2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    1/64

    2010Baltic E-Banking ReportResults of 8th annual research study

    Presented at Baltic Economic Forum 2010 23rd September 2010, Riga, Latvia

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    2/64

    Session: The influence of the global financial

    crisis on the banking industryin the BalticStates: lessons learned and road ahead.

    baltic market

    technology trends

    mobile internet

    innovation tools

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    3/64

    Baltic Market Outlook

    Financial CrisisGDP drop - IMF bailouts

    Decrease on Real Estate pricesWages of public employees cut

    UnemploymentSmall indicators of economic growth

    Technology accelerationMobile penetration

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    4/64

    59% of banks reported decreased customer

    loyalty since the financial crisis

    63% say their customers are more pricesensitive

    63% say their customers are shopping

    around and more frequently

    The banks that will win the race to profitabilitywill be those that recognize their customer

    relationships have changed for better

    Market transformation during the crisis

    Source: http://newsroom.accenture.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5035

    According to Accenture research in 2010:

    http://newsroom.accenture.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5035http://newsroom.accenture.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5035http://newsroom.accenture.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5035
  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    5/64

    GO ONLINE / GO MOBILE

    Market transformation during the crisis

    More than 75% of users dont realize that their

    bank has mobile banking. Of those who are aware,

    half use the service.

    Source: FORBES

    http://newsroom.accenture.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5035http://newsroom.accenture.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5035
  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    6/64

    Market transformation during the crisis

    87% of online banking users access

    their banks website more than once

    a week

    Source: Forbes 2010 ForeSee ONline Financial Services Study

    87%

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    7/64

    Market transformation during the crisis

    29% havent enrolled in online billpay because they are worried about

    security

    Source: ComScore State of Online Banking 2010

    29%

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    8/64

    How do you drive through crisis

    Customers Banks

    Reduce visit to branches Realize reduction of costs

    Reduce calling to call centers Save money in call centers

    Generate more transactions Reduce cost of services

    Have more privacy over operations Clients feel more secure

    Be more aware of money Marketing savings products

    The only good way to gain customer satisfaction and

    reduce costs is to build convenient tools which will make

    users independent decision and flexible without visiting

    the branches by automating most of the stuff online

    Market transformation during the crisis

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    9/64

    2010Baltic E-Banking Report

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    10/64

    independentresearch study

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    11/64

    of retail banks

    electronic communication

    channels

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    12/64

    which are

    Public WebsiteInternet Banking System

    Mobile

    Social Media

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    13/64

    conducted in

    countries 3Lithuania

    Latvia

    Estonia

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    14/64

    since 2003

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    15/64

    banks

    covered

    42+3 this year

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    16/64

    6 categories

    30 sub-categories

    550individual criteria

    structured into

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    17/64

    innovationnew criteria

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    18/64

    Innovation

    Financial Tracking ToolsSocial Media Usage

    Live Online Support

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    19/64

    Why Innovation is important

    57% use social media networks only

    to connect with friends and family.

    Source: Mintel

    22%think that social mediasites help them make

    good purchase decision

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    20/64

    highlight

    resultsE-Banking Report 2010

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    21/64

    functionalitycriteria

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    22/64

    It aims to evaluate the variety of functions

    that banks offer to their customers online.

    Functions and services grouped are into 15

    logical subcategories for evaluation.

    1. Sign-up 2. Login 3. Transactions 4. Account information

    5. Payment options 6. Deposits 7. Loans 8. Leasing

    9. Security measures 10. Languages 11. Help system 12. Investment

    13. Payment cards 14. Insurance 15. Other services

    methodology

    functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    23/64

    Results of Functionality in Lithuania

    Functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    24/64

    0 2040 60

    80 100

    Swedbank

    SEB bankas

    Bankas SNORAS

    DnB NORDSiauliu bankas

    Danske bankas

    Parex bankas

    Nordea

    Ukio bankasFinasta

    Medicinos bankas

    Handelsbanken

    Average

    Results of Functionality in Lithuania

    Functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    25/64

    0 2040 60

    80 10086

    84

    78

    77

    67

    65

    65

    61

    59

    43

    42

    31

    63

    Swedbank

    SEB bankas

    Bankas SNORAS

    DnB NORDSiauliu bankas

    Danske bankas

    Parex bankas

    Nordea

    Ukio bankasFinasta

    Medicinos bankas

    Handelsbanken

    Average

    Results of Functionality in Lithuania

    Functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    26/64

    Results of Functionality in Latvia

    Functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    27/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    SEB Banka

    Swedbank

    NORVIK BANKA

    Latvijas Krajbanka

    Nordea

    DnB NORD Banka

    GE Money Bank

    Parex Banka

    Latvijas Hipoteku un z. b.

    PrivatBank

    Latvijas Biznesa Banka

    TRASTA komercbanka

    SMP BankRegionala Investiciju Banka

    Danske Bank

    Latvijas Pasta Banka

    LTB Bank

    Svenska Handelsbanken

    Average

    Results of Functionality in Latvia

    Functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    28/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    84

    80

    79

    71

    65

    6358

    57

    54

    5350

    4847

    4644

    4239

    33

    56

    SEB Banka

    Swedbank

    NORVIK BANKA

    Latvijas Krajbanka

    Nordea

    DnB NORD Banka

    GE Money Bank

    Parex Banka

    Latvijas Hipoteku un z. b.

    PrivatBank

    Latvijas Biznesa Banka

    TRASTA komercbanka

    SMP BankRegionala Investiciju Banka

    Danske Bank

    Latvijas Pasta Banka

    LTB Bank

    Svenska Handelsbanken

    Average

    Results of Functionality in Latvia

    Functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    29/64

    Results of Functionality in Estonia

    Functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    30/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    Sampo pank

    Swedbank

    SEB

    NordeaKredidipank

    DNB NORD Pank

    MARFIN PANK

    Tallina Aripank

    Parex pankLHV

    Handelsbanken Eesti

    UniCredit Bank

    Average

    Results of Functionality in Estonia

    Functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    31/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    77

    70

    70

    63

    56

    44

    43

    42

    41

    37

    36

    29

    51

    Sampo pank

    Swedbank

    SEB

    NordeaKredidipank

    DNB NORD Pank

    MARFIN PANK

    Tallina Aripank

    Parex pankLHV

    Handelsbanken Eesti

    UniCredit Bank

    Average

    Results of Functionality in Estonia

    Functionality

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    32/64

    Average Functionality Results 2010 vs 2009

    Functionality

    2009 2010 Change

    62% 63% +1%

    52% 56% +4%

    61% 51% -10%

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    33/64

    methodology

    customer service responsiveness

    It measures how quickly and how effectivelybanks react to email questions of current

    and potential customers.

    12 emails are sent during 14 days to all banks

    on the same time.

    Replies are evaluated based on:

    Timing

    Accuracy Contacts

    Politeness Writing style

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    34/64

    Results of Responsiveness in Lithuania

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    35/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    Ukio bankas

    Nordea

    Danske bankas

    HandelsbankenDnB NORD

    Bankas SNORAS

    Finasta

    SEB bankas

    Siauliu bankasSwedbank

    Parex bankas

    Medicinos bankas

    Average

    Results of Responsiveness in Lithuania

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    36/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    91

    76

    69

    64

    63

    58

    55

    52

    52

    49

    46

    25

    63

    Ukio bankas

    Nordea

    Danske bankas

    HandelsbankenDnB NORD

    Bankas SNORAS

    Finasta

    SEB bankas

    Siauliu bankasSwedbank

    Parex bankas

    Medicinos bankas

    Average

    Results of Responsiveness in Lithuania

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    37/64

    Results of Responsiveness in Latvia

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    38/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    PrivatBank

    Swedbank

    NORVIK BANKA

    Latvijas Hipoteku un z. b.

    TRASTA komercbanka

    SEB BankaDnB NORD Banka

    Danske Bank

    Parex Banka

    LTB Bank

    Latvijas Biznesa Banka

    GE Money Bank

    Latvijas KrajbankaSMP Bank

    Svenska Handelsbanken

    Latvijas Pasta Banka

    Regionala Investiciju Banka

    Nordea

    Average

    Results of Responsiveness in Latvia

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    39/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    89

    88

    86

    86

    86

    8483

    83

    78

    75

    73

    706562

    61

    6054

    52

    74

    PrivatBank

    Swedbank

    NORVIK BANKA

    Latvijas Hipoteku un z. b.

    TRASTA komercbanka

    SEB BankaDnB NORD Banka

    Danske Bank

    Parex Banka

    LTB Bank

    Latvijas Biznesa Banka

    GE Money Bank

    Latvijas KrajbankaSMP Bank

    Svenska Handelsbanken

    Latvijas Pasta Banka

    Regionala Investiciju Banka

    Nordea

    Average

    Results of Responsiveness in Latvia

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    40/64

    Results of Responsiveness in Estonia

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    41/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    Tallina Aripank

    DNB NORD Pank

    LHV

    SwedbankNordea

    UniCredit Bank

    Sampo pank

    SEB

    MARFIN PANKParex pank

    Handelsbanken Eesti

    Kredidipank

    Average

    Results of Responsiveness in Estonia

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    42/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    89

    86

    85

    84

    81

    77

    73

    70

    68

    68

    67

    65

    76

    Tallina Aripank

    DNB NORD Pank

    LHV

    SwedbankNordea

    UniCredit Bank

    Sampo pank

    SEB

    MARFIN PANKParex pank

    Handelsbanken Eesti

    Kredidipank

    Average

    Results of Responsiveness in Estonia

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    43/64

    Average CSR Results 2010 vs 2009

    2009 2010 Change

    70% 58% -12%

    50% 74% +24%

    56% 76% +20%

    Responsiveness

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    44/64

    methodology

    innovation

    It measures the if banks are actively presentin main popular social networks

    If banks offer stand-alone apps for finance

    management

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    45/64

    methodology

    innovation

    It measures the if banks are actively presentin main popular social networks

    If banks offer stand-alone apps for finance

    management

    It measures if banks offering costumer

    support using live chat features

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    46/64

    Results of Innovation in Lithuania

    Innovation

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    47/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    Swedbank

    SEB bankas

    Bankas SNORAS

    Siauliu bankas

    Ukio bankas

    Nordea

    Danske bankas

    Handelsbanken

    DnB NORD

    Finasta

    Parex bankas

    Medicinos bankas

    Average

    Results of Innovation in Lithuania

    Innovation

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    48/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    31

    8

    8

    8

    5

    Swedbank

    SEB bankas

    Bankas SNORAS

    Siauliu bankas

    Ukio bankas

    Nordea

    Danske bankas

    Handelsbanken

    DnB NORD

    Finasta

    Parex bankas

    Medicinos bankas

    Average

    Results of Innovation in Lithuania

    Innovation

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    49/64

    Results of Innovation in Latvia

    Innovation

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    50/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    Swedbank

    Nordea

    PrivatBank

    SEB Banka

    NORVIK BANKA

    Parex BankaSMP Bank

    Latvijas Hipoteku un z. b.

    TRASTA komercbanka

    DnB NORD Banka

    Danske Bank

    LTB Bank

    Latvijas Biznesa Banka

    GE Money Bank

    Latvijas Krajbanka

    Svenska Handelsbanken

    Latvijas Pasta Banka

    Regionala Investiciju Banka

    Average

    Results of Innovation in Latvia

    Innovation

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    51/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    22

    171717

    8

    88

    5

    Swedbank

    Nordea

    PrivatBank

    SEB Banka

    NORVIK BANKA

    Parex BankaSMP Bank

    Latvijas Hipoteku un z. b.

    TRASTA komercbanka

    DnB NORD Banka

    Danske Bank

    LTB Bank

    Latvijas Biznesa Banka

    GE Money Bank

    Latvijas Krajbanka

    Svenska Handelsbanken

    Latvijas Pasta Banka

    Regionala Investiciju Banka

    Average

    Results of Innovation in Latvia

    Innovation

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    52/64

    Results of Innovation in Estonia

    Innovation

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    53/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    LHV

    Swedbank

    SEB

    Handelsbanken Eesti

    DNB NORD Pank

    Nordea

    Tallina Aripank

    UniCredit Bank

    Sampo pank

    MARFIN PANK

    Parex pank

    Kredidipank

    Average

    Results of Innovation in Estonia

    Innovation

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    54/64

    0 2040 60 80

    100

    33

    31

    25

    8

    8

    8

    9

    LHV

    Swedbank

    SEB

    Handelsbanken Eesti

    DNB NORD Pank

    Nordea

    Tallina Aripank

    UniCredit Bank

    Sampo pank

    MARFIN PANK

    Parex pank

    Kredidipank

    Average

    Results of Innovation in Estonia

    Innovation

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    55/64

    Average Innovation Results 2010

    Innovation

    Fin. Tracking Tools Social media Online Support

    6% 8% 0%

    4% 10% 3%

    6% 21% 2%

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    56/64

    OverallComposite

    Ranking

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    57/64

    Composite Ranking in Lithuania 2009

    !"#$%&'()

    !'*+&!)

    $,%)'*+$)

    -&+#.)

    !#%)

    !/&01/0)

    0(/*))

    $&'!(#)

    '*+$#&)

    2#$/3/'*!)

    4/'&!5&)

    6&'$#1!%&'(#')

    !"#

    $!"#

    %!"#

    &!"#

    '!"#

    (!"#

    )!"#

    *!"#

    +!"#

    ,!"#

    $!!"#

    !"# $!"# %!"# &!"# '!"# (!"# )!"# *!"# +!"# ,!"# $!!"#

    &55+&35/'7'#"

    )31/#'5!

    +#5&/'/'7)#./!5/'7)31/#'5!)

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    58/64

    Composite Ranking in Lithuania 2010

    !"#$%&'()

    !'*+&!)

    $,%)'*+$)

    -&+#.)

    !#%)

    !/&01/0)

    0(/*))

    $&'!(#)

    '*+$#&)

    2#$/3/'*!)

    4/'&!5&)

    6&'$#1!%&'(#')

    !"#

    $!"#

    %!"#

    &!"#

    '!"#

    (!"#

    )!"#

    *!"#

    +!"#

    ,!"#

    $!!"#

    !"# $!"# %!"# &!"# '!"# (!"# )!"# *!"# +!"# ,!"# $!!"#

    &55+&35/'7'#"

    )31/#'5!

    +#5&/'/'7)#./!5/'7)31/#'5!)

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    59/64

    Composite Ranking in Latvia 2009

    !"#$%&"'#()*+,-.,&/#

    .,0-*/1$2#

    23"4.,&/#

    &%)+*/#

    4&.#&%)4#

    &%)4",#

    /),5.,&/,#

    4,&2/"#

    2".#

    )"!*%&,01#

    .*6&"2,#

    2+"&2/,#

    (,)"7#

    2$(#

    0-.#

    +"8#

    !"#

    $!"#

    %!"#

    &!"#

    '!"#

    (!"#

    )!"#

    *!"#

    +!"#

    ,!"#

    $!!"#

    !"# $!"# %!"# &!"# '!"# (!"# )!"# *!"# +!"# ,!"# $!!"#

    ,--),9-*&!&"3#90*"&-2

    )"-,*&*&!#"7*2-*&!#90*"&-2#

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    60/64

    Composite Ranking in Latvia 2010

    !"#$%&"'#

    ("!)%&*+*# ,*&-."#

    ,&/##&%(,#/*&.*#

    &%(0).#

    .(*1/*&.*# &%(,"*#2*("3#

    -"/#

    2()0*4#

    2*-4*#/*&.*#

    +4/#

    -5",/*&.#

    /)6&"-*#/*&.*#

    -$2#

    -0"&-.*#

    7)2%4".*#4(*-4*#

    !"#

    $!"#

    %!"#

    &!"#

    '!"#

    (!"#

    )!"#

    *!"#

    +!"#

    ,!"#

    $!!"#

    !"# $!"# %!"# &!"# '!"# (!"# )!"# *!"# +!"# ,!"# $!!"#

    *44(*84)&!&"5#8+)"&4-

    ("4*)&)&!#"3)-4)&!#8+)"&4-#

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    61/64

    Composite Ranking in Estonia 2009

    !"#$%%$%&'(!)

    *+#$,'(!)

    &'"#-)

    *#,)*'.&/)

    $0,)(/"$)

    .'"1%()

    (/"$#')

    2'($#3*,'(!#()

    '"%&'(!)

    !"#

    $!"#

    %!"#

    &!"#

    '!"#

    (!"#

    )!"#

    *!"#

    +!"#

    ,!"#

    $!!"#

    !"# $!"# %!"# &!"# '!"# (!"# )!"# *!"# +!"# ,!"# $!!"#

    '44"'54%(6(#+

    )53%#(4*

    "#4'%(%(6)#-%*4%(6)53%#(4*)

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    62/64

    Composite Ranking in Estonia 2010

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    63/64

    Trends and Recommendation

    Trends Recommendation

    Building trust for brand More Social Media presence

    Saving and Investmenttools / Analytics

    Easy money management and financial planningtools (mint.com, manofinansai.lt)

    Mobile devicesiPhone/iPad, Blackberry, Android apps for e-

    banking (Swedbank has iPhone app in Sweden)

    Leveraging the mobile

    penetration rate

    More efforts on Mobile Banking, easy to use, fully

    functional, trusted and integrated.

    Collective problem

    solving

    Provide the space where clients can support each

    other (getsatisfaction.com)

    2010

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Baltic E Banking Report[1]

    64/64

    2010Baltic E-Banking Report

    pre-order now full report!

    www.metasite.net/report

    Release Date: 15 October 2010

    http://www.metasite.net/http://www.metasite.net/