3. 5. [I/67531/metadc676750/m2/1/high... · -ASME Coded kam Human Factor ... Work Plan for Defining a Standard Inventory Estimate for Wastes Stored in Hanford Site ... HD W Model

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE Page 1 of 2

1.ECN 1 6 4 7 8 8 .....__ . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . ...... 2;

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE Page 1 of 2

1.ECN 1 6 4 7 8 8 .....__ . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . ...... 2;

Work Plan f o r De f in ing a

!. ECN Category 3. Or ig ina tor ' s N m , Organization, MSIN, 4. USQ Required? (mark one) and Telephone No.

5. Date

14a. J u s t i f i c a t i o n (mark one) C r i t e r i a Change [ ] Design l n p r o v m n t [ ] E n v i r o m n t a l [ ] F a c i l i t y Deact ivat ion [ ] As- Found [ X I F a c i l i t a t e Const [ ] Const. E r r o r l m i s s i o n [ ] Design E r r o r l m i s s i o n [ ] 14b. J u s t i f i c a t i o n D e t a i l s

Th is i s a planned update t o the Work P lan f o r D e f i n i n g a Standard I n v e n t o r y Est imate f o r Wastes S to red i n Hanford S i t e Underground Tanks t o a l i g n i t w i t h c u r r e n t guidance i n the areas o f Standard Inven to ry p o l i c y and change c o n t r o l implementation.

KM Hodgson, R2-11, 70000 373-3513 6. Pro jec t Title1No.lUork Order No.

A-7900-013-1 (11/88l

[I Yes [ X I NO 10/28/96

7. Bldg./Sys.lFac. No. 8 . Approval Designator

~iiii,ii r

Underground Tanks/N4G3A

WHC-SO-WM-WP-311, Revis ion 0

9 . D o c w n t Nufters Changed by t h i s ECN ( includes sheet no. and rev.)

10. Related ECN No(E). 11. Related PO NO.

N/A N/A I2a. Mod i f i ca t ion York 12b. Uork Package 12c. Modif icat ion York COnplete

No.

[ ] Yes (fill out BLk. N/A N/A 12b)

12c. 12d) Signature & Date [ X I No (NA Elks. 12b. Design Authori ty lcog. Engineer

12d. Restored t o Or ig ina l Condi- t i o n (Tw. or Standby ECN only)

N/A

Design Author i ty lcog. Engineer Signature 8 Date

Page 2 o f 2 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE 1. ECN (use no. from w. 1 )

164788

SDDIDD

16. Design 17. Cost Inpact ENGINEERING CDNSTRUCTIDN V e r i f i c a t i o n

Required Add i t iona l [ I $ Add i t iona l [ I $ savings [ I $ Savings

[ I yes

[XI No [ I f

Functional Design Criteria

Operating Specification

Criticality Specification

Concaptu.1 Design Rsporl

Equipment Spec.

c0n.t. spec.

Pmcumment spec.

Vendor Information

OM Manual

FSARISAR

Safmy Equipment Lmt

Radiation W o k Permit

Environmental impact Statement

Environmental Rapon

Environmsntai Parmn

18. Schedule Inpact (days)

l nprovannt [ ] Delay [ I

StredDs*ign Repor(

Interface Comml Drawing

Calibration Pmcsdura

Inmallmion Procadurn

Malntmanca Procedure

Engineering Procedure

Operming Instruction

Operating Pmcadun

Operational Safsty Requlremsnt

IEFD Drawing

MW Amangomsnt Drawing

Essential Material Specification

Fac. Pms. Sarnp. Schedule

Inapoctian Plan

Inventory Adjumment Rsqusn

Tank Calibntion Manual

Heakh Phydss Pmcsdun

Spares Multiple Unk Liming

Tam PmcaduredSpoclficatlon

Component lndax

-ASME Coded kam

Human Factor Consideration

Computer Softwan

Electric Cirsuk Sehadulo

ICRS Procedure

Procass Control MmusllPlan

Prncssr Flow Chart

Purchase Requisition

Tickler File

NIA ..

[ I [ I 20. Other Affected Docmnts : (NOTE: Doc-ts l i s t e d below w i l l not be revised by t h i s ECN.) Signatures belou

ind icate that the signing organization has been n o t i f i e d of other affected d o c w n t s l i s t e d belou. DoCUnent Number/Revision

N /A D o c w n t NtnberfRevision D o c w n t N*r Revision

21. Approvals

Design Author i ty Design Agent

Cog. Eng. K. M. Hodgson<BY?l.&+,-

Cog. Mgr.

PA Safety

Safety

Signature Date Signature

N. Y. K i rch nu&,&.- Design

Envi ron.

Process Engineering, J. P. Sloughter

Other M. D . LeClair fl.&& TYRS Characterization, J . U. C m n

Environ.

Other

DEPARTMENT O f ENERGY

Signature or a Control N u h e r that tracks the Approval Signature

___

Date

1-7900-013-3 (D5/96) GEF096

rnn7 . F

e? WHC-SD-WM-WP-311, Rev. 1

Work Plan for Defining a Standard Inventory Estimate for Wastes Stored in Hanford Site Underground Tanks

K. 1. Hodgson and M. D. LeC la i r Lockheed M a r t i n Hanford Corporation, Rithland, 'WA99352 U. S. Department o f Energy Contract 80232764-9-KO01

EDT/ECN: 164788 UC: 721 Org Code: 04E00 Charge Code: N4G3A B&R Code: EW3120074 To ta l Pages: 60

Key Words: standard inventory , work p lan

Abst ract : Th i s work p l a n addresses the Standard Inven to ry t a s k scope, de l i ve rab les , budget, and schedule f o r f i s c a l yea r 1997. The goal o f t h e Standard Inven to ry t a s k i s t o reso lve d i f f e rences among t h e many repo r ted Hanford S i t e tank waste i nven to ry values and t o p rov ide i nven to ry est imates t h a t w i l l serve as Standard Inven to ry values f o r a l l waste management and d isposal a c t i v i t i e s . These best -bas is est imates o f chemicals and rad ionuc l i des w i l l be repo r ted on both a g loba l and t a n k - s p e c i f i c bas i s and w i l l be pub1 ished i n the Tank Charac te r i za t i on Database.

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. trade name. trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessari ly cons t i tu te or i n p l y i t s endorsement, r e c m n d a t i o n , o r favoring by the Unitad States G o v e r m n t or any agency thereof o r i t s contractors or subcontractors.

Pr in ted i n the United States o f Amr ica . D o c w n t Control Services, P.O. Box 1970, Mailstop H6-08, R i c h l a d UA 99352, Phone (509 ) 372-2420; Fax (509 ) 376-4989.

Reference herein t o any s p c i f i c c m r c i a l product, process, or serv ice by

To ob ta in copies of t h i s d o c w n t , contact: UHC/BCS

- 3 0 - 7 6 Date Release Stanp

Approved for Public Release

1-6400-073 (10 /95 ) GEF321

(1) DocMent N-r RECORD OF REVISION

WHC-SD-WM-WP-311 ( 2 ) T i t l e

Work Plan for Defining a Standard Inventory Estimate for Wastes Stored in Hanford Site Underaround Tanks

Page 1

(3) Rev1 s i on

0

1 RS 10/28/96 Planning update for fiscal K. M. Hodgsonl N. W. Kirch year 1997. Per ECN-164788.

Z h ! ! m/* /

( 4 ) Description o f Change ~ Replace, Add, and Delete Authorized for Release ( 5 ) Cog. Engr. (6) Cog. Mgr. Date Pages

(7) 9/28/95 Initial Release. M. J. Kupfer J. P. Sloughter EDT-613158

A-7520-005 ( 0 8 / 9 0 WEF168

WHC-SD-WM-WP-311 .Revision 1

WORK PLAN FOR DEFINING A STANDARD INVENTORY ESTIMATE FOR WASTES STORED IN HANFORD

SITE UNDERGROUND TANKS

October 1996

K. M. Hodgson M. D. LeClair

Lockheed Martin Hanford Corporation Richland, Washington

WHC-SD-WM-WP-311 Revision 1

This page intentionally left blank.

ii


CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2.0 SCOPE, OBJECTIVES, AND DELIVERABLES 5 2.1 SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2 OBJECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3 DELIVERABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

3.0 TASK DESCRIPTION AND APPROACH , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1 IDENTIFYUSERNEEDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2 DEVELOP STANDARD INVENTORY VALUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3 DOCUMENT THE PEDIGREE FOR STANDARD INVENTORY VALUES . 8 3.4 DOCUMENT THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DERIVE INVENTORIES . 10 3.5 PUBLISH THE STANDARD INVENTORY AND PEDIGREE . . . . . . . . . 10 3.6 MAINTAIN CHANGE CONTROL ON THE STANDARD INVENTORY . . 11 3.7 OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE TANK CONTENT MODELS . . . . . . . 13 3.8 INTEGRATE WITH TANK CHARACTERIZATION REPORT

BEST-BASIS WRITE-UPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.9 INTEGRATE WITH THE INVENTORY ESTIMATE RESOLUTION TASK . 15 3.10 INTEGRATE WITH THE CHEMICAL COMPOUND MODELING TASK . 15

4.0 BUDGET AND SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.1 BUDGET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 7

. . 17

5.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDIXES

A - SUMMARY OF DATA REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1

B - STANDARD INVENTORY CONTENT LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1

C - STANDARD INVENTORYEANK CHARACTERIZATION REPORT INTEGRATED SCHEDULE AND RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . C-1

... 111


LIST OF FIGURES

3.2-1. Development of Global and Tank-Specific Standard Inventory Values . . . . . . . . 3.6-1. Standard Inventory Change Control Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

3.7-1. Maintenance of Standard Inventory Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

4.1-1. Standard Inventory Task Funding Profile.. Fiscal Year 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

9

4.2-1. Standard Inventory Task Schedule.. Fiscal Year 1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

iv

DNFSB

DQO DST

FY HDW

HLAN

HTCE

IDB

LANL

LDR

ORIGEN2

PNNL

NEPA

RCRA

SORWT

SST

TCD

TCR TWRS

WSTRS


LET OF TERMS

Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board

Data quality objectives

Double-shell tank

Fiscal Year Hanford Defined Waste

Hanford Local Area Network

Historical Tank Content Estimate

Integrated Database

LQS Alamos National Laboratory

Land Disposal Restrictions

Oak Ridge Isotope Generation (computer code)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

National Environmental Protection Act of 1969 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 Sort on Radioactive Waste Type

Single-shell tank

Tank Characterization Database

Tank Characterization Report

Tank Waste Remediation System

Waste Status and Transaction Record Summary

V

WHC-SD-WM-WP-3 1 1 Revision 1

This page hteIItiOMlly left blank.

vi

WHC-SD-WM-WP-3 11 Revision 1

WORK PLAN FOR DEFINING A STANDARD INVENTORY ESTIMATE FOR W'ASTES STORED IN HANFORD SITE

UNDERGROUND TANKS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Safe storage and eventual remediation of waste stored in Hanford Site ttnderground tanks is a major function of the Tank Waste Remediation System (IWRS). Key waste management activities involve monitoring of the stored waste, management of tank farm operations, identification of potential safety issues associated with waste storage, resolution of already identified safety issues, and eventually retrieval and processing of the waste to a form suitable for long-term storagddisposal. Related safety analyses, engineering evaluations, risk assessments, and regulatory permitting activities require information about the chemical and radionuclide inventories of the tank wastes. These inventories are usually provided in the form of tank waste component inventories on a total (so-called "global") or tank-specific basis.

Global inventory information is reported in several sources including:

Estimated Inventory of Chemicals Added to Underground Waste Tanks, 1944 Through 1975 (Allen 1976)

Hanford Defense Waste Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE 1987)

Drafi Environmental Impact Statement for the Tank Waste Remediation System (DOE 1996a)

Chemical and Radionuclide Inventory for Single and Double-Shell Tanks (Shelton 1996)

Hanford Tank Content Estimare (HTCE) documents (Brevick 1995, Brevick et al. 1995a, Brevick et al. 1995b, and Brevick et al. 1996)

Hanford Tank Chemical and Radionuclide Inventories: HDWModel Rev. 3 (Agnew 1996) which reports predictions of the Hanford Defined Waste (HDW) model developed by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)

National databases, such as the Federal Facility Compliance Act Database and Integrated Database (DOE 1994).

1


Each of the inventory reports listed above contains the best inventory knowledge available at the time of publication. Inventories reported in the Hanford Defense Waste Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE 1987) are based on those established by Allen (1976) but also include those chemicals used in process operations after 1975. The inventories reported by Shelton (1996). in support of TWRS process flowsheet modeling work, correspond with Hanford Defense Waste Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE 1987) values with two exceptions: (1) TWRS double-shell tank (DST) inventories were revised to reflect sampling data, and (2) TWRS single-shell tank (SST) component inventories for aluminum, chromium, phosphate, and chloride were revised as the result of a recent (1995) evaluation of these inventories. Finally, the HDW model predictions were based on historical data and do not directly correspond to any of the global inventory reports. Not surprisingly, the various global inventory sources provide inconsistent inventory values.

Tank-specific inventories are also contained in several sources including:

Hanford Tank Chemical and Radionuclide Inventories: HD W Model Rev. 3 (Agnew 1996) which reports predictions of the HDW model developed by LANL

Tank Characterization Reports (TCRs)

Hanford Tank Content Estimate documents (Brevick 1995, Brevick et al. 1995a, Brevick et al. 1995b, and Brevick et al. 1996)

Radionuclide and Chemical Inventories for the Single Shell Tanks (Van Vleet 1993a) and Radionuclide and Chemical Inventories for the Double Shell Tanks (Van Vleet 1993b)

Multiple electronic databases, e.g., Tank Characterization Database (TCD) (PNL 1994), Braun Database (Forehand 1995), and ICF-Kaiser Hanford Company Database (Brevick 1995d).

Several attempts have been made over the years to distribute global component inventories among individual waste tanks. The distribution is performed by: (1) estimating component inventories using results from sample analyses, or (2) predicting component inventories using a model based on process knowledge and historical information. The result is that tank-specific inventory sources also report inconsistent inventory values.

Due to the existence of multiple inventory sources, component inventories used for one purpose often differ from inventories used for another purpose. Compounding this problem are uncertainties in the data that may arise from misinterpretation or omission of historical data, calculational errors, etc. Because of the differences among the many reported inventory values, the goal of the present task is to resolve these differences and to provide waste inventory estimates, both on a global and a tank-specific basis, that can serve as Standard Inventory values for all waste management and disposal activities.

2

..“,,I, ”


Information presented in this work plan is as follows:

0

Section 1 .O provides background information relating to tank inventories.

Section 2.0 defines the scope, objectives and deliverables of the Standard Inventory task.

Section 3.0 presents an overview of the task and provides the description, approach, responsibilities and deliverables for each of the task elements.

Section 4.0 provides the schedule and budget profile for the Standard Inventory task.

Section 5.0 lists the references used in this work plan.

Appendix A presents a summary of data requirements initially used to define the scope of this task.

Appendix B presents a discussion of content limitation and the resulting set of chemicals and radionuclides addressed by the Standard Inventory task.

Appendix C contains an integrated schedule defining the best-basis and TCR preparation in FY 1997. Appendix C also contains a matrix of tank coordinator and Standard Inventory team member assignments by tank.

3



4


2.0 SCOPE, OBJECTIVES, AND DELIVERABLES

This work plan defines the list of chemical and radionuclides for which Standard Inventory values will be developed and discusses the Standard Inventory development, publication and maintenance. Specific task scope items, objectives and deliverables are delineated in the following sections.

2.1 SCOPE

This task includes definition of the Standard Inventory data set, development of the initial Standard Inventory values and documentation of the pedigree and methodologies supporting these values. Also included in this scope of work are the TCD upgrades to facilitate Standard Inventory publication and the organizationaUoperationa1 systems required to maintainhpdate both the Standard Inventory and the HDW model.

2.2 OaTECTIVES

The objectives of this task are as follows:

e

Identify data user needs relative to Standard Inventory development.

Document the methodologies used to generate the Standard Inventory values.

Develop Standard Inventory values on both a global and a tank-specific basis by applying uniform methodologies and utilizing the best available data.

Document the pedigree associated with the Standard Inventory values.

Meet Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (DNFSB) commitments defined in the Recommendation 93-5 Implementation Plan (DOE 1996b).

Publish the Standard Inventory and pedigree in a useable form.

Establish the Standard Inventory as the "official" inventory reference for tank waste chemicals and radionuclides, and maintain change contra1 on the Standard Inventory through a formal data review and incorporation process.

Develop TCR best-basis section write-ups.

5

WHC-SD-WM-W-3 11 Revision 1

Operate the HDW model including the identification and incorporation of appropriate modifications to the model.

Integrate with the Inventory Estimate Resolution Task which will derive a statement of statistical variability to bound the Standard Inventory value with appropriate uncertainty and confidence intervals.

2.3 DELIVEFUBLES

The principal deliverable resulting from this effort is the Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes document which is to be issued as a supporting document to U.S. Department of Energy-Richland Operations Office by August 1997 and to the DNFSB by November 1997. This document will contain the Standard Inventory values and associated pedigree. The values will be reported on both a global and tank-specific basis for a set of chemicals and radionuclides. (See Section 3.1 for additional discussion of the Standard Inventory set.) Additional deliverables include the following:

Documentation of methodologies utilized to derive Standard Inventories.

Upgrade of the TCD to accommodate electronic storage and retrieval of the global and tank-specific Standard Inventories values and pedigree.

Establishment of the policy and organizational approach to maintain change control on the Standard Inventory.

Best-basis section write-ups in support of TCR issuance.

Post deliverable documents electronically to a Hanford Local Area Network (HLAN) server to enable electronic access via TCR electronic template and technical data book.

Maintenancehpgrade of the HDW model.

Interface with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) on the Inventory Estimate Resolution Task.

6


3.0 TASK DESCRIPTION AND APPROACH

The following sections describe each of the task elements and the associated responsibilities and deliverable for each element. Interfaces with other activities is also described.

3.1 IDENTIFY USER NEEDS

In order to scope this task, existing Data Quality Objective (DQO) documents were reviewed and cognizant personnel were contacted to identify specific data requirements associated with: safety assessments, risk assessments, safety analyses, National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) documen,tation, facility permits, waste treatment/disposal system design, development and implementation, etc. As a result of these efforts, a summary of data requirements was compiled and is included in Appendix A.

The data requirements defined in Appendix A are quite extensive and since available resources were limited, it was necessary to focus this task on a subset of the Appendix A data requirements. A discussion of the content limitations and the resulting set of chemical and radionuclides addressed by the Standard Inventory task is provided in Attachment B. This subset of chemicals and radionuclides was reviewed with users during the Standard Inventory User and Policy Workshops conducted in July 1996. Users emphasized the need for chemical compound inventories to support retrieval, disposal and closure activities. Since compound inventories cannot be obtained using the Standard Inventory methodologies, a Chemical Compound Modeling Task has been planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 1997. This task is directed at compound inventory definition and is described further in Section 3.10.

Responsibility: Standard Inventory Team

Deliverable: User Requirement Discussion to be issued as chapter of the Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes document

status: Complete.

3.2 DEVELOP STANDARD INVENTORY VALUES

As discussed in Section 1.0, there are many sources of tank waste inventory data. In most cases these sources report inconsistent inventory values. This task element involves derivation of the standard chemical and radionuclide inventories, on both a global and tank-by-tank basis. This is done by compiling and evaluating existing inventory sources (Le., sample-based inventories, HDW model projections and TWRS flowsheet inventories [Shelton 19961). Historical information (e.g., process flowsheets, fuel processing records,

WHC-SD-WM-W-311 Revision 1

purchase records and process facility logbooks, chemical usage records) and sample analysis data serve as a basis for reconciling the various inventory sources. Much of the information resulting from a PNNL task to statistically compare actual sample results to the HDW model predictions may also support this evaluation effort.

Such a reconciliation process aids in the identification of inventory source discrepancies and errors, and results in the preferred inventory value, referred to as the Standard Inventory value. This value serves as the official inventory value until which time additional data is made available to warrant another iteration of this process. Figure 3.2-1 provides an overview of the process for developing Standard Inventory values. (Note: the dashed box around the change control board indicates that this board is not currently in place. Transition to maintenance of Standard Inventory and the HDW model are further discussed in Sections 3.6 and 3.7, respectively.) The schedule for completing the Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes document is provided in Section 4.2.


Deliverable: The Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Waste$ document with Standard Inventory values reported on a global and tank-specific basis; quarterly status reports

Status: In progress.

3.3 DOCUMENT THE PEDIGREE FOR STANDARD INVENTORY VALUES

Full documentation of the calculations, references and supporting information used to derive each Standard Inventory value is required. This documentation serves as the pedigree on the Standard Inventory value and will be reported in sufficient detail to support defense of Standard Inventory values if such values are ever challenged. Such documentation also serves as a historical record to be used if detailed information relating to an inventory value is required. The schedule for issuing interim drafts for review and for publication of the final document is provided in Section 4.2.


Deliverable: Section in the Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes document for each global and tank-specific write-up

Status: In progress.

8

W

I , I

Hanford Defined Waste (HDW Model

Sample Data' Existing Future

Model

Change Control Board A~veAsscssmeotRsu l t s

1. Mmt applicable to Iank-spciIic mvmtak. 2. ORlGENZ - Oak Ridge Isatapc Gmcntion

3. SORWT - sat an ~ d i d v o Wrste Type model (COmpM codc) ( W i i 1989).

Summny (Agncw 1995s,1995b, 8 (Hill lad s i 1994). (D

-2 4.wsTRs -wrstemtmaadTmt!adi.mRecad

1% and 1996b).


3.4 DOCUMENT THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DERIVE INVENTORIES

Within the Standard Inventory methodology, depending on the type and quality of information available to an author, various approaches can be used to derive Standard Inventory values. Details of the methodology and the various approaches may be thought of as something similar to desk instructions and will subsequently be referred to as "the methodology." At a later date, individuals not currently on the Standard Inventory Team may be tasked with maintenance of the Standard Inventory values. To aid this transition and to assure quality control on the Standard Inventory values, the methodology is to be documented and utilized. As new approaches are demonstrated, they may-be added to the methodology.


Deliverable: Chapter of the Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes document

status: In progress.

3.5 PUBLISH THE STANDARD INVENTORY AND PEDIGREE

During the course of this task, Standard Inventory best-basis write-ups will be accessible via an HLAN server. The Standard Inventory will be formally issued as a hard copy document in August 1997. However, to support future maintenance of the inventory, the intent is to publish the Standard Inventory on a media that is easily accessible by data users, capable of being readily updated and has the capacity to archive Standard Inventory values and pedigree. An electronic format has been selected for future storage and retrieval of the Standard Inventory, and the TCD has been recognized as an existing resource for providing these capabilities.

This task element involves the TCD modifications required to meet the Standard Inventory publication needs. These needs include mechanisms for loading the Standard Inventory values into the TCD, standard report generation, inventory archiving, hyperlinks to Standard Inventory pedigree and references, and mechanisms to support change control implementation and change control board operation. The TCD upgrades are to be implemented in four phases. Phase 1, which provided data structures for global and tank-by-tank inventory storage, data entrylloading mechanisms, user access to inventories via Web-based query and technical basis references as bibliographical entries, was completed in FY 1996. The remaining three phases will be implemented in FY 1997 per the schedule and are summarized below:

'.m, 1 '1 n'

10


Phase 2, Data Loading and User Support: This phase will provide additional information reporting, including the ability to generate the information in the inventory summary tables based on date supplied by user. The data entry mechanism will also be improved.

Phase 3, Reference Text and Reporting: This phase of work will allow for storing and reporting of pedigree and bibliography text.

Phase 4, Change Control Implementation and Board Support: Implementation of the configuration change, pending change and revision tables will occur in this phase of work. Tools to support users in submitting changes to the change control board will also be developed.

Responsibility: Tank Characterization Database Administrators with direction and support from the Standard Inventory team

Standard Inventory publication, reporting, and change control support mechanisms

Deliverable:


3.6 MAINTAIN CHANGE CONTROL ON THE STANDARD INVENTORY

Much of the work described in Section 3.5 will provide the architecture required to maintain change control on the Standard Inventory values. However, for the Standard Inventory values to remain useful, they must be periodically updated and modified to reflect current information available on tank contents. As sample analysis results, modeling data, and other information becomes available, it must be evaluated and reconciled with the existing data in much the same fashion that the initial Standard Inventory values were derived. Revised Standard Inventory values and associated pedigree must then be approved by the change control board and incorporated into the TCD. Figure 3.6-1 provides an overview of Standard Inventory change control operation developed during the Standard Inventory User and Policy Workshops conducted in July 1996. This figure will serve as the basis for the work under this task element and much of the work described in Section 3.5.

This task will define the details of the protocol to be followed for proposing and approving changes to the Standard Inventory and for updating the TCD to report revised Standard Inventory values. Responsibilities, authorities, methodology application, quality assurance practices, and database configuration control will also be addressed.

11


Responsibility: Standard 1nvent.ory Team

Deliverables: Draft Organization Charts and Charters, Draft Procedures and Standards


3.7 OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE TANK CONTENT MODELS

The ORIGEN2 model (Wittekind 1989) output serves as input to the HDW model (Agnew 1996) which in turn partitions the radionuclide inventory to the tank system and generates tank-specific radionuclide inventories. As currently conceived, the HDW model (Agnew 1996) and the ORIGENZ model will play a significant role in the maintenance of Standard Inventory values. It is foreseen that the models will be tools to aid in making decisions regarding future changes to the Standard Inventory values. Figure 3.7-1 depicts the HDW model predictions serving as input to any assessment process aimed at evaluating and revising an existing Standard Inventory value.

Per the LANL schedule, the beta version of the user interface for the HDW model will be available by mid-July 1997. In this same time frame, control of the HDW model will be transferred to Hanford. No major revisions or upgrades to the model can be accomplished in the remainder of FY 1997, however, advanced copies of the model can be obtained for evaluation and assessment. Efforts in FY 97 will be directed at establishing an understanding of useful improvements which can be made to the model and the specific role the model will play once control of the model has been transferred to Hanford.

The ORIGEN2 model and associated codes were revised in 1996 to support the Standard Inventory task. Any model improvements, based on new information or the outcome of reconciling the HDW model predictions, will be identified. Such efforts will serve to scope tank content model work for FY 1998, including the completion of a DNFSB 93-5 milestone (5.6.3.1.i) to update the tank content models or define the limitations of the models (DOE 1996b).


Deliverables:

status: FY 1997 task.

Multi-Year Program Plan input for model improvements and operation

12


Figure 3.7-1. Maintenance of Standard Inventory Values.

-~

vl

t

3

3-

15


3.8 INTEGRATE WITH TANK CHARACTERIZATION REPORT BEST-BASIS WRITE-UPS

In FY 1997, the TCRs are moving to a slightly revised format which includes a "best-basis" section. The content of this "best-basis" section is patterned after the tank-specific write-ups included in the Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wartes document. In recognition of this commonality, an integrated schedule has been developed which defines best-basis and TCR preparation in FY 97. This schedule is provided in Appendix C. A matrix defining the tank coordinators (TCR authors) and Standard Inventory team members (best-basis authors) by tank also is provided in Appendix C. The schedule is subject to revisions resulting from changes to tank priority, sampling schedule, TCR schedule, etc.


Deliverables: "Best-basis" section write-ups in support of TCR schedule. (See Appendix C)


3.9 INTEGRATE WITH THE INVENTORY ESTIMATE RESOLUTION TASK

By the end of FY 1997, a white paper is to be issued by representatives of PNNL which defines a standard method for estimating uncertainty in Standard Inventory values. This method is to take into account numerical modeling results, sampling analyses results and engineering analysis results. The Standard Inventory team will support this effort as necessary, especially with regard to the engineering analysis process utilized by the Standard Inventory team. Application of the methodology to develop uncertainty statements related to the Standard Inventory values will not occur until FY 1998.


Deliverables: Input as necessary to the Inventory Estimate Resolution task


3.10 INTEGRATE WITH THE CHEMICAL COMPOUND MODELING TASK

In FY 1997, representatives from PNNL will perform chemical compound modeling work directed at defining inventories of compounds within the tank waste. The primary drivers for this effort include the Retrieval Program's need for information to support retrieval equipment design and the DisposalKlosure Program's need for similar information to ensure compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) requirements under Resource

16


Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) closures. These compound inventories cannot be obtained using the Standard Inventory methodologies. (Note: Standard Inventory values are being derived for ionic species.) A representative of the Standard Inventory team will support this effort by providing necessary direction to the task and by making available any Standard Inventory values which may be needed as input to the model.


Deliverables: Input as necessary to the Chemical Compound Modeling task


17

WHC-SD-Wh4-WP-311 Revision 1


18


4.0 BUDGET AND SCHEDULE

The following sections provide budget and schedule details associated with the task elements described in Section 3.0.

4.1 BUDGET

The total budget allocated to the efforts described in this task plan is $972,000 (functional dollars). Figure 4.1-1 provides the predicted funding profile for this task. Costs throughout the fiscal year are expected to remain fairly constant. There is a slight ramping up in the first three quarters of the fiscal year which correspond to the Standard Znventon'es of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes document preparation. Costs in the last quarter of the fiscal year are at nearly the same level due to focus on finalizing and issuing the document and transition to the Standard Inventory maintenance phase.

4.2 SCHEDULE

Figure 4.2-1 depicts the schedule associated with the work described in this plan. The schedule correlates with the task breakdown provided in Section 3.0. There are no schedule items related to any of the integration activities since these activities have no specific deliverables defined.

19


Figure 4.1-1. Standard Inventory Task Funding Profile--Fiscal Year 1997.

.E P W B

H f! c .Y

20

WHC-SD-WM-WP-3 11 Figure 4.2-1. Standard Inventory Task Schedule--Fiscal Year 1997.

Standard Inventory Task Schedule 1 Revision 1

Project Standard Inventory Task Sch Date 10/25/%

2 1011 1/95 10/11/96 -1 I METHODOLOGY AND PEDIGREES (Sections 3.2-3.4 of work plan) 1 FY96 4111 Quarter Status Report

Task - Milestone + Rolled Up Task - Rolled Up Progress - Progress - Summary 7 4 Rolled Up Milestone 0

11/28/97 11/28/97 15 Submit Document to DNFSB

16 PUBLISH STANDARD INVENTORY AND PEDIGREE (Section 3.5 of work 10/1/96 9/30/97

17 TCD Phase 2: Data Entry/User Reports 1/17/97 1 10/1/96 plan)

I TCD Phase 3: ReferencelPedigree Text and Reporting

TCD Phase 4: Change Control Support

I I I 129/% 8/29/97 22 Dowment Drafl Change Control Procedures

I 23 Implement Change Control for Standard Inventory 9/1/97 9/30/97

I 24 OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE TANK CONTENT MODELS (Section 3.7 of 8/1/97 9/30/97

25 Prepare and Submit Multi-Year Program Plan Input 1 8/1/97 9/30/97 work Dlanl

+ l o p

-1

+ 4/11

- @ 11/28

I 1

2 1 I22


5.0 REFERENCES

Agnew, S . F., 1995a, Waste Status and Transaction Record Summary for the Southeast Quadrant of the Hanford 200 East Area, WHC-SD-WM-TI-689, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Agnew, S . F., 1995b, Waste Status and Transaction Record Summary for the Northwest Quadrant of the Hanford 200 West Area, WHC-SD-WM-TI-669, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Agnew, S . F., 1996a, Waste Status and Transaction Record Summary for the Northeast Quadrant of the 200 East Area, WHC-SD-WM-TI-615, Rev. 1, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Agnew, S . F., 1996b, Waste Status and Transaction Record Summary for the Southwest Quadrant of the 200 West Area, WHC-SD-WM-TI-614, Rev. 1, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Agnew, S . F., J. Boyer, R. Corbin, T. Duran, J. FitzPatrick, K. Jurgensen, T. Ortiz, and B. Young, 1996, Hanford Tank Chemical and Radionuclide Inventories: HDW Model Rev. 3, Draft, March 5 , 1996, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Allen, G. K., 1976, Estimated Inventory of Chemicals Added to Underground Waste Tanks, '

1944 through 1975, ARH-CD-610B, Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Brevick, C. H., 1995, Historical Tank Content Estimate for the Southwest Quadrant of the Hanford 200 West Area, WHC-SD-WM-ER-352, Rev. OA, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Brevick, C. H., L. A. Gaddis, and E. D. Johnson, 1995a, Historical Tank Content Estimate for the Northwest Quadrant of the Hanford 200 West Area, WHC-SD-WM-ER-35 1, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Brevick, C. H., L. A. Gaddis, and W. W. Pickett, 1995b, Historical Tank Content Estimate for the Southeast Quadrant of the Hanford 200 Areas, WHC-SD-WM-ER-350, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Brevick, C. H., 1995c, Tank Waste Source Term Inventory Validation, WHC-SD-WM-ER-400, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

23


Brevick, C. H., R. L. Newell, and J . W. Funk, 1996, Historical Content Estimate for the Northeast Quadrant of the Hanford 200 East Area, WHC-SD-WM-ER-349, Rev. 1, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Brown, T. M., 1996, Tank Waste Analysis Plan, WHC-SD-WM-PLN-120, Rev. XX, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

DOE, 1987, Final Environmental Impact Statement. Disposal of Hanford Dtfense High- Level, Transuranic and Tank Wastes, DOE/EIS-0113, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE, 1994, Integrated Data Base RepoR-1993: U.S. Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste Inventories, Projections, and Characteristics, DOEIRW-0006, Rev. 10, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE, 1996a, Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Tank Waste Remediation System, DOE/EIS-O189D, U.S. Department of Energy and Washington State Department of Ecology, Richland, Washington.

DOE, 1996b, Recommendation 93-5 Implementation Plan, DOEIRL-94-0001, Rev. 1, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland, Washington.

Forehand, G. D., 1995, Characterization Data Catalog, internal memo 71520-95-101, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Hill, J. G. and B. C. Simpson, 1994, The Sort on Radioactive Waste Type Model: A Method to Sort Single-Shell Tanks into Characteristic Groups, PNL-9814, Rev. 1, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

Homi, C. S., 1996, Fiscal Year 1997 Tank Waste Analysis Plan, WHC-SD-WM-PLN-120, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

PNL, 1994, TWINS User Guide Tank Waste Characterization Information Nemork System Version 4.0, PNL-8824-2, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

Shelton, L. W., 1996, Chemical and Radionuclide Inventory for Single and Double-Shell Tanks, Internal Memo to D. J. Washenfelder, 74A20-96-30, dated February 28, 1996, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Van Vleet, R. J . , 1993a, Radionuclide and Chemical Inventories for the Single Shell Tanks, WHC-SD-WM-TI-565, Rev. 1, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

24

WHC-SD-Wh4-WP-3 11 Revision 1

Van Vleet, R. I., 1993b, Radionuclide and Chemical Inventories for the Double Shell Tanks, WHC-SD-WM-TI-543, Rev. 1, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

Wittekind, W. D., 1989, Sofhyare Certification Package for the ORIGEN2 Computer Code, WHC-SD-NR-SWD-006, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

25



26


APPENDIX A

SUMMARY OF DATA REQUIREMENTS

A- 1



A-2


APPENDIX A

Aarlyw p-*r

AI AE A8

B Ba BC

Bi ca Ce Cd CI CO Cr crt1 C r t 6 C, ni

F FL FcCKiCN lorn* HE K la Li M8 M" MO Na Nd NH4 N, NU2 NO1 OH oxalate Pb Pd !nalPupDI PI Rh R" Sb SC

Si lollil sad scd sr Te TIC (COI) Th Ti TOC u (mal) V W zn zr

P

P. L H , L

H P. H

H

H. L P H

P . H . L H H

P, H P. L P. L

P

H H

P, H, L H H H H H

P, H. L P, H. L

P. H H

P, L H H

P, H, L P. H H

H H. L

P. H. L P, H

L P. L

P. H. L

x x

r

x

x 1

I

1

x x

1

x x

I

SUMMARY OF DATA REQUIREMENTS Table A-1. Summary of Data Requirements. (Sheet 1 of 4)

Safdylrulr

rcndoc

NaOH

A-3

AnrlYlCi parmctcr

3.H 14-c 59-Ni ~

60-Co 63-NI 79-ss 90-SdY 93-Zrim-Nb 9 9 . T ~ 106.R~ 113-Cdim 125-Sb 126-Sn 129-1 134.cs 137-CsiBa 151-Sm 152-Eu 154-Eu 155-Eu 226-Rn 2 2 1 . A ~ 228-Ra 229-?I 231-Pa 232-Th 232-u 233.u 234-U 235-U 236-U 237-Np 2 3 8 - h 238.U 2 3 9 1 2 4 0 . ~ ~ 241-Am 241.- 142-YU 242-Cm 243-Am

2 4 3 . m z u - r m total alpha WISI beta

Table A-1.

- 3. 4. 51

liqorc

H.L

htls.li

-

x

x P.H.L

A P.L

- H H

P3 .L

P8.L

P.L P.L -

P.H.L

x - P A L P.H.L

P.H.1 P,H,I P..H.I P.H.1

x

- P.H.1 P.H.1

-


Summary of Data Requirements. (Sheet 2 of 4) S.lClVlrjrL

x

x

x

-

x

x

x

x x

-

x

-

A-4

x x x x x

P


Table A-1. Summary of Data Requirements. (Sheet 4 of 4) h s u m and oppcnuma Safetylrkk

r d W Y ~

P = Prelmlmcnt Concern H = High-level Waslc Concern L = Law-level Wastc Concern B = Class B Toxic Air Pollutanls, WAC 173460-160 A(1, II, m) = Tables I, U, and III Class A Toxic Air Pollutants, WAC-173460-150

IA, IB, IC: Table I, Pans 1 A, B, and C, Ground Watcr Quality Criteria, WAC 173-200-040 as OH- as hydroxide

h = hcadspace concern Information Sources

( I ) WHC-SD-WM-DQO-001, Rev. 1. Data Quality ObjCaives For Tank Farms Wasle Compatibility Program (2) WAC-SD-WM-DQO-008, Rev 0.

(3) WHC-SD-WM-DQO-OI I , Rev, 1. Interim Data Quality Objenives for Wastc PWeatment and Vitrification. Tsblcs 2 and 3. (4) WHC-SD-WM-DQO-023, Rev. 0 (Draft 10117/95). Data Requirements for TWR5 Privalization Waste Characterization. (5 ) WHC-SD-DQO-022, Rev. 0. Data Ncedr and Allendant Data Quality Objectives for Tank Waste Pretreatment and Disposal. (6) WHC-SD-WM-DQO-002, Rev. 1. Data Quality ObjCaivcs for Gcneric In-Tank Heallh and Safety Vapor Issue Resolution. (7) WHC-SD-WM-DQO-004, Rev. I .

(8) WHC-SD-WM-DQO-006, Rev. I . Data Quality Objcctivc lo Suppon Resolution of lhc Organic Fuel Rich Tank Safety Issue. (9) WHC-SD-WM-DQO-007, Rev. 1. FcnacyanidcData Qualily Objective5 Document. (IO) WHC-SD-WM-SP-004, Rev. 1 and WHC-SD-WM-DQO-012, Rev. 0. Tank Safefy Screening Data Quality Objedivc, Rev. 1. ( I I ) WAC 173460-150, Class A-Tables I, II, Ill and 173-460-160, Class B. (12) LLW Vitdfication: ContsclMaintcnanceViability SNdy (Drafl). (13) WHC-SD-WM-SAR-065, Rev. 0 (Drafl). Interim Chapter 3.0, Hazard and Accident Analysis for the Hanford Tank Farms. (14) PNL-10651 (Draft). Development o f a Risk-Based Approach to Hanford Site Cleanup. (15) WHC-SD-WM-TI-711 (Draft). Remediatian and Cleanoul Levels for Hanfard Single-shell Tanks. (16) (Draft) MacFarlanc, ct SI. Probabilistic Safety Assessrncnt for Hanford High-Lcvcl Wastc Tanks. (1 7) DOEIElS-0189. DOE and WA State Depparlmcnt of Ecology Preliminary Draft EIS for the Tank Waste Rcrnediation Systcm (18) WHC-EP-0810, Rev. 1. Impacts of Disposal Syslcm Deign Options on Low-Level Glass Waste Disposal Pcrformancc. (19) PNL-10154 (Drafl). Integrated Risk Assessment &gram: Melhodology and Rrsulls from Qualilativc Evaluation of Cumnt Hanford

(20) Boathe, G. F., Internal Memo (Predominant Radionuclides in Hanford Waste Tanks) 11/27/95 (21) WAC 173-200-040,Table 1. Ground Water Quality Criteria, Pam IA, IB, IC, and n. (22) Boalhc, G. F., 1996, Predom'mnr Rodionuclidcs in Honford Sir< Wane Tanks, WAC-SD-WM-TI-731, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford

Charadcrization Data Needs for Development. Design, and Operation of Retrieval Equipment Developed Through the DQO Praccss, Table 1-1 and AppendixB.

Flammablc Gas Tank Safety Program: Data Rcquiremsnts for Core Sample Analysis Developed through the DQO Process.

Site Risks to the Public.

Company, Richland, Washington.

A-6


APPENDIX B

STANDARD INVENTORY CONTENT LIMITATIONS

B- I

'm1T I

WHC-SD-Wh4-W-311 Revision 1


B-2

w n 1 1 T


APPENDIX B

STANDARD INVENTORY CONTENT LIMITATIONS

The following sections describe the justification for constituents included in the Standard Inventory.

B1.O STANDARD INVENTORY CONTENT LIMITATIONS ON ANALYTES

This task focuses on providing standard inventory values for those analytes that comprise the bulk of the waste mass. As indicated in column 3 of Table B1.O-1, these 28 analytes account for 99.89 percent of the waste (less water) by mass (Shelton 1996). Table B1 .O-1 primarily includes those components introduced from Hanford waste separation processes. The list is also influenced by safety, risk and regulatory needs, as well as disposal needs.

As depicted in column 5 of Table B1.O-1, inventory reconciliation will be conducted on both a global and tank-specific basis for analytes accounting for at least 0.02 weight percent of the waste (column 2). Inventories of analytes accounting for less than 0.02 weight percent will be reconciled on a tank-specific basis only if it is known that the inventory distribution is concentrated to a few of the 177 tanks (e.g., La, Hg). Global inventories for additional minor components (e.g., Cd, Ag, Cu, Se, Te, Co, Be, Ba, etc.) are to be identified through review of fuel fabrication and flowsheet records.

Table B1.0-1. Analytes Targeted by the Standard Inventory Task. (2 Sheets) I

Column 1

Analyte

NO3 Na

OH

NO2

PO4

co3 AI

1.39 95.15 X X X X I B-3


Table B1.O-1. Analytes Targeted by the Standard Inventory Task. (2 Sheets)

'Shelton (1996). bRanking based on revised global inventory defined by the Standard Inventory effort

(8.5 MT).

B-4


B2.0 STANDARD INVENTORY CONTENT LIMITATIONS ON RADIONUCLIDES

The Predominant Radionuclides in Hanford Site Waste Tanks document (Boothe 1996) provides the basis to consider 40 radionuclides as part of the Standard Inventory Estimate task. The predominant radionuclides defined by Boothe (1996) are radionuclides that are estimated to present over 99 percent of the inherent risks in each of five categories: (1) long-term or short-term inhalation hazards; (2) long-term groundwater hazards; (3) long- term external radiation hazards; (4) short-term shielding concerns; and (5) short-term volatile hazards. An additional six (6) radionuclides (Y-90, Ba-l37m, Eu-155, Cm-242, em-243 and Pu-242) were added to the list of 40 due to their impact on source term. The resulting 46 radionuclides are listed in Table B2.0-1. As depicted in column 3 of Table B2.0-1, approximately 100 percent of the tank waste activity (DOE 1996) is associated with 16 of the 46 radionuclides.

As indicated in Table B2.0-1 (column 4), both global and tank-specific inventories will be developed for each of the 46 radionuclides. The ORIGIN2 model is utilized to generate the global values, and the HDW model (Rev. 4) will partition global inventories among the 177 tanks. The Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes document will include an in-depth discussion of the methodology used to determine radionuclide inventories.

Table B2.0-1. Radionuclides Targeted by the Standard Inventory Task (2 Sheets) Column 1 I Column 2 I Column 3 I Column 4 I Column 5

Radionuclide %A Activity'

C% Activity

Standard Cited in inventory

Rev. 4 (To be issued)

Sr-90 I 30.39 I 30.39 1 X I X I Xb I X I Y-90 1 30.39 I 60.78 I X I X I Xb I I x Cs-137 I 19.75 I 80.53 I X I X I Xb I X I Ba-137111 18.73 Sm-151 Ni-63 0.15 99.16 X Am-24 1 0.06 X X Pu-241 0.04

B-5

Table B2.0-1. Radioni

Column 1 I Column 2 Column 3 Column 4

Eu-155 I 0.03

% Column 5

Eu-154 Sb-125

Tc-99 Pu-239 Cd-113m 0.01

0.01

0.01 CO-60 0.00

E% Activity

99.89

Pu-240 I 0.00

Standard inventory

Global Tank HDW model

Rev. 4 (To be issued)

X X X

=--+--e Ni-59

Boothe (1996)

X X X X X

Zr-93 Nb-93m Eu-152 Pu-238 Se-I9 Sn-126 U-238 Pa-23 1

Source term

X

Cm-244 I O.O(

99.92

U-232 I O.O(

X X I Xb

99.96 X X X

99.98 99.99

100.00

100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

X X X x X X

x X X x X Xh

x X Xh

x X X x X X x X X x X X

100.00

100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

100.00 100.00 100.00

x X X x X Xb x X X x X X x X X x X X x X Xb x X X

100.00 I x I x I Xh

100.001 x I x I x

X

X X X X

X

B-6

WHC-SD-WM-W-3 11 Revision 1

Column 2

%A

Table B2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5

C% Standard Cited in Column 1

Radionuclide

Am-243 1-129 Cm-243

U-235 Ru-106 Ac-221 U-233 U-236 Pu-242 Th-229 Ra-226 Th-232 Ra-228

Source term

X

'DOE 1996 and Boothe 1996 bFinal Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) radionuclides which will receive more in-

depth treatment in HDW model, Rev. 4.

B-7



B-8


B3.0 REFERENCES

Boothe, G . F., 1996, Predominant Radionuclides in Hanford Site Waste Tanks, WHC-SD-WM-TI-731, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

DOE, 1996, Dr@ Environmental Impact Statement for the Tank Waste Remediation System, DOE/EIS-O189D, U.S. Department of Energy and Washington State Department of Ecology, Richland, Washington.

Shelton, L. W., 1996, Chemical and Radionuclide Inventory for Single and Double-Shell Tanks, Internal Memo to D. J. Washenfelder, 74A20-96-30, dated February 28, 1996, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

B-9



m r n I

B-10


APPENDIX C

STANDARD INVENTORY/TANK CHARACTERIZATION REPORT INTEGRATED

SCHEDULE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

c-1



c-2

WHC-SD-WM-W-311 Revision 1

APPENDIX C

STANDARD INVENTORYITANK CHARACTERIZATION REPORT INTEGRATED SCHEDULE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Figure C-1 presents the integrated schedule for the Standard Inventory and Tank Characterization Report (TCR) efforts in fiscal year 1997. Table C-1 defines the Tank Coordinator and Standard Inventory author assignments by tank. The Tank Coordinators are responsible for coordinating the TCR documentation, and the Standard Inventory authors are responsible for reconciling tank inventories and documenting the results for incorporation into both the Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes document and the respective TCR.

c-3

I l l I 1

. , , . , . . , . . . . . , .

, I . . , , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I , , , , , , , , . . . . . . . . . , , I , , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . I , , I , I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.......... ~ ................

, I : ;Wn i-l-*&, I .

iZjk&&&A-lOl'(H%%

w.E.i,;oL(+b.+yi. . . . . . . . . . g+-gtyi'""Tyl ~

. . . . . . . . P i i I i i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , I I . , I t :w . . . . . . . : : G w : : : I I , ,

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I , I . I I j-p , . , / , , , , , , , I , , I . . . . . . . . . .

, . , . ..... 1 ................ ~. , . , . I . . , . , I , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

*U:lda(Hgldy)i j j j J; : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

, I I I , 1 , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I , I , , . . I .

Tank Waste Invenlory Phase V

BesI Baris

W B - l 0 2 ( B o l d l ) :

, . I , ,

, I I I I , , . , I I

. , , : : :+++T.fob(L : : :""I j I : , I , , , , I I I I , .w I , . . , , I , . ,

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I.. ..l.....L1..l.l....

B(B0nheim) j j j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iA:l62(Hbky)I j [ , , , . . . . . . . . gley,; j ; I j j ; I rfi-lOl\Hg+$ i ; i . . . . . . . ...,......., ....,.. ~ ...... . . . . . . . . . .

, , . , I . , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I . , , I , . . ,

?=E=?! i j j : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , I I , . I

: : : : : , ; u":,

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . , I I . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....................... :-A-lT :e: : : : : :-I j : , , .&IKi-l:o , I , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Figure C-1 . Integrated Standard Inventory/Tank Characterization Report Schedule. (Sheet 2 of 3)

c-5


Figure C-1 . Integrated Standard InventoryRank Characterization Report Schedule.


Table C- 1. Tank Coordinator and Standard Inventory Author Assignments by Tank. (Sheet 1 of 4)

I AP-105 1 RUTH SCHREIBER I LOU SHELTON I REX TnOMPSON -0J SnE-TON AP-106

AP-'07 ; .-RxTkE!E!!?ER. - . . .. . . . . LOJ SHE-TON . ___

JOnh 0ALDW.N TERRY WINWARD

c-I


Table C-1. Tank Coordinator and Standard Inventory Author Assignments by Tank. (Sheet 2 of 4)

C-8



T-108 T-1 09 T-110 T-I 11

JOHN BALDWIN BRUCE HIGLEY JOHN CONNER PENNEY COLTON

- DENNIS MCCAIN MIKE KUPFER JOHN BALDWIN MIKE KUPFER

T-112 T-201 T-202 T-203 T-204

TX-101

REXTHOMPSON TERRY WINWARD ALBERT HU TERRY WINWARD

REX THOMPSON TERRY WINWARD AL KRUGER TERRY WINWARD

WAYNE WINKELMAN TERRY WINWARD LUTHER BUCKLEY STEVE LAMBERT



c-10

To From Distribution TWRS Process Engineering Project TitlelWork Order Work Plan for Defining a Standard Inventory Estimate for Wastes Stored in Hanford Site Underground Tanks, WHC-SD-WM-WP-311, Revision 1

Text Name MSIN With All Text

Attach. Only

DISTRIBUTION RE-IXNE DUE TO A MISSING PAGE

Central Files A3-88 X DOE Reading Room H2-53 X

Page 2 of 3 Date 10128196 EDT No. ECN No. 164788

Attach*' EDT/ECN Appendix only only

Fluor Daniel Hanford. Inc. D. J. Washenfelder

Fluor Daniel Northwest S. K. Baker C. H. Brevick A. 0. Wogen

Lockheed Martin Hanford Cornoration M. R. Adams H. L. Boston, 111 A. L. Boldt T. M. Brown J. W. Cammann B. A. Higley K. M. Hodgson J. 0. Honeyman J. W. Hunt T. J. Kelley N. W. Kirch J. G. Kristofzski M. J. Kupfer M. A. Payne L. W. Shelton B. C. Simpson J. P. Sloughter R. A. Watrous

S7-40

H5-49 S3-10 R1-30

R2-12 G3-21 H5-49 R2-12 R2-12 H5-27 R2-11 G3-2 1 R2-12 S7-21 R2-11 R2-12 H5-49 S7-84 H5-49 R2-12 R2-54 H5-27

X

X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

A-6000-135 (01/93) WEF067

DISTRIBUTION SHEET To Distribution

From Page 1 of 3 TWRS Process Engineering Date 10/28/96

Project Title/Work Order Work Plan for Defining a Standard Inventory Estimate for Wastes Stored in Hanford Site Underground Tanks, WHC-SD-WM-WP-311, Revision 1

DISTRIBUTICN RE-IYXJE DUE To A MISSING PAGE

U.S. Deuartment of Enerw-Richland Ouerations Office N. R. Brown K6-5 1 X R. A. Gilbert K6-5 1 X W. Liou s7-54 X J. F. Thompson s7-54 X N. W. Willis s7-54 X

EDT No. ECN No. 164788

Borsheim Associates G. L. Borsheim

&&@ Y. G. Noorani

Name

Meier Associates R. T. Winward

Attach*’ EDTlECN Text

Only MSIN WithAU Text Appendix

Attach. Only Only

H5-27 X

s7-73 X

R2-11 X

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory S. F. Bobrowski K7-28 X K. D. Brant N. G. Colton S. J. Harris

K7-28 X K2-40 X K7-22 X

SAIC M. D. LeClair (4) H5-49 X

A-6000-135 (01193) WEF067

To From Distribution TWRS Process Engineering Project TitldWork Order Work Plan for Defining a Standard Inventory Estimate for Wastes Stored in Hanford Site Underground Tanks, WHC-SD-WM-WP-311, Revision 1

Text Name MSIN WithAll Text

Attach. Only

SGN Eurisvs Services Corporation S. L. Lambert H5-27 X D. E. Place H5-27 X

Page 3 of 3 Date 10/28/96 EDT No. ECN No. 164788

Attach'' EDT/ECN Appendix Only Only

OFFSITE

WS ComDany 5314 Arbustos Court NE Albuquerque, NM 871 11

W. W. Schulz

A-6000-135 (01193) WEF067

Documents

3. 5. [I/67531/metadc676750/m2/1/high... · -ASME Coded kam Human Factor ... Work Plan for Defining a Standard Inventory Estimate for Wastes Stored in Hanford Site ... HD W Model