36
Struktur vor Inhalt Wie organisieren wir komplexe Requirements? Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim Includes additional notes & comments

20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Struktur vor InhaltWie organisieren wir komplexe Requirements?

Handout-Version

Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management

1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Includes additional notes & comments

Page 2: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Consultant & TrainerHow software development & IT contribute to business successTool-based requirements management

Author & SpeakerInternational journals & conferencesBlog MakingOfSoftware.com

Professional CommunitiesACM, IEEE, GI, ASQF – Active MemberVivit TQA – Founder & Co-Leader

Dr. Andreas BirkFounder & Principal ConsultantSoftware.Process.Management

[email protected], LinkedIn, Google+

1 March 2016 2Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 3: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Consulting houseBased in Stuttgart, GermanyNetwork of senior software engineering experts

We help organizations to optimally align their software processes with their business goals

Requirements Management, Agile Development, Variants & Reuse, Software Product Management

Software.Process.Management

www.swpm.de

software processes that fit your business needs

1 March 2016 3Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 4: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

4

Structure Precedes Content

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 5: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Structure without Content

51 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 6: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Contents without Structure

61 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 7: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Simple Tasks Don’t Need Much Structure

71 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 8: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Complex Tasks REQUIRE Structure

81 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 9: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

9

RM is Inherently Complex

RM REQUIRES Structure

Effective requirements management (RM) needs suitable information structures that match the given software or system development goals, context, and purpose.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 10: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

10

What Structure?

What Structures?

A good requirements management solution must address requirements structure on several different levels and dimensions. For instance, there shall be structural templates for individual requirements documents and a structural framework for organizing requirements documents into folders or within a document management platform.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 11: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

11

What Complexity?

What Complexities?

Find out what particular complexities RM must deal with in a given environment (e.g., number of requirements, number of different sites involved, longevity of information).Design requirements structures so that they can deal with these complexities.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 12: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

12

What Is Complexityin RM?

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 13: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Complexity in RM

13

Number of Requirements

Degree of Requirements Conflicts

Fuzziness of Solution

Technical Content

Longevity of Information

Number of Stakeholders

Number of Sites

Innovation & Novelty

etc. etc.

etc.

etc.

etc. Number of Product Variants

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 14: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

14

Patterns of Requirements Structure

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 15: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Structure Depends – Patterns Help …

RM Structure is complex

Structure must be adapted to goals and context

Patterns of requirements structure provide viable solution elements

15

Structure depends and must be adapted to situation, context, and purpose.Structural patterns document experience about viable elements of requirements structure.Patterns serve as starting points and building blocks for developing suitable comprehensive requirements management solutions.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 16: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Structural Levels

16

IT Domain / Site

Tool Instance

RM Project

Requirements Section

Requirements Cluster

Item Type

Item Entity

Item Attribute

Statement

Sentence

Term

Stru

ctur

al L

evel

s

Example:

ID Title Description Priority Release ...... The system shall ... medium 1.4 ...

...

...

The system should notify a user in case …

A pattern of requirements structure relates to a specific structural level

must

Requirements structure has many facets.It is useful to distinguish different levels of requirements structure. This slide shows an example for textual requirements statements.Other requirements formats need adapted structural levels (e.g., model-based requirements definitions or use case specifications).

This example shows that a requirements pattern must be related to a specific structural level.Both patterns address requirements priority.

Defining priority through keywords like “must” and “should” on the level of requirements statements has severe disadvantages. It shall best be expressed through attributes on the item type level.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 17: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Structure Depends

17

Requirements structure depends in particular on …

Type of RM Change-Request RMProject-oriented RMContinuous product RMPlan-based vs. Agile

Organizational Level IndividualTeamOrganization

Development Phase Elicitation, Documentation, …RM Interfaces to Architecture, Implementation, Testing, …

There is not one best requirements structure.Rather, structure depends on aspects like what is the type of requirements management?, on what organizational level are requirements defined?, and in which development phase are the requirements used?

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 18: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Change Request (IREB)C

hang

eIn

form

atio

n

Identifier: CR-2016-0007Title: ICAO Code SearchDescription: Add a field for ICAO codes to the „Search Airport“ dialog.Justification: Some travel documents refer only to ICAO codes.Date Filed: 28-Jan-2016Applicant: Peter SmithPriority (Applicant): Medium

Man

agem

ent

Info

rmat

ion

Change Validator: Ann MillerImpact Analysis Status: OpenCCB Decision Status: OpenCCB Priority: Responsible: Ann MillerSystem Release:

18

Source: International RequirementsEngineering Board, Foundation Level Syllabus, http://www.ireb.org

This structuring of change requests, as recommended by IREB, illustrates how important information structures are for effective requirements management.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 19: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Change Request Specification of Change Contents

Title: ICAO Code SearchDescription: Add a field for ICAO codes to the „Search Airport“ dialog.

Base Release: 2015-3-010User Interface Changes: Place search field „ICAO Code“ on “Search Airport“ dialog

between the „IATA Code“ field and the „Search“ button.Data Model Changes: Add new table „ICAO“. Add attribute „ICAO“ to table

„SRVPRV“ (Service Providers).Functional Changes: Search for ICAO codes in addition to IATA codes and city

names. Add airport name to list of results.Other Changes:

19

IREB change request structures should be complemented with content-related structures of a software change.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 20: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Change Request Management in RM Tool

20

ID Title Description Author ...ICAO Code Search Add ... Peter Smith ...

...

ID Description Author ...ICAO Code SearchAdd ...

Base Release...

User Interface Changes...

...

CR Specs …

Change Request Management

Change Requests

CR Specs Procurement

CR Specs Travel

ICAO Code Search

This is an example how the information structure of change requests can be implemented in a modern requirements tool in order to manage requirements efficiently.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Complex RM can hardly be accomplished without suitable tool support.Effective RM tool solutions must be customized by implementing appropriate requirements structures in the tool.

Page 21: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Structuring Collections of RequirementsExample: Volere Template

21

Source: S. Robertson and J. Robertson, Mastering the requirements process: Getting requirements right, vol. 3rd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley, 2012.

Project Drivers1. The Purpose of the Project2. The StakeholdersProject Constraints3. Mandated Constraints4. Naming Conventions and

Terminology5. Relevant Facts and AssumptionsFunctional Requirements6. The Scope of the Work7. Business Data Model & Data

Dictionary8. The Scope of the Product9. Functional Requirements

Non-functional Requirements10.Look and Feel Requirements11.Usability and Humanity

Requirements12.Performance Requirements13.Operational and Environmental

Requirements14.Maintainability and Support

Requirements15.Security Requirements16.Cultural and Political

Requirements17.Legal Requirements

Project Issues18.Open Issues19.Off-the-Shelf Solutions20.New Problems21.Tasks22.Migration to the New Product23.Risks24.Costs25.User Documentation and

Training26.Waiting Room27.Ideas for Solutions

There exist very many suggested templates for structuring requirements specification documents.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 22: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

22

Structuring Collections of RequirementsExample: Simplified Specification Document

FunctionalRequirements

User Interface Requirements

System Overview

DataRequirements

System interface Requirements

Non-Functional Requirements Glossary

Project Context Requirements

This is another simple structure for organizing requirements specifications. It defines different sections of a specification.Within each section, requirements might be structured further. For instance, the “Functional Requirements” section can be broken down into functional feature groups of the system to be developed.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 23: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Specification Document in RM Tool

23

Functional Requirements

Functional Area 3

Project

Objectives

System Overview

Scope & Context

Stakeholders

Facts & Assumptions

Constraints

Functional Area 1

Functional Area 2

ID Title Description Author ...Objective 1 ... ... ...

Objective 2

Objective 3

...

This example shows how a requirements specification can be implemented in a modern requirements tool.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 24: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Marketing & System Requirements inContinuous Product Development

24

Actors / Roles

System Requirements

Marketing Requirements

The system shall …

The product / service shall provide …

Requirements Specification

The phone shall have a very high usage time.

Example Requirements (Smartphone)

3,300 mAh battery capacity: The systemshall have a battery capacity of …

Fast Charge 5.3: The system shall have a charging circuit of type …

ProductManagement

SystemArchitect

Continuous product development calls for multi-layer requirements structures that serve different target groups. They should apply to many releases, generations, and variants of a product family.This example shows two layers for product management and for system architects.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 25: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Product Requirements in RM Tool

25

Product

Product Generation 1

Marketing Requirements

Product Generation 2

Product Generation 3

Functional Area 2

Functional Area 1

Functional Area 3

System Requirements

ID Title Description Author ...Usage Time The phone ... Kate Brown ...

...

...

...

ID Title Description Author Release ...3.300 mAh .... The system ... Bob Wood 2.2 ...

Fast Charge ...

...

...

This example shows how two layers of requirements in continuous product development can be structured.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 26: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Multi-Layer Requirements DefinitionsCase Study: Telecom Industry

26

System Requirements

Marketing Requirements

Component Requirements

Actors / Roles Requirements Catalog

ComponentArchitects

ProductManagement

SystemArchitect

The product / service shall provide …

The system shall …

The component shall …

Key Characteristics

§ Tool-based requirements management

§ Central repository with several 10K requirements and for several hundreds of users

§ Multi-stage requirements hierarchy from marketing requirements via system to component requirements

§ Requirements traces from product management to component development and testing

In large-scale industrial software and product development, requirements are being structured into three or more layers. Link structures express requirements breakdown across and within the layers.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Source: A. Gürtler, S. Mattern, A. Birk, and G. Heller, “Pferdewechsel bei vollem Galopp: Toolwechsel und Weiterentwicklung des RE in einer großen, komplexen Plattformentwicklung,” presented at the REConf 2014, München, März-2014.

Page 27: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Catalog-Based Requirements ReuseCase Study: Telecom Industry

27

System Requirements

Marketing Requirements

Component Requirements

Actors / Roles Requirements Catalog

ComponentArchitects

ProductManagement

SystemArchitect

The product / service shall provide …

The system shall …

The component shall …

Requirements Product Family B

System Requirements

Component Requirements

Marketing Requirements

Requirements Product Family A

System Requirements

Component Requirements

Marketing Requirements

Propagate updates from catalog to project 3

Feed back requirements changes from project to catalog

(change request & approval)2

Reuse / share requirements from catalog to project1b

Reuse / share requirements from catalog to project1a

Rich requirements structures in continuous product development provide the basis for advanced reuse strategies. Reuse establishes additional structures on the requirements base.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Source: A. Gürtler, S. Mattern, A. Birk, and G. Heller, “Pferdewechsel bei vollem Galopp: Toolwechsel und Weiterentwicklung des RE in einer großen, komplexen Plattformentwicklung,” presented at the REConf 2014, München, März-2014.

Page 28: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

User Story Mapping (Patton)

28

Sophisticated requirements structures are not specific to tool-based requirements management.User story mapping (Patton, 2014) is an example that (1) hand-written requirements and tangible items like sticky notes provide value to requirements management, and that (2) smart structuring is key to effective requirements management. In this case, structure is expressed by position, labelling, and color of the requirements statements.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 29: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Scaled Agile Framework SAFe® (Leffingwell)

29

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe®) illustrates that agile requirements management cannot stop at hand-written user stories, when it comes to really large and distributed development settings.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Source: D. Leffingwell, “Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)”, 2016. http://scaledagileframework.com/.SAFe® is a registered marks of Scaled Agile, Inc.

Page 30: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Landscapes of RM Structure

301 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 31: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Structure by Organizational Level & Phase

31

Organization Forms & Templates File Structures for Information & Artifact

Organization

Versioned DomainModels

Team Spontaneous Whiteboard Sketches

Specific Boards on Dedicated Locations

Team Workspace with Defined But Flexible Structure (e.g., Wiki)

Individual Informal Notes Uniform Personal Documentation Style

Personal Records,Files & Archives

(physical & electronic)

Time / Consolidation Phases of Information & Artifacts

This matrix presents some patterns of requirements structure for different organizational levels and for different phases of the requirements lifecycle.

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 32: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Structure in Different RM Contexts

32

Change-Request RM Project-Oriented RM Continuous Product RM ContextDimensions

CR ListTask List

Specification Document(Text or RM-Tool)

Template-Based Reuse

Two-/Three-Layer ModelCatalog-Based Reuse

Plan-Based

Requirements Base(RM-Tool)

Staged Product PlanningRequirements as Documentation

Hybrid

Kanban Board Scrum BoardUser Story Mapping SAFe®

Agile

Another way of looking on patterns of requirements structure relates them to different types of RM (horizontal axis) and to agile, plan-based (i.e., “non-agile”) and hybrid development (vertical axis).

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 33: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Summary

RM REQUIRES Structure

Current concepts & guidelines are not sufficient & partly misleading

Design structure intentionally

Use available patterns

Balance informal approaches & tool support

331 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 34: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Thank you!

Contact

Dr. Andreas Birk

[email protected], LinkedIn, Google+www.swpm.de

Blog & Resources: MakingOfSoftware.com

341 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 35: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Literature on Requirements Structure

35

Tony Gorschek and Claes Wohlin, "Requirements Abstraction Model", Requirements Engineering Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 79-101, 2006.

Systematic exploration of multi-layer requirements structures

Olga Liskin: How Artifacts Support and Impede Requirements Communication, In Samuel Fricker and Kurt Schneider, Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2015), pages 132-147. Springer International Publishing, 2015.

Investigation on how document-related structures support requirements management, grounded on empirical study

International Requirements Engineering Board (IREB). IREB Certified Professional for Requirements Engineering -Requirements Management, Advanced Level, Version 1.0.1, Ausgabe vom 11.01.2016, https://www.ireb.org/en/downloads/

Collection of many structure-related techniques and practices important to requirements management

1 March 2016 Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management

Page 36: 20160301 Struktur vor Inhalt Handout - HOOD Group€¦ · 2016-03-01  · Handout-Version Dr. Andreas Birk, Software.Process.Management 1. März 2016, REConf 2016, Unterschleißheim

Photo Credits Slides 2, 34 Andreas Birk

Slide 5 Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.de© Mostly Dans"office”, https://www.flickr.com/photos/dannyboymalinga/5047947357/sizes/l

Slide 6 Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.de© Ian.Kobylanski"Letters”, https://www.flickr.com/photos/iankobylanski/8608119554/

Slide 7 Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.de© Erich Ferdinand"P3090661”, https://www.flickr.com/photos/erix/13099074294/

Slide 8 Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.de© Metropolitan Transportation Authority of the State of New York"Weekend Work: April 25 - 28, 2014”, https://www.flickr.com/photos/mtaphotos/14049529972/

Slide 28 Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.de© Gerry Kirk"What do we need to build?”, https://www.flickr.com/photos/gkirk/11118087943/

Slide 30 Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.de© Tom Hall"Surrounded by mountains”, https://www.flickr.com/photos/tom_hall_nz/15158418383/

1 March 2016 36Copyright © 2016, Software.Process.Management