1
For more information, please visit: http://seari.mit.edu A Method for System of Systems Tradespace Exploration Debarati Chattopadhyay, S.M. in Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009 Advisors: Dr. Donna Rhodes, Dr. Adam Ross Biography Debarati Chattopadhyay received a S.M. degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from MIT. Debarati has B.S. degrees in Computer Engineering (2005) and Astrophysics(2004) from Lehigh University. She has worked in mission operations for the Chandra X-ray Observatory at the Harvard- Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. © 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Related Publications Chattopadhyay, D., Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H., “A Framework for Tradespace Exploration of Systems of Systems”, 6th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Los Angeles, CA, April 2008. Chattopadhyay, D., Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H., “Demonstration of System of Systems Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration on a Multi-Concept Surveillance Architecture”, 7th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Loughborough, UK, April 2009. Chattopadhyay, D., Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H., “Combining Attributes for Systems of Systems in Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration”, 7th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Loughborough, UK, April 2009. Chattopadhyay, D., Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H.,” A Practical Methodology for System of Systems Tradespace Exploration”, AIAA Space 2009 Conference and Exposition, Pasadena, CA. References Maier, M.W., "Architecting Principles for Systems-of-Systems", Systems Engineering, 1, 4, pp. 267-84, 1998. Director, Systems and Software Engineering, “Systems Engineering Guide for Systems of Systems”, Technical Report, Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics), Washington, D.C., 2008. Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H., "Architecting Systems for Value Robustness: Research Motivations and Progress," Annual IEEE Systems Conference, Montreal, Canada, April 2008. System of Systems Tradespace Exploration Method (SoSTEM) 1. What are the characteristics that distinguish SoS design from traditional system design? 2. What is a practical framework for SoS tradespace exploration? 3. How can the developed tradespace exploration framework be used to select SoS designs that are value robust through the SoS lifetime? SoS Specific Considerations Research Questions SoS is defined as a set or arrangement of systems that results when independent and useful systems are integrated into a larger systems that delivers unique capabilities. (DoD 2008) Contributions • Prescriptive, quantitative method for SoS tradespace exploration, called System of Systems Tradespace Exploration Method (SoSTEM), which enables the comparison of a large number of diverse SoS designs on the same tradespace and the selection of value robust SoS designs • Development of a framework for considering Managerial Control and Influence within SoSTEM during SoS conceptual design • System of Systems design requires sophisticated decision making under high uncertainty to ensure selection of designs that maintain value over the operational lifetime •A quantitative method is necessary to compare SoS design alternatives and understand the tradeoffs between diverse stakeholder preferences. What is a SoS? Design of future SoS will require quantitative concept exploration methods to improve SoS selection decisions Motivation Multi-Concept Responsive Disaster Surveillance Multi-Concept Responsive Disaster Surveillance Coordinating Observatories Coordinating Observatories Aircraft UAV Satellite A system-of-systems (SoS) is a set of collaboratively integrated systems that possess two additional properties: operational independence of the components and managerial independence of the components. (Maier 98) component system component system component system SoS global stakeholders local stakeholders local stakeholders local stakeholders Managerial Control (MC) Influence Participation Risk Likelihood of Participation 0 1 Effective Managerial Authority Local and Global Stakeholder Sets Legacy and New Systems Dynamic Composition Local and Global Stakeholder Sets Legacy and New Systems Dynamic Composition Consider managerial authority during SoS design Study SoS value delivery over time, accounting for dynamic composition Consider managerial authority during SoS design Study SoS value delivery over time, accounting for dynamic composition Legacy Systems New Systems Legacy Systems New Systems Legacy Systems New Systems SoS A SoS B SoS N T 1 T 2 T N ... Time-Varying Available Component Sets component systems Time Switching Cost SoS Variables Gap

A Method for System of Systems Tradespace Explorationseari.mit.edu/documents/posters/Final09_Poster_DC.pdf · 2009. 6. 29. · A Method for System of Systems Tradespace Exploration

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Method for System of Systems Tradespace Explorationseari.mit.edu/documents/posters/Final09_Poster_DC.pdf · 2009. 6. 29. · A Method for System of Systems Tradespace Exploration

For more information, please visit:

http://seari.mit.edu

A Method for System of Systems

Tradespace ExplorationDebarati Chattopadhyay, S.M. in Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009

Advisors: Dr. Donna Rhodes, Dr. Adam Ross

Biography

Debarati Chattopadhyay received a S.M. degree in Aeronautics and

Astronautics from MIT. Debarati has B.S. degrees in Computer Engineering

(2005) and Astrophysics(2004) from Lehigh University. She has worked in

mission operations for the Chandra X-ray Observatory at the Harvard-

Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

© 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Related PublicationsChattopadhyay, D., Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H., “A Framework for Tradespace Exploration of Systems of Systems”,

6th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Los Angeles, CA, April 2008.

Chattopadhyay, D., Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H., “Demonstration of System of Systems Multi-Attribute Tradespace

Exploration on a Multi-Concept Surveillance Architecture”, 7th Conference on Systems Engineering Research,

Loughborough, UK, April 2009.

Chattopadhyay, D., Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H., “Combining Attributes for Systems of Systems in Multi-Attribute

Tradespace Exploration”, 7th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Loughborough, UK, April 2009.

Chattopadhyay, D., Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H.,” A Practical Methodology for System of Systems Tradespace

Exploration”, AIAA Space 2009 Conference and Exposition, Pasadena, CA.

References

Maier, M.W., "Architecting Principles for Systems-of-Systems", Systems Engineering, 1, 4,

pp. 267-84, 1998.

Director, Systems and Software Engineering, “Systems Engineering Guide for Systems of Systems”,

Technical Report, Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics),

Washington, D.C., 2008.

Ross, A.M., and Rhodes, D.H., "Architecting Systems for Value Robustness: Research Motivations

and Progress," Annual IEEE Systems Conference, Montreal, Canada, April 2008.

System of Systems Tradespace Exploration

Method (SoSTEM)1.What are the characteristics that distinguish SoS design from

traditional system design?

2.What is a practical framework for SoS tradespace exploration?

3.How can the developed tradespace exploration framework be

used to select SoS designs that are value robust through the

SoS lifetime?

SoS Specific Considerations

Research Questions

SoS is defined as a set or arrangement of systems that results when independent and useful

systems are integrated into a larger systems that delivers unique capabilities. (DoD 2008)

Contributions

• Prescriptive, quantitative method for SoS tradespace exploration, called

System of Systems Tradespace Exploration Method (SoSTEM),

which enables the comparison of a large number of diverse SoS designs

on the same tradespace and the selection of value robust SoS designs

• Development of a framework for considering Managerial Control and

Influence within SoSTEM during SoS conceptual design

• System of Systems design requires sophisticated decision making under

high uncertainty to ensure selection of designs that maintain value over the

operational lifetime

• A quantitative method is necessary to compare SoS design alternatives

and understand the tradeoffs between diverse stakeholder preferences.

What is a SoS?

Design of future SoS will require quantitative concept exploration

methods to improve SoS selection decisions

Motivation

Multi-Concept Responsive

Disaster Surveillance

Multi-Concept Responsive

Disaster Surveillance

Coordinating ObservatoriesCoordinating Observatories

Aircraft

UAV

Satellite

A system-of-systems (SoS) is a set of collaboratively integrated systems that possess two additional

properties: operational independence of the components and managerial independence of the components. (Maier 98)

component

system

component

system

component

system

SoS

global stakeholders

local

stakeholders

local

stakeholders

local

stakeholders

Managerial Control (MC) Influence

Participation Risk

Likelihood of Participation0 1

Effective Managerial Authority

Local and Global

Stakeholder Sets

Legacy and New Systems

Dynamic Composition

Local and Global

Stakeholder Sets

Legacy and New Systems

Dynamic Composition

Consider managerial

authority during SoS

design

Study SoS value delivery

over time, accounting for

dynamic composition

Consider managerial

authority during SoS

design

Study SoS value delivery

over time, accounting for

dynamic composition

Legacy

Systems

New

Systems

Legacy

Systems

New

Systems

Legacy

Systems

New

Systems

SoSA SoSB SoSN

T1 T2 TN

...

Time-Varying Available Component Sets

component

systems

Time

Switching

Cost

SoS Variables

Gap