7. Tall buildings. - FSv ČVUT -- Peoplepeople.fsv.cvut.cz/~machacek/prednaskyOK3E/OK3-7E.pdf · structures, peculiarity of design. ... - tube latticed system, - 103 floors, ... Structural

  • Upload
    lynhu

  • View
    224

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 1

    Antiquity: Earthen bricks + timber floors (4 stories)

    Romans: Bricks + timber (up to 10 stories)Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus (27 BC - 14 AD)ordered max. 21 m - fire

    Middle Ages: Brick, stone, timber, revelled timber, cast iron steel1784 Cort - wrought iron1855 Bessemer - steel

    FRAMES (skeletons):Timber, later steel structure: New York 1854 - 6 stories (wrought iron)Problems: Structure of frames, lifts, installation, walls, fire.

    Lifts: steam 1857 N.Y. (Otis)hydraulic 1870 (Eiffel tower)electrical 1890 (Otis)

    7. Tall buildings. Tall buildings, history, the highest world buildings, types of bracing, tube

    structures, peculiarity of design.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 2

    Antiquity: Earthen bricks + timber floors (4 stories)

    Romans: Bricks + timber (up to 10 stories)Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus (27 BC - 14 AD)ordered max. 21 m - fire

    Middle Ages: Brick, stone, timber, revelled timber, cast iron steel1784 Cort - wrought iron1855 Bessemer - steel

    FRAMES (skeletons):Timber, later steel structure: New York 1854 - 6 stories (wrought iron)Problems: Structure of frames, lifts, installation, walls, fire.

    Lifts: steam 1857 N.Y. (Otis)hydraulic 1870 (Eiffel tower)electrical 1890 (Otis)

    7. Tall buildings. Tall buildings, history, the highest world buildings, types of bracing, tube

    structures, peculiarity of design.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 3

    TALLEST STRUCTURES IN THE WORLD (1/2013)

    TV transmitters1. Transmitter Fargo (North Dakota), 629

    m, (1963)1a. Transmitter Warsaw (Poland), 643

    m, (1974-1991)

    TV towers1. Tokyo Skytree (Japan), 634 m,

    (2012)2. Canton Tower (China), 600 m, (2009)

    Offshore structures1. Petronius platform (USA), 535+75 =

    610 m, (1998)(oil, gas; deflection up to 12 m)

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 4

    BUILDINGSLists are ranked by:

    - the highest point of the building (e.g. antennae, shown in parenthesis)- the top of building (e.g. extension, spires - not shown)- the top of the highest roof (shown as the essential below, state 1/2013)

    1. Burj Khalifa (Dubai) 636 (828) m 20102. Makkah R. Clock Tower (Mecca) 559 (601) m 20123. Shanghai WFC 487 (492) m 20084. Int. Commerce Centre (H.K.) 484 (484) m 2009 5. Taipei 101 449 (508) m 20046. Willis Tower (Sears Tower) 442 (527) m 19747. Kingkey 100 (Shenzhen) 442 (442) m 20118. Guangzhou Int. Fin. Center 438 (440) m 2010X. [World Trade Center N.Y. 417 (526) m 1973-2001]9. Two Inter. Fin. Centre (H.K.) 407 (416) m 2003

    10. 23 Marina (Dubai) 395 (395) m 2012

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 5

    1. Burj Khalifa, Dubai (UAE)

    arch. Adrian Smith (Skidmore, Owings and Merrill)

    Height: 636 (828) mYear: 2009Jan. 2009: reached 828 m,160 storeys, high strength concrete +

    steel; top part (200 m) from steel; max. horiz. deflect. 1,5 m; opening: 1/2010.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 6

    Burj KhalifaButtressed core (Y shaped plan),

    with 3 wings (buttresses) supporting hexagonal core.

    Development of the shape in January 2009 reached 828 m

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 7

    Burj Khalifa founded on 152 piles 1,5 m, length 43 m, concrete up to 586 m, steel to the top, ascent to 768 m, steel spire 200 m (350 t) assembled inside

    and jacked to height of 828 m, double-deck elevators (considered triple-deck)

    Cross sections

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 8

    2. Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel (Saudi Arabia)

    Height: 559 (601) mYear: 2012Arch.: Dar Al-Handasah Architectsconstructed by Saudi Binladin Group.

    - composite steel and concrete structure,

    - 120 storeys,

    - assembly hall for 10 000 pilgrims,

    - accommodation for 100 000 pilgrims,

    - clock 43x43 m (minute hand 22 m),

    - two heavy fires (2008, 2009).Design 2002, construction 2004-12

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 9

    3. Shanghai WFC (China)

    Height: 487 (494) mYear: 2008 (opening 30.8.2008)Arch.: Kohn Pedersen Fox, steel structureSkidmore, Owings and Merrill

    - 101 storeys,

    - originally circular aperture 46 m

    (= sky"), similarity with rising sun

    (Japan. flag) trapezoidal (bottle opener)

    - observation deck: 472 m (94. floor),

    - 2 tuned dampers below the deck,

    - after 11.9.01 design for airplane bump,

    and 2 external lifts added.Proposal 1997 Proposal 2005 and realization

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 10

    Photos from construction

    Shanghai WFC2007 fire due to welding

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 11

    4. International CommerceCentre (H.K.)

    Height: 484 (484) mYear: 2009

    Arch.: Wong & Ouyang (HK),Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates

    Design: Arup

    Built on top of Kowloon station.

    - steel frame with concrete core.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 12

    5. Taipei 101 (TAI)

    Height: 449 (508) mYear: 2004

    Arch.: C. Y. Lee & partners

    - recall a stalk of bamboo (or pagoda),

    - uses the happy "8",

    - 101 storeys,

    - tuned damper 660 t,

    - lifts 1000 m/min,

    - 2002 earthquake 6,8 RS.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 13

    Taipei 101

    View from observation deck Vestibule of the building

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 14

    6. Willis Tower (USA)(formerly Sears Tower)

    Height: 442 (527) mYear: 1974

    Arch.: Skidmore, Owings and Merrill

    - bundled tube system,

    - 110 storeys,

    - 9 tubes" 23 x 23 [m]

    (from 90th story two only),

    - column flanges 609x102 [mm].

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 15

    7. Kingkey 100 (Shenzhen)

    Height: 442 (442) mYear: 2011

    Arch.: Terry Farrell and PartnersStructural Engineer: Arup

    - 100 storeys,

    - observatory at 427 m.

    - under construction:

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 16

    8. Guangzhou Int. Fin. Center(China)

    South of China, 120 km from HK

    Height: 438 (440) mYear: 2006-2010

    Arch.: Wilkinson Eyre (e.g. also Gateshead Millennium Bridge)

    - tube latticed system,

    - 103 floors,

    - observation deck at 100th floor.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 17

    9. Two InternationalFinancial centre (HK)

    Height: 407 (416) mYear: 2003

    Arch.: Rocco Design Ltd. , Csar Pelli: WTC,

    One Canada Square,Petronas Towers ...

    - 88 floors,

    - unhappy numbers" 14, 24 omitted.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 18

    10. 23 Marina (Dubai)

    Height: 395 (395) mYear: 2012

    Arch.: Hafeez Contractor,KEO Int. Consult.

    Design: KEO International Consultants

    - 90 floors,

    - tallest all-residential building.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 19

    Jin Mao Building (China)

    Height: 370 (421) m,Shanghai (Pudong)Year: 1998

    Arch.: Skidmore, Owings and Merrill

    - 88 floors (happy number),

    - 8 composite mega-columns and 8 steel columns,

    - atrium along all height,

    - designed for typhoons 200 km/h and earthquakes

    up to 7 RS.

    Other prominent skyscrapers

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 20

    Tuntex Building (TAI)

    Heights: 348 (378) mYear: 1998Arch.: C. Y. Lee (also Taipei 101)

    - 85 floors.

    Rectorsvisit

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 21

    Aon Center (USA)(Amoco, Standard Oil)

    Height: 346 mYear: 1973

    Arch.: Edward Durell Stone

    - 83 floors.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 22

    John Hancock Center( USA)

    Heights: 343 mYear: 1969

    Arch.: I. M. Pei & Partners

    - 100 floors,- tube system (mega-structure).

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 23

    storeys height [m] construction Ping An Finance Center (Shenzhen) 115 588 (660) 2009-15 Shanghai Tower 128 566 (632) 2008-14 Goldin Finance 117 (Tianjin) 117 597 (597) 2008-15 Lotte World Tower (J. Korea) 123 555 (555) 2011-15 One World Trade Center (N.Y.) 105 419 (542) 2006-13-----

    Federation Tower (Moskva) 93 360 (506) 2003-13

    Visions (realistic only) India Tower 126 (700) 2010-16 Al Burj (Dubai) 228 (1400) in preparation Murjan Tower (Bahrain) ? (1022) in preparation

    BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 24

    The highest buildings in the Czechia

    City Tower (Raiffeisenbank)Height: 108,5 m

    - 24 floors (reinforced concrete core + steel frame)modifications by arch. Richard Meier (USA),

    - year: 2007.

    City Empiria(Motokov)Height: 103,5 m

    - 26 floors (reinf. concrete core + steel frame),- year: 1977.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 25

    Structural systems

    Trend: steel composite high-strength concrete and steel combinationExamples:

    1992 Bank of China H.K., 309 m 4 composite mega-columns;1997 Petronas Tower, 387 m concrete mega-columns, concrete 80 MPa; 1998 Jin Mao B., 371 m 8 compos. mega-col. + concrete core2003 Taipei 101, 448 m 8 compos. mega-col. + core 16 comp. col.

    Fazlur Khan(1930-1982)

    comp

    osite

    mega

    -str

    uct.

    30405060708090

    100110120130140

    2010

    0

    3040 40

    60

    80

    100

    >120

    t bk t

    rm

    o v p

    hra

    dov

    vc e

    number of floors

    frame

    stru

    sses

    core

    sbe

    lts tube systems

    fram

    e truss

    tube

    in tu

    bebu

    ndle

    d tu

    bes

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 26

    Tube systems

    a. Frame tube systems- shell (< 30 % openings) mostly from concrete;- with high horizontal beams (Canary Warf 1 m, column distance 1-3 m);- with truss belts.

    b. Truss tube systems- latticed (Alcoa B. San Francisco).- megastructure (John Hancock).

    c. Multi-tube systems- tube in tube, WTC outer for bending, inner for shear;- bundled tube, Sears Tower.

    facade viewplan view

    concretesteel H/2 H/4

    tube in tube

    bundled tube

    megastructure

    a. FRAME b. TRUSS c. MULTITUBE

    latticed

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 27

    Deflections of tall buildings

    - special systems with belts have deflection of S shape(will be used in dynamic and earthquake calculations).

    piblinpmka: zklady - vrchol

    wall:bending defl.

    frame:shear defl.

    interaction:S shape defl.

    approx. line(basement to top

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 28

    Sears Tower1974 (height 442 m)

    pdorys(9 modul)

    module 22,9 x 22,9 [m]

    0-50

    50-66

    66-90

    90-110

    truss 1 m

    sheeting 73 mm+ concrete 63 mm

    assembly part

    3,9 7,6

    4,6

    technical floor(belt)

    primary beams: flange 406 x 70 [mm]

    columns: flange 609 x 102 [mm]

    5 x 4,6 = 22,9

    77 000 t of steelbetter distribution of stresses

    due to bundled cross section(smaller shear lag)

    cross section

    simple bundled

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 29

    Taipei 1012003 (height 448 + 60 m)

    Ductile steel: Cekv < 0,29 High strength concrete: C69fy = 510 MPa Headed stud shear connectors.fu = 720 MPa

    Level 10 - Tower Framing Plan

    g

    Level 32 - Tower Framing Plan

    10th floor 32th floor

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 30

    EL151.2M

    EL352.8M

    EL319.2M

    EL285.6M

    EL252.0M

    EL218.4M

    EL184.8M

    EL113.4M

    EL79.8M

    EL37.8M

    EL390.6M

    EL448M

    EL508M

    R6-235

    Taipei 101 cross sections

    - 8 composite mega-columns(size 3 x 2,4 [m])

    - core: 16 composite mega-columns (22,5 x 22,5 m), t = 80 mm

    - from 63rd floor steel only

    - interconnected by trusses with heightof 1- 3 floors

    - deflection at top: h/200 = 2,2 m

    - reinforced concrete walls up to 9th floor

    - 380 steel piles 1,5 m filled up byconcrete; into depth of 30 m(expected settlement of 50 mm)

    448 m

    508 m

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 31

    448

    508

    R6-235 Damper 660 t

    (0,24 % G)

    Suspended from 92 to 88 flooron 4 cables, supported by 8 hydraulicpistons.

    Produced by welding of steel platesof 125 mm thickness, coated with gold.

    Tuned mass damper (TMD)(shortening of cables, blocking).

    Taipei 101

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 32

    28th July 1945 8:55

    Empire State Building

    Clouds 120 m above ground, bomber B25 hit 79th floor (at height of 278 m).The bump created opening 5,5 x 6 [m], 13 deads (3 crew),

    floor beam bent about 450 mm, column remained nearly undamaged.

    Apart from building quake, fire and claims no other problems (thanks to structural reserves).

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 33

    Influence of extreme height to building frame

    In addition to usual checks:

    1. Dynamic effects of wind.2. P - effect (2nd order effect).3. Influence of member shortening.4. Static and dynamic rigidity:

    max H/500acceleration a amax 0,015 g

    5. Interaction with ground (especially if H/B > 5).

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 34

    Dynamic effects of wind

    Generally: analysis including vibration: - longitudinal (in the wind direction)

    - lateral (in transversal direction):circular, elliptic shapes: "vortex shedding"rectangular shapes: "galloping" (occurs rarely)

    Vortex shedding, vortex separation(called also Karman periodic set of whirlwinds)results on condition that:

    mcrit 25,15 vnbStnbv

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 35

    Wind loading for area Aref according to EN 1993-1-4:

    - if h 100 m and b > 30 m, coefficient of the structure cscd = 1;- otherwise use detailed method" (depends on natural frequency n ,

    parameters of wind and structure ...)- Eurocode enables to determine even deflection and vibration acceleration.

    refp(Z)fdsw AqcccF =

    force coefficient dynamic wind pressure

    coefficient of the structure

    hn 461

    fictitious cantilever

    w

    h

    b

    i mi

    natural shapes(vibration shapes)

    Longitudinal dynamic wind effects

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 36

    P - effect (2nd order effect)

    Represents effect of horizontal shift on internal forces. Solution:- 2nd order theory (or geometrically nonlinear analysis GNA),- or approximately (see also determination of cr in global analysis):

    If SLS is fulfilled, the approximate guess of V, H (for all building or floor)gives coefficient of 2nd order m. The horizontal loading then multiply with m:

    1

    5001

    1

    500

    11

    111

    111

    1

    Ed

    Ed

    Ed

    Ed

    EdH,Ed

    Edcr

    >

    =

    =

    HV

    /hh

    VHh

    VH

    m

    Iteration procedure:

    1st step base moment:

    next:

    20

    H0VMM +=

    20

    H +

    += VMM

    V h

    b

    V V h/2H

    V

    b

    h

    h/500

    first step other steps

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 37

    Influence of member shortening

    The shortening of member axes is covered by computer FEM analysis!

    Shortening of members due to stress:

    Ehs =s

    Thereof stress of diagonal:2

    sd

    ===

    dh

    ddEE

    The stress in diagonals from vertical loading is, therefore, of the same orderas in columns!

    Measures:- final connection of diagonals not until assembly of all building,- or prestressing of diagonals to eliminate compression due to vertical loading.

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 38

    EarthquakeEarthquake scales, solution of effects, vibration damping.

    Scales:- magnitude scales (number expressing relative size of an earthquake):

    Richter scale, moment magnitude scale (Mw), also other like Ms, Mb etc.

    - intensity scales (describe the severity of effects on structures):Modified Mercalli scale (MMI, MCS), Rossi-Forel scale etc.

    P - waveshypocentre

    epicentreseismicvibration

    S - w

    aves

    Waves:P - primary (direct, fast, push-pull);S - secondary (transversal, shear, slower);Q - Love waves (no vertical movement);R - Rayleigh waves (surface waves, with

    both vertical and horizontal movements).

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 39

    Richters scale:Charles Richter 1935 (California Institute of Technology)

    Logarithmic scale of released energy (each magnitude increases energy 1000 = 31,6 x):

    M = log10 A (mm) + distance correlation factor

    (usually based on recording time of seismograph station)

    Earthquakes are: moderate (4-5), strong (6-8), great (> 8).

    Since 1900: Casualties:

    1. Chile 1960 9,5 1. China 1556 830 0002. Alaska 1964 9,2 2. Sumatra 2004 283 1063. Alaska 1957 9,1 3. China 1976 255 0004. Kamchatka 1952 9,0 4. Syria 1138 230 0005. Sumatra 2004 9,0 5. Iran 56 200 000

    A (amplituda)A (amplitude)

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 40

    Mercalli scale:Subjective, determination of "zones".

    USA: MMI (Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale), 12R: MCS (Mercalli-Cancani-Siber, SN 73 0036)

    1 - 4 not felt,5 - 7 felt by everyone, slight damages,

    (Czechia: A, Pimda, Liberec, Trutnov, Opava) 8 - 12 great and destroying damages.

    Eurocode (EN 1998):Maps of ground design accelerations agR.

    Analysis:- not necessary for agR1S < 0,05 g.

    1 ... coefficient of the building significance (0,8 - 1,4);S ... ground parameter (1,0 - rock, up to 1,6).

    - Introduced so called design spectrum" Sd(T)(= acceleration a, depending on ground and natural period of the structure T).

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 41

    Map of Czechia according to EN 1998-1:

    Seismic mapof the Czech Republic

    ground design accelerations agR

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 42

    very highbuildings

    Analysis of earthquake effects1. Direct (response of the structure from ground movement)

    2. Approximate (suitable for small earthquakes)- uses an equivalent static horizontal loading:

    accel.(up to 0.4 g)

    elasticresistance

    inertiaforce

    damping dynamicforce

    a. Determination of horizontal forceat base:

    H = K V(influence of zone, ground, naturalfrequency, importance ...);

    b. Determination of H distribution.

    Model ofinverted pendulum"

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 43

    eccentric diagonals plastic hinges isolators

    laminatedrubber

    lead plug (damper)

    LRB (Lead Rubber Bearing)

    Seismic movement

    LRB

    Damping of structural vibrations

    Goals: - to reduce internal forces from vibrations (due to wind, earthquake),- to reduce accelerations (< 0,15 g).

    1. Natural damping (activated by own structure)- internal (due to deformations), plastic behaviour (eccentric diagonals),

    base isolators, structural shape).

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 44

    2. Dampers: - passive (frictional, piston, spring)- active (still in development)

    Passive dampers

    Active dampers

    visco-elastic plates

    pistondamperHIDAM

    springconnection

    sliding placedmass

    wind

    cables

    sensor

    cables effect

    jets withcompr. air

    sensor

    flaps

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 45

    Examples of dampers

    LED Lead Extrusion Damper(plastic deformation of lead)

    Steel tubewith a bulge connection

    seal

    sealtube

    lead

    TMP-RPTuned Mass Damper

    - Roller Pendulum(mass anti-movement)

    viscous fluiddamper

    additionalmass

    rolling pendulumdamper

    TMP-RP

    LED

    multilayer shearplanes

    loadingplate

    MS Stopper(viscous material among shear planes)

    material of highviscosity

  • 7 Prof. Ing. Josef Machek, DrSc.

    OK3 46

    Yielding brace system (YBS), Scorpion, Toronto, 2011(www.castconnex.com)

    The diagonal brace member is equipped with two cast connectors. Each connector resemblesa claw, with a heavy elastic arm welded to the diagonal end and protruding triangular shapedyielding fingers that are bolted to a splice plate connection at the beam-column joint. When under an earthquake, the fingers plastically deform and their curvature results in a tensile force in each finger that increase the strength and stiffness of the brace (unwanted soft storey isavoided).