Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A study to validate the Elements of Green HRM
Practices with reference to IT Companies in
Greater Chennai
Mrs.C.R.Rhupa
Research Scholar (Part time),
PG & Research Department of Commerce,
Presidency College, Chennai.
&
Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce,
SSS Jain college For Women, Chennai.
Under the Guidance of :
Dr.G.Ravi Assistant Professor,
Research Guide & Supervisor,
PG & Research Department of Commerce,
Presidency College, Chennai.
Green Human Resources Management(GHRM) refers to using human resource management
practices to assist environmental management and to reduce employee carbon footprint . The
current research work is carried out to check the validation of elements of GHRM practices in
IT companies in Chennai. The main GHRM practices used in IT companies, identified from
existing literature were organisational culture, recruitment and selection, training and
development, employee participation and empowerment, performance appraisal system,
rewards and compensation. The study will provide insights to HR managers and IT
organisations to understand and increase the implementation of GHRM practices to support
environmental management for the mutual benefit of employers and employees.
Introduction
Many organisations have adopted environmental policies and procedures for sustainable
development. Besides economic objectives of profit and growth organisations are also
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/687
focussing on the imp-act they create on the society and environment . Business
organisations are forced to pay attention to environmental and social responsibility due to
regulatory pressures, demands of society and to have a competitive advantage. However
there is a gap between what companies aspire to do and what they achieve. Recent literature
show that Green HRM can be effectively used to implement environmental policies and
procedures in an organisation.
Green HRM is referred to “all the activities involved in development, implementation and
on-going maintenance of a system that aims at making employees of an organization green. It
is the side of HRM that is concerned with transforming normal employees into green
employees so as to achieve environmental goals of the organization and finally to make a
significant contribution to environmental sustainability. It refers to the policies, practices and
systems that make employees of the organization green for the benefit of the individual,
society, natural environment, and the business” (Opatha, 2013; Opatha and Anton Arulrajah,
2014).
Importance Of HRM In Environmental Management System
The strategy for responding towards environmental friendly business practices must begin
with real commitment on the part of whole organisation. This means a change in corporate
culture and management commitment towards social and environmental issues. Human
resource managers are well positioned to play an instrumental role in helping their
organization achieve its goals of becoming a socially and environmentally responsible firm.
HR processes play a significant role in the creation of sustainability culture within the
company and in translating Green HR policy into practice; therefore, human capital and its
management are instrumental to the fulfilment of EM objectives ( M. Wagner, 2012) .
GHRM is a proposal which helps to create green workforce that can understand and
appreciate green culture in an organization. Such green initiative can maintain its green
objectives all throughout the HRM process of recruiting, hiring and training, compensating,
developing, and advancing the firm’s human capital. Based on existing literature the
elements of Green HRM practices are:
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/688
Organisational Culture
Organisational Green culture refers to the set of assumptions, beliefs, values, and symbols
that reflect the desire or necessity of being an environmentally oriented organization. The top
management must be committed continuously to support Green HR practices by
implementing policies, broadcast environmental programs and goals and also implements an
environmental management information system and conduct periodical audits ( Jabbour and
Santos, 2008) .
Green Recruitment And Selection
Green recruitment can be defined as the process of hiring individuals with knowledge, skills,
approaches, and behaviours that are appropriate to the environmental management systems
within an organization. When selecting for job vacancies some companies consider the
candidate's environmental concern and interest as selection criteria (Renwick et al., 2013).
Green Training And Development
Training and development practice focus on the development of employees' skills,
knowledge, and attitudes that prevent deterioration of EM-related knowledge, skills, and
attitudes. Green training and development educate employees about the value of EM, train
them in working methods that conserve energy, reduce waste, and provide an opportunity to
engage employees in environmental problem-solving ( Jabbour, 2013) .
Employee Participation and Employee Empowerment
Employee relations in HRM is concerned with establishing an amicable employer-employee
relationship. The relationship facilitates the motivation and morale of the employees as well
as increases productivity. Employee participation in Green initiatives increases the chances of
better green management as it aligns employees' goals, capabilities, motivations, and
perceptions with green management practices and systems (Jabbour and Santos, 2008).
Performance Appraisal System
Effective performance appraisals should provide useful feedback to employees and support
continuous improvements in the firm’s environmental outcomes. The job description should
be aligned with green tasks and goals to be achieved. Managers should discuss the
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/689
performance of the employees and give the needed feedback to enhance their knowledge,
skills, and ability (Arulrajah et al., 2015).
Green Reward And Compensation
Rewards and compensation are the major green HRM processes through which employees
are rewarded for their performance. Due to the difficulty of accurately and fairly evaluating
environmental behaviours and performance, developing effective monetary incentives can be
challenging. By incorporating elements of green management in the compensation program,
managers can promote green behaviors among the employees (Jabbour and Santos, 2008).
Review of Literature
Arulrajah Anton, et al. (2015) ,identified and highlighted several green HRM practices
under the 12 functions of HRM such as job design, job analysis, human resource planning,
recruitment, selection, induction, performance evaluation, training and development, reward ,
discipline, health and safety and employee relations based on available literature. The study
emphasized the importance of adopting green HRM to improve environmental performance.
Bangwal Deepak, et al. (2017), proposed a theoretical model for identifying the direct and
indirect effects of green HRM on environmental performance (EPF) from an employee point
of view. The study revealed that the majority of employees agree that HRM policies had a
positive result on the EPF irrespective of gender, type of job, and age. Employees behavior
toward environmental practices vary due to experiences in private and work life. There
should be a greater incorporation of GHRM in environmental practices through better
implementation and guidance.
Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2012), presented a review of research which helps in identifying how
organizations adopt Green HRM for promoting EMS initiatives. The study also highlights
the benefits of adopting green HRM practices for both employees and the company. Through
Green HRM practices employees will be empowered to adopt environmental management.
Daily, B. F. and Huang, S. (2001) , identified human resource factors such as top
management support, environmental training, employee empowerment, teamwork and reward
systems as key elements of the implementation process of an Environmental Management
System and proposed a conceptual model of the EMSHR factors to assist in proper
implementation of the environmental management program. The study highlights the need to
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/690
make the necessary changes in Organisational culture to facilitate Environmental
Management.
Dumont Jenny, et al. ( 2016), empirically tested effects of Green HRM Practices on
employee workplace behaviour. The study developed measures for green HRM and then
tested a conceptual model integrating the effects of psychological green climate and
individual green values. The findings reveal that both in the role and extra role of green
behavior are related to organizational green HRM practices. Organizations should link
employee green behavior to green management objectives.
Guerci M, et al. (2013) analyses how ability-enhancing practices and opportunity enhancing
practices improve organizational ethical climates, while motivation enhancing practices are
related to egoistic climates. The findings highlight the effect of employee perception on
corporate sustainability.
Hiba A. Masri, Ayham A.M. Jaaron (2016) conducted an empirical study to study the impact
of GHRM practices in manufacturing organizations on Environmental Performance in the
Palestinian context. The study also identifies six main Green HRM practices such as green
recruitment and selection, green training and development, green performance management
and appraisal, green reward and compensation, green employee empowerment and
participation, and green management of organizational culture.
Jabbour, C.J.C. (2011) conducted an empirical study to analyze the level of the greening of
HRM practices for environmental sustainability. The study reveals that human resource
practices such as culture, teams, and training were supportive of environmental management
where practices such as selection and financial remuneration were ignored in environmental
performance.
Jabbour, C.J.C. and Fernando Ce´sar Almada Santos (2008), have proposed a model to
analyze the relationship between human resource dimensions and environmental
management. The study emphasizes the importance of a plan and executes an HR strategy
that facilitates environmental management. The HR factors of recruitment and selection,
training, performance appraisal, and rewards contribute to implementing and maintaining an
environmental management system whereas organizational learning, culture, and the team
has to support environmental management system. The study highlights the need to develop
a socio-economic perspective that aims at using resources efficiently.
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/691
Kaur Harjeet (2011) conducted an empirical study to ascertain the relationships between
human resource factors and environmental performance in manufacturing companies. HR
factors such as management commitment, feedback and review, and empowerment were
positively related to environmental performance whereas incentive, bonus and salaries were
rarely linked to environmental performance.
Mandip Gill (2012 ) proposed a model of the HR processes involved in green HRM based on
available literature on green HR. The study revealed the role that HR processes play in
translating green HR policy into practice. A case study on the green HR initiatives of ITC
emphasizes the importance of operational efficiencies and upgradation of technology.
Mübeyyen Tepe Küçüko÷lu1 and øbrahim PÕnar R. (2015) their paper presents an important
study which shows an analysis of companies' impact on their employees' environmental
behavior and environmental organizational culture in Turkey. The facilitators and barriers to
environmental applications within the company and the role of environmental organizational
culture on environmental behavior are evaluated. The findings revealed that the organization
has a clear understanding of its environmental impact and the most important motivator is
regulations for the environmental actions of an organization. All levels of an organization
hierarchy should move together for a successful environmental culture.
Opatha, H. H. D. N. P. and Arulrajah Anton, A. (2014) establish a strong link between
existing literature in green HRM and organizational theories. The research identified major
green HRM requirements for achieving environmental objectives namely green
competencies, green attitude, green behavior, and green results.
Pandey Suruchi, et al. (2016), the study analyzed the factors affecting the implementation of
GHRM and the awareness level of employees. The findings revealed that the majority of
employees were aware of Green HRM and felt that it was effectively implemented in their
organizations. Employee mindset and organizational culture were identified as important
factors for the implementation of sustainable practices. Most of the small organizations find
cost as a barrier to the implementation of GHRM practices.
Renwick, D.W.S. Redman, T. and Maguire, S. (2008)by reviewing the previous literature
have identified the importance of Green HRM in Environmental Management. The study
proposes a model to implement Green HR policies from employee entry to exit. There is a
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/692
need to diversify roles for HR staff in implementing Green HRM effectively at the
workplace.
Revill Claire, (2002), This paper examined the emerging concept of the 'greening' of
Personnel and Human Resource Management (HRM). From a comparative analysis, twelve
key HRM attributes were identified that can be easily applied to the concepts of
environmental human resource management. The study suggested how Personnel
Management and/or HRM can become involved in the development, implementation, and
integration of Environmental Management initiatives such as activities, policies, and
practices.
Roscoe Samuel, et al. (2019), examined the relationship between GHRM practices, green
organizational culture, and a firm's environmental performance. The findings suggest that
HRM practices including hiring, training, appraisal and incentive support the improvement of
green organizational culture. The key facilitators of green organizational culture include
leadership emphasis, message credibility, peer involvement, and employee empowerment.
Managers are provided with a detailed understanding of the GHRM practices needed to
enable an organizational culture of environmentally aware employees.
Sakhawalkar Akshata, Thadani Anand (2013), in their empirical study checked the
awareness among employees in IT companies in Pune about Green HR. The findings
revealed that though employees were not aware of the term Green HR they were aware of the
practices followed. The green HR methods were effectively implemented in organizations.
Wagner Marcus (2012) conducted an empirical study to analyze whether benefits arising for
human resource management from environmental management activities compel
environmental management system implementation. The study provides evidence that
increasing levels of environmental management system implementation result from higher
economic benefits. The article supplies needed quantitative evidence that there is a positive
association between work satisfaction and EMS implementation.
Research Gap
To date there is a shortage of empirical research addressing the elements of
Green HRM.
Green HRM is an ongoing and dynamic process, other factors may also contribute
to its implementation.
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/693
Future research should include a diverse sample to study the Green HRM
practices in various industries.
Objectives of Study
The objective of the study is to
Identify the various elements of Green HRM practices
To validate the impact of Green HRM practices in IT companies
Hypothesis
1.The Organisational Culture in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM Practices of
IT Companies in Chennai.
2. The Recruitment and Selection in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM
Practices.
3.The Training and Development in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM
Practices.
4. The Employee Participation and Employee Empowerment in the IT Companies does not
predict Green HRM Practices.
5.The Performance Appraisal System in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM
Practices.
6. The Rewards and Compensation in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM
Practices.
Research Methodology
The targeted population was employees from top 5 IT companies in Chennai. A total
sample of 687 employees was collected through convenient sampling method. The
questionnaire method was used to collect the personal details of employees and the elements
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/694
of green HRM practices. These elements are ascertained through Likert’s five point scale
which ranges from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree.
Data Analysis and Intrepretation
After reviewing the national and international literature and empirical research works on
GHRM practices the researcher identified the following elements namely: Organisational
Culture, Recruitment & Training ,Training & Development, Employee participation and
Empowerment, Performance appraisal system, Rewards & compensation are very important
to determine the employee perception on Green HRM practices. To exactly estimate the
opinion of respondents for all the statements and to test the hypothesis the researcher
applied T- test and the following results are obtained.
H1 :The Organisational Culture in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM Practices
of IT Companies in Chennai.
1. Employee perception on Organisational Culture.
The Organisational Culture consists of 15 variables in Likert’s five point scale which ranges
from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree with the mid value of 3. This mid value is taken up
as test value by the researcher to apply T test. The mean values between 3 & 4 for each
statement is considered as moderately agreeing for the statement, any mean value greater
than 4 is taken up as strongly agree statement. Any mean value less than 3 is considered as
disagreeing for the statement. The application of T test for test value 3 over all these 15
variables is clearly presented in the following table :
One Sample Statistics
Statements
N
Mean
Std
Deviation
Std
Error
mean
t
Rank
The Organisation is committed
to Environmental Management. 687 3.8122 1.00348 .03828 21.215
1
The Organisation believes that
involving in sustainability
practices will lead to better
Organizational culture.
687 3.7817 .98476 .03757 20.805
2
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/695
The Organisation has formal
policies for implementing green
HR practices in their
organization.
687 3.6725 1.02683 .03918 17.166
4
The Organisation allocates
adequate resources (money,
manpower etc) to
Environmental Management
efforts.
687 3.6143 1.06137 .04049 15.169
9
The Organisation designs and
implements new jobs and
positions in order to focus
exclusively on environmental
management .
687 3.5633 .99781 .03807 14.797
10
Progress towards environmental
goals is constantly monitored
and measured.
687 3.6958 1.06318 .04056 17.153
5
Top management frequently
communicates the organization’s
environmental goals to
employees.
687 3.6128 1.02235 .03901 15.711
8
Top management is committed
to employee training and
education in environmental
management.
687 3.5852 1.09249 .04168 14.039
11
Employees have the opportunity
to share in and are encouraged to
help the organization implement
change.
687 3.6856 .95381 .03639 18.840
3
Top Managers use teamwork to
successfully manage and
produce awareness of
environmental issues of the
687 3.6157 .94957 .03623 16.996
6
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/696
Company.
The organisation has an
environmental management
information system (EMIS) and
conducts environmental audits.
687 3.4862 .97462 .03718 13.075
12
Results from environmental
audits are communicated to
employees for identifying areas
for environmental improvement.
687 3.3843 .97681 .03727 10.311
13
Top Management develops
punishment system and penalties
for noncompliance in
environmental practices.
687 3.2067 1.10039 .04198 4.923
15
Employee survey is conducted
to assess organisational
performance with regard to
implementing green business
practice and provide
information, suggestions and
insight for future actions.
687 3.4236 1.08779 .04150 10.206
14
HR can serve as the driver for
cultural change in sustainability.
687 3.6332 .98647 .03764 16.824
7
From above table it is found that 15 variables of Organisational culture have their mean
value ranging from 3.2067 to 3.8122, Standard deviation lies within the range from
.94957 to 1.10039 , Standard error mean have their limitations between .03623 to .04198
and T value have their minimum and maximum limitation from 4.923 to 21.215. This
implies that the employees of IT companies moderately agree for the commitment of
Organisation to environmental management and sustainable practices resulting in better
organisational culture and the organisation has formal policies for implementing Green
HRM practices in their organisations. The table indicates that the organisations have
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/697
allocated sufficient resources and implemented new jobs and positions towards
Environmental management and the progress closely supervised. It further shows that the
top management communicates the environmental goals and use team work to create
awareness on environmental issues and have also developed punishment system and
penalties for noncompliance . The organisation has an effective environmental management
information system and regular environmental audits. Employees are encouraged to help the
organisation to implement change and employee surveys are conducted to assess the green
HRM practices and provide suggestions for future actions. The respondents agree that HR is
the major role player in implementing GHRM practices and policies. The above results
indicate that organisational culture predicts Green HRM practices therefore the hypotheses is
rejected.
H2:The Recruitment and Selection in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM
Practices.
2. Employee perception on Recruitment and Selection
Recruitment and selection consists 6 variables in Likert’s five point scale which ranges
from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree with the mid value of 3. This mid value is taken up
as test value by the researcher to apply T test. The mean values between 3 & 4 for each
statement is considered as moderately agreeing for the statement, any mean value greater
than 4 is taken up as strongly agree statement. Any mean value less than 3 is considered as
disagreeing for the statement. The application of T test for test value 3 over all these 6
variables is clearly presented in the following table :
One Sample Statistics
Statements
N
Mean
Std
Deviation
Std
Error
mean
t
Rank
1. The Environmental performance
of the Organisation attracts
employees.
687 3.2606 .98113 .03743 6.961
5
2. The Organisation reflects 687 3.2460 .93477 .03566 6.898
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/698
environmental policy and
strategies in its recruitment
policy .
6
3. The Organisation prefers to
select candidates who have
competency and attitudes to
participate in corporate
environmental management
initiatives .
687 3.3130 1.00561 .03837 8.157
3
The recruitment practices
support effective environment
management by ensuring that
new recruits understand the
organization’s environmental
culture and share its
environmental values.
687
3.2868
1.02910
.03926
7.303
4
The organisation practices a
paper-free recruitment process
with a minimal environmental
impact (e-mail, online
application forms , telephone or
video-based interviews , etc )
687 3.5124 1.04953 .04004 12.796
2
4. Green recruitment helps to
reduce recruitment cost and time
by 80%.
687 3.5604 .93619 .03572 15.690
1
From above table it is found that 6 variables of Recruitment and Selection have their mean
value ranging from 3.2460 to 3.5604, Standard deviation lies within the range from
.93477 to 1.04953 , Standard error mean have their limitations between .03566 to .04004
and T value have their minimum and maximum limitation from 6.898 to 15.690. This
shows that the environmental performance of the organisation attracts employees and the
organisational recruitment policy reflects the environmental policies and strategies. The
organisation prefers to hire employees that have environmental knowledge and ensure that
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/699
the new recruits understand the organisations environmental culture and values. The
employees of IT companies agree that Green Recruitment reduces the cost and time by
practicing paper free recruitment process with minimum environmental impact. The above
results indicate that recruitment and selection predicts Green HRM practices therefore the
hypotheses is rejected.
H3: The Training and Development in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM
Practices.
3. Employee perception on Training and Development
Training and Development consists 6 variables in Likert’s five point scale which ranges
from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree with the mid value of 3. This mid value is taken up
as test value by the researcher to apply T test. The mean values between 3 & 4 for each
statement is considered as moderately agreeing for the statement, any mean value greater
than 4 is taken up as strongly agree statement. Any mean value less than 3 is considered as
disagreeing for the statement. The application of T test for test value 3 over all these 6
variables is clearly presented in the following table :
One Sample Statistics
Statements
N
Mean
Std
Deviation
Std
Error
mean
t
Rank
The organisation considers
environmental training a priority
and is continuous.
687 3.3799 1.00715 .03843 9.887
6
Analysing and identifying
environmental training needs of
employees in order to make
them more environmental
concerned.
687 3.4192 1.01968 .03890 10.776
4
Organisation offers workshops
or forums for staff to improve 687 3.4032 1.00676 .03841 10.497
5
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/700
environmental behaviour and
exchange their tacit knowledge.
Providing training to learn or
adapt environmental friendly
best practices (energy efficiency,
waste management, and
recycling).
687 3.4338 .96645 .03687 11.764
2
Embedding of routines within
operational systems is essential
to the successful implementation
of any environmental initiative.
687 3.5837 .95446 .03641 16.029
1
Employees have many
opportunities to use their
environmental training.
687 3.4265 .95377 .03639 11.720
3
From above table it is found that 6 variables of Training and Development have their mean
value ranging from 3.3799 to 3.5837, Standard deviation lies within the range from
.95377 to 1.01968 , Standard error mean have their limitations between .03639 to .03890
and T value have their minimum and maximum limitation from 9.887 to 16.029. The table
indicates that the organisation considers environmental training a priority and take steps to
identify the training needs of the IT employees . The organisation provides training for the
staff to improve environmental behaviour through workshops, forums and training
programs and the employees are given opportunities to use their environmental training
effectively . The employees agree that embedding of routines within operational systems is
essential for implementation of environmental initiatives. The above results indicate that
training and development predicts Green HRM practices therefore the hypotheses is
rejected.
H4:The Employee Participation and Employee Empowerment in the IT Companies does not
predict Green HRM Practices.
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/701
4. Employee perception on Employee participation and Empowerment
Employee perception on Employee participation and Empowerment consists 6 variables in
Likert’s five point scale which ranges from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree with the mid
value of 3. This mid value is taken up as test value by the researcher to apply T test. The
mean values between 3 & 4 for each statement is considered as moderately agreeing for
the statement, any mean value greater than 4 is taken up as strongly agree statement. Any
mean value less than 3 is considered as disagreeing for the statement. The application of T
test for test value 3 over all these 6 variables is clearly presented in the following table :
One Sample Statistics
Statements
N
Mean
Std
Deviation
Std
Error
mean
t
Rank
The Organisation links employee
involvement and participation in
environmental management
programmes.
687 3.3785 .95344 .03638 10.404
5
The employees use input
resources efficiently when they
perform their day to day job
tasks, duties and responsibilities.
687 3.3959 .97663 .03726 10.626
4
Top management encourages
employee suggestions for
environmental performance
improvement by setting up
employee environmental
suggestion schemes.
687 3.4978 .92562 .03531 14.097
1
Employees can express their
opinions openly and freely
without fear of reprisal.
687 3.5124 .98357 .03753 13.654
2
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/702
Employees feel they are
accountable for environmental
outcomes.
687 3.3843 1.05984 .04044 9.504
6
The Unions and employee help
employers to adopt Green HRM
policies and practices that help
safeguard and enhance worker
health and well-being.
687 3.4207 .97597 .03724 11.298
3
From above table it is found that 6 variables of Employee participation and empowerment
have their mean value ranging from 3.3785 to 3.5124, Standard deviation lies within the
range from .92562 to 1.05984 , Standard error mean have their limitations between .03531
to .04044 and T value have their minimum and maximum limitation from 9.504 to 14.09.
This implies that the employees of IT companies moderately agree that the organisations
have linked employee involvement and participation in environmental management
programmes to ensure that the employees use the resources efficiently when they perform
their day to day tasks. Top management encourages employee suggestions for environmental
performance and employees can express their opinions freely without fear of punishment.
Employees feel that they are accountable for environmental outcomes and help the
employers to adopt Green HRM policies and practices that help safeguard and enhance
worker health and well- being. The above results indicate that employee participation and
empowerment predicts Green HRM practices therefore the hypotheses is rejected.
H5:The Performance Appraisal System in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM
Practices.
5. Employee perception on Performance appraisal system
Employee perception on Performance appraisal system consists 6 variables in Likert’s five
point scale which ranges from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree with the mid value of 3.
This mid value is taken up as test value by the researcher to apply T test. The mean values
between 3 & 4 for each statement is considered as moderately agreeing for the
statement, any mean value greater than 4 is taken up as strongly agree statement. Any mean
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/703
value less than 3 is considered as disagreeing for the statement. The application of T test for
test value 3 over all these 6 variables is clearly presented in the following table :
One Sample Statistics
Statements
N
Mean
Std
Deviation
Std
Error
mean
t
Rank
1. The organisation incorporates
environmental management
objectives and targets with the
performance evaluation system
of the organisation.
687 3.2198 1.09718 .04186 5.251
2
Employees are aware of
specific environmental goals,
targets and responsibilities.
687 3.3435 .94524 .03606 9.526
1
Role of managers in achieving
green outcomes are included in
appraisals.
687 3.1951 1.07981 .04120 4.735
3
Integrating green criteria in
appraisals or evaluating
employee‟s job performance
according to green-related
criteria.
687 3.1383 .98817 .03770 3.668
4
Providing regular feedback to
the employees or teams to
achieve environmental goals or
improve their environmental
performance.
687 3.1194 .98102 .03743 3.189
5
Achievement of environmental 687 3.0844 1.03939 .03966 2.129
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/704
goals is used as one of the
criteria in my performance
appraisal.
6
From above table it is found that 6 variables of Performance appraisal system have their
mean value ranging from 3.0844 to 3.3435, Standard deviation lies within the range from
.94524 to 1.09718 , Standard error mean have their limitations between .03606 to .04186
and T value have their minimum and maximum limitation from 2.129 to 9.526. The table
shows that the organisations have linked environmental management objectives with the
performance evaluation system and the employees are aware of their specific environmental
goals, targets and responsibilities. Employees moderately agree that the job performance is
evaluated according to green related criteria and regular feedback is provided to the
employees to improve their environmental performance. The Role of managers in
accomplishing green outcomes and the achievement of environmental goals by each
employee is used as one of the criteria in performance appraisal. The above results indicate
that Performance appraisal system predicts Green HRM practices therefore the hypotheses is
rejected.
H6:The Rewards and Compensation in the IT Companies does not predict Green HRM
Practices.
6. Employee perception on Rewards and Compensation
Employee perception on Rewards and compensation consists 6 variables in Likert’s five
point scale which ranges from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree with the mid value of 3.
This mid value is taken up as test value by the researcher to apply T test. The mean values
between 3 & 4 for each statement is considered as moderately agreeing for the
statement, any mean value greater than 4 is taken up as strongly agree statement. Any mean
value less than 3 is considered as disagreeing for the statement. The application of T test for
test value 3 over all these 6 variables is clearly presented in the following table :
One Sample Statistics
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/705
Statements
N
Mean
Std
Deviation
Std
Error
mean
t
Rank
Environmental performance is
recognized publicly . 687 3.3654 .89157 .03402 10.741
2
Employees who have achieved
or surpassed their environmental
goals are rewarded with
monetary awards
687 3.2242 .91272 .03482 6.437
4
Presentation of non financial
incentives helps improve
employee motivation to take
part in environment
management programs.
687 3.3916 .95502 .03644 10.746
1
Tying incentive pay to the
attainment of environmental
goals helps focus managers’
attention and invigorate efforts
aimed at achieving them.
687 3.2620 .91858 .03505 7.476
3
The Organisation has developed
negative reinforcements in EM
(criticism, warnings,
suspensions for lapses)
687 3.0830 .90049 .03436 2.415
6
I feel that if I do not contribute
to improving environmental
performance, my chance of
career advancement will be
negatively affected.
687 3.0975 1.01193 .03861 2.526
5
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/706
From above table it is found that 6 variables of Rewards and Compensation have their
mean value ranging from 3.0830 to 3.3916, Standard deviation lies within the range from
.89157 to 1.01193 , Standard error mean have their limitations between .03402 to .03861
and T value have their minimum and maximum limitation from 2.415 to 10.746. This
implies that the employees of IT companies moderately agree that environmental
performance is recognized publicly and employees who have achieved their environmental
goals are rewarded with monetary awards. Presentation of non financial incentives has
helped to improve employee motivation to take part in environment management programs
and Tying incentive pay to the attainment of environmental goals helps focus managers’
attention and invigorate efforts aimed at achieving them. The organisation has developed
negative reinforcements in Environmental Management and the employees moderately
agree that if they do not contribute to environmental performance their chances of career
advancement are affected. The above results indicate that rewards and compensation predicts
Green HRM practices therefore the hypotheses is rejected.
Finding and Conclusions
1.The employees of IT Companies in Greater Chennai strongly agreed that the organizations
are very optimistic and conducive to the work environment and very viable to sustainable
practices. They strongly believed that the organization allocates adequate resources to
environmental management efforts for the prudential benefits of the organization as well as to
the society.
2. As far as the recruitment and selection are concerned the employees strongly agreed that
the recruitment practices in their organization mainly support the strategic environmental
management. They also strongly agree that the environmental management of IT companies
is done by ensuring that the recruits understand the commitment of the organization towards
all kinds of strategic environmental values.
3.The main aim of all the IT companies is to give appropriate training and development
programs to their employees with the priority on environmental issues, environmental
behavior, environmental knowledge and environmentally friendly approach for the futuristic
benefits of the organization.
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/707
4.The employees in IT companies in Greater Chennai agree that the organisations have
linked employee involvement and participation in environmental management programmes
to ensure that the employees use the resources efficiently when they perform their day to
day tasks.
5. Organisations have linked environmental management objectives with the performance
evaluation system and the employees are aware of their specific environmental goals,
targets and responsibilities.
6. Employees of IT companies moderately agree that environmental performance is
recognized publicly and employees who have achieved their environmental goals are
rewarded with monetary awards.
Today, organisations are aware of their responsibility to the environment and are taking
efforts to link HR practices with environmental programs . IT organisations are supporting
green practices through waste management, energy efficient lighting, reducing paper usage,
alternative work policies and creating a safe and healthy workplace. The Human Resources
Department has an important role to create awareness among employees and provide the
necessary resources and motivation to adopt environment friendly practices.
References
1. Arulrajah Anton, et al. (2015), "Green Human Resource Management Practices: A
Review", Sri Lankan Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.5, No.1, 2015.
2. Bangwal Deepak, et al. (2017), "Green HRM, work-life and environment
performance", IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), eISSN: 2278-487X,
p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 17, Issue 12 .Ver. I (Dec.
2015), PP 45-53 www.iosrjournals.
3. Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2012), "A Study of Green HR Practices and Its Effective
Implementation in the Organization: A Review". International Journal of Business and
Management, 7, 25–33.
4. Daily, B. F. and Huang, S. (2001), "Achieving Sustainability Through Attention to
Human Resource Factors in Environmental Management", International Journal of Operation
and Production Management, Vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1539-1552.
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/708
5. Dumont Jenny, et al. ( 2016), "Effects Of Green Hrm Practices On Employee
Workplace Green Behavior: The Role Of Psychological Green Climate And Employee Green
Values", Human Resource Management 2016, Published online in Wiley Online Library,
DOI:10.1002/hrm.21792.
6. Guerci M., et al. (2013), "The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices and
Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Ethical Climates: An Employee Perspective",
Journal of Business Ethics, ISSN 0167-4544, ZDB-ID 868017-6. - Vol. 126.2015, 2, p. 325-
342.
7. Hiba A. Masri, Ayham A.M. Jaaron (2016), "Assessing Green Human Resources
Management practices in Palestinian manufacturing context: An empirical study". Journal of
Cleaner Production (2017), DOI:10.1016/ j.j clepro.2016.12.087.
8. Jabbour, C.J.C. and Fernando Ce´sar Almada Santos (2008), " Relationships between
human resource dimensions and environmental management in companies: proposal of a
model", Journal of Cleaner Production, Amsterdam, v. 16, n. 1, p. 51-58, Jan. 2008.
9. Jabbour Chiappetta, Charbel Jose & Santos, Fernando & Nagano, Marcelo. (2010).
Contributions of HRM throughout the stages of environmental management: Methodological
triangulation applied to companies in Brazil. The International Journal of Human Resource
Management. 21. 10491089. 10.1080/09585191003783512.
10. Jabbour, C.J.C. (2011), "How green are HRM practices, organizational culture,
learning, and teamwork? A Brazilian study. Industrial and Commercial Training", 43(2): 98-
105.
11. Kaur Harjeet (2011) "Impact of Human Resource Factors on Perceived
Environmental Performance: an Empirical Analysis of a Sample of ISO 14001 EMS
Companies in Malaysia", Journal of sustainable development, Vol.4 No.1, pp. 211-223.
12. Mandip Gill (2012 ) "Green HRM: People Management Commitment to
Environmental Sustainability" http://www.isca.in/rjrs/archive/iscsi/38.ISCAISC-2011-
18CLM-Com-03.pdf accessed on 6 July 2014.
13. Mübeyyen Tepe Küçüko÷lu1 and øbrahim PÕnar R. (2015), "Go Green at Work:
Environmental Organizational Culture", Modern Environmental Science and Engineering
(ISSN 2333-2581), July 2015, Volume 1, No. 2, pp. 79-88.
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/709
14. Opatha, H. H. D. N. P. and Arulrajah Anton, A. (2014), "Green Human Resource
Management: A Simplified General Reflections", International Business Research, Vol. 7,
No. 8, pp. 101-112.
15. Pandey Suruchi, et al. (2016) "Sustainable Green HRM – Importance and Factors
affecting Successful Implementation in Organizations" International Journal of Research in
Management and Business (ISSN: 2395-4329): Volume 2 Issue 3.
16. Renwick, D.W.S. Redman, T. and Maguire, S. (2008), "Green HRM: A Review,
Process Model, and Research Agenda", University of Sheffield Working Paper.
http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/content/1/c6/08/70/89/2008-01.pdf.
17. Revill Claire, (2002), "The ‘Greening' of Personnel/Human Resource Management
An Assessment", International Journal of Applied HRM: Volume 1 Issue 3, ISSN 1742-
2604.
18. Roscoe Samuel, et al. (2019), "Green human resource management and the enablers of
green organizational culture: enhancing a firm's environmental performance for sustainable
development", Business Strategy and the Environment, Manuscript ID BSE-18-0375.
19. Sakhawalkar Akshata, Thadani Anand (2013), "To Study the Current Green HR
Practices and There Responsiveness among the Employees of I.T. Sector in Pune Region",
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064, Volume 4
Issue 1, January 2015.
20. Wagner Marcus (2012)," Green Human Resource Benefits: Do they Matter as
Determinants of Environmental Management System Implementation?", Journal of Business
Ethics, Vol. 114, No. 3 (May 2013), pp. 443-456.
ADALYA JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN NO: 1301-2746
http://adalyajournal.com/710