34
THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LIMITED (SANRAL) AGENCY LIMITED (SANRAL) BUDGET BUDGET 2006 2006 /2007 AND STRATEGIC /2007 AND STRATEGIC PLAN 2006 – 2009 PLAN 2006 – 2009 Portfolio Committee on Transport Portfolio Committee on Transport 16 March 2006 #191459v2

16 March 2006

  • Upload
    stamos

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LIMITED (SANRAL) BUDGET 2006 /2007 AND STRATEGIC PLAN 2006 – 2009 Portfolio Committee on Transport. 16 March 2006. #191459v2. NATIONAL ROAD NETWORK. FOCUS AREAS 0N NATIONAL ROADS Pavement Condition. PAVEMENT DESIGN PHILOSOPY. Maintenance Actions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LIMITED (SANRAL)AGENCY LIMITED (SANRAL)

BUDGETBUDGET 2006 2006/2007 AND STRATEGIC /2007 AND STRATEGIC PLAN 2006 – 2009PLAN 2006 – 2009

Portfolio Committee on TransportPortfolio Committee on Transport

16 March 2006

#191459v2

NATIONAL ROAD NETWORKNATIONAL ROAD NETWORK

Description Non Toll State Toll BOT Total

DualCarriageway

813 280 480 1 573

4-LaneUndivided

58 251 198 507

2-LaneSingle

10 782 548 640 11 970

Total (Jan 2006) 11 653 1 079 1 318 14 050

National Road Network Length

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

YEAR

Kilo

met

re (C

ente

r Lin

e)

Non-Toll Roads Agency Toll Roads BOT Toll Roads

Pavement Age Trend

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

YEAR

Nat

iona

l Roa

d N

etw

ork

Leng

th (C

W k

m)

> 25 years 21 - 25 years 16 - 20 years 11 - 15 years 6 - 10 years 0 - 5 years

FOCUS AREAS 0N NATIONAL ROADSFOCUS AREAS 0N NATIONAL ROADSPavement ConditionPavement Condition

PAVEMENT DESIGN PHILOSOPYPAVEMENT DESIGN PHILOSOPY

0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Year

Roa

d C

ondi

tion

Good

Fair

Poor

Very Poor

Maintenance Actions

No Maintenance

Moisture Ingress

(Typically Designed for Traffic Expected over 20 Years)

COSTCOST OF MAIN OF MAINTENANCE DELAYTENANCE DELAY

0

20

40

60

80

100

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Year

Roa

d C

ondi

tion

Repair Cost = R 1,8mill / km

Repair Cost = R 0,1mill / km

Good

Fair

Poor

Very Poor

3-5 Years

Repair Cost = R 0,6mill / km

5-8 Years

(Ratio 1:6)

Ratio 1:18

IMPACT OF MAINTENANCE DELAY ON ROAD USER IMPACT OF MAINTENANCE DELAY ON ROAD USER COST (2004R)COST (2004R)

Good Poor

ArticulatedTruck

Passenger Car

R 0.00

R 2.00

R 4.00

R 6.00

R 8.00

R 10.00

R 12.00

R 14.00

R 16.00

R 18.00

R 20.00

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

International Roughness Index (m/km)

Vehi

cle

Ope

ratin

g C

osts

(R/k

m)

Very Poor ConditionPoor Condition

Good Condition

More than 100

% Increase in Road

User Costs

VEHICLES OPERATING COSTSVEHICLES OPERATING COSTS Up to 90 % of Total Transportation Costs Vehicle Operating Costs (Fuel, Tires, etc)

Standard Vehicles (i.e. HDM-4 √ ) Congestion (i.e. HDM-4 √ )

Accident Costs Value of Time (Congestion)

And Then !!!

Visual Instrumental Data

CBA

Priority List

PMSRDME

RUE

Bridge Inspections

BMSBDME

RUE

CBA

Priority List

Traffic

Projected Total Volume (Sites)No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government Total

Sm. Systems 12,000 6,600 2,100 3,000 23,700Med. Systems 6,200 3100 560 950 10,810Lg. Systems 2,650 1850 180 400 5,080Total 20,850 11,550 2,840 4,350 39,590

Projected Total Revenue (billions of $)No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government Total

Sm. Systems $1.12 $0.62 $0.20 $0.28 $2.21Med. Systems $1.59 $0.80 $0.14 $0.24 $2.78Lg. Systems $1.80 $1.26 $0.12 $0.27 $3.46Total $4.52 $2.67 $0.46 $0.80 $8.45

Super Project List

Budget OptimisationProjected Total Volume (Sites)

No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government TotalSm. Systems 12,000 6,600 2,100 3,000 23,700Med. Systems 6,200 3100 560 950 10,810Lg. Systems 2,650 1850 180 400 5,080Total 20,850 11,550 2,840 4,350 39,590

Projected Total Revenue (billions of $)No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government Total

Sm. Systems $1.12 $0.62 $0.20 $0.28 $2.21Med. Systems $1.59 $0.80 $0.14 $0.24 $2.78Lg. Systems $1.80 $1.26 $0.12 $0.27 $3.46Total $4.52 $2.67 $0.46 $0.80 $8.45

EasternProjected Total Volume (Sites)

No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government TotalSm. Systems 12,000 6,600 2,100 3,000 23,700Med. Systems 6,200 3100 560 950 10,810Lg. Systems 2,650 1850 180 400 5,080Total 20,850 11,550 2,840 4,350 39,590

Projected Total Revenue (billions of $)No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government Total

Sm. Systems $1.12 $0.62 $0.20 $0.28 $2.21Med. Systems $1.59 $0.80 $0.14 $0.24 $2.78Lg. Systems $1.80 $1.26 $0.12 $0.27 $3.46Total $4.52 $2.67 $0.46 $0.80 $8.45

SouthernProjected Total Volume (Sites)

No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government TotalSm. Systems 12,000 6,600 2,100 3,000 23,700Med. Systems 6,200 3100 560 950 10,810Lg. Systems 2,650 1850 180 400 5,080Total 20,850 11,550 2,840 4,350 39,590

Projected Total Revenue (billions of $)No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government Total

Sm. Systems $1.12 $0.62 $0.20 $0.28 $2.21Med. Systems $1.59 $0.80 $0.14 $0.24 $2.78Lg. Systems $1.80 $1.26 $0.12 $0.27 $3.46Total $4.52 $2.67 $0.46 $0.80 $8.45

NorthernProjected Total Volume (Sites)

No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government TotalSm. Systems 12,000 6,600 2,100 3,000 23,700Med. Systems 6,200 3100 560 950 10,810Lg. Systems 2,650 1850 180 400 5,080Total 20,850 11,550 2,840 4,350 39,590

Projected Total Revenue (billions of $)No. America Europe Asia-Pacific Government Total

Sm. Systems $1.12 $0.62 $0.20 $0.28 $2.21Med. Systems $1.59 $0.80 $0.14 $0.24 $2.78Lg. Systems $1.80 $1.26 $0.12 $0.27 $3.46Total $4.52 $2.67 $0.46 $0.80 $8.45

Western

Programming Programming Programming Programming

Pavement Management System Bridge Management System

SANRAL BUDGETING PROCEDURESANRAL BUDGETING PROCEDURE

OptimisationOptimisation Function Function Minimization of Total Transportation Costs (High Traffic)Minimization of Total Transportation Costs (High Traffic)

Agency Expenditure

Road

Use

r Cos

ts

Road User Costs Agency Total Transportation Costs

Minimum Total Transportation Costs

PRINCIPLE KEY OBJECTIVESPRINCIPLE KEY OBJECTIVES

The management of a primary road network ensuring best value for money.

Continuously improving the efficiency of business practices.

Maintain market confidence. Carry out Governments targeted programmes to better

the life of all citizens. Safe roads for all. To work in partnership with road users, transport

providers relevant authorities and the private sector.

PRINCIPLE KEY OBJECTIVES …Cont.PRINCIPLE KEY OBJECTIVES …Cont.

To be a good employer managing the SANRAL’s business efficiently and effectively and seeking a continuous improvement.

Achieving international best practices. Encouraging innovation in knowledge and

practice. Research, discover and excel. Marketing of our solutions to road users.

Multiplier effect of Investment in RoadsMultiplier effect of Investment in Roads

Transport Project / Programme

Change in costs, markets for directly affected businesses

Direct Effect: Change in Business Activity (output)

Induced effects (consumer business

Indirect effects (supplier business)

Retain Earnings, (profits, reinvest)

Pay workers (wages)

Purchase supplies (capital inputs) Multiplier

effects on business

• Regional output (business sales)

• Wages (personal income)

• gross regional product (value added)

• Jobs (employment)

Overall Growth of Business Activity

Sum of direct, indirect & induced effects

OUTCOMESOUTCOMES

AREA OUTCOMES

Tourism/ Long Distance

i. Road institutional policy and capacity management

ii. Cost structure of public transport operators

Rural iii. Long term road investment sustainability

OUTCOMES …Cont.OUTCOMES …Cont.

AREA OUTCOMES

Urban iv. Attractive public transport system by making road

public transport “friendly”v. High system cost public transport

Freight vi. Seamless movementvii. Inter-modal systems

Safety and Environment

viii. Safe roadsix. Reduce incidents

Capacity x. Address basic skills gap

PERFORMANCE INDICATORSPERFORMANCE INDICATORSRoad NetworkRoad Network

SMOOTH TRAVEL EXPOSURE (STE)

Purpose: To monitor whether roads are providing acceptable travel conditions.

Target: 95% of travel on less than 4,2m/km roughness.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORSPERFORMANCE INDICATORSRoad Network …Cont.Road Network …Cont.

LOW RUT EXPOSURE (LRE)

Purpose: To monitor whether roads are providing acceptable travel conditions.

Target: 95% of travel on less than 20mm rut depth.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORSPERFORMANCE INDICATORSRoad Network …Cont.Road Network …Cont.

HIGH TEXTURE EXPOSURE (HTE)

Purpose: To monitor whether roads are providing acceptable travel conditions.

Target: 95% of travel on higher than 0,4 mm texture.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORSPERFORMANCE INDICATORSRoad Network …Cont.Road Network …Cont.

BRIDGE CONDITION EXPOSURE (BCE)

Purpose: To monitor whether bridges are providing acceptable travel conditions.

Target: 90% of travel over and under bridges with OCI higher than 80.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORSPERFORMANCE INDICATORSFinancial …Cont.Financial …Cont.

EXPENDITURE EFFICIENCY INDEX (EEI)

Purpose: To monitor the efficiency of the SANRAL.

Target: ≤ 5%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORSPERFORMANCE INDICATORSFinancial …Cont.Financial …Cont.

PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT INDEX (PSII)

 Purpose: To monitor the attraction of private sector investment.

Target: 0,85

How do we go to the next level? Develop a SANRAL Culture of Emphasis on Road

Safety in all we do. Efficient co-ordination and management of

resources to focus on road safety Results driven

It is with this in mind that a Road Safety Management System is proposed for SANRAL.

Proposed SANRAL road safety strategyProposed SANRAL road safety strategy

Although SANRAL does a lot of good road safety work, there is a need for a more co-ordinated approach towards road safety.

A Road Safety Management System is proposed. What is a Safety Management System?

Approach to road safety followed by road authorities internationally. Widely supported method of managing the road network to improve

safety. Is an integral part of the overall management system for the road

network.

Proposed SANRAL road safety strategyProposed SANRAL road safety strategy

Safety Management SystemSafety Management System

How does a SMS work?

SafetyStrategy

(SANRAL Board)

Operational Plan(SANRAL Staff and Service Providers)

Safety Performance Indicators

Tactical Planning(SANRAL Road Safety

Cluster)

DIRECTION

MEANS OF DELIVERY

CONTROL

REVIEW

Current SANRAL road safety initiatives: Current SANRAL road safety initiatives: EngineeringEngineering

Routine road maintenance Collation of accident statistics Safety maintenance (potholes, fencing, guardrails,

road marking etc.) Safety improvements on periodic maintenance

projects Special road safety projects

SANRAL safety initiatives through Routine Road Maintenance contracts

Safety improvements as part of Periodic Maintenance contracts 2+1 re-marking Cable barrier Addition of right-turn lanes Etc.

Current SANRAL road safety initiatives: Current SANRAL road safety initiatives: EngineeringEngineering

Special safety projects:

Current SANRAL road safety initiatives: Current SANRAL road safety initiatives: EngineeringEngineering

Barrier Walls Truck Stops

Arrestor Beds

Pedestrian Bridges

Current SANRAL road safety initiatives: Current SANRAL road safety initiatives: EnforcementEnforcement

Agreements with provincial road traffic inspectorates Traffic Control Centres

THE NEED FOR IMSTHE NEED FOR IMS

The trend for commercial transportation on South African roads, has steadily increased over the years.

The same can also be said for non-commercial vehicles.

Unfortunately the above can be linked to standard of safety on roads.

Every year our roads have their fair share of incidents which result with road closure, loss of lives, damage to property, at huge costs to all involved

Where incidents cannot be prevented at least they should be efficiently managed

THE OBJECTIVES THE OBJECTIVES OF IMSOF IMS

Enable Managers to secure agreements among emergency services

Allow for facilitation of on-scene co-ordination and co-operation between emergency services

Streamlining of communication Ensure that incidents are cleared as quickly as

possible.

THE ACHIEVEMENT OF IMS THE ACHIEVEMENT OF IMS

Programming and Pre-planning (Guidelines and Protocols)

Resources allocation and management Communication/Communication Technology

improvements Capacity building, skills development and

training System maintenance, monitoring, reporting

and evaluation