Upload
others
View
12
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg)Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
A comparative study of the vocabulary in primaryschool Chinese textbooks in the perspective ofdistribution, usage & level of difficulty
Quek, Germaine Jiamin
2019
Quek, G. J. (2019). A comparative study of the vocabulary in primary school Chinesetextbooks in the perspective of distribution, usage & level of difficulty. Student ResearchPoster, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/151816
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/151816
© 2019 The Author(s).
Downloaded on 26 Jan 2022 15:23:41 SGT
Conclusion
Findings & Discussion
Suggestions
• Current or future syllabuses could consider setting up a vocabulary list which includes the set of vocabulary
that should be learnt at the Primary School Level.
• Additionally, a vocabulary list like that of HSK could be created, that is specific to Singapore. The list should
include words most commonly used in Singapore and be categorised into different levels. This could provide a
basis for future curriculum planning.
• The idea of establishing a textbook corpus for teachers’ use should be considered as it can help teachers find
high and low frequency words and allow teachers to make necessary adjustments to aid in improving
efficiency of vocabulary teaching.
• Jiang Xin (1998) noted that when vocabularies are being categorised into themes and taught in this way,
vocabularies would have higher frequency. Hence, future syllabuses could consider designing the texts in a
way whereby each unit follows a certain topic, and intentionally plan for the themes to recur in later parts.
Especially vocabularies that are applicable to daily life.
A Comparative Study of the Vocabulary in Primary School Chinese Textbooks--- In the perspective of distribution, usage & level of difficulty
Background
• Since its independence, Singapore has had 4 complete sets of nation-wide Chinese Language syllabuses.
• Teaching and learning materials represent a significant amount of the language learners come across
(Davidson, Indefrey & Gullberg, 2008; Milton, 2009).
• Vocabulary acquisition is of great significance in L2 learning, vocabulary ability has a strong correlation
with language skills - listening, speaking, reading and writing. (Gui, 2013)
There were various previous researches on analysing Chinese textbooks, however few did comparative study
on the different syllabuses. Dr Luo Qingming, in 2008, published a comparative study on three sets of
Chinese textbooks, focusing on the evolution, characteristics and shortcomings of the textbooks. Concrete
suggestions were also put forward for future planning of syllabuses. This comparative study, that is both
diachronic and synchronic, of all 4 sets of textbooks would be a first.
Methodology
Research Framework
Research Steps
Schmitt (2010) stated that corpus analysis has been one of the most important achievements in vocabulary
studies which allows researchers to understand how authentic language works. (as cited in Martini, 2012,
p.11)
Literature Review
Vocabulary Frequency
• It was found in a study done by Zhang Wei (2007) that the frequency of vocabulary has significant
impact on vocabulary acquisition; about 80% of high frequency vocabulary, 50% of medium-
frequency vocabulary and 1/3 of low-frequency vocabulary can be learned.
• Saragi, Nantion & Meister (1978) showed that the minimum vocabulary recurrence rate must be at
least six, 93% of the subjects successfully learn words that appear six or more times.
• Kachroo (1962) reports that Indian learners of English were able to learn most of the words that
occurred seven or more times in their textbooks but fewer of the many that occurred once or twice.
Total Vocabulary
• Li Wei (2016) mentioned that 8000-10000 vocabulary is more beneficial to learners in teaching
Chinese as a foreign language.
• Cai Li (2002) believes that the total number of vocabulary in textbooks should be set at a reasonable
standard of 2000-3000.
• Zhang Hesheng (2005) believes that middle to high level international students should be able to
acquire a vocabulary of about 5000.
Level of Difficulty
• HSK vocabulary list (1992) contains 8822 words divided into four levels: A, B, C, and D. There are
1033 words under level A, 2018 words under level B, 2202 words under level C, and 3569 funder
level D.
• According to HSK, leaners who received 400-2000 hours of Chinese language education and able to
master 2000-5000 words from levels A, B and C are eligible for HSK junior and intermediate
exams.
• Learners who received more than 3,000 hours of Chinese language education and able to master
5000-8000 words in levels A, B, C and D are eligible for HSK advanced examinations.
Building of
Corpus (1979,
1992, 2002,
2007 Higher
Chinese
Textbooks)
Text segmentation -
vocabulary
Part of speech Tagging
(Through automated
system & manual proofing)
Generating statistical data:
1. Total vocabulary in each textbook
2. Frequency of vocabulary
3. Usage of Vocabulary
4. Level of difficulty in accordance
to HSK
5. Common v.s unique vocabulary
Comparison of generated
statistics:
1. Internal (within levels)
2. External (with HSK
vocabulary list)
Findings &
discussion
Comparative
analysis of the
four textbooks
Conclusion
&
Suggestions
6524
7143
6063
6522
5400
5600
5800
6000
6200
6400
6600
6800
7000
7200
7400
79年 92年 02年 07年
VOCABULARY OF TEXTBOOK
Frequency 1979 (%) 1992 (%) 2002(%) 2007(%)
0 43.76 45.02 46.33 43.96
1—2 26.15 25.52 25.99 25.34
3—5 12.12 12.39 11.30 12.37
≥6 17.96 17.07 16.38 18.32
<0.5 0.5-0.9 1-2.9 3-5.9 ≥6
79年 52.3 13.3 16.6 6.2 11.7
92年 53.9 13.1 16.1 5.9 11.0
02年 55.3 13.0 15.9 5.9 10.0
07年 52.1 13.4 16.2 6.3 12.1
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
VOCABULARY USAGE
79年 92年 02年 07年
LEVEL 1979 1992 2002 2007
A 867 (83.9%) 863 (83.5%) 846(81.9%) 873(84.5%)
B 1215(60.2%)1250(61.9%)1098(54.4%)1230(61.0%)
C 851 (38.6%) 867(39.4%) 711(32.3%) 766(34.8%)
D 701(19.6%) 756(21.2%) 593(16.6%) 766(21.5%)
OUT
OF
HSK
2478 2980 2534 2657
• The problem of low recurrence rate for a large
number of vocabulary remained unchanged in all 4
textbooks. This would mean that students would have
a difficult time completely acquiring these vocabulary.
• According to the number of hours dedicated to
Chinese Language education, it is estimated for the
reasonable range of vocabulary to be about 5000.
• Adjustments to the total number of vocabulary in
each set of textbook could be made in moderation,
to a range of about 5000 words.
• The ratio of the parts of speech in textbooks
follows a trend, and is unaffected by size of text.
• Nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs, the four
major parts of speech in Chinese vocabulary,
account for about 88-89% of all the texts in each
syllabus.
• The difficulty level is reasonable across all 4 textbooks,
they are quite close to meeting the requirement of HSK.
• 2007 syllabus distribution of the vocabulary in the 5
levels is most reasonable.
• However, the number of vocabulary in level D with a
recurrence rate of 0 is too high.
• The usage of vocabulary in the four sets of textbooks
that meet the standard of 3-5 are minimal, accounting
for less than 20% of the total number of words. This
indicates that more than 80% of the vocabulary are not
well distributed.
Total
vocabulary
Coverage Frequency Usage Level of
difficulty
1979 3 2 2 2 3
1992 4 3 3 3 2
2002 1 1 4 4 4
2007 2 4 1 1 1
• The problems found from the data
derived from the vocabulary of the 4
sets of textbooks are similar and
follow a certain pattern.
• Adjustments can be made to all 4
sets.
• However, through evaluation of the
various research components, the
overall performance of 2007 syllabus
is most reasonable.
1979
1992
2002
2007
Corpus
HSK
Vocabulary
List
Level of
difficulty
• Total Vocabulary
• Coverage
• Part of
speech
distribution
• Frequency
• Usage
79年 92年 02年 07年Coverage 162 161 180 130
% 2.48 2.25 2.97 1.99
• Commonly used vocabulary are too concentrated, students
will be able to understand 50% of the textbook once they
have acquired these words.
Part of speech 1979 1992 2002 2007
Adjective (a) 10.32 10.81 9.70 10.30
Adjective
morpheme (ag) 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Distinguishing
word (b) 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.00
Conjunction (c) 1.03 0.85 1.02 0.98
Adverb (d) 5.56 5.00 5.49 4.75
Interjection (e) 0.17 0.13 0.07 0.17
Prefix (h) 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00
Proverbs (i) 3.62 4.76 3.35 3.54
Abbreviation (j) 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
Suffix (k) 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.12
Idioms (l) 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.00
Numerals (m) 0.66 0.59 0.61 1.35
Nouns (n) 45.03 45.04 42.42 45.03
Onomatopoeia (o) 0.46 0.50 0.18 0.49
Preposition (p) 0.77 0.74 0.84 0.75
Quantifier (q) 2.22 1.78 2.14 2.01
Pronoun (r) 1.06 1.04 1.39 1.26
Auxiliary (u) 0.57 0.46 0.51 0.38
Verb (v) 28.40 28.11 31.14 28.86
Non-morpheme (x) 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.00
Modal (y) 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
State word (z) 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00
Category: EDUCATION AND TEACHING - ARTS AND LANGUAGES Student: Germaine Quek JiaminNational Institute of Education Project ID: NIE18103Supervisor: Dr Luo Qingming