2000 Water Quality Report Table C-1 Total Estuarine and ... · Assessed estuarine sq. mi. from percent method (page 3.3-4) for estuaries and page 3.3-2 for shore miles. Remove this

2000 Water Quality Report Table C-1 Total Estuarine and Ocean Shoreline Waters in the Nation

Total Sq. MilesAssessed Sq. Miles

Percent Assessed

Total Miles

Assessed Miles

Percent Assessed

Alabama 610 541 88.6% 337 0.0%Alaska 33,204 28 0.1% 36,000 25 0.1%American Samoa 184 0 0.0% 116 53 45.7%California 2,139 2,033 95.0% 1,609 997 62.0%Connecticut 612 611 99.8% 380 0.0%Delaware 449 30 6.6% 25 25 100.0%Delaware River 866 866 100.0%District of Columbia 6 6 97.2%Florida 4,437 4,038 91.0% 8,460 0 0.0%Georgia 854 854 100.0% 100 0.0%Guam 1 0 0.0% 117 17 14.8%Hawaii 55 54 99.3% 1,052 871 82.8%Louisiana 7,656 4,036 52.7% 397 0 0.0%Maine 2,852 2,783 97.6% 5,296 0.0%Maryland 2,522 2,478 98.3% 32 32 100.0%Massachusetts 223 128 57.2% 1,519 0.0%Mississippi 760 613 80.6% 245 94 38.4%N Mariana Islands 15,989 1 0.0% 52 0 0.0%New Hampshire 21 21 100.0% 18 18 100.0%New Jersey 725 614 84.7% 127 127 100.0%New York 1,530 401 26.2% 120 3 2.5%North Carolina 3,121 3,121 100.0% 320 0.0%Oregon 206 54 26.1% 362 0.0%Puerto Rico 550 550 100.0%Rhode Island 151 151 100.0% 79 79 100.0%South Carolina 401 221 55.1% 190 0.0%Texas 2,394 1,993 83.3% 624 0.0%Virgin Islands 3 0.0% 209 209 100.0%Virginia 2,494 2,494 100.0% 120 120 100.0%Washington 2,904 2,904 100.0% 163 0 0.0%

Total 87,369 31,072 35.6% 58,618 3,221 5.5%

Jurisdiction

Estuaries Ocean Shoreline Waters

Table C-1 Total Estuarine and Ocean Shoreline Waters in the Nation

AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareDelaware RiverDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiN Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington

Total

Jurisdiction CommentPage 4. Assessed estuary square miles page 104.612 square miles of estuaries and 380 miles of coastline were obtained from the state's water resources atlasIncludes area inside fringing coral reefp. 13.

State revised atlas value because it had previously included Delaware Bay miles in New Jersey.Data from ADB. Separate values reported for estuaries and bays (in acres, converted to square miles) were summed. Value for shore miles from 1986 report (page 2).

Includes 25 square miles of freshwater estuary.Cannot be determined because it includes near coastal ocean waters

State reports assessment based on 269 square miles of estuaries and all 446 square miles of ocean waters in NJ jurisdiction (page II-7).State reports more accurate estimate of total estuarine square miles based on computer-generated 1:24,000 scale mapping.

State includes coastal shoreline waters in assessment of estuarine waters.Entered 1998 values for total estuarine square miles and shore miles; for assessed miles, entered values for aquatic life use from ADB.includes bays, estuarine areas, and lagoonsState reports 32 miles of shoreline include in 96 square miles of ocean waters.

More accurate estimate of total estuarine area based on GIS coverage of NWI maps.Assessed estuarine sq. mi. from percent method (page 3.3-4) for estuaries and page 3.3-2 for shore miles.Remove this record from database.Puerto Rico assessed estuarine use support in linear miles rather than square miles.Entered total waters from 1998 report because State did not include an estimate.Entered data from ADBTexas assessed coastal waters in square miles (3879) rather than coastal miles. Total shore miles from 1998 report because State did not include this information.1998 report was incorrect, VI has very little area of estuaries

Entered total estuarine sq. mi. from 1998 report in lieu of atlas value.(3 sq. mi.) on page 9. Total shore miles from page 75 in lieu of atlas value on page 9. Assessed estuarine sq. mi. included in shore miles.

Table C-2 Summary of Fully Supporting, Threatened, and Impaired Waters in Assessed Estuaries

JurisdictionFull Support - Evaluated

Full Support - Monitored

Full Support - Not Specified

Full Support - Total

Threatened - Evaluated

Threatened - Monitored

Not Specified

Threatened - Total

Impaired - Evaluated

Impaired - Monitored

Alabama 0 0 541Alaska 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 25American Samoa 0 0California 18 16 35 1 0 1 22 1,975Connecticut 139 139 14 14Delaware 0 0Delaware River 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 866District of Columbia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6Florida 2,390 665 0 3,055 42 79 0 121 270 591Georgia 499 10 509 0 177 172Guam 0 0 0 11Hawaii 0 23 23 0 0 0 1 30Louisiana 0 318 318 7 0 7 816 2,895Maine 2,173 300 2,473 0 0 310Maryland 0 918 918 0 0 1,560Massachusetts 46 0 46 0 0 0 81 0Mississippi 0 0 62 62N. Mariana Islands 0 0 0 0New Hampshire 0 0 0 0 7 14New Jersey 0 0 456 456 0 0 0 0 0 0New York 0 11 11 391North Carolina 3,006 3,006 0Oregon 0 8 8 11 11 0 35Puerto Rico 0 0Rhode Island 1 103 103 0 0 0 1 47South Carolina 136 136 0Texas 0 1,236 1,236 0 0 0 0 758Virgin Islands 0 0Virginia 773 773 796 796 422Washington 611 611 0 2,293

TOTAL 5,741 4,371 3,738 13,850 60 886 76 1,023 4,060 10,256Percent of assessed for summary of use support 18.8% 14.3% 12.2% 45.3% 0.2% 2.9% 0.2% 3.3% 13.3% 33.6%


JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareDelaware RiverDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiN. Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington

TOTALPercent of assessed for summary of use support

Impaired - Not Specified

Impaired - Total

Not Attainable - Evaluated

Not Attainable - Monitored

Not Attainable - Not Specified

Not Attainable - Total Total Evaluated Total Monitored

541 0 0 54125 0 2 26

0 0 0 01,997 0 41 1,992

458 458 0 0 00 0 0 0

866 0 0 8666 0 0 6

0 861 0 2,702 1,335349 0 676 182

11 0 0 1131 0 1 53

3,711 0 823 3,213310 0 2,173 610

1,560 0 0 2,47882 0 128 0

551 551 0 0 01 0 0 0

21 0 7 14158 158 0 0 0

391 0 402 0109 109 0 0 0

35 0 0 540 0 0 0

47 0 2 14985 85 0 0 0

758 0 0 1,9930 0 0 0

422 0 0 1,9912,293 0 2,904 0

1,360 15,676 0 0 0 0 9,861 15,513

4.5% 51.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 32.3% 50.8%




Total Unspecified Total Assessed

0 5410 280 00 2,033

611 6110 00 8660 60 4,0370 8580 110 540 4,0360 2,7830 2,4780 128

613 6130 10 21

614 6140 402

3,115 3,1150 540 00 151

221 2210 1,9930 00 1,9910 2,904

5,174 30,548

16.9%




Comment

Data from ADB. Separate values for estuaries and bays (acres, converted to square miles) reported by State were summed

State reported overall use support.No data. State reports 0.59 evaluated square miles of estuaries and 28.95 monitored. 25 miles of shore line were monitored.

Entered data from ADBExcludes effect of statewide advisory for dioxin in lobster tomalley.

Includes shoreline waters. Excludes separate shellfishing assessment for 2728 square miles of estuaries.Entered Statewide projections from ADB for aquatic life support.

Entered shellfishing use support use based on assessment of 614 square miles.Report states that all assessments should be considered as evaluated values (page 54). Value for fully supporting square miles includes unassessed square miles.p. 13. Converted data from acres.Page 104. Blanks listed as no data availablePuerto Rico reported linear miles of estuarine use support rather than square miles. Of the 175.4 miles assessed, 10.9 miles support all uses, 17.7 miles are threatened for one or more uses, and 146.8 miles are impaired for one or more uses.

Entered data from ADB.Included in coastal shoreline assessment.Entered data from March 2001 revisions (section 1.1-3)Values from the sample survey approach used for the assessment are considered to be evaluated data.

May be less than total assessed, because not all states report on summary of use support for all waters

Table C-3a Aquatic Life Use Support in Assessed Estuaries

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0Alaska 0California 34.9 0.9 1,738.6 249.9 2,024.3Connecticut 366.4 0.0 235.0 9.5 0.0 610.9Delaware 0.0 0.0 25.0 4.0 0.0 29.0Delaware River 198.0 152.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 385.0District of Columbia 5.3 0.0 0.6 0.0 5.9Florida 1,652.0 10.0 538.0 68.0 2,268.0Georgia 0.0Guam 0.3 10.5 10.8Hawaii 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.0Louisiana 334.0 0.0 2,409.5 1,217.0 0.0 3,960.5Maine 2,851.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 2,851.6Maryland 921.3 1,469.3 87.6 2,478.2Massachusetts 13.8 0.3 1.2 11.6 27.0Mississippi 0.0 62.2 550.5 0.0 0.0 612.7New Hampshire 21.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 21.2New Jersey 203.0 0.0 61.0 0.0 264.0New York 0.0 14.2 0.4 14.6North Carolina 0.0Oregon 0.0Puerto Rico 0.0Rhode Island 108.9 0.0 5.5 34.9 149.3South Carolina 144.9 22.7 53.5 221.1Texas 1,021.0 0.0 194.9 16.1 0.0 1,232.0Virgin Islands 0.0Virginia 792.1 806.7 257.4 82.3 1,938.4Washington 917.0 662.3 1,324.6 2,903.9

Total 9,624 1,032 8,186 3,205 0 22,047Percent of assessed for use 43.7% 4.7% 37.1% 14.5% 0.0%

Table C-3a Aquatic Life Use Support in Assessed Estuaries

JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareDelaware RiverDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington

TotalPercent of assessed for use

CommentNo data.No data.

page 28

No data

Entered data from ADB for fish and wildlife propagation use support.Includes propagation of fish and shellfish.Used numbers from electronic submission because did not receive clarification from state.Includes shoreline waters.Entered Statewide projections from ADB.

Assessment based on 264 square miles. State reports portions of waters may be duplicated by DRBC and ISC 305(b) reports."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Page 105. Blank categories listed as not applicable or no data available.Puerto Rico reported linear miles of estuarine use support rather than square miles.

Entered data from ADB.Included in coastal shoreline assessment.Entered only monitored data from NAD

Table C-3b Fish Consumption Use Support in Assessed Estuaries

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0Alaska 0California 35 19 1,729 245 2,027Connecticut 503 0 9 0 0 512Delaware 0Delaware River 0 0 803 63 0 866District of Columbia 0 0 0 6 6Florida 88 0 261 18 367Georgia 0Hawaii 33 0 0 6 0 39Louisiana 0Maine 0 0 2,852 0 0 2,852Maryland 2,452 71 0 2,522Massachusetts 0 0 0 10 10Mississippi 2 603 0 0 0 605New Hampshire 0 21 0 0 21New Jersey 0New York 0 110 6 116North Carolina 0Oregon 0Puerto Rico 0Rhode Island 0South Carolina 0Texas 961 0 0 48 0 1,008Virgin Islands 0Virginia 1,958 31 0 0 1,989Washington 0

Total 6,032 653 5,855 400 0 12,940Percent of assessed for use 46.6% 5.0% 45.3% 3.1% 0.0%

Table C-3b Fish Consumption Use Support in Assessed Estuaries

JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareDelaware RiverDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington



The above fish consumption data is for mercury. All estuaries (610.9 square miles) are listed as partially supporting the use due to PCB contamination. Page 28.No data.

No data

No data.Based on statewide fish/shellfish comsumption advisory.Used numbers from electronic submission because did not receive clarification from state.Includes shoreline waters.Entered Statewide projections from ADB.

No data. Estuary advisories reported by DRBC and ISC."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Page 105. Blank categories listed as no data available.No data.No data.No data.Entered data from ADB.Included in coastal shoreline assessment.Entered only monitored data from NADNo data.

Table C-3c Shellfishing Use Support in Assessed Estuaries

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0Alaska 0California 43 19 466 231 758Connecticut 273 0 14 324 0 611Delaware 1 0 14 0 0 15Delaware River 579 0 38 62 0 679District of Columbia 0Florida 1,398 111 256 0 1,765Georgia 0Hawaii 33 0 0 6 0 39Louisiana 1,078 0 0 75 0 1,153Maine 2,542 0 49 261 0 2,852Maryland 1,672 58 108 1,839Massachusetts 2,254 48 224 2,526Mississippi 550 2 26 0 0 579New Hampshire 0 8 13 0 21New Jersey 456 0 115 43 614New York 0 6 157 163North Carolina 0Oregon 4 0 68 0 0 72Puerto Rico 0 0 0 0 0 0Rhode Island 96 0 22 10 128South Carolina 613 159 119 891Texas 1,037 0 160 427 0 1,625Virgin Islands 0Virginia 1,642 2 68 24 1,735Washington 1,274 764 866 2,904

total 15,545 134 2,339 2,949 0 20,967

Percent of assessed for use 75.7% 0.6% 10.5% 13.2% 0.0%74.1% 0.6% 11.2% 14.1% 0.0%

Table C-3c Shellfishing Use Support in Assessed Estuaries


total

Percent of assessed for use


Page 28

No data.

No data

Entered data from ADBExcludes effect of statewide advisory for dioxin in lobster tomalley from estuarine waters.Used numbers from electronic submission because did not receive clarification from state.Data from separate shellfishing assessment in Table 5.4 (acres converted to square miles).Entered Statewide projections from ADB.

Assessment based on 614 square miles."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Page 105.


Table C-3d Swimming Use Support in Assessed Estuaries

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0Alaska 0California 275 2 1,732 8 2,017Connecticut 584 6 13 7 0 611Delaware 12 0 16 2 0 30Delaware River 485 6 0 0 0 491District of Columbia 0 0 0 6 6Florida 1,652 10 538 68 2,268Georgia 0Guam 3 0 1 5Hawaii 29 0 4 7 0 39Louisiana 1,093 385 568 62 0 2,108Maine 2,844 0 6 0 0 2,850Maryland 2,522 0 0 2,522Massachusetts 53 0 0 24 77Mississippi 0 588 15 0 0 603New Hampshire 21 0 0 0 21New Jersey 264 5 0 269New York 0 95 3 97North Carolina 0Oregon 25 0 0 0 25Puerto Rico 0Rhode Island 140 0 5 5 150South Carolina 204 10 7 221Texas 1,971 0 0 5 0 1,976Virgin Islands 0Virginia 1,844 0 21 13 1,879Washington 2,904 0 0 2,904





Comment

No data.No data.

Page 28.

No data

Entered data from ADBIncludes secondary contact use.State should review value for full support miles (2522) which are higher than the value for assessed square miles (2478.3). Used numbers from electronic submission because did not receive clarification from state.Includes shoreline waters.Entered Statewide projections from ADB.

Assessment based on 269.15 square miles."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Page 105. Blank categories listed as not applicable.Puerto Rico reported linear miles of estuarine use support rather than square miles.





State should review value for full support miles (2522) which are higher than the value for assessed square miles (2478.3). Used numbers from electronic submission because did not receive clarification from state.

Table C-3e Secondary Contact Use Support in Assessed Estuaries

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0Alaska 0California 517 0 1,494 7 2,017Connecticut 0Delaware 29 0 0 0 0 29Delaware River 15 0 0 0 0 15District of Columbia 3 0 1 1 6Florida 1,652 10 538 68 2,268Georgia 0Hawaii 39 0 0 0 0 39Louisiana 1,652 385 71 0 0 2,108Maine 0Maryland 0Massachusetts 69 0 0 8 77Mississippi 0 1 10 0 0 11New Hampshire 21 0 0 0 21New Jersey 0New York 0 0 0 0North Carolina 0Oregon 25 0 0 0 25Puerto Rico 0Rhode Island 0South Carolina 0Texas 3 0 0 0 0 3Virgin Islands 0Virginia 0Washington 2,904 0 0 2,904


Table C-3e Secondary Contact Use Support in Assessed Estuaries




No data.

No data

Entered data from ADBIncluded in swimming use.Included in swimming use (page 7).Includes shoreline watersEntered Statewide projections from ADB.

No data."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Page 105. Blank categories listed as not applicable.Puerto Rico reported linear miles of estuarine use support rather than square miles.Included in swimming use (page III.C-6).Included in swimming use.Entered data from ADB.Included in coastal shoreline assessment.Included in swimming support use.

Table C-4 Leading Pollutants and Stressors Impairing Assessed Estuaries

Jursisdiction METALS MERCURY ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/LOW DO PESTICIDES PATHOGENS PRIORITY ORGANICS PCB'SAlaska 0 0California 2694 2262 1207 5096 107 2296 1170Connecticut 9 0 231 0 605 13 389District of Columbia 1 1 1 6 1Delaware 28 25Delaware River Basin 835 825 855 714 854 866Florida 142 83Hawaii 10 6 12 6 6Louisiana 3555 3464 157 1083 72 72Massachusetts 3 11 79 9Maryland 32 1326 27 146 88 68Mississippi 570 573 36 11North Carolina 14 44Rhode Island 8 40 42South Carolina 27 72 17Texas 59 14 390 564Virginia 10 1 141 175 13 30Alabama 0 0 1American SamoaGeorgia 2 77 337 2Guam 0 1 1Maine 1 310N Mariana Islands 1New Hampshire 0 0 0 14 0 21New JerseyNew York 120 160 0 350 287Oregon 26Puerto RicoVirgin IslandsWashington 894 69

Total 8,077 6,649 5,324 5,985 4,764 3,652 2,622Percent of Impaired 51.5% 42.4% 34.0% 38.2% 30.4% 23.3% 16.7%Percent of Assessed 26.0% 21.4% 17.1% 19.3% 15.3% 11.8% 8.4%


JursisdictionAlaskaCaliforniaConnecticutDistrict of ColumbiaDelawareDelaware River BasinFloridaHawaiiLouisianaMassachusettsMarylandMississippiNorth CarolinaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirginiaAlabamaAmerican SamoaGeorgiaGuamMaineN Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkOregonPuerto RicoVirgin IslandsWashington

TotalPercent of ImpairedPercent of Assessed

SALINITY/TDS/CHLORIDES UNKNOWN TOXICITY DDT NUTRIENTS COPPER DIOXINS DIAZINON NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS PH20 5 0 5

2473 1747 1958 57 880 910 1712 012 239 0

528

46 841838 90 838 795

23405 846 405 405

533 4 7

550 37 586

0 244

16 34131 0 0 5

1 1 1

10 0 0 0 0

0 4 103 0

527

2,494 2,360 1,958 1,929 1,836 1,785 1,712 1,243 1,205 1,13515.9% 15.1% 12.5% 12.3% 11.7% 11.4% 10.9% 7.9% 7.7% 7.2%

8.0% 7.6% 6.3% 6.2% 5.9% 5.7% 5.5% 4.0% 3.9% 3.7%


JursisdictionAlaskaCaliforniaConnecticutDistrict of ColumbiaDelawareDelaware River BasinFloridaHawaiiLouisianaMassachusettsMarylandMississippiNorth CarolinaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirginiaAlabamaAmerican SamoaGeorgiaGuamMaineN Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkOregonPuerto RicoVirgin IslandsWashington


TOTAL TOXICS THERMAL MODIFICATIONS SELENIUM0 200 10 620

6

838

0

10 1

0 2

1

0 0

4

802

855 839 6205.5% 5.4% 4.0%2.8% 2.7% 2.0%

Table C-5 Leading Sources Impairing Assessed Estuaries

Jurisdiction SOURCE UNKNOWN MUNICIPAL POINT SOURCES URBAN RUNOFF/STORM SEWERS NATURAL SOURCESAlabama 0.04 0.81Alaska 0.02American SamoaCalifornia 1,701.31 1,924.90 1,793.66 652.22Connecticut 385.21 436.88 474.16 296.68Delaware 3.00 25.00 3.00Delaware River Basin 782.00 753.00District of Columbia 1.68 4.43 5.93 3.75Florida 342.20 311.90 402.80Georgia 131.00 77.00Guam 3.69 2.17Hawaii 4.16 1.20 28.32 19.45Louisiana 3,555.00 725.00 155.00 419.00Maine 261.00 48.50Maryland 48.59 163.62 52.91 1,294.86Massachusetts 60.65 12.35 40.05Mississippi 565.30 36.50 587.00 586.50N Mariana Islands 0.62New Hampshire 35.42New JerseyNew York 31.20 258.30 266.00North Carolina 78.00 89.79 51.09Oregon 56.20 31.00Puerto RicoRhode Island 1.18 34.54 44.46 0.91South Carolina 60.75 0.54 6.25Texas 521.40 97.50 79.90 167.90Virgin IslandsVirginia 183.64 113.27 14.44 119.60Washington 91.70 320.96 91.70 825.34

Total 7,592.40 5,778.82 5,045.49 4,440.30Percent of Impaired 48.4% 36.9% 32.2% 28.3%Percent of Assessed 24.4% 18.6% 16.2% 14.3%


JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareDelaware River BasinDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiN Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington


INDUSTRIAL POINT SOURCES ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION AGRICULTURE OTHER HYDROMODIFICATION RESOURCE EXTRACTION0.04

0.02657 0.00

1960.9 650.02 1,745.88 255.11 1,798.71 1,728.0176.29 219.93 6.22

12.00782

0.80 0.80315.2 472.60 368.20 184.00

109.00

0.3 0.02 16.51 0.02162.5 2,808.00 91.00 117.00

146.73 32.92 1,393.1911.27 3.36 1.15

37 0.50

52.70 13.50 201.20 1.70 0.0059.49 51.09

41.70 56.20

9.67 2.8713.92 0.14 1.5294.2 13.70

119.03 173.16183.41 298.04 45.85

4,115.88 3,691.67 2,810.73 2,238.14 2,171.06 1,912.8126.3% 23.5% 17.9% 14.3% 13.8% 12.2%13.2% 11.9% 9.0% 7.2% 7.0% 6.2%




LAND DISPOSAL OTHER URBAN RUNOFF COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW DREDGING UNSPECIFIED NONPOINT SOURCE

0.02 0.00

50.75 0.17 1,490.57 459.7627.08 243.03 249.0913.00

782.000.40 5.63 0.80

477.40

0.08917.00 244.00 69.00

48.507.11 305.24

11.77 32.2325.10 1,173.50 0.50

0.01

74.60 232.1030.95

7.92 24.271.56 21.03

520.80

113.0068.78 91.70

1,713.04 1,682.21 1,465.53 1,491.87 1,467.8010.9% 10.7% 9.3% 9.5% 9.4%

5.5% 5.4% 4.7% 4.8% 4.7%




CROP-RELATED SOURCES CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEMS (SEPTIC TANKS)0.19

0.01

1,294.72 247.1819.02 22.44

13.00

6.18917.00

12.83570.00 25.10

273.70 51.8030.95

0.91

0.9368.78

1,300.90 1,124.59 1,129.268.3% 7.2% 7.2%4.2% 3.6% 3.6%




MINOR INDUSTRIAL POINT SOURCE MINOR MUNICIPAL POINT SOURCE

782.00 782.00

91.00 91.00

37.00

910.00 873.005.8% 5.6%2.9% 2.8%

Table C-6 Summary of Fully Supporting, Threatened, and Impaired Waters in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

JurisdictionFull Support - Evaluated

Full Support - Monitored

Full Support - Not Specified

Full Support - Total

Threatened - Evaluated

Threatened - Monitored

Threatened - Not Specified

Threatened - Total

Impaired - Evaluated

Alabama 0 0Alaska 1 15 16 0 9American Samoa 7 7 30 30 6California 691 84 775 0 41Connecticut 0 0Delaware 0 0Florida 0 0Georgia 0 0Guam 1 1 6 6Hawaii 382 452 834 6 2 8 7Louisiana 0 0Maine 0 0Maryland 32 32 0Massachusetts 0 0Mississippi 53 53 41 41N. Mariana Islands 0 0New Hampshire 0 0 18New Jersey 127 127 0New York 0 0 3North Carolina 0 0Oregon 0 0Puerto Rico 157 145 302 131 131 73Rhode Island 79 79 0South Carolina 0 0Texas 0 0Virgin Islands 173 173 21 21 9Virginia 120 120 0Washington

Total 1,531 807 180 2,518 188 8 41 237 166Percent of assessed for summary of use support 48.0% 25.3% 5.6% 79.0% 5.9% 0.2% 1.3% 7.4% 5.2%


JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiN. Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington

TotalPercent of assessed for summary of use support

Impaired - Monitored

Impaired - Not Specified

Impaired - Total

Not Attainable - Evaluated

Not Attainable - Monitored

Not Attainable - Not Specified

Not Attainable - Total

Total Evaluated

Total Monitored

0 0 0 09 0 10 15

10 16 0 43 10181 222 0 732 265

0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0

10 10 0 0 1722 29 0 395 476

0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 320 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0

18 0 18 00 0 0 03 0 3 00 0 0 00 0 0 0

44 117 0 361 1890 0 0 790 0 0 00 0 0 09 0 202 00 0 120 0

268 0 434 0 0 0 0 1,885 1,083

8.4% 0.0% 13.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 59.1% 34.0%




Total Unspecified

Total Assessed

0 00 250 530 9970 00 00 00 00 170 8710 00 00 320 0

94 940 00 18

127 1270 30 00 00 5500 790 00 00 2020 120

221 3,189

6.9%




CommentNo data.Data from ADB.

error in report - called state for answer 12/4/01Connecticut grouped coastal waters with estuaries.Data not available. State reports 25 monitored shoreline miles.

No data.Included in assessment of estuarine waters.Coastal shoreline miles (32) included in 96 square miles of ocean waters assessed by the State.No data. Included in estuary waters.Entered Statewide projections from ADB for aquatic life support.

Entered swimming use support. NJ reports impairment to shellfishing but asesses that use in square miles rather than shoreline (linear) miles."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Oregon grouped estuaries and coastal waters.

State reports bacteria data were available to assess the entire coastal shoreline.No data.State reports square miles of coastal use support rather than shoreline miles - cannot be combined with national total.Page 83.Report states that based on limited available information, all 120 coastal miles were evaluated as fully supporting State designated uses (page 1.1-3).No data.

Table C-7a Aquatic Life Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0.0Alaska 0.0Am. Samoa 7.0 30.0 4.0 2.0 43.0California 768.0 0.0 41.0 0.0 809.0Connecticut 0.0Delaware 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0Florida 0.0Georgia 0.0Guam 0.0Hawaii 422.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 424.7Louisiana 0.0Maine 0.0Maryland 32.0 0.0 0.0 32.0Massachusetts 0.0Mississippi 52.8 41.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 94.1New Hampshire 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0New Jersey 0.0New York 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0North Carolina 0.0Oregon 0.0Puerto Rico 382.5 88.8 0.0 78.6 0.0 549.9Rhode Island 79.0 79.0South Carolina 0.0TexasVirgin Islands 3.3 0.0 1.2 4.5Virginia 0.0Washington 0.0

Total 1,790 160 45 85 0 2,079Percent of assessed for use 86.1% 7.7% 2.2% 4.1% 0.0%

Table C-7a Aquatic Life Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaAm. SamoaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington



Connecticut grouped coastal waters with estuaries.

not applicable

No data.Included in assessment of estuarine waters.Coastal shoreline miles (32) included in 96 square miles of ocean waters assessed by the State.No data. Included with estuaries.Entered Statewide projections from ADB.

NJ reports on impairment of aquatic life, but assesses that use in square miles rather than shoreline (linear) miles."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Oregon Grouped estuaries and coastal waters.Entered "propagation and preservation of desirable species" use support status.Data from databaseNo data.Data in square miles

No data.No data.

Table C-7b Fish Consumption Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0Alaska 0American Samoa 2 2California 538 0 44 33 615Connecticut 0Delaware 0Florida 0Georgia 0Hawaii 422 0 0 3 0 425Louisiana 0Maine 0Maryland 32 0 0 32Massachusetts 0Mississippi 0 45 0 0 0 45New Hampshire 0 18 0 0 18New Jersey 0New York 0 0 0 0North Carolina 0Oregon 0Puerto Rico 0Rhode Island 0South Carolina 0Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0Virgin Islands 0Virginia 0Washington 0

Total 992 45 62 38 0 1,136Percent of assessed for use 87.3% 3.9% 5.5% 3.3% 0.0%

Table C-7b Fish Consumption Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington



Connecticut grouped coastal waters with estuaries.Data not available

No data.Included in assessment of estuarine waters.Coastal shoreline miles (32) incuded in 96 square milles of ocean waters assessed by the State.No data. Included with estuaries.Entered Statewide projections from ADB.

NJ reports impairment to fish consumption but assesses that use in square miles rather than shoreline(linear) miles."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Oregon Grouped estuaries and coastal waters.No data.No data.No data.Data in square milesNo data.No data.No data.

Table C-7c Shellfishing Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0Alaska 0California 694 0 44 22 760Connecticut 0Delaware 1 0 14 0 0 15Florida 0Georgia 0Hawaii 422 0 0 3 0 425Louisiana 0Maine 0Maryland 32 0 0 32Massachusetts 0Mississippi 0 0 89 0 0 89New Hampshire 0 18 0 0 18New Jersey 0New York 0 0 3 3North Carolina 0Oregon 0Puerto Rico 0 0 0 0 0 0Rhode Island 79 79South Carolina 0Texas 0Virgin Islands 0Virginia 0Washington 0


Table C-7c Shellfishing Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington



Connecticut grouped coastal waters with estuaries.Data from Table III-3 for estuaries.


NJ reports impairment to shellfishing, but assesses this use in square miiles rather than shoreline (linear) miles."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Oregon Grouped estuaries and coastal waters.

No data.No data.No data.No data.No data.

Table C-7d Swimming Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0Alaska 0American Samoa 6 4 10California 695 0 97 121 913Connecticut 0Delaware 25 0 0 0 0 25Florida 0Georgia 0Guam 1 6 10 17Hawaii 421 0 1 3 0 425Louisiana 0Maine 0Maryland 32 0 0 32Massachusetts 0Mississippi 28 93 26 0 0 147New Hampshire 18 0 0 0 18New Jersey 127 0 0 0 127New York 0 0 0 0North Carolina 0Oregon 0Puerto Rico 358 124 12 56 0 550Rhode Island 79 79South Carolina 0Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0Virgin Islands 152 20 7 179Virginia 0Washington 0


85.4%

Table C-7d Swimming Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington



Connecticut grouped coastal waters with estuaries.


NJ reports impairment to recreational use, but assesses that use in square miles rather than shoreline (linear) miles."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Oregon Grouped estuaries and coastal waters.

No data.Data in square miles

No data.No data.

Table C-7e Secondary Contact Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

Jurisdiction Full Support Threatened Partial Support Not Supporting Not Attainable Total AssessedAlabama 0Alaska 0California 754 0 58 69 881Connecticut 0Delaware 0Florida 0Georgia 0Guam 1 0 1 2Hawaii 422 0 0 3 0 425Louisiana 0Maine 0Maryland 0Massachusetts 0Mississippi 0 6 26 0 0 31New Hampshire 18 0 0 0 18New Jersey 0New York 0 0 0 0North Carolina 0Oregon 0Puerto Rico 468 74 0 8 0 550Rhode Island 0South Carolina 0Texas 0Virgin Islands 18 1 0 19Virginia 0Washington 0

0Total 1,680 80 84 81 0 1,925Percent of assesed for use 87.3% 4.2% 4.4% 4.2% 0.0%

Table C-7e Secondary Contact Use Support in Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington

TotalPercent of assesed for use


Connecticut grouped coastal waters with estuaries.No data

No data.Included in assessment of estuarine waters.Including in swimming use (page 7).No data. Included with estuaries.Entered Statewide projections from ADB.

No data."fully supporting or not assessed" not includedNo data.Oregon Grouped estuaries and coastal waters.

Included in swimming use (page III.C-6).No data.Included in swimming use support.

No data.No data.

Table C-8 Leading Pollutants and Stressors Impairing Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

Jurisdiciton PATHOGENS ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/LOW DO TURBIDITY SUSPENDED SOLIDSAlabamaAlaskaAmerican Samoa 10 2California 192 44 44ConnecticutDelaware 25FloridaGeorgiaGuam 17Hawaii 6 1 11 6LouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippi 85 29 26N Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew York 3North CarolinaOregonPuerto Rico 42 3 2Rhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin Islands 4 25 12VirginiaWashington

Total 384 102 53 50Percent of Impaired 88.5% 23.5% 12.2% 11.5%Percent of Assessed 11.9% 3.2% 1.6% 1.6%


JurisdicitonAlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiN Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington


OIL AND GREASE METALS NUTRIENTS PH PRIORITY ORGANICS PESTICIDES

43

44 16 6 20

1 14

29 26 26 26

10

48 46 43 36 32 2011.1% 10.6% 9.9% 8.3% 7.4% 4.6%

1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 1.1% 1.0% 0.6%




NONPRIORITY ORGANICS CAUSE UNKNOWN PCB'S SEDIMENT/SILTATION

6

8

26

18 18

26 18 18 146.0% 4.1% 4.1% 3.2%0.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4%




UNIONIZED AMMONIA

5

51.2%0.2%

Table C-9 Leading Sources Impairing Assessed Ocean Shoreline Waters

Jurisdiction URBAN RUNOFF/STORM SEWERS OTHER URBAN RUNOFF UNSPECIFIED NONPOINT SOURCE LAND DISPOSALAlabamaAlaskaAmerican Samoa 16California 93 5 142 26ConnecticutDelaware 25FloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaii 10 8LouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippi 85 136 75N Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto Rico 6 22Rhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin Islands 6 7VirginiaWashington

Total 241 155 142 123Percent of Impaired 55.5% 35.7% 32.8% 28.3%Percent of Assessed 7.5% 4.8% 4.4% 3.8%


JurisdictionAlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaCaliforniaConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMississippiN Mariana IslandsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth CarolinaOregonPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTexasVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashington


ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEMS (SEPTIC TANKS) MUNICIPAL POINT SOURCES MAJOR MUNICIPAL POINT SOURCE

75 85 85

3

28 2

0 1 1

103 89 8823.8% 20.4% 20.2%

3.2% 2.8% 2.7%




INDUSTRIAL PERMITTED SOURCE UNKNOWN INDUSTRIAL POINT SOURCES MINOR INDUSTRIAL POINT SOURCE NATURAL SOURCES

52

0 16

5 2 2 11

76 29 43 43 9

18

2

0 0

76 54 50 47 3717.6% 14.4% 11.5% 10.7% 8.4%

2.4% 1.9% 1.6% 1.4% 1.1%




CONSTRUCTION SEPTAGE DISPOSAL LAND DEVELOPMENT CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS OTHER AGRICULTURE

63 26 2

1 12

26 26 26

18

2

29 26 26 26 21 206.6% 6.0% 5.9% 5.9% 4.8% 4.6%0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6%




CROP-RELATED SOURCES IRRIGATED CROP PRODUCTION

8 8

8 81.9% 1.9%0.3% 0.3%

Documents

2000 Water Quality Report Table C-1 Total Estuarine and ... · Assessed estuarine sq. mi. from percent method (page 3.3-4) for estuaries and page 3.3-2 for shore miles. Remove this