15
2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

2014 TCTW State Leaders’ ForumOklahoma City, Oklahoma

January 29, 2014

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

SREB

Page 2: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

Seventy-four percent of teachers with five or fewer years entered through an alternative route

Move immediately into the classroom with no prior preparation

Need greater assistance with planning, delivering, managing, and assessing engaging instruction

Increasing percentage of teachers entering through nontraditional routes

Widely varying requirements in alternative routes

Unique needs of alternatively certified CTE teachers

Challenges of the new mission—students college and career ready

SREB Data on CTE Teachers Literature Review

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 3: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

NRCCTE

Supported under the National Research Center for Career and Technical Education, PR/Award (No. VO51A070003) as administered by the Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education.

Content does not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Office of Vocational and Adult Education or the U.S. Department of Education and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 4: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

NRCCTE

Develop an induction model for new CTE teachers pursuing alternative route certification

Increase competence, self-efficacy, and career commitment

Prepare the intervention for experimental trials

SREB

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 5: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

NRCCTE

• Content responsive to the needs of CTE teachers

• Sequence and duration of the professional development sessions

• Quality of instruction

• Regular, structured interaction with trained on-site mentor and administrator

• On-site observations and feedback from professional development instructor

• Regular interaction with a community of practice

• Instructional competence

• Confidence to impact student learning

• Career commitment to teaching

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 6: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

On-site coaching visits from the professional development instructor

Mentoring from a trained, experienced teacher

Support from the building administrator

Electronic communities of practice

Professional Development School-Based Support

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 7: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

NRCCTE

Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium Model Standards for Beginning Teachers

Framework for Teaching National Board for

Professional Teaching Standards for Career/Technical Teachers

NRCCTE research and SREB surveys

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 8: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

Teacher Reflection: Reflect, both individually and collaboratively, on the effects of instruction and use the reflective process to continually improve instructional practice.

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 9: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

NRCCTE

Guides for Instructors and Participants

Sequence of Delivery

Delivery Methods

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 10: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

NRCCTE

Mentoring Administrator and

school system support Coaching Communities of

practice

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 11: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 12: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

Seven Essential Teaching Skills

Planning Standards-Based Instruction

Designing Standards-Based Assessments

Facilitating Project-Based Learning

Using Cooperative Learning

Embedding Literacy Embedding Numeracy Managing the Classroom

Delivery Makes a Difference!

Workshop format that models strategies

Content-area specific examples

Substantive dialogue with peers

Practice through teach-backs

Coaching during individual and small group work

Feedback and facilitated reflection

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 13: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

Quality of Professional Development

Quality of Support Implementation and Delivery

• “Just-in-time,” practical information is superior to traditional delivery of college course sequence.

• “Learning struggle” is important and necessary.

• Teachers are prepared to contribute to school improvement efforts.

• Continuous learning experiences established a sense of community and fostered application.

• Summer institute following provided a culminating experience.

• Specialized training and materials for administrators and mentors support “speaking the same language.”

• Sustained, structured support should be connected to professional development.

• Teachers who had regular contact with mentors and administrators felt a greater sense of support.

• Coaching provided important feedback.

• Coordination is needed among all stakeholders.

• Program delivery needs to be intense and accelerated (15 mos. vs. 5 years).

• The selection of first-year teachers is essential. This is not a “fix it” program.

• Traditional teacher educators need to shift style of delivery and view of content organization to implement this model.

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 14: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

NRCCTE

Fidelity to structure of model—professional development and support

Facilitated planning with stakeholders

Selection and training of instructors

Selection of participants—identify in time for 2-week workshop

Training and commitment of local administrators and mentors

Incentives (course credit and/or paid work time) for professional development

Commitment to on-going evaluation of the effects of the model

CTE Teacher Preparation Project

Page 15: 2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB

NRCCTE

For Further Information:Nancy Headrick

[email protected]

CTE Teacher Preparation Project