Upload
rafe-carson
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2
Overview
1. Big picture consumer/retail themes
2. BSA 3Q Benchmarking
3. Industry Insights and Consolidation Impact
4. Amazon/eCommerce Changing the Game
3
Bigger Picture Retail ShiftsTop 5 Retail Changes Last 5 Years
1. Square footage growth no longer a material driver in most channels
2. Focus has shifted to loyalty and increasing share of wallet with existing customers
3. eCommerce shift is leading to secular decline in bricks & mortar traffic
4. Consumers seem to be more permanently price sensitive from the recession & financial crisis
5. Millennials are making it more difficult to predict or influence behavior
4
Sloppy/Choppy Retail Sales1-2% Blended Same-Store Sales Growth
2Q08
3Q08
4Q08
1Q09
2Q09
3Q09
4Q09
1Q10
2Q10
3Q10
4Q10
1Q11
2Q11
3Q11
4Q11
1Q12
2Q12
3Q12
4Q12
1Q13
2Q13
3Q13
4Q13
1Q14
2Q14
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
All Channel CompMass, Grocery, Drug, Dollar, Club
Source: Company Reports, CRC Estimates
5
Traffic Secularly Challenged?Most retailers fighting just to stay flat
1Q11
2Q11
3Q11
4Q11
1Q12
2Q12
3Q12
4Q12
1Q13
2Q13
3Q13
4Q13
1Q14
2Q14
-0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
All Channel TrafficMass, Grocery, Drug, Dollar, Club
Source: Company Reports, CRC Esti-mates
6
Leadership Changes at Retail• Over half of the top 13 retailers we closely follow
have changed CEOs in 2013/2014– Walmart, Target, Kroger, Safeway, Supervalu, PetSmart,
Home Depot (Nov-14)
• Target was the only company to make a deliberate move based on performance– Walmart results were below average with former CEO
• Kroger and Costco have had seamless leadership transitions (top 2 winners)
7
Key Emerging RetailThemes Last 60 Days
• Inventory levels are getting more in line after heavy 1H clearance/markdowns
• Promotional intensity also starting to lessen– Interesting to see higher food inflation getting passed
through with less-than-expected impact to volume recently
• Mass and online share winners in our work over back-to-school (BTS) timeframe
8
Key Emerging RetailThemes Last 60 Days
• The iPhone effect– One ~2,000 store chain (lower income demographic)
saw a 150-250bps negative impact starting the day of the iPhone launch.
– Increased adoption, better allocation of product, higher service plans
9
Most InterestingInsights & Inflections
• Missed seasonal sales in 1Q did not materially recover in 2Q (particularly department stores)
• Outlet mall traffic softer last 3-4 quarters, while “higher-end” off-price has performed well (Off 5th)
• Cabinet/faucet mix still favorable from high-end trade-up but also a decline in low-end sales this year
• Starbucks and Chipotle traffic trends both seem to be strengthening in 2Q despite additional menu pricing
• Seasonal sets appear to be showing up earlier for not only B2S but also holiday and winter programs
10
Back-To-School Insights
• B2S effectively in line but with winners and losers– Walmart appears to be leading (set 2-3 weeks earlier
this year)– Target and Dollar General also looking good– Office Superstores continue to be share donors– Drug Stores punted B2S (less assortment/inventory)– Department stores started well but had a mediocre
finish– Outlet mall traffic has been soft
• Activewear and athletic footwear best performers– Core denim still challenged
11
Initial Holiday Preview• Consumer Electronics remains a bright spot for
the holidays with new product launches including 4K TV and Apple product refreshes– Highly anticipated new products may cause weakness in
CE sales leading up to the holidays due to delayed purchases
– Some concern that CE sales during the holidays could cannibalize spend in other categories
• Costco and Walmart seem to be positioning to be the most aggressive with inventory and pricing this year– Fairly similar to last year
• Inventory in cold weather categories is looking more conservative due to favorable winter sales last year
12
Overview of Consumer HeadwindsLong list of negative cash flow items
• Key Issues in 2014– Weather put a big dent in 1Q consumer (and business) spend– Heating/utility bills higher due to extreme cold weather– Car repair/maintenance costs higher also due to weather– SNAP reductions most tangible headwind– Food/fuel inflation now rising
• Key Issues in 2014/beyond– Healthcare costs rising for both insured and uninsured– Big ticket purchases soaking up everyday spending power– Cost of owning/renting a home going up– Structural shift to eCommerce leading to secular traffic dip
13
Consumer Headwind MathConsumer Headwind Estimates
Annual Impact ($B) Annual Per Person Monthly Per PersonHealthcare Costs $94.5 $300 $25.00Auto (new) $60.0 $190 $15.87SNAP* $7.0 $149 $12.41Heating Bills $31.5 $100 $8.33eCommerce Shift $30.0 $95 $7.94Home Improvement $15.0 $48 $3.97Auto (repairs/maintenance) $10.0 $32 $2.65Appliances $4.0 $13 $1.06
$252.0 $927 $77.23
*SNAP only impacts 15% of AmericansSource: CRC estimates
14
Consumer Performance Index Strengthening Last Few
Months
Source: CRC
January February March April May June July August September-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
24%
9%
-9%
22%
9%
28%
18%
22%
40%
CRC Consumer Positive/Negative Index
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%8%
5%
3% 3%
0%
-1% -1%
-3%
-8%
-16%
Net Category Spend Plans for Next 12 Months[Plans for Spending More Minus Plans for Spending Less]
Source: CRC Consumer SurveyBase: 1033
Consumer Spending IntentionsFavors Home/Housing and Travel
1515
16
US Birth Rates ImprovingHigh correlation to consumer confidence
1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
-1.3% -1.1%
0.6%
-2.4%
-0.5%
-1.5%
-1.1%
1.8%
-0.6%-0.3%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2.8%
0.9%
Cleveland Research Proprietary Birth Index
Source: CRC
17
BSA – 3Q BENCHMARKING
18
Breakdown of Participants
Wholesale/Retail - 15%Man Reps - 46%Suppliers - 42%
Source: CRC/BSA Benchmarking
19
YTD Trends Above ExpectationsWeighted Avg. ~4% better than plan
10%+ BETTER than expected
5-10% BETTER than expected
0-5% BETTER than expected
0-5% WORSE than expected
5-10% WORSE than expected
10%+ WORSE than expected
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
7.7%
42.3%
30.8%
11.5%7.7%
0.0%
YTD Sales Trends vs. Plan
20
Optimism Around Initial 2015 plans
Up 6% Up 0-5% Down 0-5% Down 6%+0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
2015 Budgets
21
Solid 3Q ResultsWeighted Average up ~4%
10%+ BETTER 5-10% BETTER 0-5% BETTER 0-5% WORSE 5-10% WORSE 10%+ WORSE0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
3Q Sales (year-over-year)
22
Modest Acceleration from 2Q
10%+ BETTER 5-10% BETTER 0-5% BETTER 0-5% WORSE 5-10% WORSE 10%+ WORSE than 2Q
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
Sales trends (y/y) 3Q vs. 2Q
23
Inflation likely less of a worry than prior years
Less of an issue than prior years
Consistent with prior years
More of an issue than prior years
A significant problem0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
Inflation Concerns Muted
24
Government BusinessModest tailwind against easier compares
Still negative 1-4% better 5-10% better 10%+ better than overall trend
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
Sales to the Government/Public Sector
25
eCommerce ‘Growth Gap’ Widening
More significant than LY Similar to the spread LY Less significant than LY0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Growth: eCommerce vs. traditional
26
eCommerce GrowthWeighted Average up ~10% y/y
Flat or down slightly year-over-year
Up 0-10% year-over-year Up 10-20% year-over-year Up 20%+ year-over-year0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
eCommerce Growth (y/y)
27
INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
28
Office Products Industry Last 60 days
• Retail Business – Bad to Worse
• Delivery/Contract Segment Much More Encouraging
• Share Gains in the Independent Segment
• Elevated roadblocks with Depot/Max integration
29
Retail: What’s wrong now?
Staples• Re-flow stores not getting same traction that
segment has seen in delivery
• Price match (plus 10% back) more margin dilutive than traffic accretive
• Is leaner headcount impacting decision making?
30
Retail: What’s wrong now?
Staples• Re-flow stores not getting same traction that
segment has seen in delivery
• Price match (plus 10% back) more margin dilutive than traffic accretive
• Is leaner headcount impacting decision making?
31
Delivery/Contract More Stable
• Easy comparisons (prior year) from Public Sector has been a tailwind
• Growth from jan/san, breakroom, etc. still a significant positive.
• Furniture an added driver – more large projects moving through.
32
Strength from IndependentsWhat’s the Driver?
Largely competitive share gains• Staples– Significant employee turnover– Changes in field sales compensation
(defection)
• Office Depot/Max– Their accounts getting a lot of attention– Signs of integration issues popping up
33
Integration/Consolidation Feedback
• Early commentary was positive, now fading– Integration of systems not going
smoothly– Office Max segment seems ‘on auto-
pilot’– Increased forecasting issues, missed
customer shipments, less inventory visibility, issues with product codes
34
B&M VS. ECOMMERCE
35
$40 Billion of Retail SalesMoved Online in 2014
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014E0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
0.9%1.1%
1.4%1.8%
2.1%2.5%
3.0%
3.4%3.6%
4.0%4.4%
4.7%
5.2%
5.8%
6.5%
eCommerce Share of US Retail Sales
Source: U.S. Census
36
eCommerce OutperformanceGap Widening vs. B&M Retail
4Q09
1Q10
2Q10
3Q10
4Q10
1Q11
2Q11
3Q11
4Q11
1Q12
2Q12
3Q12
4Q12
1Q13
2Q13
3Q13
4Q13
1Q14
2Q14
3Q14
E
4Q14
E0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
eCommerce Growth vs. Total Retail
eCommerce Growth Total Retail GrowthSource: U.S. Census
37
Walmart Share Slipping2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014E
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
4.1%4.5%
5.0%5.3%
5.5% 5.7% 5.8% 6.0%
6.5%
7.1%6.8%
6.4% 6.3% 6.2% 6.1%
Walmart Share of Total U.S. Retail
Source: CRC estimates
38
Long-Term eCommerce Impact
• eCommerce/mobile growth forcing businesses to rethink existing distribution infrastructure and multi-channel fulfillment strategies
• Speed of distribution and fulfillment capacity increasingly critical– Industry standard moving from 2-day shipping to next-day
and eventually to same-day delivery (led by Amazon)
• Change in distribution requirements will likely spur incremental supply chain investments for businesses across multiple industries– Likely leads to physical build-out of new fulfillment centers
and supporting infrastructure
39
2014 .COM BENCHMARK
40
Key Conclusions
• eCommerce mix up 1 point vs. LY (from 6% to 7%)• 3-year target expected to move 10 points higher (17%)• Long-term ceiling potential now 25% (vs. 21% LY)• Total 2014 eCommerce growth = +28% (6 categories)• Total 2014 Amazon growth = +51% (6 categories)• Amazon Net Sales vs. Plan = +22% above plan• Amazon current eCommerce share = 32%• Digital Marketing = 17% of spend today vs. 8% in 2011
– Moving 10 points higher to 27% over next 3 years (CPG 40%)
41
Key Channel Conclusions
• Auto, Home Improvement best growth rates– Home Improvement growing +40% again in 2014– Auto growing 40% vs. 35% LY
• Discretionary category mix moving up quickly– 16% vs. 9% LY, ceiling now seen at 34% vs. 28% LY
• Office most mature category but highest ceiling– 20% mix today (vs. 15% LY) with 50% potential
• Food & Consumables growth slightly less robust– 20% overall growth (50% Amazon), 30% expected next 5 years– CPG investing the most: 80% allocating more resources, digital media
spend doubling from 20% of total to 40%
42
Average Online GrowthCore 6 categories +28% vs. 18% industry-wide
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
2013 2014E 2015E25%
26%
27%
28%
29%
26.6%
27.8%
28.5%
Total eCommerce Sales GrowthAll Categories
43
Average Online GrowthAuto/Home Improvement +40%
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Auto
Build
ing
Prod
ucts
Discre
tiona
ry
Office
Food
& C
onsu
mab
les
Consu
mer
Ele
ctro
nics
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%55%
43%
26%
20% 19%16%
2014 eCommerce GrowthRanked by Category
44
eCommerce Penetration7% today to 17% in 3 years to 25% LT
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Today In 3 Years Long Term0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
7%
17%
25%
eCommerce as % of Total SalesAll Categories
45
2014 eCommerce MixBy Category
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Office Discretionary Consumer Electronics Auto Building Product Food & Consumables0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
20%
16%
12%
7%4% 2%
33%
25% 26%
18%16%
7%
50%
34%
43%
25%
18% 17%
eCommerce as % of Total Sales
Today In 3 Years Long Term
46
eCommerce Mix by CategoryTODAY
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Office Discretionary Consumer Electronics Auto Building Products Food & Consumables0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
20%
16%
12%
7%
4%2%
Current eCommerce as % of Total SalesBy Category
47
eCommerce Mix by CategoryIN 3 YEARS
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Office Consumer Electronics Discretionary Auto Building Products Food & Consumables0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%33%
26%25%
18%16%
7%
2017E eCommerce as % of Total SalesBy Category
48
eCommerce Mix by CategoryLONG-TERM POTENTIAL
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Office Consumer Electronics Discretionary Auto Building Products Food & Consumables0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
50%
43%
34%
25%
18% 17%
Long-Term eCommerce Potential as % of Total Sales
By Category
49
AMAZON
50
Amazon Gaining Scale/MuscleFull 100 bps share gain since 2007 (~$50b)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014E
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2%0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
Amazon Share of Total U.S. Retail
Source: CRC estimates
51
Amazon Demanding Attention
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
3%
4%5%
6%
7%
9%
10%
11%
13%
14%
16%
Amazon Share of Top 10 Retail
52
Amazon Growth ContributionAdding a Full Point to Total Sales
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
Amazon Contribution to Total Sales Growth Among Top 10
53
2014 Amazon GrowthCore 6 categories +50% vs. 25% Total Amazon NA
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Office Building Products Food & Consumables Auto Discretionary Consumer Electronics0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
58% 57% 56%
51%
35%
23%
2014 Amazon GrowthRanked by Category
54
2014 Amazon Sales vs. PlanNet 22% above plan across all categories
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Office
Auto
Consu
mer
Ele
ctro
nics
Food
& C
onsu
mab
les
Build
ing
Prod
ucts
Discre
tiona
ry0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%45%
32%29%
25%
18%
11%
Amazon Net Sales vs. PlanPercentage of Companies Above Plan Minus Below
Plan
55
Amazon eCommerce Share
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Consu
mer
Ele
ctro
nics
Food
& C
onsu
mab
les
Build
ing
Prod
ucts
Discre
tiona
ry
Office
Auto
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
48%
39%
30% 29% 28%
19%
Amazon Share of eCommerceRanked by Category
56
Key Amazon Growth Vehicles
• Amazon Media Group (AMG) is a more significant growth driver going forward for both Amazon and suppliers– Great returns but also material profit engine
• Prime Pantry and AmazonFresh can change the game for replenishment and lower ticket items (early success for both very positive, especially Pantry)– Also more profitable formula to take share in
large categories
57
Amazon Supplier SurveyAverage Investment Levels/Growth
• “All-in” average trade funding = 10.5%– Largest suppliers nearly 13%
• 2014 trade spend up 1.7 points from 2013– 2013 also increased 1.5 points vs. 2012
• Average Amazon Media Group spend = $330k– Translates into average 2-3% of Amazon
sales– More companies reaching into 5-10% range
58
Source: CRC Amazon Survey
7% or under 7-10% 10-13% 13-16% 16%+0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%32%
20%
12%
18% 19%
What is your total “all-in” trade funding at Amazon this year (co-op +freight + damages, etc)?
Wide Range for Supplier FundingWeighted Average = 10.5%
59
Source: CRC Amazon Survey
None 0-2% higher 2-4% higher 4-6% higher 6%+ higher0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
26%
42%
24%
4% 4%
How much incremental funding does this represent vs. 2013?
Supplier Funding Up SignificantlyWeighted Average = 1.7 point increase vs. LY
60
DIGITAL MEDIA
61
Digital Marketing Spend
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
3 Years Ago Today 3 Years0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
8%
17%
27%
Digital MarketingAll Categories
62
Digital MarketingBy Category
Source: CRC 2014 eCommerce Benchmarking Study
Office Food & Consumables Auto Building Products Consumer Electronics0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
11%12%
10%
6% 6%
27%
21%
17%
14% 13%
47%
39%
22%20%
16%
Digital Marketing
3 Years Ago Today 3 Years
63
Digital Media Insights
• Facebook/Twitter investing heavily to provide better ROI visibility– Should accelerate digital adoption curve– Many companies still don’t invest in digital due to
lack of knowledge or ROI/data visibility• Most significant growth driven by mobile– Facebook mobile ads up 150% in 2Q (+$1b)
• Video ads now accelerating (FB autoplay) and expected to pull spend away from TV
64
Where Do I Invest?
• Mobile – better/easier consumer access• Digital/Social – stronger ROI• Assortment/content – drives conversion• Talent/Infrastructure – speed/agility key• Millennials – connect with next generation• Winners – focus on growth not size
65
APPENDIXOther Disclosures: We, Jason Whitmer, Eamon Kelly and Chris Hodson certify that the views expressed in the research report(s) accurately reflect my personal views about the subject security(s). Further I certify that no part of my compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views contained in the research report(s). The analysts responsible for the preparation of this report have no ownership stake in this company. Cleveland Research Company provides no investment banking services of any type on this or any company. Proprietary research and Information contained herein which forms the basis for findings or opinions expressed by Cleveland Research Company may be used by Cleveland Research for other purposes in the course of compensated consulting and other services rendered to third parties.The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.Member FINRA/SIPC
66
Antitrust DisclosurePlease remember the antitrust laws apply to CRC and all of our activities. CRC has an antitrust policy and expects all participants in this meeting to adhere to that policy and the antitrust laws. Compliance with letter and spirit of state and federal antitrust laws is an important goal of CRC and essential to maintaining its reputation for the highest standards of ethical conduct. Please do not discuss your company’s pricing information, including discounts, credit terms, or specific terms of sale. Please do not discuss your company’s specific customer or marketing information, sales territories, or similar information, and do not discuss allocating or sharing customers, or refusing to do business with particular customers or other companies. What a company does individually is its own business. If during the course of your attendance at this meeting, you find yourself in any conversation with someone about these subjects, please stop the conversation, or if necessary leave the conversation and let one of the CRC staff members know. If you have questions about what is permitted or not permitted, please ask a CRC staff member for assistance.