Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2017 BOE AdjustmentsAccount # Serial # New Market Value Old Market Value MV Difference New Taxable Value Old Taxable Value Taxable Difference
County Tax Dollar Difference Old Tax Estimate % Difference Explanation for adjustment
0332845 WDCS-B-13 1,086,583.00$ 1,086,583.00$ -$ 597,620.00$ 1,086,583.00$ (488,963.00)$ (582.84)$ 8,346.04$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0316848 BP-2 1,300,523.00$ 1,300,523.00$ -$ 769,809.00$ 1,300,523.00$ (530,714.00)$ (632.61)$ 9,694.10$ -40.81% Change to primary residence0186761 JR-2-244 817,191.00$ 817,191.00$ -$ 449,455.00$ 817,191.00$ (367,736.00)$ (438.34)$ 6,276.84$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0361802 CWPC-II-77 4,255,000.00$ 5,392,461.00$ (1,137,461.00)$ 4,255,000.00$ 5,392,461.00$ (1,137,461.00)$ (1,355.85)$ 39,052.20$ -21.09% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price0384440 CWPC-3A-101 4,200,000.00$ 5,046,303.00$ (846,303.00)$ 4,200,000.00$ 5,046,303.00$ (846,303.00)$ (1,008.79)$ 36,545.33$ -16.77% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price0374441 GWLD-II-128-AM 2,300,000.00$ 2,578,983.00$ (278,983.00)$ 2,300,000.00$ 2,578,983.00$ (278,983.00)$ (332.55)$ 10,342.42$ -10.82% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price0304315 BN-B-1-105 828,525.00$ 828,525.00$ -$ 455,689.00$ 455,689.00$ -$ -$ 3,500.15$ 0.00% No Change0181275 SS-69-12 150,000.00$ 150,000.00$ -$ 968.00$ 150,000.00$ (149,032.00)$ (177.65)$ 1,160.85$ -99.35% Change to FAA0361497 CWPC-II-64 4,400,000.00$ 7,102,469.00$ (2,702,469.00)$ 4,400,000.00$ 7,102,469.00$ (2,702,469.00)$ (3,221.34)$ 51,436.08$ -38.05% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price0183867 PB-4-177 810,526.00$ 810,526.00$ -$ 445,789.00$ 445,789.00$ -$ -$ 3,424.11$ 0.00% No Change0212401 PR-T-40 520,000.00$ 520,000.00$ -$ 286,000.00$ 520,000.00$ (234,000.00)$ (278.93)$ 3,994.12$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0487749 RBS-26 950,000.00$ 950,000.00$ -$ 522,500.00$ 950,000.00$ (427,500.00)$ (509.58)$ 6,879.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0055677 PT-20-B 410,000.00$ 420,000.00$ (10,000.00)$ 410,000.00$ 420,000.00$ (10,000.00)$ (11.92)$ 3,041.64$ -2.38% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price0397368 FPRV-21-B-1 440,000.00$ 440,000.00$ -$ 242,000.00$ 440,000.00$ (198,000.00)$ (236.02)$ 3,186.48$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0277032 ELK-4-2004 410,000.00$ 410,000.00$ -$ 225,500.00$ 410,000.00$ (184,500.00)$ (219.92)$ 3,149.21$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0470150 DMLC-4137-AM-RE 1,013,000.00$ 1,160,000.00$ (147,000.00)$ 1,013,000.00$ 1,160,000.00$ (147,000.00)$ (175.22)$ 8,400.72$ -12.67% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price0436547 CQVC-19 400,000.00$ 400,000.00$ -$ 220,000.00$ 400,000.00$ (180,000.00)$ (214.56)$ 2,896.80$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436505 CQVC-15 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0403448 APRMC-37 1,350,000.00$ 1,350,000.00$ -$ 742,500.00$ 1,350,000.00$ (607,500.00)$ (724.14)$ 10,557.00$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0490723 CCTS-B-10 260,000.00$ 260,000.00$ -$ 143,000.00$ 260,000.00$ (117,000.00)$ (139.46)$ 2,391.22$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0191225 SLB-2-R-2 800,000.00$ 800,000.00$ -$ 800,000.00$ 800,000.00$ -$ -$ 6,256.00$ 0.00% No Change0359830 BHWKS-2-139 508,012.00$ 508,012.00$ -$ 279,407.00$ 279,407.00$ -$ -$ 2,146.13$ 0.00% No Change0234736 JR-3-356 893,516.00$ 940,090.00$ (46,574.00)$ 491,433.00$ 517,050.00$ (25,617.00)$ (30.54)$ 6,971.46$ -4.95% Adjust value to comparable sales.0436604 CQVC-25 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436612 CQVC-26 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436620 CQVC-27 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436638 CQVC-28 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436646 CQVC-29 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436661 CQVC-31 400,000.00$ 400,000.00$ -$ 220,000.00$ 400,000.00$ (180,000.00)$ (214.56)$ 2,896.80$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436687 CQVC-33 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436745 CQVC-39 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436752 CQVC-40 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436828 CQVC-47 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,258.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0046668 PSC-401 110,000.00$ 110,000.00$ -$ 60,500.00$ 110,000.00$ (49,500.00)$ (59.00)$ 860.20$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0282537 FWM-1 1,387,336.00$ 1,387,336.00$ -$ 763,035.00$ 763,035.00$ -$ -$ 5,966.93$ 0.00% No Change0487244 1185-1A-2AM 1,068,720.00$ 1,068,720.00$ -$ 1,068,720.00$ 587,796.00$ 480,924.00$ 573.26$ 4,596.56$ 81.82% Change to Non primary residence0491447 FIDG-3 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 450,000.00$ 247,500.00$ 202,500.00$ 241.38$ 1,901.05$ 81.82% Change to Non primary residence0223044 PWL-3-I 125,000.00$ 125,000.00$ -$ 68,750.00$ 125,000.00$ (56,250.00)$ (67.05)$ 960.13$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0212518 RP-T-55 520,000.00$ 520,000.00$ -$ 520,000.00$ 286,000.00$ 234,000.00$ 278.93$ 2,196.77$ 81.82% Change to Non primary residence0491632 1280-A 900,000.00$ 900,000.00$ -$ 495,000.00$ 900,000.00$ (405,000.00)$ (482.76)$ 7,038.00$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0487718 RBS-23 950,000.00$ 950,000.00$ -$ 522,500.00$ 950,000.00$ (427,500.00)$ (509.58)$ 6,879.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0436653 CQVC-30 400,000.00$ 400,000.00$ -$ 220,000.00$ 400,000.00$ (180,000.00)$ (214.56)$ 2,896.80$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0176036 SLS-42 925,169.00$ 925,169.00$ -$ 508,842.00$ 925,169.00$ (416,327.00)$ (496.26)$ 7,106.22$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0479979 VKJ-SPA-1D 1,517,000.00$ 1,517,000.00$ -$ 1,105,358.00$ -$ 1,105,358.00$ 1,317.59$ -$ #DIV/0! Property should not be Exempt0213045 IRH-B-9 240,000.00$ 240,000.00$ -$ 132,000.00$ 240,000.00$ (108,000.00)$ (128.74)$ 1,876.80$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0333769 PNCR-H-11 295,000.00$ 295,000.00$ -$ 162,250.00$ 295,000.00$ (132,750.00)$ (158.24)$ 2,136.39$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0223861 PWL-1-S-8-G 175,000.00$ 175,000.00$ -$ 96,250.00$ 175,000.00$ (78,750.00)$ (93.87)$ 1,344.18$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0439541 LBHV-1-1312 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ -$ 137,500.00$ 250,000.00$ (112,500.00)$ (134.10)$ 1,810.50$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0037261 HR-101 835,447.00$ 1,248,640.00$ (413,193.00)$ 835,447.00$ 1,248,640.00$ (413,193.00)$ (492.53)$ 9,764.36$ -33.09% Corrected Square footage on house0394282 WCAN-I-12-AM 1,955,691.00$ 3,750,338.00$ (1,794,647.00)$ 1,955,691.00$ 3,750,338.00$ (1,794,647.00)$ (2,139.22)$ 33,483.02$ -47.85% Corrected Square footage on house0386171 SSS-4-550 740,000.00$ 1,063,155.00$ (323,155.00)$ 407,000.00$ 584,735.00$ (177,735.00)$ (211.86)$ 4,491.35$ -30.40% Adjust value to reflect Fee Appraisal0133904 HE-B-272 540,000.00$ 660,279.00$ (120,279.00)$ 339,120.00$ 405,273.00$ (66,153.00)$ (78.85)$ 3,112.90$ -16.32% Adjust value to reflect Fee Appraisal0300115 OOT-HSTONE-10 2,009,868.00$ 2,747,464.00$ (737,596.00)$ 2,009,868.00$ 2,747,464.00$ (737,596.00)$ (879.21)$ 21,485.17$ -26.85% Adjust value to comparable sales.0132492 HE-A-345 700,000.00$ 740,000.00$ (40,000.00)$ 392,100.00$ 415,100.00$ (23,000.00)$ (27.42)$ 3,188.38$ -5.54% Adjust value to reflect Fee Appraisal0423255 BB-53 1,550,000.00$ 1,609,414.00$ (59,414.00)$ 1,550,000.00$ 1,609,414.00$ (59,414.00)$ (70.82)$ 14,800.17$ -3.69% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price
0417919 PSKY-13 599,000.00$ 700,020.00$ (101,020.00)$ 599,000.00$ 700,020.00$ (101,020.00)$ (120.42)$ 6,249.78$ -14.43% Adjust value to comparable sales.0018360 PC-167 1,240,000.00$ 1,385,000.00$ (145,000.00)$ 1,240,000.00$ 1,385,000.00$ (145,000.00)$ (172.84)$ 10,830.70$ -10.47% Adjust Leaseable Square Footage0057699 PWV-A-38 625,000.00$ 793,258.00$ (168,258.00)$ 343,750.00$ 436,292.00$ (92,542.00)$ (110.31)$ 3,351.16$ -21.21% Adjust value to comparable sales.0476963 WBCS-3 273,131.00$ 221,098.00$ 52,033.00$ 150,222.00$ 221,098.00$ (70,876.00)$ (84.48)$ 1,826.71$ -32.06% Change to primary residence0401053 MFR-1 413,474.00$ 413,474.00$ -$ 230,279.00$ 230,279.00$ -$ -$ 1,793.18$ 0.00% No Change0472365 CD-202-J-1 155,875.00$ 155,875.00$ -$ 155,875.00$ 155,875.00$ -$ -$ 1,238.27$ 0.00% No Change0459041 SSP-S-1 12,000.00$ 100,000.00$ (88,000.00)$ 12,000.00$ 100,000.00$ (88,000.00)$ (104.90)$ 814.00$ -88.00% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price0179360 SCT-309-AM 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ -$ 192,500.00$ 350,000.00$ (157,500.00)$ (187.74)$ 2,737.00$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0487268 PRESC-10 2,600,000.00$ 3,200,000.00$ (600,000.00)$ 2,600,000.00$ 3,200,000.00$ (600,000.00)$ (715.20)$ 25,024.00$ -18.75% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price0465916 ESCLAL-618-AM 710,000.00$ 1,287,500.00$ (577,500.00)$ 710,000.00$ 1,287,500.00$ (577,500.00)$ (688.38)$ 9,324.08$ -44.85% Adjust value to comparable sales.0356992 CRQJ-1-AM 525,000.00$ 525,000.00$ -$ 288,750.00$ 525,000.00$ (236,250.00)$ (281.61)$ 4,032.53$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0016497 CR-29-B-2AM 595,000.00$ 595,000.00$ -$ 327,250.00$ 595,000.00$ (267,750.00)$ (319.16)$ 4,652.90$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0394365 WCAN-I-20-AM 360,000.00$ 360,000.00$ -$ 360,000.00$ 360,000.00$ -$ -$ 3,214.08$ 0.00% No Change0394688 WHLS-12 500,720.00$ 500,720.00$ -$ 500,720.00$ 500,720.00$ -$ -$ 4,604.62$ 0.00% No Change0032486 EH-G-2 310,000.00$ 310,000.00$ -$ 170,500.00$ 310,000.00$ (139,500.00)$ (166.28)$ 2,424.20$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0420046 ESCLAL-333-AM 710,000.00$ 710,000.00$ -$ 710,000.00$ 710,000.00$ -$ -$ 5,141.82$ 0.00% No Change0286223 ASR-II-64 1,007,454.00$ 1,007,454.00$ -$ 573,404.00$ 1,007,454.00$ (434,050.00)$ (517.39)$ 7,878.29$ -43.08% Change to primary residence0395198 WHLS-63 340,000.00$ 351,120.00$ (11,120.00)$ 340,000.00$ 351,120.00$ (11,120.00)$ (13.26)$ 3,228.90$ -3.17% Adjust Value to Contract Sales Price0399455 SMS-2 848,679.00$ 848,679.00$ -$ 466,773.00$ 466,773.00$ -$ -$ 3,380.37$ 0.00% No Change0037352 HR-18 3,054,760.00$ 3,054,760.00$ -$ 1,682,773.00$ 3,054,760.00$ (1,371,987.00)$ (1,635.41)$ 23,888.22$ -44.91% Change to primary residence0036388 3K-1-L 600,000.00$ 600,000.00$ -$ 600,000.00$ 330,000.00$ 270,000.00$ 321.84$ 2,580.60$ 81.82% Change to Non primary residence0346290 BHVS-4 605,000.00$ 605,000.00$ -$ 605,000.00$ 332,750.00$ 272,250.00$ 324.52$ 2,409.78$ 81.82% Change to Non primary residence0491500 FIDG-9 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,456.45$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0397152 FPRV-17-C-2 490,000.00$ 490,000.00$ -$ 490,000.00$ 269,500.00$ 220,500.00$ 262.84$ 1,951.72$ 81.82% Change to Non primary residence0410989 NPKTH-2-26 455,000.00$ 455,000.00$ -$ 250,250.00$ 455,000.00$ (204,750.00)$ (244.06)$ 3,295.11$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0034003 PAC-8-AM 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 247,500.00$ 450,000.00$ (202,500.00)$ (241.38)$ 3,519.00$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0221212 PDP-207-B 220,000.00$ 220,000.00$ -$ 121,000.00$ 220,000.00$ (99,000.00)$ (118.01)$ 1,720.40$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0099337 AM-69 243,950.00$ 243,950.00$ -$ 134,172.00$ 243,950.00$ (109,778.00)$ (130.86)$ 1,937.94$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0267439 OAKS-92 325,000.00$ 406,250.00$ (81,250.00)$ 325,000.00$ 406,250.00$ (81,250.00)$ (96.85)$ 3,176.88$ -20.00% Adjust value to comparable sales.0351696 EM-11-AM 656,575.00$ 656,575.00$ -$ 420,011.00$ 493,373.00$ (73,362.00)$ (87.45)$ 4,030.86$ -14.87% Change to primary residence
Totals for 8/30/2017 70,372,725.00$ 80,749,914.00$ (10,377,189.00)$ 54,838,830.00$ 73,395,626.00$ (18,556,796.00)$ (22,119.70)$ Totals for 8/23/2017 132,929,310.00 176,133,731.00 (43,204,421.00) 98,664,735.00 157,184,708.00 (58,519,973.00) (69,755.81) Totals for 8/9/2017 46,587,443.00$ 47,075,939.00$ (488,496.00)$ 29,892,442.00$ 46,388,615.00$ (16,496,173.00)$ (19,663.43)$
Running Total 249,889,478.00$ 303,959,584.00$ (54,070,106.00)$ 183,396,007.00$ 276,968,949.00$ (93,572,942.00)$ (111,538.94)$
The Market value decrease for 2017 is ( $54,070,106) As of 8/30/2017
The Taxable Value decrease for 2017 is ($ 93,572,942) As of 8/30/2017
The County Tax dollar Difference for 2017 is ( $ 111,538.94) As of 8/30/2017
The county Tax dollar differences are the County General and County Municipal line rates.
1 | P a g e
Report to Summit County Council
Project ABC Background In September of 2015, local Summit County Arts and Culture groups began to meet to advocate for more support for arts and culture countywide. In November of 2015, Randy Barton made presentations to the City and County Council regarding the Arts & Cultural Initiative and to ask for government support and participation of the effort. Both City and County Council agreed that the arts are a vital part of our community and asked that the ACIG (Arts and Culture Initiative Group) create a steering committee to work on next steps to achieve their goals. A County staff person and Council liaison were appointed to serve (Roger Armstrong/Travis English). As one of the people who helped to spearhead the Arts and Culture Initiative, Randy Barton convened a steering committee that included community business leaders and arts and culture representatives. The steering committee began work to formulate a definition of the arts, and collect directory information about artists and organizations connected to arts and culture. The initial definition of the arts encompassed the following creative sectors; Fine Arts - painting, drawing, sculpting Performing Arts - theatre (acting, announcing, directing, theatrical design
& build), dance and choreography, concerts (music and singing), Decorative Arts - crafts, ceramics, printmaking, textile arts Applied Arts - film and video, animation, photography, architecture, graphic design,
digital arts, humanities, folklore and historic preservation, literature and writing. Educational Arts - youth or adult instruction and education of artistic fields.
The steering committee also reviewed the Arts Master Plans for other cities including: Austin Boulder Telluride Santa Cruz
2 | P a g e
At the November 2016 Steering Committee meeting, members asked questions regarding the goals and process unfolding and stated their support of a formal Arts and Culture Master Planning project. The Park City Summit County Arts Council was asked to put together a scope of work for managing this project that included a timeline, workplan, and budget. Their proposal for a one-year process was approved by the Steering Committee and a diverse set of stakeholders came to fund the work, including all of the Steering Committee members and a number of other local businesses, nonprofits, and individuals from the community. The County contributed $15K. The Steering Committee continues to oversee the project and meets on the third Friday of the month to review progress and hold the Arts Council accountable for the work. An Arts & Culture Master Plan is a planning strategy to help support a community’s quality of life, economic development, and tourism goals. Such a plan also helps to align with the community’s values and needs. Community planners, city and county officials, arts and culture organizations and citizens work together to celebrate and grow the role that arts and culture plays in community vitality. Because an Arts & Culture Master Plan is a collaborative effort, it is likely that the funding sources for such a plan for the City and Summit County will be inclusive of local governments and private funding. Project ABC Scope of Work The approved scope of work for the year-long planning process includes three overlapping phases: data collection, convenings, and documentation. The proposed budget was $83,500. Fundraising efforts yielded $95,250 in commitments of which $90,850 has been received to date with the remainder expected to be received over the coming months. Approximately $30,000 has been spent to date. The stated goal of Project ABC is as follows: The Master Plan will be a roadmap to drive the future of arts and culture in Summit County and include a set of short and long term recommendations that address the needs of the larger community, grow investment in our creative sector, connect arts and culture to City and County priorities, and support the long-term vitality of our arts and culture nonprofits. Project ABC Progress to Date The Arts Council engaged Jake McIntire of Union Creative Agency as a consultant to help manage the project. Jake began work in April. An intern from the Westminster College Master’s of Community Leadership program has also been engaged to support data collection and analysis.
3 | P a g e
The following milestones have been reached in the first five months of the effort: Five Workgroups were formed representing the diverse stakeholders in the process
who meet at key points to provide guidance and content direction. (These include: Nonprofit Sector, Business Sector, Creative Sector, Youth, Finance)
A website (projectabcsc.com) was designed and launched to serve as a platform for engagement in the effort.
An outreach toolkit was built to help stakeholders promote the effort to their constituencies: projectabcsc.com/toolkit.
A digital pledge was developed which currently has over 1,000 signatures from people who identify as advocates for an investment of time and resources in arts and culture in Park City and Summit County.
A survey was drafted, reviewed by Workgroup and Steering Committee members, and released.
An outreach campaign has begun using canvassing at events, earned and paid media, and influencer strategies to encourage participation. Over 250 people have taken the survey.
Interviews with key stakeholders have begun with over 20 planned during the data collection period.
A social media strategy centered on Facebook was launched to provide a place to post progress, best practices, and relevant information on arts and culture.
Benchmark communities were identified and research has begun to collect information on how other communities organize and fund their arts and culture efforts.
Local secondary data is being compiled about the state of arts and culture in Summit County including economic impacts, audience size, and funding.
Partnerships are being developed with statewide organizations including the Utah Cultural Alliance and Utah Division of Arts and Museums to engage them in the effort and consider future funding opportunities for Park City and Summit County arts and culture.
A core value of the Project ABC initiative is to think big and plan for the future while documenting wins along the way. A clear measure of impact is the number of people engaged in the effort—with over
80 individuals actively participating in meetings and interviews to date, from a variety of sectors in our community.
A number of community activities have used arts and culture as a means to connect the community including the Latino Arts Fest, View from My Door public art installation in commercial buildings across the county, and Monster Drawing Rally.
Professional development is a common theme heard from the creative sector workgroup and early survey results. Groups like the Park City Professional Artist Association and Pando Labs are hearing that need and developing new ways to offer this support.
The City’s stated investment in developing a new arts and culture district in Bonanza Park is a significant win for the future of arts and culture in the community.
4 | P a g e
Some of the high level challenges and areas of attention for Project ABC include:
The need for all stakeholders to support outreach to ensure findings reflect the input from a representative sampling of our diverse community. The Christian Center and Ed Foundation are two new groups that have agreed to help push information out to their constituencies, but there are many more opportunities to extend the reach of the project.
Ensuring broad participation from a mix of stakeholders in the Project ABC Summit (a community convening to be held in November) to validate findings, establish priorities, and move into action planning.
Establishing commitments to action from various stakeholder groups that reflect the findings coming from data collection and convenings.
Developing a collaborative financing strategy that includes funding alternatives/options from a variety of sectors to support the range of implementation action items.
Next Steps Over the next six months, Project ABC will conduct the following activities. Complete primary and secondary data collection Synthesize and analyze findings Convene a Project ABC Summit where all Workgroups and Steering Committee
members in addition to the general public will be invited to come together. The goal will be to present/validate the findings, prioritize, and move into action planning.
Consider the development and release of a micro-grant process where community members can apply for small projects ($250-500 range) to pilot quick win ideas
Documentation of the process, findings, recommendations, action steps, and financial considerations
Project ABC is on track to meet its stated deliverables as outlined in the approved scope of work. The County’s involvement in the process and financial support of the effort is a critical component in its success.
Project ABC is a cultural master planning process that will build a roadmap for the future of arts and culture in
Summit County. .
leadership structure
Arts Council: Project Management
Steering Committee: Oversight and Accountability
Workgroups: Content and Direction
1. Data Collection and Analysis2. Convenings and Engagement3. Documentation and
Recommendations
three (overlapping) scope of work phases
1. Primarya. Pledge/Surveyb. Interviews/Focus Groupsc. Creative Collection
2. Secondarya. Local Economic Measuresb. National Economic Measuresc. County Datad. Local Agency Datae. Directory/Database
data collection
1. Website/Social Media 2. Public Relations3. Event Outreach4. Workgroups
public outreach
timeline
MAY
Soft launch Website
PR Workgroups
JUNE/JULY/AUGUST
Data CollectionWorkgroupsArt Parties
SEPT/OCT
Data CollectionSummit
Quick Wins
NOV/DEC/JAN
WorkgroupsFindings
Policy
FEB/MARCH/APRIL
Action Planning/Phasing
FinancingCouncil Mtgs
Ways to help
● Help with outreach (especially to Eastern Summit County)
● Participate in the Project ABC Summit in November.
● Ideas for ensuring the plan is ultimately useful and adopted by the County. ·
● Clarification on any County process required for plan endorsement/adoption.
● Council commitments to action based on priorities
60 North MainP.O. Box 128Coalville, UT 84017
Phone (435) 336-3124, 615-3124, 783-4351 x3124Fax (435) 336-3024
STAFF REPORT To: Summit County Council From: Ray Milliner, County Planner Date of Meeting: August 30, 2017 Type of Item: Special Exception – Work Session Process: Legislative Review Recommendation This work session was scheduled to introduce the proposed Special Exception to the County Council. Staff recommends that the Council review the project and provide feedback to the developer and Staff. No action/recommendation is requested at this meeting. Project Description
Project Name: Habitat for Humanity Special Exception Applicant(s): Habitat for Humanity Property Owner(s): Corporation of the Episcopal Church of Utah Location: 4595 Silver Springs Road Zone District: Rural Residential (RR) Parcel Number and Size: SPR-7-2AM-X, 3.97 acres Type of Process: Special Exception Final Land Use Authority: Summit County Council
Proposal The developer is requesting a Special Exception to grant up to 10 units of affordable single family attached dwellings on a 1 acre parcel at 4595 Silver Springs Road. The property is in the Rural Residential (RR) zone. The allowed density in the RR zone is one unit per twenty (20) acres on developable lands and one unit per forty (40) acres on sensitive lands.
1
Habitat for Humanity Special Exception
Vicinity Map
Background On July 28, 2017 the developer submitted a Special Exception application to permit up to 10 units of affordable single family attached dwellings on a 1 acre parcel at 4595 Silver Springs Road. The proposed location of the density is currently part of Lot #7 of The Springs Subdivision. Lot 7 is 3.97 acres in size. The existing St. Luke’s Episcopal Church and its parking lot occupy 3 acres, with the remaining 1 acre vacant. If the Special Exception is approved, the developer intends to subdivide Lot #7 and develop the vacant 1 acre parcel. Section 10-2-4.B of the Snyderville Basin Development Code states:
“Density: In areas that are not already platted, or otherwise entitled, the base density shall be one unit per twenty (20) acres on developable lands and one unit per forty (40) acres on sensitive lands.”
2
Habitat for Humanity Special Exception
The developer is requesting that the Special Exception allow up to 10 units of affordable single family attached dwellings on the lot. To date, the developer has not submitted draft subdivision or site design plans for the project, because they would like to have assurances that the project can be approved prior to incurring the expense of creating the plans. The purpose of this work session is to introduce the application to the County Council and get initial feedback for the developer and staff. Issue Identification (Discussion Requested)
I. This is the first Special Exception application of this type that the County Council has reviewed. Research into County Planning files failed to turn up any other Special Exception applications that propose a significant increase in density over what is allowed in the underlying zoning district. Generally an increase in density would be reviewed as a Specially Planned Area.
II. The developer does not qualify for any other applicable County processes:
a. A variance would not be available because State Code does not allow “Use” variances.
b. Due to the size and location of the property a rezone would not be permissible because it would be considered a “spot zone” and would be contrary to the stated goals and policies of the Snyderville Basin General Plan.
c. The Specially Planned Area process is not available, as it is only allowed in the Town Center (TC) zone.
III. The Springs Subdivision has 7 lots, 6 of which are single family. Lot sizes range from 1.26
acres in size to .31 acres. To the south is an existing elementary school, to the north and east are single family homes on lots of approximately .30 acres. The proposed 1 acre parcel would have 10 single family townhomes, which would be a significant increase in density in comparison with the surrounding uses. Staff is requesting discussion as to whether or not the proposed density increase is appropriate mix of use and form for the surrounding neighborhood.
IV. There is a need for affordable/employee housing in the Snyderville Basin. The developer, Habitat for Humanity, has earned a reputation as a respectable developer of affordable housing. Staff is requesting feedback from the Council as to whether or not the need for housing and the developer’s ability to provide a quality product outweigh the underlying density requirements.
V. To date no subdivision plans or site design plans have been created for the proposed use. As a nonprofit, the developer has stated that they do not want to expend more
3
Habitat for Humanity Special Exception
money than is necessary before they have reasonable assurances the project is possible. Does the Council have enough information to make a reasoned decision for the project or is more information necessary?
Required Criteria The SCC may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Special Exception based upon written findings of fact according to each of the following standards. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide written and graphic evidence demonstrating compliance. Upon receiving direction from the County Council, staff will provide analysis. Standard 1: The Special Exception is not detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare; Standard 2: The intent of the development code and general plan will be met; Standard 3: The applicant does not reasonably qualify for any other equitable processes provided through the provisions of this title; Standard 4: There are equitable claims or unique circumstances warranting the Special Exception. Recommendation This work session was scheduled to introduce the proposed Special Exception to the County Council. Staff recommends that the Council review the project and provide feedback to the developer and Staff. No action/recommendation is requested. Attachments Exhibit A – Applicant narrative Exhibit B – Copy of The Springs Subdivision Plat
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
STAFF REPORT To: Summit County Council From: Patrick Putt, Community Development Director Date of Meeting: August 30, 2017 Type of Item: Agricultural Land Use Regulations in the Snyderville Basin Process: Work Session A work session is scheduled for the August 30th County Council meeting to discuss agricultural land use activities and how such uses are regulated in the Snyderville Basin Planning District. This matter primarily stems from recent public comment regarding agricultural‐related activities in the Old Ranch Road neighborhood. This memorandum serves to provide the Council with a broad overview of how agriculture is addressed Basin wide. The Snyderville Basin General Plan and Agriculture: The enabling language for managing agricultural uses in the Snyderville Basin Planning District originates in the Snyderville Basin General Plan. There are two policies addressing agriculture in the Plan. These two policies are: Policy 2.39: “Work with property owners to maintain working farms and ranches as a viable industry.” Policy 5.1: “Recognize agricultural operations as a significant and important use of the land and protect the rights of those uses.” The Snyderville Basin Development Code and Agriculture: Zoning is the tool by which the policies of the General Plan are implemented. In the Snyderville Basin Planning District, agriculture is specifically defined as: “The tilling of soil, raising of crops, foraging, grazing, and animal/fish for commercial agricultural purposes, not including logging, animal hospitals, recreational activity not normally associated with ranch/farm, or similar uses.” (Snyderville Basin Development Code, Section 10‐11‐1)
Agriculture is an Allowed Use in all zoning districts in the Snyderville Basin Planning District. An “Allowed Use” is a use by right and, under the Snyderville Basin Development Code, not subject to special review and approval by the Snyderville Basin Planning Commission or County Council. Allowed Uses are required to be conducted in a manner consistent with all underlying zoning requirements, such as setback, height, and all other requisite County codes, and health nuisance regulations. The Snyderville Basin Development Code does not limit the number of animals/livestock or tilled area on agricultural properties. There are certain other related land use activities permitted in the Basin through the Conditional Use Permit, Low Impact Permit, or Temporary Use Permit processes depending on the specific zoning district. These uses include:
Private and Commercial Horse Boarding
Commercial Horse Stables and Riding Academies
Wholesale Nurseries
Seasonal Plant and Agricultural Sales Conditional, Low‐Impact, and Temporary Uses require special review and approval by the County Staff, Snyderville Basin Planning Commission, or County Council depending on the specific land use that is requested. Conditional, Low‐Impact, and Temporary Use may be approved subject to specific conditions or performance requirements. Like Allowed Uses, they are also required to be conducted in a manner consistent with all underlying zoning requirements, such as setback, height, and all other requisite County codes, and health nuisance regulations. The County allows for other limited code exemptions for Agricultural Uses such as:
Exemptions from building permit requirements for Agricultural Buildings (however, such structures must meet required setback and height regulations); and
Exemptions from grading permits
Exemptions from the County Noise Ordinance Land Use and Health Nuisance Enforcement: Land Use regulations, i.e. use, building height, setback, etc. are enforced by the Community Development Department’s Code Enforcement Officer. Health nuisances such as fly control, manure, refuse, and odor are enforced by the County Health Department.
Agricultural‐Residential Land Use Conflicts: Despite the resort, residential, and commercial growth in the Snyderville Basin over the past several decades, conflicts between agricultural and non‐agricultural uses have been very few in number. This is likely due, in part, to agricultural operations taking place on large acreages where potential impacts and/or nuisances are mitigated by distance. Residents at a recent Council meeting expressed concern over agricultural operations taking place on small Rural‐Residential zoned parcels. Among their concerns are problems related, but not limited to, flies, odors, dust, and traffic. They have requested County action to address these issues. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council discuss the existing Snyderville Basin General Plan policies relating to agriculture and the current Development Code to determine whether or not amendments are needed. If Council finds that changes are necessary they may direct Staff to work with the Snyderville Basin Planning Commission to forward recommendations as part of their pending Development Code amendment work.
STAFF REPORT To: Summit County Council From: Ray Milliner, County Planner Date of Meeting: August 30, 2017 Type of Item: Temporary Zoning Ordinance Process: Legislative RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Summit County Council review and vote to approve the proposed temporary zoning ordinance to reinstate the “10 acre split” in the AP zone in the Eastern Summit County Development Code.
Background/Analysis On June 14, 2017 the County Council approved amendments to the Eastern Summit County Development Code Chapters 2 and 4 as well as the Definitions. One of the significant changes to Chapter 4 was the elimination of Section 11‐4‐8 Minor Subdivision of Property Review. It was replaced with Section 11‐4‐5.B. Subdivisions Consisting of Three or Less Lots. The Minor Subdivision of Property chapter featured a provision that allowed a property owner in the Agriculture Protection (AP) zone to subdivide a lawfully created parcel that was 10 acres or larger into two lots under the minor subdivision process, even though the base density of the AP zone is 40 acres (commonly referred to as a 10 acre split). On August 9, 2017 following input from members of the public, the County Council directed staff to create a temporary zoning ordinance to reinstate the 10 acre split for 6 months or until final action on the Eastern Summit County Zoning Map is taken.
Issues/Analysis The purpose of the 10 acre split was to provide property owners in the AP zone with a simple and quick way to split their property. Much of the farmland/flat/developable land in Eastern Summit County is zoned AP, which means a parcel must have at least 80 acres (minimum of 40 acres per lot) to be divided in two. The 10 acre split provided an additional option for property owners who do not have 80 acres but would like to divide it and give/sell a parcel to a family member or sell it etc. The rationale for removing the 10 acre split language from Chapter 4 was that the amendments to the Zoning Map would upzone many of the areas where the 10 acre split was applied. The
Code Amendments
Planning Commission recommended that much of the AP zone be rezoned to AG‐6 or AG‐20 (6 and 20 acres per lot respectively). However, since the amendments to chapter 4 have preceded the adoption of any changes to the Zoning Map, property owners have been left without the option of the 10 acre split or the extra density that would come with a 6 or 20 acre zone. As a result, this temporary zoning ordinance is proposed to fill the gap between the adoption of Chapter 4 in June and the time when the Council adopts amendments to the Zoning Map. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Summit County Council review and vote to approve the proposed temporary zoning ordinance to reinstate the “10 acre split” in the Eastern Summit County in the AP zone of the Development Code.
Exhibits
Exhibit A. Proposed Ordinance
Code Amendments
SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH ORDINANCE NO. ________
A TEMPORARY LAND USE REGULATION CREATING A TEMPORARY ZONING
ORDINANCE ALLOWING A PROPERTY OWNER IN THE AGRICULTURE PROTECTION (AP) ZONE TO SUBDIVIDE A LAWFULLY CREATED PARCEL
THAT IS 10 ACRES OR LARGER INTO TWO LOTS IN THE EASTERN SUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AREA.
PREAMBLE
WHEREAS, Chapter 4 of the Eastern Summit County Development Code was amended in June 14, 2017; and WHEREAS, one of the significant changes to Chapter 4 on June 14, 2017 was the elimination of Section 11-4-8 Minor Subdivision of Property Review. WHEREAS, The Minor Subdivision of Property chapter featured a provision that allowed a property owner in the Agriculture Protection (AP) zone to subdivide a lawfully created parcel that was 10 acres or larger into two lots under the minor subdivision process, even though the base density of the AP zone is 40 acres. WHEREAS, the rationale for removing the 10 acre split language from Chapter 4 was that the amendments to the Zoning Map would upzone many of the areas where the 10 acre split was applied. WHEREAS, since June 14, 2017 no amendments to the Eastern Summit County Zoning Map have been made. WHEREAS, the goal of Chapter 2 of the Eastern Summit County General Plan is to develop land use codes which balance the diversity of desires of Eastern Summit County residents, including private property rights; and WHEREAS, In furtherance of this goal, §11-1-1 of the Eastern Summit County Code provides that “The eastern Summit County general plan was developed to ensure that the rural, agricultural and small town character of the eastern portion of the county shall remain, even in the presence of growth and change. The intention of the county is to assure the managed, proper and sensitive development of land to protect and enhance these desired qualities and the lifestyle that exists”; and WHEREAS, the Summit County Council is are currently in the process of evaluating amendments to the Eastern Summit County Zoning Map, which could rezone many areas currently zoned Agriculture Protection (AP) to the AG-6 and AG-20 zones. WHEREAS, this temporary zoning ordinance will make it easier and more user-friendly for both County staff and the general public of Eastern Summit County alike; and
Code Amendments
WHEREAS, on August 30, 2017 the Summit County Council held a public hearing on the proposed temporary zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, The Summit County Council finds there is a compelling public interest that justifies the proposed temporary regulations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Summit County Council acting as the County Legislative Body as follows: Section 1. The Eastern Summit County Development Code is amended as depicted in
Exhibit A. Section 2. Effective Period. This ordinance shall be effective for six months from the
effective date of this ordinance, expiring at 5:00 p.m. on February 28, 2018 or until such time as the County Council adopts amendments to the Eastern Summit County Zoning Map, whichever occurs first.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon publication as allowed by
law. Section 5. Savings Clause. In the event any part, term, or provision of this ordinance is held
by the courts to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of Utah, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations herein described shall be construed and enforced as if the ordinance did not contain the particular part, term or provision held to be invalid.
COUNTY COUNCIL SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH by_________________________________
Chris Robinson, Chair
Councilmember Robinson voted ____ Councilmember Clyde voted ____ Councilmember Armstrong voted ____ Councilmember Wright voted ____ Councilmember Carson voted ____ ATTEST: ______________________________________________________ County Clerk, Summit County, Utah
Code Amendments
EXHIBIT A
In the Agriculture Preservation (AP) zone, a Conforming Parcel that is not within a previously approved Subdivision Plat and is ten (10) acres or larger will be considered for one additional lot under the Subdivisions Consisting of Three or Less Lots process in Section 11-4-5.B. of the Eastern Summit County Development Code.
1
STAFFREPORTTo: CountyCouncilReportDate: August25,2017MeetingDate: August30,2017Description: PublicSafetyCommunicationsCenterServiceAgreement SummitCountyChartofPositions ExecutiveOrderestablishingthePublicSafetyCommunicationsAdvisory CouncilTypeofItem: DecisionThisstaffreportprovidestheCountyCouncilwithahistoryofwhathasbroughtSummitCountyandParkCity to recommend the two dispatch centers to be consolidated and four required action items toconsolidatetheSummitCountyCommunicationsCenterandtheParkCityDispatchCenter intoaPublicSafety Communications Center. The Sheriff’s Office and the Park City Police Department have beenworking on a regionally consolidated system for the past year and it is ready for approval of bothCouncils.ThispresentationwillprovidetheCouncilwithbackground,analysisandarecommendationonhowtoproceed.A. BackgroundThe Park City Police Department and the Summit County Sheriff’s Office (SCSO) have been discussingconsolidation for several years with the intent of sharing costs, increasing efficiency, increasinginteroperability,andeliminating911calltransfers.In2016and2017theUtahStateLegislaturepassedlegislationencouragingdispatchcenterconsolidationstatewide. This new legislation eliminated the funding for secondary PSAPs (Public Safety AnsweringPoint)and increasedthe funding forprimaryPSAPs.Thedecrease in fundingnegatively impactedParkCity Dispatch’s revenue. Summit County as the primary PSAP in our geographical location was thebeneficiaryoftheincreaseforprimaryPSAPs.These legislative actions created an impetus to further study dispatch consolidation andmove in thatdirection.Thesediscussionsincludedlawenforcement,legal,finance,andpersonnelstaffsfrombothParkCityandSummitCounty.Toaddresspersonnelstaffing issuesatbothcenters (medicalandattrition)effective July1,2017,ParkCityDispatchwasco‐locatedintheSummitCountyCommunicationsCenterwithCountypersonnelattheSCSO.Thistemporaryco‐locationhasincreasedefficiencyandpublicsafety.Whileoperatingjointly,bothentitieshaveretainedfinancialandadministrativeresponsibilityfortheirrespectiveemployees.
2
OnAugust23,2017,theSheriff’sOfficemetwiththeSummitCountyCounciltoinformthemofthedesireoftheParkCityPoliceDepartmentandtheSummitCountySheriff’sOfficetoconsolidatethetwodispatchcenters. TheCouncil recommended the Summit County Sheriff’sOffice continuewith the consolidationprocess of Summit County Dispatch and Park City Dispatch at the Summit County Public SafetyCommunicationsCenter.TheCouncilwasmadeawaretherewerefouractionitemstocomebeforethemtoday.Theseinclude:
1. Giving direction to the County Manager as to the approval of the Service AgreementwithParkCityMunicipal;2. AmendingtheSummitCountyChartofPositions;3. GivingdirectiontotheBudgetOfficerregardingamendmentstotherevenuesand expenditurestothe2017Budget;and4. Giving direction to the County Manager to establish the Public Safety CommunicationsCenterAdvisoryCouncilby ExecutiveOrder.
Thisstaffreportwilladdressthesefouritems.B. ActionItems1. PublicSafetyCommunicationsCenterServiceAgreementThis document spells out the details of the merger of the two dispatch centers. The Public SafetyCommunicationsCentershallprovidecontinuousdispatchoperationsandwillbeavailable twenty‐fourhoursaday,sevendaysaweek,toanswerallrequeststoandfrompublicsafetyagenciesandthepublic,and to dispatch the appropriate agency and/or personnel. The Communications Center will now bedispatchingforallpublicsafetyagenciesinSummitCounty.ThecenterwillalsoprovidesupportforParkCity’s internalservices,similartotheserviceprovidedbySummitCountyDispatchtoAnimalControl,PublicWorks,etc.AfterbothSummitCountyandParkCityCouncilsapprovetheServiceAgreementSummitCountyHumanResources will advertise for five dispatchers. Preferential treatment will be afforded to qualifiedapplicantswhohavepreviouslyworkedforParkCityinadispatchposition.Thisisinthehopesofhiringdispatcherswithaworkingknowledgeoftheareaandcurrentoperations.Forthebalanceof2017ParkCitywillpaytheDispatchServiceFeeof$200,000onorbeforeDecember31,2017.Fortheyear2018,ParkCitywillpaySummitCounty$600,000intwoinstallments.ThefirstpaymentonJuly12018,andthesecondonorbeforeDecember31,2018.SummitCounty'scostperCommunicationFTE was determined to be $120,000 annually. This includes salaries, benefits, overtime, training,professional and technical, contracts, and fleet payment. (Ratio of 2016 budget based on a five‐yearamortizationschedule.)Thepayment for the first sixmonthsof 2019will be $300,000. It is expected that bothparties to thisagreementwillbeginnegotiationsinmidtolate2018onwhatbasiswillpaymentbedeterminedforthebalanceof2019andmovingforward.IfthereisnoagreementbetweenthetwoagenciesbeginningJuly12019, the annual paymentwill be $600,000, as adjusted for cost of living, asmeasured by the annualaverageConsumerPriceIndex.TheadditionofthefiveadditionaldispatcherswillhaveanetzeroeffectontheSummitCountybudget.
3
Due to the increase in workload and the need for additional employees, the current CommunicationsCenter at the Sheriff'sOfficewill need to be remodeled. The remodelwill remove the non‐functioningrestroom and the breakroom in dispatch and renovate a closet that currently opens into the Sheriff'sOffice training room. The closet, after renovation, will open into the Communications Center. TheremodeledCommunicationsCenterwillincludeeightconsolepositions(currentlytherearefive),anewvoice/radio loggingrecorder, reconstructedbreakroom,andasmallconferenceroom.Twoof theeightconsolepositionshavebeenincludedforcriticaleventstaffingandfuturegrowth.DuringtherenovationdispatchserviceswillbelocatedattheParkCityDispatchCenter.Thecostforthisremodelis$216,700.ParkCityhasagreedtopay$108,350withinforty‐fivedaysofthesignedServiceAgreementtocoverhalfofthecostoftheremodelattheCommunicationsCenter.SummitCounty'sportion for thisprojectwillcomeoutof theexisting2017Sheriff’sOfficeoperatingbudget. Inthisyear’sSheriff’sbudget,$400,000wasbudgetedfortheNextGen911operatingserver,thiscostwastobesplit80/20withtheStateofUtah.TheCounty’sportionofthiswouldhavebeen$80,000.DuetotheState’sfailuretoallocatetheirshareofthesemoniesinthe2017legislativesession,thisupgradeneededtobepostponeduntilJuly2018.Therefore,theCounty’sportionofthismoneycanbeusedtohelpdefraythe cost of the renovation. In preparing for the NextGen 911 operating server the CommunicationsLieutenantnegotiatedsubstantialsavingsontheproject.Theprojectfor2018willcost$260,000withtheCounty’s20%portionequaling$52,000.Othermoniesavailabletobeusedinclude:
Theincreaseintheprevious61centfund(nowthe71centfund).Thisadditionalmoneyonanannualbasisisapproximately$60,000;TheincreaseintheDPSContractis$26,589onanannualbasis;and UCARadioleaseservicechargesavingsrepresenta$60,000savingstotheCounty.
TherenovationoftheCommunicationsCenterwillbepaidwithnoadditionalimpacttotheexisting2017budget.If either agency decides to end this Service Agreement there is a 365 day notification clause. It willrequirethismuchtimetocreatebudgets,obtainequipment,andstaffanewcenter.2. ChartofPositionsWith the approval of the Service Agreement and prior to the subsequent hiring of five new FTEdispatcherstheCountyCouncilneedstoamendtheChartofPositions.ThiswillchangethecurrentChartof Positions from twelvedispatchers to seventeen, giving the Sheriff’sOffice a total of 107FTEs and1PTE.3. BudgetOfficerThe Council needs to notify the CountyBudgetOfficer, of the revenue and expenditure changes in the2017budget.Thesechangeswillrequirethebudgettobeopenedandamended.Thisneedstooccurpriortotheendofthisyear.OpeningthisbudgetcouldoccurinDecemberastheCouncillooksatotherrevenueandexpendituremodificationsforthecalendaryear2017budget.
61CentFund(now71Cent) $450,000.00 $510,000.00*DPSContract $87,000.00 $113,589.00*UCASavings $‐ $60,000.00**Projection
4
4. PublicSafetyCommunicationsCenterAdvisoryCouncilOneof themajor discussionpoints between thepartieswas the desire to have an appointedAdvisoryCounciltomakerecommendationstotheSheriffregardingtheCommunicationsCenter.TomFisher,SummitCountyManagerwillcreate,byExecutiveOrder,aSummitCountyCommunicationsCenterAdvisoryCouncilforthepurposesof:
1. Providingadvice to theSheriff onadministrative internalprotocols, policies and procedurespertainingtotheCommunicationsCenter,and2. Providinginformation,feedbackandrecommendationsastoadministrationissues (notincludingpersonnelactions)withregardtotheCommunicationsCenter,soas to assist the Sheriff in effectively and efficiently managing the law enforcement andemergencycommunicationneedsofSummitCounty.
TheAdvisoryCouncilmayconsistofuptoninemembersandmeetaminimumoftwiceayear.EachofthegovernmentalentitieswhichareservicedbytheCommunicationsCentermaynominateonepersontobeappointedtotheAdvisoryCouncil.TherewillbenotermlimitsformembersaslongastheyareemployedbytheparticipatingagencythatnominatedthemandtheagencystillparticipateswiththeSummitCountyCommunicationsCenter.ThepurposeoftheAdvisoryCouncilistoproviderecommendationstotheSheriffoninternaloperationalprotocols,policiesandprocedurespertainingtotheCommunicationsCenter,including,butnotlimitedto:
Policies for addressing conflicts among parties concerning the administration of theCommunicationsCenter;Theprocedureforreviewingandobtainingcopiesofdispatchrecordings;TheperformancemetricsfortheCommunicationsCenter;Training, retention and transition policies, to the extent the proposed policies do notconflictwithSummitCountypolicies;Technologychangesorimprovements;Feedbackmechanismsforcallroutingorcustomerconcerns;Feedback on personnel matters, but all personnel actions will be within the absolutediscretionoftheSheriff;andProviding advice to the Sheriff on capital expenditures that would require additionalfundingattheCommunicationsCenterinordertomaintainanappropriatelevelofservice.
C.RecommendationStaffrecommendstheCouncil: DirecttheCountyManagertoapprovetheServiceAgreementwithParkCityMunicipal; MaketherequiredchangestotheChartofPositions; GivedirectiontotheBudgetOfficeronthechangestheseactionswillmaketotherevenuesand expenditurestothe2017Budget,andrequirethebudgetbeopenedatalaterdatetomakethese changes;and Direct the County Manager to issue an Executive Order creating the Public Safety CommunicationsCenterAdvisoryCouncil.
1
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER SERVICE AGREEMENT
Between Summit County and Park City Municipal Corporation
Providing for Consolidated Dispatch Service in Summit County
THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT (hereinafter “Agreement”), is made and entered into this ____ day of
_____, 2017, (the “Effective Date”) by and between PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, a municipal
corporation of the State of Utah, whose address is 445 Marsac Avenue, Post Office Box 1480, Park City,
Utah (hereinafter “Park City”) and SUMMIT COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, whose
address is 60 N. Main Street, P.O. Box 128, Coalville, Utah 84017, (hereinafter “County”). Each is
individually referred to as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
WHEREAS, the County provides consolidated dispatch services for public safety providers
throughout Summit County; and,
WHEREAS, Park City has need of certain dispatch and communications services within the
Summit County area relating to its police and public safety operations; and,
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of consolidating and
coordinating dispatch and communications services within the Summit County area, and providing said
dispatch and communications services without regard to territorial boundaries, for the overall welfare
and benefit of all of the citizens within those geographical areas;
NOW THEREFORE, based upon the mutual promises and other good and satisfactory
consideration, the Parties contract and agree as follows:
1. NAME
The name of the communications center shall be the “Public Safety Communications
Center” so as to eliminate regional customer confusion for emergency and citizen
support.
2. RESPONSIBLITIES
a. The Public Safety Communications Center located at 6300 Justice Center Road, Park
City, Utah 84098 will provide emergency, public information, and customer service
communications, as well as dispatch services for public safety functions and serve as the
public safety answering point (PSAP) for 9‐1‐1 communications; and provide other such
emergency dispatch services as agreed upon by the Parties.
b. The administrator of the Public Safety Communications Center shall be the Summit
County Manager, who has delegated that duty to the Summit County Sheriff.
2
c. The Public Safety Communications Center shall provide continuous dispatch
operations and will be available twenty‐four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, to
answer all requests to/from public safety agencies or the public, and to dispatch the
appropriate agency and/or personnel.
d. The Public Safety Communications Center shall provide support for Park City’s
internal services. Such will include, but not be limited, to the following:
(i) Public Utilities and Transit Departments for issues related to safety
communications.
(ii) Water Department for after‐hours dispatching services.
(iii) During the winter months the Streets Department shall be provided
with call‐in support during all storms that enables seamless transition of crews without
interruption of service. Park City Transit service personnel may be used as observers
during emergency or crisis situations.
e. Park City shall provide updated Support Map and Contact Information for call
handling of citizen requests. County shall geo‐locate call requests and route/involve
appropriate agencies. Erroneous contact or mapping information shall be reported to
Park City as soon as possible.
3. ADVISORY COUNCIL
Summit County shall, by Executive Order, create an Advisory Council to serve in an
advisory capacity to the administrator of the Public Safety Communications Center. The
Advisory Council shall be formed within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date. .
4. PAYMENT
a. Summit County shall be responsible for managing collection, disbursement, and
accountability for funds collected through the 9‐1‐1 surcharge distributed by the Utah
Communication Authority (UCA).
b. Park City shall pay to the County the total gross sum of $108,350.00 within forty‐five
(45) days of the Effective Date of this Agreement for the purposes of equipment
upgrades and new console costs related to the expansion of the Public Safety
Communications Center (the “Capital Cost Fee”).
c. Park City shall not pay additional Capital Cost Fees unless agreed to in writing.
3
d. Park City shall pay to the County on an annual basis a fee based upon a formula
recognizing equipment expenditures and new budgeted full‐time employees to provide
the services set forth in Section 2 above (the “Dispatch Service Fee”).
(i) Park City shall pay as the Dispatch Service Fee to the County the gross
sum of $200,000.00 for dispatch services for the remainder of Calendar Budget Year
2017, which will be paid by Park City on or before December 31, 2017. A Calendar
Budget Year is defined as January 1 thru December 31 in any year.
(ii) In Calendar Budget Year 2018, the Dispatch Service Fee shall be
$600,000.00. Park City shall pay to the County that amount upon invoice in two equal
installments of $300,000.00 on July 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018.
(iii) As the Dispatch Service Fee for services rendered during the first six
months of Calendar Budget Year 2019, Park City shall pay to the County on or before
July 1, 2019, the gross sum of $300,000.00.
(iv) It is the intent of the Parties to enter into negotiations regarding the
Dispatch Service Fee for services rendered after June 30, 2019.
(v) In the event that the Parties are not able to reach an agreement on the
Dispatch Service Fee, as set forth in Section 4(d)(iv) above, the annualized base dispatch
service fee amount for purposes of this Agreement shall be $600,000.00 (the “Base
Amount”). Beginning on July 1, 2019, the Base Amount shall be automatically increased
for each succeeding Fiscal Budget Year to reflect the average annual percentage
increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, West Region, All Items,
as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (the “CPI”) for
the prior Fiscal Budget Year. A Fiscal Budget Year is defined as July 1 thru June 30 in any
year.
(vi) Park City shall send all payments to the County in care of the Summit
County Auditor, 60 N. Main Street, P.O. Box 128, Coalville, Utah 84017.
5. PERSONNEL
a. In order to provide Park City with the level of service necessary, Summit County
acknowledges and agrees that additional dispatch personnel will be necessary to fulfill
the terms of this Agreement. The cost of said additional personnel has been included in
Section 4 above. Therefore, Summit County shall make every reasonable effort to
budget, recruit and hire the necessary personnel consistent with this Agreement.
4
b. Summit County further agrees that a hiring preference shall be given to all otherwise
qualified applicants who have previously worked for Park City in a dispatch position and
that the initial compensation of those otherwise qualified applicants, if hired, shall be
comparable to their compensation while employed by Park City where possible.
6. TEMPORARY STAFFING INCREASES
Park City may recommend but not require temporary staff increases for special events
directly to the Summit County Sheriff.
7. EQUIPMENT
a. All equipment and supplies directly related to the Public Safety Communications
Center shall be under the control and inventory of Summit County.
b. Installation, maintenance, repair and changes of all equipment, radios, facilities, and
grounds shall be the responsibility of Summit County.
c. Summit County shall retain ownership of the E 9‐1‐1 emergency telephone
equipment, uninterruptible power supply, and annual maintenance for service, repair or
replacement of E9‐1‐1 equipment associated with E9‐1‐1 service.
8. TECHNOLOGY
a. Parties shall coordinate on fiber network connectivity, as soon as practical, taking into
consideration shared costs and use with secondary purposes such as Transit, EOC, and
Legal functions. The Parties agree to request funds to meet this objective.
b. Summit County, in consultation with Park City and other system users, shall develop
dispatch center technical standards for shared software and network services, to meet
the use of changing technologies and to support the display and access of cameras,
Access Controls and other feedback mechanisms to support first responders with critical
information.
c. Summit County, in consultation with Park City and other system users, shall address
technical relocation issues on a case‐by‐case basis.
d. Summit County, in consultation with Park City and other system users, shall establish
Service Level Agreements for equipment, software and performance for the purpose of
meeting response times for emergency calls and community services.
5
e. Summit County, in consultation with Park City and other system users, shall enter into
data sharing and access agreements for joint technologies, such as camera access and
Access Control, which would determine what facilities would be available for access, to
what level and how the data would be accessed and utilized. These agreements will
also include security requirements for users of the technologies.
f. Summit County, in consultation with Park City and other system users, shall
determine:
(i) the use of officer geo‐location services for deployment of nearest
resource to emergency requests; and
(ii) standards for using radio systems for joint communications with the
Park City Police Department and other business units of Park City, such as Public Works,
EOC, Water, and Streets.
g. Summit County, in consultation with Park City and other system users, shall
continually review and prioritize new technology.
h. Summit County, in consultation with Park City and other system users, shall use
software that best meets the needs of all users.
i. The Parties agree to share cybersecurity information, including information of possible
or actual attacks on systems used by both Parties.
j. Summit County shall assume financial responsibility of the Spillman CAD system. Such
responsibility includes software maintenance and server(s) hardware maintenance and
replacement.
k. Summit County shall develop and maintain an audio recording system of phone and
radio network which meets state and federal guidelines.
l. Summit County shall develop and maintain Instant Messages to the Spillman CAD
system in a manner which meets state and federal guidelines.
m. Summit County shall maintain accurate records associated with Park City resident’s
Alarm Bonds and provide reports, as requested, to Park City’s Finance Department to
fulfill these obligations.
n. Summit County shall train its personnel in software jointly used by the Parties and all
related security and confidentially requirements.
6
9. PUBLIC RELATIONS RESPONSES
Summit County shall consult with Park City on public relations responses to incidents
involving dispatch as it pertains to Park City.
10. ANNUAL MEETING BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION
At a minimum, the Parties shall meet annually to discuss any issues regarding this
Agreement. The Parties shall each designate a representative to meet, discuss and
resolve any dispute or problems arising from the performance of this Agreement.
11. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY
Each Party agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each other Party from and
against any claims, lawsuits, liability, damages, loss, costs or expense, including
attorney’s fees incurred as a result of bodily injury, death, personal injury or damage to
property caused by or arising out of the intentional, wrongful, or negligent acts or
omissions of the responsible Party. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, no Party
waives any defenses or immunity available under the Utah Governmental Immunity Act
(Chapter 63G‐7, Utah Code Annotated), nor does any Party waive any limits of liability
currently provided by the Utah Governmental Immunity Act.
12. NO WAIVER OF GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY and INSURANCE
Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver by any Party of any immunity provided by law
to such Party or an extension of any limits of liability applicable to such Party nor shall
this Agreement be construed as an agreement to indemnify, hold harmless, or in any
way to assume liability for personal injury, death or property damage caused by the
negligence of the other Party. Each Party agrees to make provision for insurance
coverage, through independent contact or self‐insurance, to meet such liability as may
be imposed upon it through statutory waiver of immunity or as otherwise provided by
law.
13. DURATION, MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION a. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall terminate on June 30, 2019, unless otherwise renewed by mutual agreement of the Parties for a term of no less than four (4) years. b. Notwithstanding Section 13(a) above, either Party may terminate this Agreement at an earlier date by providing at least three hundred and sixty‐five (365) days advanced written notice to the other Party.
7
c. Summit County shall provide a yearly summary of the “Cost Per Call” for all activity in
the Park City area. This report shall contain call details and distinguish between
administrative and emergency calls. This report shall also contain an overview of all
calls to the Public Safety Communications Center, broken out by entity (Park City Fire
Service District, Park City, Morgan County, etc.)
d. In the event of termination of this Agreement, Summit County agrees to facilitate the export of and migration of data; and assist with changes to technology services, systems, data circuits and any other shared services required for the separation of Park City from the Public Safety Communications Center. 14. NO SEPARATE ENTITY This Agreement is an agreement between Summit County and Park City, and does not create a separate legal or administrative entity, nor does it confer any third party rights or benefits on any other person or party, public or private. Both Parties are cooperating jointly together to exercise their individual powers and privileges. Nothing in this Agreement or its implementation is intended to restrict the legal authority of Summit County or Park City in any way. 15. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES There are no intended third party beneficiaries to this Agreement. It is expressly understood that enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and all rights of action relating to such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to the Parties, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right of action by any third person under this Agreement. It is the express intention of the Parties that any person, other than the Party who receives benefits under this Agreement, shall be deemed an incidental beneficiary only. 16. RESERVATION OF LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE POWERS The Parties recognize and agree that this Agreement does not obligate either Party to limit their legislative or executive powers with respect to any of the subject matter of this Agreement, other than those matters expressly stated in this Agreement. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and no statements, promises, or inducements made by any Party or agents of any Party that are not contained in this Agreement shall be binding or valid. Alterations, extensions, supplements or modifications to the terms of this Agreement shall be agreed to in writing by the Parties, incorporated as amendments to this Agreement, and made a part hereof. To the extent of any conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any later agreements, the later agreements shall be controlling.
8
18. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Agreement is construed or held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
19. AUTHORIZATION The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties confirm that they are duly authorized representatives of the Parties and are lawfully enabled to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Parties.
IN WITNESS WHEROF, the Parties have executed this instrument or caused it to be executed by their
representative duly authorized
PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Approved as to Form:
__________________________________ ____________________________
Diane Foster Mark Harrington
City Manager City Attorney
SUMMIT COUNTY Approved as to Form:
________________________ ____________________________
Thomas C. Fisher Margaret Olson
County Manager County Attorney
1
Executive Order No. 2017‐ 02
AN EXECUTIVE ORDER CREATING A PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER ADVISORY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, Summit County Code §1‐14‐10 (F) provides that the County Manager (“Manager”) is
vested with all administrative and executive powers except those reserved for independently elected
officials; and,
WHEREAS, the executive powers granted to the Manager include, without limitation, the power
to “[m]anage and direct the activities of Summit County in a manner, consistent with ordinance and this
plan, including the management and direction of departments, divisions, sections, activities or agencies
as now constituted or as may be created in the future . . . ;” and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to UCA §§17‐53‐301 and 302, the Manager has established a Public Safety
Communications Center (“Communications Center”) to provide communication services to law
enforcement and emergency responders; and,
WHEREAS, the Manager has delegated the authority to manage and operate the
Communications Center to the Summit County Sheriff (“Sheriff”); and,
WHEREAS, the Manager desires to create a Public Safety Communications Center Advisory
Council (“Advisory Council”) for the purposes of (1) providing advice to the Sheriff on administrative
internal protocols, policies and procedures pertaining to the Communications Center, and (2) providing
information, feedback and recommendations as to administration issues with regard to the
Communications Center, so as to assist the Sheriff in effectively and efficiently managing the emergency
communication needs of Summit County (“County”); and,
WHEREAS, the Manager finds that it is in the best interests of the County to create an Advisory
Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Thomas C. Fisher, Summit County Manager, do hereby create a PUBLIC
SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER ADVISORY COUNCIL.
Section 1. Purpose. The responsibilities and duties of the Public Safety Communications Center
Advisory Council (“Advisory Council”) shall be limited to the following:
1.1 Providing recommendations to the Sheriff on internal operational protocols, policies
and procedures pertaining to the Communications Center, including, but not limited to:
1.1.1 A policy for addressing conflicts among parties concerning the administration of
the Communications Center;
2
1.1.2 The procedure for reviewing and obtaining copies of dispatch recordings
(however, any GRAMA requests will be handled by the governmental entity in possession of the
records);
1.1.3 The performance metrics for the Communications Center, if necessary, and
based upon specific circumstances;
1.1.4 Training, retention and transition policies, to the extent the proposed policies
do not conflict with Summit County policies;
1.1.5 Technology changes or improvements, including the selection of the data base
to be used for emergency notifications;
1.1.6 Feedback mechanisms for call routing or customer concerns; and
1.1.7 Feedback on personnel matters. All personnel actions are within the absolute
discretion of the Sheriff. The Advisory Council shall have no authority with respect to personnel
actions.
1.2 Reviewing certification compliance, best practices and the adequacy of training
provided on the various systems that would affect customer service and providing
recommendations on such to the Sheriff.
1.3 Providing advice to the Sheriff on capital expenditures that would require additional
funding at the Communications Center in order to maintain an appropriate level of service.
Section 2. Appointment of Members. The Advisory Council may consist of up to nine (9) members
who shall be appointed by the County Manager (“Manager”). Each of the governmental entities which
are serviced by the Communications Center may nominate one person to be appointed by the Manager
to the Advisory Council. If the appointed member cannot attend, the governmental entity may send an
alternate person in place of the appointed member who shall have the same rights as the appointed
member.
Section 3. Term of Office. The term of each member of the Advisory Council shall not be limited.
Section 4. Compensation of Members. Members shall serve on a voluntary basis, without
compensation, except that mileage or other travel expenses associated with service may be reimbursed
by the County as part of the Sheriff’s budget.
Section 5. Officers.
5.1 Members shall annually elect a chair for a one year term (“Chair”).
5.2 In consultation with the Sheriff, the Chair shall prepare the Advisory Council’s agenda
for all meetings.
3
5.3 The Chair shall preside over and conduct all meetings and shall act as the representative
of the Advisory Council in all matters before the Sheriff.
Section 6. Meetings.
6.1 The Advisory Council shall meet at a minimum of two times annually unless otherwise
determined by the Chair in consultation with the Sheriff.
6.2 The Advisory Council shall be subject to the Utah Open Meetings Act, UCA Title 52,
Chapter 4 (the “Act”). The Sheriff shall provide all administrative staff in support of the Advisory
Council.
6.3 Executive closed sessions may be scheduled whenever the Chair deems such action
permissible under the Act, so long as the County Attorney concurs in such determination.
6.4 A majority of members shall constitute a quorum and the action of the majority of the
members present shall be the action of the Advisory Council. In circumstances where the
Advisory Council is providing a recommendation on the expenditure of public funds, only those
members whose governmental entities provide monetary remuneration to the County shall
have a vote.
Section 7. Term and Dissolution of the Advisory Council.
7.1 The Advisory Council shall run concurrently with the term of the Public Safety
Communications Center Service Agreement between Park City and Summit County.
Section 8. Conduct of Members.
8.1 Serve the Public Interest. The primary obligation of the Advisory Council and each member is to serve the public interest.
8.2 Recognize the Comprehensive and Long-Range Nature of Recommendations. The Advisory Council and its members shall continuously gather, consider and evaluate all relevant facts before making a recommendation to the Sheriff.
8.3 Avoid Conflicts of Interest. Members shall avoid personal conflicts of interest and the appearance of impropriety. A member with a potential personal conflict of interest shall abstain from voting on the matter and not participate in any deliberations on the matter. The member shall also not discuss the matter privately with any other member voting on the matter.
8.4 Render Thorough and Diligent Service. If a member has not sufficiently reviewed relevant facts affecting a recommendation, that member should not participate in the vote on that recommendation.
4
8.5 Not Seek or Offer Favors. A member must not directly or indirectly solicit any gift or accept or receive any gift (whether in money, services, loans, travel, entertainment, hospitality, promises, or in some other form) under circumstances in which it could be reasonably inferred that the gift was intended or could reasonably be expected to influence them in the performance of their duties or was intended as a reward for any vote on their part.
8.6 Not Disclose or Improperly Use Confidential Information for Financial Gain. A member shall not disclose or improperly use confidential information for financial gain, and must not disclose to others confidential information acquired in the course of their duties or use it to further a personal interest.
8.7 Maintain Public Confidence. A member must conduct himself/herself publicly so as to maintain public confidence in the Advisory Council, and the member’s performance of the public trust.
8.8 Respect for and Courtesy to other Members, Public and Staff. Each member has the same rights and privileges as any other member. Any member has the right to be heard and to hear what others have to say about items being considered by the Advisory Council.
Dated this ____ day of _________, 2017
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________ __________________________
Thomas C. Fisher Margaret Olson
County Manager County Attorney
