Upload
abhisek-mitra
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
1/33
1Established 1803
Jay Shankar
(91 22) 6766 3442
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
2/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 2
Minimalist government aiming for inclusive growth
What he means
Governments need to don the role of facilitator instead of actively participating in
the growth process
Focus on growth a necessary but not sufficient condition for economicdevelopment. It must be complemented by the notion of economic equity to
make the growth process inclusive
What he means
Governments need to don the role of facilitator instead of actively participating in
the growth process
Focus on growth a necessary but not sufficient condition for economicdevelopment. It must be complemented by the notion of economic equity to
make the growth process inclusive
What the FM said
An enabling government does not try to deliver directly to the citizens everything that
they need. Instead it creates an enabling ethos so that individual enterprise and
creativity can flourish. Government concentrates on supporting and delivering
services to the disadvantaged sections of society.
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
3/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 3
Broad themes
Path to fiscal prudence clearly charted out in Budget 2010; fine balance achieved between the twinobjectives ofpromoting growth at this nascent stage of Indias economic recovery and fiscal consolidation
Governments social obligations fulfilled with several new programmes introduced for socially weakersections. Budget also in tune with modern-day realities such as climate change and the need for clean energy
Personal tax slabs increased, leaving more money in the hands of consumers; private consumption demand,which had suffered a setback during the slowdown, likely to pick up
Investment boosters include simplification of FDI regime, set-up of a Financial Stability and DevelopmentCouncil, extension of banking licences to NBFCs and private players, recapitalising PSU and Regional Banks
Continued focus on agriculture (incentivising increased output, credit support and food processing sector),infrastructure and energy
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
4/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 4
Key announcements
Reduction in net market borrowing from Rs 3,980bn in FY10 to Rs 3,450bn in FY11 allays fears ofgovernment borrowing crowding out private investment and will also prevent a hardening of interest rates
Divestment target for FY10 increased from Rs 11.2bn to Rs 259.6bn, and further to Rs 400bn for FY11
No petroleum price deregulation as envisaged by the Kirit Parikh report, but FM points to policy decisions onthis front in due course
Tax slab increased a key driver for consumption growthSlabs: Up to Rs 160,000: NIL 160,000 to 500,000: 10% 500,000 to 800,000: 20% > 800,000: 30%
Hike in MAT from 15% to 18% but marginal impact, as partially counterbalanced by a cut in surcharge oncorporates to 7.5% from 10%
Excise duty rolled back partially to 10% from 8%. Service tax retained at 10%; new services brought underthe tax net. FM proposes to roll out GST and DTC before April 2011
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
5/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 5
Fiscal deficit ratio to narrow
(1.9)(3.2)(3.0)as % of GDP
133195175Primary Deficit (5.5)(6.7)(6.8)as % of GDP
315264278On Revenue Account
381414401Fiscal Deficit
(4.0)(5.3)(4.8)as % of GDP
277329283Revenue Deficit
150115124Capital Expenditure
959906897Revenue Expenditure1,1091,0221,021Total Expenditure
585147On Capital Account
373315325Plan Expenditure
936477On Capital Account
249220226Interest Payments
644642619On Revenue Account of which,
736706696Non-plan Expenditure
1,1091,0221,021Total Receipts
381414401Borrowings and other Liabilities*
40261Other Receipts
544Recoveries of Loans
427444406Capital Receipts 148112140Non-tax Revenue
534465474Tax Revenue (net to Centre)
682577614Revenue Receipts
2010-2011Budget Estimates
2009-2010Revised Estimates
2009-2010Budget Estimates
(Rs bn)
Budget at a glance
The 3G auction money will nowcome in FY11
Governments net market borrowingprojected at Rs 345bn
15% increase in Plan expenditure, butincrease in non-Plan expenditure only6% over BE of the previous year
Revenue and fiscal deficit ratio todecrease due to improved revenuesand higher GDP in the denominator
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
6/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 6
Revenue receipt estimates overly optimistic
682.2577.3614.5Total Revenue Receipts
148.1112.2140.3Total Non-Tax Revenue 0.91.10.8Receipts of Union Territories
Fund/NDRF
74.636.868.5Other Non-Tax Revenue
2.13.12.1External Grants
51.352.049.8Dividend and Profits
19.319.219.2Interest Receipts
Non-Tax Revenue534.1465.1474.2Centres Net Tax Revenue
209.0164.8164.4Less: States Share
National Calamity Contingency
3.63.22.5Less: NCCD transferred to the
0.00.00.0Territories
1.71.61.6Taxes of the Union
68.058.065.0Service Tax
132.0102.0106.5Union Excise Duties
115.084.598.0Customs
8.16.90.4Other Taxes and Duties*
120.6125.0112.9Income Tax
301.3255.1256.7Corporation Tax 746.7633.1641.1Gross Tax Revenue
Tax Revenue
Revenue Receipts
2010-11Budget Estimates
2009-10Revised Estimates
2009-10Budget Estimates
(Rs bn)
Receipts
Receipt estimates overly aggressive:
36% increase in customs duty overFY10 RE (~15% of gross tax revenue)
18% increase in corporate tax (~40%share)
30% increase in excise duties (~18%share)
Still, the FMs confidence in thesenumbers has been cheered by themarkets, especially the one oncorporate tax!
Divestment target of Rs 400bn reflects
aggressiveness of the govt divestmentprogramme
Success hinges on continued buoyancyin market sentiment and conservativepricing of public offers especiallyrelevant in the backdrop of a lukewarm
response to NTPC
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
7/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 7
Infra thrust in FY11 Central Plan
524.5425.6447.9Grand Total
1.51.41.4General Services
127.6101.4103.9Social Services***
7.65.46.3General Economic Services
13.79.911.2Science Technology &Environment
18.516.116.7Communications
102.088.994.3Transport **
39.030.735.7Industry and Minerals
146.6109.7115.6Energy
0.50.40.4Irrigation and Flood Control
55.251.651.8Rural Development*
12.310.110.6Agriculture and Allied Activities
2010-11Budget Estimates
2009-10Revised Estimates
2009-10Budget Estimates
(Rs bn)
Central plan outlay by sectors
Energy, transport and social services,accounting for 28%, 19% and 24%respectively of the total central planoutlay, have seen a sharp increase of34%, 15% and 26% respectively
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
8/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 8
Fiscal consolidation and economic growth
Fiscal deficit in India at unsustainable levels
Consolidated deficit for the Centre and states is above 11%,
levels seen around the early 1990 crisis years
Roadmap for fiscal consolidation envisages targets of 5.5%,4.8% and 4.1% for FY11, FY12 and FY13 respectively
Fiscal targets and a reined-in net market borrowing number
cheered by the market
Q3FY10 GDP slowdown to 6% YoY a one-off and does not
change the long-term positive outlook
Impact of the worst drought since 1972 on agriculture
largely came through in late 2009 agri output (17% of
GDP) fell by 2.8%
But winter rains and rabi crops have been better andagriculture will augment GDP again in coming quarters
Main drivers of Indias upswing, manufacturing and
services, stayed strong in Q3 and will continue to perform
impressively in 2010 even as policy stimuli are withdrawn
Government expects GDP growth to average 7-7.5% in
FY10, 8.25-8.75% in FY11 and 9%+ in FY12, followed by a
double-digit print fairly attainable targets in our view
02468
1012
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10(RE)
FY11(BE)
FY12(BE)
FY13(BE)
Central Govt. Fiscal Deficit
General Govt. (consolidated) Fiscal Deficit(% of GDP)
(5)
0
5
10
15
Jun-06
S
ep-06
D
ec-06
M
ar-07
Jun-07
S
ep-07
D
ec-07
M
ar-08
Jun-08
S
ep-08
D
ec-08
M
ar-09
Jun-09
S
ep-09
D
ec-09
GDP Agriculture & allied
Industry Services
Impact of monsoon on economic growth is transitory
Fiscal deficit unsustainable
(% YoY)
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
9/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 9
Sector-wise impact
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
10/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 10
Sector snapshot
ImpactSector Winners/LosersKey measures
Bajaj Auto, Hero
Honda, Maruti, M&M
Excise duties increased by 2%; favourable change in personal
income tax slabs; higher allocation for rural developmentPOSITIVEAutomobiles
Jet Airways, SpiceJet,Kingfisher
Levy of service tax; increase in customs dutyNEGATIVEAviation
BOB, PNB, OBC,Dena Bank
Lower government borrowing in FY11; progressive fiscal deficittargets; capital infusion in PSU banks
POSITIVEBFSI
NoneIncrease in excise duty by 2%; introduction of coal cess; higherallocation to infrastructure and road projects
NEUTRALCement
Nestle, Marico, ITCExcise duty hiked by 2%; favourable change in personal income taxslabs; increase in excise for cigarettes and tobacco
POSITIVEFMCG
All construction cos,
Developers
46% of total plan outlay (Rs 1,735bn) allocated for infrastructure; but
MAT rate a negative for developers
POSITIVEInfrastructure
All stocksIncrease in MAT rate from 15% to 18%NEGATIVEInformationTechnology
Concor, GDL, ArshiyaSops for cold chain and warehouse developmentMARGINALLY
POSITIVELogistics
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
11/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 11
Sector snapshot
ImpactSector Winners/LosersKey measures
NoneConcessional customs duty of 5% for initial set up of Digital Head
End by MSOs; Select online news agencies exempt from service taxNEUTRALMedia
ONGC, Oil India, RILand other refineries
Increase in customs and excise duties on crude oil and petroleumproducts; retail price hike in petrol and diesel
NEGATIVEOil and Gas
KEC, Jyoti, EMCO,Crompton, Suzlon
Increased budgetary allocation; thrust on renewable energy;proposed set up of a coal regulator
POSITIVEPower
DLF, Unitech, HDILAnant Raj, Phoenix
Service tax on under construction property and rental negative forsector.
NEGATIVEReal Estate
NoneHigher disposable income a key positive; but higher excise and
customs duty on gold marginally negative for discretionary retailers
NEUTRALRetail
Bharti, Idea, RcomIncrease in MAT rate and diesel chargesNEGATIVETelecom
Ranbaxy, Dr Reddys,Glenmark, Biocon
Higher weighted average R&D deduction (in-house and specifiedinstitutions)
NEUTRALPharmaceuticals
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
12/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 12
Automobiles
Winners | Bajaj Auto, Hero Honda, Maruti, M&M
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Personal tax slabs broadened
Will lead to higher disposable income; positive for two-
wheelers and passenger vehicles
Higher allocation for rural development
and NREGA schemes
To boost rural disposable income; positive for two-
wheelers and Mahindra & Mahindra-
Increase in excise dutyIn line with expectations; most companies announce a
pass-through of prices hence the impact is neutral8% 10%
Restoring basic duty of 7.5% and levy of
central excise duty of Re 1/litre on diesel
and petrol
Negative for commercial vehicles as profitability of
fleet operators could be affected
POSITIVE
Excise duty hike of 2% in line with expectations and already factored into stock prices
New direct tax proposals to increase disposable incomes; augurs well for two-wheelers and passenger vehicles Proposal for higher fuel prices the only dampener; will affect the CV segment
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
13/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 13
Aviation
Losers | Jet Airways, SpiceJet and Kingfisher
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Increase in customs duty
Negative for all players; will increase operating cost by
1.5-2%. Fuel is 30-40% of operating cost 5%
Service tax on airport services
Neutral for all players; airport charges (15-20% of
operating cost) to rise by 1.5-2%. But service tax paid
can be offset against passenger collections
10%
Levy of service tax on passenger fares
Negative for all players; will increase passenger travel
cost and thus negatively impact passenger traffic and
load factors for airline companies
10%
NEGATIVE
Budget to have a significantly negative impact on the already struggling airline industry
Levy of service tax and increase in customs duty to inflate operating cost of airlines
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
14/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 14
BFSI
Winners | BOB, PNB, OBC, Dena Bank
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Targets set for paring the fiscal deficit
Positive in the longer term as a lower deficit will ease
pressure on loan demand
6.7% in FY10
(revised)
5.5% in FY11
4.8% in FY124.1% in FY13
RBI to mull issue of new branch licences
to private players and NBFCsLicences to be issued post fulfillment of certain
conditions as laid down by RBI.
Reduction in net market borrowing
Alleviates concerns of crowding out of private
investment. Long-term yields to remain at 7.7-8% in the
near term
Rs 3,980bn
in FY10
Rs 3,450bn
in FY11
Thrust on financial inclusionPositive; will support banking services in remote areas
and regions currently out of the banking net
POSITIVE
Increase in allocated amount for capital
infusion in state-owned banks in order tomaintain Tier I capital of at least 8%
Positive for all PSU banks but impact would be greater
for banks like Dena Bank, Vijaya Bank, Bank ofMaharashtra and IDBI
NA Rs 165bn
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
15/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 15
BFSI
Winners | BOB, PNB, OBC, Dena Bank
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
6-month extension for repayment of loans
under Agri-debt relief scheme
Positive for all PSU banks, specially for BOB, PNB and
OBC as they could see provision write-backs in Q4.
But more loan repayment delays likely from farmers
31 Dec 2009 30 Jun 2010
Extension of 1% interest subvention by one
year for home loans up to Rs 1mn andhome cost of up to Rs 2mn
Marginally positive for housing finance companies,
especially Dewan Housing31 Mar 2010 31 Mar 2011
Changes in legislation relating to the
financial sector
Positive; will lead to streamlining of regulations for the
sectorNA
Set up of a
Legislative
Reforms
Commission
POSITIVE
Government target of maintaining gross fiscal deficit at 5.5% and reducing it to 4.1% by FY13 a key positive
We expect benchmark yields to remain in the 7.7-8% range in the near term Allocation of Rs 165bn towards capital infusion in PSU banks in line with expectations
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
16/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 16
Cement
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Introduction of cess on coalMarginally negative as cost of cement production is
likely to increase by Rs 0.4-0.5/bagNil Rs 50/tonne
Increase in infrastructure spending and
allocation to road sector
Positive as it will lead to increased cement
consumption; we already expect a 10%+ increase in
cement demand for the next two years
Increase in excise duty
Neutral as the cost increase will be passed on (barring
south-based players); 2% hike implies Rs 3-4/bag hike
in cement prices
8% 10%
Reduction in excise duty on LED lights Orient Paper to benefit marginally8% 4%
NEUTRAL
Excise duty hike will be passed on; however south-based players may be unable to shift the increased cost burden (impact of Rs 60-80/tonneon EBITDA)
Higher infrastructure spending and extension of concession for low-cost housing likely to bolster cement demand
Diesel price hike to result in higher freight cost; coal cost to marginally increase on account of cess
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
17/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 17
FMCG
Winners | Nestle, Marico
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Change in personal income tax slabs and
thrust on rural schemes
Positive for consumer companies as it will put more
money in the hands of consumers
Increase in MAT rateNegative for MAT-paying companies like Dabur and
GCPL with earnings impact of 2-3%15% 18%
Increase in peak excise dutyIn line with expectations; most companies likely to
pass-through the cost increase hence neutral impact8% 10%
Increase in excise for cigarettes and
tobacco products
Negative for ITC as slab-wise increase in various
categories of cigarettes will lead to overall 15% hike in
excise; we expect earnings impact of 4% for FY11
POSITIVE
Peak excise duty hike of 2% in line with expectations and already factored into stock prices
New direct tax proposals and increased rural spending to boost disposable incomes; augurs well for FMCG sector Increase in excise for cigarettes and tobacco products the only dampener; will affect ITC
Losers | ITC
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
18/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 18
Infrastructure
Winners | All construction companies Losers | Developers due to MAT increase
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Railways allocation hiked by ~6% Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 158bn Rs 167.5bn
Power allocation hiked ~130% (excl
RGGVY)Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 22.3bn Rs 51.3bn
Roads allocation hiked by 13%+ Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 175.2bn Rs 198.9bn
Bharat Nirman allocation hiked ~17.4% Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 409bn Rs 480bn
POSITIVE
Urban development allocation up ~80% Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 30.6bn Rs 54bn
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
19/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 19
Infrastructure
Winners | All construction companies Losers | Developers due to MAT increase
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Deduction u/s 80C specifically for
investments in infrastructure bonds, in
addition to the existing Rs 100,000 limit
Positive for all infrastructure companies Rs 20,000
Increase in MAT rate Negative for all developer stocks IRB, GVK, GMR15% 18%
Hike in IIFCL disbursement targets Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 90bn by
March 2010
Rs 200bn by
March 2011
POSITIVE
Key positives: a) Budget allocates Rs 1,735bn (46% of total plan outlay) for infrastructure; b) Take-out financing scheme expected to initially
provide finance of ~Rs 250bn in next three years; c) Increased spending under various infrastructure schemes Key negative: Increase in MAT from 15% to 18%
Higher defence sector allocation (incl
Rs 600bn for capital expenditure)Positive for L&TRs 1,417bn Rs 1,473bn
Project import status to Monorail projects
for urban transport at a concessional basic
duty of 5% granted
Positive
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
20/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 20
Information Technology
Losers | All companies
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Changes to Section 10AA (SEZ)Clears confusion over tax benefits available from SEZ
units on retrospective basis
Tax benefits
from FY10
Tax benefits
available from
FY05
Increase in MAT rateEarnings neutral due to MAT credit entitlement, but
negative impact on cash flows15% 18%
NEGATIVE
Higher MAT rate to adversely affect operating cash flows of all companies; however, Infosys to see least impact among tier-1 players
No announcement on extension of tax benefits for STPI units, in line with our expectations
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
21/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 21
Logistics
Winners | Concor, Arshiya Losers | GDL
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
ECB allowed for cold chain players Positive for Concor, GDL, Arshiya
Infrastructural benefits for cold chain
players lower customs duty, service taxMarginally positive for Concor, GDL, Arshiya
Customs duty:
~10%; Service
tax: 10%
Customs duty:5%; Service
tax: NIL
MAT rate increased
Surcharge reducedNegative for Gateway Distriparks (GDL), Arshiya
15%
10%
18%
7.5%
Implementation of GST by April 2011 All logistics players- -
MARGINALLY POSITIVE
Increase in MAT rate negative for GDL
Benefits for cold storage and warehousing business marginally positive for players like Concor, GDL and Arshiya
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
22/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 22
Media
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
News agencies which meet certain criteria
and who provide news feed online to be
exempt from service tax
No impact
Project import status to initial set up of
Digital Head End by MSOs with
concessional customs duty of 5% and full
exemption from special additional duty
Positive for multi-service operators
NEUTRAL
No impact on broadcasters, radio, outdoor media and print media companies
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
23/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 23
Oil and Gas
Losers | Refineries primarily Reliance Industries
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Hike in excise duty by Re 1/ltr on petrol
and diesel
Negative for refineries (RIL, Essar Oil, CPCL, MRPL).
Under-recoveries to increase by Rs 106bn in FY11 and
Rs 114bn in FY12
Rs 13.35/ltr,
Rs 3.6/ltr
Rs 14.35/ltr,
Rs 4.6/ltr
Increase in MAT
Negative for RIL (EPS to decline by Rs 2 in FY11 and Rs
3.8 in FY12) and Cairn India (EPS impact of Re 1 in
FY11 and Rs 1.4 in FY12)
15% 18%
5% hike in customs duty on crude oil,petrol & diesel, and other refined products(ex-naphtha, LPG, LNG, CNG, pet coke)
Negative for refineries (RIL, Essar Oil, CPCL, MRPL).
Under-recoveries would increase by Rs 132bn in FY11
and Rs 141bn in FY12. Positive for ONGC and Oil
0%, 2.5%,
5%
5%, 7.5%,
10%
Post Budget: Increase in petrol and diesel
retail prices
Will fully compensate for OMC under-recoveries;
neutral for OMCs, ONGC, Oil India and GAIL
Rs 48.5/ltr,
Rs 36.4/ltr
Rs 51.2/ltr,
Rs 39/ltr
NEGATIVE
Increase in under-recoveries due to duty hikes fully compensated for by post-budget hike in retail prices for petrol and diesel
Duty hike negative for refineries but positive for ONGC and Oil India
MAT rate increase to have a negative impact on RIL and Cairn India
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
24/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 24
Pharmaceuticals
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Hike in excise duty on APIs
Negative for formulation companies; API
manufacturers may pass on the rise to formulation
manufacturers
8% 10%
Excise duty on formulations unchanged Neutral4% 4%
NEUTRAL
Hike in MAT rateNegative for most pharma companies Sun, Lupin,
Cadila, Glenmark, Biocon, Dishman, Jubilant15% 18%
Higher weighted average R&D deduction
(in-house)
Positive for Ranbaxy, Dr Reddys, Glenmark, Biocon,
Cadila, Lupin, SPARC, Piramal Life150% 200%
Higher weighted average R&D deduction(specified institutions)
Positive for Ranbaxy, Dr Reddys, Glenmark, Biocon,
Cadila, Lupin, SPARC, Piramal Life125% 175%
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
25/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 25
Pharmaceuticals
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
NEUTRAL
Partial rollback of excise duty cut on APIs and rise in MAT rate are negatives
However, this is largely offset by higher weighted tax deductions for R&D and lower surcharge rates
Increased allocation to healthcarePositive for the healthcare sector; no major
beneficiaries from our coverage universeRs 195.8bn Rs 223bn
Peak customs duty unchanged Neutral10% 10%
Reduction in corporate tax surcharge Positive; will partially offset the higher MAT rate10% 7.5%
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
26/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 26
Power
Winners | Suzlon, KEC, Jyoti, Crompton
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Proposed set up of a coal regulator
Positive; this has been a long pending demand due to
delays in coal block allocation and lack of transparency
in the allocation process
No regulatorSet up of
regulator
Plan outlay for Ministry of New and
Renewable Energy increased by 61%
Positive for equipment manufacturers like Suzlon
Energy as it will expand the marketRs 6.2bn Rs 10bn
Planned allocation for Power sector
increased (excluding RGGVY)
Positive for KEC, Jyoti Structures, EMCO, Crompton
GreavesRs 22.3bn Rs 51.3bn
Clean energy cess on coal (domestic and
imported)Negative for Tata Power, GVK, Lanco, Adani Power Rs 50/tn
POSITIVE
Competitive bidding for coal mines Negative for utilities as cost of coal will increase
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
27/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 27
Power
Winners | Suzlon, KEC, Jyoti, Crompton
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Increase in MAT rate Negative for private utilities15% 18%
Exemption of excise duty on key
components for manufacture of rotor
blades for wind power
Positive for Suzlon8% Nil
Full exemption from central excise duty
extended to goods supplied to mega power
projects awarded through tariff-based
competitive bidding
Positive for the sector as it will help reduce project
costs5% Nil
POSITIVE
Key positives Increased budgetary allocation, thrust on renewable energy and proposed set up of a coal regulator
Key negatives Increase in MAT and cess on coal
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
28/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 28
Realty
Losers | DLF, Unitech, Anant Raj, Phoenix Mills
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Sec 65(105) made mandatory which
signifies imposition of service tax on rental
complexes
Negative for annuity business model Anant Raj,
Phoenix Mills
FDI regime for ownership and control
recognised as central to the FDI policyWill encourage FDI in real estate
Sec 25(d) of service tax amended such that
construction of new buildings intended for
sale are deemed to be service provided by
the builder to buyer
Major negative for the sector; step likely taken by the
government to restrict the rising prices in order to
match affordability.
NEGATIVE
Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY) for slum dwellersand urban poor to extend support to states
that are willing to provide property rights
to slum dwellers
Marginal positive for HDILRs 1.5bn Rs 12.7bn
Allocation for housing and urban poverty
alleviation raisedMarginal positive for the sectorRs 8.5bn Rs 10bn
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
29/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 29
Realty
Losers | DLF, Unitech, Anant Raj, Phoenix Mills
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
NEGATIVE
Further details on service tax amendment [Sec 25(d)] awaited but if implemented in full, it would be negative for the sector; still unclearwhether land costs would be part of calculations
Sec 65(105) was under dispute; final notification in the budget is a key negative for the commercial space and retail customers
Pending projects given another year for
claiming deduction on profits u/s 80IB(10)Marginal positive for large real estate playersUp to 4 years Up to 5 years
Sec 25(d) of service tax amended such that
construction of new buildings intended for
sale are deemed to be service provided by
the builder to buyer
Major negative for the sector; step likely taken by the
government to restrict the rising prices in order tomatch affordability. Negative for whole sector
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
30/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 30
Retail
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Customs duty cut on raw material
(Rhodium) for jewellery polishingMarginally positive for Titan10% 2%
Excise duty levied on sunglasses (those not
used for corrective vision)Marginally negative for TitanNIL 10%
Customs duty hike on gold bars, coins
Customs duty hike on other forms of goldMarginally negative for Titan
Rs 200 / 10gm
Rs 500 / 10gm
Rs 300 / 10gm
Rs 750 / 10gm
Removal of special additional duty on
watches, garment imports (pre-packed)Positive for all retail companies4% Nil
NEUTRAL
Higher customs duty on gold bars/coins and increased excise on sunglasses (Fastrack) to have marginal negative impact on Titan
Overall, the budget is Neutral for retail companies
Favourable change in income tax slabsPositive for all retail companies as this increases
disposable income in the hands of consumers
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
31/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 31
Telecom
Losers | Bharti, Idea, Rcom
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Higher rural spending via NREGA and
Other schemes
Positive as majority of subscriber additions come from
rural areas
NREGA:
Rs 391bn
NREGA:
Rs 401bn
Personal tax slabs broadened
Positive as it translates to higher disposable incomes
and hence higher spending on mobile phone
usage/data and VAS
Increase in MAT rateNegative for Bharti, Idea and Rcom. Marginal cash
flow and earnings impact of 2-3%15% 18%
Increase in diesel charges
Negative; will increase network operating expenses for
all telecom players and impact EBITDA margin by ~20-
25bps
Rs 36.4/ltr Rs 39/ltr
NEGATIVE
Increase in MAT rate and diesel charges to have negative impact on profitability
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
32/33
Union Budget Analysis 201011 32
Others
Budget Provision Old ImpactNew
Hotels: Benefits of investment-linked
deduction extended to new hotels
2-star and above, anywhere in India
Positive for all hotel companies
8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10
33/33