7165 KEYSTONE STREET - Philadelphia · parking stalls. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 192'-0 9/16" p.l. [191.523' (ds)

CIVIC DESIGN REVIEWDate: 06.23.2020

7165KEYSTONE STREET

027165 KEYSTONE STREET CIVIC DESIGN REVIEWDate: 06.23.2020

ContentsSite Context ..................

3-Block Radius Map ................ 03Street Images ............... 04

Zoning Land Use Map ................ 05Civic Survey ................ 06Zoning Plan ................ 07

Site Plan ..................Ground Floor Plan ................ 08

Pedestrian Experience ..................Sidewalk Condition ......... 09-10

Building Plans ..................Floor Plans ............ 11-12

Landscape Plan ..................Grade and Green Roof ................ 13

Facade ..................Elevation ........... 14-16

Material ................. 17Site Section ................. 18

Render ........... 19-20Checklists ..................

Sustainability ................ 21Streets Handbook Checklist .......... 22-29

Princeton Ave

Tyson Ave

Disston St

Longshore Ave

Knorr St

Wellington St

Ditman St

Gillespie St

Bleigh Ave

Torresdale Ave Cottm

an Ave

Vandike St

Hegerman St

Edmund St

Tulip St

Keystone St

Friendship St

State Road

Minor Stre

et

037165 KEYSTONE STREET CONTEXT MAP10 Minute Walk Radius

1

1

Septa Public Transportation

2

2

3

4

5

6

7

7

Disston Park

Hamilton Disston Elementary School

The Site (7165 Keystone St)

Russo Playground

Keystone Academy Charter School

St. Hubert Catholic High School

Disston Recreation Center

Tacony Library

Tacony Train Station

Quaker City Yacht Club

SEPTA train Route

Commercial Corridor

I-95

Trolley Line Route

8

8

9

10

5

6

4

10

9

3

1 AERIAL VIEW AERIAL VIEW2

047165 KEYSTONE STREET SITE CONTEXTStreet Images

3 4STREET VIEW STREET VIEW

SITE

SITE

057165 KEYSTONE STREET SITE CONTEXTZoning / Land Use Map

CMX-1NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL MIX-USE-1CMX-2NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL MIX-USE-2CMX-3COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE

ICMXINDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL MIX-USEIRMXINDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL MIX-USERM-1RESIDENTIAL MIX-USE-1

RSA-5RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED-5SP-PO-AACTIVE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE

SITE

067165 KEYSTONE STREET SITE CONTEXTCivil Survey

TOTALAREA = 34,348 SF

70 EXISTING PARKING STALLS

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

192'-0 9/16" P.L. [191.523' (DS) @ S52°50'23"W]

33'-4 7/16" P.L.[33.286' (DS) @ S68°02'05"W

161'-

4 3/

16" P

.L. [

160.

949'

(DS)

@ N

32°1

1'35"

W]

224'-2" P.L.[223.606' (DS) @ N57°48'25"E]

172'-

0 11

/16"

P.L

. [17

1.62

5' (D

S) @

N32

°11'3

5"W

]

8'-0"24'-0" EASEMENT[23.940' (DS) @ N57°48'25"E]

16

4

DASHED LINES REPRESENTEXTENT OF FIRST FLOOR

DOT HATCH AND LIGHTHIDDEN LINE REPRESENTEXTENT OF INDUSTRIALSPACE AT FIRST FLOOR

DOT HATCH AND LIGHTHIDDEN LINE REPRESENT

EXTENT OF INDUSTRIALSPACE AT FIRST FLOOR

SIX STORY PORTION

FIVE STORY PORTION

FIVE STORY PORTION

SIX STORY PORTION

ONE STORY PORTION

STAIROVERRUN

10'-0"h. MAX.

ELEVATOROVERRUN

10'-0"h. MAX.7123 KEYSTONE ST.EXISTING ADJACENT

PROPERTY WITHTWO STORYSTRUCTURE

ZONED: I-2

4925 PRINCETON AVENUEEXISTING ADJACENT

PROPERTY

ZONED: I-CMX

"THE PHILADELPHIA AND TRENTON RAILROAD"

EXISTING ADJACENT RAILROAD EASEMENT

7165 KEYSTONESTREET, PARCEL B

PROPOSED SIX STORYSTRUCTURE

KEYSTONE STREET40' RIGHT OF WAY [10'-20'-10']

LEGALLY OPEN - ON CITY PLANSCITY NEIGHBORHOOD STREET

PARKING

8'-0"184'-2"

2'-0"

99'-9

1/2

"

14'-0 3/4"

33'-8" SIX STORY PORTION26'-4" FIVE STORY PORTION

165'-7 1/8"

141'-5 1/2"

143'-

11 3

/4"

2'-0"

42'-7

1/2

"10

'-0"

41'-0

"

7'-0"

145'-10"

33'-8

"

±15'-

0"±1

8'-8"

±8'-4" ±7'-10 1/8"

±8'-4"

53'-9"

48'-6"29

'-0"

112'-2"

26'-4

"

18'-0"

11

4

4

8'-6" TYPPARKING

STALL

18'-0" TYPPARKING STALL

8'-6" ADA STALL8'-0" MIN8'-6" AISLE

8'-0" MIN8'-6" ADA STALL8'-0" MIN 24'-0" DRIVE AISLE

18'-0" TYPPARKING STALL

8'-6" TYPPARKING

STALL

10'-0"REAR YARD

12'-0" 26'-4" 40'-0"

7165 KEYSTONE STREET,PARCEL A

PROPOSED, SUBDIVIDEDPARCEL

USE: 51-100 APTS(NO CHANGE PROPOSED)

101'-

0 13

/16"

EAS

EMEN

T [1

00.8

17' (D

S) @

S32

°11'3

5"E]

8'-0 1/4" EASEMENT

[7.999' (DS) @ N52°50'23"E

24'-1 1/16" EASEMENT

[24.030'@S3255d11'53"E]

32'-1 5/16" EASEMENT

[32.029' (DS) @ S52'50"23"W]

127'-

1 13

/16"

EAS

EMEN

T[1

26.8

32' (D

S) @

N32

°11'3

5"W

]

24'-0"18'-0" TYPPARKING STALL

8'-6"

TYP

PARK

ING

STAL

L

1Z.1

1Z.1

2Z.1

2Z.1

COMMON ROOF DECKOVER FIVE STORY

PORTION

5'-0"

DECK

SETB

ACK

3Z.1

24'-0" PROPOSED CURB CUT

24'-0" DRIVE AISLE

10'-0

" SID

EWAL

K

6'-0"

4'-0"FURNITURE ZONE

PEDESTRIAN ZONE

4,196 SF PARKING AREAOPEN TO SKY

3,278 SFGREEN AREA(420 SF MIN.

LANDSCAPED)

MIN. 2 TREES

15'-0" MIN.EQ. (±25'-1")

PROPOSED STREETTREES

[49] CLASS A BICYCLESTALLS ON AN

ACCESSIBLE ROUTE

MIN. 5'-0"BUFFER

MIN. 5'-0"BUFFER

EXISTING PARKINGAREA AT PARCEL A

TO REMAIN

3'-0" BALCONIES AT

3RD/5TH FLS.

±8'-0"

3'-0" BALCONY AT

3RD FL.

±8'-0"

3'-0" BALCONIES AT

2ND/5TH FLS.

±8'-0"

3'-0" BALCONY AT

4TH FL.

±8'-0"

3'-0" BALCONIES AT

3RD/5TH FLS.

±8'-0"

3'-0"

BALC

ONIE

S AT

3RD/

5TH

FLS.

±8'-0

"

3'-0"

BALC

ONY

AT2N

D FL

.

±8'-0

"

3'-0"

BALC

ONY

AT5T

H FL

.

±8'-0

"

3'-0"

BALC

ONIE

S AT

2ND/

4TH

FLS

.

±8'-0

"

±5'-0"TYP ±10'-0"

PRIVATE ROOF DECK

AT SECOND FL.

±11'-8 3/4"

PRIVATE ROOF DECK

AT SECOND FL.

±13'-0"

PRIVATE ROOF DECK

AT SECOND FL.

±10'-0"

PRIVATE ROOF DECK

AT SECOND FL.

±13'-0" ±13'-0" ±13'-0" ±9'-6 1/2"

±9'-0

"±9

'-0"

PRIVATE ROOF DECKAT SECOND FL.




PRIV

ATE

ROOF

DEC

KAT

SEC

OND

FL.

PRIV

ATE

ROOF

DEC

KAT

SEC

OND

FL.

COMMON ROOF DECKOVER FIVE STORY

PORTION

10'-0

DEC

KSE

TBAC

K

37'-0

"RO

OF D

ECK

32'-0"ROOF DECK

10'-0" DECKSETBACK

16'-4"ROOF DECK

16'-4

"RO

OF D

ECK

1'-0"

(TYP

)

1'-0"

1'-0"

(TYP

)

45'-9" ROOF DECK

15'-0" ROOF DECK

15'-0" MIN.16'-5"15'-0" MIN.15'-0" MIN.15'-0" MIN. EQ. (±27'-4 3/4") EQ. (±27'-4 3/4") EQ. (±25'-1")

EXT'G UTILITY POLE(TYP)

RECESS ATFIRST FLOOR

23'-4"

23'-0

"

10'-0"

XX

XX

6'-0"h. FENCE ATPROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED BIKE RACK(TYP.)

Z.0

ZONING SITE PLAN

HARMAN DEUTSCH OHLER ARCHITECTS HEREBYRESERVES IT'S COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND ALLPROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE DRAWINGS, IDEAS ANDDESIGNS. THE INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET IS NOTTO BE REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR COPIED IN ANYMANNER. THE INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET IS NOTTO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THEEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF HARMANDEUTSCH OHLER ARCHITECTS.

# DATE ISSUE / REVISION

© 2019 HARMAN DEUTSCH OHLER ARCHITECTURE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

DRAWINGS CHECKED BY:

DRAWING TITLE:

DRAWING NUMBER:

DRAWINGS PREPARED BY:

7165 KEYSTONE STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19135

PROJECT ADDRESS:

CONSULTANTS:

SEAL:

JW

ZONING SUBMISSION12/13/2019

GW

1

ZONING RFI01/08/20202ZONING (CDR)04/07/20203

ZON

ING

ON

LY

PLAN NORTH

077165 KEYSTONE STREET SITE CONTEXTZoning Plan

ZONING CHARTBASE DISTRICT: I-RMXABUTTING DISTRICT: I2-ICMXDISTRICT ACROSS STREET: ICMX + RSA-3LOT AREA: 35,529 SF (.81 AC)USE: 106 RESIDENTIAL UNITS

VACANT INDUSTRIAL SPACE

DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS:REQUIRED / ALLOWED PROPOSED

OPEN AREA: 9,132 SF (25%) 9,533 SF (26.1%)OCCUPIED AREA: 27,397 SF (75%) 27,088 SF (74.9%)FRONT YARD SETBACK: N/A 2’SIDE YARD: N/A 40’REAR YARD: N/A 10’HEIGHT: 72’ 67’

GFA: 389,408.5 (500%) 115,405 SF (315%)STREET TREES: 6 7

PARKING: REQUIRED PROPOSEDAUTO PARKING: 37 SP

(2) ADA(2) ELECTRIC

35 SP (2) ADA(2) ELECTRIC

BIKE PARKING: 39 STALLS 49 TYPE 1A STALLSLOADING SPACE: 0 0

RIGHT-OF-WAY COMPONENTS:KEYSTONE STREET

KEYSTONE STREET

PEDESTRIAN ZONE: 8’FURNISHING ZONE: 4’

BUILDING ZONE: 0’

ENCROACHMENTS (TYP.):STAIR : 0’EGRESS WELLS: 0’

087165 KEYSTONE STREET SITE PLANGround Floor Plan

KEYNOTESKEYNOTES

Interior Trash Storage

Existing Utility Pole

Existing Street Lamp

Proposed Bicycle Rack

Existing Curbcut

Proposed Street Tree w/ Enlarged Pits, 3’x6’

Stamped Concrete Sidewalk

Parking Stall, 8’-6” x 18’-0”

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

5

5

6

7

7 8

4

8

8

9

9

9

6

2

22

14

3

Existing Parking Stall to remain

9

3 3

Residential Elevator10

Accesible parking hall 8'x18' w/ 8'x18' access aisle

11

Line Of Bldg Above

Mailroom

Crosswalk

Class 1a Bike Storage

6' High Fence @ P.l.

12

13

14

15

15

16

pg 10

pg 09pg 09

12 10

10

11

13

3 3

1

3

11

12

12

12

14

16

Residential Program

Vacant Industrial

Mixed Use Building

GROUND FLOORGROUND FLOOR

SITE PLAN

11111

FRIENDSHIP ST.

PECO VAULT

PHILA-TRENTONRAILROAD EASEMENT

ELECROOM

WATERPUMP

PROPOSED EXISTING

097165 KEYSTONE STREET

1

1

2

2

A

BC

D

E

F

STAMPED CONCRETE

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

ENLARGED TREE PIT

PERMEABLE PAVERS

RECESSED DOORS

BIKE RACKS

B

C

E

C

B

SET-

BA

CK

WA

LKZO

NE

FUR

N

ZON

E

4’-0

”6’

-0”

2’-0

”

VACANT INDUSTRIAL

VACANT INDUSTRIALPECO VAULT7123

KEYSTONESTREET

BLDG UTILITY

SET-

BA

CK

WA

LKZO

NE

FUR

N

ZON

E

4’-0

”6’

-0”

2’-0

”

EXITRES-

VA

CA

NT

IND

UST

RIA

L

VA

CA

NT

IND

UST

RIA

L

KE

YSTO

NE

STR

EE

T

20’-0

”

B

B

KEYSTONE STCITY NEIGHBORHOOD STREET

40’ (10’-20’-10’)


40’ (10’-20’-10’)

FRIENDSHIP STREET

F FF

G EXISTING UTLITY POLE

GG

Pedestrian ExperienceAmerican St


3

3

B

A

B C

A

C A

GYMENTRY 8'-0" 24'-0" 8'-0"

RESIDENTIAL SIDEWALK DRIVE AISLE PLANTERSE

T-B

AC

KW

ALK

ZON

EFU

RN

ZO

NE

4’-0

”6’

-0”

23’-0

”2’

-0”

RE

SID

EN

TIA

L R

EC

ESS

7165

KE

YSTO

NE

ST


40’ (10’-20’-10’)

A

BC

D

E

F

G

G

STAMPED CONCRETE

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

ENLARGED TREE PIT

PERMEABLE PAVERS

RECESSED DOORS

BIKE RACKS

COLUMN

EXISTING CURBCUT

24' -0" NO CHANGE

Pedestrian ExperienceAmerican St

117165 KEYSTONE STREET FLOOR PLANS.

2ND FLOOR 3RD - 5TH FLOOR

Common Space

Studio

1 Bedroom

2 Bedroom

ProgramProgram

FLOOR PLAN

ROOFDECK (TYP.)

GREEN ROOF

BALCONY(TYP.)

127165 KEYSTONE STREET FLOOR PLANS.

6TH FLOOR ROOF PLAN

Common Space

Studio

1 Bedroom

2 Bedroom

ProgramProgram

FLOOR PLAN

COMMONROOF DECK

ELE

VA

TOR

OV

ER

-RU

N

RO

OF

AC

CE

SSST

RU

CTU

RE

COMMON

ROOF DECK

GREEN ROOF

GREEN ROOF

CONDENSORS (TYP.)

137165 KEYSTONE STREET LANDSCAPINGSITE AND GREEN ROOF

1

2


INDUSTRIAL SPACERESIDENTIALENTRY

RESIDENTIAL ENTRY

DRIVEAISLE

KEYSTONESTREET

DRIVEAISLE

PARKINGSTALLS

10' REARYARD

PARKINGSTALLS

WALK WAY

WALK WAY

PLANTER

WALK WAY

1 | KEYSTONE STREET

2 | DRIVE AISLE

7123 KEYSTONE ST

7165

K

EYS

TON

E S

T

7124

K

EYS

TON

E S

T

FACADE Elevations

2

1


2 | REAR ELEVATION

7123

K

EYS

TON

E S

T

| COURTYARD | SOUTH

7124

K

EYS

TON

E S

T

INDUSTRIAL SPACEKEYSTONESTREET

PARKINGSTALLS

10' REARYARD

WALK WAY

WALK WAY

7165

K

EYS

TON

E S

T

PARKING STALLS DRIVEAISLE

PLANTERWALK WAY

SIDEYARD

FACADE Elevations

1

2


1 | COURTYARD | NORTH

2 | COURTYARD | SOUTH

FACADE Elevations

177165 KEYSTONE STREET MATERIALElevation Facade

CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WHITE

2

2

2

METAL PANELWHITE

BRICKGREY

WINDOWSTO MATCH MATERIAL SURROUND

1

1

1

3

3

3

4

4

5

5

5

MATERIAL PALETTESMATERIAL PALETTES

ELEVATION

FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

METAL PANELBLACK

STOREFRONTTO MATCH MATERIAL SURROUND

6

8

LIGHTINGMODERN

7

RAILINGBLACK

6 7

8

8

187165 KEYSTONE STREET SITE SECTION-

B

B

A

A

197165 KEYSTONE STREET RENDER VIEW 1

207165 KEYSTONE STREET RENDER VIEW 1

217165 KEYSTONE STREET Sustainability-

Civic Sustainable Design Checklist – Updated September 3, 2019

1

Civic Design Review Sustainable Design Checklist Sustainable design represents important city-wide concerns about environmental conserva on and energy use. Development teams should try to integrate elements that meet many goals, including:

· Reuse of ex ng building stock · Incorpora on of ex ng on-site natural habitats and landscape elements · Inclusion of high-performing stormwater control · Site and building massing to maximize daylight and reduce shading on adjacent sites · Redu on of energy use and the produc on of greenhouse gases · Promo on of reasonable access to transporta on altern ves

The Sustainable Design Checklist asks for responses to speci c benchmarks. These metrics go above and beyond the minimum requirements in the Zoning and Building codes. All benchmarks are based on adap ons from Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) v4 unless otherwise noted.

Categories

Benchmark

Does project meet benchmark? If yes, please explain how. If no, please explain why not.

Loca on and Transporta on

(1) Access to Quality Transit

Locate a fun onal entry of the project within a ¼-mile (400-meter) walking distance of exis ng or planned bus, streetcar, or rideshare stops, bus rapid transit stops, light or heavy rail sta ons.

(2) Reduced Parking Footprint

All new parking areas will be in the rear yard of the property or under the building, and unenclosed or uncovered parking areas are 40% or less of the site area.

(3) Green Vehicles

Designate 5% of all parking spaces used by the project as preferred parking for green vehicles or car share vehicles. Clearly iden and enforce for sole use by car share or green vehicles, which include plug-in electric vehicles and alterna ve fuel vehicles.

(4) Railway Setbacks (Excluding frontages facing trolleys/light rail or enclosed subsurface rail lines or subways)

To foster safety and maintain a quality of life protected from excessive noise and vibra on, residen al development with railway frontages should be setback from rail lines and the building’s exterior envelope, including windows, should reduce exterior sound transmission to 60dBA. (If setback used, specify distance)i

(5) Bike Share Sta Incorporate a bike share sta on in coordina n with and conformance to the standards of Philadelphia Bike Share.

Yes.

- Bus 70+84 @ Princeton Ave & Tulip St

- Tacony Station @ keystone& Disston St

No, no bike share stations are Proposed

2/35 = 5.7%

We are setback 10’ from the P.L.abutting the railroad property. Triplepanel windows will be used on therear facade as well as additionalSTL rating on the rear wall referto attached detail

35 proposed parking 89% covered 11% uncovered


2

Water E ciency

(6) Outdoor Water Use

Maintain on-site vegeta on without on. OR, Reduce of watering

requirements at least 50% from the calculated baseline for the site's peak watering month.

Sustainable Sites

(7) Pervious Site Surfaces

Provides vegetated and/or pervious open space that is 30% or greater of the site's Open Area, as de ned by the zoning code. Vegetated and/or green roofs can be included in this calcula n.

(8) Rainwater Management

Conform to the stormwater requirements of the Philadelphia Water Department(PWD) and either: A) Develop a green street and donate it to PWD, designed and constructed in accordance with the PWD Green Streets Design Manual, OR B) Manage add onal runo from adjacent streets on the development site, designed and constructed in accordance with speci ons of the PWD Stormwater Management Regula ns

(9) Heat Island Redu on (excluding roofs)

Reduce the heat island e ect through either of the following strategies for 50% or more of all on-site hardscapes: A) Hardscapes that have a high re ectance, an SRI>29. B) Shading by trees, structures, or solar panels.

Energy and Atmosphere

(10) Energy Commissioning and Energy Performance - Adherence to the New Building Code

PCPC notes that as of April 1, 2019 new energy conserva n standards are required in the Philadelphia Building Code, based on recent updates of the Interna nal Energy Conserva on Code (IECC) and the op on to use ASHRAE 90.01-2016. PCPC sta asks the applicant to state which path they are taking for compliance, including their choice of code and any op ons being pursued under the 2018 IECC.ii

(11) Energy Commissioning and Energy Performance - Going beyond the code

Will the project pursue energy performance measures beyond what is required in the Philadelphia code by mee ng any of these benchmarks? iii

Reduce energy consump on by achieving 10% energy savings or more from an established baseline using

The lanscaping will take 3 years to establish, during which time it will need irrigation. After this period the on-site vegetation will be managed without irrigation.

2018 IECC (RE) +PRESCRIPTIVE

Yes, all stormwater on the roof will be managed via the green roofs@ the 2nd floor and 6th floor

Yes,17,878 SF (Green/Pervious Area)36,529 SF (Open Area)= 48% Green/Pervious Area

All hardscapes will have a high reflectance of SRI>29. The remaining 26.1% of open area is hardscaped w/ light grey concrete pavers or vegetated areas.

No Additional Measurements


3

ASHRAE standard 90.1-2016 (LEED v4.1 metric). Achieve ce ca n in Energy Star for Mu family New Constru on (MFNC).

Achieve Passive House Ce on

(12) Indoor Air Quality and Transporta on

Any sites within 1000 feet of an interstate highway, state highway, or freeway will provide air lters for all regularly occupied spaces that have a Minimum E iency Repo ng Value (MERV) of 13. Filters shall be installed prior to occupancy.iv

(13) On-Site Renewable Energy Produce renewable energy on-site that will provide at least 3% of the project's an pated energy usage.

Innova on

(14) Innova Any other sustainable measures that could pos vely impact the public realm.

i Railway Associa on of Canada (RAC)'s “Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway Opera ons. Exterior Sound transmission standard from LEED v4, BD+C, Acou c Performance Credit. ii Title 4 The Philadelphia Building Construc on and Occupancy Code See also, “The Commercial Energy Code Compliance” informa on sheet: h ps://www.phila.gov/li/Documents/Commercial%20Energy%20Code%20Compliance%20Fact%20Sheet--Final.pdf and the “What Code Do I Use” informa on sheet: h ps://www.phila.gov/li/Documents/What%20Code%20Do%20I%20Use.pdf iii LEED 4.1, Op mize Energy Performance in LEED v4.1 For Energy Star: www.Energystar.gov For Passive House, see www.phius.org iv Sec on 99.04.504.6 "Filters" of the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code, from a 2016 Los Angeles Ordinance requiring enhan lters in homes near freeways

Yes to energy star appliances +light fixturesNot Energy Star Cert.Not Passive House

No, renewable energy will not be produced on-site.

Bike racks have been provided on keystone street to promote this form of transportation.

Yes, compliant filters will be installed

227165 KEYSTONE STREET STC DETAIL

TYP. IIIB WALL CONSTRUCTION:-EXTERIOR CLADDING (MASONRY VENEER ORMETAL CLADDING)-CONTINUOUS AIR/WATER BARRIER-1/2" FRT PLYWOOD SHEATHING-2x6 FRT WOOD STUD WALL-R-21 FG BATT INSULATION-[2] LAYERS 5/8" TYPE 'X' GWB

DOUBLE-PANE OPERABLE WINDOW

TYP. IIIB FLOOR CONSTRUCTION:-FINISH FLOOR AS PER PLANS1" GYPCRETE TOPPER OVER ACOUSTIC MAT-3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING-TJI FRAMING-SOUND BATTS-RESILIENT CHANNEL-[2] LAYERS 5/8" TYPE 'X' GWB

WALL CONSTRUCTION W/ SOUND ATTENUATION:-EXTERIOR CLADDING (MASONRY VENEER ORMETAL CLADDING)-CONTINUOUS AIR/WATER BARRIER-1/2" FRT PLYWOOD SHEATHING-2x6 FRT WOOD STUD WALL-R-21 FG BATT INSULATION-[2] LAYERS 5/8" TYPE 'X' GWB-ADDITIONAL LAYER 1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING-RESILIENT CHANNEL-ADDITIONAL LAYER 5/8" GWB.

TRIPLE-PANE OPERABLE WINDOW

TYP. IIIB FLOOR CONSTRUCTION:-FINISH FLOOR AS PER PLANS1" GYPCRETE TOPPER OVER ACOUSTIC MAT-3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING-TJI FRAMING-SOUND BATTS-RESILIENT CHANNEL-[2] LAYERS 5/8" TYPE 'X' GWB

SKETCH

SK22315-25 N. FRONT STREETPhiladelphia, PA

2315

-25

N. F

RO

NT

ST.

Phila

delp

hia,

PA

© 2019 HARMAN DEUTSCH OHLER ARCHITECTURE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

# DATE ISSUE / REVISION

DEED INPUT / FEASIBILITYXX.XX.XX

DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY:

XX XX1

2 REVISED SCHEM. PLANS

SD APPROVAL PACKAGE

05/30/2019 GW JW

3 REVISED SCHEM. PLANS06/10/2019 GW JW

GW/JW JW4 07/09/2019

SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS EQ JW5 07/25/2019

TYP. WALL CONSTRUCTION WALL CONSTRUCTION WITHSOUND ATTENUATION

237165 KEYSTONE STREET COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST-

COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission

1

INSTRUCTIONS This Checklist is an implementation tool of the Philadelphia Complete Streets Handbook (the “Handbook”) and enables City engineers and planners to review projects for their compliance with the Handbook’s policies. The handbook provides design guidance and does not supersede or replace language, standards or policies established in the City Code, City Plan, or Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

The Philadelphia City Planning Commission receives this Checklist as a function of its Civic Design Review (CDR) process. This checklist is used to document how project applicants considered and accommodated the needs of all users of city streets and sidewalks during the planning and/or design of projects affecting public rights‐of‐way. Departmental reviewers will use this checklist to confirm that submitted designs incorporate complete streets considerations (see §11‐901 of The Philadelphia Code). Applicants for projects that require Civic Design Review shall complete this checklist and attach it to plans submitted to the Philadelphia City Planning Commission for review, along with an electronic version.

The Handbook and the checklist can be accessed at http://www.phila.gov/CityPlanning/projectreviews/Pages/CivicDesignReview.aspx

PRELIMINARY PCPC REVIEW AND COMMENT:

DATE

FINAL STREETS DEPT REVIEW AND COMMENT:

DATE


2

INSTRUCTIONS (continued) APPLICANTS SHOULD MAKE SURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:

� This checklist is designed to be filled out electronically in Microsoft Word format. Please submit the Word version of the checklist. Text fields will expand automatically as you type.

� All plans submitted for review must clearly dimension the widths of the Furnishing, Walking, and Building Zones (as defined in Section 1 of the Handbook). “High Priority” Complete Streets treatments (identified in Table 1 and subsequent sections of the Handbook) should be identified and dimensioned on plans.

� All plans submitted for review must clearly identify and site all street furniture, including but not limited to bus shelters, street signs and hydrants.

� Any project that calls for the development and installation of medians, bio‐swales and other such features in the right‐of‐way may require a maintenance agreement with the Streets Department.

� ADA curb‐ramp designs must be submitted to Streets Department for review

� Any project that significantly changes the curb line may require a City Plan Action. The City Plan Action Application is available at http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/survey‐and‐design‐bureau/city‐plans‐unit . An application to the Streets Department for a City Plan Action is required when a project plan proposes the:

o Placing of a new street; o Removal of an existing street; o Changes to roadway grades, curb lines, or widths; or o Placing or striking a city utility right‐of‐way.

Complete Streets Review Submission Requirement*: EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale

o FULLY DIMENSIONED o CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES o TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS

PROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale o FULLY DIMENSIONED, INCLUDING DELINEATION OF WALKING, FURNISHING, AND BUILDING ZONES AND

PINCH POINTS o PROPOSED CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES o PROPOSED TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS

*APPLICANTS PLEASE NOTE: ONLY FULL‐SIZE, READABLE SITE PLANS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ADDITIONAL PLANS MAY BE REQUIRED AND WILL BE REQUESTED IF NECESSARY



3

GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1. PROJECT NAME

7165 Keystone Street 2. DATE

03.17.2020 3. APPLICANT NAME

Rustin Ohler [HarmanDeutschOhler Architecture] 4. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION

1225 N. 7th Street, 267‐324‐3601

5. PROJECT AREA: list precise street limits and scope 36,529 SF

6. OWNER NAME 7165 Keystone Investments

7. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION 20 Washington St. Ste 403 Cresskill NJ 07626 1‐551‐244‐0658

8. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT NAME Rustin Ohler [HarmanDeutschOhler Architecture]

9. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT CONTACT INFORMATION 1225 N. 7th Street, 267‐324‐3601

10. STREETS: List the streets associated with the project. Complete Streets Types can be found at www.phila.gov/map under the “Complete Street Types” field. Complete Streets Types are also identified in Section 3 of the Handbook. Also available here: http://metadata.phila.gov/#home/datasetdetails/5543867320583086178c4f34/

STREET FROM TO COMPLETE STREET TYPE Keystone St. Friendship St. Wellington St. City Neighborhood Street

11. Does the Existing Conditions site survey clearly identify the following existing conditions with dimensions? a. Parking and loading regulations in curb lanes adjacent to the site YES NO b. Street Furniture such as bus shelters, honor boxes, etc. YES NO N/A c. Street Direction YES NO d. Curb Cuts YES NO N/A e. Utilities, including tree grates, vault covers, manholes, junction

boxes, signs, lights, poles, etc. YES NO N/A

f. Building Extensions into the sidewalk, such as stairs and stoops YES NO N/A APPLICANT: General Project Information Additional Explanation / Comments:


4

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: General Project Information

COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST-



5

PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.3) 12. SIDEWALK: list Sidewalk widths for each street frontage. Required Sidewalk widths are listed in Section 4.3 of the

Handbook. STREET FRONTAGE TYPICAL SIDEWALK WIDTH

(BUILDING LINE TO CURB) Required / Existing / Proposed

CITY PLAN SIDEWALK WIDTH Existing / Proposed

Keystone St. 10’ / 10’ / 12’ 10’ / 12’ / / / / / / / / /

13. WALKING ZONE: list Walking Zone widths for each street frontage. The Walking Zone is defined in Section 4.3 of the Handbook, including required widths.

STREET FRONTAGE WALKING ZONE Required / Existing / Proposed

Keystone St. 6’ / 6’ / 8’ / / / / / /

14. VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS: list Vehicular Intrusions into the sidewalk. Examples include but are not limited to; driveways, lay‐by lanes, etc. Driveways and lay‐by lanes are addressed in sections 4.8.1 and 4.6.3, respectively, of the Handbook. EXISTING VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS

INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT

PROPOSED VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT Curbcut 24’ Keystone St.


6

PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (continued) DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

15. When considering the overall design, does it create or enhance a pedestrian environment that provides safe and comfortable access for all pedestrians at all times of the day?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Pedestrian Component Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Pedestrian Component Reviewer Comments:




7

BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.4) 16. BUILDING ZONE: list the MAXIMUM, existing and proposed Building Zone width on each street frontage. The Building

Zone is defined as the area of the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the building face, wall, or fence marking the property line, or a lawn in lower density residential neighborhoods. The Building Zone is further defined in section 4.4.1 of the Handbook.

STREET FRONTAGE MAXIMUM BUILDING ZONE WIDTH Existing / Proposed

Keystone St. 0’ / 0’ / / /

17. FURNISHING ZONE: list the MINIMUM, recommended, existing, and proposed Furnishing Zone widths on each street frontage. The Furnishing Zone is further defined in section 4.4.2 of the Handbook.

STREET FRONTAGE MINIMUM FURNISHING ZONE WIDTH Recommended / Existing / Proposed

Keystone St. 4’ / 4’/ 4’ / / / / / /

18. Identify proposed “high priority” building and furnishing zone design treatments that are incorporated into the design plan, where width permits (see Handbook Table 1). Are the following treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

Bicycle Parking YES NO N/A YES NO Lighting YES NO N/A YES NO Benches YES NO N/A YES NO Street Trees YES NO N/A YES NO Street Furniture YES NO N/A YES NO

19. Does the design avoid tripping hazards? YES NO N/A YES NO

20. Does the design avoid pinch points? Pinch points are locations where the Walking Zone width is less than the required width identified in item 13, or requires an exception

YES NO N/A YES NO


8

BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (continued)

APPLICANT: Building & Furnishing Component Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Building & Furnishing Component Reviewer Comments:

21. Do street trees and/or plants comply with street installation requirements (see sections 4.4.7 & 4.4.8)

YES NO N/A YES NO

22. Does the design maintain adequate visibility for all roadway users at intersections?

YES NO N/A YES NO




9

BICYCLE COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.5) 23. List elements of the project that incorporate recommendations of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, located online at

http://phila2035.org/wp‐content/uploads/2012/06/bikePedfinal2.pdf

24. List the existing and proposed number of bicycle parking spaces, on‐ and off‐street. Bicycle parking requirements are provided in The Philadelphia Code, Section 14‐804.

BUILDING / ADDRESS REQUIRED SPACES

ON‐STREET Existing / Proposed

ON SIDEWALK Existing / Proposed

OFF‐STREET Existing / Proposed

Keystone St. 39 0 / 0 0 / 10 0 / 49 / / / / / / / / /

25. Identify proposed “high priority” bicycle design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that are

incorporated into the design plan, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” elements identified and dimensioned on the plan?

DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

Conventional Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO Buffered Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO Bicycle‐Friendly Street Indego Bicycle Share Station

YES NO N/A YES NO N/A

YES NO YES NO

26. Does the design provide bicycle connections to local bicycle, trail, and transit networks?

YES NO N/A YES NO

27. Does the design provide convenient bicycle connections to residences, work places, and other destinations?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Bicycle Component Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Bicycle Component Reviewer Comments:


10

CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.6) DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

28. Does the design limit conflict among transportation modes along the curb?

YES NO YES NO

29. Does the design connect transit stops to the surrounding pedestrian network and destinations?

YES NO N/A YES NO

30. Does the design provide a buffer between the roadway and pedestrian traffic?

YES NO N/A YES NO

31. How does the proposed plan affect the accessibility, visibility, connectivity, and/or attractiveness of public transit? N/A

YES NO

APPLICANT: Curbside Management Component Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Curbside Management Component Reviewer Comments:




11

VEHICLE / CARTWAY COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.7) 32. If lane changes are proposed, , identify existing and proposed lane widths and the design speed for each street

frontage; STREET FROM TO LANE WIDTHS

Existing / Proposed DESIGN SPEED

/ / / /

DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

33. What is the maximum AASHTO design vehicle being accommodated by the design?

P YES NO

34. Will the project affect a historically certified street? An inventory of historic streets(1) is maintained by the Philadelphia Historical Commission.

YES NO YES NO

35. Will the public right‐of‐way be used for loading and unloading activities?

YES NO YES NO

36. Does the design maintain emergency vehicle access? YES NO YES NO

37. Where new streets are being developed, does the design connect and extend the street grid?

YES NO N/A YES NO

38. Does the design support multiple alternative routes to and from destinations as well as within the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

39. Overall, does the design balance vehicle mobility with the mobility and access of all other roadway users?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Vehicle / Cartway Component Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Vehicle / Cartway Component Reviewer Comments:

(1) http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/images/uploads/documents/Historical_Street_Paving.pdf


12

URBAN DESIGN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.8) DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

40. Does the design incorporate windows, storefronts, and other active uses facing the street?

YES NO N/A YES NO

41. Does the design provide driveway access that safely manages pedestrian / bicycle conflicts with vehicles (see Section 4.8.1)?

YES NO N/A YES NO

42. Does the design provide direct, safe, and accessible connections between transit stops/stations and building access points and destinations within the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Urban Design Component Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Urban Design Component Reviewer Comments:




13

INTERSECTIONS & CROSSINGS COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.9) 43. If signal cycle changes are proposed, please identify Existing and Proposed Signal Cycle lengths; if not, go to question

No. 48. SIGNAL LOCATION EXISTING

CYCLE LENGTH PROPOSED CYCLE LENGTH

DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

44. Does the design minimize the signal cycle length to reduce pedestrian wait time?

YES NO N/A YES NO

45. Does the design provide adequate clearance time for pedestrians to cross streets?

YES NO N/A YES NO

46. Does the design minimize pedestrian crossing distances by narrowing streets or travel lanes, extending curbs, reducing curb radii, or using medians or refuge islands to break up long crossings? If yes, City Plan Action may be required.

YES NO N/A YES NO

47. Identify “High Priority” intersection and crossing design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that will be incorporated into the design, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” design treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

YES NO

Marked Crosswalks YES NO N/A YES NO Pedestrian Refuge Islands YES NO N/A YES NO Signal Timing and Operation YES NO N/A YES NO Bike Boxes YES NO N/A YES NO

48. Does the design reduce vehicle speeds and increase visibility for all modes at intersections?

YES NO N/A YES NO

49. Overall, do intersection designs limit conflicts between all modes and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Intersections & Crossings Component Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Intersections & Crossings Component Reviewer Comments:


14

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS APPLICANT Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW Additional Reviewer Comments:
