26
1. Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations for the CLIC DB Injector

1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

1. Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran2. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani

Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations for the CLIC DB Injector

Page 2: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

Contents

1. Introduction

1.1. CLIC DB Injector Layout

1.1. Basic Beam Dynamics Studies (Emittance Growth)

2. DB Injector Thermionic gun

2.1. Thermionic Gun Design

2.2. Thermionic Gun Simulations

3. DB injector RF gun

3.1. RF Gun Design

3.2. RF Gun Simulations

3.3. Comparison

Page 3: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

Bunching System TW Accelerating Structures

1.1. CLIC DB Injector Layout (2 Options)

1. Introduction 1

DC Gun

12 TW Accelerating StructuresRF Gun

Page 4: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

1.2. Beam Dynamics Studies (Emittance Growth)

1. Introduction 2

Wangler’s formula:

Potential Energy differenceBetween the beam and its equivalent uniform beam

Gamma EnergyAny non-uniformity in the beam distribution will result in the emittance growth specially in nonrelativistic beams and beams with bigger RMS radiuses

RMS beamradius

Nonlinear fieldschange the beam uniformity and cause to emittance growth

𝜀𝑛=√ ⟨𝑥2 ⟩ ⟨𝛾𝛽 𝑥′2 ⟩ − ⟨ 𝑥𝛾𝛽𝑥 ′ ⟩2

Page 5: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

Wangler’s formula:

Strategies for designing a low emittance electron gun

1.2. Beam Dynamics Studies (Designing Strategies)

1. Introduction 3

1) Design the gun with as much as possible linear electromagnetic fields

2) Minimize the action of remaining nonlinearities with faster acceleration and smaller beam size

Page 6: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 4

2.1. Thermionic Gun Design (Potential Expansion)

If we can somehow find the potential function on symmetric axis z then we can easily find the electrostatic potential every where and so the electrode shapes

If we want to have a linear electrostatic field we should have a parabola shape for potential function on symmetric axis

𝑉 (𝑟 ,𝑧 )=(1+∑𝑛=1

∞ (−1 )𝑛 ( 𝑟2 )2𝑛

(𝑛 ! )2𝑑2𝑛

𝑑𝑧 2𝑛 )𝑉 (𝑧 )

𝐸𝑟 (𝑟 ,𝑧 )=𝑟2

×(1+∑𝑛=1

∞ (−1 )𝑛( 𝑟2 )2𝑛

𝑛 ! (𝑛+1 )!𝑑2𝑛

𝑑𝑧2𝑛  )𝑉 ′ ′ (𝑧 )

According to the Maxwell equations for axisymmetric electrostatic fields we can write:

Page 7: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

𝑉 ′ ′+ 2𝑅′

𝑅𝑉 ′=−

2𝑚𝑐2

𝑞𝛾 {4√𝛾2 −1𝜀𝑛2

𝑅4 + 𝑞𝐼

4𝜋 𝜖0𝑐𝑚𝑐2 𝑅2 √𝛾2 −1−𝑅′ ′

𝑅(𝛾 2− 1 )}

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 5

2.1. Thermionic Gun Design (Envelope Equation)

Envelope equation:

𝑅′ ′+(𝛾×𝛾′

𝛾 2− 1 )×𝑅 ′+( 𝛾×𝛾 ′ ′

2 (𝛾2 −1 ) )×𝑅= 𝑞𝐼

4𝜋 𝜖0𝑐𝑚𝑐2 (𝛾2 −1 )3 /2𝑅

+4 𝜀𝑛

2

𝑅3 (𝛾 2− 1 )

𝛾 (𝑧 )=1+𝑞

𝑚𝑐2 [𝑉 h𝑐𝑎𝑡 𝑜𝑑𝑒−  𝑉 (𝑧 ) ]+¿

Page 8: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 6

2.1. Thermionic Gun Design (Potential Equation)

𝑑=51.6𝑚𝑚

Very close to a parabola and so linear fields

𝑉 ′ ′+ 2𝑅′

𝑅𝑉 ′=−

2𝑚𝑐2

𝑞𝛾 {4√𝛾2 −1𝜀𝑛2

𝑅4 + 𝑞𝐼

4𝜋 𝜖0𝑐𝑚𝑐2 𝑅2 √𝛾2 −1−𝑅′ ′

𝑅(𝛾 2− 1 )}

𝑉 𝑐=140𝑘𝑉

Page 9: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 7

2.1. Thermionic Gun Design (Equipotential Surfaces)

0 kV Anode140kV Cathode

Page 10: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 8

2.1. Thermionic Gun Design (Cathode Shape)

A parabola could be a good approximation for the cathode shape

Page 11: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 9

2.1. Thermionic Gun Design (Anode Shape)

A nose could be a good approximation for the anode shape

Page 12: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

𝑉=− 140𝑘𝑉

𝑉=0𝑘𝑉

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 10

2.1. Thermionic Gun Design (DC Gun Geometry)

A

Page 13: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

h𝐶𝑎𝑡 𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑁𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑅𝑅𝑀𝑆=3.6𝑚𝑚

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 11

2.2. Thermionic Gun Simulations (Beam Envelope)

Page 14: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

h𝐶𝑎𝑡 𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑁𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 12

2.2. Thermionic Gun Simulations (Normalized Emittance)

Page 15: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

𝜀𝑛=5.8𝑚𝑚 ∙𝑚𝑟𝑎𝑑

2. DB Injector Thermionic Gun 13

2.2. Thermionic Gun Simulations (Solenoid Channel)

𝐵=774𝐺

Page 16: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 14

2.1. RF Gun Design (Specifications)

Page 17: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 15

2.1. RF Gun Designing (Designing &Optimization Algorithm)

Beam dynamics simulations in cavity fields with Parmela and calculate the beam parameters

at the end of cavity

Selection of a Working Phase for the cavity

Designing the cavity with this coupling factor and

calculate its electromagnetic fields with CST

Beam Loading calculations and find the optimum coupling factor and detuning with the goal of having

minimum input power

Change the working

phase of the cavity

Matching the beam to the

solenoid channel and simulate the beam in acc structures

Optimum Structure

Page 18: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 16

2.1. RF Gun Design (Beam Loading Optimization)

Page 19: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 17

2.1. RF Gun Design (RF Phase Optimization)

Page 20: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 18

2.1. RF Gun Design (Specifications of Optimum Structure)

Page 21: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 19

2.1. RF Gun Design (Cavity Fields)

Page 22: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 20

2.1. RF Gun Design (Focusing Channel)

Envelope Equation

12 Accelerating Structures

Page 23: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 21

2.2. RF Gun Simulations (Emittance & Envelope)

𝜖𝑛=5.26

𝑥𝑟𝑚𝑠=1.02

Page 24: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 22

2.3. RF Gun Simulations (Longitudinal Parameters )

RF

DC

Page 25: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

2. DB Injector RF Gun 23

2.3. Comparison

S

Page 26: 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations

Work in Progress

Thanks for Attention