Upload
nighb
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 2011-07-09 - Is Assange the Quotworld-spirit Embodiedquot a Hegel Scholar Reports From the IekAssange Troxy Gig
1/3
Is Assange the "world-spirit embodied"? A Hegel scholar repoPublished on openDemocracy (http://www.opendemocracy.net)
Is Assange the "world-spirit embodied"? A Hegel scholar
reports from the iek/Assange Troxy gig
Petri Autio, 09th July 2011Subjects:
OurKingdom [1]
Culture [2]
Ideas [3]
Internet [4]
England [5]
London [6]
Networked Society [7]
Petri Autio [8]
WikiLeaks combats the hidden but constant brutality of institutionalized violence, not just by thenews content it brings to light but by disturbing the formal functioning of power itself: it has the
power to circumvent the oblique ways in which information flows and thereby rewrite the very rules
which regulate how rules can be violated. The critical task is to keep this disruptive strength alive.
After firing off his rapid salvo of ideologico-critical nuggets on the 1st of July at Cadogan Hall [9] in
London, Slovenian philosopher and cultural theorist Slavoj iek revealed what he considers his
favourite meeting between a famous thinker and a famous agent of change.The thinker [10] in
question was, of course, the great philosopher of freedom Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and the
protagonist Napoleon Bonaparte, the year 1806. Hegel, then on the cusp of completing his first
major work, The Phenomenology of Spirit, long enthused about Napoleon as the "world-spirit
embodied." That is to say precisely as an agent (a capable one, to be sure) only contingently thrust
into the world's limelight, pursuing his own aims - mostly oblivious to the true extent of the societalchanges the processes he nominally leads are engendering - but nonetheless producing
emancipation in his wake.
It is only all too tempting to link this anecdote to the proceedings on the very next day, when iek
(who is himself on the verge of completing a book on Hegel) met with the founder of WikiLeaks,
Julian Assange, for a two-hour conversation moderated by the award-winning journalist Amy
Goodman of Democracy Now! The flow of the relaxed event, held at the Troxy in Eastern London in
front of over 9000 onlineviewers [11] on top of the nearly 2000 present in the hall, was carefully
balanced: Goodman set the scene clearly and posed questions about the past and present of
WikiLeaks to Assange, Assange then gave measured and factual responses, after which iekwas
let loose to try and elucidate what he saw as the broader significance of WikiLeaks and the replies
given.
Although the atmosphere at the Troxy was very genial, and iek generally enthusiastic about
WikiLeaks (as he was in the London Review of Books article [12]he published about it), there was a
distinct tension between the rather standard Enlightenment rhetoric employed by Assange (more
facts, a more complete historical record, better educated journalists) and the significantly more
radical conclusions the philosopher was drawing. This is why - whilst it should no doubt be read in a
similar light as ieks own remarks on his position during the conversation (I feel now like that
Stalinist commentator: the leader has spoken, I provide the deeper meaning) - the ventured analogy
nevertheless contains a kernel of truth beyond its bombast: defining the emancipatory significance
of phenomena should not be left to the actors alone.
To illustrate: in response to Goodman's initial question on the significance of the Iraq war logs,
Assange primarily emphasized the concrete revelations WikiLeaks had provided. He mentioned the
400.000 cables leaked, 15.000 previously unreported deaths revealed, a video of an American
helicopter mowing down civilians, and so on. In contrast, iek went far enough to say that even if
Page 1 of 3
http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdomhttp://www.opendemocracy.net/topics/culturehttp://www.opendemocracy.net/topics/ideashttp://www.opendemocracy.net/topics/internethttp://www.opendemocracy.net/countries/england-0http://www.opendemocracy.net/cities/londonhttp://www.opendemocracy.net/author/petri-autiohttp://www.intelligencesquared.com/events/slavoj-zizekhttp://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/letters/1806-10-13.htmhttp://www.versobooks.com/blogs/609-slavoj-zizek-and-julian-assange-in-london-with-amy-goodmanhttp://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n02/slavoj-zizek/good-manners-in-the-age-of-wikileakshttp://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n02/slavoj-zizek/good-manners-in-the-age-of-wikileakshttp://www.versobooks.com/blogs/609-slavoj-zizek-and-julian-assange-in-london-with-amy-goodmanhttp://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/letters/1806-10-13.htmhttp://www.intelligencesquared.com/events/slavoj-zizekhttp://www.opendemocracy.net/author/petri-autiohttp://www.opendemocracy.net/cities/londonhttp://www.opendemocracy.net/countries/england-0http://www.opendemocracy.net/topics/internethttp://www.opendemocracy.net/topics/ideashttp://www.opendemocracy.net/topics/culturehttp://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom8/6/2019 2011-07-09 - Is Assange the Quotworld-spirit Embodiedquot a Hegel Scholar Reports From the IekAssange Troxy Gig
2/3
Is Assange the "world-spirit embodied"? A Hegel scholar repoPublished on openDemocracy (http://www.opendemocracy.net)
WikiLeaks had not revealed a single new thing, it should be considered game-changing. Why?
Because of the very way it functions. For the philosopher, our democracies not only have rules
regarding what can be revealed, but also rules which regulate the transgression of those first rules
(the independent press, NGOs, etc). The contention then is that WikiLeaks operates outside both
these sets of rules, and that there is the source of its power.
In this way, the reply was firmly anchored in the key trope iek haschampioned [13] since his first
major work in English: that ideology in today's "post-ideological" world is not dead, but rather morepowerful than ever -alive not so much on the level of knowledge but in the ways it structures social
reality itself. In other words, we can play a game of where I know that you know (about, say, the
everyday violence that underpins our free society), and you know that I know, although only so far.
Once confronted with information in a naked enough way, the we (the public) can no longer ignore
its false cynical distance to it. Or so iek contended using as an example the difference between a
husband knowing abstractly about his wifes infidelity contrasted with the visceral reaction to
seeing a picture of the act itself. WikiLeaks, he argues, does just this.
That Wikileaks is disruptive is amply shown by the vast reaction against it, whether through the
calls (which Goodman listed) to label Assange a terrorist and assassinate him, in the financial
blockade enacted by Mastercard and Visa (which, as Assange pointed out, have been deemed
unlawful), or by the seemingly extralegal way his extradition is being handled. Here, iek pointsout, the innocence of the accusers is anything but innocent; they decry the violence of WikiLeaks
revelations, themselves oblivious to the military, economic, political and social framework of
everyday violence that goes unmentioned in public discourse. The violence of leaks is on a formal
level, and precisely this is at the root of the Slovenes exclamation to Assange: Yes, you are a
terrorist, but by God, then what are they?
By casting WikiLeaks as a emancipatory, even heroic, phenomenon under constant threat we get to
the true import of the initial analogy: just as the French armies did not fully bring the kind of lasting
social liberation many expected from them, and just as Hegelian philosophy was grossly distorted
and misappropriated after his death, the danger remains that whatever disruptive power WikiLeaks
has will be defused, or even hijacked to work against its original liberating potential. If this is so
then what, precisely, can be done to prevent this?
Sadly, sharp answers were lacking at the Troxy and time ran out before the audience could grill the
all-too-friendly participants with questions. iek did voice his main concern, however: the risk of
WikiLeaks being directly domesticated into the functioning of the official system via a rhetoric of
accepting the projects principle whilst only allowing the right figures to run it.
This I would nonetheless take away as the key message: WikiLeaks should not be seen as merely
another chapter in investigative journalism and free flow of information, but a positive, subversive
emancipatory force by virtue of the way it operates outside the system of secrets and allowed
revelations. What then remains ahead is the hard task of keeping this subversive strength alive.
Remember, by 1814 Hegel had re-appraised the great emancipatory power he had once
encountered, as a "genius destroyed by mediocrity."
SideboxesRelated stories:Wikileaks: the truth is not treason [14]
Cupid's freedom: how the web sharpens the democratic revolution [15]
US power, wikileaks, student protest, Christopher Hitchens and openDemocracy under attack: moral
authority, or authoritarianism? [16]
Country or region:England
City:London
Topics:Culture
Ideas
Internet
This article is published by Petri Autio, and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons
licence [17]. You may republish it with attribution for non-commercial purposes following the CC
Page 2 of 3
http://www.versobooks.com/books/348-the-sublime-object-of-ideologyhttp://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/ryan-gallagher/wikileaks-truth-is-not-treasonhttp://www.opendemocracy.net/openeconomy/tony-curzon-price/cupids-freedom-how-web-sharpens-democratic-revolutionhttp://www.opendemocracy.net/tony-curzon-price/us-power-wikileaks-student-protest-christopher-hitchens-and-opendemocracy-under-athttp://www.opendemocracy.net/tony-curzon-price/us-power-wikileaks-student-protest-christopher-hitchens-and-opendemocracy-under-athttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/http://www.opendemocracy.net/tony-curzon-price/us-power-wikileaks-student-protest-christopher-hitchens-and-opendemocracy-under-athttp://www.opendemocracy.net/tony-curzon-price/us-power-wikileaks-student-protest-christopher-hitchens-and-opendemocracy-under-athttp://www.opendemocracy.net/openeconomy/tony-curzon-price/cupids-freedom-how-web-sharpens-democratic-revolutionhttp://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/ryan-gallagher/wikileaks-truth-is-not-treasonhttp://www.versobooks.com/books/348-the-sublime-object-of-ideology8/6/2019 2011-07-09 - Is Assange the Quotworld-spirit Embodiedquot a Hegel Scholar Reports From the IekAssange Troxy Gig
3/3
Is Assange the "world-spirit embodied"? A Hegel scholar repoPublished on openDemocracy (http://www.opendemocracy.net)
guidelines. For other queries about reuse, click here [18]. Some articles on this site are published
under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless
specifically licensed under Creative Commons.
Source URL:
http://www.opendemocracy.net/petri-autio/is-assange-world-spirit-embodied-hegel-scholar-reports-from-%C5%BEi%C5%BEekassange-troxy-gig
Created 07/09/2011 - 07:32
Links:
[1] http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom
[2] http://www.opendemocracy.net/topics/culture
[3] http://www.opendemocracy.net/topics/ideas
[4] http://www.opendemocracy.net/topics/internet
[5] http://www.opendemocracy.net/countries/england-0
[6] http://www.opendemocracy.net/cities/london
[7] http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/collections/networked-society
[8] http://www.opendemocracy.net/author/petri-autio[9] http://www.intelligencesquared.com/events/slavoj-zizek
[10] http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/letters/1806-10-13.htm
[11]
http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/609-slavoj-zizek-and-julian-assange-in-london-with-amy-goodman
[12] http://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n02/slavoj-zizek/good-manners-in-the-age-of-wikileaks
[13] http://www.versobooks.com/books/348-the-sublime-object-of-ideology
[14] http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/ryan-gallagher/wikileaks-truth-is-not-treason
[15]
http://www.opendemocracy.net/openeconomy/tony-curzon-price/cupids-freedom-how-web-sharpens-
democratic-revolution
[16]
http://www.opendemocracy.net/tony-curzon-price/us-power-wikileaks-student-protest-christopher-hit
chens-and-opendemocracy-under-at
[17] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
[18] http://www.opendemocracy.net/about/syndication
Page 3 of 3
http://%27http//www.opendemocracy.net/about/syndication'http://www.opendemocracy.net/petri-autio/is-assange-world-spirit-embodied-hegel-scholar-reports-from-%C5%BEi%C5%BEekassange-troxy-gighttp://www.opendemocracy.net/petri-autio/is-assange-world-spirit-embodied-hegel-scholar-reports-from-%C5%BEi%C5%BEekassange-troxy-gighttp://www.opendemocracy.net/petri-autio/is-assange-world-spirit-embodied-hegel-scholar-reports-from-%C5%BEi%C5%BEekassange-troxy-gighttp://www.opendemocracy.net/petri-autio/is-assange-world-spirit-embodied-hegel-scholar-reports-from-%C5%BEi%C5%BEekassange-troxy-gighttp://%27http//www.opendemocracy.net/about/syndication'