47
ENERGY EFFICIENT / LOW CARBON GREEN BUILDING PERFORMANCE DESIGN Steve Anthony Lojuntin Deputy Director Energy Efficiency Project Team Sustainable Energy Development Authoritry @ SEDA Malaysia Tel / SMS :+6019-2829102 Email: [email protected] / [email protected]

2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Low Carbon Green Building system to support the Malaysian Green Performance Assessment System for buildings (GreenPASS) and some government low carbon building projects that I had done.

Citation preview

Page 1: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

ENERGY EFFICIENT / LOW CARBON

GREEN BUILDING PERFORMANCE DESIGN

Steve Anthony LojuntinDeputy Director Energy Efficiency Project Team

Sustainable Energy Development Authoritry @ SEDA Malaysia

Tel / SMS :+6019-2829102 Email: [email protected] / [email protected]

Page 2: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Brief about Low Carbon Building

What are the Low Carbon buildings ?

• Low Carbon Building is similar to the

conventional green building system which promotes uses of green technology and green habits to reduce the degradation of the environment.

• Use Carbon as metric for references to achieve the actual environment impact and not based on

points collected.

• Use UNEP SBCI Common

Carbon Metric.

Page 3: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Brief about Low Carbon Building

What are the Low Carbon buildings ?

• Straight forward, transparent, easy to

implement, consistance, easy to monitor since based on actual performance. Measurable,

recordable, comparable, justifiable, can be

monitor and easy to proof.

• Cheaper and affordable since it is straight forward and focus only the relevant criteria that have high impact (lower $$$/CO2 reduction cost).• Global trend- Relevant and gain popularity at international level.

Page 4: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Brief about Low Carbon Green Building

Green / Sustainable / Low

Carbon Buildings

Green Technology

Involved- Energy - Indoor Environment- Water Management- Material used- Site construction-

Green Habits /

Thinking- Awareness / Responsibility- Procurement- Operation & Maintenance- Recycling

Page 5: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

General Green Building System

LOW

CARBON

BUILDING

(Malaysia)

1. Energy

2. Water

3. Indoor

environme

nt

4. Waste

Alternative

under

development

� PRIVATE INITIATIVE �

Gov. Initiatives

-CASBuild for

BCIS (GreenTech Malaysia –

consultancy projects)

- GreenPASS(CIDB)

Conventional Green Building System

Page 6: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Carbon Exist in Most of the Green Building Criteria

Page 7: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

WHERE DOES THE CARBON COME FROM?

Page 8: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Building

LifecycleUse, Management &

Maintenance

[Operational Energy /

CO2 footprint]

Pre -

Design

Decline,

Demolit

ion /

regenera

tion

Design &

Development

Embodied Energy / CO2

footprint]

FACT! Most of the Energy / CO2e emission are during the operation

phase !!

Carbon emission in a life cycle of a building

Page 9: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Green Technology / application in Buildings to reduce carbon foot print

-The green technology in building is mostly refer to the technology

and applications that has impact to the Energy and Environment

related to building services

a) Design : Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy &

Water Management.

b) Office appliances

c) Operation: Energy management in the O&M.

d) Renovation / retrofits

e) Other - Paper and water recycling

- Indoor air quality.

- Solid waste management / separation

f) End users awareness

Page 10: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Relation between use of energy and the

environment

Kawasan 2007

Semenanjung Malaysia 0.684 kg CO2 / kwj

Sarawak 0.873 kg CO2 / kwj

Kawasan Barat Sabah 0.807 kg CO2 / kwj

Kawasan Timur Sabah 0.709 kg CO2 / kwj

Sumber: Laporan Penanda Aras Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Malaysia

2007 oleh Pusat Tenaga Malaysia.

0.684 kg of CO2 emitted to the atmosphere for each 1 kWh electricity generated by power plant (Peninsula Malaysia)

Page 11: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Examples of Government Low Carbon Building

Page 12: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Understand the factors affecting the energy

consumption in buildings that contribute main

carbon emission

OPERATIONAL CARBON ≡ OPERATIONAL ENERGY

Page 13: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Central A/C

55%

Split A/C

7%

Lighting

18%

Plug

loads/others

20%

Source: Energy Audit in

Government Buildings (2003) by Pusat

Tenaga Malaysia / GreenTech Malaysia

Tenaga

Use of energy in commercial buildings

Page 14: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Example of Energy Used in an Industrial

Building

Energy

Page 15: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Load Profile & Base Load

Typical Daily Load Profile

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

17/0

1/2

008 0

1:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 0

2:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 0

3:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 0

4:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 0

5:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 0

6:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 0

7:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 0

8:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 0

9:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 1

0:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 1

1:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 1

2:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 1

3:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 1

4:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 1

5:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 1

6:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 1

7:1

5

17/0

1/2

008 1

8:0

0

17/0

1/2

008 1

9:0

0

17/0

1/2

008 2

0:0

0

17/0

1/2

008 2

1:0

0

17/0

1/2

008 2

2:0

0

17/0

1/2

008 2

3:0

0

18/0

1/2

008 0

0:0

0

18/0

1/2

008 0

1:0

0

Po

wer

Dem

an

d [k

W]

���� BASE LOAD (24 hrs) ����

���� VARIABLE LOAD ����

Page 16: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

A typical Building Load Profile During Working Day

(Extracted from Building Energy Audit Guideline)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

00:00 03:30 07:00 10:30 14:00 17:30 21:00

Time

kW

Total

Air-Con

Light & Power

85 kW

∑=30 kW

Load Profile & Base Load

Page 17: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

∑=14 kW

Load Profile & Base Load

Page 18: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Load Profile of a Building

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

11

/01

/20

08

06

:00

11

/01

/20

08

10

:15

11

/01

/20

08

14

:45

11

/01

/20

08

19

:15

11

/01

/20

08

23

:45

12

/01

/20

08

04

:15

12

/01

/20

08

08

:45

12

/01

/20

08

13

:15

12

/01

/20

08

17

:45

12

/01

/20

08

22

:15

13

/01

/20

08

02

:45

13

/01

/20

08

07

:15

13

/01

/20

08

11

:45

13

/01

/20

08

16

:15

13

/01

/20

08

20

:45

14

/01

/20

08

01

:15

14

/01

/20

08

05

:45

14

/01

/20

08

10

:00

14

/01

/20

08

14

:30

14

/01

/20

08

19

:00

14

/01

/20

08

23

:30

15

/01

/20

08

04

:00

15

/01

/20

08

08

:30

15

/01

/20

08

13

:00

15

/01

/20

08

17

:30

15

/01

/20

08

22

:00

16

/01

/20

08

02

:30

16

/01

/20

08

07

:00

16

/01

/20

08

11

:30

16

/01

/20

08

16

:00

16

/01

/20

08

20

:30

17

/01

/20

08

01

:00

17

/01

/20

08

05

:30

17

/01

/20

08

10

:00

17

/01

/20

08

14

:30

17

/01

/20

08

19

:00

17

/01

/20

08

23

:30

Po

we

r D

em

an

d

[kW

]

∑=140 kW

Load Profile & Base Load

Page 19: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

∑=7 - 8 kW

Load Profile & Base Load

Page 20: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

∑=114 kW

Page 21: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Night Power Consumer ~ 114 kW

Office lighting &

Equipment, 19.1,

16%

Total Split units,

41.8, 33%

Communications

Equipment, 3.7, 3%

Data Center, 8, 7%

UPS losses, 12,

10%

Core Area, 13.7,

11%

Transformer

losses, 7, 6%

Others, 16.6, 14%

Base Load Apportioning

Page 22: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Estimated ACSU Power [W] = 41.806 kWCELCOM

3%

SDF1

5%

SDF2

5%

BMDF

5%

PABX

7%

UPS

24%

SR

2%

BCR

4%

KEBAL

2%

DATA

15%

PID

3%

TELCO

14%

LMR

11%

Page 23: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT !IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT !

COMMITMENT FROM THE

USER / CLIENT

NEED STATEMENT ON BUILDING PERFORMANCE AND EE

/ LOW CARBON TARGET BY THE USER – ‘AS POLICY’

DESIGN

PERFORMANCE

ACCORDING TO THE

NEED STATEMENT

OPERATION AND

MAINTENANCE ARE

ACCORDING TO THE

NEED STATEMENT

USERS / OCCUPANTS

ROLE / INTERACTION TO

THE BUILDING

PERFORMANCE

EE / LOW CARBON BUILDING PERFORMANCE

Page 24: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

INTEGERATED DESIGN APPROACH TO INTEGERATED DESIGN APPROACH TO

GET THE BEST / LOWEST POSSIBLE GET THE BEST / LOWEST POSSIBLE

ENERGY CONSUMPTIONENERGY CONSUMPTION

BRAINSTORM

ARCHITECTSM & E

ENGINEERS

C & S

ENGINEERS

OWNER /

USERS

INTERIOR

DESIGNER

FACILITIES

MANAGEMENT

ICT

CONSULTANT

LANDSCAPE

CONSULTANT

ENERGY / LOW

CARBON / GREEN

CONSULTANT

Page 25: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

INTEGERATED DESIGN APPROACH TO INTEGERATED DESIGN APPROACH TO

GET THE BEST / LOWEST POSSIBLE GET THE BEST / LOWEST POSSIBLE

ENERGY CONSUMPTIONENERGY CONSUMPTION

ROOT CAUSED

ANALYSIS

METHOD

WHY? WHAT?

HOW? WHEN?

WHO?

Conduct Energy & Carbon Performance Analysis

Consider Technologies and

Human Factor.

* Use of technology are not the ultimate solution.

Page 26: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

CHOOSE THE MOST APPRIOPRATE STRATEGIES

COOLING SYSTEM

LIGHTING SYSTEM

EQUIPMENT USED

Wall Insulation?

Façade

design?

Air tight

building?High COP

sys?

VAV?

VSD?

Low losses

distribution?

Low

resistance air

system?

Efficient cooling

tower?

CAV?

Centralise

system?

Stand alone Split

Unit?

Water cooled sys?

Air cooled sys?

Electrical chiller?Absorption

chiller?

High Eff. Motor?EE Office

appliances?

Green ICT?Shared printers?

Energy

Management

System?

Task Light?

EE Lighting?

Daylighting?Light shelves?

Lighting level?

High efficient

reflector?

Double glazing? Radiant cooling?

LED? Induction light?

Rain water

harvest?

Water efficient

fittings?

Page 27: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

SELECTION OF DESIGN STRATEGIESSELECTION OF DESIGN STRATEGIES

- The design and selection of the strategies are depends ultimate design target that required to be achieved !

- Different building will have different design strategies depend on the nature and physical of the building.

- Any irrelevant measures or too expensive could be omitted. Can be justified!

- The best is to put priority strategies that have high performance impact with low or minimum cost to implement (kWh or CO2 reduction / $$$ invested)

Page 28: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

NEW BUILDING DESIGNNEW BUILDING DESIGN

EXAMPLES / CASE

Page 29: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

KeTTHA’sKeTTHA’s LEO Building LEO Building

: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS

Page 30: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

ENERGY- 10 OptimisationEnergy Saving Features in LEO Building

Energy Index kWh/m2year

0 1000 200 300

275Reference Case

247Daylight use

223 EE Lighting 22 - 16 w/m2

195Equipment 27 – 20 w/m2

173EE Light 16 – 8 w/m2

123 EE Equipment 20 - 7.5 w/2

112"Energy Management”

102Room Temp 23 - 24 degrees

100Especially Tight Building

100

239Insulation in walls and roof

EE in Building Guideline Target (136kWh/m2/yr)

56% reduction

Potential GreenPASS (Operational

carbon) Rating

Page 31: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

= 3,366,475 kWh/yror more than RM 800,000

per year

= 3,366,475 kWh/yr x 0.614 kg CO2/kwh= 2,067,016 kg/year CO2= 2,067 tones CO2/year

LEO BuildingLEO BEI = 100

(Conventional) BEI = 275

175 kWh/m2year

Tariff C128.8 sen/kWh

Savings = 56%

Average Building Energy Index (BEI) in Parcel B

[kWh/m2/yr]378

315

278

196

233253

322

349

123

321

268

236

167

198215

273296

114

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 E4/5

Blocks

[kW

h/m

2/y

r]

AVERAGE (3276 hrs/yr) AVERAGE (Normalised to 2646hrs/yr)

Comparison LEO Building with several

buildings in Putrajaya

LEO Building Performance

Page 32: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

TargetCurrent

Average

LEO Monitoring & PerformanceLEO Monitoring & Performance

114

Monthly Energy Index for LEO Building [kWh/m2/year]

64

38

29

16

38

29 28 27

3330 31 32

29

2426 25

23

29

20

3229

2731

2730

26 25

18

35

2631 30 32

35 3330

2426

29

36

111

9490

7883

8890

87

92

87 88 87

79 8077 78

8077

73

80 81 79 8078

74

81 7976

82

92 90 89 90

95 9489 88

83

100

149

122

106

116112

115 117120

122118

120116

103106

102100

109

97

105109 108 110

107 108

99

106

97

111108

123121 122

124128

124

113 114112

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Desig

n

Oct

04

Nov 0

4

Dec 0

4

Jan 0

5

Feb 0

5

Mac 0

5

April 05

May 0

5

June 0

5

July

05

Aug 0

5

Sept

05

Oct

05

Nov 0

5

Dec 0

5

Jan 0

6

Feb 0

6

Mac 0

6

April 06

May 0

6

June 0

6

July

06

Aug 0

6

Sept

06

Oct

06

Nov 0

6

Dec 0

6

Jan 0

7

Feb 0

7

Mac 0

7

April 07

May 0

7

June 0

7

July

07

Aug 0

7

Sept

07

Oct

07

AV

ER

AG

E

AV

ER

AG

E

En

erg

y I

nd

ex

[k

Wh

/m2/y

ea

r]

Cooling Energy Consumption [kW h] Electrical Energy Consumption [kW h] Building Energy Index [kW h/m2/yr]

Building Energy Index

(Based on Energy Bills)

64

38

29

16

38

29

28

27

33

30 31 32

29

24 26

25

23

29

20

32

29

27 3

1

27 3

0

26

25

18

35

26

31

30 32 35

33

30

24 26 26

24

24 25

25 3

0

30 30 3

4

31

28 3

2

30

-

28

64

36

111

94

90

78

83 8

8 90

87

92

87 88

87

79 80

77 78 80

77

73

80 81

79 80

78

74

81

79

76

82

92

90

89

90

95

94

89

85 8

8 89 9

3

90

87

93

91

89

94

91

90 92

87

-

86

36

100

149

122

106

116

112 115

117

120

122

118

120

116

103

106

102

100 1

09

97

105 109

108

110

107

108

99

106

97

111

108

123

121

122

124 128

124

113

110 114

113 116

116

113

122

120

119 1

28

122

118 1

24

118

100

115

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Month

[kW

h/m

2/y

r]

Chilled Water-Cooling Index [kWh/m2/yr] Electrical Energy Index [kWh/m2/yr] Building Energy Index [kWh/m2/yr]

Page 33: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

- Daylighting (almost 100%)

- EE lighting + task lights

- EE office equipment (laptops, LCD monitors, networked printers)

- Green IT Network & server room (75% wireless network)

- EE air conditioning & ventilation

- Floor slab cooling (For radiant cooling and thermal storage)

- PCM storage cooling system (minimised air-cond chillers capacity)

- Controls & Sensors (VSDs, VAVs, CO2, BMS / Energy monitoring)

- Double glazing (heat and sound insulation)

- Roof and wall Insulation (reduce outside heat gain)

- Grid connected BIPV system (Sell energy to TNB / no batteries)

- Rain water harvest system (landscape, aircond and cleaning)

GreenTech Malaysia’s GEO Building GreenTech Malaysia’s GEO Building

: DESIGN ELEMENTS: DESIGN ELEMENTS

Page 34: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

MONTHLY GEO BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE

8,8

24

8,3

68

6,9

93

8,2

13

9,3

94

9,5

23

8,5

86

8,2

05

8,7

96

9,1

09

9,1

05

10

,31

2

8,9

68

8,2

34

10

,06

7

9,5

11

8,0

52

8,5

39

6,7

62

7,2

68

7,4

19

8,4

07

6,1

48 8,7

44

10

,66

0

0

25

,87

6

16

,72

4

25

,78

4

27

,98

1

22

,25

1

24

,85

1

23

,63

5

24

,95

4

23

,77

7

29

,10

2

28

,01

2

28

,41

7

20

,24

4

18

,46

6

20

,11

0

17

,45

6

16

,06

6

17

,32

3

16

,41

0

16

,73

7

16

,19

8

14

,99

5 19

,60

0

17

,70

0

6,1

02

0

97.9

63.0

96

110

90 92 91 9388

111104105

7569

7565 62 64 63 62 60 62

7368

23

0

33 32 3036 35 33 30 33

37 3440

33 3237 35

31 3226 27 28

35

2334

40

00

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

En

erg

y C

on

su

me

d / E

ne

rgy

Ge

ne

rate

d [

kW

h/m

on

th]

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

180.0

BE

I [

kW

h/m

2/y

ea

r]

kWh PV kWh Total BEI [kWh/m2/yr] BEI PV Linear (BEI [kWh/m2/yr] )

kWh PV 8,824 8,368 6,993 8,213 9,394 9,523 8,586 8,205 8,796 9,109 9,105 10,312 8,968 8,234 10,067 9,511 8,052 8,539 6,762 7,268 7,419 8,407 6,148 8,744 10,660 0

kWh Total 25,876 16,724 25,784 27,981 22,251 24,851 23,635 24,954 23,777 29,102 28,012 28,417 20,244 18,466 20,110 17,456 16,066 17,323 16,410 16,737 16,198 14,995 19,600 17,700 6,102 0

Num of Days 13 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 2 0

BEI [kWh/m2/yr] 97.9 63.0 96 110 90 92 91 93 88 111 104 105 75 69 75 65 62 64 63 62 60 62 73 68 23 0

BEI PV 33 32 30 36 35 33 30 33 37 34 40 33 32 37 35 31 32 26 27 28 35 23 34 40 0

Avera

ge

Avera

ge

(with

July

08

Aug

08

Sept

08Oct 08

Nov

08Dec 08 Jan 09 Feb 09

Mac

09Apr 09

May

09

June

09

July

09

Aug

09

Sept

09Oct 09

Nov

09Dec 09 Jan 10 Feb 10

Mac

10Apr 10

May

10

June

10

Monitored GEO Building Energy

Index

Page 35: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

MONTHLY GEO BUILDING CO2 EMMISSION PERFORMANCE

18

11

17.5

3 19.0

3

15.1

3 16.9

0

16.0

7

16.9

7

16.1

7

19.7

9

19.0

5

19.3

2

13.7

7

12.5

6

13.6

7

11.8

7

10.9

2

11.7

8

11.1

6

11.3

8

11.0

1

10.2

0

13.3

3

12.0

4

4.1

5

0.0

0

6 6

4.7

6 5.5

8

6.3

9

6.4

8

5.8

4

5.5

8

5.9

8

6.1

9

6.1

9

7.0

1

6.1

0

5.6

0 6.8

5

6.4

7

5.4

8

5.8

1

4.6

0

4.9

4

5.0

4

5.7

2

4.1

8

5.9

5 7.2

5

0.0

0

12

6

12

.78

13

.44

8.7

4

10

.42

10

.23

11

.39

10

.19

13

.60

12

.86

12

.31

7.6

7

6.9

6

6.8

3

5.4

0

5.4

5

5.9

7

6.5

6

6.4

4

5.9

7

4.4

8

9.1

5

6.0

9

0.0

0

0

5

10

15

20

25C

O2

Em

mis

sio

n [

To

n C

o2

/mo

nth

]

Emmision [Ton CO2] Offset Emmision by PV [Ton CO2] Net Emmision by GEO Building [Ton CO2]

Emmision [Ton CO2] 18 11 17.53 19.03 15.13 16.90 16.07 16.97 16.17 19.79 19.05 19.32 13.77 12.56 13.67 11.87 10.92 11.78 11.16 11.38 11.01 10.20 13.33 12.04 4.15 0.00

Offset Emmision by PV [Ton CO2] 6 6 4.76 5.58 6.39 6.48 5.84 5.58 5.98 6.19 6.19 7.01 6.10 5.60 6.85 6.47 5.48 5.81 4.60 4.94 5.04 5.72 4.18 5.95 7.25 0.00

Net Emmision by GEO Building [Ton CO2] 12 6 12.78 13.44 8.74 10.42 10.23 11.39 10.19 13.60 12.86 12.31 7.67 6.96 6.83 5.40 5.45 5.97 6.56 6.44 5.97 4.48 9.15 6.09 (3.10)0.00

Ave

rage

Ave

rage

(wit

July

08

Aug

08

Sept

08

Oct

08

Nov

08

Dec

08

Jan

09

Feb

09

Mac

09

Apr

09

May

09

Jun

e 09

July

09

Aug

09

Sept

09

Oct

09

Nov

09

Dec

09

Jan

10

Feb

10

Mac

10

Apr

10

May

10

Jun

e 10

The GEO Building: CO2 Emission

Emits = 140 ton CO2/yr

= 44 kg CO2/m2/yr

NET = 66 ton CO2/yr

= 20 kg CO2/m2/yr

Page 36: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Energy (& CO2) Savings

= 492,125 kWh/yror RM 195,374 per year

Energy saved

= 492,125 x 0.614= 302,165 kg/year CO2= 302 tones CO2/year

CO2 saved

Tariff B (Low Voltage Commercial Tariff) for all kWh

39.7 sen/kWh

0.614 kg of CO2 emitted to the atmosphere for each 1 kWh electricity generated by power plant (Peninsula Malaysia)

GEO BEI = 65

(Conventional) BEI = 220

155 kWh/m2year

Old tariff B ; 40.8 sen/kWh

a/c area 3,175 sq.m

Savings = 70%

Net saving with Renewable Energy = 85%

Potential GreenPASS (Operational

carbon) Rating

Page 37: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

An Example of 37 Storey and Slim Building An Example of 37 Storey and Slim Building

: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS

Energy Saving Strategies To Reduced Building Energy Index [kWh/m2/year]

127

131

142

162

227

237

265

288

294

311

332

382

- 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Use ALC instead of bricks

Fresh air control + Heat wheel

Room temperature 24 degC

Energy Efficient aircond system with BAS, COP 3.8

Energy efficient fans and motors

Energy efficienct office equipment (10W)

Use of daylighting with daylight sensors

EE lighting (11.5W/m2)

Illuminance 300 - 400 Lux and occ.sensors

Use 12mm light green tinted, LT=63%, Shading=0.57)

Reduce WWR from 90 to 60%

Use normal brick wall with 90% wall glazing (6mm clear glass)

11

10

98

76

54

32

1B

as

e

En

erg

y S

av

ing

Str

ate

gie

s

67% reduction

Potential GreenPASS (Operational

carbon) Rating

Page 38: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

A Government School Computer Lab A Government School Computer Lab

: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS

54.8% reduction

Potential GreenPASS (Operational

carbon) Rating

Page 39: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

A Government School Computer Lab A Government School Computer Lab

: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS

Page 40: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

A Government School Computer Lab A Government School Computer Lab

: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS

Page 41: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

RETROFIT BUILDINGRETROFIT BUILDING

EXAMPLES / CASE

Page 42: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Retrofitted Warehouse / Workshop Building with

Enhance Energy Management in Shah Alam

kWh/yr RM/yr

No Cost Measures

De-lamping office lighting 13,476 3,153.38

Low Cost Measures

Use timer controller for temperature and operate silo ventilation 687,760 160,935.84

Use of daylight in warehouse 19,943 4,666.66

Replace normal EXIT signage to LED 2,208 516.67

Awareness campaigns 703,931 164,719.85

High Cost Measures

Replace the Metal Halide lamps to T5HO lamps 957,012 223,940.81

Lighting zoning 498,584 116,668.66

TOTAL 2,882,914 674,602

Measures

Annual Saving

Electrical

Actual Cost Reduction

50%Potential GreenPASS (Operational

carbon) Rating

Page 43: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Guidelines and Code of Practice on Energy Efficiency

& Renewable Energy Building to achieve Low Carbon

Buildings

� Development and Publication of EE in Buildings Guidelinesby Ministry of Energy, Telecommunications & Post, 1989.

� MS1525 : 2001 – Code of Practise Use of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy for Non-residential Buildings(Revised in 2007) by SIRIM.

� Malaysia Industrial Energy Audit Guidelines, a handbook for energy auditors by KTAK, PTM and UNDP-GEF, 2003.

� Guidelines for Conducting Energy Audits in Commercial Buildings by KTAK & PTM, 2004.

� Design Strategies for Energy Efficiency in New Buildings (Non-Domestic) by KTAK, DANIDA & JKR, 2004.

� Energy Efficiency & Conservation Guidelines for Malaysian Industries by KTAK, PTM and UNDP-GEF;- Part 1 : Electrical Energy-use Equipment, 2007.- Part 2 : Thermal Energy-use Equipment (2010)

� Low Carbon Cities Framework & Assessment System (2011) by KeTTHA and GreenTech Malaysia with collaboration with MIP

Page 44: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Green Technology & Green Practises

TECHNOLOGIES CAN BE

CONSIDERED TO REDUCE

CARBON EMISSION

(ENERGY EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY, WATER MANAGEMENT AND

GREEN PRACTICE)

Page 45: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

- Daylighting

- EE lighting + task lights

- EE office equipment (laptops, LCD monitors, networked printers)

- Green IT Network, system & appliances

- Green server room, High temperature server room.

- EE air conditioning & ventilation

- Storage cooling system (minimise chillers capacity)

- Controls & Sensors (VSDs, VAVs, CO2, BMS / Energy monitoring)

- Double glazing (heat and sound insulation)

- Roof and wall Insulation (reduce outside heat gain)

- Grid connected BIPV system (Sell energy to TNB / no batteries)

- Rain water harvest system (landscape, aircond and cleaning)

-Water management, Awareness & Operation & Maintenance

Summary of Features that helps

to reduce carbon

Page 46: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

Water Management

Reduce use of water

• Install efficient water taps to control the amount of water.• Recycle water from basin or surau for watering the landscape.• Recycle condensate water from airconditioning system for general cleaning or landscape.• Rain water harvest System for non-drinking purpose.

Efficient use of water will reduce production of treated

water

���� Reduce operation and distribution of water supply

���� reduce carbon footprint in the operation of buildings

Page 47: 2012 07 Low Carbon Green Building Performance Design

47

Thank you for your attention

SEDA Malaysia,Galeria PjH, Level 9

Jalan P4W, Persiaran Perdana,

Presint 4, 62100 Putrajaya, Malaysia.

Phone : +603-8870 5800Email: [email protected]: www.seda.gov.my

Get copy of paper? - Tel / SMS :[email protected] / [email protected]

Steve Anthony Lojuntin