Upload
setifu-di-sana
View
995
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Low Carbon Green Building system to support the Malaysian Green Performance Assessment System for buildings (GreenPASS) and some government low carbon building projects that I had done.
Citation preview
ENERGY EFFICIENT / LOW CARBON
GREEN BUILDING PERFORMANCE DESIGN
Steve Anthony LojuntinDeputy Director Energy Efficiency Project Team
Sustainable Energy Development Authoritry @ SEDA Malaysia
Tel / SMS :+6019-2829102 Email: [email protected] / [email protected]
Brief about Low Carbon Building
What are the Low Carbon buildings ?
• Low Carbon Building is similar to the
conventional green building system which promotes uses of green technology and green habits to reduce the degradation of the environment.
• Use Carbon as metric for references to achieve the actual environment impact and not based on
points collected.
• Use UNEP SBCI Common
Carbon Metric.
Brief about Low Carbon Building
What are the Low Carbon buildings ?
• Straight forward, transparent, easy to
implement, consistance, easy to monitor since based on actual performance. Measurable,
recordable, comparable, justifiable, can be
monitor and easy to proof.
• Cheaper and affordable since it is straight forward and focus only the relevant criteria that have high impact (lower $$$/CO2 reduction cost).• Global trend- Relevant and gain popularity at international level.
Brief about Low Carbon Green Building
Green / Sustainable / Low
Carbon Buildings
Green Technology
Involved- Energy - Indoor Environment- Water Management- Material used- Site construction-
Green Habits /
Thinking- Awareness / Responsibility- Procurement- Operation & Maintenance- Recycling
General Green Building System
LOW
CARBON
BUILDING
(Malaysia)
1. Energy
2. Water
3. Indoor
environme
nt
4. Waste
Alternative
under
development
� PRIVATE INITIATIVE �
Gov. Initiatives
-CASBuild for
BCIS (GreenTech Malaysia –
consultancy projects)
- GreenPASS(CIDB)
Conventional Green Building System
Carbon Exist in Most of the Green Building Criteria
WHERE DOES THE CARBON COME FROM?
Building
LifecycleUse, Management &
Maintenance
[Operational Energy /
CO2 footprint]
Pre -
Design
Decline,
Demolit
ion /
regenera
tion
Design &
Development
Embodied Energy / CO2
footprint]
FACT! Most of the Energy / CO2e emission are during the operation
phase !!
Carbon emission in a life cycle of a building
Green Technology / application in Buildings to reduce carbon foot print
-The green technology in building is mostly refer to the technology
and applications that has impact to the Energy and Environment
related to building services
a) Design : Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy &
Water Management.
b) Office appliances
c) Operation: Energy management in the O&M.
d) Renovation / retrofits
e) Other - Paper and water recycling
- Indoor air quality.
- Solid waste management / separation
f) End users awareness
Relation between use of energy and the
environment
Kawasan 2007
Semenanjung Malaysia 0.684 kg CO2 / kwj
Sarawak 0.873 kg CO2 / kwj
Kawasan Barat Sabah 0.807 kg CO2 / kwj
Kawasan Timur Sabah 0.709 kg CO2 / kwj
Sumber: Laporan Penanda Aras Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Malaysia
2007 oleh Pusat Tenaga Malaysia.
0.684 kg of CO2 emitted to the atmosphere for each 1 kWh electricity generated by power plant (Peninsula Malaysia)
Examples of Government Low Carbon Building
Understand the factors affecting the energy
consumption in buildings that contribute main
carbon emission
OPERATIONAL CARBON ≡ OPERATIONAL ENERGY
Central A/C
55%
Split A/C
7%
Lighting
18%
Plug
loads/others
20%
Source: Energy Audit in
Government Buildings (2003) by Pusat
Tenaga Malaysia / GreenTech Malaysia
Tenaga
Use of energy in commercial buildings
Example of Energy Used in an Industrial
Building
Energy
Load Profile & Base Load
Typical Daily Load Profile
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
17/0
1/2
008 0
1:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 0
2:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 0
3:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 0
4:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 0
5:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 0
6:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 0
7:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 0
8:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 0
9:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 1
0:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 1
1:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 1
2:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 1
3:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 1
4:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 1
5:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 1
6:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 1
7:1
5
17/0
1/2
008 1
8:0
0
17/0
1/2
008 1
9:0
0
17/0
1/2
008 2
0:0
0
17/0
1/2
008 2
1:0
0
17/0
1/2
008 2
2:0
0
17/0
1/2
008 2
3:0
0
18/0
1/2
008 0
0:0
0
18/0
1/2
008 0
1:0
0
Po
wer
Dem
an
d [k
W]
���� BASE LOAD (24 hrs) ����
���� VARIABLE LOAD ����
A typical Building Load Profile During Working Day
(Extracted from Building Energy Audit Guideline)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
00:00 03:30 07:00 10:30 14:00 17:30 21:00
Time
kW
Total
Air-Con
Light & Power
85 kW
∑=30 kW
Load Profile & Base Load
∑=14 kW
Load Profile & Base Load
Load Profile of a Building
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
11
/01
/20
08
06
:00
11
/01
/20
08
10
:15
11
/01
/20
08
14
:45
11
/01
/20
08
19
:15
11
/01
/20
08
23
:45
12
/01
/20
08
04
:15
12
/01
/20
08
08
:45
12
/01
/20
08
13
:15
12
/01
/20
08
17
:45
12
/01
/20
08
22
:15
13
/01
/20
08
02
:45
13
/01
/20
08
07
:15
13
/01
/20
08
11
:45
13
/01
/20
08
16
:15
13
/01
/20
08
20
:45
14
/01
/20
08
01
:15
14
/01
/20
08
05
:45
14
/01
/20
08
10
:00
14
/01
/20
08
14
:30
14
/01
/20
08
19
:00
14
/01
/20
08
23
:30
15
/01
/20
08
04
:00
15
/01
/20
08
08
:30
15
/01
/20
08
13
:00
15
/01
/20
08
17
:30
15
/01
/20
08
22
:00
16
/01
/20
08
02
:30
16
/01
/20
08
07
:00
16
/01
/20
08
11
:30
16
/01
/20
08
16
:00
16
/01
/20
08
20
:30
17
/01
/20
08
01
:00
17
/01
/20
08
05
:30
17
/01
/20
08
10
:00
17
/01
/20
08
14
:30
17
/01
/20
08
19
:00
17
/01
/20
08
23
:30
Po
we
r D
em
an
d
[kW
]
∑=140 kW
Load Profile & Base Load
∑=7 - 8 kW
Load Profile & Base Load
∑=114 kW
Night Power Consumer ~ 114 kW
Office lighting &
Equipment, 19.1,
16%
Total Split units,
41.8, 33%
Communications
Equipment, 3.7, 3%
Data Center, 8, 7%
UPS losses, 12,
10%
Core Area, 13.7,
11%
Transformer
losses, 7, 6%
Others, 16.6, 14%
Base Load Apportioning
Estimated ACSU Power [W] = 41.806 kWCELCOM
3%
SDF1
5%
SDF2
5%
BMDF
5%
PABX
7%
UPS
24%
SR
2%
BCR
4%
KEBAL
2%
DATA
15%
PID
3%
TELCO
14%
LMR
11%
IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT !IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT !
COMMITMENT FROM THE
USER / CLIENT
NEED STATEMENT ON BUILDING PERFORMANCE AND EE
/ LOW CARBON TARGET BY THE USER – ‘AS POLICY’
DESIGN
PERFORMANCE
ACCORDING TO THE
NEED STATEMENT
OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE ARE
ACCORDING TO THE
NEED STATEMENT
USERS / OCCUPANTS
ROLE / INTERACTION TO
THE BUILDING
PERFORMANCE
EE / LOW CARBON BUILDING PERFORMANCE
INTEGERATED DESIGN APPROACH TO INTEGERATED DESIGN APPROACH TO
GET THE BEST / LOWEST POSSIBLE GET THE BEST / LOWEST POSSIBLE
ENERGY CONSUMPTIONENERGY CONSUMPTION
BRAINSTORM
ARCHITECTSM & E
ENGINEERS
C & S
ENGINEERS
OWNER /
USERS
INTERIOR
DESIGNER
FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT
ICT
CONSULTANT
LANDSCAPE
CONSULTANT
ENERGY / LOW
CARBON / GREEN
CONSULTANT
INTEGERATED DESIGN APPROACH TO INTEGERATED DESIGN APPROACH TO
GET THE BEST / LOWEST POSSIBLE GET THE BEST / LOWEST POSSIBLE
ENERGY CONSUMPTIONENERGY CONSUMPTION
ROOT CAUSED
ANALYSIS
METHOD
WHY? WHAT?
HOW? WHEN?
WHO?
Conduct Energy & Carbon Performance Analysis
Consider Technologies and
Human Factor.
* Use of technology are not the ultimate solution.
CHOOSE THE MOST APPRIOPRATE STRATEGIES
COOLING SYSTEM
LIGHTING SYSTEM
EQUIPMENT USED
Wall Insulation?
Façade
design?
Air tight
building?High COP
sys?
VAV?
VSD?
Low losses
distribution?
Low
resistance air
system?
Efficient cooling
tower?
CAV?
Centralise
system?
Stand alone Split
Unit?
Water cooled sys?
Air cooled sys?
Electrical chiller?Absorption
chiller?
High Eff. Motor?EE Office
appliances?
Green ICT?Shared printers?
Energy
Management
System?
Task Light?
EE Lighting?
Daylighting?Light shelves?
Lighting level?
High efficient
reflector?
Double glazing? Radiant cooling?
LED? Induction light?
Rain water
harvest?
Water efficient
fittings?
SELECTION OF DESIGN STRATEGIESSELECTION OF DESIGN STRATEGIES
- The design and selection of the strategies are depends ultimate design target that required to be achieved !
- Different building will have different design strategies depend on the nature and physical of the building.
- Any irrelevant measures or too expensive could be omitted. Can be justified!
- The best is to put priority strategies that have high performance impact with low or minimum cost to implement (kWh or CO2 reduction / $$$ invested)
NEW BUILDING DESIGNNEW BUILDING DESIGN
EXAMPLES / CASE
KeTTHA’sKeTTHA’s LEO Building LEO Building
: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS
ENERGY- 10 OptimisationEnergy Saving Features in LEO Building
Energy Index kWh/m2year
0 1000 200 300
275Reference Case
247Daylight use
223 EE Lighting 22 - 16 w/m2
195Equipment 27 – 20 w/m2
173EE Light 16 – 8 w/m2
123 EE Equipment 20 - 7.5 w/2
112"Energy Management”
102Room Temp 23 - 24 degrees
100Especially Tight Building
100
239Insulation in walls and roof
EE in Building Guideline Target (136kWh/m2/yr)
56% reduction
Potential GreenPASS (Operational
carbon) Rating
= 3,366,475 kWh/yror more than RM 800,000
per year
= 3,366,475 kWh/yr x 0.614 kg CO2/kwh= 2,067,016 kg/year CO2= 2,067 tones CO2/year
LEO BuildingLEO BEI = 100
(Conventional) BEI = 275
175 kWh/m2year
Tariff C128.8 sen/kWh
Savings = 56%
Average Building Energy Index (BEI) in Parcel B
[kWh/m2/yr]378
315
278
196
233253
322
349
123
321
268
236
167
198215
273296
114
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 E4/5
Blocks
[kW
h/m
2/y
r]
AVERAGE (3276 hrs/yr) AVERAGE (Normalised to 2646hrs/yr)
Comparison LEO Building with several
buildings in Putrajaya
LEO Building Performance
TargetCurrent
Average
LEO Monitoring & PerformanceLEO Monitoring & Performance
114
Monthly Energy Index for LEO Building [kWh/m2/year]
64
38
29
16
38
29 28 27
3330 31 32
29
2426 25
23
29
20
3229
2731
2730
26 25
18
35
2631 30 32
35 3330
2426
29
36
111
9490
7883
8890
87
92
87 88 87
79 8077 78
8077
73
80 81 79 8078
74
81 7976
82
92 90 89 90
95 9489 88
83
100
149
122
106
116112
115 117120
122118
120116
103106
102100
109
97
105109 108 110
107 108
99
106
97
111108
123121 122
124128
124
113 114112
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Desig
n
Oct
04
Nov 0
4
Dec 0
4
Jan 0
5
Feb 0
5
Mac 0
5
April 05
May 0
5
June 0
5
July
05
Aug 0
5
Sept
05
Oct
05
Nov 0
5
Dec 0
5
Jan 0
6
Feb 0
6
Mac 0
6
April 06
May 0
6
June 0
6
July
06
Aug 0
6
Sept
06
Oct
06
Nov 0
6
Dec 0
6
Jan 0
7
Feb 0
7
Mac 0
7
April 07
May 0
7
June 0
7
July
07
Aug 0
7
Sept
07
Oct
07
AV
ER
AG
E
AV
ER
AG
E
En
erg
y I
nd
ex
[k
Wh
/m2/y
ea
r]
Cooling Energy Consumption [kW h] Electrical Energy Consumption [kW h] Building Energy Index [kW h/m2/yr]
Building Energy Index
(Based on Energy Bills)
64
38
29
16
38
29
28
27
33
30 31 32
29
24 26
25
23
29
20
32
29
27 3
1
27 3
0
26
25
18
35
26
31
30 32 35
33
30
24 26 26
24
24 25
25 3
0
30 30 3
4
31
28 3
2
30
-
28
64
36
111
94
90
78
83 8
8 90
87
92
87 88
87
79 80
77 78 80
77
73
80 81
79 80
78
74
81
79
76
82
92
90
89
90
95
94
89
85 8
8 89 9
3
90
87
93
91
89
94
91
90 92
87
-
86
36
100
149
122
106
116
112 115
117
120
122
118
120
116
103
106
102
100 1
09
97
105 109
108
110
107
108
99
106
97
111
108
123
121
122
124 128
124
113
110 114
113 116
116
113
122
120
119 1
28
122
118 1
24
118
100
115
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Month
[kW
h/m
2/y
r]
Chilled Water-Cooling Index [kWh/m2/yr] Electrical Energy Index [kWh/m2/yr] Building Energy Index [kWh/m2/yr]
- Daylighting (almost 100%)
- EE lighting + task lights
- EE office equipment (laptops, LCD monitors, networked printers)
- Green IT Network & server room (75% wireless network)
- EE air conditioning & ventilation
- Floor slab cooling (For radiant cooling and thermal storage)
- PCM storage cooling system (minimised air-cond chillers capacity)
- Controls & Sensors (VSDs, VAVs, CO2, BMS / Energy monitoring)
- Double glazing (heat and sound insulation)
- Roof and wall Insulation (reduce outside heat gain)
- Grid connected BIPV system (Sell energy to TNB / no batteries)
- Rain water harvest system (landscape, aircond and cleaning)
GreenTech Malaysia’s GEO Building GreenTech Malaysia’s GEO Building
: DESIGN ELEMENTS: DESIGN ELEMENTS
MONTHLY GEO BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE
8,8
24
8,3
68
6,9
93
8,2
13
9,3
94
9,5
23
8,5
86
8,2
05
8,7
96
9,1
09
9,1
05
10
,31
2
8,9
68
8,2
34
10
,06
7
9,5
11
8,0
52
8,5
39
6,7
62
7,2
68
7,4
19
8,4
07
6,1
48 8,7
44
10
,66
0
0
25
,87
6
16
,72
4
25
,78
4
27
,98
1
22
,25
1
24
,85
1
23
,63
5
24
,95
4
23
,77
7
29
,10
2
28
,01
2
28
,41
7
20
,24
4
18
,46
6
20
,11
0
17
,45
6
16
,06
6
17
,32
3
16
,41
0
16
,73
7
16
,19
8
14
,99
5 19
,60
0
17
,70
0
6,1
02
0
97.9
63.0
96
110
90 92 91 9388
111104105
7569
7565 62 64 63 62 60 62
7368
23
0
33 32 3036 35 33 30 33
37 3440
33 3237 35
31 3226 27 28
35
2334
40
00
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
En
erg
y C
on
su
me
d / E
ne
rgy
Ge
ne
rate
d [
kW
h/m
on
th]
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
BE
I [
kW
h/m
2/y
ea
r]
kWh PV kWh Total BEI [kWh/m2/yr] BEI PV Linear (BEI [kWh/m2/yr] )
kWh PV 8,824 8,368 6,993 8,213 9,394 9,523 8,586 8,205 8,796 9,109 9,105 10,312 8,968 8,234 10,067 9,511 8,052 8,539 6,762 7,268 7,419 8,407 6,148 8,744 10,660 0
kWh Total 25,876 16,724 25,784 27,981 22,251 24,851 23,635 24,954 23,777 29,102 28,012 28,417 20,244 18,466 20,110 17,456 16,066 17,323 16,410 16,737 16,198 14,995 19,600 17,700 6,102 0
Num of Days 13 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 2 0
BEI [kWh/m2/yr] 97.9 63.0 96 110 90 92 91 93 88 111 104 105 75 69 75 65 62 64 63 62 60 62 73 68 23 0
BEI PV 33 32 30 36 35 33 30 33 37 34 40 33 32 37 35 31 32 26 27 28 35 23 34 40 0
Avera
ge
Avera
ge
(with
July
08
Aug
08
Sept
08Oct 08
Nov
08Dec 08 Jan 09 Feb 09
Mac
09Apr 09
May
09
June
09
July
09
Aug
09
Sept
09Oct 09
Nov
09Dec 09 Jan 10 Feb 10
Mac
10Apr 10
May
10
June
10
Monitored GEO Building Energy
Index
MONTHLY GEO BUILDING CO2 EMMISSION PERFORMANCE
18
11
17.5
3 19.0
3
15.1
3 16.9
0
16.0
7
16.9
7
16.1
7
19.7
9
19.0
5
19.3
2
13.7
7
12.5
6
13.6
7
11.8
7
10.9
2
11.7
8
11.1
6
11.3
8
11.0
1
10.2
0
13.3
3
12.0
4
4.1
5
0.0
0
6 6
4.7
6 5.5
8
6.3
9
6.4
8
5.8
4
5.5
8
5.9
8
6.1
9
6.1
9
7.0
1
6.1
0
5.6
0 6.8
5
6.4
7
5.4
8
5.8
1
4.6
0
4.9
4
5.0
4
5.7
2
4.1
8
5.9
5 7.2
5
0.0
0
12
6
12
.78
13
.44
8.7
4
10
.42
10
.23
11
.39
10
.19
13
.60
12
.86
12
.31
7.6
7
6.9
6
6.8
3
5.4
0
5.4
5
5.9
7
6.5
6
6.4
4
5.9
7
4.4
8
9.1
5
6.0
9
0.0
0
0
5
10
15
20
25C
O2
Em
mis
sio
n [
To
n C
o2
/mo
nth
]
Emmision [Ton CO2] Offset Emmision by PV [Ton CO2] Net Emmision by GEO Building [Ton CO2]
Emmision [Ton CO2] 18 11 17.53 19.03 15.13 16.90 16.07 16.97 16.17 19.79 19.05 19.32 13.77 12.56 13.67 11.87 10.92 11.78 11.16 11.38 11.01 10.20 13.33 12.04 4.15 0.00
Offset Emmision by PV [Ton CO2] 6 6 4.76 5.58 6.39 6.48 5.84 5.58 5.98 6.19 6.19 7.01 6.10 5.60 6.85 6.47 5.48 5.81 4.60 4.94 5.04 5.72 4.18 5.95 7.25 0.00
Net Emmision by GEO Building [Ton CO2] 12 6 12.78 13.44 8.74 10.42 10.23 11.39 10.19 13.60 12.86 12.31 7.67 6.96 6.83 5.40 5.45 5.97 6.56 6.44 5.97 4.48 9.15 6.09 (3.10)0.00
Ave
rage
Ave
rage
(wit
July
08
Aug
08
Sept
08
Oct
08
Nov
08
Dec
08
Jan
09
Feb
09
Mac
09
Apr
09
May
09
Jun
e 09
July
09
Aug
09
Sept
09
Oct
09
Nov
09
Dec
09
Jan
10
Feb
10
Mac
10
Apr
10
May
10
Jun
e 10
The GEO Building: CO2 Emission
Emits = 140 ton CO2/yr
= 44 kg CO2/m2/yr
NET = 66 ton CO2/yr
= 20 kg CO2/m2/yr
Energy (& CO2) Savings
= 492,125 kWh/yror RM 195,374 per year
Energy saved
= 492,125 x 0.614= 302,165 kg/year CO2= 302 tones CO2/year
CO2 saved
Tariff B (Low Voltage Commercial Tariff) for all kWh
39.7 sen/kWh
0.614 kg of CO2 emitted to the atmosphere for each 1 kWh electricity generated by power plant (Peninsula Malaysia)
GEO BEI = 65
(Conventional) BEI = 220
155 kWh/m2year
Old tariff B ; 40.8 sen/kWh
a/c area 3,175 sq.m
Savings = 70%
Net saving with Renewable Energy = 85%
Potential GreenPASS (Operational
carbon) Rating
An Example of 37 Storey and Slim Building An Example of 37 Storey and Slim Building
: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS
Energy Saving Strategies To Reduced Building Energy Index [kWh/m2/year]
127
131
142
162
227
237
265
288
294
311
332
382
- 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Use ALC instead of bricks
Fresh air control + Heat wheel
Room temperature 24 degC
Energy Efficient aircond system with BAS, COP 3.8
Energy efficient fans and motors
Energy efficienct office equipment (10W)
Use of daylighting with daylight sensors
EE lighting (11.5W/m2)
Illuminance 300 - 400 Lux and occ.sensors
Use 12mm light green tinted, LT=63%, Shading=0.57)
Reduce WWR from 90 to 60%
Use normal brick wall with 90% wall glazing (6mm clear glass)
11
10
98
76
54
32
1B
as
e
En
erg
y S
av
ing
Str
ate
gie
s
67% reduction
Potential GreenPASS (Operational
carbon) Rating
A Government School Computer Lab A Government School Computer Lab
: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS
54.8% reduction
Potential GreenPASS (Operational
carbon) Rating
A Government School Computer Lab A Government School Computer Lab
: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS
A Government School Computer Lab A Government School Computer Lab
: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS: ENERGY DESIGN ELEMENTS
RETROFIT BUILDINGRETROFIT BUILDING
EXAMPLES / CASE
Retrofitted Warehouse / Workshop Building with
Enhance Energy Management in Shah Alam
kWh/yr RM/yr
No Cost Measures
De-lamping office lighting 13,476 3,153.38
Low Cost Measures
Use timer controller for temperature and operate silo ventilation 687,760 160,935.84
Use of daylight in warehouse 19,943 4,666.66
Replace normal EXIT signage to LED 2,208 516.67
Awareness campaigns 703,931 164,719.85
High Cost Measures
Replace the Metal Halide lamps to T5HO lamps 957,012 223,940.81
Lighting zoning 498,584 116,668.66
TOTAL 2,882,914 674,602
Measures
Annual Saving
Electrical
Actual Cost Reduction
50%Potential GreenPASS (Operational
carbon) Rating
Guidelines and Code of Practice on Energy Efficiency
& Renewable Energy Building to achieve Low Carbon
Buildings
� Development and Publication of EE in Buildings Guidelinesby Ministry of Energy, Telecommunications & Post, 1989.
� MS1525 : 2001 – Code of Practise Use of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy for Non-residential Buildings(Revised in 2007) by SIRIM.
� Malaysia Industrial Energy Audit Guidelines, a handbook for energy auditors by KTAK, PTM and UNDP-GEF, 2003.
� Guidelines for Conducting Energy Audits in Commercial Buildings by KTAK & PTM, 2004.
� Design Strategies for Energy Efficiency in New Buildings (Non-Domestic) by KTAK, DANIDA & JKR, 2004.
� Energy Efficiency & Conservation Guidelines for Malaysian Industries by KTAK, PTM and UNDP-GEF;- Part 1 : Electrical Energy-use Equipment, 2007.- Part 2 : Thermal Energy-use Equipment (2010)
� Low Carbon Cities Framework & Assessment System (2011) by KeTTHA and GreenTech Malaysia with collaboration with MIP
Green Technology & Green Practises
TECHNOLOGIES CAN BE
CONSIDERED TO REDUCE
CARBON EMISSION
(ENERGY EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY, WATER MANAGEMENT AND
GREEN PRACTICE)
- Daylighting
- EE lighting + task lights
- EE office equipment (laptops, LCD monitors, networked printers)
- Green IT Network, system & appliances
- Green server room, High temperature server room.
- EE air conditioning & ventilation
- Storage cooling system (minimise chillers capacity)
- Controls & Sensors (VSDs, VAVs, CO2, BMS / Energy monitoring)
- Double glazing (heat and sound insulation)
- Roof and wall Insulation (reduce outside heat gain)
- Grid connected BIPV system (Sell energy to TNB / no batteries)
- Rain water harvest system (landscape, aircond and cleaning)
-Water management, Awareness & Operation & Maintenance
Summary of Features that helps
to reduce carbon
Water Management
Reduce use of water
• Install efficient water taps to control the amount of water.• Recycle water from basin or surau for watering the landscape.• Recycle condensate water from airconditioning system for general cleaning or landscape.• Rain water harvest System for non-drinking purpose.
Efficient use of water will reduce production of treated
water
���� Reduce operation and distribution of water supply
���� reduce carbon footprint in the operation of buildings
47
Thank you for your attention
SEDA Malaysia,Galeria PjH, Level 9
Jalan P4W, Persiaran Perdana,
Presint 4, 62100 Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Phone : +603-8870 5800Email: [email protected]: www.seda.gov.my
Get copy of paper? - Tel / SMS :[email protected] / [email protected]
Steve Anthony Lojuntin