Upload
lehuong
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Traditional Democratic Theory
Policies based on majority will
Minority rights protected
Who holds the power today?
Pluralist Theory
Many groups compete for influence
Large number of access points (federalism)
Policies emerge from bargaining and compromise
Equal access
If no money, groups can use litigation
Hyperpluralist Theory
Too many interest groups
Politicians try to appease all
Policies become confusing and contradictory
Anti-smoking campaign
Tobacco subsidies
Subgovernments (Iron Triangles)
Revolving door
Elite Theory
Policy dominated by the super-rich, corporations, and financial interests
Close connection of money and power due to PACs
2008 recession
Small stimulus checks vs. enormous bailouts
Overview
Interest Group
Organization whose members share policy views on specific issues
Operate at every level of government
Attempt to influence public policy to their benefit
-Typically through money
Overview
As a Linkage Institution
Express members’ preferences to government
Convey policy information to members
Raise and spend money to influence policymakers
Difference from Political Parties
Politicians
Parties
-seek to gain power
Interest Groups
-seek to influence policies
-support sympathetic candidates
Difference from Political Parties
Issues
Parties
-generalists
-appeal to wide range of voters
Interest Groups
-specific issues that affect their members
-better able to articulate clear policy positions
Difference from Political Parties
Accountability
Parties
-elections make them accountable to the public
Interest Groups
-private organizations only accountable to their members
Growth of Interest Groups
Prevalence
Began as business and labor organizations
Now include environmental, consumer, and political groups
Multi-trillion dollar U.S. budget means most organizations want representation and influence over how money is spent and laws are enacted