25
A mixed-methods study of vocabulary-related strategic behaviour in informal second language contact Saturday 17 th October 2015 jess.briggs@education. ox.ac.uk

A mixed-methods study of vocabulary- related strategic behaviour in informal second language contact Saturday 17 th October 2015 [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1

Slide 2 A mixed-methods study of vocabulary- related strategic behaviour in informal second language contact Saturday 17 th October 2015 [email protected] Slide 3 Informal L2 Contact: the What, the Why and the Who Outside of class; beyond institutional guidance Emergent contextual shift in SLA In L2 English learning: EFL, ESL, SA, EAL, economic migrants, refugees Slide 4 Strategic Behaviour in Informal L2 Contact Qualitative evidence Huebner (1995); Miller & Ginsberg (1995) Briggs (2014) Quantitative evidence Kojic-Sabo & Lightbown (1999) Lafford (2004) Segalowitz, Freed, Collentine, Lafford, Lazar & Daz-Campos (2005) Adams (2006) Slide 5 Research Questions 1.What vocabulary-related strategies that are available for use in informal L2 contact do study abroad learners identify with most? 2.How are vocabulary-related strategies manifested in informal L2 contact by study abroad learners? Slide 6 Sample N=241 adult, mixed-L1 SALA learners of English 7 UK language institutions for 6-20 weeks 41% male; 59% female Max. 25 hrs p/w instruction = majority of time outside of the classroom Minimum CEFR B1 (low intermediate) Slide 7 Instrumentation 1.Strategies questionnaire Cognitive operationalisation (Macaro, 2006) 28 items (Schmitt, 1997; Nation, 2001; Gu & Johnson, 1996; Oxford, 1990) 5-point how true of me scale 2.Opportunities With Language Simulator (OWLS) 8 computer-based simulations of informal L2 contact scenarios, each including target word/phrase predicted to prompt strategic behaviour Slide 8 Questionnaire Slide 9 Slide 10 Slide 11 Slide 12 Interview Schedule What are you thinking in this situation? Whats happening in your head? What would you do here? How exactly would you do that? Can you give me an example? Why would you do that? How do you think that would be helpful to you? Would you do anything else? If yes, what? Slide 13 Procedure Questionnaire n=241 administered after 2+ weeks OWLS interviews n=36 (18 matched pairs) approx. 2 weeks after questionnaire: simulations + interview schedule Slide 14 QUAN Analyses Cronbachs Alpha (.818) Means to determine strategies most identified with EFA to reveal underlying structure Slide 15 QUAL Analyses Individual strategies coded into 5 categories: 1.Planning 2.Individual determination of meaning 3.Interactive determination of meaning 4.Memorisation 5.Metacognition Combinations of strategies (clusters & chains as defined in Briggs, 2016) Slide 16 QUAN Findings What vocabulary-related strategies that are available for use in informal L2 contact do study abroad learners identify with most? Most identified with = basic word-meaning repetition/connection: Lawson & Hogben (1996) EFA revealed 5 underlying factors (ranked): 1.Cognitive Action strategies (solitary, cognitive prep. for use) 2. Appraisal strategies (making judgments) 3. Visual Reference strategies (using visual info.) 4. Establishment strategies (basis from which to work) 5. Context Provision strategies (linguistic situating) Slide 17 QUAL Findings How are vocabulary-related strategies manifested in informal L2 contact? Individual strategy use + Individual determination of meaning -Memorisation and Metacognition Scenario 5 = most strategic responses; most combinations (esp. chains) Slide 18 Simulation 5 (1) Individual: Planning Participant: If the sound I heard I like, I try to, to find the meaning of the word, but if is something is common or something that I not interesting, yes, I dont care, but if I like, I try to find the correct meaning and the correct words. Slide 19 Simulation 5 (2) Individual: Memorisation Participant: I dont know this word exactly. Vain, like ego? Interviewer: Yes! P: Ahhh, okay, okay, I know. Negative. I think Japanese is a little vain because Japanese can, er, some Japanese make up in the train, or... I: Yeah? Some British people do that! P: Oh really? So, um, my mother said if you make up in the train at foreign countries, um, its too rude, so I thought it is not good, not good to, but Japan is not so rude maybe, ah, I can remember this word now. Slide 20 Simulation 5 (2) Combination: Chains Participant: If I like this song, I will search the Internet. Interviewer: Where? What website? P: Mmm, Google. If I know the title, I search the title. Or if I know the singer, I search the singers information in the Internet. I: And if you dont know the title or the singer? P: I will listen many times and, so, gradually I can understand the words but if I cant understand the meaning of them, so I search the learn word in the Internet. Slide 21 Discussion (1) Cognitive Action strategies (strategies that are solitary, solely cognitive and comprise preparation for using the lexical item) 1.Use the item in a sentence as soon as possible 2.Connect the item to a personal experience* 3.Think of situations in which to use the item* 4.Think of words/phrases in English that have a similar/opposite meaning 5.Repeat the item in my head to help me remember it* 6.Remember the item to ask someone later for the meaning* 7.Think of a picture in my head to help remember the meaning 8.Imagine how the item is spelled Slide 22 Discussion (2) + Individual Determination -Memorisation/Metacognition Learner-, context- and task-specific nature of strategic behaviour in informal contact (Chamot, 2004; Macaro, 2004; Takeuchi, Griffiths & Coyle, 2007; Briggs 2014) Slide 23 Extended model of influencing factors in strategic behaviour in informal L2 contact Slide 24 Extending the conceptualisation of learner strategy application What does the OWLS data tell us re strategic behaviour in informal L2 contact? Macaros (2004:4) algorithm for learner strategy application: IF in a learning situation X, AND when the learning goal is Y, THEN try mental action Z. Extension specific to informal contact: IF L1 is T, AND when in cultural context U, AND in scenario V, AND when contextual intention is W, IF meets lexical item X, AND strategic intention is Y, THEN try strategic action Z. Slide 25 References (1) Adams, R. (2006). Language learning strategies in the study abroad context. In M.A. Dufon & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters (pp. 25992). Briggs, J.G. (2014). A context-specific research tool to probe the out-of-class vocabulary-related strategies of study-abroad learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. DOI: 10.1111/ijal.12070. Briggs, J.G. (2016). A mixed-methods study of vocabulary-related strategic behaviour in informal second language contact. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education (In press). Chamot, A.U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1, 14-26. Gu, Y. & Johnson, R. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46 (4), 643-679. Huebner, T. (1995). The effects of overseas language programs. In B.F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company (pp. 172-193). Kojic-Sabo, I. & Lightbown, P.M. (1999). Students' approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. Modern Language Journal, 83 (2), 176-192. Lafford, B. (2004). The effect of context of learning on the use of communication strategies by learners of Spanish as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26 (2), 201-26. Lawson, M.J. & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary-learning strategies of foreign- language students. Language Learning, 46, 101-135. Slide 26 References (2) Macaro, E. (2004). Fourteen Features of a Language Learner Strategy. Working Paper No. 4. Oxford: Department of Educational Studies, University of Oxford. Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: revising the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 90 (3), 320-337. Miller, L. & Ginsberg, R. (1995). Folklinguistic Theories of Language Learning. In B.F. Freed (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company (pp. 293- 315). Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies. What Every Teacher Should Know. Heinle, Boston. Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 199-227). Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., Collentine, J., Lafford, B., Lazar N. & Daz-Campos, M. (2005). A comparison of acquisition of Spanish as a second language in two different contexts of learning: Study Abroad and the regular academic classroom. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 1-18. Takeuchi, O., Griffiths, C. & Coyle, D. (2007). Applying strategies to contexts: the role of individual, situational, and group differences. In A.D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language Learning Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp. 68-92).