25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA October 2001 Grand Jury UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RICHARD JAMES MORAN, ) GINA CHA MORAN, ) RONALD ADAIR PARRISH, ) RICHARD LEE CARLISLE, and ) JOSEPH KANG HUR, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) NO. SA CR ________________ I N D I C T M E N T [18 U.S.C. § 371: Conspiracy; 18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery; 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h): Money Laundering Conspiracy; 18 U.S.C. § 1957: Engaging in Monetary Transactions in Property Derived from Unlawful Activity; 41 U.S.C. § 423: Disclosure of Procurement Information; 18 U.S.C. § 1512: Obstruction of Justice; 18 U.S.C. § 2(a): Aiding and Abetting] The Grand Jury charges: INTRODUCTION At all times relevant to this indictment: 1. The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ("USA- CCK") had responsibility for solicitation, award and oversight of contracts entered by the United States Armed Forces in the Republic of Korea. /// /// /// JCH:jch

2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

  • Upload
    votruc

  • View
    218

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

October 2001 Grand Jury

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ))

Plaintiff, ))

v. ))

RICHARD JAMES MORAN, )GINA CHA MORAN, )RONALD ADAIR PARRISH, )RICHARD LEE CARLISLE, and )JOSEPH KANG HUR, )

))

Defendants. )))

)

NO. SA CR ________________

I N D I C T M E N T

[18 U.S.C. § 371: Conspiracy;18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery; 18U.S.C. § 1956(h): MoneyLaundering Conspiracy; 18U.S.C. § 1957: Engaging inMonetary Transactions inProperty Derived from UnlawfulActivity; 41 U.S.C. § 423:Disclosure of ProcurementInformation; 18 U.S.C. § 1512:Obstruction of Justice; 18 U.S.C. § 2(a): Aiding andAbetting]

The Grand Jury charges:

INTRODUCTION

At all times relevant to this indictment:

1. The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ("USA-

CCK") had responsibility for solicitation, award and oversight of

contracts entered by the United States Armed Forces in the Republic

of Korea.

///

///

///

JCH:jch

Page 2: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighth

United States Army and Commander of the USA-CCK. As Commander of

the USA-CCK, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN supervised a staff of

approximately 140 and was responsible for oversight, approval, and

execution of more than 17,000 contracts with an annual valuation of

more than $310 million.

3. As Commander of the USA-CCK, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

was bound to conduct government business in a manner above

reproach, and except as authorized by statute or regulation, with

complete impartiality and with preferential treatment for none.

4. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN’s specific responsibilities as

Commander of the USA-CCK included established objectives of

developing a genuine competitive contracting environment and saving

the United States Forces Korea in excess of $135 million from

estimated costs of procurement by end of Fiscal Year 2002.

5. Defendant GINA C. MORAN was married to defendant RICHARD

J. MORAN. Defendant GINA C. MORAN was not employed by the USA-CCK.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Page 3: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

COUNT ONE

[18 U.S.C. § 371]

A. BACKGROUND

Aulson and Sky Contracts

6. Aulson and Sky Construction Company, Ltd., ("A&S") was

based in the Republic of Korea. Unindicted co-conspirator Kyu Chun

Chong was President of A&S.

7. In or about March 2001, A&S submitted a bid for a

contract to improve military family housing at the Osan Air Base

in the Republic of Korea ("Military Family Housing Contract"). The

USA-CCK specified that the contract should be awarded to the lowest

priced, technically acceptable offer that satisfied the terms and

conditions of the solicitation. The government estimated the value

of the contract as approximately $1.9 million.

8. Of the 16 companies that submitted bids for the Military

Family Housing Contract, A&S was ranked 11th for its proposed

price, and later ranked second among those initially deemed

technically acceptable by the USA-CCK. After the USA-CCK conducted

a further assessment, the USA-CCK awarded the Military Family

Housing Contract to A&S.

9. In or about May 2001, A&S submitted a bid for a contract

to upgrade and renovate barracks at Camp Carroll in the Republic of

Korea ("Camp Carroll Contract"). The USA-CCK specified that the

contract should be awarded to the lowest priced, technically

acceptable offer that satisfied the terms and conditions of the

solicitation. The government estimated the value of the Camp

Page 4: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 4

Carroll Contract as approximately $6.5 million.

10. Of the 17 companies that submitted bids for the Camp

Carroll Contract, A&S was ranked 15th for its proposed price, and

later ranked second among those deemed technically acceptable by

the USA-CCK. After the USA-CCK conducted a further assessment, the

USA-CCK awarded the Camp Carroll Contract to A&S.

11. In or about August 2001, A&S submitted a bid for a

contract for a comprehensive barracks upgrade and renovation in the

Republic of Korea ("Area 1 Contract"). The USA-CCK specified that

the contract should be awarded to the lowest priced, technically

acceptable offer that satisfied the terms and conditions of the

solicitation. The government estimated the value of the Area 1

Contract as approximately $16.3 million.

12. Of the 10 companies that submitted bids for the Area 1

Contract, A&S was ranked ninth for its proposed price, and later

ranked third among those deemed technically acceptable by the USA-

CCK. After the USA-CCK conducted a further assessment, the USA-CCK

awarded the Area 1 Contract to A&S.

IBS Industries Company Contract

13. IBS Industries Company, Ltd., ("IBS") was a company based

in the Republic of Korea. Unindicted co-conspirator Woong-Seo Koo

was the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of IBS.

14. In or about September 2001, IBS submitted a bid for a

contract for uniformed civilian security guards throughout the

Republic of Korea ("Security Guard Contract"). IBS employed

defendant JOSEPH K. HUR as a consultant for purposes of obtaining

Page 5: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 5

the Security Guard Contract.

15. The USA-CCK specified that the contract should be awarded

to the offeror that provided best value to the government, and that

satisfied the terms and conditions of the solicitation. The

government estimated the value of the Security Guard Contract as

approximately $112 million.

16. Of the 11 companies that submitted bids for the Security

Guard Contract, IBS was ranked eighth for its proposed price, and

later ranked second among those deemed technically acceptable by

the USA-CCK. The USA-CCK then awarded a portion of the Security

Guard Contract to IBS.

B. OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY

17. Beginning in or about February 2001 and continuing to in

or about January 16, 2002, in the Republic of Korea, defendants

RICHARD J. MORAN, GINA C. MORAN, JOSEPH K. HUR and others known and

unknown to the grand jury willfully conspired and agreed with each

other to commit an offense against the United States, namely, to

solicit, offer, receive and agree to receive bribes in violation of

Title 18 United States Code, Section 201.

18. The plan and purpose of this conspiracy was for defendant

RICHARD J. MORAN to receive bribes from Korean companies either

personally or through defendants GINA C. MORAN and JOSEPH K. HUR in

exchange for his efforts to secure the award of United States

military contracts to those Korean companies.

Page 6: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 6

C. MEANS BY WHICH THE OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY WAS TO BE

ACCOMPLISHED

The objects of the conspiracy were to be accomplished in

substance as follows:

19. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN would agree to cause the USA-

CCK to award United States military contracts to Korean companies

in exchange for negotiated bribes.

20. Defendants GINA C. MORAN and JOSEPH K. HUR would specify

the form of bribery payment and would collect the bribery payments

on behalf of co-defendant RICHARD J. MORAN.

D. OVERT ACTS

21. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to accomplish the

object of the conspiracy, defendants RICHARD J. MORAN, GINA C.

MORAN and JOSEPH K. HUR committed various overt acts in the

Republic of Korea, including but not limited to the following:

a. In or about February 2001, in the Republic of Korea,

defendant RICHARD C. MORAN secured an agreement from A&S through an

unindicted co-conspirator to pay 150 million Korean Won in exchange

for the award of the Military Family Housing Contract.

b. In or about February 2001, in the Republic of Korea,

defendant RICHARD J. MORAN used an unindicted co-conspirator to

provide details of the confidential Independent Government Cost

Estimate to A&S to assist A&S in its bid for the Military Family

Housing Contract.

c. In or about May 2001, in the Republic of Korea, Kyu

Chun Chong of A&S paid 50 million Korean Won to an unindicted co-

Page 7: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 7

conspirator recruited by defendant RICHARD J. MORAN.

d. In or about May, 2001, in the Republic of Korea,

defendant GINA C. MORAN met with Kyu Chun Chong of A&S and agreed

to an additional payment of $50,000 in exchange for the award of

the Military Family Housing Contract to A&S.

e. In or about September 2001, in the Republic of

Korea, after the award of the Military Family Housing Contract to

A&S, defendant GINA C. MORAN instructed Kyu Chun Chong that the

$50,000 payment must be in the form of United States currency in

$100 denominations.

f. In or about September 2001, at the Yongsan Army base

in the Republic of Korea, defendant GINA C. MORAN collected from

Kyu Chun Chong $50,000 in $100 denominations in exchange for the

award of the Military Family Housing Contract to A&S.

g. In or about May 2001, prior to any bids being

submitted for the award of the Camp Carroll Contract, defendant

RICHARD J. MORAN took possession of the Camp Carroll Contract

files, which contained the confidential Independent Government Cost

Estimate.

h. In or about May 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

provided defendant GINA C. MORAN with details from the confidential

Independent Government Cost Estimate and a suggested bid amount for

the Camp Carroll Contract.

i. In or about May 2001, in a meeting at the Yongsan

Army base in the Republic of Korea, defendant GINA C. MORAN met

with Kyu Chun Chong and agreed to a payment of $200,000 in exchange

Page 8: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 8

for the award of the Camp Carroll Contract to A&S.

j. In or about May 2001, in a meeting at the Yongsan

Army base in the Republic of Korea, defendant GINA C. MORAN

provided Kyu Chun Chong with details from the confidential

Independent Government Cost Estimate and a suggested bid amount for

the Camp Carroll Contract.

k. In or about June 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

reviewed information regarding the two lowest bids received on the

Camp Carroll Contract, in which A&S was the second lowest bidder.

l. In or about June 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

advised Kyu Chun Chong of A&S that it was not the low bidder on the

Camp Carroll Contract, and that A&S would have to submit a Best and

Final Offer.

m. In or about July 2001, after the award of the Camp

Carroll Contract to A&S, defendant GINA C. MORAN instructed Kyu

Chun Chong that the $200,000 payment must be in the form of United

States currency in $100 bill denominations.

n. In or about July and August 2001, defendant GINA C.

MORAN collected installment payments from Kyu Chun Chong totaling

$200,000 in $100 denominations in exchange for the award of the

Camp Carroll Contract to A&S.

o. In or about August 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

provided defendant GINA C. MORAN with details from the confidential

Independent Government Cost Estimate for the Area I Contract.

p. In or about August 2001, in a meeting at the Yongsan

Army base, defendant GINA C. MORAN met with Kyu Chun Chong and

Page 9: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 9

agreed to a payment of $500,000 in exchange for the award of the

Area I Contract to A&S.

q. In or about August 2001, in a meeting at the Yongsan

Army base, defendant GINA C. MORAN provided Kyu Chun Chong with

details from the confidential Independent Government Cost Estimate

for the Area I Contract.

r. In or about August 2001, after all companies

interested in the award of the Area I Contract had submitted their

bids to the USA-CCK but before the award of the contract, defendant

RICHARD J. MORAN took possession of the price negotiation

memorandum, which reflected that the Area I Contract should be

awarded to a company other than A&S.

s. In or about August 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

directed his subordinate to collect the files for the Area I

Contract, including the bids submitted by all contractors, in order

to perform a different analysis of the cost and pricing data

submitted by the technically acceptable contractors.

t. In or about September 2001, defendant RICHARD J.

MORAN advised employees of the USA-CCK that the contractors who had

submitted bids lower than A&S were not appropriate for the award of

the contract, leaving A&S as the lowest priced, technically

acceptable contractor for the Area I Contract.

u. In or about November and December 2001, at the

Yongsan Army base, defendant GINA C. MORAN collected installment

payments from Kyu Chun Chong totaling $150,000 in $100

denominations in exchange for the award of the Area I Contract to

Page 10: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 10

A&S.

v. In or about August 2001, defendants RICHARD J. MORAN

and JOSEPH K. HUR met to discuss the award of the Security Guard

Contract.

w. In or about August 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

provided defendant JOSEPH K. HUR with the name of a company that

could bid on the Security Guard Contract, namely IBS.

x. In or about August 2001, defendant JOSEPH K. HUR met

with representatives of IBS to discuss a possible bid on the

Security Guard Contract.

y. Later in or about August 2001, defendants RICHARD J.

MORAN and JOSEPH K. HUR decided that HUR could serve as a

"consultant" to IBS to assist it in the award of the contract in

exchange for payment to MORAN and HUR.

z. In or about August 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

assured defendant JOSEPH K. HUR that MORAN would assist HUR in

securing the award of the Security Guard Contract for IBS.

aa. In or about August 2001, defendants RICHARD J. MORAN

and JOSEPH K. HUR reviewed and approved the terms of the

"consulting" agreement between IBS and HUR.

bb. In or about August 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

advised defendant JOSEPH K. HUR not to divulge his involvement with

HUR on the Security Guard Contract.

cc. In or about October 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

advised defendant JOSEPH K. HUR that IBS would receive a portion of

the Security Guard Contract.

Page 11: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 11

dd. In or about October 2001, after IBS received a

portion of the Security Guard Contract, Woong-Seo Koo of IBS

provided $20,000 in $100 denominations, along with Korean Won bank

checks, to defendant JOSEPH K. HUR.

ee. In or about October 2001, defendant JOSEPH K. HUR

provided defendant RICHARD J. MORAN with half of the money and bank

checks paid to HUR by IBS.

ff. In or about December 2001, defendant RICHARD J.

MORAN advised defendant JOSEPH K. HUR that more money should be

paid by IBS for the award of the Security Guard Contract.

gg. In or about December 2001, defendant JOSEPH K. HUR

contacted Woong-Seo Koo of IBS, and demanded an additional payment

for the award of the Security Guard Contract.

hh. In or about December 18, 2001, defendant JOSEPH K.

HUR received additional Korean Won bank checks from Woong-Seo Koo

of IBS.

ii. In or about December 2001, defendant JOSEPH K. HUR

provided defendant RICHARD J. MORAN with half of the bank checks

paid to HUR by IBS.

Page 12: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 12

COUNT TWO

[18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b), 2(a)]

22. Paragraphs 1 through 18 are re-alleged and incorporated

by reference as though set forth in full.

23. On or about May 2001, in the Republic of Korea, defendant

RICHARD J. MORAN, a Colonel in the United States Army and Commander

of the USA-CCK, corruptly sought, received and agreed to receive

approximately $50,000 in return for being influenced in the

performance of any official act, and being induced to do any act in

violation of his official duty, in conjunction with the award of

the Military Family Housing Contract by the USA-CCK.

At the above time and place, defendant GINA C. MORAN aided,

abetted, counseled, induced and procured the commission of the

offense alleged above.

Page 13: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 13

COUNT THREE

[18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b), 2(a)]

24. Paragraphs 1 through 18 are re-alleged and incorporated

by reference as though set forth in full.

25. In or about May 2001, in the Republic of Korea, defendant

RICHARD J. MORAN, a Colonel in the United States Army and Commander

of the USA-CCK, corruptly sought, received and agreed to receive

approximately $200,000 in return for being influenced in the

performance of any official act, and being induced to do any act in

violation of his official duty, in conjunction with the award of

the Camp Carroll Contract by the USA-CCK.

At the above time and place, defendant GINA C. MORAN aided,

abetted, counseled, induced and procured the commission of the

offense alleged above.

Page 14: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 14

COUNT FOUR

[18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b), 2(a)]

26. Paragraphs 1 through 18 are re-alleged and incorporated

by reference as though set forth in full.

27. In or about August 2001, in the Republic of Korea,

defendant RICHARD J. MORAN, a Colonel in the United States Army and

Commander of the USA-CCK, corruptly sought, received and agreed to

receive approximately $500,000 in return for being influenced in

the performance of any official act, and being induced to do any

act in violation of his official duty, in conjunction with the

award of the Area 1 Contract by the USA-CCK.

At the above time and place, defendant GINA C. MORAN aided,

abetted, counseled, induced and procured the commission of the

offense alleged above.

Page 15: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 15

COUNT FIVE

[18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b), 2(a)]

28. Paragraphs 1 through 18 are re-alleged and incorporated

by reference as though set forth in full.

29. In or about August 2001, in the Republic of Korea,

defendant RICHARD J. MORAN, a Colonel in the United States Army and

Commander of the USA-CCK, corruptly sought, received and agreed to

receive money in return for being influenced in the performance of

any official act, and being induced to do any act in violation of

his official duty, in conjunction with the award of the Security

Guard Contract by the USA-CCK.

At the above time and place, defendant JOSEPH K. HUR aided,

abetted, counseled, induced and procured the commission of the

offense alleged above.

Page 16: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 16

COUNT SIX

[18 U.S.C. § 1956(h)]

A. INTRODUCTION

30. Paragraphs 1 through 18 are re-alleged and incorporated

by reference as though set forth in full.

B. OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY

31. From in or about April 2001 and continuing to in or about

February 2002, in the Republic of Korea and elsewhere, defendants

RICHARD C. MORAN and GINA C. MORAN and others known and unknown to

the Grand Jury, knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed with

each other to conduct and aid and abet the conducting of financial

transactions affecting foreign and interstate commerce, which

involved the proceeds of bribery, knowing that the transactions

were designed in whole and in part to conceal and disguise the

nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds,

and knowing that the property involved in the financial transaction

represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, in

violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections

1956(a)(1)(B)(i) and 2(a).

B. MEANS BY WHICH THE OBJECTS OF THE CONSPIRACY WERE TO BE

ACCOMPLISHED

The objects of the conspiracy were to be accomplished in

substance as follows:

32. Defendant GINA C. MORAN would collect bribery payments on

behalf of defendant RICHARD C. MORAN.

33. Defendants RICHARD C. MORAN and GINA C. MORAN would delay

Page 17: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 17

deposit of the bribery proceeds into bank accounts by storing the

bribery proceeds at their residence.

34. Defendants RICHARD C. MORAN and GINA C. MORAN would then

transport the proceeds from the Republic of Korea to the United

States, purchase cashier’s checks and deposit cashier’s checks and

currency into different bank accounts in the United States.

C. OVERT ACTS

35. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to accomplish the

objects of the conspiracy, defendants RICHARD C. MORAN and GINA C.

MORAN committed various overt acts in the Republic of Korea and

elsewhere, including but not limited to the following:

a. In or about April 30, 2001, in the Republic of

Korea, defendants RICHARD C. MORAN and GINA C. MORAN collected

bribery proceeds of approximately $40,000 from an associate who had

received that money from Kyu Chun Chong of A&S.

b. On or about June 9, 2001, defendants RICHARD C.

MORAN and GINA C. MORAN transported $40,000 in cash bribery

proceeds from the Republic of Korea to the United States of

America.

c. On or about June 17, 2001, defendant RICHARD J.

MORAN deposited $11,000 in cash bribery proceeds into a joint

savings account at a Bank of America branch in Virginia.

d. On or about June 17, 2001, defendant RICHARD J.

MORAN deposited $5,000 in cash bribery proceeds into a joint

checking account at a Bank of America branch in Virginia.

e. On or about June 17, 2001, in Virginia, defendants

Page 18: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 18

RICHARD C. MORAN and GINA C. MORAN purchased Bank of America

cashier’s checks in the amounts of $20,000 and $4,000 with cash

bribery proceeds.

f. On or about June 18, 2001, in Virginia, defendants

RICHARD C. MORAN and GINA C. MORAN deposited the Bank of America

cashier’s checks totaling $24,000 into three separate Legg Mason

investment accounts.

Page 19: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 19

COUNTS SEVEN THROUGH EIGHT

[18 U.S.C. §§ 1957; 2(a)]

36. On or about the dates set forth below, in the Republic of

Korea, knowing that the funds involved in the transactions

represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity,

defendants RICHARD J. MORAN and GINA C. MORAN did knowingly and

willfully conduct, aid, abet, counsel, induce, procure and cause to

be conducted monetary transactions involving criminally derived

property of a value of greater than $10,000, property that was in

fact derived from bribery:

COUNT DATE AMOUNT TRANSACTION

7 1/31/02 $50,960.30 Wire transfer of funds froma Legg Mason account in Virginia to Korea Exchange Bank in the Republic of Korea

8 2/14/02 $16,500.00 Cash withdrawal from Community Bank in the Republic of Korea

Page 20: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2820

COUNT NINE

[18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3)]

A. INTRODUCTION

37. Between in or about May 2001 and December 2001, defendant

GINA C. MORAN obtained the proceeds of bribes, totaling

approximately $400,000 in cash, as alleged above in paragraphs 1

through 18, which are incorporated herein by reference.

38. Between in or about May 2001 and December 2001, defendant

GINA C. MORAN secreted the $400,000 in bribery proceeds, as well as

an additional approximate $300,000 in cash, in the living room sofa

in the residence of defendants RICHARD J. MORAN and GINA C. MORAN

on the Yongsan Army base in Seoul, in the Republic of Korea.

39. On or about January 16, 2002, criminal investigators from

the Army executed a search warrant at the residence of defendants

RICHARD J. MORAN and GINA C. MORAN on the Yongsan Army base in

Seoul, in the Republic of Korea.

B. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

40. On or about January 16, 2002, in the Republic of Korea,

defendant GINA C. MORAN did knowingly engage in misleading conduct

toward agents of the Army Criminal Investigative Division with the

intent to hinder, delay, and prevent the communication to a law

enforcement officer of information relating to the commission of

bribery; namely, by making repeated trips from the living room to

her bedroom for the stated reason of illness while moving

approximately $700,000 in United States currency from the living

room sofa to the bedroom after Army criminal investigators had

searched the bedroom.

Page 21: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2821

COUNT TEN

[18 U.S.C. § 371]

A. INTRODUCTION

41. As Commander of the USA-CCK, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

was responsible for oversight, approval, and execution of contracts

that included contract DAJB03-01-C-0274 for computer services at

the USA-CCK ("Computer Services Contract").

42. Defendant RONALD A. PARRISH was the Chief of the Contract

Support Division at the USA-CCK, and had access to the bids

received on the Computer Services Contract.

43. Defendant RICHARD L. CARLISLE, residing in the Republic

of Korea, submitted a bid on the Computer Services Contract under

the name of Carlisle Consulting Company.

B. OBJECTS OF THE CONSPIRACY

44. Beginning in or about July 2001 and continuing to on or

about September 25, 2001, in the Republic of Korea, defendants

RICHARD J. MORAN, RONALD A. PARRISH, RICHARD L. CARLISLE, and

others known and unknown to the grand jury willfully conspired and

agreed with each other to commit an offense against the United

States, namely, to disclose and obtain contractor bid or proposal

information prior to the award of the contract, in violation of

Title 41 United States Code, Section 423.

45. The plan and purpose of this conspiracy was for

defendants RICHARD J. MORAN and RONALD A. PARRISH to provide a

competitive advantage to defendant RICHARD L. CARLISLE by

disclosing to defendant RICHARD L. CARLISLE a competitor’s bid or

proposal information for the Computer Services Contract.

Page 22: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2822

C. MEANS BY WHICH THE OBJECTS OF THE CONSPIRACY WAS TO BE

ACCOMPLISHED

The objects of the conspiracy were to be accomplished in

substance as follows:

46. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN would solicit bid or proposal

information from a competing company seeking the Computer Services

Contract.

47. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN would direct defendant RONALD

A. PARRISH to disclose the bid or proposal information of the

competing company to defendant RICHARD L. CARLISLE.

48. Defendant RICHARD L. CARLISLE would receive the bid or

proposal information of the competing company and use it in the

preparation of his bid for the Computer Services Contract.

D. OVERT ACTS

49. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to accomplish the

object of the conspiracy, defendants RICHARD J. MORAN, RONALD A.

PARRISH and RICHARD L. CARLISLE committed various overt acts in the

Republic of Korea, including but not limited to the following:

a. In or about July 2001, in the Republic of Korea,

defendant RICHARD J. MORAN solicited American Management Systems,

Inc., the incumbent contractor, to bid on the next year's Computer

Services Contract.

b. In or about August 2001, defendant RICHARD J. MORAN

directed defendant RONALD A. PARRISH to disclose the bid and

proposal information received from American Management Systems,

Inc. to defendant RICHARD L. CARLISLE.

c. On or about August 21, 2001, defendant RONALD A.

Page 23: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2823

PARRISH sent an electronic message to defendant RICHARD L.

CARLISLE, to which defendant PARRISH attached the bid and proposal

information received from American Management Systems, Inc.

d. On or about August 21, 2001, defendant RICHARD L.

CARLISLE received the bid and proposal information of American

Management Systems, Inc.

e. On or about September 12, 2001, defendant RICHARD L.

CARLISLE submitted his bid for the Computer Services Contract.

Page 24: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2824

COUNT ELEVEN

[41 U.S.C. § 423(a); 18 U.S.C. § 2(a)]

A. INTRODUCTION

50. Paragraphs 41 through 48 of this Indictment are re-

alleged and incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.

B. PROCUREMENT INTEGRITY ACT VIOLATION

51. On or about August 21, 2001, in the Republic of Korea,

defendants RICHARD J. MORAN and RONALD A. PARRISH, officials of the

United States, assisting with the award of a Federal agency

procurement, aiding and abetting each other, knowingly disclosed

contractor bid or proposal information prior to the award of the

contract, namely, the bid and proposal information of American

Management Systems, Inc.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Page 25: 2. Defendant RICHARD J. MORAN was a Colonel in the Eighthnews.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/crim/usmoran702ind.pdf · The United States Army Contracting Command Korea ... 2. Defendant RICHARD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2825

52. At the above time and place, defendant RICHARD L.

CARLISLE aided, abetted, counseled, induced and procured the

commission of the offense alleged above.

A TRUE BILL

__________________________Foreperson

DEBRA W. YANGUnited States Attorney

JOHN S. GORDONAssistant United States AttorneyChief, Criminal Division

JOHN C. HUESTONAssistant United States AttorneyChief, Santa Ana Branch Office