Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A
Program InformationProgram Information (IR Office)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative
Program Name: Automotive Collision Repair CIP Code: 470603Program Coordinator: Jon Beckham Program Prefix: ABRDivision: Automotive Technology & Transportation Division Chair: Rueben Buice
B
Award InformationAward Information (Division Secretary) (College Catalog)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative
AATCERSTC
Award Title Credit Hours Semester Contact Hours
Award 1 CER Automotive Collision Repair 58 1,648Award 2 STC Automotive Collision Repair 28 1,024
C
Trenholm State Community College Page 1 / 36
Enrollment InformationEnrollment Information – Unduplicated Headcount/Fall Semester of Review Year (IR/ITOffices) (RGTES)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative
Total Enrollment STC CERT AAT
FA2015 17
Fall Semester Enrollment Trends (Unduplicated) (IR/IT Offices) Fall 2015 Fall 2014 Fall 2013 Fall 2012
New Students 4 8 12 7 Program Enrollment 17 30 29 23 Program Graduates 0 3 1 1
Credit Hours Produced 203.00 329.00 295.00 259.00 Exit Students 3 6 2 3 Student FTE 15 24 22 20
Fall Semester Review Year Enrollment Demographics (IR/IT Offices)
Gender/Status Total Male Female FullTime PartTimeHeadcount 17 17 0 14 3Program % 100% 100% 0% 82% 18%
Race White Black Hispanic Native American Asian Multirace Unknown Other
Headcount 3 14 0 0 0 0 0 0Program % 17.6% 82.35% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
<18 1819 2021 Under 21 2224 2529 3034 3539 4049 5064 65+
0 4 4 2 4 0 1 1 1 0
(SHUHC)
Trenholm State Community College Page 2 / 36
D
Program Performance TrendsProgram Performance Trends (IR/IT Offices) (COE Report)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative
Award 2012 2013 2014 2015 Completion Rate STC N/A N/A N/A N/A Cert 72.20 80.00 65.00 69.00Placement Rate STC N/A N/A N/A N/A Cert 76.9 81.00 100 94.00Licensure Rate STC N/A N/A N/A N/A Cert N/A N/A N/A N/ARetention Rate 29.17% 33% 50% 57.14%Fall FTE Students 20 22 24 15
2012 2013 2014 2015 Fall FTE Faculty 1 1 1 1 Fall Student/TeacherRatio 20 to 1 22 to 1 24 to 1 15 to 1
Fall Total Credit Hours 259.00 295.00 329.00 203.00 Fall Credit Hours/FTE Faculty 259 295 329 203
Completions (IPEDS)SU11SPR12 SU12SPR13 SU13SPR14 SU14SPR15 STC 3 CER 9
STC1CER5
STC 2CER 2
STC 7CER 3
E
Program Satisfaction TrendsE. Program Satisfaction Trends (IR Office/Program Coordinator)
Trenholm State Community College Page 3 / 36
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative
201011 201112 201213 201314 201415
EmployerSatisfaction
Excellent30%Very Good30%Good40%
No dataavailable
No dataavailable
No dataavailable
No dataavailable
StudentSatisfaction
Excellent45.8%Good41.7%Average12.5%
No dataavailable
No dataavailable
No dataavailable
No dataavailable
AlumniSatisfaction
Excellent75.0%Very Good25.0%
Excellent100%
Excellent66.7%Very Good33.3%
No dataavailable
Excellent50%Good50%
Completer Satisfaction Yes100% Yes100% Yes100% Yes100% Yes100%
AdvisoryCommittee Satisfaction
Excellent50%Good50%Fair0% Poor0%
Strongly Agree40%Agree60%Disagree0%StronglyDisagree0%
No dataavailable
Excellent60%Good40%Fair0% Poor0%
No dataavailable
Program coordinators should describe how they plan to address the issuesexpressed in surveys, if necessary. Program Rectification:1. Base upon data that is available build better working relationship with employerof students and use employer input to train students upon strengths andweakness.
2. Ensure that all surveys are complete and returned for timely analysis.
3. Work closely with advisory committee members to identify area that needimprovements.
4. Incorporate more realworkplace skills into lab activities.
Trenholm State Community College Page 4 / 36
5. Incorporate more soft/skills in lesson plan activities.
F
Program Cost/Investment TrendsF. Program Cost/Investment Trends (Business Office/Program Coordinators)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative
201213 201314 201415
Instructional Cost* 102,611.34 112.638.45 135,929.57
Equipment
Maintenance/Replacement 1,327.92 0.00 A/C Recycling Machine
New Equipment
(not replacement of nonrepairable equipment)
Two Sata Jet 4000 HVLP SprayGuns Two Plastics Hot Stapler, TwoAnesta Iwata Super Nova SprayGuns
*Includes salary, benefits and other expenses.
Equipment Description. List equipment either replaced or purchased. (ProgramCoordinators)
Trenholm State Community College Page 5 / 36
Description 201213
201314 201415
Equipment Replacement A/C Recycling and Recovery Machine
New Equipment (not replacement ofnonrepairableequipment)
Pneumatic hammer, Two Sata jet paint gun, Two AnestaIwata paint guns, Aluminum repair station and Resistant SpotWelder
NOTE: If equipment was donated by another source, you must note it here.
Sources
14144_rev._a_34788ni for ABR 2015
168385_SATAjet4000B_en for ABR 2015
aluminumweld station brochure for ABR 2016
i4brochure For ABR 2016
Supernovacatalog LS400 for ABR 2015
G
Program Opportunities/Industry TrendsProgram Opportunities/Industry Trends
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative Hourly Wage Rates (IE Office/Department of Industrial Relations Labor Market Infowww2.dir.state.al.us/OES/Wage)
Trenholm State Community College Page 6 / 36
Occupational Title Est.Employment
Entry LevelWage
AverageWage
ExperiencedWage
Automotive Body & RelatedRepairers 270 13.82 20.24 23.45
Manufacturing Car PlantAssembler 150 22.00 24.50 26.50
Car Manufacturing PartSupplier 200 12.00 15.00 17.00
Occupational Employment Projections (IE Office/ALDIR Labor Market Information http://www2.dir.state.al.us/OES/Wage)
ProjectedEmployment
2020
GrowthRate
Total AnnualOpenings Growth Replacement
Occupational Title State Local State Local State Local State Local State LocalAutomotive Body &Related Repairers 2,760 210 1.28 1.01 80 5 35 5 45 5
Automotive GlassInstallers &Repairers
340 1.26 10 5 5
Industry Partner Job Opening Projections (Program Coordinator) Industry 1218 Months 25 Years 10 Years Car Manufacturing Plant 125 250 500 Car Manufacturing Supplier 175 300 700
Anticipated Industry Trends That Will Affect Changes in Curriculum and/orTrenholm State Community College Page 7 / 36
Equipment (Program Coordinator)
Description of Anticipated Change Timeframe in WhichChanges Will Be Needed
Introduction of Aluminum unibody Structure. Fall 20162017 Need for additonal training in Aluminum NonStructural bodyrepair,Aluminum Welding, Aluminum Structural Repair. Fall 20162017
Need for multipurpose welding equipment. Aluminum,Steel,Silicon Bronze Fall 2016 2017
H
Program Goals and ObjectivesProgram Goals and Objectives
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative
Trenholm State Community College Page 8 / 36
Program Performance
Results
College WidePrevious year (IR Office)
Program PreviousYear
(IR Office)
Objective Next Year (Program Faculty)
Enrollment PercentChange
(Previous Fall Term2014 to Fall Term2015)
FA2015 1402FA2014 1338
4.78
FA2015 17FA2014 30
43.3
FA 2016201850% increase
Completion Rate 78% STC N/A CER 69% CER 75%
Placement Rate 90% STC N/ACER 94% CER 95%
Licensure PassageRate 87% STC N/A
CER N/A N/A CER and STC
Retention Rate 55% 57.14% 75%
Student/TeacherRatio 15:1 15:1 25:1
Credit Hours/FTEFaculty14,362/68
211 203:1 215:1
% of ProgramsAchieving ViabilityCriteria
Certificate 8%
Associates 42%
ABR Program does notmeet program viability
Increase programviability to collegestandards.
Program Viability Data* 3Year Average SU11SPR12 SU12SPR13 SU13SPR14 ABR 3 5 2 3*Based on ACHE Criteria for Program Viability: Program must have a minimum average of 7.5graduates during a threeyear period, with the viability being calculated for each award levelseparately. Only long certificates and associate degrees are used in the calculations. Source:IPEDS Completions
Trenholm State Community College Page 9 / 36
Program EnhancementGoals Goal Statement (Program Faculty)
Curriculum Revisions
Curriculum has been upated to ICAR (PDPEE)Professional Development Program Education Edition.Curriculum offer live online ICAR class which willaward student with platium certificate in Paint andrefinishing and nonstructrual repair.Curriculum will offer four additional classes in nonstructural and structural repair and aluminum welding.
Accreditation/Certification Program seeks to attain NATEF accreditation.
Professional Development Instructor will seek additional training course inAluminum welding, Aluminum repair.
EquipmentAdditions/Upgrades Automotive Collision Repair Facilities are under
constructions.
CoOp EducationOpportunities Increase cooperative education opportunites that possibly
result in a higher program place rate and industry awareness.
I
Uniqueness of program (Program Faculty)Note any factors that serve to make this program unique and possibly worthy of continuationeven though it may have low enrollment and or high program costs. Unique programs arethose with special characteristics, special populations, a special market niche, including, butnot limited to, singular program type in a geographical area or section of the state, highpassing rates of graduates on licensure examinations, high placement of graduates in theworld of work, high student GPA performance upon transfer to fouryear institutions, uniqueinstructional methodology employed, special qualities in faculty personnel, special studentspopulation, local, state or national emphasis, public relations value, and other factors.
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative The Automotive Collision Repair Program is the only program of its kind in this area. Thisprogram is a viable part of the community as consumers are waiting longer to purchase newvehicles. The program provides training for area suppliers and industries while stayingabreast of current curriculum requirements. As additional automotive and other industriesTrenholm State Community College Page 10 / 36
abreast of current curriculum requirements. As additional automotive and other industriesmigrate to the school's service area, the need for skilled, professional automotive collisionrepair technicians increases. The program has a automotive collision repair shop on premisesthat is fully equipped to meet the anticipated needs of potential employers.
J.A
Schedule A. Instructional Performance/Student LearningBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths andchallenges utilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggestedplan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedSchedules A, B, C, D, E, and F). Program Coordinators are required to complete allschedules and provide appropriate documentation to support these performancemeasures.
Schedule A. Instructional Performance/Student Learning
Performance Indicators:Student Progress (pre & posttest differences, percent continuing to next course,percent receiving passing grade, percent withdrawal/drop)LearnerCentered Teaching (use of variety of teaching methods multimediapresentation, web delivery techniques [such as email, listerve, and discussion groups],webbased research projects, group projects, peerassisted learning, use of learningstyle assessments, and independent research assignments)Instructor Credentials (percent of faculty meeting SACS standards, percent of facultymeeting Postsecondary standards, number of years of industryrelated experience)Student Satisfaction (classroom engagement, adherence to syllabus, regular feedbackon student performance, supportive of student needs)Adherence to Policy (class starts on time, noshow reports completed on time, proactive intervention occurs on regular basis, office hours maintained, deadlines regularlymet)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative STRENGTHS:
Student Progress Students who complete program score marginally higher on certificationexaminations that those who exit the program after completing several courses. Students are fcusedon safety and shop safety in the process of attining needed skills.
LearnerCentered Teaching – A variety of teaching methods are employed. Programcommunication includes email, discussion groups, research projects, internet researchprojects and real world research projects.
Trenholm State Community College Page 11 / 36
Instructor Credentials –Instructors meet the SACS standards as well as the Postsecondarystandards. Current program coordinator has over 13 years of teaching experience.
Student Satisfaction : Students are fully engaged in the course material and experiences,although many prefer not to study the theory of the trade. Students are sometimes anxiousto begin painting or other technical activities rather than mastering the theory behind thetechnique.
Adherence to Policy – All courses start on time, noshow reports are submitted on time,intervention and counseling is used regularly to retain students. Faculty office hours aremaintained and deadlines are regularly met as possible.
CHALLENGES: Students often enter the program to get the needed skills and then exit theprogram to seek employment. This impacts the rention rate of program completers.
SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION: Council studnets on the importants of completing theprogram. Inform studnets on important of repetitive skill mastery.
J.B
Schedule B. Curriculum and Course(s) of StudyBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths andchallenges utilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggestedplan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedSchedules A, B, C, D, E, and F). Program Coordinators are required to complete allschedules and provide appropriate documentation to support these performancemeasures.
Schedule B. Curriculum and Course(s) of Study
Performance Indicators:Program Enrollment LevelsEnrollment Growth Rate (new student enrollment)Program Advisory Committee Recommendations (attach minutes for current academic year)Industry Surveys (expected trends in curriculum needs)Trade Journal Articles (forecasts of future industry needs)Labor Market Data: Employment Projections (expected curriculum needs)Employer Satisfaction Survey (relevance of program competency emphases)Alumni Satisfaction Survey (relevance of courses and topics covered)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative
Trenholm State Community College Page 12 / 36
STRENGTHS: Program is industry specific and reflects the current trends in the automotiveindustry.
Program Enrollment LevelsProgram currently has 15 students.Enrollment Growth Rate:The enrollemnt growth rate for the program has declined compared to enrollment data for thecollege.
Program Advisory Committee Recommendations: Program Advisory Committeerecommends lab assistant to help monitor progress in laboratory experiences. Its is alsorecmmended that the program seeks NATAF certification.
Industry Surveys: Industry surveys state that automotive body and related repairers areprojected to grow to percent from 2014 to 2024, faster than the average for all occupations.Job opportunities are to be very good for automotive body and glass repairers. The bestopportunities in utomotive body repair will be available to those with industry certification andformal training in automotive body repair and refinishng, and in collision repair. Those withoutany training or experience will ace strong competition for jobs. (www.dol.gov)
Trade Journal Articles:
Labor Market Data: According to data from Department of Labor, automotive body andrelated repaires projected employment in 2014 was 169,100. The projected employment ratefor 2024 is 184,300 indicating a 9% increase in employment projections.
Employer Satisfaction Survey: According to the 2011 Employer Satisfaction Survey result,30% of employers rate the ABR program as Good, 30% of empllyers rate the ABR program asVery Good, and 40% of employers rate the program as excellent.
Alumni Satisfaction Survey: According to 20142015 Alumni Satisfacotion Survey result,50% of respondents rated their satisfaction as very good and 50% of respondents rated theiras excellent.
CHALLENGES: One of the major challenges in program instruction is dilapidated facilities. SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION: Continue to systematically request funding and additionalfunding to help meet the hanging needs of the program and the industry.
J.C
Schedule C. Facilities, Equipment, and ResourcesBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths andchallenges utilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggestedplan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedTrenholm State Community College Page 13 / 36
plan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedSchedules A, B, C, D, E, and F). Program Coordinators are required to complete allschedules and provide appropriate documentation to support these performancemeasures.
Schedule C. Facilities, Equipment, and Resources
Performance Indicators:Adequacy of Space (determined by Program Advisory Committee, Space Utilization Report,and Student Satisfaction Survey) Environment Conducive to Learning (Student Satisfaction Survey, Completer Exit Survey,Graduate Satisfaction Survey) Adequacy of Resources (Student Satisfaction Survey, Completer Exit Survey, GraduateSatisfaction Survey, Student/Teacher Ratio, Credit Hours/FTE Instructor) Operation of Equipment (Student Satisfaction Survey, Completer Exit Survey, GraduateSatisfaction Survey) Relevance of Equipment (Program Advisory Committee, Alumni Satisfaction Survey)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative According to May 2015 Completer Exit Survey results, 50% of respondents were satisfied withthe classroom facilities and 50% were strongly satisfied with the classroom facilities. ProgramAdvisory Committee members agree that the acquisition of additional equipment makesadequacy of space for instruction a concern.
Environment Conducive to Learning:Students and program advisory committee members believe the environment is conducive tolearning.
Adequacy of Resources:According to the results of the May 2015 Completer Exit Survey, 50% of the respondents weresatisfied with the instruction equipment and 50% were strongly satisfied.
Operation of Equipment:According to the results of the May 2015 Completer Exit Survey, 33% of the respondents weresatisfied with the instructional equipment and 66.6% were strongly satisfied. Relevance of Equipment: According to the results of the may 2015 Completer Exit Survey, 33% of the respondents weresatisfied with the instructional equipment and 66.6% were strongly satisfied.
CHALLENGES: In the face of the economic impact on programs, one challenge has been the availability offunds to make necessary improvements and purchase necessary equipment.Trenholm State Community College Page 14 / 36
SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION:Continue to systematically submit purchase requests and better utilize the space that isavailable.
J.D
Schedule D. Quality of Student ExperienceBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths andchallenges utilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggestedplan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedSchedules A, B, C, D, E, and F). Program Coordinators are required to complete allschedules and provide appropriate documentation to support these performancemeasures.
Schedule D. Quality of Student ExperiencePerformance Indicators:
Student Satisfaction (Overall level of satisfaction, specific high and low points)Completer Satisfaction (Overall level of satisfaction, specific high and low points)Alumni Satisfaction (Overall level of satisfaction, specific high and low points)Student Advising Experience (problems encountered, student satisfaction)Student Development and Student Services (instructor interventions, referralsmade, appointments kept)Assessment and Placement Policies Followed (number of exceptions allowed)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative STRENGTHS:Students experience the industry and skills needed for the industry under supervision ofexperienced instructors. Student Satisfaction: According to May 2015 Completer Exit Survey, overall student satisfaction is 100% for theautomotive collision repair program.Completer Satisfaction:According to May 2015 Completer Exit Survey, overall student satisfaction is 100% for theautomotive collision repair program. Alumni Satisfaction: Overall Alumni Satisfaction is 50% good and 50% excellent for the automotive collision repairprogram.
Trenholm State Community College Page 15 / 36
Student Advising Experience: According to the May 2015 Completer Exit Survey, 50% of the respondents indicated that theywere satisfied with the advising experience and 50% of the respondents indicated that theywere very satisfied with the advising experience.
Student Development and Student Services: Instructor interventions were instrumental in student retention. Student referrals andconferences were conducted to address student needs and goals. Appointments are madeand kept according to posted office availability.Assessment and Placement Policies Followed:
CHALLENGES: The nature of this program gives many students the impression that the majority of theclassroom time will be spent in the laboratory or on the shop floor, so therefore they resentthe classroom theory time.
SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION:Incorporate varies instructional methods to break the monotony of the classroom lecturetime. Create, maintain and offer hybrid course supplements using the Moodle platform toallow for more laboratory experience contact time.
J.E
Schedule E. Institutional SupportBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths and challengesutilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggested plan of action you havethat will address strengths or challenges. (See attached Schedules A, B, C, D, E, andF). Program Coordinators are required to complete all schedules and provideappropriate documentation to support these performance measures.
SCHEDULE E: Institutional Support
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative STRENGTHS:Instructor is able to make key decisions concerning program and perpetuate change andrevisions in the program. Services, support and supervision is aligned to provide theinstructor with the needed chain of command to effect change. Instructor has institutionalfreedom to plan, budget, provide input in human resource decisions and submit institutionalresearch data.
Trenholm State Community College Page 16 / 36
CHALLENGES: The nature of automotive collision repair work often makes it difficult to schedule office timeto complete necessary paperwork, and reports. The shop, when occupied with students,requires constant monitoring.SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION:Take advantage of the work study program to enlist the help of a student worker to help fileand maintain paperwork.
J.F
Schedule F. Overall Quality of ProgramBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths and challengesutilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggested plan of action youhave that will address strengths or challenges. (See attached Schedules A, B, C, D, E, andF). Program Coordinators are required to complete all schedules and provide appropriatedocumentation to support these performance measures.
Schedule F: Overall Program Quality
Performance Indicators:Employer Satisfaction (overall level of satisfaction)Alumni Satisfaction (overall level of satisfaction)Completer Satisfaction (overall level of satisfaction)Student Satisfaction (overall level of satisfaction)Completion Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Enrollment Level/Growth Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average, program coordinators should explain increase and/or decrease in enrollments)Retention Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Attrition Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Placement Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Licensure/Certification Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Advisory Committee Satisfaction (versus prior years, versus institutional average)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative STRENGTHS:Overall, the program is growing and meeting the needs of the industry. Satisfaction rates are verygood and excellent. The completion rates and enrollment rates remain steady. Advisory CommitteeSatisfaction has improved and continues to improve as revisions to curriculum continue to improve theprogram. Employer Satisfaction:
Trenholm State Community College Page 17 / 36
Alumni Satisfaction:Overall Alumni Satisfaction is 50% good and 50% excellent for the automotive collision repairprogram. Completer Satisfaction:According to the May 2015 Completer Exit Survey, overall student satisfaction is 100% for theautomotive collision repair program. Student Satisfaction:Completion Rate:Enrollment Level/Growth Rate:The Enrollment Level/Growth Rate had decreased compared to prior years due to lack ofability to benefit, WIOA funding and scholarship recipients.
Retention Rate:Attrition Rate:
Placement Rate:Licensure/Certification Rate:Advisory Committee Satisfaction:
CHALLENGES: Job placement has been and remains a challenge for this program. Many students desire to becomeentrepreneurs initially and therefore do not plan to or prepare to become employees. SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION:Increase community partnerships to create additional opportunities for job placement forprogram completers.
K.1
Program AttachmentsIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY: 1. Include the following as program attachments:
a. Program description and course descriptions (copy from current college catalog)
b. Degree plan/Program(s) of Study
c. Syllabi of courses with embedded speech and computer skills development (may not beapplicable to all programs) Associate Degree only!
Trenholm State Community College Page 18 / 36
d. Submit four additional syllabi. (If appropriate, two from 100 level courses and two from 200level courses). (One year) certificate programs are to submit two syllabi. Specializedemphasis course submit one. All syllabi must indicate requirements for students to utilizecollege learning resources.
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative Through theory and laboratory course, students are introduced to design and proper repairprocedures of automotive unibody and body over frames vehicles. This includes repair orreplacement of metal panels as well as paint and refinishing of vehicle body and plastic partthat need refinishing. These course syllabus which have been select are just a few of courseoffer in automotive collision repair. These course are designed for students to gain a generalknowledge base and master each skill set.
Sources
Automotive Collision Repair Catalog 2015
SYLLABUS (Paint Defects & Final Detail FA2015)ABR265
SYLLABUS (Safety and Environmental Practices SP2015) ABR 151
SYLLABUS (STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SP2016)
SYLLABUS ABR 123 (Paint Applications & Equipment)SP2015
K.2
Student Learning OutcomesIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:
List student learning outcomes for the program: (“When the student completes the programhe/she will be able to...”)
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative Student learning outcomes are what is expected of a student to learn. In collision repairlearning outcomes are used in theory and lab activities and knowledge skills abilitiesTrenholm State Community College Page 19 / 36
learning outcomes are used in theory and lab activities and knowledge skills abilitiesindicator.Therefore broken down into professional competences and student learning objectivewhich broken into enabling objective for skill mastery. Collision repair is base upon repetitiveskill mastery until student gain a member of each task.
Sources
NonStructural Panel Repair Student Learning Outcome 2016
Surface_Preparation Student Learning Outcomes Program Review 2016
K.3
Graduate Student SurveysIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:
Discuss results of graduate student surveys and indicate how you have modified yourcurriculum for program improvement based on the surveys. Attach copies of surveys andresults.
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative Survey results were very favorable towards Automotive Collision Repair program but there isalways room for improvement.With new collision repair facilities under construction on Patterson campus I believe thatgraduates and current student will be very impressed with overall experience at TrenholmState. Areas in which I feel need improvement are instructional equipment and classroom sizeare current under development and this will also improve student enrollment and programgrowth.
Sources
TS 2015 Completer Exit Survey by Program
Trenholm State Community College Page 20 / 36
K.4
Employer SurveysIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:
Discuss results of employer surveys and the level of satisfaction among business and industryclients with Trenholmtrained employees.
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative No data available.
Sources
TS 2014 Employer Satisfaction Assesment ABR
K.5
Program Advisory CommitteeIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:
Discuss changes/improvements you have made in your program/curriculum as a result ofProgram Advisory Committee recommendations and feedback. Attach copies of meetingminutes.
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative In Automotive Collision Repair Industry vehicle are under consistent change an as aprogram of training it is necessary to improve curriculum to include everychange development in repair process. In addition it is very important that collision repair hasa program advisory committee that is committed to success of Trenholm State CommunityCollege. Our members of are second to none in there field of training and apply theirTrenholm State Community College Page 21 / 36
College. Our members of are second to none in there field of training and apply theirknowledge and skill willingly to faculty and students in Collision Repair at Trenholm State.
Sources
2013_Advisory Committee Survey
ABR Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes May 10 2015
ABRMinutes5292014064
Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes ABR52914
Advisory Meetings 2013
Automotive Collision Repair ABR 4813
K.6
Outcome AssessmentIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:
Discuss changes/improvements you have made in your program/curriculum as a result ofoutcome assessment as documented through institutional effectiveness. Attach copies of theprogram’s outcome assessment information located in the institutional effectivenessdocuments.
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative Curriculum that has helped improve this program are ICAR Enhanced Delivery (PDPEE)Designed with extensive input from the collision repair industry, PDP training gives collisionrepair professionals and insurance auto physical damage appraisers the rolerelevantinformation, knowledge and skills they need to perform complete, safe and quality repairs.Businesses that invest in PDP training benefit from improved business performance, enhancedemployee development and reduced risks.In the PDP, each professional develops their skills through a distinct training path tailored totheir role. The progressive training is designed to continually build upon their existingknowledge, and is regularly updated to reflect current collision repair techniques. For thesereasons, the PDP is recognized as the industry standard for training in the collision repairindustry.
Trenholm State Community College Page 22 / 36
Sources
201112AdministrativeSupportServicesUnitPlans
K.7
Previous Program ReviewIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:
Discuss progress and changes made based on recommendations from the last programreview. Information not available.
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative No recommendations form last program review.
K.8
Other DocumentationIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:
Discuss and or/attach other supporting documentation (memos, letters of support, etc.)related to the program. No information available.
Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative No information available.
Trenholm State Community College Page 23 / 36
Checklist
Checklist Instructions: Check “Yes” if the data is complete and “No” if the data isincomplete. Missing or incomplete items should be addressed with the program coordinator,who will then be given opportunity to complete the data before the summary portion of thisform is completed.
YES NO PROGRAM REVIEW ITEM COMMENTS x A. Program Information x B. Award Information x C. Enrollment Information x C. Enrollment Trends x C. Enrollment Demographics x D. Program Performance Trends
x E. Program Satisfaction Trends Employer and student satisfaction datanot provided
x F. Program Cost/Investment Trends
x G. Program Opportunities – HourlyWage Rates
x G. Occupational EmploymentProjections
x G. Industry Partner Job OpeningProjections
x G. Anticipated Industry Trends x H. Program Goals and Objectives x I. Uniqueness of program
Checklist Instructions: Check “Yes” if the data is complete and “No” if the data isincomplete. Missing or incomplete items should be addressed with the program coordinator,who will then be given opportunity to complete the data before the summary portion of thisform is completed.
Trenholm State Community College Page 24 / 36
YES NO PROGRAM REVIEW ITEM COMMENTS
x J. Schedule A – InstructionalPerformance/Student Learning
x J. Schedule B – Curriculum andCourse(s) of Study
x J. Schedule C – Facilities,Equipment, and Resources survey data used in narrative
x J. Schedule D – Quality ofStudent Experience
more specifics about the types of instructionalmethods that were proposed should bedelineated
x J. Schedule E – InstitutionalSupport
x J. Schedule F – Overall Quality ofProgram
Retention, attrition and placement rate notprovided in this section
x K. Overall Program Summary andRecommendations
x Attachments – Programdescription and coursedescriptions
x Attachments – Degree plans
x
Attachments – Syllabi of courseswith embedded speech and
computer skills
x Attachments – Four additionalsyllabi
x Attachment – Student outcomesfor program
x Attachment – Discussion ofresults of graduate surveys
x Attachment – Discussion ofresults of employer surveys No narrative was provided
x
Attachment – Discussion ofchanges/improvements made toprogram
based on Advisory Committeerecommendations
No specific changes/improvements related tothe Advisory Committee was provided
x
Attachment – Discussion ofchanges/improvements made
to program as a result ofassessment
Attachment Discussion ofprogress/changes made as a
Trenholm State Community College Page 25 / 36
xprogress/changes made as aresult of
last program review
Narrative stated that there were norecommendations from the last program review
x Attachments – Other supportingdocumentation related to program No additional information provided
Program Coordinator to revise discrepancies noted by the Program ReviewEvaluators
within 30 days from notification.
Date Notified:
Summary
Summary Instructions: Based upon the information in the Comprehensive Program Review,comment on the following areas concerning the program.
STRENGTHS OF THE PROGRAM: The strength of the program is the creativity of the instructor in maintaining his work spaceand the instructional space of the facility the program is housed in. The space is large andcan accommodate a variety of instructional learning activities simultaneously. Theprogram utilizes the latest repair technology to instruct students on welding, shop safety,metal straightening, fiberglass repair and preparing damage estimates. Students obtain skillsthat include all phases of auto body repair, which will immediately prepare them foremployment. The program has a good collaboration with local industry. CHALLENGES OF THE PROGRAM: Program retention and ultimately program completion present a challenge. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT:
Trenholm State Community College Page 26 / 36
Work with appropriate college staff to use social media to advertise the program in the greaterMontgomery area.Work with students to ensure completion of general studies courses. OVERALL PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION:(Place an "X" next to your recommendation)
Continued for the next fiveyear cycle with the expectation of increasing enrollments.
x Continued for the next fiveyear cycle with the expectation of maintaining currentenrollments. Continued for the next fiveyear cycle with the expectation of decreasing enrollments. Closely monitored and considered for phaseout during the next fiveyear cycle.
Program Terminated Immediately (If this item is checked, a rationale should beincluded)
COMMENDATIONS (Complete this section if the subcommittee found that this program is oneof the Trenholm Tech's exceptional programs.):
OnSite Peer Visit Checklist
Name & Title of Evaluator: Myrtes Dunn Green
Date of Visit: March 27, 2017
Trenholm State Community College Page 27 / 36
ITEM YES NO NOTAPPLICABLE
1. All instructional supplies and equipment meet appropriateand required safety standards. x
2. Safety signs are appropriately placed and visible bystudents and employees. x
3. Emergency Exit signs are appropriately placed and visibleby students and employees. x
4. Material Safety Data Sheets are completed and available forreview. x
5. Fire extinguisher is available and has undergone therequired preventative maintenance checks. x
6. Shop, classroom, and/or lab are clean and free of debris. x 7. First aid supplies are readily available. x
8. Preventative maintenance services are provided to ensurecontinued operation of the facility. x
9. Access to library services is readily available to students. x 10. Access to student services is readily available to students. x
11. Custodial services are available to provide routine care andmaintenance to facility. x
Identify any needed preventative maintenance, equipment needs, etc.:
The shop area needs storage racks along the walls.
Evaluator Rubric
Date of Review: March 27, 2016
Trenholm State Community College Page 28 / 36
CATEGORY EXEMPLARY (3) MEETS EXPECTATIONS(2)
BELOWEXPECTATIONS
(1)SCORE
ProgramSatisfactionTrends
Wellwritten plan toaddress deficienciesidentified by programsatisfaction trends isprovided. If nodeficiencies exist, a planis provided to maintainexemplary status.
An adequate response todeficient programsatisfaction trends isprovided.
Section partiallyor not completed 3
ProgramCost /InvestmentTrends
Program Coordinatorthoroughly describedequipment replaced orpurchased, if applicable.
Program Coordinatorcompleted this section, ifapplicable.
Section partiallyor not completed 3
ProgramOpportunities/ IndustryTrends
Program Coordinatorprovided sufficient datato indicate the jobopenings in the followingcategories: 1218months, 25 years, 10years based onoccupationalemployment dataprovided and input fromindustry partners.
Program Coordinatorpartially completed thissection; however, anexplanation was given asto why this data wasmissing
Section partiallyor not completed 2
ProgramGoals and 3Objectives
Program Coordinatorindicated objectivesfor the next yearbased on the dataprovided. Program Coordinatoralso indicatedstrategies on howthey plan to achievethe next yearobjectives, whichshowed percentageincreases. Program Coordinatorprovided wellwrittenand obtainableprogramenhancement goals.
Program Coordinatorpartially completed thissection; however, anexplanation was given asto why this data wasmissing
Section partiallyor not completed 3
CATEGORY EXEMPLARY (3) MEETS EXPECTATIONS(2)
BELOWEXPECTATIONS
(1)SCORE
Program Coordinatorprovided a wellwrittenTrenholm State Community College Page 29 / 36
Uniquenessof Program
provided a wellwrittendescription of theprogram, specificallydescribing theuniqueness of the2program.
Program coordinatorindicated at least twounique characteristics ofthe program.
Section partiallyor not completed 2
InstructionalPerformance/ Student3Learning
Program Coordinatorprovided a wellwritten response toall 5 performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Substantialdocumentation wasprovided to supportresponses.
Program Coordinatorresponded to at least 3of the 5 performanceindicators and completedthe Strengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan of Actionsections.
Documentation wasprovided to supportresponses.
ProgramCoordinatorresponded toless than 2 ofthe performanceindicators.
3
CurriculumandCourse(s) ofStudy
Program Coordinatorprovided a wellwritten and detailedresponse to all 8performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Program Coordinatorprovided substantialdocumentation tosupport responses.
Program Coordinatorresponded to at least4 of the 8performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Program Coordinatorprovideddocumentation.
ProgramCoordinatorresponded toless than 2 ofthe performanceindicators.
2
Program Coordinator
Trenholm State Community College Page 30 / 36
Facilities,EquipmentandResources
Program Coordinatorprovided a wellwrittenresponse to all 5performance indicatorsand completed theStrengths, Challenges,and Suggestion Plan ofAction sections.
Substantialdocumentation wasprovided to supportresponses.
Program Coordinatorresponded to at least3 of the 5performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Program Coordinatorprovideddocumentation.
ProgramCoordinatorresponded toless than 2 ofthe performanceindicators.
2
CATEGORY EXEMPLARY (3) MEETS EXPECTATIONS(2)
BELOWEXPECTATIONS
(1)SCORE
Quality ofStudentExperience
Program Coordinatorprovided a wellwritten response toall 6 performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Substantialdocumentation wasprovided to supportresponses.
Program Coordinatorresponded to at least3 of the 6performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Program Coordinatorprovideddocumentation
ProgramCoordinatorresponded toless than 2 ofthe performanceindicators.
3
InstitutionalSupport
Program Coordinatorprovided a wellwrittenand detailed response toinstitutional supportprovided by the College.All three categories,Strengths, Challenges,and Suggested Plan ofAction, were thoroughlydescribed.
Program Coordinatorprovided responses to allcategories of Strengths,Challenges andSuggested Plan of Actionfor this section.
Section partiallyor not completed 2
Program Coordinator
Trenholm State Community College Page 31 / 36
OverallQuality ofProgram
Program Coordinatorprovided a wellwritten response toall 11 performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Substantialdocumentation wasprovided to supportresponses.
Program Coordinatorresponded to at least 5of the 11 performanceindicators and completedthe Strengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan of Actionsections.
Program Coordinatorprovideddocumentation.
Section partiallyor not completed 1
ProgramReviewAttachments
Program coordinatorattached the following:
Program descriptionand coursedescriptions; DegreePlan/Program ofStudy Syllabi ofcourses withembedded speechand computer skillsdevelopment (AATonly); 4 additional syllabi(two each from 100and 200 levels must contain use ofcollege library); and Student LearningOutcomes. Syllabisubmitted followcollege guidelinesand are studentfriendly. Responses areprovided for items 38 and are wellwritten and detailed.If data is missing,program coordinatordescribes a plan toensure data iscollected in thefuture. Documentation isattached.
Program coordinatorattached the following:
Program descriptionand coursedescriptions; DegreePlan/Program ofStudy; Syllabi of courseswith embeddedspeech and computerskills development(AAT only); 4 additional syllabi(two each from 100and 200 levels mustcontain use of collegelibrary); and Student LearningOutcomes. Items 38 arecompleted with theappropriatedocumentationattached.
Section partiallyor not completed 2
Trenholm State Community College Page 32 / 36
OverallQuality ofInformationProvided in ProgramReview
Program Coordinatorcompleted all sectionsof the program reviewand responded to eachsection thoroughly withappropriatedocumentation.
Program Coordinatorcompleted 10 of the 12major categories of theprogram review andattached appropriatedocumentation
Responses inprogram revieware poorlywritten.Documentationis limited.5 or more of“MeetsExpectationsindicators” arenot met.
2
Program Review Rubric
Please complete the rubric below.Name of Dean:
Date of Review:
Trenholm State Community College Page 33 / 36
CATEGORY Compliant NonCompliant
NotApplicable
Has the program clearly articulated its programmission, program goals and student learningoutcomes?Is the current curriculum content and designappropriate to enable students to develop theskills and attain the outcomes needed forgraduates of this program?Does the program have adequate facilities,equipment, resources, staff and support services?Has the program been successful in its studentrecruitment, retention, placement, andcompletion/graduation goals?Are faculty competencies/credentials appropriatefor the discipline and degree?Is faculty adequately supported and engaged inongoing professional development necessary forstaying current in their field and continuouslyupdating their courses and curriculum?Does the program assessment plan clearlyarticulate student learning outcomes, assessmenttools, procedures for gathering evidence ofstudent learning?How are the assessment results used to improvethe program and in strategic planning?
Dean's Narrative
NOTE: The narrative should include recommendations and commendations on thePROGRAM, STUDENTS, FACULTY, and ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING. Given the existing strengths and challenges of the program, recommendationsshould be made to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the program. How could the curriculum of this program be improved over the next five years? Trenholm State Community College Page 34 / 36
What actions would be required to accomplish the improvement given current levelof resources (faculty, staff, facilities, equipment, etc.) Provide recommendations and commendations regarding program improvement anddevelopment. Discuss the overall health of the program? Comment on any program specific concerns (i.e., professional accreditationconcerns). Please make any comments regarding aspects of this program not covered in thisreview which you think should be described. Provide general recommendations and commendations.
President's Cabinet Action
Trenholm State Community College Page 35 / 36
President's Cabinet ActionSelectOne Conclusions and Recommendations
President's Cabinet recommends that the College continue the program for thenext five yearsPresident's Cabinet recommends that the College discontinue the program basedon poor performance
2016 Autobody Collision Program Review
Program Name, Program Review Name, ProgramCoordinator
President's Cabinet Action SelectOne Conclusions and Recommendations
President's Cabinet recommends that the College continue the program forthe next five years
President's Cabinet recommends that the College discontinue the programbased on poor performance
President’s Cabinet Recommendations ACTION PLAN 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)
Narrative
Trenholm State Community College Page 36 / 36
