17 Gibberellic Acid Increases Secondary Metabolite Production in Echinacea purpurea Hairy Roots

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2012 Research

Citation preview

  • Gibberellic Acid Increases Secondary MetaboliteProduction in Echinacea purpurea Hairy Roots

    Bilal H. Abbasi & Amanda R. Stiles &Praveen K. Saxena & Chun-Zhao Liu

    Received: 6 June 2012 /Accepted: 3 October 2012 /Published online: 18 October 2012# Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

    Abstract Gibberellic acid (GA3) is reported to have diverse effects on hairy root cultures ofmany plant species; therefore, the effects of GA3 on the growth, secondary metaboliteproduction (caffeic acid derivatives and lignin), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activ-ity, and free radical scavenging activity of light-grown Echinacea purpurea L. hairy rootswere investigated. Eight concentrations of GA3, ranging from 0.005 to 1.0 M, were addedto shake flask cultures. The moderate GA3 concentration, 0.025 M, resulted in the highestconcentrations of cichoric acid, caftaric acid, and chlorogenic acid, as well as increased PALactivity, cell viability, and free radical scavenging activity, while higher and lower GA3concentrations resulted in reduced levels compared to the control (lacking GA3). Themoderate GA3 concentration also affected root morphogenesis; supplementation with0.025 M GA3 resulted in the development of thick, dense, purple-colored roots, whileroots exposed to the higher and lower concentrations of GA3 were thin and off-white. Thisstudy demonstrates that supplementation with GA3 may be an excellent strategy to optimizethe production of secondary metabolites from E. purpurea hairy root cultures; however, theGA3 concentration is a critical factor.

    Keywords Echinacea purpurea . Hairy roots . Cichoric acid . Anthocyanins . GA3 . Light

    Introduction

    Echinacea purpurea L. is a traditional herbal medicine used to treat a wide range of medicalconditions, but is most commonly used to prevent colds and upper respiratory infections by

    Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2012) 168:20572066DOI 10.1007/s12010-012-9917-z

    B. H. Abbasi : A. R. Stiles : C.-Z. LiuNational Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, Peoples Republic of China

    P. K. SaxenaGosling Research Institute for Plant Preservation and Department of Plant Agriculture,University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

    C.-Z. Liu (*)National Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, Peoples Republic of Chinae-mail: [email protected]

  • stimulating the immune system [1]. It is one of the most accepted herbal medicines, with aworldwide market of approximately US$1.3 billion per annum [2]. However, because it is anout-crossing species, there is a significant amount of genetic, morphological, and phyto-chemical diversity present among individual plants and plant populations. As a result,commercial Echinacea products display an exceptionally high degree of variability in thelevel of various marker compounds, and clinical trials have produced conflicting results. Toaddress this issue, the development of methods to produce consistently high-quality plantmaterial with a known chemical profile is needed.

    Caffeic acid derivatives (CADs) are biologically active components found in E. pur-purea. Cichoric acid is considered to be the most important CAD for the medicinal value ofE. purpurea [2, 3]. It has demonstrated phagocytic, antihyaluronidase, and antiviral activity,and it also inhibits HIV-1 integrase and replicase [4]. CADs are currently extracted fromwild-grown E. purpurea because its synthesis is difficult, expensive, and time consuming.Therefore, the development of in vitro tissue culture techniques for E. purpurea remains thefocus of considerable research attention [5]. Hairy root cultures are a promising in vitrosource for the consistent production of biomass and secondary metabolites in many medic-inal plant species due to their biochemical and genetic stability [2]. Several reports onAgrobacterium-mediated transformation of E. purpurea are available [2], but few demon-strate the capacity to produce CADs [2, 3, 6]. In this work, E. purpurea hairy roots,generated from a variety indigenous to South American and known to be a high CADsproducer, especially of cichoric acid, were utilized.

    One method for increasing phytochemical yield in in vitro systems is the applica-tion of exogenously applied phytohormones [7], which have been shown to affectphysiological and metabolic processes in plant cell and organ cultures of severalspecies [7, 8]. The application of GA3 has resulted in a variety of growth effects;cell elongation; the modulation of enzymes activities such as phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL), chlorophyllase, and peroxidase; and changes in the metabolism andaccumulation of anthocyanins, glutathione, flavonoids, lignin, proteins, and starch[9]. The application of GA3 alone or in combination with paclobutrazole and uni-conazole to in vitro-grown Echinacea plants increased the accumulation of caftaricand cichoric acid in roots (with negligible effects on their accumulation in shoots) [5].GA3 has also been shown to stimulate the growth of hairy roots in various specieswith a varying degree of secondary metabolite production [8, 10].

    E. purpurea hairy roots grow well in hormone-free media [2, 6], but the effects ofexogenous plant growth regulators have not yet been tested. The goal of this study was toanalyze the effect of GA3 on the growth and CADs biosynthesis in Echinacea hairy rootcultures over time and to evaluate the effect of GA3 on culture viability, PAL enzymeactivity, lignin biosynthesis, and free radical scavenging activity.

    Materials and Methods

    Hairy Root Culture and GA3 Treatment

    Establishment of the E. purpurea hairy root cultures was conducted as previously reported[2]. Briefly, hairy roots were induced by transformation with Agrobacterium rhizogenesstrain ATCC 43057 (ATCC, Manassas, Virginia, USA) from leaf explants of 28-day-oldseedlings germinated from E. purpurea seeds (Richters, Goodwood Ontario, Canada).Hairy root cultures were maintained at 251 C in the dark and subcultured at 21-day

    2058 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2012) 168:20572066

  • intervals. The roots were cultured in 50 ml MS [11] basal media with full strength salts and30 g/l sucrose, and the medium was adjusted to a pH of 5.8 prior to autoclaving.

    All experiments were performed in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 ml mediainoculated with 1 g of 21-day-old hairy roots (approximately 2 cm long segments). Theflasks were incubated on a rotary shaker set at 105 rpm and 251 C under continuous light(60 mol/m2/s). In the initial screening, GA3 was added to the culture medium at a range ofconcentrations (0.005, 0.0075, 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 M), and three concen-trations were used for later experiments (0.005, 0.025, and 1.0 M). However, for clarity, forall experiments, data are presented for just three concentrations (0.005, 0.025, and 1.0 M).

    Analytical Methods

    To determine fresh weight, the hairy root cultures were gently pressed on filter paper toremove excess water and weighed. Subsequently, the roots were dried in an oven at 60 C for24 h and dry weights were recorded.

    The PAL activity was determined according to the method of Koukol and Conn [12] withone unit of activity corresponding to an absorbance variation of 0.01. Cell viability wasestimated by the reduction of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride [13]. The viability indexwas defined as the absorbance measured per gram of fresh tissue.

    Anthocyanin analysis was conducted according to the method of Harborne [14] using aShimadzu UVVIS spectrophotometer. Extraction and quantification of CADs from thedried hairy root cultures were carried out using the method described by Liu et al. [2]. Ligninwas determined according to the method of Goering and Soest [15].

    Eight to ten root cross sections were prepared from light- and dark-grown hairy rootcultures using a modification of the method of Rieger and Litvin [16]. Briefly, root sampleswere preserved in formaldehyde, acetic acid, and ethanol (10:5:85, by volume) and dehy-drated in ethanol prior to embedding in resin (Historesin). Cross sections (810 m thick)were excised from 10 to 30 mm behind the root tip to study differentiation. Roots werestained with either aniline blue or safranin and photographed with a calibrated lengthreference using the Nikon microscope at 2040 magnification.

    The capacity of prepared extracts to scavenge free radicals (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl,DPPH) was monitored according to the method of Amarowicz et al. [17]. Briefly, 2.0 mg ofhairy root extracts was dissolved in 4 ml of methanol and added to a methanolic solution ofDPPH (1 mM, 0.5 ml). The mixture was vortexed for 15 s and then left at room temperature for30min. The absorbance of the resulting solutionwas measured at 517 nm. Amethanolic DPPHsolution (2 mg of BHA dissolved in 4 ml of methanol with 0.5 ml of DPPH solution) that haddecayed (no longer exhibited a purple color) was used for the background correction. Theradical scavenging activity was calculated as a percentage of DPPH discoloration using theequation: % scavenging DPPH free radicals0100(1AE/AD), in which AE was the absor-bance of the solution when the extract had been added and AD was the absorbance of theDPPH solution with no added extract.

    Statistical Analyses

    Triplicate flasks were used in all experiments, and the experiments were repeated twice. Alldata were the meanstandard deviation. The data were subjected to a one-way analysis ofvariance. Tukey-HSD test was used for calculation of significant differences. SPSS (forWindows, standard version 7.5.1 by SPSS Inc. Chicago) was used to determine the signif-icance at p

  • Results and Discussion

    GA3 is reported to have a physiological effect at concentrations ranging from 109 to 105M

    [18]; therefore, we studied the effect of GA3 on Echinacea hairy root cultures at eightconcentrations ranging from 0.005 to 1.0 M. The GA3 concentrations ranging from 0.01 to0.1 M increased the secondary metabolite production, PAL activity, and cell viability incomparison with the control. The concentration of 0.025 M GA3 had the strongest effect;therefore, for clarity, the data are shown for the control (lacking GA3), the lowest concentration(0.005 M), a moderate concentration (0.025 M), and the highest concentration (1.0 M).

    Effects of GA3 on the Growth and Morphology of E. purpurea Hairy Roots

    The application of GA3 has been shown to affect hairy root cultures of several plant species[10, 19], and an earlier study by Jones et al. [5] demonstrated that changes in GA3metabolism influence the production of cichoric acid and caftaric acid in Echinacea plantletsgrown in vitro. In the current study, we evaluated the effects of GA3 on growth kinetics andsecondary metabolite production in E. purpurea hairy root cultures. The hairy roots treatedwith the moderate GA3 concentration (0.025 M) achieved a higher biomass than theuntreated control (Fig. 1a), and both the low (0.005 M) and moderate (0.025 M) GA3concentrations resulted in a lower biomass than the untreated control. Moderate concen-trations of GA3 similarly increased biomass in hairy root cultures of other plant species [10]and increased shoot and root biomass in potted maize plants [20].

    There was a direct relationship between the culture biomass and cell viability: as the biomassincreased, the cell viability index increased (Fig. 1a, b). At the high GA3 concentration(1.0 M), the culture viability was higher after day 45; this may indicate that higher concen-trations of GA3 reduce the growth rate and alter the timing of the log phase (Fig. 1b). Lowviability is a sign of reduced metabolic activity associated with mitochondrial function andrespiration, which ultimately leads to cell death [21]. Cell viability is also linked to stress-enhanced cell permeabilization. Thus, continued research on the relationship between rootmorphology and physiology is important to improve our understanding of root dynamics.

    The GA3 concentration impacted the anatomy of the E. purpurea hairy roots; thin rootswere produced at the high GA3 concentration (1.0 M), thicker roots were produced at themoderate GA3 concentration (0.025 M) (Fig. 2), and the root diameter at the low GA3concentration (0.005 M) was not statistically different from the control (data not shown).GA3 impacts cell elongation and expansion, and this may account for the changes in growthand root diameter. Similarly, Baluska et al. [22] observed a significant effect of GA3 on rootgrowth and cell size in treated maize roots, and a reduction in root diameter in response toGA3 has also been reported in several grape cultivars [23]. These observations may indicatea common initial response to GA3 treatment, including a slackening of the cell wall whichresults in a decrease in the overall growth rate, depending on the physiological age of thecells. When the cells are dynamic, the cell wall slackening permits rapid development,whereas when they are strained, the metabolic activity cannot keep pace with the transientextension, resulting in a drop in turgor pressure in the stressed cells.

    Previously, light was reported to induce purple coloration in E. purpurea hairy roots dueto the accumulation of anthocyanins [6]. In the present study, GA3 had a considerable effecton the accumulation of light-induced anthocyanins; anthocyanin accumulation was en-hanced in cultures grown in 0.025 M GA3 while cultures grown at 0.005 and 1.0 Mwere lighter in color compared to the control (Fig. 3). These data indicate that GA3 inhibitedanthocyanins accumulation at higher concentrations. The impact of GA3 on color has also

    2060 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2012) 168:20572066

  • been reported for other plant species such as Vitis [21]. Formation of anthocyanins, whichmitigated light-induced oxidative stress, was also reported in plant cell cultures; Ilan andDougall [24] demonstrated that GA3-treated carrot cell cultures did not exhibit chalconesynthase activity, which is necessary for anthocyanin biosynthesis. However, Teszlak et al.[21] found that in grape, the anthocyanin content was significantly increased by GA3application. These studies indicate that GA3-induced anthocyanin accumulation is speciesand concentration specific. In the current study, fluctuations in the levels of anthocyaninaccumulation led us to quantify the levels of antioxidative enzyme activity in order toexamine the interaction of GA3 and light-induced oxidative stress. Highly differentiatedroots possess higher levels of secondary metabolites [6].

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 550

    4

    8

    12

    16

    c

    bbb

    c

    d

    eeefef

    bcb

    c

    deed

    c

    bcab

    bcbc

    efe

    de

    c

    bc

    abab

    Dry

    biom

    ass

    (g/l)

    Days

    Control 0.005 0.025 1.0

    aa

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 550

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    cdcd

    bcccd

    ddde

    bbcdcd

    dde

    ee

    ef

    bbb

    ded

    cbc b

    ab

    Control 0.005 0.025 1.0

    Viab

    ility

    of

    cu

    lture

    s

    Days

    b

    a

    Fig. 1 a Growth kinetics and b cell viability of E. purpurea hairy root cultures grown in MS media with orwithout GA3 supplementation for 50 days. Values are the means of triplicate samplesstandard deviation.Means with different letters are statistically different from the control at p0.05 according to Tukeys HSD test

    Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2012) 168:20572066 2061

  • Effects of GA3 on CADs Production

    In some plant species, GA3 is reported to affect the concentrations of phenolic substances[9, 23]; therefore, we measured the levels of CADs, phenolic substances derived from phenyl-propanoid metabolism, in the hairy root cultures [6, 25]. GA3 affected the accumulation ofcichoric acid, caftaric acid, and chlorogenic acid but did not affect caffeic acid (Fig. 4ad).Exposing the cultures to the moderate GA3 concentration (0.025 M) significantly enhancedthe accumulation of the principal CAD, cichoric acid (Fig. 4a), and the maximum level ofcichoric acid accumulated as the hairy roots entered the late stationary phase of growth. Cellsmanufacture primary compounds that are required for the biosynthesis of cell componentsduring the exponential growth phase [2], and when nutrients are exhausted and waste productsare excreted by cells into the medium, the metabolism switches from primary to secondarymetabolism [10]. Therefore, biologically active metabolites are commonly not produced insignificant quantities until the culture enters stationary phase. In a study by Jones et al. [5], theconcentrations of CADs in the Echinacea plantlets were not significantly different fromcontrols toward the end of the treatment period, potentially indicating degradation of GA3 oracclimatization of the tissues to the inductive stimulus. In a previous study, the highest

    Control 0.005 M 0.025 M 1.0 M

    Fig. 2 Effects of GA3 supplementation in MS media on the anatomy and diameter of E. purpurea hairy rootsat day 35. Bar0300 m

    460 480 500 520 540 560 580 6000.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    Abs

    orb

    ance

    Wavelength

    0.025

    Control0.005

    1.0

    GA3 ( M)Fig. 3 Absorption spectra ofanthocyanins extracted from 45-day-old E. purpurea hairy rootsgrown with or without GA3 sup-plementation in MS media

    2062 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2012) 168:20572066

  • concentrations of cichoric acid were also present in the purple-colored flowers and E. purpurearoot stock [2, 6], which is in accordance with the data presented in the current study. Theaccumulation of caftaric acid was enhanced only with 0.025 M GA3, while 1.0 M GA3inhibited the production of caftaric acid compared to 0.005 M GA3 and the control (Fig. 4b).The maximum accumulation of both caftaric acid and cichoric acid occurred on day 45.Chlorogenic acid accumulation was stimulated by both the low (0.005 M) and moderate(0.025 M) GA3 concentrations (Fig. 4c), while the accumulation in response to the high GA3concentration was similar to the control until day 40 and then increased. Sharaf-Eldin et al. [9]studied the effects of GA3 on chlorogenic acid and cynarin in Cynara cardunculus leaves andconcluded that GA3 affected chlorogenic acid more than cynarin. Exposure to GA3 did not havea significant effect on caffeic acid accumulation in the present study (Fig. 4d).

    Lignin is present in nearly all nonaquatic higher plants as an essential component of thedifferentiated cell wall. It is lignin which provides roots with strength and rigidity. BecauseGA3 is known to promote cell elongation and increase cell wall plasticity, we investigated itseffect on lignification in the hairy root cultures. At the moderate GA3 concentration(0.025 M), the lignin concentration was significantly higher than the control, while thehigher and lower GA3 concentrations were not significantly different (Fig. 5). The timecourse indicated that the enhanced lignification occurred primarily following the exponential

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 550

    8

    16

    24

    32

    40

    ef efe

    ded

    cdc

    c

    bc

    cddde

    efefefeff

    ef ee de d

    d cdbc

    bbc

    b

    ede

    d cdc

    bcbc

    aa

    Control 0.005 0.025 1.0

    Cich

    oric

    acid

    (mg/

    g DW

    )

    Days

    aa

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 550

    4

    8

    12

    de de de

    ccc

    cddede de

    de dd d

    cdc

    cc

    d dcd cd

    c cbc

    bb b

    cd cdc c

    c bcb

    aab

    Control 0.005 0.025 1.0

    Cafta

    ric ac

    id (m

    g/g

    DW)

    Days

    b

    a

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 550

    4

    8

    12

    d d dd cd

    cd

    d dcd

    cdcdd

    dddddede d

    d dcd cd

    c c

    bcb

    cbc bc

    b ab aba

    Control 0.005 0.025 1.0

    Chlo

    roge

    nic

    acid

    (mg/

    g DW

    )

    Days

    c

    a

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 550.00

    0.01

    0.02 Control 0.005 0.025 1.0

    Caffe

    ic ac

    id (m

    g/g

    DW

    )

    Days

    d

    Fig. 4 Time course of the accumulation of caffeic acid derivatives in E. purpurea hairy root cultures grown inMS media with or without GA3 supplementation for 50 days: a cichoric acid; b caftaric acid; c chlorogenicacid; and d caffeic acid. Values are means of triplicate samplesthe standard deviation. Means with differentletters are statistically different from control at p0.05 according to Tukeys HSD test

    Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2012) 168:20572066 2063

  • growth phase, but GA3-enhanced lignification had no direct relation to GA3-promotedgrowth (Fig. 1a). Neves et al. [26] demonstrated that in soybean, enhanced lignin productionsolidifies the cell wall and restricts root growth.

    Biosynthesis of phenolic acids involves the induction of PAL, the enzyme that catalyzesthe first metabolic step in phenylpropanoid metabolism and the production of secondarymetabolites [27]. The reported correlation between application of GA3, PAL activity, andsynthesis of phenylpropanoids such as anthocyanins and lignin [6, 28] led us to investigatethe effect of GA3 on PAL in the E. purpurea hairy root cultures. The moderate GA3concentration (0.025 M) significantly enhanced PAL activity compared to the control,while the other GA3 concentrations significantly decreased it (Fig. 6). This indicates that theincrease in anthocyanins, CAD accumulation, and lignin content are related to PAL activity

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 550

    5

    10

    cc

    cdcdcdcdcddddee

    de dd cd

    cd cdc

    cc c

    cd cdc

    c bcbc b

    aa

    Control 0.005 0.025 1.0

    Lign

    in (%

    DW

    )

    Days

    a

    Fig. 5 Time course of lignin bio-synthesis in E. purpurea hairyroot cultures grown in MS mediawith or without GA3 supplemen-tation for 50 days. Values aremeans of triplicate samplesthestandard deviation. Means withdifferent letters are statisticallydifferent from control at p0.05according to Tukeys HSD test

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 550

    300

    600

    900

    1200

    1500

    cc

    c

    c

    cdde

    e

    ef

    e

    e

    cdc

    b bb

    fef

    e

    e

    d

    cb

    a

    Control 0.005 0.025 1.0

    PAL

    (U/g

    FW

    )

    Days

    a

    Fig. 6 Time course of phenylala-nine ammonia lyase (PAL) activ-ity in E. purpurea hairy rootcultures grown in MS media withor without GA3 supplementationfor 50 days. Values are means oftriplicate samplesthe standarddeviation. Means with differentletters are statistically differentfrom control at p0.05 accordingto Tukeys HSD test

    2064 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2012) 168:20572066

  • in E. purpurea hairy roots, a finding that has been demonstrated in several other E. purpureastudies [6]. GA3 treatment in pea plants and Jatropa curcas also increased PAL activity [29]but inhibited it in others [30], although the combination of GA3 with uniconazole lessenedthis inhibitory effect [31].

    DPPH scavenging activity has been shown to correlate with cichoric acid and caftaricacid accumulation; however, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, and anthocyanins also contribute(Fig. 7). Pellati et al. [32] and Tsai et al. [33] found that cichoric acid had a higher freeradical scavenging activity due to the presence of two adjacent hydroxyl groups on each ofits phenolic rings, while chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid have lower scavenging activitydue to the presence of only one phenolic ring for the hydroxyl groups. Taveira et al. [34]found antioxidant activity in Brassica shoots due to the presence of phenolics.

    In summary, the supplementation of the light-grown hairy root cultures with a moderateconcentration of GA3 (0.025 M) resulted in increases in culture biomass, cell viability,secondary metabolite production, PAL activity, free radical activity, and root morphology,while lower and higher levels of GA3 supplementation resulted in a decrease in all parameterstested compared to the control. Therefore, the use of GA3 supplementation may function as aneffective method to optimize the production of secondary metabolites from E. purpurea hairyroot cultures; however, it is clear that the GA3 concentration is a critical factor.

    Acknowledgments This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no.21150110459), the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (nos. YZ-06-03 &Y227051304), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Fellowship for Young International Scientists (no.2011Y1GA01), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Visiting Professorship for Senior International Scientists (no.2011T1G05), and the Gosling Research Institute for Plant Preservation, Canada. Abbasi BH acknowledgesfinancial support of Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for providing financial assistance for PhD.

    References

    1. Hudson, J. B. (2010). Journal Medicine Plants Research, 4, 27462752.2. Liu, C. Z., Abbasi, B. H., Min, G., Murch, S. J., & Saxena, P. K. (2006). Journal Agriculturae Food

    Chemistry, 54, 84568460.

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 550

    25

    50

    75

    100

    cdcd

    bcb

    ee

    ded cd

    cd

    bc

    bbcbc

    dede

    cdcd

    bc

    b ab

    ef

    e

    ded

    cdc

    bab ab

    Control 0.005 0.025 1.0

    Radi

    cal s

    cave

    ngin

    g act

    ivity

    (%

    )

    Days

    a

    Fig. 7 Time course of radicalscavenging activity as deter-mined by the DPPH method in E.purpurea hairy root culturesgrown in MS media with orwithout GA3 supplementation for50 days. Values are means oftriplicate samplesthe standarddeviation. Means with differentletters are statistically differentfrom control at p0.05 accordingto Tukeys HSD test

    Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2012) 168:20572066 2065

  • 3. Abbasi, B. H., Liu, R., Saxena, P. K., & Liu, C. Z. (2009). Journal Chemistry Technical Biotechnology,84, 16971701.

    4. Lin, Z., Neamati, N., Zhao, H., Kiryu, Y., Turpin, J. A., Aberham, C., et al. (1999). Journal of MedicinalChemistry, 42, 14011414.

    5. Jones, M. P. A., Saxena, P. K., & Murch, S. J. (2009). Engineering Life Science, 9, 205210.6. Abbasi, B. H., Tian, C. L., Murch, S. J., Saxena, P. K., & Liu, C. Z. (2007). Plant Cell Reports, 26, 1367

    1372.7. Biondi, S., Lenzi, C., Baraldi, R., & Bagni, N. (1997). Journal Plant Growth Regional, 16, 159167.8. Bais, H. P., George, S. J., & Ravishankar, G. A. (2001). In Vitro Development Biology: Plant, 37, 293

    299.9. Sharaf-Eldin, M. A., Schnitzler, W. H., Nitz, G., Razin, A. M., & El-Oksh, I. I. (2007). Science

    Horticultural, 111, 326329.10. Smith, T. C., Weathers, P. J., & Cheetham, R. D. (1997). In Vitro Development Biology: Plant, 33, 7579.11. Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473497.12. Koukol, J., & Conn, E. E. (1961). Journal of Biological Chemistry, 236, 26922698.13. Steponkus, P. L., & Lanphear, F. O. (1967). Plant Physiology, 42, 14231426.14. Harborne, J. B. (1958). Biochemistry Journal, 70, 2228.15. Goering, H. K. and Soest, P. J. (1970). In: Agricultural handbook No. 379, Forage fiber analyses:

    apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications (pp. 2036). Washington: USDA16. Rieger, M., & Litvin, P. (1999). Journal of Experimental Botany, 50, 201209.17. Amarowicz, R., Pegg, R. B., Rahimi-Moghaddam, P., Barl, B., & Weil, J. A. (2004). Food Chemistry, 84,

    551562.18. Ritchie, S., McCubbin, A., Ambrose, G., Kao, T.-H., & Gilroy, S. (1999). Plant Physiology, 120, 361

    370.19. Ohkawa, H., Kamada, H., Suodo, H., & Harada, H. (1989). Journal of Plant Physiology, 134, 633636.20. Tuna, A. L., Kaya, C., Dikilitas, M., & Higgs, D. (2007). Environmental and Experimental

    Botany, 62, 19.21. Teszlak, P., Gaal, K., & Nikfardjam, M. S. P. (2005). Analytica Chimica Acta, 543, 275281.22. Baluska, R., Parker, J. S., & Barlow, P. A. (1993). Planta, 191, 149157.23. Khan, M. I. (1980). Biologia Plantarum, 22, 401403.24. Ilan, A., & Dougall, D. K. (1994). Journal Plant Growth Regulation, 13, 213219.25. Shirley, B. W. (2001). Plant Physiology, 126, 485493.26. Neves, G. Y. S., Marchiosi, R., Ferrarese, M. L. L., Siqueira, S., & Ferrarese-Filho, O. (2010). Journal of

    Agronomy and Crop Science, 196, 467473.27. Singh, K., Kumar, S., Rani, A., Gulati, A., & Ahuja, P. S. (2009). Functional Integration Genomics, 9,

    125134.28. Ohlsson, A. B., & Berglund, T. (2001). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 64, 7780.29. Gao, J., Zhang, S., Cai, F., Zheng, X., Lin, N., Qin, Y., et al. (2012). Molecular Biology Reports, 39,

    34433452.30. Li, X., Li, S., & Lin, J. X. (2003). Plant Science, 164, 549556.31. Boo, H. O., Chon, S. U., & Lee, S. Y. (2006). Journal Horticulture Science Technical, 81, 478482.32. Pellati, F., Benvenuti, S., Magro, L., Melegari, M., & Soragni, F. (2004). Journal of Pharmaceutical and

    Biomedical Analysis, 35, 289301.33. Tsai, Y. L., Chiou, S. Y., Chan, K. C., Sung, J. M., & Lin, S. D. (2012). LWT-Food Science Technical, 46,

    169176.34. Taveira, M., Pereira, D. M., Sousa, C., Ferreres, F., Andrade, P. B., Martins, A., et al. (2009). Journal

    Agriculture Food Chemistry, 57, 12471252.

    2066 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2012) 168:20572066

    Gibberellic Acid Increases Secondary Metabolite Production in Echinacea purpurea Hairy RootsAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsHairy Root Culture and GA3 TreatmentAnalytical MethodsStatistical Analyses

    Results and DiscussionEffects of GA3 on the Growth and Morphology of E. purpurea Hairy RootsEffects of GA3 on CADs Production

    References