21. 11. 11 Tilly_trust_migration

8/3/2019 21. 11. 11 Tilly_trust_migration

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/21-11-11-tillytrustmigration 1/23

Trust Networks in Transnational MigrationAuthor(s): Charles TillySource: Sociological Forum, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Mar., 2007), pp. 3-24Published by: SpringerStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20110187 .

Accessed: 25/10/2011 07:56

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of

content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms

of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Sociological Forum.

http://www.jstor.org

http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20110187?origin=JSTOR-pdf

http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20110187?origin=JSTOR-pdf

http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer



Sociological Forum, Vol. 22, No. 1,March 2007 (? 2007)

DOI: 10.HH/j.1573-7861.2006.00002.x

Trust Networks in Transnational Migration

CharlesTilly1

The sheer volume of migrant remittances to relatively poor countries, inclu

ding those of Latin America and the Caribbean, nicely dramatizes the genu

inely transnational social ties created by long-distance migration. The

evidence underlines that migration flows are serious business, not only forthe individuals and families involved, but also for whole national economies.

Thinking about remittances also allows us to identify some crucial social

processes of which most migrants and first-hand students of migration are

well aware, but for which we have neither well-established theories, carefully

crafted concepts, nor extensive evidence. I mean the creation, use, and trans

formation of interpersonal trust networks within migration streams.

KEY WORDS: trust; networks; transnational; migration.

INTRODUCTION

My friend and former student Alex Juica migrated to New York City

from Huanuco, Peru, after a long intermediate stay in Lima. He tells vivid

tales of hisstruggles

to

get

an education in Peru, his achievement of an

economics Ph.D. in the United States, his appointment as an economic

affairs officer at the United Nations, and his efforts to help family

members both in Peru and in New York. Speaking of another Peruvian

immigrant he met inNew York, Alex reports that:

This paper revises my Mead Lecture, University of Connecticut, September 2005. I have

adapted a few paragraphs from Charles Tilly, Trust and Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni

versity Press, 2005, and a few other paragraphs from Viviana A. Zelizer and Charles Tilly,"Relations and Categories" pp. 225-255 in Arthur Markman and Brian Ross, eds., Cate

gories in Use. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Advances in Research and Theory,Volume

47,Amsterdam: Elsevier.

1Department of Sociology, Columbia University, 514 Fayerweather Hall, New York, New

York 10027-6902; e-mail: [email protected]

3

0884-8971/06/0300-0031/0 ? 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd



4 Tilly

Today I will send the remittance in kind to my mother, poor woman, she will be

needing it. 'La Cholita' would say, on one of the occasions on which she sent en

comiendas to her family. Even grandparents, who often had helped parents to raise

the kids, are subject to attention from Peruvian immigrants, who send them remit

tances when not sponsoring them to come to 'Los Estados Unidos.'

Alex continues:

Sometimes remittances flow the other way and parents use their skills to help their

grown children. For example, when parents who are construction workers might helpto build or improve their children's homes, either in Lima or inNew York City. Maria

invited her father to New York City on a tourist visa so that he could visit her and his

grandchildren but also assist in the construction of the sewage system for her new

house. 'Here it is different,' her father told me. 'The parts are generally plastic, not likein Peru, where they are usually metal. But some of the parts might be interchangeable,so I am taking a few back to Peru to use with my clients' (Juica, 2001:251).

In a recent talk, immigrant become migration analyst, Alex Juica pointsout that 75% of all remittances to Latin American and Caribbean countries

come from the United States, that the vast majority of recent migrants to

the United States from the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and Ecuador send

remittances regularly, and that undocumented migrants send remittances

more regularly than their documented paisanos (Juica, 2005).The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs for

which Alex works reports that during the 1990s remittances passed over

seas development assistance as a source of external funds for developing

countries; by the early twenty-first century officially counted remittances

alone were running about US$60 billion per year. Unofficially transmitted

money and goods surely added billions more. By 2004, remittances had

well surpassed international development assistance and started approach

ing foreign direct investment as sources of external financing in developingcountries. Officially counted worldwide remittance flows then amounted to

some US$182 billion, of which 69% went to developing countries. Infor

mal flows surely pushed the grand total of remittances well above foreigndirect investment itself in many poorer countries (Maimbo and Ratha,

2005:3-4). Remittances have sometimes amounted to more than 60% of

international monetary inflows to El Salvador and Nicaragua (United

Nations, 2004:106). In 2002, the roughly 27 billion dollars officially sent

to Latin America and the Caribbean accounted for about a fifth of the

world total of official remittances and equaled 1.6% of the entire region's

gross domestic product (United Nations, 2004:107).

The point of this article is not to bludgeon readers with statistics on

the economics and demography of transnational migration. I do mean,

however,to

challenge popular images of immigrantsas

one-way travelers,

desperate for work or welfare in a richer country, who cut home ties as

soon as possible in order to take advantage of their new country. The



Trust Networks in Transnational Migration 5

sheer volume of migrant remittances to relatively poor countries, including

those of Latin America and the Caribbean, nicely dramatizes the genu

inely transnational social ties created by long-distance migration. It under

lines that migration flows are serious business not only for the individuals

and families involved, but also for whole national economies.

Thinking about remittances also allows us to identify some crucial

social processes of which most migrants and first-hand students of migra

tion are well aware, but for which we have neither well established theor

ies, carefully crafted concepts, nor extensive evidence. I mean the creation,

use, and transformation of interpersonal trust networks within migration

streams. Trust networks play central parts in the organization, mainten

ance, and transformation of long-distance migration streams across much

of the world. Within them, remittance flows reinforce commitments

among all participants in the stream.

'Interpersonal trust networks' may strike you as amysterious

term.

Out of all the various networks that connect people, it helps to single out

those that involve unusual amounts of mutual trust. People rely especially

on those networks when they are carrying on long-term, crucial enterprises

such as procreation, child rearing, religious or political commitment, long

distancetrade, and,

of course,migration.

In thosenetworks,

members bet

valued outcomes on the likelihood that other people will meet their

responsibilities competently. Trust networks include some religious com

munities, political conspiracies, webs of ethnic traders, and kinship

groups. For thousands of years, trust networks have performedan enor

mous range of political, economic, and spiritual work for human beings,

especially those human beings who could not rely on governments to pro

vide them with sustaining services. But here we concentrate on trust net

works' place in long-distance migration.This brief essay can do no more than open the door on trust net

works and transnational migration. Here are the six main points:

1) Within the wide range of interpersonal networks that play some part in

long-distance migration, trust networks figure importantly in solidarity

between people at the origins and destinations of migration streams.

2) Members of such networks typically acquire long-term rights and obli

gations binding themselves to each other, which mean that the networks

operate simultaneously as sites of social insurance and of social control.

3) For that very reason, migration streams attached to trust networks

tend to concentrate in relatively specialized economic, geographic, and

social niches ascompared

with all streams ofmigration.

4) The operation of migrants' trust networks creates and depends on

boundaries that separate members from outsiders; as a result, membership



6 Tilly

inhibits assimilation of migrants at the destination and poses sharp choicesfor the second and later generations.

5) In the longer run, the survival of transnational trust networks throughthe second generation and beyond depends heavily on the social segregation or integration of the immigrant stream at the destination, whether

segregated through self-selection or exclusion, segregated immigrant com

munities more frequently maintain transnational trust networks.

6) That segregation, however, generally confines members of trust net

works to a relatively narrow range of opportunities for work, housing,

sociability, and welfare. If those opportunities connect members with rich

rewards, the network prospers. If not, it often suffers.

The Stakes of Trust Networks

Experts on migration will recognize immediately that these argumentsmix familiar facts with risky speculation. I hope they will stimulate discus

sion, criticism, research, and new reflection on fundamental social proces

ses, including the generation of trust. Many students of political processes,

including me,believe that

well-functioning democracy dependson substan

tial integration of interpersonal trust into public politics. If so, we are

talking not merely about the lives of migrants, but about the quality of

democratic life at large. As students of western democracies often fret

about the impact of recent immigration on public life, we touch a sensitive

junction between migration and politics.2What is trust? We can think of trust as an attitude or as a relation

ship with practices attached. For the purpose of studying migration, it

helps to concentrate on the relationship, leaving open what sorts of atti

tudes might motivate, complement, or result from a relationship of trust.

Labels such as kinsman, compadre, paisano, fellow believer, and comemberof a craft provide a first indication of a trust relationship. But we know a

trust relationship more surely by the practices of its participants: If youtrust me, do not just tell me so; let me take charge of your children's edu

cation, lend me your life's savings for investment, take medicines I give

you, or help me paint my house on the assumption that I will help you

2For networks in political processes, see Auyero, 2000; Bates et al, 1998; Bandelj, 2002;

Bandy and Smith, 2004; Bob, 2005; Cook, 2001; Davis et al, 2005; Diani, 1995, 2003;

Edelman, 1999, 2003; Elster, 1999; Elster et al., 1998; Farah, 2004; Forment, 2003; Fox,

1992, 1994, 1996; Gould, 1999, 2003; Keck and Sikkink, 1998, 2000; Knoke, 1990; Langman, 2005; Levi, 1997; Levi and Stoker, 2000; Ngai, 2004; Ostrom, 1990; 1998; Passy,

1998, 2001; Paxton, 1999, 2002; Raggio, 1990; Riles, 2000; Singerman, 1995, 2004; Skocpol,

2003; Skocpol and Fiorina, 1999; Solnick, 1998; Tarrow, 2005; Tilly, 2004, 2005a.




paint yours. If you do not trust me, prove it by doing none of these thingsand nothing like them.

Trust consists of placing valued outcomes at risk to others' malfea

sance, mistakes, or failures (Tilly, 2005a). Trust relationships include those

in which people regularly take such risks.3 Although some trust relation

ships remain purely dyadic, for the most part they operate within larger

networks of similar relationships. Trust networks, then, consist of ramified

interpersonal connections, consisting mainly of strong ties, within which peo

ple set valued, consequential, long-termresources and enterprises at risk to

the malfeasance, mistakes, orfailures of others.

How will we recognize a trust network when we encounter or enter

one? First, we will notice a number of people who are connected, directly or

indirectly, by similar ties; they form a network. Second, we will see that the

sheer existence of such a tie gives one member significant claims on the

attention or aid of another; the network consists of strong ties. Third, we

will discover that members of the network are collectively carrying on major

long-term enterprises such asprocreation, long-distance trade, workers'

mutual aid, practice of an underground religion, or, of course, maintenance

of a long-distance migration stream. Finally, we will learn that the configuration of ties within the network sets the collective

enterpriseat risk to the

malfeasance, mistakes, and failures of individual members.

Networks reach into every corner of social life (Watts, 2003, 2004).

Social networks include any set of similar connections among three or more

social sites. Connections include communication, mutual recognition, and

shared participation in some activity, flows of goods or services, transmis

sion of diseases, and other forms of consequential interaction. Network sites

may be individuals, but they can also be organizations, localities, or social

positions. A network of connections among people you do not know and

who mostly do not know each other brings you your morning newspaper.

Another transmits political information. Still others lend invisible structureto flows of money, disease, and linguistic innovation.

3For surveys of trust-sustaining practices, relations, and institutions, including their involve

ment in migration (whether or not the analysts themselves use the language of trust), see

Alapuro and Lonkila, 2004; Anderson, 1974; Anthony and Home, 2003; Bayon, 1999;

Besley, 1995; Biggart, 2001; Biggart and Castanias, 2001; Buchan et al, 2002; Burt and

Knez, 1995; Castren and Lonkila, 2004; Curtin, 1984; Darr, 2003; DiMaggio, 2001;

DiMaggio and Louch, 1998; Feige, 1997; Fontaine, 1993; Gambetta, 1993; Granovetter,

1995; Guinnane, 2005; Guiso et al, 2004; Haber et al, 2003; Havik, 1998; Heimer, 1985;

Landa, 1994; Ledeneva, 1998, 2004; Light and Bonacich, 1988; Lonkila, 1999a,b; Marqueset al, 2001; Morawska, 1985, 1996, 2003; Muldrew, 1993; 1998, 2001; Ostergren, 1988;

Pastor et al, 2002; Piipponen, 2004; Postel-Vinay, 1998; Powell, 1990; Powell and SmithDoerr, 1994; Raddon, 2003; Rotberg, 1999; Shapiro, 1987; Stark, 1995; Tilly, 1990, 1998;

Tsai, 2002; Uslaner, 2002; Warren, 1999; Weber and Carter, 2003; White, 2002; Wuthnow,

2004; Yamagishi and Yamagishi, 1994; Zelizer, 2004, 2005b.



8 Tilly

Although segments of such networks may overlap with or even constitute trust networks, taken as wholes they do not qualify as trust net

works. They do not qualify because their participants do not generally

place their major valued collective enterprises at risk to malfeasance, mis

takes, or failures by other members of the same networks. In that precise

sense, members do not trust each other. Most or all members of trust net

works, in contrast, place major valued collective enterprises such as the

preservation of their faith, placement of their children, provision for their

old age, and protection of personal secrets at risk to fellow members' mal

feasance, mistakes, or failures. Accordingly, trust networks constitute onlya tiny subset of all networks.

Over thousands of years, nevertheless, ordinary people have commit

ted their major energies and most precious resources to trust networks not

only migration streams, to be sure, but also religious solidarities, lineages,trade diasporas, patron-client chains, credit networks, societies of mutual

aid, youth groups, and some kinds of local communities. We participantsin kinship and other trust networks usually take them for granted. But

they pose important mysteries: How do they maintain cohesion, control,

and, yes, trust when their members spread out into worlds rich with other

opportunitiesand commitments?

Their limiting cases, isolated communes and religious communities,seem easier to explain because their very insulation from the world facili

tates continuous monitoring, mutual aid, reciprocity, trust, and barriers to

exit. But geographically dispersed trust networks somehow manage to pro

duce similar effects, if not usually at the emotional intensities of isolated

communities. Maintaining the boundary between "us" and "them" clearly

plays an important part in trust networks' continued operation (Tilly,

2005b).Trust networks figure in many migration streams, especially those

organized in continuous chains linking limited origins to limited destinations. In fact, chain-linked long-distance migration provides a privileged

laboratory for study of transformations in trust networks.4 Long-distance

migration poses serious risks. Those risks dispose potential migrants who

4Amuedo-Dorantes and Pozo, 2005; Bodnar, 1985; Borges, 2003; Conway and Cohen, 1998;Cordero-Guzm?n et al, 2001; Curran et al, 2005; Curran and Cope Saguy, 2001; Durand

et al, 1996; Le Espiritu, 2003; Fussell and Massey, 2004; de la Garza and Lindsay Lowell,

2002; Georges, 1990; Gordon, 2005; Grasmuck and Pessar, 1992; Green, 2002; Grimson,

1999; de Haas and Plug, 2006; Hagan and Rose Ebaugh, 2003; Heer, 1996; HodagneuSotelo and Avila, 2002; Hoerder and Page Moch, 1996; Kamphoefner, 1987; Kamphoefneret al, 1991; Kurien, 2002; Massey et al, 1998; McKeown, 2001; Meisch, 2002; Moch,

2003; Mooney, 2003; Parre?as, 2005a,b; Poros, 2001; Portes, 1995, 1996; Portes and Rumbaut, 1990, 2001; Roberts and Morris, 2003; Sanders, 2002; Singh, 2005; Smith, 2000, 2003,

2005; Tilly, 1990; 2000; VanWey, 2004; Vertovec, 2003; Waldinger, 1996; Waldinger and

Bozorgmehr, 1996; Winters et al, 2001.




do not have extensive professional connections or official sponsors to relyon members of their trust networks for information and advice. The same

risks inhibit potential migrants who lack the mediation of trust networks

from migrating at all. Instead of a broad distribution across destinations

as a function of economic opportunities at those destinations, chain

migration channels long-distance moves into a few origin-destination

streams; large numbers of people from the same village end up in the

same towns or urban neighborhoods thousands of miles away.

Networks persist in the process, but change structure and geographicdistribution. As participants generally rely on strong ties to others with

whom they are carrying on consequential long-term enterprises and pla

cing those enterprises at risk to the malfeasance, mistakes, or failures of

others, the networks in question commonly qualify as trust networks.

Chain migration organized around trust networks contributes to the "seg

mented assimilation" that Alejandro Portes and Rub?n Rumbaut see as

characteristic of recent migration to the United States (Portes and

Rumbaut, 1990).Without using the term, my former colleague Robert Smith has

amply documented the importance of trust networks in the connections

migrantsform between Mexican

villagesand New York

City.His 15

yearparticipant observation of the migration stream connecting the Puebla vil

lage, he calls Ticuani to mainly Mexican concentrations within New York

documents both creation of a far-reaching network of trust and deeptransformation of the network as a result of interaction among people

moving back and forth between the two locales (Smith, 2005). By now,

roughly 60% of all living people born in Ticuani live in the United States,

mostly inNew York (Smith, 2002:147). Many New York-based Ticuanen

ses, including those born in New York, actually returned frequently to

Mexico and spent significant portions of their time in Ticuani. Modest

incomes inNew York made it possible to cut fine figures inMexico.

Remittances within Trust Networks

At the same time, remittances from New York money earners to

Ticuanense relatives, building of vacation houses in Ticuani, participationof returning emigrants in public ceremonies, direct intervention of emi

grants (whether returned or not) in Ticuani politics, establishment of New

York-style youth gangs in Ticuani, and entrusting of New York-born chil

dren to their grandmothers inMexico all help transform social structures

connecting New York with Puebla. These changes have triple effects:



10 Tilly

Deeply altering the organization of power and wealth in Ticuani.

Reshaping the lives of Ticuanenses in both locales.

Creating a new transnational set of trust networks.

Without a continuous flow of earnings from mostly modest occupa

tions inNew York, the continuously changing system would collapse. But

fed by those resources and by new generations of migrants in both direc

tions, the process sustains boundaries between Ticuanenses and others,

shapes relations across those boundaries in both Mexico and the United

States, and increases the relative prominence of network segments closely

connected to the Ticuanense population in New York. In the mediumrun, then, the partial success of chain migration has reinforced the viabil

ity of trust networks at its core.

Smith objects strongly to analyses of transnational migration that

treat it primarily as an assault of globalization on receiving countries.

Instead, he insists on the degree to which continuous flows in both direc

tions transform sending communities as well as connections between ori

gin and destination. He also stresses the importance of descending from

the national to the local level. As he declares,

Transnational life if lived, in intimate experience, not as 'transcendence' of

national borders but, rather, as a maintenance of links between one's own or one's

parents' hometown, and what it comes to represent, via concrete practices or com

mon imaginings. These evolve, like all cultural practices, in relation to their chan

ging material and institutional contexts. Transnational practices and institutions

are thus, in the proximate sense, products of other locally lived processes and cus

toms. In the cases I have studied, transnational life is both quotidian?mailing or

receiving remittances or phone calls?and also dramatic, attending feasts and dan

ces and fighting in the hometown, building a school in the hometown, and

demanding recognition and political power from hometown authorities (Smith,

2000:205).

Smith shows, among other things, that a hometown association oper

ating from New York City regularly intervenes in Ticuani's local affairs tothe extent of financing the water supply and backing candidates for publicoffice.

Since the 1970s, in fact, many Ticuanense New Yorkers fulfill their

village work obligations, or faenas, by means of financial contributions

channeled to Mexico through a powerful New York-based committee of

emigrants. Smith tells the story of accompanying committee members to

JFK airport in 1993 as they went off to consult with Ticuani authorities

and contractors about a new water system for the village. For this, he

reports,

the largest Ticuani project ever, the Committee raised more than two-thirds of the

$ 150,000 cost of the project, exceeding the Mexican federal, state, and local contri

butions combined. The Committee has also become involved in Ticuani politics




helping to fashion a set of rules and practices for participating in transnational

public life. Fund raising in New York by Ticuanenses has become increasingly

important in Ticuani electoral politics (Smith, 2005:3).

In New York, the Committee had assessed each household in New

York or Ticuani it judged able to pay a $300 tax they called a "cooper

ation," threatening delinquents that their Ticuani houses would not

receive water; almost everyone paid, regardless of how long they had been

away from Ticuani (Smith, 2000:212). By competing with local Mexican

authorities, the New York Committee's activity was undermining the old

structure of local power. It was also converting a segment of the migra

tion-formed trust network into a transnational political institution.

Members of the second generation born in New York, Smith reports,

also maintain contact with Ticuani, with the young men importing New

York street gang styles, getting respect they cannot command in New

York, and adopting macho manners in the village their sisters and

girlfriends do not tolerate in New York. Nevertheless, on the average

second- and third-generation Ticuanenses establish far broader connec

tions outside the hometown community than did their first-generation

forebears (Smith, 2002).

In the

longerrun, we can

speculate

that further New York success of

Mexican emigrants will increase differentiation within the network,

enhance involvement of New York emigrants in competing projects,

reduce the average commitment of emigrants and their offspring to enter

prises operating in Ticuani, and thereby undermine the system. They will

probably multiply external connections with different segments of the

migrant population, erode the group boundary, reduce collective control

over means of sustenance, and fragment internal relations. So far, how

ever, Ticuanense transnational trust networks remain viable.

Similarly, Sarah Mahler's ethnographic study of migration between El

Salvador and New York's Long Island suburbs documents the profoundeffect of remittances on sending communities, maintenance of transnational

ties into the second generation, the frequent care of U.S. born children by

their relatives in El Salvador, and the investment of people at both ends of

the migration stream in maintaining their trust network. More numerous

than permanent return migrants, Mahler reports that Salvadorans:

Are who enjoy legal immigrant status in the United States and who return for

family and community events, such as marriages, baptisms, funerals, and village

festivals. Increasingly visible are older returning migrants, generally men in their

forties to sixties who fled El Salvador during the war, leaving behind their spouses

and young children. With limited education and skills for advancing economicallyon Long Island, many of these men desired to return home?indeed their families

begged them to return?but the families had also grown too dependent upon

remittance income to forsake migration altogether. So, before returning, migrants



12 Tilly

first sponsor the migration of at least one child, grooming him or her in the basicsof migrant life?housing and job. The children ensure that remittances will con

tinue to flow homeward, cash that even highly self-sufficient farmers need to purchase fertilizers and pay for clothing, medical care, and so on (Mahler, 2001a:

120-121; see also Mahler, 2001b; for the terrible toll of the Salvadoran civil war,see Brockett, 2005; Wood, 2003).

While inNew York, moreover, Salvadoran immigrants maintain con

tinuous contact with their places of origin by means of letters, dollar

remittances, and gifts that flow in both directions. Specialized viajeroswho travel frequently between the two countries, Mahler reports, play cru

cial parts in

moving goods,money, and information between

Long

Island

and El Salvador (Mahler, 2001a: 117). Salvadorans' reliance on those inter

mediaries indicates that they connect via a trust network with the capacityto limit malfeasance, mistakes, and failures.

Clearly such trust networks go beyond simple means-end instrumental

ism. They engage their members in webs of rights and obligations. Unlike

the short-term contract with Western Union for the transmission of funds

from New York to a Salvadoran village, relations with a viajero typicallylast from one trip to the next. More important, they articulate with larger,

longer-lasting networks of social insurance and social control, especially ties

among kin and friends at both ends of the migration stream.Based on interviews with Hispanic migrants to Miami and Los Ange

les in 2002, a Pew Hispanic Center study documents the centrality of

remittances to connections between sending and receiving communities.

Almost all respondents reported sending remittances to support families

back home. Most gave remittances priority over their bills and expenses in

the United States. "Before anything," Mexican emigrant respondentMarisela remarked, "I send them the money because they count on it.

Then afterwards I pay the bills, my rent, but the first thing I do is send

it" (Suro et al, 2002:7).

When it came to basic family expenses back home, most migrants left

budgetary control to their families. A Mexican emigrant, Eduardo, told

interviewers:

One part is for savings, the other part for the primary necessities like education. It

depends on my wife and the priorities she has. So I go ahead and send the money,

and it just goes where she uses it (Suro et al, 2002:8).

When it came to investments such as buying land, however, remitting

emigrants exercised extensive control over the money; they negotiated

binding earmarks with their families in the home community. Each of

these arrangements clearly involves mental accounting. In each, earmark

ing concerns budgeting of remitted funds into distinct categories of legitimate expenditure.




Latin American migrants to the United States commonly use wireservices to transmit money back home. A simple search of almost any

American city's Latin American neighborhoods for stores with env

?os?remittances?among their advertised wares will verify the importance

of wire services. Many migrants also use couriers (often known as viajeros

or travelers) to carry money and other valuables. Finally, migrants who

return home for visits regularly carry not only money but also other gifts

including household appliances. Anyone who has ever taken an inexpen

sive flight from a U.S. airport to the Caribbean or Latin America can tes

tify to the importance of hand-carried remittances.

To be sure, all such remittance relations mix good will with extensive

obligation. Relations between emigrants and households at the origin pro

vide mutual support, as well as reinforcing the migrants' longer-term

claims on membership in the sending community. Earmarked remittances

buttress the crucial relations as they assert the senders' power over those

relations. The boundary between faithful remitters and defaulters divides

upstanding family members from dishonorable exiles, but it also separates

households that regularly receive support of their migrant members from

less fortunate households at the origin.

Reportingon his extensive fieldwork in the Caribbean island of

Montserrat as well as in London, Stuart Philpott describes a powerful sys

tem of informal controls over remittances from migrants in Great Britain.

He remarks,

Children are impressed with the behavior expected from the migrants from a

fairly early age. These expectations are implicitly taught in the home through the

praise of migrants who send remittances and through the condemnation of the

'worthless-minded' kin who do not 'notice their families.' Stories such as one

about the migrant who returned from America with 32 trunk loads of gifts for

distribution to his family and friends and another about a woman who literallysent her brother a car from America in the days when the only other cars were

owned by the wealthiest estate owners have virtually become moral precepts

(Philpott, 1968:468).

Philpott documents children's trips to the post office in hopes of

retrieving money-bearing letters, children's visions of the future in which

they emigrate and send back support for their families, complex alloca

tions of money received among family members, reciprocity by sending of

homegrown products back to Britain, black magic employed to coerce

reluctant remitters, in short, a large array of controls backing up the gen

eral understanding that honorable emigrants meet their obligations to

family and friends by means of remittances. The obvious consequence:

Division of emigrants into the two categories of honorable and dishonora

ble (see also Roberts and Morris, 2003).



14 Tilly

At the United States end, such trust networks offer connections with

jobs, housing, sociability, and care all crucial forms of insurance for highrisk migrants. At the Latin American end, they offer opportunities to

return home after a U.S. stint, to receive respect that runs very short in

New York or Los Angeles, to secure care for young children born in the

United States, and to integrate older versions of the same children into

the rituals, routines, language, and interpersonal ties of the home culture

(Hodagneu-Sotelo, 2001; Hodagneu-Sotelo and Avila, 2002; Levitt,

2001a,b, 2004; Menjivar, 2000, 2002). All this depends on rights and reci

procity over the longer term.

Trust Networks as Obligation and Constraint

At the same time, membership in trust networks imposes stringent

obligations. If you fail to help new arrivals in the United States, default in

your sending of promised remittances, or neglect fellow members of the

migrant stream in favor of newfound American friends, you are likely to

find yourself criticized or shunned. In trust networks, criticism and shun

ning regularly signalthat if a

waywardmember does not

reform,she will

lose access to the social insurance ordinarily provided by the network.

Some of the strife and misunderstanding between first and second generations stems precisely from the attempt of older members to keep youngsters

within the web of mutual obligation. But differences by gender also arise,for example as wives discover that they actually enjoy the marital leveragethat employment and city life give them, while their husbands resist the

loss of their macho authority (Grasmuck and Pessar, 1992; Hirsch, 2003).Members of migrant trust networks reinforce the rights and obliga

tions built into those networks by traveling recurrently in both directions.

As a result, ideas, practices, and symbols also flow between the UnitedStates and Latin America. Peggy Levitt describes the circulation of U.S.

cultural artifacts between Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, and the Domin

ican town she calls Miraflores from which a nucleus of Jamaica Plain

Dominicans migrated:

In Miraflores, villagers often dress in T-shirts emblazoned with the names of busi

nesses in Massachusetts, although they do not know what these words or logosmean. They proudly serve their visitors coffee with Cremora and juice made from

Tang (Levitt, 2001a:2).

But, so to speak, these artifacts aremerely the cream on the coffee.

They register the regularity of contact within migrant networks. The same

Dominican villagers who display Boston-area gear also take care of the




emigrants' children, handle local business for them, and arrange lodgingand entertainment for them when they return to the Dominican Republic.

Back in the United States, membership in trust networks facilitates

immigrants' lives in some regards, but it also tends to confine them to

niches created and inhabited by other immigrants. Even in the market-dom

inated U.S., most people acquire jobs, housing, and major consumer goods

through personal contacts (DiMaggio and Louch, 1998; Smith-Doerr and

Powell, 2005; Tilly, 1998; Tilly and Tilly, 1998; Chapter 9, Zelizer, 2005).

If you live in a constricted network, your contacts confine you to a

limited range of opportunities. Patricia Fern?ndez Kelly and Richard

Schauffler describe the plight of a San Diego family from Michoacan,

Mexico, the Mendozas. The family had entered the United States in a car

trunk 14 years earlier but had since become legal residents in an amnesty

program. Fern?ndez Kelly and Schauffler report:

For the past 10 years, Mr. Mendoza has worked as a busboy in a fancy restaurant

that caters to tourists, a position he secured through a Mexican friend. He is a

hardworking and modest man who wants his son, Carlos, to study so that he can

get a good job: '(I want him) to be better than me, not for my sake but for his

sake and that of his own family.' Mrs. Mendoza irons clothes at a Chinese-owned

laundry and complains bitterly that her employers are prejudiced toward her and

other Mexicans.

Carlos is doing well in school; he was the only boy at Cabrillo junior

high to be elected to the honor society last year. He wants to become an

engineer and go back toMexico. Life in San Diego has been hard on him;

the gold chain his parents gave him as a gift was ripped from around his

neck by neighborhood toughs; his bicycle remains locked up inside the

house, because riding it would mean losing it to the same local bullies. His

younger sister, Amelia, is not doing as well in school and dresses like a chola

(female gang member), although she insists it is only for the style. Her parents worry but feel helpless (Fern?ndez Kelly and Schauffler, 1996:38).

This account does not tell us, of course, to what extent the Mendozas

have maintained their membership in the trust network that brought them

to the United States. But the family's limited opportunities and precarioussurvival in San Diego clearly depend in part on the narrowness of their

current networks. Even today, we affluent Americans areunsurprised

when we notice that the busboys in a fancy restaurant are Mexican, but

impressed when the waiter or waitress turns out to come from Mexico.

Niches based on trust networks help immigrants locate themselves in a

new land, all right. But they also channel opportunities into a relativelynarrow range. If the

opportunities

include access to

capital,advanced edu

cation, or stardom, network members often do well. If they concentrate in

low-wage labor, network members suffer the consequences.



16 Tilly

Precisely because they are shielding serious long-term enterprises simul

taneously from external pr?dation and internal failures, trust networks

always erect tougher, sharper us them boundaries than the blurred edges of

friendship and neighborhood. All such boundaries produce sharp implicit

choices. On one side of the boundary lie security, solidarity, mutual aid, and

restricted opportunity. On the other side beckon new opportunities, more

extensive connections, and escapes from tyranny. Those who stick faithfully

within trust networks generally reach new opportunities, fresh connections,

and personal independence more rarely and slowly. They also suffer more

acutely from shunning and expulsion when those punishments occur.

Whether trust networks retain their vigor into the second and later

generations depends on the extent to which members of those generations

continue to gain from membership. If the networks adapt, incorporatenew connections, and facilitate members' opportunities at the migrant

stream's destination, they more frequently survive and prosper. If they do

not adapt, incorporate new connections, and facilitate members' oppor

tunities at the destination, then transnational ties decline in the long run.

Whether they survive or not, nevertheless, trust networks shape the lives

of successive immigrant generations.Here is another

wayof

putting mymain

point: By sniffingout the

operation of trust networks, students of Latin American migration to and

from North America have a splendid opportunity to illuminate fundamen

tal social processes that go on throughout the world.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I am grateful to Alex Juica, Viviana Zelizer, and a delightful Storrs,

Connecticut Latin American Studies audience for vetting of previous

drafts.

REFERENCES

Alapuro, Risto, and Markku Lonkila. 2004. "Russians' and Estonians' Networks in a

Tallinn Factory," In Alapuro Risto, Liikanen Ilkka and Lonkila Markku (eds.), Beyond

Post-Soviet Transition. Micro Perspectives on Challenge and Survival in Russia and Estoni:

101-127. Saarij?rvi: Kikimora Publications.

Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina, and Susan Pozo. 2005. "On the Use of Differing Money Trans

mission Methods by Mexican Immigrants," International Migration Review 39: 554-576.

Anderson, Grace M. 1974. Networks of Contact: The Portuguese and Toronto. Waterloo,

Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Publications.

Anthony, Denise, and Christine Horne. 2003. "Gender and Cooperation: Explaining Loan

Repayment inMicro-Credit Groups," Social Psychology Quarterly 66: 293-302.




Auyero, Javier. 2000. Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy ofEvita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Bandelj, Nina. 2002. "Embedded Economies: Social Relations as Determinants of ForeignDirect Investment in Central and Eastern Europe," Social Forces 81: 411-444.

Bandy, Joe, and Jackie Smith. 2004. "Factors Affecting Conflict and Cooperation in Trans

national Movement Networks," In Bandy Joe and Smith Jackie (eds.), Coalitions across

Borders. Transnational Protest and the Neoliberal Order. 231-252. Lanham, MD: Rowman

and Littlefield.

Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Wein

gast. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bayon, Denis. 1999. Les S.E.L., "Syst?mes d'?changes locaux". Pour un vrai d?bat. Levallois

Perret: Yves Michel.

Besley, Timothy. 1995. "Nonmarket Institutions for Credit and Risk Sharing in Low-Income

Countries," Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 169-188.

Biggart, Nicole Woolsey. 2001. "Banking on Each Other: The Situational Logic of Rotating

Savings and Credit Associations," Advances in Qualitative Organization Research 3: 129

153.

Biggart, Nicole Woolsey, and Richard P. Castanias. 2001. "Collateralized Social Relations:

The Social in Economic Calculation," American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60:

471-500.

Bob, Clifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion. Insurgents, Media, and International

Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bodnar, John. 1985. The Transplanted. A History of Immigrants in Urban America. Bloom

ington, IA: Indiana University Press.

Borges, Marcelo J. 2003. "Network Migration, Marriage Patterns, and Adaptation in Rural

Portugal and among Portuguese Immigrants in Argentina, 1870-1980," History of the

Family 8: 445-479.Brockett, Charles D. 2005. Political Movements and Violence in Central America. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Buchan, Nancy R., Rachel T.A. Croson, and Robyn M. Dawes. 2002. "Swift Neighbors and

Persistent Strangers: A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Trust and Reciprocity in Social

Exchange," American Journal of Sociology 108: 168-206.

Burt, Ronald S., and Marc Knez. 1995. "Kinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust," Rationalityand Society 7: 255-292.

Castren, Anna-Maija, and Markku Lonkila. 2004. "Friendship in Finland and Russia

from a Micro Perspective," In Castren Anna-Maija, Lonkila Markku and Peltonen

Matti (eds.), Between Sociology and History. Essays on Microhistory, Collective Action,

and Nation-Building: 162-176. Helsinki: SKS/Finnish Literature Society.

Conway, Dennis, and Jeffrey H. Cohen. 1998. "Consequences of Migration and Remittances

for Mexican Transnational Communities," Economic Geography 74: 25^14.Cook, Karen S.(ed.) 2001. Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Cordero-Guzm?n, H?ctor R., Robert C. Smith, and Ram?n Grosfoguel (eds.). 2001. Migra

tion, Transnationalization, and Race in a Changing New York. Philadelphia: Temple Uni

versity Press.

Curran, Sara R., and Abigail Cope Saguy. 2001. "Migration and Cultural Change: A Role

for Gender and Social Networks?" Journal for International Women's Studies 2: 54-77.

Curran, Sara R., Filiz Garip, Chang Y. Chung, and Kanchana Tangchonlatip. 2005. "Gen

dered Migrant Social Capital: Evidence from Thailand," Social Forces 84: 226-255.

Curtin, Philip D. 1984. Cross-Cultural Trade in World History. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni

versity Press.

Darr, Asaf. 2003. "Gifting Practices and Interorganizational Relations: Constructing Obligation Networks in the Electronics Sector," Sociological Forum 18: 31-51.

Davis, Gerald F., Doug McAdam, W. Richard Scott, and Mayer N. Zald (eds.). 2005. SocialMovements and Organization Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.



18 Tilly

Diani, Mario. 1995. Green Networks. A Structural Analysis of the Italian Environmental

Movement. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Diani, Mario. 2003. "Introduction: Social Movements, Contentious Actions, and Social Net

works: 'From Metaphor to Substance'?" In Diani Mario and McAdam Doug (eds.),

Social Movements and Networks. Relational Approaches to Collective Action: 1-20. Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

DiMaggio, Paul (ed.). 2001. The Twenty-First Century Firm. Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

DiMaggio, Paul, and Hugh Louch. 1998. "Socially Embedded Consumer Transactions: For

What Kinds of Purchases Do People Most Often Use Networks?" American SociologicalReview 63: 619-637.

Durand, Jorge, Emilio A. Parrado, and Douglas S. Massey. 1996. "Migradollars and Devel

opment: A Reconsideration of the Mexican Case," International Migration Review 30:

423^44.

Edelman, Marc. 1999. Peasants against Globalization. Rural Social Movements in Costa Rica.

Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Edelman, Marc. 2003. "Transnational Peasant and Farmer Movements and Networks," In

Kaldor Mary, Anheier Helmut and Glasius Marlies (eds.), Global Civil Society 2003: 185

220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elster, Jon. 1999. Alchemists of the Mind. Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cam

bridge University Press.

Elster, Jon, Claus Offe, and Ulrich K. Preuss. 1998 Institutional Design in Post-Communist

Societies. Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Farah, Douglas. 2004. Blood from Stones. The Secret Financial Network of Terror. New

York: Broadway Books.

Feige, Edgar. 1997. "Underground Activity and Institutional Change: Productive, Protective,

and Predatory Behavior in Transition Economies," In Nelson Joan, Tilly Charles and

Walker Lee (eds.), Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies: 21-34. Washington,DC: National Academy Press.

Fern?ndez Kelly, M. Patricia, and Richard Schauffler. 1996. "Divided Fates: ImmigrantChildren and the New Assimilation," In Portes Alejandro (ed), The New Second Genera

tion: 30-53. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Fontaine, Laurence. 1993. Histoire du colportage en Europe Xve-XIXe si?cle. Paris: Albin Mi

chel.

Forment, Carlos A. 2003. Democracy in Latin America 1760-1900. Volume I: Civic Selfhoodand Public Life inMexico and Peru. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fox, Jonathan. 1992. The Politics of Food inMexico. State Power and Social Mobilization.

Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Fox, Jonathan. 1994. "The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons

from Mexico," World Politics 46: 151-184.

Fox, Jonathan. 1996. "How does Civil Society Thicken? The Political Construction of Social

Capital in Rural Mexico," World Development 24: 1089-1103.

Fussell, Elizabeth, and Douglas S. Massey. 2004. "The Limits to Cumulative Causation:

International Migration from Mexican Urban Areas," Demography 41: 151-171.

Gambetta, Diego. 1993. The Sicilian Mafia. The Business of Private Protection. Cambridge,

MA: Harvard University Press.

de la Garza, Rodolfo O., and Briant Lindsay Lowell. 2002. Sending Money Home. HispanicRemittances and Community Development. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Georges, Eugenia. 1990. The Making of a Transnational Community. New York: Columbia

University Press.

Gordon, Wendy M. 2005. "What, I Pray You, Shall IDo with the Balance?: Single Women's

Economy of Migration," International Review of Social History 50: 53-70.

Gould, Roger V. 1999. "Collective Violence and Group Solidarity: Evidence from a Feuding

Society," American Sociological Review 64: 356-380.




Gould, Roger V. 2003. Collision of Wills. How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict.

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Granovetter, Mark. 1995. "The Economic Sociology of Firms and Entrepreneurs," In Portes

Alejandro (ed), The Economic Sociology of Immigration. Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and

Entrepreneurship: 128-165. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Grasmuck, Sherri, and Patricia R. Pessar. 1992. Between Two Islands. Dominican Interna

tional Migration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Green, Nancy L. 2002. Repenser les migrations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Grimson, Alejandro. 1999. Relatos de la diferencia y la igualdad. Los bolivianos en Buenos

Aires. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires.

Guinnane, Timothy W. 2005. "Trust: A Concept too Many," Jahrbuch f?r Wir

tschaftsgeschichte 2005 Part I: 77-92.

Guiso, Luigi, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales. 2004. "The Role of Social Capital in

Financial Development," American Economic Review 94: 526-556.de Haas, Hein, and Roald Plug. 2006. "Cherishing the Goose with the Golden Eggs: Trends

in Migrant Remittances from Europe to Morocco 1970-2004," International MigrationReview 40: 603-634.

Haber, Stephen, Armando Razo, and Noel Maurer. 2003. The Politics of Property Rights.Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth inMexico, 1876-1929.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hagan, Jacqueline, and Helen Rose Ebaugh. 2003. "Calling upon the Sacred; Migrants' Use

of Religion in the Migration Process," International Migration Review 37: 1145-1162.

Havik, Philip J. 1998. "Female Entrepreneurship in a Changing Environment: Gender, Kin

ship and Trade in the Guinea Bissau Region," In Risseeuw Carla and Ganesh Kamala

(eds.), Negotiation and Social Space. A Gendered Analysis of Changing Kin and SecurityNetworks in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa: 205-225. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira

Press.Heer, David M. 1996. Immigration in America's Future. Social Science Findings and the Pol

icy Debate. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Heimer, Carol A. 1985. Reactive Risk and Rational Action: Managing Moral Hazard in Insur

ance Contracts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Hirsch, Jennifer S. 2003. A Courtship after Marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California

Press.

Hodagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 2001. Domestica. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Hodagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette, and Ernestine Avila. 2002. "I'm Here but I'm There: The Mean

ings of Transnational Motherhood," In Gerstel Naomi, Clawson Dan and Zussman Rob

ert (eds.), Families at Work: Expanding the Boundaries. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt

University Press.

Hoerder, Dirk, and Leslie Page Moch. 1996. (eds.), European Migrants. Global and Local

Perspectives. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Juica, Alex. 2001. "Peruvian Networks for Migration in New York City's Labor Market,

1970-1996," In H?ctor R. Cordero-Guzm?n, Robert C. Smith and Grosfoguel Ram?n

(eds.), Migration, Transnationalization, and Race in a Changing New York: 239-257.

Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Juica, Alex. 2005. "Are Remittances Expectations Motivating Migration!" Unpublished Lec

ture, United Nations, New York.

Kamphoefner, Walter D. 1987. The Westfalians. From Germany toMissouri. Princeton, NJ:

Princeton University Press.

Kamphoefner, Walter D., Wolfgang Helbich, and Ulrike Sommer, (eds.). 1991. News fromthe Land of Freedom. German Immigrants Write Home. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University

Press.

Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in

International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2000. "Historical Precursors to Modern Transna

tional Social Movements and Networks," In John A. Guidry, Michael D. Kennedy



20 Tilly

and Mayer N. Zald (eds.), Globalizations and Social Movements. Culture, Power, andthe Transnational Public Sphere: Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Knoke, David. 1990. Political Networks. The Structural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Kurien, Prema A. 2002. Kaleidoscopic Ethnicity. International Migration and the Reconstruc

tion of Community Identities in India. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Landa, Janet Tai. 1994. Trust, Ethnicity, and Identity. Beyond the New Institutional Econom

ics of Ethnic Trading Networks, Contract Law, and Gift-Exchange. Ann Arbor, MI: Uni

versity of Michigan Press.

Langman, Lauren. 2005. "From Virtual Public Spheres to Global Justice: A Critical Theoryof Internetworked Social Movements," Sociological Theory 23: 42-74.

Le Espiritu, Yen. 2003. Home Bound. Filipino American Lives across Cultures, Communities,

and Countries. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Ledeneva, Alena. 1998. Russia's Economy of Favours. Blat, Networking, and Informal

Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ledeneva, Alena. 2004. "Genealogy of krugovaya poruka: Forced Trust as a Feature of

Russian Political Culture," Proceedings of the British Academy 123: 85-108.

Levi, Margaret. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Levi, Margaret, and Laura Stoker. 2000. "Political Trust and Trustworthiness," Annual

Review of Political Science 3: 475-508.

Levitt, Peggy. 2001a. The Transnational Villagers. Berkeley, CA: University of California

Press.

Levitt, Peggy. 2001b. "Transnational Migration: Taking Stock and Future Directions," Global

Networks 1: 195-216.

Levitt, Peggy. 2004. "Salsa and Ketchup: Transnational Migrants Straddle Two Worlds,"

Contexts 3: 20-26.

Light, Ivan, and Edna Bonacich. 1988. Immigrant Entrepreneurs. Koreans in Los Ange

les,~ 1965-1982. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Lonkila, Markku. 1999a. Social Networks in Post-Soviet Russia. Helsinki: Kikimora Publica

tions.

Lonkila, Markku. 1999b. "Post-Soviet Russia: A Society of Networks?" In KangaspuroMarkku (ed.), Russia: More Different than Most. Helsinki: Kikimora Publications.

Mahler, Sarah J. 2001a. "Suburban Transnational Migrants: Long Island's Salvadorans," In

H?ctor R. Cordero-Guzm?n, Robert C. Smith and Grosfoguel Ram?n (eds.), Migration,

Transnationalization, and Race in a Changing New York: 258-278. Philadelphia: Temple

University Press.

Mahler, Sarah J. 2001b. "Transnational Relationships: The Struggle to Communicate across

Borders," Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 1: 583-619.

Maimbo, Samuel Munzele, and Dilip Ratha. 2005. "Remittances: An Overview," In MunzeleMaimbo Samuel and Rathe Dilip (eds.), Remittances. Development Impact and Future

Prospects: 1-16. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Marques, M. Margarida, Rui Santos, and Fernanda Araujo. 2001. "Ariadne's Thread: CapeVerdean Women in Transnational Webs," Global Networks 1: 283-306.

Massey, Douglas S., Joaqu?n Arango, Graeme Hugo, Ali Kouaouci, Adela Pellegrino, and

J. Edward Taylor. 1998. Worlds inMotion. Understanding International Migration at the

End of theMillennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

McKeown, Adam. 2001. Chinese Migrant Networks and Cultural Change. Peru, Chicago,

Hawaii, 1900-1936. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Meisch, Lynn A. 2002. Andean Entrepreneurs. Otavalo Merchants and Musicians in the Global

Arena. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Menjivar, Cecilia. 2000. Fragmented Ties. Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America. Berke

ley, CA: University of California Press.

Menjivar, Cecilia. 2002. "The Ties that Heal: Guatemalan Immigrant Women's Networks

and Medical Treatment," International Migration Review 36: 437-466.




Moch, Leslie Page. 2003. Moving Europeans: Migration in Western Europe Since 1650. 2ndedn. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Mooney, Margarita. 2003. "Migrants' Social Ties in the U.S. and Investment in Mexico,"

Social Forces 81: 1147-1170.

Morawska, Ewa. 1985. For Bread with Butter. Life-Worlds of East Central Europeans in

Johnstown, Pennsylvania, 1890-1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morawska, Ewa. 1996. Insecure Prosperity. Small-Town Jews in Industrial America, 1890

1940. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Morawska, Ewa. 2003. "Disciplinary Agendas and Analytic Strategies of Research on Immi

gration and Transnationalism: Challenges of Interdisciplinary Know

ledge," International Migration Review 37: 611-640.

Muldrew, Craig. 1998. The Economy of Obligation. London: Macmillan, 2001.. '"Hard Food

for Midas': Cash and its Social Value in Early Modern England," Past and Present 170:

78-120.Muldrew, Craig. 1993. "Interpreting the Market: The Ethics of Credit and Community Rela

tions in Early Modern England," Social History 18: 163-183.

Ngai, Mae M. 2004. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America.

Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Ostergren, Robert C. 1988. A Community Transplanted. The Trans-Atlantic Experience of a

Swedish Immigrant Settlement in the Upper Middle West, 1835-1915. Uppsala: Acta Uni

versitatis Upsaliensis.

Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective

Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. "A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective

Action," American Political Science Review 92: 1-22.

Parrenas, Rhacel Salazar. 2005a. Children of Global Migration. Transnational Families and

Gendered Woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Parre?as, Rhacel Salazar. 2005b "Long Distance Intimacy: Class, Gender and Intergenerational Relations between Mothers and Children in Filipino Transnational Families," Glo

bal Networks 5: 317-336.

Passy, Florence. 1998. L'Action altruiste. Contraintes et opportunit?s de l'engagement dans les

mouvements sociaux. Geneva: Droz.

Passy, Florence. 2001. "Socialization, Connection, and the Structure/Agency Gap: A Specification of the Impact of Networks on Participation in Social Movements," Mobiliza

tion 6: 173-192.

Pastor, Reyna, Esther Pascua, Ana Rodriguez-Lopez, and Pablo S?nchez-Le?n. 2002.

Beyond theMarket. Transactions, Property and Social Networks inMonastic Galicia 1200

1300. Leiden: Brill.

Paxton, Pamela. 1999. "Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indica

tor Assessment," American Journal of Sociology 108: 88-127.Paxton, Pamela. 2002. "Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship,"

American Journal of Sociology 67: 254-277.

Philpott, Stuart B. 1968. "Remittance Obligations, Social Networks and Choice among

Montserratian Migrants in Britain.," Man, New Series 3: 465-476.

Piipponen, Minna. 2004. "Work-Related Ties in the Everyday Life of a Russian Karelian

Mill Community," In Alapuro Risto, Liikanen Ilkka and Lonkila Markku (eds.), BeyondPost-Soviet Transition. Micro Perspectives on Challenge and Survival in Russia and Estonia:

64-83. Saarij?rvi: Kikimora Publications.

Poros, Maritsa. 2001. "The Role of Migrant Networks in Linking Local Labour Markets:

The Case of Asian Indian Migration to New York and London," Global Networks 1:

243-259.

Portes, Alejandro (ed.). 1995. The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks,

Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Portes, Alejandro. 1996. The New Second Generation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.



22 Tilly

Portes, Alejandro, and Rub?n Rumbaut. 1990. Immigrant America. A Portrait. Berkeley, CA:

University of California Press.

Portes, Alejandro, and Rub?n Rumbaut. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second

Generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Postel-Vinay, Gilles. 1998. La terre et l'argent. L'agriculture et le cr?dit en France du XVIIIe

au d?but du Xxe si?cle. Paris: Albin Michel.

Powell, Walter W., and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 1994. "Networks and Economie Life," In Neil

J. Smelser and Swedberg Richard (eds.), The Handbook of Economie Sociology: 348-402.

Princeton, NJ/New York: Princeton University Press/Russell Sage Foundation.

Raddon, Mary-Beth. 2003. Community and Money: Caring, Gift-Giving, and Women in a

Social Economy. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

Raggio, Olsvaldo. 1990. Faide e P?rentele. Lo Stato Genovese visto dalla Fontanabuona.

Turin: Einaudi.

Riles, Annelise. 2000. The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor, MI: University of MichiganPress.

Roberts, Kenneth, and Michael D. Morris. 2003. "Fortune, Risk, and Remittances: An

Application of Option Theory to Participation in Village-Based Migration Networks,"

International Migration Review 37: 1252-1281.

Rotberg, Robert (ed.). 1999. "Patterns of Social Capital: Stability and Change in Comparative Perspective," Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29: nos. 3 and 4, Winter and Spring

1999, two entire issues.

Sanders, Jimy. 2002. "Ethnic Boundaries and Identity in Plural Societies," Annual Review of

Sociology 28: 327-357.

Shapiro, Susan P. 1987. "The Social Control of Impersonal Trust," American Journal of

Sociology 93: 623-658.

Singerman, Diane. 1995. Avenues of Participation. Family, Politics, and Networks in Urban

Quarters of Cairo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Singerman, Diane. 2004. "The Networked World of Islamist Social Movements," In Wi

ktorowicz Quintan (ed), Islamic Activism. A Social Movement Theory Approach: 125-146.

Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Singh, Supriya. 2005. "Sending Money Home: Money and Family in the Indian

Diaspora," Paper presented at the Institute for International Integration Studies

Seminar, Trinity College, Dublin, April, (http://mams.rmit.edu.au/e0eneunbp2w.pdf)viewed October 15, 2005.

Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy. From Membership toManagement in American

Civic Life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

Skocpol, Theda, and Morris P. Fiorina (eds.). 1999. Civic Engagement in American Demo

cracy. Washington, DC/New York: Brookings Institution/Russell Sage Foundation.

Smith, Robert Courtney. 2000. "How Durable and New is Transnational Life? Historical

Retrieval through Local Comparison," Diaspora 9: 203-232.Smith, Robert Courtney. 2002. "Life Course, Generation, and Social Location as Factors

Shaping Second-Generation Transnational Life," In Levitt Peggy and Mary C. Waters

(eds.), The Changing Face of Home. The Transnational Lives of the Second Generatio: 123

145. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Smith, Robert Courtney. 2003. "Migrant Membership as an Instituted Process: Transnation

alization, the State and the Extra-Territorial Conduct of Mexican Politics," International

Migration Review 37: 297-343.

Smith, Robert Courtney. 2005. Mexican New York: Transnational Worlds of New Immi

grants. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Smith-Doerr, Laurel, and Walter W. Powell. 2005. "Networks and Economic Life," In Neil

J. Smelser and Swedberg Richard (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2nd edn:

379-402. Princeton, NJ/New York: Princeton University Press/Russell Sage Foundation.

Solnick, Steven L. 1998. Stealing the State. Control and Collapse in Soviet Institutions.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.




Stark, Oded. 1995. Altruism and Beyond. An Economic Analysis of Transfers and Exchangeswithin Families and Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suro, Robert, Sergio Bendixen, B. Lindsay Lowell, and Dulce C. Benavides. 2002. Billions in

Motion: Latino Immigrants, Remittances and Banking. Washington, DC: Pew HispanicCenter and the Multilateral Investment Fund, (http://www.iadb.org/mif/v2/files/

nov22b.pdf) viewed October 13, 2005.

Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Tilly, Charles. 1990. "Transplanted Networks," In Yans-McLaughlin Virginia (ed), Immigration Reconsidered. History, Sociology, and Politics: 79-95. New York: Oxford University

Press.

Tilly, Charles. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Tilly, Charles. 2000. "Chain Migration and Opportunity Hoarding," In Janina W. Dacyl

and Charles Westin (eds.), Governance of Cultural Diversity, Stockholm: CEIFO [Centrefor Research in International Migration and Ethnic Relations], pp. 62-86.

Tilly, Charles. 2004. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650-2000. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Tilly, Charles. 2005a Trust and Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, Charles. 2005b Identities, Boundaries, and Social Ties. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publish

ers.

Tilly, Chris, and Charles Tilly. 1998. Work under Capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Tsai, Kellee S. 2002. Back-Alley Banking. Private Entrepreneurs in China. Ithaca, NY: Cor

nell University Press.

United Nations. 2004. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Economic and

Social Survey 2004. International Migration. New York: United Nations.

Uslaner, Eric M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

VanWey, Leah. 2004. "Altruistic and Contractual Remittances between Male and Female

Migrants and Households in Rural Thailand," Demography 41: 739-756.

Vertovec, Steven. 2003. "Migration and Other Modes of Transnationalism: Towards Con

ceptual Cross-Fertilization," International Migration Review 37: 641-665.

Waldinger, Roger D. 1996. Still the Promised City? African-Americans and New ImmigrantsinNew York, 1940-1990. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Waldinger, Roger and Mehdi Bozorgmehr (eds.). 1996. Ethnic Los Angeles. New York: Russell

Sage Foundation.

Warren, Mark E.(ed.). 1999. Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Watts, Duncan. 2003. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. New York: Norton.

Watts, Duncan. 2004. "The 'New' Science of Networks," Annual Review of Sociology 30:

243-270.

Weber, Linda R., and Allison I. Carter. 2003. The Social Construction of Trust. New York:Klu wer/Plenum.

White, Harrison C. 2002. Markets from Networks. Socioeconomic Models of Production.

Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Winters, Paul, Alain de Janvry, and Elisabeth Sadoulet. 2001. "Family and Community Net

works inMexico-US Migration," Journal of Human Resources 36: 159-184.

Wood, Elisabeth J. 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cam

bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wuthnow, Robert. 2004. "Trust as an Aspect of Social Structure," In Jeffrey C. Alexander,

Gary T. Marx and Christine L. Williams (eds.), Self, Social Structure, and Beliefs. Explorations in Sociology: 145-167. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Yamagishi, Toshio, and Midori Yamagishi. 1994. "Trust and Commitment in the United

States and Japan," Motivation and Emotion 18: 129-166.

Zelizer, Viviana A. 2004. "Circuits within Capitalism," In Nee Victor and Swedberg Richard

(eds.), The Economic Sociology of Capitalis: 289-322. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress.



24 Tilly

Zelizer, Viviana A. 2005a. "Culture and Consumption," In Neil J. Smelser and SwedbergRichard (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2nd edn: 331-354. Princeton, NJ/New

York: Princeton University Press/Russell Sage Foundation.

Zelizer, Viviana A. 2005b. The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University

Press.

Documents

21. 11. 11 Tilly_trust_migration