’s energy is lost to its surround-
ings is defined as Confinement times. In a plasma device,
whether enough fusion will occur to sustain a reaction is
determined by confinement times. A simple expression for
the optimal confinement for the optimal confinement time
is given. In a plasma ignition, the fusion power density
that goes into heating the plasma P heat, must exceed the
power density lost to the environment, P loss. The energy
8/3/2019 1569377193
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1569377193 3/4
Fig. 5. Thermal Utilization factor of Fusion reactor
confinement times,τ E is as follows,
τ E =3nkT
P loss(4)
Where we have used the fact that the average kineticthe average kinetic energy of the electrons and ions with
3KT /2. The heating power P heat with Qfus replaced by
the kinetic energy E c of all charged fusion products for the
D-T reactions. Because not all thermal neutrons are absorbed
by the fuel, we define thermal utilization as the probability
that, when a thermal neutron is absorbed, it is absorbed by
the “fuel” (F) and not by the “nonfuel” (NF). Equivalently,
it is the ratio of the average thermal neutron absorption rate
in the fuel to the total thermal neutron absorption rate in the
fuel and nonfuel. Mathematically,
f =
f a
/
NF a
(5)
where N F /N NF is the ratio of fuel-to-nonfuel atomic
concentrations. The value of f can range from near zero for
a very dilute fuel mixture to unity for a core composed only
of fuel.
Towards heavy charged molecules with kinetic energy
(MeV range), the more minuscule separation energy of an
electron to the nucleus is trifling. Thus, a “free” electrons at
rest is that, with which an incident alpha particle interacts.
Since smoothening of the reactor operation, in Gen-4 reac-
tors, heavy particle dispersion is done. As alpha is heavy
charged particles, pass through matter and they interactthrough the Coulombic force, predominately on the electrons
of the medium as of they occupy most of the matter’s bulk.
To analyze this scattering reaction, identify particles X and
y as the electron. For this scattering process, there is no
change in the rest masses of the reactants, i.e., Q = 0. Now,
E e =
2
M + me
MmeE M cosΘe (6)
The maximum electron recoil energy and the maximum
Fig. 6. Heavy Particle Scattering from an Electron
kinetic energy loss by the incident heavy particle, occurs for
cos2Θ = 1 (7)
Thus, the maximum energy of the recoil electron is
(E e)max = 4meE M /M (8)
Virtually collisions transfer less energy from the alpha
particle, and, consequently, tenners of grands of ionization
and innervation fundamental interaction are requisite for an
alpha with respective MeV of kinetic energy to retard and
become part of the ambient medium. This is an energy
sufficient to free most electrons from their atoms and create
an ion-electron pair.
III. KINETICS MODEL OF GEN-4 REACTOR
Considering a core in which the neutron cycle takes l
seconds to complete. The alteration ∆n in the entire count
of thermic neutrons in one cycle at time t is (keff −1)n(t),
where n(t) is the amount of neutrons at the setting out of
the cycle. Thus,
dn(t)
dt=
keff − 1
ln(t) (9)
The solution of this first-order differential equation is,
n(t) = n(0)exp[keff − 1
ln(t)] (10)
where, at t = 0, the neutron population is n(0). In this
framework, the neutron population and therefore the reactorpower alters exponentially soon enough, if keff = 1 For
an infinite thermal reactor, time expected for neutron to
retard to thermal energies is minuscule equated to the time
neutron drops as a thermal neutron before it is finally
engulfed. The interim between emanation of the prompt
neutrons and immersions in nuclear reactor is called Prompt
neutron lifetime, lfp . Mean diffusion time is td.
For an infinite thermal reactor,
8/3/2019 1569377193
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1569377193 4/4
Fig. 7. Reactor kinetics
Fig. 8. Reactor Kinetics for Delayed neutrons
td =
√Π2υT (
aF +
aM )
(11)
Considering an infinite homogenous reactor whose caloric
flow must be independent of the position. For thermal
neutron time dependent diffusion equation is,
st − ΣaφT =dn
dt, (12)
dn
dt= kξ(1− β)
aφT
+6
i=1
λiC i (13)
where,
n=
Aeωτ
C =
Beωτ
The complete solution for n is,
n = n0β
β − ρeλρtβ−ρ − ρ
β − ρeρ−βlp (14)
Finally it is,
T = l p/(kα − 1) (15)
Fig. 9. Reactor Kinetics for no Delayed neutrons
where n is the density of thermal neutrons into the thermal
energy region.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
Appropriate safety measures with complimentses to nu-
clear power can emphatically and unquestionably provide
environment friendly, cost effective, sustainable solutions to
the problem of energy crisis and thereby help the world
to excise its future energy exact. Speculating about diverse
viewpoints, it is clear that, succeeding energy for the world
is nuclear. For having a carbon emission free environment,
nuclear is a just alternative. Considering the cost of energy
generation, electricity production and for replenishment of
energy crisis, energy future lies down towards nuclear. Our
analyze settles that in order to obtain a long term solution
to the ongoing energy crisis, it is important for the world to
formulate frameworks for nuclear energy based electricitygeneration in the near future. By devising and comparing
about cost factors, environmental issues, power generation
efficacy and fossil fuel replacement benefits, nuclear can be
good option as a energy source for developing countries.
REFERENCES
[1] F. Baque, G. Rodriguez, N. Jardin, J. M. Carpreau, J. M. Augem,Sibilo, J.;“Generation IV nuclear reactors - R&D program to improvesodium-cooled systems inspection” in Advancements in Nuclear Instru-
mentation Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA),pp. 1-10, 7-10 june 2009.
[2] “Computer-aided testing and operational aids for PARR-1 nuclearreactor” in Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on ,Volume: 37 Issue:3,pp. 1468 - 1477, Jun 1990
[3] “The application of digital computers to nuclear-reactor design”in :Proceedings of the IEE - Part B: Radio and Electronic Engineering,Volume: 105 Issue:22 , pp. 331 - 336 , 1958.
[4] S. J. Zinkle, ”Fusion materials science: overview of challenges andrecent progress” in (APS DPP43 Invited tutorial)
[5] G.R. Odette and M.Y. He, J. Nucl. Mater. 307-311, 1624 (2002).[6] T.S. Byun and K. Farrell, J. Nucl. Mater . 326, 86 (2004).[7] W. Sweet, “Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor” in Spectrum,
IEEE ,Volume: 34 Issue:11, pp. 41 - 48, Nov 1997.