2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    1/33

    1Established 1803

    Jay Shankar

    (91 22) 6766 3442

    [email protected]

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    2/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 2

    Minimalist government aiming for inclusive growth

    What he means

    Governments need to don the role of facilitator instead of actively participating in

    the growth process

    Focus on growth a necessary but not sufficient condition for economicdevelopment. It must be complemented by the notion of economic equity to

    make the growth process inclusive

    What he means

    Governments need to don the role of facilitator instead of actively participating in

    the growth process

    Focus on growth a necessary but not sufficient condition for economicdevelopment. It must be complemented by the notion of economic equity to

    make the growth process inclusive

    What the FM said

    An enabling government does not try to deliver directly to the citizens everything that

    they need. Instead it creates an enabling ethos so that individual enterprise and

    creativity can flourish. Government concentrates on supporting and delivering

    services to the disadvantaged sections of society.

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    3/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 3

    Broad themes

    Path to fiscal prudence clearly charted out in Budget 2010; fine balance achieved between the twinobjectives ofpromoting growth at this nascent stage of Indias economic recovery and fiscal consolidation

    Governments social obligations fulfilled with several new programmes introduced for socially weakersections. Budget also in tune with modern-day realities such as climate change and the need for clean energy

    Personal tax slabs increased, leaving more money in the hands of consumers; private consumption demand,which had suffered a setback during the slowdown, likely to pick up

    Investment boosters include simplification of FDI regime, set-up of a Financial Stability and DevelopmentCouncil, extension of banking licences to NBFCs and private players, recapitalising PSU and Regional Banks

    Continued focus on agriculture (incentivising increased output, credit support and food processing sector),infrastructure and energy

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    4/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 4

    Key announcements

    Reduction in net market borrowing from Rs 3,980bn in FY10 to Rs 3,450bn in FY11 allays fears ofgovernment borrowing crowding out private investment and will also prevent a hardening of interest rates

    Divestment target for FY10 increased from Rs 11.2bn to Rs 259.6bn, and further to Rs 400bn for FY11

    No petroleum price deregulation as envisaged by the Kirit Parikh report, but FM points to policy decisions onthis front in due course

    Tax slab increased a key driver for consumption growthSlabs: Up to Rs 160,000: NIL 160,000 to 500,000: 10% 500,000 to 800,000: 20% > 800,000: 30%

    Hike in MAT from 15% to 18% but marginal impact, as partially counterbalanced by a cut in surcharge oncorporates to 7.5% from 10%

    Excise duty rolled back partially to 10% from 8%. Service tax retained at 10%; new services brought underthe tax net. FM proposes to roll out GST and DTC before April 2011

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    5/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 5

    Fiscal deficit ratio to narrow

    (1.9)(3.2)(3.0)as % of GDP

    133195175Primary Deficit (5.5)(6.7)(6.8)as % of GDP

    315264278On Revenue Account

    381414401Fiscal Deficit

    (4.0)(5.3)(4.8)as % of GDP

    277329283Revenue Deficit

    150115124Capital Expenditure

    959906897Revenue Expenditure1,1091,0221,021Total Expenditure

    585147On Capital Account

    373315325Plan Expenditure

    936477On Capital Account

    249220226Interest Payments

    644642619On Revenue Account of which,

    736706696Non-plan Expenditure

    1,1091,0221,021Total Receipts

    381414401Borrowings and other Liabilities*

    40261Other Receipts

    544Recoveries of Loans

    427444406Capital Receipts 148112140Non-tax Revenue

    534465474Tax Revenue (net to Centre)

    682577614Revenue Receipts

    2010-2011Budget Estimates

    2009-2010Revised Estimates

    2009-2010Budget Estimates

    (Rs bn)

    Budget at a glance

    The 3G auction money will nowcome in FY11

    Governments net market borrowingprojected at Rs 345bn

    15% increase in Plan expenditure, butincrease in non-Plan expenditure only6% over BE of the previous year

    Revenue and fiscal deficit ratio todecrease due to improved revenuesand higher GDP in the denominator

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    6/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 6

    Revenue receipt estimates overly optimistic

    682.2577.3614.5Total Revenue Receipts

    148.1112.2140.3Total Non-Tax Revenue 0.91.10.8Receipts of Union Territories

    Fund/NDRF

    74.636.868.5Other Non-Tax Revenue

    2.13.12.1External Grants

    51.352.049.8Dividend and Profits

    19.319.219.2Interest Receipts

    Non-Tax Revenue534.1465.1474.2Centres Net Tax Revenue

    209.0164.8164.4Less: States Share

    National Calamity Contingency

    3.63.22.5Less: NCCD transferred to the

    0.00.00.0Territories

    1.71.61.6Taxes of the Union

    68.058.065.0Service Tax

    132.0102.0106.5Union Excise Duties

    115.084.598.0Customs

    8.16.90.4Other Taxes and Duties*

    120.6125.0112.9Income Tax

    301.3255.1256.7Corporation Tax 746.7633.1641.1Gross Tax Revenue

    Tax Revenue

    Revenue Receipts

    2010-11Budget Estimates

    2009-10Revised Estimates

    2009-10Budget Estimates

    (Rs bn)

    Receipts

    Receipt estimates overly aggressive:

    36% increase in customs duty overFY10 RE (~15% of gross tax revenue)

    18% increase in corporate tax (~40%share)

    30% increase in excise duties (~18%share)

    Still, the FMs confidence in thesenumbers has been cheered by themarkets, especially the one oncorporate tax!

    Divestment target of Rs 400bn reflects

    aggressiveness of the govt divestmentprogramme

    Success hinges on continued buoyancyin market sentiment and conservativepricing of public offers especiallyrelevant in the backdrop of a lukewarm

    response to NTPC

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    7/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 7

    Infra thrust in FY11 Central Plan

    524.5425.6447.9Grand Total

    1.51.41.4General Services

    127.6101.4103.9Social Services***

    7.65.46.3General Economic Services

    13.79.911.2Science Technology &Environment

    18.516.116.7Communications

    102.088.994.3Transport **

    39.030.735.7Industry and Minerals

    146.6109.7115.6Energy

    0.50.40.4Irrigation and Flood Control

    55.251.651.8Rural Development*

    12.310.110.6Agriculture and Allied Activities

    2010-11Budget Estimates

    2009-10Revised Estimates

    2009-10Budget Estimates

    (Rs bn)

    Central plan outlay by sectors

    Energy, transport and social services,accounting for 28%, 19% and 24%respectively of the total central planoutlay, have seen a sharp increase of34%, 15% and 26% respectively

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    8/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 8

    Fiscal consolidation and economic growth

    Fiscal deficit in India at unsustainable levels

    Consolidated deficit for the Centre and states is above 11%,

    levels seen around the early 1990 crisis years

    Roadmap for fiscal consolidation envisages targets of 5.5%,4.8% and 4.1% for FY11, FY12 and FY13 respectively

    Fiscal targets and a reined-in net market borrowing number

    cheered by the market

    Q3FY10 GDP slowdown to 6% YoY a one-off and does not

    change the long-term positive outlook

    Impact of the worst drought since 1972 on agriculture

    largely came through in late 2009 agri output (17% of

    GDP) fell by 2.8%

    But winter rains and rabi crops have been better andagriculture will augment GDP again in coming quarters

    Main drivers of Indias upswing, manufacturing and

    services, stayed strong in Q3 and will continue to perform

    impressively in 2010 even as policy stimuli are withdrawn

    Government expects GDP growth to average 7-7.5% in

    FY10, 8.25-8.75% in FY11 and 9%+ in FY12, followed by a

    double-digit print fairly attainable targets in our view

    02468

    1012

    FY06

    FY07

    FY08

    FY09

    FY10(RE)

    FY11(BE)

    FY12(BE)

    FY13(BE)

    Central Govt. Fiscal Deficit

    General Govt. (consolidated) Fiscal Deficit(% of GDP)

    (5)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    Jun-06

    S

    ep-06

    D

    ec-06

    M

    ar-07

    Jun-07

    S

    ep-07

    D

    ec-07

    M

    ar-08

    Jun-08

    S

    ep-08

    D

    ec-08

    M

    ar-09

    Jun-09

    S

    ep-09

    D

    ec-09

    GDP Agriculture & allied

    Industry Services

    Impact of monsoon on economic growth is transitory

    Fiscal deficit unsustainable

    (% YoY)

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    9/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 9

    Sector-wise impact

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    10/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 10

    Sector snapshot

    ImpactSector Winners/LosersKey measures

    Bajaj Auto, Hero

    Honda, Maruti, M&M

    Excise duties increased by 2%; favourable change in personal

    income tax slabs; higher allocation for rural developmentPOSITIVEAutomobiles

    Jet Airways, SpiceJet,Kingfisher

    Levy of service tax; increase in customs dutyNEGATIVEAviation

    BOB, PNB, OBC,Dena Bank

    Lower government borrowing in FY11; progressive fiscal deficittargets; capital infusion in PSU banks

    POSITIVEBFSI

    NoneIncrease in excise duty by 2%; introduction of coal cess; higherallocation to infrastructure and road projects

    NEUTRALCement

    Nestle, Marico, ITCExcise duty hiked by 2%; favourable change in personal income taxslabs; increase in excise for cigarettes and tobacco

    POSITIVEFMCG

    All construction cos,

    Developers

    46% of total plan outlay (Rs 1,735bn) allocated for infrastructure; but

    MAT rate a negative for developers

    POSITIVEInfrastructure

    All stocksIncrease in MAT rate from 15% to 18%NEGATIVEInformationTechnology

    Concor, GDL, ArshiyaSops for cold chain and warehouse developmentMARGINALLY

    POSITIVELogistics

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    11/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 11

    Sector snapshot

    ImpactSector Winners/LosersKey measures

    NoneConcessional customs duty of 5% for initial set up of Digital Head

    End by MSOs; Select online news agencies exempt from service taxNEUTRALMedia

    ONGC, Oil India, RILand other refineries

    Increase in customs and excise duties on crude oil and petroleumproducts; retail price hike in petrol and diesel

    NEGATIVEOil and Gas

    KEC, Jyoti, EMCO,Crompton, Suzlon

    Increased budgetary allocation; thrust on renewable energy;proposed set up of a coal regulator

    POSITIVEPower

    DLF, Unitech, HDILAnant Raj, Phoenix

    Service tax on under construction property and rental negative forsector.

    NEGATIVEReal Estate

    NoneHigher disposable income a key positive; but higher excise and

    customs duty on gold marginally negative for discretionary retailers

    NEUTRALRetail

    Bharti, Idea, RcomIncrease in MAT rate and diesel chargesNEGATIVETelecom

    Ranbaxy, Dr Reddys,Glenmark, Biocon

    Higher weighted average R&D deduction (in-house and specifiedinstitutions)

    NEUTRALPharmaceuticals

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    12/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 12

    Automobiles

    Winners | Bajaj Auto, Hero Honda, Maruti, M&M

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Personal tax slabs broadened

    Will lead to higher disposable income; positive for two-

    wheelers and passenger vehicles

    Higher allocation for rural development

    and NREGA schemes

    To boost rural disposable income; positive for two-

    wheelers and Mahindra & Mahindra-

    Increase in excise dutyIn line with expectations; most companies announce a

    pass-through of prices hence the impact is neutral8% 10%

    Restoring basic duty of 7.5% and levy of

    central excise duty of Re 1/litre on diesel

    and petrol

    Negative for commercial vehicles as profitability of

    fleet operators could be affected

    POSITIVE

    Excise duty hike of 2% in line with expectations and already factored into stock prices

    New direct tax proposals to increase disposable incomes; augurs well for two-wheelers and passenger vehicles Proposal for higher fuel prices the only dampener; will affect the CV segment

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    13/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 13

    Aviation

    Losers | Jet Airways, SpiceJet and Kingfisher

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Increase in customs duty

    Negative for all players; will increase operating cost by

    1.5-2%. Fuel is 30-40% of operating cost 5%

    Service tax on airport services

    Neutral for all players; airport charges (15-20% of

    operating cost) to rise by 1.5-2%. But service tax paid

    can be offset against passenger collections

    10%

    Levy of service tax on passenger fares

    Negative for all players; will increase passenger travel

    cost and thus negatively impact passenger traffic and

    load factors for airline companies

    10%

    NEGATIVE

    Budget to have a significantly negative impact on the already struggling airline industry

    Levy of service tax and increase in customs duty to inflate operating cost of airlines

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    14/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 14

    BFSI

    Winners | BOB, PNB, OBC, Dena Bank

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Targets set for paring the fiscal deficit

    Positive in the longer term as a lower deficit will ease

    pressure on loan demand

    6.7% in FY10

    (revised)

    5.5% in FY11

    4.8% in FY124.1% in FY13

    RBI to mull issue of new branch licences

    to private players and NBFCsLicences to be issued post fulfillment of certain

    conditions as laid down by RBI.

    Reduction in net market borrowing

    Alleviates concerns of crowding out of private

    investment. Long-term yields to remain at 7.7-8% in the

    near term

    Rs 3,980bn

    in FY10

    Rs 3,450bn

    in FY11

    Thrust on financial inclusionPositive; will support banking services in remote areas

    and regions currently out of the banking net

    POSITIVE

    Increase in allocated amount for capital

    infusion in state-owned banks in order tomaintain Tier I capital of at least 8%

    Positive for all PSU banks but impact would be greater

    for banks like Dena Bank, Vijaya Bank, Bank ofMaharashtra and IDBI

    NA Rs 165bn

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    15/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 15

    BFSI

    Winners | BOB, PNB, OBC, Dena Bank

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    6-month extension for repayment of loans

    under Agri-debt relief scheme

    Positive for all PSU banks, specially for BOB, PNB and

    OBC as they could see provision write-backs in Q4.

    But more loan repayment delays likely from farmers

    31 Dec 2009 30 Jun 2010

    Extension of 1% interest subvention by one

    year for home loans up to Rs 1mn andhome cost of up to Rs 2mn

    Marginally positive for housing finance companies,

    especially Dewan Housing31 Mar 2010 31 Mar 2011

    Changes in legislation relating to the

    financial sector

    Positive; will lead to streamlining of regulations for the

    sectorNA

    Set up of a

    Legislative

    Reforms

    Commission

    POSITIVE

    Government target of maintaining gross fiscal deficit at 5.5% and reducing it to 4.1% by FY13 a key positive

    We expect benchmark yields to remain in the 7.7-8% range in the near term Allocation of Rs 165bn towards capital infusion in PSU banks in line with expectations

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    16/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 16

    Cement

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Introduction of cess on coalMarginally negative as cost of cement production is

    likely to increase by Rs 0.4-0.5/bagNil Rs 50/tonne

    Increase in infrastructure spending and

    allocation to road sector

    Positive as it will lead to increased cement

    consumption; we already expect a 10%+ increase in

    cement demand for the next two years

    Increase in excise duty

    Neutral as the cost increase will be passed on (barring

    south-based players); 2% hike implies Rs 3-4/bag hike

    in cement prices

    8% 10%

    Reduction in excise duty on LED lights Orient Paper to benefit marginally8% 4%

    NEUTRAL

    Excise duty hike will be passed on; however south-based players may be unable to shift the increased cost burden (impact of Rs 60-80/tonneon EBITDA)

    Higher infrastructure spending and extension of concession for low-cost housing likely to bolster cement demand

    Diesel price hike to result in higher freight cost; coal cost to marginally increase on account of cess

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    17/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 17

    FMCG

    Winners | Nestle, Marico

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Change in personal income tax slabs and

    thrust on rural schemes

    Positive for consumer companies as it will put more

    money in the hands of consumers

    Increase in MAT rateNegative for MAT-paying companies like Dabur and

    GCPL with earnings impact of 2-3%15% 18%

    Increase in peak excise dutyIn line with expectations; most companies likely to

    pass-through the cost increase hence neutral impact8% 10%

    Increase in excise for cigarettes and

    tobacco products

    Negative for ITC as slab-wise increase in various

    categories of cigarettes will lead to overall 15% hike in

    excise; we expect earnings impact of 4% for FY11

    POSITIVE

    Peak excise duty hike of 2% in line with expectations and already factored into stock prices

    New direct tax proposals and increased rural spending to boost disposable incomes; augurs well for FMCG sector Increase in excise for cigarettes and tobacco products the only dampener; will affect ITC

    Losers | ITC

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    18/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 18

    Infrastructure

    Winners | All construction companies Losers | Developers due to MAT increase

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Railways allocation hiked by ~6% Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 158bn Rs 167.5bn

    Power allocation hiked ~130% (excl

    RGGVY)Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 22.3bn Rs 51.3bn

    Roads allocation hiked by 13%+ Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 175.2bn Rs 198.9bn

    Bharat Nirman allocation hiked ~17.4% Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 409bn Rs 480bn

    POSITIVE

    Urban development allocation up ~80% Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 30.6bn Rs 54bn

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    19/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 19

    Infrastructure

    Winners | All construction companies Losers | Developers due to MAT increase

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Deduction u/s 80C specifically for

    investments in infrastructure bonds, in

    addition to the existing Rs 100,000 limit

    Positive for all infrastructure companies Rs 20,000

    Increase in MAT rate Negative for all developer stocks IRB, GVK, GMR15% 18%

    Hike in IIFCL disbursement targets Positive for all infrastructure companiesRs 90bn by

    March 2010

    Rs 200bn by

    March 2011

    POSITIVE

    Key positives: a) Budget allocates Rs 1,735bn (46% of total plan outlay) for infrastructure; b) Take-out financing scheme expected to initially

    provide finance of ~Rs 250bn in next three years; c) Increased spending under various infrastructure schemes Key negative: Increase in MAT from 15% to 18%

    Higher defence sector allocation (incl

    Rs 600bn for capital expenditure)Positive for L&TRs 1,417bn Rs 1,473bn

    Project import status to Monorail projects

    for urban transport at a concessional basic

    duty of 5% granted

    Positive

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    20/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 20

    Information Technology

    Losers | All companies

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Changes to Section 10AA (SEZ)Clears confusion over tax benefits available from SEZ

    units on retrospective basis

    Tax benefits

    from FY10

    Tax benefits

    available from

    FY05

    Increase in MAT rateEarnings neutral due to MAT credit entitlement, but

    negative impact on cash flows15% 18%

    NEGATIVE

    Higher MAT rate to adversely affect operating cash flows of all companies; however, Infosys to see least impact among tier-1 players

    No announcement on extension of tax benefits for STPI units, in line with our expectations

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    21/33Union Budget Analysis 201011 21

    Logistics

    Winners | Concor, Arshiya Losers | GDL

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    ECB allowed for cold chain players Positive for Concor, GDL, Arshiya

    Infrastructural benefits for cold chain

    players lower customs duty, service taxMarginally positive for Concor, GDL, Arshiya

    Customs duty:

    ~10%; Service

    tax: 10%

    Customs duty:5%; Service

    tax: NIL

    MAT rate increased

    Surcharge reducedNegative for Gateway Distriparks (GDL), Arshiya

    15%

    10%

    18%

    7.5%

    Implementation of GST by April 2011 All logistics players- -

    MARGINALLY POSITIVE

    Increase in MAT rate negative for GDL

    Benefits for cold storage and warehousing business marginally positive for players like Concor, GDL and Arshiya

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    22/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 22

    Media

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    News agencies which meet certain criteria

    and who provide news feed online to be

    exempt from service tax

    No impact

    Project import status to initial set up of

    Digital Head End by MSOs with

    concessional customs duty of 5% and full

    exemption from special additional duty

    Positive for multi-service operators

    NEUTRAL

    No impact on broadcasters, radio, outdoor media and print media companies

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    23/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 23

    Oil and Gas

    Losers | Refineries primarily Reliance Industries

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Hike in excise duty by Re 1/ltr on petrol

    and diesel

    Negative for refineries (RIL, Essar Oil, CPCL, MRPL).

    Under-recoveries to increase by Rs 106bn in FY11 and

    Rs 114bn in FY12

    Rs 13.35/ltr,

    Rs 3.6/ltr

    Rs 14.35/ltr,

    Rs 4.6/ltr

    Increase in MAT

    Negative for RIL (EPS to decline by Rs 2 in FY11 and Rs

    3.8 in FY12) and Cairn India (EPS impact of Re 1 in

    FY11 and Rs 1.4 in FY12)

    15% 18%

    5% hike in customs duty on crude oil,petrol & diesel, and other refined products(ex-naphtha, LPG, LNG, CNG, pet coke)

    Negative for refineries (RIL, Essar Oil, CPCL, MRPL).

    Under-recoveries would increase by Rs 132bn in FY11

    and Rs 141bn in FY12. Positive for ONGC and Oil

    0%, 2.5%,

    5%

    5%, 7.5%,

    10%

    Post Budget: Increase in petrol and diesel

    retail prices

    Will fully compensate for OMC under-recoveries;

    neutral for OMCs, ONGC, Oil India and GAIL

    Rs 48.5/ltr,

    Rs 36.4/ltr

    Rs 51.2/ltr,

    Rs 39/ltr

    NEGATIVE

    Increase in under-recoveries due to duty hikes fully compensated for by post-budget hike in retail prices for petrol and diesel

    Duty hike negative for refineries but positive for ONGC and Oil India

    MAT rate increase to have a negative impact on RIL and Cairn India

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    24/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 24

    Pharmaceuticals

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Hike in excise duty on APIs

    Negative for formulation companies; API

    manufacturers may pass on the rise to formulation

    manufacturers

    8% 10%

    Excise duty on formulations unchanged Neutral4% 4%

    NEUTRAL

    Hike in MAT rateNegative for most pharma companies Sun, Lupin,

    Cadila, Glenmark, Biocon, Dishman, Jubilant15% 18%

    Higher weighted average R&D deduction

    (in-house)

    Positive for Ranbaxy, Dr Reddys, Glenmark, Biocon,

    Cadila, Lupin, SPARC, Piramal Life150% 200%

    Higher weighted average R&D deduction(specified institutions)

    Positive for Ranbaxy, Dr Reddys, Glenmark, Biocon,

    Cadila, Lupin, SPARC, Piramal Life125% 175%

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    25/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 25

    Pharmaceuticals

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    NEUTRAL

    Partial rollback of excise duty cut on APIs and rise in MAT rate are negatives

    However, this is largely offset by higher weighted tax deductions for R&D and lower surcharge rates

    Increased allocation to healthcarePositive for the healthcare sector; no major

    beneficiaries from our coverage universeRs 195.8bn Rs 223bn

    Peak customs duty unchanged Neutral10% 10%

    Reduction in corporate tax surcharge Positive; will partially offset the higher MAT rate10% 7.5%

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    26/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 26

    Power

    Winners | Suzlon, KEC, Jyoti, Crompton

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Proposed set up of a coal regulator

    Positive; this has been a long pending demand due to

    delays in coal block allocation and lack of transparency

    in the allocation process

    No regulatorSet up of

    regulator

    Plan outlay for Ministry of New and

    Renewable Energy increased by 61%

    Positive for equipment manufacturers like Suzlon

    Energy as it will expand the marketRs 6.2bn Rs 10bn

    Planned allocation for Power sector

    increased (excluding RGGVY)

    Positive for KEC, Jyoti Structures, EMCO, Crompton

    GreavesRs 22.3bn Rs 51.3bn

    Clean energy cess on coal (domestic and

    imported)Negative for Tata Power, GVK, Lanco, Adani Power Rs 50/tn

    POSITIVE

    Competitive bidding for coal mines Negative for utilities as cost of coal will increase

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    27/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 27

    Power

    Winners | Suzlon, KEC, Jyoti, Crompton

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Increase in MAT rate Negative for private utilities15% 18%

    Exemption of excise duty on key

    components for manufacture of rotor

    blades for wind power

    Positive for Suzlon8% Nil

    Full exemption from central excise duty

    extended to goods supplied to mega power

    projects awarded through tariff-based

    competitive bidding

    Positive for the sector as it will help reduce project

    costs5% Nil

    POSITIVE

    Key positives Increased budgetary allocation, thrust on renewable energy and proposed set up of a coal regulator

    Key negatives Increase in MAT and cess on coal

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    28/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 28

    Realty

    Losers | DLF, Unitech, Anant Raj, Phoenix Mills

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Sec 65(105) made mandatory which

    signifies imposition of service tax on rental

    complexes

    Negative for annuity business model Anant Raj,

    Phoenix Mills

    FDI regime for ownership and control

    recognised as central to the FDI policyWill encourage FDI in real estate

    Sec 25(d) of service tax amended such that

    construction of new buildings intended for

    sale are deemed to be service provided by

    the builder to buyer

    Major negative for the sector; step likely taken by the

    government to restrict the rising prices in order to

    match affordability.

    NEGATIVE

    Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY) for slum dwellersand urban poor to extend support to states

    that are willing to provide property rights

    to slum dwellers

    Marginal positive for HDILRs 1.5bn Rs 12.7bn

    Allocation for housing and urban poverty

    alleviation raisedMarginal positive for the sectorRs 8.5bn Rs 10bn

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    29/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 29

    Realty

    Losers | DLF, Unitech, Anant Raj, Phoenix Mills

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    NEGATIVE

    Further details on service tax amendment [Sec 25(d)] awaited but if implemented in full, it would be negative for the sector; still unclearwhether land costs would be part of calculations

    Sec 65(105) was under dispute; final notification in the budget is a key negative for the commercial space and retail customers

    Pending projects given another year for

    claiming deduction on profits u/s 80IB(10)Marginal positive for large real estate playersUp to 4 years Up to 5 years

    Sec 25(d) of service tax amended such that

    construction of new buildings intended for

    sale are deemed to be service provided by

    the builder to buyer

    Major negative for the sector; step likely taken by the

    government to restrict the rising prices in order tomatch affordability. Negative for whole sector

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    30/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 30

    Retail

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Customs duty cut on raw material

    (Rhodium) for jewellery polishingMarginally positive for Titan10% 2%

    Excise duty levied on sunglasses (those not

    used for corrective vision)Marginally negative for TitanNIL 10%

    Customs duty hike on gold bars, coins

    Customs duty hike on other forms of goldMarginally negative for Titan

    Rs 200 / 10gm

    Rs 500 / 10gm

    Rs 300 / 10gm

    Rs 750 / 10gm

    Removal of special additional duty on

    watches, garment imports (pre-packed)Positive for all retail companies4% Nil

    NEUTRAL

    Higher customs duty on gold bars/coins and increased excise on sunglasses (Fastrack) to have marginal negative impact on Titan

    Overall, the budget is Neutral for retail companies

    Favourable change in income tax slabsPositive for all retail companies as this increases

    disposable income in the hands of consumers

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    31/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 31

    Telecom

    Losers | Bharti, Idea, Rcom

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Higher rural spending via NREGA and

    Other schemes

    Positive as majority of subscriber additions come from

    rural areas

    NREGA:

    Rs 391bn

    NREGA:

    Rs 401bn

    Personal tax slabs broadened

    Positive as it translates to higher disposable incomes

    and hence higher spending on mobile phone

    usage/data and VAS

    Increase in MAT rateNegative for Bharti, Idea and Rcom. Marginal cash

    flow and earnings impact of 2-3%15% 18%

    Increase in diesel charges

    Negative; will increase network operating expenses for

    all telecom players and impact EBITDA margin by ~20-

    25bps

    Rs 36.4/ltr Rs 39/ltr

    NEGATIVE

    Increase in MAT rate and diesel charges to have negative impact on profitability

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    32/33

    Union Budget Analysis 201011 32

    Others

    Budget Provision Old ImpactNew

    Hotels: Benefits of investment-linked

    deduction extended to new hotels

    2-star and above, anywhere in India

    Positive for all hotel companies

  • 8/6/2019 2010 Budget Analysis 26Feb10

    33/33