Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Part of the M&G Group
M&G Real Estate: Asia Pacific Outlook
Dec
embe
r 201
6
3
The economic outlook for major Asia-Pacific markets
remains relatively healthy, with overall regional growth
estimates for 2017 upgraded slightly to 4.6% in the third
quarter. This was led by improved forecasts in Australasia
and India, which helped to widen the region’s expected
outperformance over North America (2.2%) and the euro
zone (1.3%). However, with the surprise victory of Donald
Trump in the US presidential elections in November, there
is now some potential for a stronger US domestic economy
at the expense of global trade.
Uncertainty over US trade policies could lead to a
re-assessment of regional performance but the actual
impact could be drawn out, so there are strong grounds
to remain optimistic, not least because of growing intra-
regional trade.
Executive summary• Asia-Pacific economic outlook healthy in
near-term, but policy uncertainty globally
poses risks.
• Regional property total returns look set to
taper as yield compression slows with lower
transaction volumes.
• Development, alternatives, and tactical
opportunities could drive next wave of
investments.
250%Ratio to GDP of China’s non-financial debt
15%+ Expected rise in Sydney effective office rents in 2016
6.5% Average annual APAC property returns expected
in next 3 years
China looks set to report GDP growth of 6.7% for 2016,
with a slight increase in commodity demand helping to
soothe nagging worries over a possible economic hard
landing. Fears of stock market and housing bubbles in
China continue to rank among the biggest risks to the
Asia-Pacific economy because of the financial system’s
escalating debt levels. Non-financial debt in China has
risen to more than 250% of GDP from 150% in 2008
and smaller Chinese banks have extremely high loan-
to-deposit ratios that put them at risk if non-performing
loans increase. Much of China’s positive economic
outlook, and perhaps the world’s, rests on the belief that
the Chinese government has the financial strength to
support any crisis.
In addition to domestic issues, recent political and
economic relations between the US and China appear
to have worsened and any negative ramifications could
potentially affect the global economy.
“Fears of stock market and housing
bubbles in China continue to rank among
the biggest risks...”
In Japan, unprecedented efforts to lift the world’s third-
largest economy out of a 20-year deflationary spiral
appear to have hit a wall. “Yield Curve Control” was
unveiled as the central bank’s latest policy to boost public
confidence and inflation. The policy aims to manage the
yield curve by keeping 10-year yields at zero and out of
negative territory.
Thus far, the loose monetary regime set by ‘Abenomics’
has supported investment assets well but, as yet, it has not
strengthened the real economy significantly, with private
capital investment and consumption spending growth
Near-term economic outlook remains healthy
Fig 1: APAC still comfortably ahead
Source: Consensus Economics.
US Euro zone APAC
GD
P g
row
th (
%)
2015 2016F 2017F
0
6
1
2
3
4
5
4
The near-term economic outlook for the Asia-Pacific region
is likely to remain uncertain following this year’s surprise
UK vote to leave the European Union as well as the
unexpected US election result. A Trump administration
could potentially be positive for the domestic US economy
but global trade now appears to be more at risk as potential
changes to trade agreements could hurt Asian exports.
More uncertainty lies ahead in 2017 with much of mainland
Europe going to the polls and Asian geopolitical tensions
on the rise. However, we remain optimistic in the long-run
and expect the Asia-Pacific region’s consumption outlook –
with the middle classes expanding rapidly in China, India,
and Southeast Asia – to continue to underpin economic
growth for the foreseeable future.
“...we remain optimistic in the long-run
and expect the Asia-Pacific region’s
consumption outlook – with the middle
classes expanding rapidly in China, India,
and Southeast Asia – to continue to underpin
economic growth for the foreseeable future.”
By country, the property market outlook remains as
divergent as their respective economic stories, with the
only common themes being strong Chinese tourism growth
and persistently low property yields. In broad terms, the
pace of yield compression seems to have tapered off as
investors become wary of the demanding valuations and
toppish rental cycles. This is perhaps best illustrated by
the continued decline in transaction volumes, which have
Divergent markets – stock withdrawals and rental rebounds the key drivers
still slow. The Japanese government’s 2% inflation goal
remains elusive with consumer sentiment and business
conditions still weak. Major retailers are also still choosing
to hold or even lower prices to draw out consumers’ wallets.
Elsewhere, economic situations across individual markets
continue to diverge. In Australia, Sydney and Melbourne
are growing strongly on the back of record-low interest
rates and a housing boom. Infrastructure construction and
residential redevelopment in the Sydney and Melbourne
central business districts is driving real output growth,
along with related business and professional services
such as legal and real estate, etc. Consumer sentiment
has received a huge boost from the ongoing surge in
residential prices, up over 30% since 2013.
Meanwhile in Brisbane, and particularly Perth, economic
conditions remain soft, despite improving commodity
prices. Even as commodity demand picks up, incremental
investment from this sector appears unlikely. With some
firms still facing financial difficulties, bad loan risks are still
high, so Australian bank and sovereign credit ratings face
potential downgrades.
South Korea has also seen a gradual pick-up in growth,
driven by low interest rates and the government’s fiscal
efforts, including the latest KRW10trillion (US$8.5 billion)
stimulus package. But doubts remain over the Korean
recovery’s sustainability, given fluctuating industrial and
manufacturing output reports over the course of 2016.
Labour strike issues and the impeachment of the country’s
president have further clouded Korea’s economic outlook.
Two of Asia’s key global cities Singapore and Hong Kong
continue to face strong headwinds as they struggle
through their respective structural problems.
Singapore’s government GDP guidance fell further to the
lower end of the 1-2% official estimate after economic
data for the third quarter showed some weakness in the
manufacturing and industrial sectors. Recent defaults by
oil and gas service companies and persistent weakness
in the shipping industry have played a part in keeping
consumer sentiment muted. 2017 growth forecasts
also look soft. The government’s drive to attract higher-
value manufacturing and technology companies to help
offset weakness in the ailing financial sector faces strong
competition globally.
Slower Chinese growth plus growing competition from
mainland Chinese hubs Shanghai and Shenzhen are part
of the structural shift that Hong Kong faces. Political
uncertainty also appears to be rising again, two years
after mass pro-democracy protests erupted. Pro-Beijing
and pro-democracy camps are raising the stakes ahead of
elections in March for the Special Administrative Region’s
chief executive. The uncertainty over China’s reaction has
kept some business decisions on the side lines.
Source: Bloomberg.
Australia
South Korea US
SingaporeHong Kong Japan
10
-ye
ar
go
vern
me
nt
bo
nd
yie
lds
(%)
-1
8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Q4
– 2
00
0
Q4
– 2
01
5
Q3
– 2
01
6
Q4
– 2
01
4
Q4
– 2
01
3
Q4
– 2
01
2
Q4
– 2
01
1
Q4
– 2
01
0
Q4
– 2
00
9
Q4
– 2
00
8
Q4
– 2
00
7
Q4
– 2
00
6
Q4
– 2
00
5
Q4
– 2
00
4
Q4
– 2
00
3
Q4
– 2
00
2
Q4
– 2
00
1
Fig 2: Property’s relative yield appeal
5
peak of the cycle with the looming supply pipeline likely to
enter the market from 2018-19. On the retail front, inbound
Chinese tourist arrival figures continue to rise at a heady
pace, though average tourist spend has declined. With
visitors spending less on luxury retail, prime retail rents
will continue to benefit from Japan’s tourism drive but are
unlikely to enjoy the huge increases seen in recent years.
Logistics-driven industrial demand remains strong,
particularly in Tokyo Bay, where vacancy remains low.
Outside of the prime industrial areas there is evidence that
the rate of absorption has slowed, although vacancy rates
remain low. Relatively stable returns in Japan’s industrial
and residential sectors are also helping to underpin
investment interest.
“Logistics-driven industrial demand
remains strong, particularly in Tokyo Bay,
where vacancy remains low.”
The office sector in Seoul continues to see high incentive
levels as the supply pipeline comes on-stream. With
domestic demand making up the majority of absorption,
the uncertainty in the Korean economic outlook is
likely to have an impact on expansion plans and rental
growth. Similar to Tokyo, the retail sector in Seoul has
been a beneficiary of Chinese tourism. Prime retail in
Myeongdong district has seen stable rental increases due
to its concentration of more-affordable cosmetics and
fashion retail shops, instead of luxury boutiques.
Hong Kong’s traditional gateway-to-China role for
international firms could potentially be compromised as
Tier-1 cities in China continue to develop rapidly. The
incremental demand needed to absorb the large supply
pipeline in Kowloon East also seems unlikely to come
through, as financial firms downsize. Still, office demand
in Hong Kong Central remains resilient as firms continue to
been slowing since the second quarter of 2015. The decline
would have been even more pronounced in the absence of
major acquisitions by sovereign, national insurance, and
pension funds.
As highlighted previously, the combination of population
growth, monetary stimulus, and foreign investments has
led to a surge in residential prices in Sydney and Melbourne.
Positive consumer sentiment, along with continued tourism
demand, have been supportive of retail sales and rents,
while the redevelopment of the CBD has brought about
significant stock withdrawals in the office market. These
withdrawals are the key driver of strong rental increases
given fairly flat net absorption demand levels. Sydney
office rents are expected to rise in excess of 15% in 2016,
particularly in the secondary office market where most
of the withdrawals are taking place. While office rental
incentives in Sydney are falling sharply, albeit from a high
base, in Melbourne they remain sticky due to the potential
pipeline of new supply in the Docklands area.
“We expect prime Australian real estate to
be one of the few developed sectors in
Asia-Pacific to still see some yield
compression over the next five years.”
At the other end of the spectrum, Brisbane and Perth
continue to see limited occupier demand and negative
net absorption. With vacancy rates at multi-year highs
and the rental gap with Sydney widening, investors are
increasingly looking towards these markets, particularly
Brisbane, as potential contrarian investments. We expect
prime Australian real estate to be one of the few developed
sectors in Asia-Pacific to still see some yield compression
over the next five years.
Office rental growth remained strong in Tokyo, driven by
low vacancy rates and fairly strong leasing activity. While
this growth is likely to continue in the next three years, we
expect rent increases to slow from here as we approach the
Source: PMA.
Australia SingaporeJapan (Tokyo) Hong Kong
0
200
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F
Fig 3: Residential price index (2010=100)
Fig 4: Growth of Chinese tourists (YOY, %)
Source: Various tourism boards.
-40
120
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Singapore Hong Kong Japan Australia Korea
2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD2016
6
value being in Hong Kong’s premier office location, despite
the significantly lower asking rents across the water in the
new business district.
The decline in mainland Chinese luxury spending continues
to impact retail sales and the sharp correction in prime
retail rents, once the highest in the world, is expected to
be protracted.
In Singapore, pre-leasing for upcoming major office
completions has picked up at the expense of asking
rents. Older stock within the business district is likely to
be impacted the most as landlords continue to see flight-
to-quality as tenants take advantage of the soft rental
market, which could see declines extend into 2017. The
outlook for prime retail in Singapore remains similarly
uninspiring, suffering from lower average tourist spend and
competition from convenient, high-quality suburban malls.
We expect property yields to see some expansion in both
Singapore and Hong Kong over the next five years.
Top 3 for rental growth
2017 – 2019 2020 – 2021
Sydney office Perth office
Sydney secondary office Singapore office
Melbourne office Hong Kong retail
Source: M&G Real Estate.
Asia-Pacific real estate is on track to deliver some of the
highest total returns globally, averaging almost 11% in
2016, supported by continued monetary stimulus and
stronger economic expansion. Returns in recent years
have been driven by very sharp yield compression, which
we believe will now slow. With investors becoming more
cautious, we expect returns to taper to more sustainable
levels of 8% in 2017 and to average 6.5% p.a. over the next
three years. With interest rates in the region expected to
remain low over this period, these returns will still provide a
comfortable spread over bond yields.
“With investors becoming more cautious,
we expect returns to taper to more sustainable
levels of 8% in 2017 and to average 6.5% p.a.
over the next three years.”
A closer look at some regional markets reveals that high
office returns often mask significant incentives, particularly
in Australia and Korea. In comparison, we expect the
retail sector to provide stronger and less volatile effective
returns, ranging from 50 to 200 basis points above office
sector returns.
Weak near-term fundamentals in the Singapore and Hong
Kong office sectors, coupled with stubbornly high pricing,
are key reasons why M&G Real Estate has selectively
focused on other sectors elsewhere in the region – such as
retail property in Australia and Korea, which offers higher
returns, and Japan’s residential and logistics sectors, where
the returns are less volatile.
As some of these structural trading opportunities become
increasingly crowded and the low-hanging fruit largely
gets picked, we believe that new tactical opportunities
in currently-weak markets could drive the next wave of
transactions.
With global capital still on the lookout for diversified
real estate returns, low interest rates and pockets of
fundamental property strength are likely to keep both
prime and secondary property yields in Asia down in the
near-term. Faced with declining prospective returns and
limited availability of assets, investors are increasingly
looking outside of traditional core sectors. By carefully
balancing the risks and potential returns, we believe there
is scope for investors to continue to be rewarded in the
region. Development projects, for example, could provide
investors with exposure to closely-held sectors that are
historically difficult to access. Sourcing for deals in second-
tier cities with stable domestic fundamentals could be
another avenue for rewarding risk-adjusted returns.
“Sourcing for deals in second-tier
cities with stable domestic fundamentals
could be another avenue for rewarding
risk-adjusted returns.”Source: PMA.
Tokyo Osaka Singapore Seoul
Sydney Hong KongPerthMelbourne Brisbane
0
25
5
10
15
20
Q2
– 2
00
1
Q2
– 2
01
5
Q2
– 2
01
6
Q2
– 2
01
4
Q2
– 2
01
3
Q2
– 2
01
2
Q2
– 2
01
1
Q2
– 2
01
0
Q2
– 2
00
9
Q2
– 2
00
8
Q2
– 2
00
7
Q2
– 2
00
6
Q2
– 2
00
5
Q2
– 2
00
4
Q2
– 2
00
3
Q2
– 2
00
2
Off
ice
va
can
cy
ra
tes
(% s
tock
)
Fig 2: Mixed picture
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Not for further distribution. The value of investments can fall as well as rise. This article reflects M&G Real Estate’s present opinions reflecting current market conditions. They are subject to change without notice and involve a number of assumptions which may not prove valid. The distribution of this article does not constitute an offer or solicitation. It has been written for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or as a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. The services and products provided by M&G Investment Management Limited are available only to investors who come within the category of Professional Client as defined in the Handbook published by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. Information given in this document has been obtained from, or based upon, sources believed by us to be reliable and accurate although M&G Real Estate does not accept liability for the accuracy of the contents.
Notice to recipients in Australia: M&G Investment Management Limited does not hold an Australian financial services licence and is exempt from the requirement to hold one for the financial services it provides. M&G Investment Management Limited is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under the laws of the UK which differ from Australian laws.
Notice to recipients in Hong Kong: The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in Hong Kong. If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this document, you should obtain independent professional advice.
Notice to recipients in Singapore: This document has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this document and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor may shares be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor pursuant to Section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the “SFA”) or (ii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.
M&G Investments and M&G Real Estate are business names of M&G Investment Management Limited and are used by other companies within the Prudential Group. M&G Investment Management Limited is registered in England and Wales under numbers 936683 with its registered office at Laurence Pountney Hill, London EC4R 0HH. M&G Investment Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. M&G Real Estate Limited is registered in England and Wales under number 3852763 with its registered office at Laurence Pountney Hill, London EC4R 0HH. M&G Real Estate Limited forms part of the M&G Group of companies. M&G Investment Management Limited and M&G Real Estate Limited are indirect subsidiaries of Prudential plc of the United Kingdom. Prudential plc and its affiliated companies constitute one of the world’s leading financial services groups and is not affiliated in any manner with Prudential Financial, Inc, a company whose principal place of business is in the United States of America. DEC 16 / 174801
Yip Kai Research Analyst
+65 6349 9000
Lucy Williams Director, Institutional Business UK and Europe, Real Estate
+44 (0)20 7548 6585
Christopher Andrews, CFA Head of Client Relationships and Marketing, Real Estate
+65 6436 5331
Richard Gwilliam Head of Property Research
+44 (0)20 7548 6863
Stefan Cornelissen Director of Institutional Business Benelux, Nordics and Switzerland
+31 (0)20 799 7680
www.mandg.com/realestate
For more information