A.2 Index for Representations received under Regulation 20 · LP17 Cllr Julian Mott 33 LP18 Mr P Sharpe, Inland Waterways Association 35 LP19 Ms Sharon Farnell, Rocester Parish Council

Rep ID Name Page number

LP1 Mr Keith Sunley 1 LP2 Rev’d George Crossley 4 LP4 Mr Robert Dodman 6 LP5 Mr Jim Jacobs on behalf of Mr I Shipton 8 LP6 Mr Anthony R Barrington 11 LP7 Mr and Mrs Cossar 13 LP8 Mr C Crowe 15 LP9 Mr I L Brown 17 LP10 Mr S Miller 19 LP11 Mr Bryan Chinn 22 LP12 Mrs Margaret Betson 24 LP13 Mr R Dodman 25 LP14 Mr R Dodman 27 LP15 Mrs Ann Wynniatt-Husey 29 LP16 Mrs Jessie Gent 31 LP17 Cllr Julian Mott 33 LP18 Mr P Sharpe, Inland Waterways Association 35 LP19 Ms Sharon Farnell, Rocester Parish Council 39 LP20 Ms Sharon Farnell, Rocester Parish Council 41 LP21 Ms Sharon Farnell, Rocester Parish Council 43 LP22 Ms Sharon Farnell, Rocester Parish Council 45 LP23 Mr R Dodman 47 LP24 Mr A Barton 49 LP25 Mrs Amanda Smith, Stretton Parish Council 51 LP26 Mrs Amanda Smith, Stretton Parish Council 54 LP27 Mrs Valerie Burton, Burton Civic Society 56 LP28 Mr J Connolly 58 LP29 Mr C Bygrave 61 LP30 Miss E Webb 64 LP31 Dr R Barrington 67 LP32 Mr P Smith 70 LP33 Mr P Reynolds 72 LP34 Mrs S Barrington 74 LP35 Mr D Faulkner 77 LP36 Mr B Edwards 80 LP37 Mr B Edwards 83 LP38 Mr B Edwards 86 LP39 Mr B Edwards 89 LP40 Mrs L Richardson 92 LP41 Miss Johanna Fox 95 LP42 Mr P Richardson 99 LP43 Mr B Edwards 102 LP44 Mr B Edwards 104 LP45 Mr B Edwards 107 LP46 Mr B Edwards 109 LP47 Mr B Edwards 111

A.2 Index for Representations received under Regulation 20

http://eaststaffsbc-consult.limehouse.co.uk/common/search/advanced_search.jsp?id=791344&lookingFor=representations&tab=list

LP48 Mr B Edwards 113 LP49 Mr B Edwards 115 LP50 Mr B Edwards 117 LP51 Mr B Edwards 120 LP52 Mr B Edwards 122 LP53 Residents of Fennel Close (Mrs Hilary Meldrum) 124 LP54 Mr. G. Whitehead 127 LP55 Mr. G. Whitehead 129 LP56 Ms. M. Bettson 131 LP57 Ms M. Turner 133 LP58 Ms J. Dunnicliff 135 LP59 Rev. Alexander Nicoll 137 LP60 Mr. M. Harrison - The Coal Authority 139 LP61 Mr. R. Statham, JH Statham & Son 141 LP62 Ms A Marrison 143 LP63 Mr. R. Brown 145 LP64 Ms J. Langston 148 LP65 Ms. A Brazendale 151 LP66 Uttoxeter Rural Parish Council (Mr M. Bagguley) 154 LP67 Mr. G. Taylor 157 LP68 St Modwen (West of Uttoxeter) 159 LP69 Marchington Parish Council (Ms L. Hoptroff) 162 LP70 St Modwen (West of Uttoxeter) 165 LP71 St Modwen (West of Uttoxeter) 168 LP72 Marchington Parish Council 171 LP73 St Modwen (West of Uttoxeter) 174 LP74 St Modwen (West of Uttoxeter) 178 LP75 St Modwen (West of Uttoxeter) 182 LP76 Mrs H. Faulkner 187 LP77 St Modwen (West of Uttoxeter) 190 LP78 Mrs. K. Arnold 193 LP79 Mr. & Mrs. S. Richardson 195 LP80 Ms K. Arblaster 199 LP81 Ms M. Miller 202 LP82 Royal Mail Group 205 LP83 Bellway Homes (RPS - Mr. Chris O’Hanlon) 207 LP84 Mr. D. Yorke 213 LP85 Mr. D. Yorke 216 LP86 Mr. D. Yorke 219 LP87 Mr. D. Yorke 221 LP88 Mr. D. Yorke 223 LP89 Mr. D. Yorke 225 LP90 Mr. D. Yorke 228 LP91 Mr. D. Yorke 230 LP92 Mr. D. Yorke 232 LP93 Mr. D. Yorke 234 LP94 Mr. D. Yorke 236 LP95 Mr. D. Yorke 238

LP96 Mr. D. Yorke 240 LP97 Mr. D. Yorke 242 LP98 Mr. D. Yorke 244 LP99 Mr. D. Yorke 246 LP100 Mr. D. Yorke 248 LP101 Mr. D. Yorke 250 LP102 Mr. D. Yorke 252 LP103 Mr. D. Yorke 254 LP104 Mr. D. Yorke 256 LP105 Mr. D. Yorke 258 LP106 Mrs H Davies 260 LP107 Mr S Dunion 262 LP108 Mrs H Davies 264 LP109 Mr J Green 267 LP110 Mr P Hoptroff 269 LP111 Mr P Hoptroff 272 LP112 Mr R Dodman 275 LP113 Mr M Roberts 277 LP114 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 281 LP115 Mr J Snow 283 LP116 Mrs K Moore 286 LP117 Mr P Speed 288 LP118 Draycott in the Clay Parish Council (Mrs R Hill) 290 LP119 Mr W Stevenson 292 LP120 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 294 LP121 Network Rail (Mrs F Cunningham) 297 LP122 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 300 LP123 Mr A Redshaw 303 LP124 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 306 LP125 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 308 LP126 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 310 LP127 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 312 LP128 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 314 LP129 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 316 LP130 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 318 LP131 Mrs M Sanderson 320 LP132 Miss M Brandrick 323 LP133 Mr & Mrs Lawrence and Anne Witton 325 LP134 Mr A White 328 LP135 Mrs L Mills 331 LP136 Mr G Mills 333 LP137 The Theatres Trust (Ms R Freeman) 335 LP138 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 337 LP139 Mrs E Morgan 339 LP140 The Burton Property Trust 342 LP141 Outwoods Parish Council (Kay Lear) 345 LP142 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 348 LP143 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 350

LP144 The Burton Property Trust 353 LP145 Rolleston on Dove Parish Council (Mrs H Light) 355 LP146 Mr J Clarke 357 LP147 Natural England (Hayley Fleming) 360 LP148 Mr T Campbell 362 LP149 National Federation of Gypsy Liason Groups (Derbyshire

Gypsy Liason Group) (Mr A Yarwood) 365

LP150 Natural England (Hayley Fleming) 368 LP151 Branston Parish Council 370 LP152 Horninglow and Eton Parish Council 373 LP153 Natural England (Hayley Fleming) 376 LP154 Mr T Campbell 379 LP155 Natural England (Hayley Fleming) 382 LP156 Natural England (Hayley Fleming) 384 LP157 Natural England (Hayley Fleming) 386 LP158 Natural England (Hayley Fleming) 388 LP159 Natural England (Hayley Fleming) 390 LP160 Mrs O Neale 393 LP161 Mr T Campbell 395 LP162 The Mobile Operators Association (MOA) (The Mobile

Operators Association) 398

LP163 Mr T Campbell 401 LP164 Mrs J Tomlinson 404 LP165 Mr T Campbell 406 LP166 Mr T Campbell 409 LP167 Mr F Thompstone 411 LP168 Mr T Campbell 414 LP169 Mr T Campbell 416 LP170 Mr T Campbell 418 LP171 Mr T Campbell 420 LP172 Mr T Campbell 422 LP173 Mr T Campbell 424 LP174 Mr T Campbell 426 LP175 Mr T Campbell 428 LP176 Mr T Campbell 430 LP177 Providence Land Limited (Mr J Harbottle) 432 LP178 Providence Land Limited (Mr J Harbottle) 435 LP179 Providence Land Limited (Mr J Harbottle) 438 LP180 Providence Land Limited (Mr J Harbottle) 441 LP181 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 444 LP182 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 447 LP183 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 449 LP184 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 451 LP185 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 454 LP186 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 457 LP187 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 460 LP188 Mrs T Clay 463 LP189 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 466

LP190 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 469 LP191 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 472 LP192 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 475 LP193 Mr J Kirk 477 LP194 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 479 LP195 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 481 LP196 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 483 LP197 Mrs S Andrew 485 LP198 Mr D Mycock 487 LP199 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 491 LP200 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 493 LP201 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 495 LP202 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 498 LP203 Mr J Kirk 501 LP205 Mrs P Mellor 504 LP206 Mr R Green 507 LP207 Mrs S McCoy 510 LP208 Miss A Penniket 513 LP209 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 516 LP210 Anslow Business Park 519 LP211 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 523 LP212 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 525 LP213 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) 528 LP214 Tatenhill Parish Council (Mrs E Coleman) 531 LP215 West Midlands HARP Planning Consortium (Mr C Burton) 536 LP216 JMW Planning Ltd (Mr J Wren) for Mr T Campbell 538 LP217 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 541 LP218 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 544 LP219 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 547 LP220 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 550 LP221 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 553 LP222 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 556 LP223 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 559 LP224 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 562 LP225 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 565 LP226 Mr I Haywood 568 LP227 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 570 LP228 The National Forest Company (Mr P Metcalfe) 572 LP229 Mr S Stoney, Wardell Armstrong for BDW Trading Ltd 574 LP230 Anslow Parish Council 578 LP231 Anslow Parish Council 580 LP233 Anslow Parish Council 582 LP234 Anslow Parish Council 585 LP235 Mr D Burns 588 LP236 Mr D Burns 591 LP237 Mr D Burns 595 LP238 Mr D Burns 598 LP239 Mr D Burns 601

LP240 Hanbury Parish Council (Amanda Andrew) 604 LP241 Mr S Stoney, Wardell Armstrong for BDW Trading Ltd 606 LP242 William Davis Ltd (Mr R Jays) 609 LP243 William Davis Ltd (Mr R Jays) 612 LP244 William Davis Ltd (Mr R Jays) 615 LP245 William Davis Ltd (Mr R Jays) 618 LP246 William Davis Ltd (Mr R Jays) 621 LP247 William Davis Ltd (Mr R Jays) 624 LP248 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 627 LP249 William Davis Ltd (Mr R Jays) 629 LP250 Dr R Wickham, Howard Sharp and Partners for Providence

Land Ltd (Mr J Harbottle) 632

LP251 Mr S Stoney, Wardell Armstrong for BDW Trading Ltd 635 LP252 Dr D Staniforth 638 LP253 Lichfield District Council (Mr N Cox) 641 LP254 County Cllr S McKiernan (Stretton and Horninglow) 643 LP255 Mr M Thacker 646 LP256 Mr S Stoney, Wardell Armstrong for BDW Trading Ltd 649 LP257 Mrs S Walker 652 LP258 Mr S Stoney, Wardell Armstrong for BDW Trading Ltd 655 LP259 Mr G Stevenson, Barton Wilmore for St Modwen 658 LP260 Mr G Stevenson, Barton Wilmore for St Modwen 660 LP261 Mr G Stevenson, Barton Wilmore for St Modwen 662 LP263 Mr G Stevenson, Barton Wilmore for St Modwen 664 LP264 Mr G Stevenson, Barton Wilmore for St Modwen 666 LP265 Mr G Stevenson, Barton Wilmore for St Modwen 668 LP266 Mr A Mann 670 LP267 Mr N J Andrew 672 LP268 Sue Green, Home Builders Federation Ltd 674 LP269 Richard, June and Ken Bush 676 LP270 JLL for Nurton Developments Ltd 679 LP271 Mr W Nazir, Birmingham City Council 681 LP272 Mr C Leedham 684 LP273 Mrs H Carline 687 LP274 Mr S J Anderson 690 LP275 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 694 LP276 Freya Anderson 697 LP277 Freya Anderson 699 LP279 Freya Anderson 701 LP280 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 703 LP281 Freya Anderson 706 LP282 Freya Anderson 708 LP283 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 710 LP284 Freya Anderson 713 LP285 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 715 LP286 Freya Anderson 717 LP287 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 719 LP288 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 722

LP289 Mrs J Dean, Uttoxeter Labour Party 724 LP290 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 727 LP291 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 729 LP292 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 731 LP293 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 733 LP294 Mr T Tams 735 LP295 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 738 LP296 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 740 LP297 Mrs J Dean, Uttoxeter Labour Party 743 LP298 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 746 LP299 Mrs J Dean, Uttoxeter Labour Party 748 LP300 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 751 LP301 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 753 LP302 Mrs J Dean, Uttoxeter Labour Party 756 LP303 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 759 LP305 Mrs J Dean, Uttoxeter Labour Party 761 LP306 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 764 LP307 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 767 LP308 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 769 LP309 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 772 LP310 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 774 LP311 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 776 LP312 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 778 LP313 Tutbury Parish Council (Ms/Mr Powell) 781 LP314 Stubby Lane LLP 783 LP315 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 786 LP316 Branston Parish Council (Kay Lear) 789 LP317 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 791 LP318 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 794 LP319 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 797 LP320 Barry Davies, Davies & Co 800 LP321 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 802 LP322 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 805 LP323 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 808 LP324 Mr M Sackett, RPS for David Wilson Mercia 811 LP325 Mr S Anderson 814 LP326 Mr S Anderson 816 LP327 Mr S Anderson 818 LP328 Mrs M Taylor, Sport England 820 LP329 Mr S Anderson 823 LP330 Mr S Anderson 826 LP331 Mr S Anderson 829 LP332 Mrs M Taylor, Sport England 831 LP333 Mr S Anderson 833 LP334 Mrs M Taylor, Sport England 835 LP335 Mr S Anderson 837 LP336 Mr S Stoney, Wardell Armstrong for BDW Trading Ltd 840 LP337 Mrs M Taylor, Sport England 844

LP338 Mr S Anderson 847 LP339 Mrs M Taylor, Sport England 849 LP340 Mrs M Taylor, Sport England 852 LP341 Mrs M Taylor, Sport England 854 LP342 Mr S Anderson 857 LP343 Mr S Anderson 859 LP344 Mr S Anderson 861 LP345 Mrs M Taylor, Sport England 864 LP346 Angela Anderson 867 LP347 Angela Anderson 869 LP348 Angela Anderson 871 LP349 Angela Anderson 873 LP350 Angela Anderson 876 LP351 Angela Anderson 879 LP352 Angela Anderson 881 LP353 Angela Anderson 883 LP354 Angela Anderson 886 LP355 Angela Anderson 888 LP356 Angela Anderson 890 LP357 Angela Anderson 892 LP358 Mr N Grace, Savills for The Hall Trust (Statt, Hall and Smith) 895 LP359 Mr M Petrouis 897 LP360 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 899 LP361 Mr M Petrouis 902 LP362 Uttoxeter Town Council 904 LP363 Mr G Morgan, Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners for

Lightbrook 907

LP364 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 910 LP365 Mr G Morgan, Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners for

Lightbrook 912

LP366 Uttoxeter Town Council 915 LP367 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 917 LP368 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 919 LP369 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 923 LP370 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 926 LP371 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 929 LP372 Messers Critchley 932 LP373 Messers Critchley 934 LP374 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 936 LP375 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 938 LP376 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 941 LP377 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 944 LP378 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 947 LP379 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 950 LP380 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 953 LP381 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 956 LP382 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 959 LP383 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 962

LP384 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 965 LP385 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 967 LP386 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 970 LP387 Mrs J Hodson, JVH Town Planning Consultants 973 LP388 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 982 LP389 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 985 LP390 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 987 LP391 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 989 LP392 Mr A Whiteman 992 LP393 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 996 LP394 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 999 LP395 Mr A Whiteman 1002 LP396 Barton under Needwood Parish Council (Ms S Rumsby) 1006 LP397 Miss H Whitney, Nathaniel, Lichfield and Partners for

National Football Centre Ltd 1009

LP398 Miss H Whitney, Nathaniel, Lichfield and Partners for National Football Centre Ltd

1012

LP399 Miss H Whitney, Nathaniel, Lichfield and Partners for National Football Centre Ltd

1015

LP400 Mr & Mrs Smith 1018 LP401 Kathryn Young, Turley Associates for Bellway Homes Ltd 1021 LP402 Kathryn Young, Turley Associates for Bellway Homes Ltd 1023 LP403 Kathryn Young, Turley Associates for Bellway Homes Ltd 1025 LP404 Kathryn Young, Turley Associates for Bellway Homes Ltd 1027 LP405 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1030 LP406 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1033 LP407 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1036 LP408 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1039 LP409 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1041 LP410 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1043 LP411 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1045 LP412 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1047 LP413 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1049 LP414 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1051 LP415 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1053 LP416 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1055 LP417 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1058 LP418 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1061 LP419 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1064 LP420 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1067 LP421 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1070 LP422 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1072 LP423 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1074 LP424 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1076 LP425 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1078 LP426 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1080 LP427 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1082 LP428 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1084

LP429 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1087 LP430 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1090 LP431 Mr M Parkinson, Staffordshire County Council 1092 LP432 Barwood Strategic Land LLP & Mr and Mrs G Skipper 1095 LP433 Mr S Adams 1098 LP434 Mr S Adams 1100 LP435 Mrs J Hodson, JVH Town Planning Consultants for Bridge

Farm Partnership 1103

LP436 Mr S Adams 1112 LP437 Mr S Adams 1114 LP438 Mr G Mellor 1117 LP439 Mr S Adams 1119 LP440 Mr S Adams 1121 LP441 Mr S Adams 1123 LP442 Mr S Adams 1125 LP443 Mr S Adams 1127 LP444 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1129 LP445 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1131 LP446 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1133 LP447 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1135 LP448 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1137 LP449 Mrs J Hodson, JVH Town Planning Consultants for Marstons

PLC 1139

LP450 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1148 LP451 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1151 LP452 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1153 LP453 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1155 LP454 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1157 LP455 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1159 LP456 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1161 LP457 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1163 LP458 Mr D Burkey, Tesco Stores Ltd 1165 LP459 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1167 LP460 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1170 LP461 Mr C Barnes, Gladman Development 1173 LP462 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1176 LP463 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1179 LP464 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1182 LP465 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1185 LP466 Mrs J Hodson, JVH Town Planning Consultants for Mr B

Morgan 1188

LP467 Mr P Rouse, Savills for Duchy of Lancaster 1197 LP468 First City for Mr Breckons 1200 LP469 First City for Mr Breckons 1203 LP470 Mr G Anderson, Addleshaw Goddard LLP for Mr M

Hargreaves, JC Bamford Excavators Ltd 1206

LP471 Mr G Anderson, Addleshaw Goddard LLP for Mr M Hargreaves, JC Bamford Excavators Ltd

1209

LP472 Mr B Davies, Davies & Co for Mr and Mrs T, I & J Robinson, Mr & Mrs Hill and Mrs Newstead

1212

LP473 Mrs J Hodson, JVH Town Planning Consultants for Mrs L Mousley

1215

LP474 Cllr Mrs J Jessel and Cllr Mrs J Jones 1224 LP475 Mrs J Hodson, JVH Town Planning Consultants for Walton

Homes Ltd 1226

LP476 Mrs J Hodson, JVH Town Planning Consultants for A and S Enterprises Ltd

1235

LP477 Mrs J Hodson, JVH Town Planning Consultants for Mr C Davis

1244

LP478 Mrs J Hodson, JVH Town Planning Consultants for MJ Barrett Developments Ltd

1253

LP479 Mr R Crow, Barton Willmore for Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd 1262 LP480 Mr G Willard for Uttoxeter Landowner 1267 LP481 Mr S Louth, Turley Associates for Mr J Collins, Hallam Land

Management and Co 1269

LP482 Mr S Louth, Turley Associates for Mr J Collins, Hallam Land Management and Co

1272

LP483 Mr S Louth, Turley Associates for Mr J Collins, Hallam Land Management and Co

1274

LP484 Miss S Victor, Environment Agency 1277 LP485 Miss S Victor, Environment Agency 1279 LP486 Miss S Victor, Environment Agency 1281 LP487 Miss S Victor, Environment Agency 1283 LP488 Miss S Victor, Environment Agency 1285 LP489 Miss S Victor, Environment Agency 1287 LP490 Mr A Gibson, Picknall Valley Preservation Group 1289 LP491 Mr A Gibson, Picknall Valley Preservation Group 1292 LP492 Mr A Gibson, Picknall Valley Preservation Group 1295 LP493 Mr A Gibson, Picknall Valley Preservation Group 1298 LP494 Mr A Gibson, Picknall Valley Preservation Group 1301 LP495 Mr D Shipley, Residents of Stubby Lane, Draycott in the

Clay 1304

LP500 Mr A Gibson, Picknall Valley Preservation Group 1307 LP501 Mr J Anderson, Friends of Outwoods 1310 LP502 Turley Associates for Bellway Homes 1313 LP503 Knight Frank for Mr J Shaw, Molson Coors Brewing

Company 1315

LP504 Knight Frank for Mr J Shaw, Molson Coors Brewing Company

1318


1321


1324


1327


1330


1333


1337


1339

Comments.

Pre-Submission Local Plan (18/10/13 to 29/11/13)

Mr Keith SunleyComment by

LP1Comment ID

20/10/13 12:45Response Date

Pre-Submission Local Plan 2013 ( View )Consultation Point

ProcessedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.2Version

To which part of the Local Plan does thisrepresentation relate?

Policy

7Which paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?

For the Local Plan to be legally compliant it has to be prepared in accordance with the Duty to Cooperateand the following legal and procedural requirements:

1 Consultation has been carried out in accordance with the Council's Statement of Community Involvement(SCI)

2 The Local Plan is identified in the current Local Development Scheme (LDS) and the key stages havebeen followed.

3 The Council has fulfilled its Duty to Cooperate with other Local Planning Authorities, County Councilsand other bodies with Statutory Functions.

4 The Local Plan complies with the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended).5 The Local Plan complies with the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) (Amendment)

Regulations 2012.6 An adequate Sustainability Appraisal report (SA) is published to accompany the Plan.

YesDo you think the Pre-Submission Local Plan isLegally Compliant?

NoDo you think the Pre-Submission Local Plan isSound?

Test of soundness - definitionsa. Positively Prepared: The Plan should be prepared based on a strategywhich seeks to meet objectively assessed development and infrastructure requirements.

b. Justified: The Plan should be the most appropriate strategy, when considered against the reasonablealternatives, based on proportionate evidence.

c. Effective: the Plan should be deliverable over its plan period and based on effective joint working oncross-boundary strategic priorities.

This means that the Plan should demonstrate:

Powered by Objective Online 4.2 - page 1

1

http://eaststaffsbc-consult.limehouse.co.uk/portal/local_plan/lp_pre-submission?pointId=1382018087541#1382018087541

1 Sound infrastructure delivery planning2 Having no regulatory or national planning barriers to delivery3 Delivery partners who are signed up to it4 Coherence with the strategies of neighbouring authoritiesd. Consistent with National Policy: The Plan should enable the delivery of sustainable development inaccordance with the policies in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

The Local Plan pays due regard to all the policies of the National Planning Policy Framework and refers tothese as appropriate throughout the Plan. However, you may take the view that the Local Plan fails to addressa requirement of the NPPF. In this case you should explain what else it needs to include. Please note thatthe Local Plan does not need to repeat national policies.You could take a view that the Plan should departfrom national planning policies for good local reasons. In this case you need to explain what these localreasons are.

If no, please select which test(s) of soundness byticking the relevant boxes below and providefurther details below

a. Positively preparedb. Justifiedc. Effective

1. Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound.Please be as precise as possible. Alternatively, if you wish to support the legal compliance ofsoundness of the Local Plan, please also use this box to set out your comments

a. Positively Prepared

The Uttoxeter Settlement Boundary Extension to include Hazelwalls Farm would allow the StrategicOption 2 to be adopted when this was rejected in favour of Option 1(west Uttoxeter) in the previousconsultation.This was rejected for poor infrastrure reasons ie. furthest from shops, schools and leisurefacilities, creates a rat run parallel to Stafford Rd., difficult to include in an existing bus route and accessis funnelled through an existing housing estate.

b. Justified.

Option 1 in the Strategic Plan was adopted to meet the stated housing and employment needs ofUttoxeter.The extension of the Settlement Boundary to include an extra 450 houses on the HazelwallsFarm green field site is not needed within the time scale of the plan.

c. Effective.

This extension to the Settlement Boundary has been added to accomodate Mosaic Estates plans fora housing estate on Hazelwalls Farm. The local plan should be biased towards the needs of the Townand local people, not a Developer.

5. Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Local Plan legally compliantor sound, having regard to the test you have identified above where this relates to soundness.Youwill need to say why this change will make the Local Plan legally compliant or sound. It will be helpfulif you are able to put forward your suggested revised wording of any policy or text. Please be asprecise as possible.

The changes to be made are ; remove the Settlement Boundary extension to the south of Uttoxeteron the Hazelwalls Farm site and the many references to it in the text.

The reasons for this are stated above on how it fails the soundness tests.

After this stage, further submissions will be only at the request of the planning inspector, based onthe matters and issues he/she identifies at the examination.

If your representation is seeking change, do youconsider it necessary to speak at the examinationin public?

a. No, I do not wish to participate in theexamination


2

If you wish to be contacted at different stages ofthe plan process please tick the boxes:

SubmissionInspectors ReportAdoption


3

Comments.


Revd George CrossleyComment by

LP2Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.2Version


PolicyPolicies Map

allWhich paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?








YesDo you think the Pre-Submission Local Plan isSound?






4





d. Consistent with National Policy






5

Comments.


MR ROBERT DODMANComment by

LP4Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.2Version


Policy

homes in the open countrysideWhich paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?














6





c. Effectived. Consistent with National Policy







7

Comments.


I ShiptonComment by

LP5Comment ID


Pre-Submission Local Plan ( View )Consultation Point

ProcessedStatus

EmailSubmission Type

0.4Version


Policies Map

Policies MapWhich paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?







NoDo you think the Pre-Submission Local Plan isLegally Compliant?


Test of soundness - definitions a. Positively Prepared : The Plan should be prepared based on a strategywhich seeks to meet objectively assessed development and infrastructure requirements.

b. Justified : The Plan should be the most appropriate strategy, when considered against the reasonablealternatives, based on proportionate evidence.

c. Effective : the Plan should be deliverable over its plan period and based on effective joint working oncross-boundary strategic priorities.



8

http://eaststaffsbc-consult.limehouse.co.uk/portal/local_plan/lp_pre-submission?pointId=point20635#point20635

1 Sound infrastructure delivery planning2 Having no regulatory or national planning barriers to delivery3 Delivery partners who are signed up to it4 Coherence with the strategies of neighbouring authoritiesd. Consistent with National Policy : The Plan should enable the delivery of sustainable development inaccordance with the policies in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).



a. Positively preparedd. Consistent with National Policy


My clients have concerns as to the legal compliance and soundness of the land allocations at Outwoodson the western fringe of Burton-on-Trent. Statute indicates that it is the purpose of core strategies toestablish strategic options and preferred options for future development. Strategic options are thosegeneral areas of development which will meet the identified housing demand and can be site or areaspecific.

The boundary of the allocated land at Outwoods does not represent a strategic allocation but it followsthe line of land ownership/control relating to an actual planning allocation. Specific land ownershipshould not impact upon the consideration of a development strategy providing all the land identifiedwithin a strategic development area or allocated area has been assessed and has been found to beavailable for development.

Consequently the adoption of an irregular area of land as a strategic development area which followsa particular ownership boundary will result in an odd shaped area difficult to develop to maximumefficiency and incorporating undeveloped land intruding into the primary development area withassociated risks of adverse amenity and interaction.

The allocated area at Outwoods should therefore be modified as to incorporate the consented landbut also in such a way as to provide a regularly shaped and more easily developed strategic housingdevelopment area.


The area identified for development at Outwoods should have an amended site boundary which shouldextend all the way west to Outwoods Lane and all the way south to Field Lane so as to capture allland which is situated to the north of Field Lane and the east of Outwoods Lane.

This amendment would then reflect a strategic housing allocation rather than an artificially drawnallocation following an irregular pattern of land ownership boundaries.



9






10

Comments.


Mr Anthony R BarringtonComment by

LP6Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

LetterSubmission Type

0.5Version


Policies Map

Map 3 - UttoxeterWhich paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?














11

http://eaststaffsbc-consult.limehouse.co.uk/portal/local_plan/lp_pre-submission?pointId=point20635#point20635




b. Justifiedc. Effectived. Consistent with National Policy


The amount of extra, mainly car, traffic will cause extreme problems for both existing parties and forthe near residents. Many children from 'Westlands' area regularly walk to school. This will becomedangerous given the already heavy traffic on the Stafford / Old Knotty Way juction. The existing roadsare too narrow to allow buses to traverse the area.


Abandon the plan for this area as unsuitable for large increase in residential property.







12

Comments.


Mr and Mrs William and Yvonne CossarComment by

LP7Comment ID



ProcessedStatus


0.3Version


Policy









a. Positively preparedb. Justified


13



I don't believe that the plan has been assessed soundly with reference to the problems already existingwith the infrastructure of Marchington village. Flooding has been a problem in Marchington for manyyears and try as we do we can't cure this at present what will happen when we cover greenfield siteson Jacks Lane with concrete and tarmac, add to the problem?


I don't consider the proposed development at Yew Tree Farm a problem, in fact I think it would enhancethe village. But if more houses are required why not build them on the brownfield site on the disusedliving accomodation on the old army site.






14

Comments.


Mr Charles CroweComment by

LP8Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.3Version


Policies Map

Proposed settlement boundary extension 10Which paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?









15





I consider the pre-submission plan unsound as it applies to the village of Marchington and in particularthe extension of the settlement boundary in Jacks Lane as indicated on Inset Map 10.

Flooding

I live at the top of Woodland Views. Over the past few years it has been impossible on many occasionsto enter Jacks Lane owing to flooding. The flooding is caused after heavy rain has fallen on sloping fieldsat the sides of Jacks Lane and the water has flowed down from the fields into the lane. Attempts toease the flooding problem in the village has recently been made by the appropriate authorities but weare advised that the problem in Jacks Lane cannot be rectified without major development of thesurface water drainage infastructure. House building in this location will make things worse withoutsubstantial costly drainage improvement work .

Traffic

Jacks Lane is the main route through the village and subject to intense traffic flow by both heavy andlight vehicles. There are no pavements on either side of the lane. Use of the lane by pedestrians isalready hazardous. Further development along this lane will increase traffic and make access into thelane from existing and any new properties dangerous. If pavements are established and the lanewidened in this section it will be out of keeping with the rest of the road system in the village.

Green Field Site The extension is onto a green field site currently used for grazing animals. This issurely unsatisfactory in a village location where much of the village is in a Conservation Area.


The extension to the settlement boundary in Jacks Lane should be omitted from thePre-Submission plan.





Inspectors Report


16

Comments.


Mr Ian Laurence BrownComment by

LP9Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.3Version


Policies Map

inset no. 10: MarchingtonWhich paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?









17



b. Justified


I consider that the local plan is unsound, in that the proposal to increase the settlement boundary onJacks Lane and at Yew Tree Farm, to accomodate 20 new houses, does not take into account theprobable adverse environmental consequences to the lower sectors of the village, in particular tohousing on or adjacent to Church Lane. This area is liable to flooding due to...

1.overflowing of Marchington Brook at or below the Church Lane bridge, frequently exacerbated byrapid drainage of surface water from roads and houses situated on the elevated areas to the west ofthe brook, including Jacks Lane & Yew Tree farm.

2. the fact that the existing sewers and surface drains are already unable to cope with the volumes ofwater resulting from relatively moderate rainfall at periods when the ground is already saturated.

Flooding has actually occurred four times on Church Lane since June 2012, with foul water enteringhouses adjacent to the church on two occasions

Evidence of the causes of this flooding has already been provided by Severn Trent Water, whosurveyed the village during 2012/2013 and have reported to residents that the sewers/drains areinadequate to cope with existing water/effluent. The Environment Agency are involved and are ingeneral agreement with the above findings. They are currently carrying out a detailed survey of thevillage and its environs, and should be reporting shortly. We can also produce letters from variousinterested parties, including copies of letters to village residents from ESBC, which clearly state thatno more building should be permitted in the village due to the lack of drainage/sewerage capacity. Noenlargement or improvements have been made to the systems since those letters were written.

It is our contention that the proposed boundary increases / new building would increase the risk offlooding, and the severity of any such flooding, in the areas discussed above, which would causeincreased hardship and distress to existing residents. Any additional building/paving/hardstanding inthe proposed areas must accelerate discharge of surface water to the brook, and obviously thesewerage discharge from 20 new dwellings cannot be accomodated by existing sewers. It wouldappear that the consultation process prior to the formulation of the local plan failed to highlight theseproblems, so I contend that the current proposals for Marchington are seriously flawed.


In the light of the evidence presented above, I strongly recommend that the new houses which ESBCsay must be built in Marchington, should and could be accommodated in other areas of theParish, where they would result in little or no environmental impact.







18

Comments.


MR Stuart MillerComment by

LP10Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.2Version


PolicyPolicies Map

Proposed settlement boundary extension10Marchington

Which paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?







NoDo you think the Pre-Submission Local Plan isLegally Compliant?







19







I consider that the pre-submission plan unsound as it applies to the village of Marchington. This isespecially in regard to the proposed extension of the settlement boundary in Jacks Lane and YewTree Farm as indicated on Inset Map 10.

Legal Compliance

I consider that East Staffordshire Borough Council have tried to make the process of objecting orapproving the pre-submission Plan as difficult as possible without due consideration of residents. Thepurpose of East Staffordshire Borough Council is to look after the interests of residents NOT to try tomake it nearly impossible for an individual to make representation.

I therefore contend that the Pre-Submission Local Plan is not Legally Compliant and should be rejected.

Essential ServicesThe existing water, gas,electricity and drainage are inadequate for existing needs. Any increaser in such proposed development would put an even greater strain on such services andresult in unacceptable problems for residents.

In particular, the flooding in Jacks Lane has become un acceptable and nothing has been done toalleiviate the problem. To build further houses would result in untold damage to the existing frameworkand buildings. I live in Jacks Lane and during the past few years the flooiding has been so bad that ithas not been possible sometimes to negotiate the flooding or gain access to Woodland Views, withoutcausing damage to the infrastructure and property. I understand that the various authorities haveadvised that the flooding problem in Jacks Lane cannot be rectified without major development of thesurface water drainage infrastructure. Any increase in house building will make the situation worsewithout substantial costly drainage improvement work.

The fact that the existing culverts and sewers are already unable to cope with the volumes of waterresulting from relatively moderate rainfall at times when the ground is already totally saturated, is 100%evidence that such proposed Pre-Submission Plan has been totally incorrectly considered. I contendthat East Staffordshire Bourough Council has ignored all the current problems that are causing theflooding and pressure on existing services and traffic problems in the village.

Roads and TrafficJacks Lane, Marchington is the main route into the village of Marchington by bothcars and heavy vehicles. The road just cannot sustain the additional proposed build of more houses,which would cause substantial traffic problems. Already, cars, wagons and agricultural vehicles goalong Jacks Lane at an unacceptable speed and more housing would increase both the dangers ofexiting onto the road and increase the possibility of accidents. The road in Jacks Lane and Yew TreeFarm are both insufficient to accommadate additional vehicles, which would be the result of additionalhousing being built at both the proposed areas in the village. The road structure is insufficient to caterfor additional traffic. The proposed building would make access to and from Jacks Lane dangerouisefor both existing, new and other traffic.


20

The sites submitted in the Pre-Submission Plan are on Green Field sites and as they are close to theConservation Area would be unsatisfactory in a village location. Conclusion It appears that EastStaffordshire Borough Council have totally ignored the existing problems or considered the effect onthe environment and local area. In view of the above, I contend that the proposed sites should beexcluded and removed from the Pre-Submission Plan.


Taking into account the evidence shown above, I propose that the settlement boundaries in JacksLane and Yew Tree Farm should be excluded and omitted from the Pre-Submission Plan.







21

Comments.


Mr Bryan ChinnComment by

LP11Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

EmailSubmission Type

0.4Version


Policy

4Which paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?









22



b. Justified


1. The Local Plan pre - submission document has more than a few examples of inconsistent andincorrect data, which together with assumptions made, could be interpretated as an indication ofinsufficient preparatory work.

2. It is regrettable that it appears that the document has not been proof read - therefore it could becommented that the plan has been constructed from an amount of unsubstantiated data.

There are many errors in the text, a typical example is the statement on page 28 which shows anincorrect location of The National Brewery Centre. Such obvious errors do not inspire confidence inthe accuracy of the document in other respects, in fact to report conclusions without reference tosource of information can lead to suspicions that the document may lack authenticity.

3. It is relevant that Rolleston on Dove Parish Council has challenged the Settlement heirarchy whichdefines their future as a "Strategic Village" but it is significant that no thorough investigation was madeto obtain data for this decision - in fact questions have elicited the response that as an employee ofESBC lived in the village information was gathered via that employee

It is therefore open to question that as the score is defined by facilities, and there is apparently noevidence of questions having been asked of the operators or owners of the facilities, then the scoringcannot be accurate. There surely should have been a more accurate survey and if the Parish Councilhad been involved accurate data could have been provided.

4. It is noted that "College Field" is indicated as a development site at Rolleston. This site's planningapplication has twice been deferred, and the NDP for Rolleston does not include this site, so theproposal shows no recognition of the NDP. - it is a matter of concern that ESBC has not participatedin this NDP.

5. I request that this letter be considered as a response to the Consultation, and in particular thatcomments about Rolleston on Dove's place in the settlement heirarchy should be carefully reconsidered,as there is evidence that there is insufficient data to support the decision.





23

Comments.


Mrs Margaret BetsonComment by

LP12Comment ID



ProcessedStatus


0.4Version

Mrs M Betson response (2).pdfFilesMrs M Betson response.pdf


Policies Map

Inset Map 3Which paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?









24

http://eaststaffsbc-consult.limehouse.co.uk/portal/local_plan/lp_pre-submission?pointId=point20635#point20635/file/2702077/file/2702064

Comments.


Mr ROBERT DODMANComment by

LP13Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.5Version


Policy

housing in Tier 3 settlementsWhich paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?














25





a. Positively preparedb. Justifiedc. Effectived. Consistent with National Policy


For Tier 3 settlements are 3 houses acceptable as affordable housung

For Tier 3 settlements are 4 ecofriendly/sustainable homes as self builds acceptable.







26

Comments.


Mr ROBERT DODMANComment by

LP14Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.3Version


Policy













1 Sound infrastructure delivery planning2 Having no regulatory or national planning barriers to delivery3 Delivery partners who are signed up to it


27


4 Coherence with the strategies of neighbouring authoritiesd. Consistent with National Policy: The Plan should enable the delivery of sustainable development inaccordance with the policies in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).



a. Positively preparedb. Justifiedc. Effectived. Consistent with National Policy


I believe the Local Plan is Positively prepared, Justified, Effective and Consistent with National Policyand if implimented in accordance with the aims set out will go some way to relieve the chronic housingshortage and give ordinary people more choice of where they want to live.







28

Comments.


mrs Ann Wynniatt-HuseyComment by

LP15Comment ID



ProcessedStatus

WebSubmission Type

0.3Version


Policies Map

10 MarchingtonWhich paragraph number, policy number orpolicies map does your comment relate to?














29


Documents

A.2 Index for Representations received under Regulation 20 · LP17 Cllr Julian Mott 33 LP18 Mr P Sharpe, Inland Waterways Association 35 LP19 Ms Sharon Farnell, Rocester Parish Council