92
The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute Northwestern Memorial Hospital Patrick M. McCarthy MD, FACC Executive Director of the Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute Chief of Cardiac Surgery Division Heller - Sacks Professor of Surgery in the Feinberg School of Medicine Thursday, October 5, 2017 2017 Heart Valve Summit Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation Chicago, IL Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to Monitor Maze Success

Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Patrick M McCarthy MD FACCExecutive Director of the Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Chief of Cardiac Surgery DivisionHeller-Sacks Professor of Surgery in the Feinberg School of Medicine

Thursday October 5 20172017 Heart Valve Summit

Session VI Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral RegurgitationChicago IL

Ablation Strategy Appendage Managementand How to Monitor Maze Success

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Disclosures

bull None

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17

bull Latest Guidelinesbull Why Whatrsquos the Evidencebull How Lesion sets Technologies LAAbull Outcomes How to Measure them

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed without additional risk of operative mortality or major morbidity and is recommended at the time of concomitant mitral operations to restore sinus rhythm (Class I Level A)

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103-329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why Such Strong Guidelines

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p =00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

Contemporary utilization of SA is increasing across all operative categories Performance of SA is accompanied by a 30-day reductionin mortality and stroke These findings further refine our understanding of the role of SA in the treatment of AF Ann Thorac Surg 2017104493-500

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 2: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Disclosures

bull None

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17

bull Latest Guidelinesbull Why Whatrsquos the Evidencebull How Lesion sets Technologies LAAbull Outcomes How to Measure them

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed without additional risk of operative mortality or major morbidity and is recommended at the time of concomitant mitral operations to restore sinus rhythm (Class I Level A)

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103-329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why Such Strong Guidelines

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p =00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

Contemporary utilization of SA is increasing across all operative categories Performance of SA is accompanied by a 30-day reductionin mortality and stroke These findings further refine our understanding of the role of SA in the treatment of AF Ann Thorac Surg 2017104493-500

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 3: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17

bull Latest Guidelinesbull Why Whatrsquos the Evidencebull How Lesion sets Technologies LAAbull Outcomes How to Measure them

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed without additional risk of operative mortality or major morbidity and is recommended at the time of concomitant mitral operations to restore sinus rhythm (Class I Level A)

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103-329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why Such Strong Guidelines

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p =00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

Contemporary utilization of SA is increasing across all operative categories Performance of SA is accompanied by a 30-day reductionin mortality and stroke These findings further refine our understanding of the role of SA in the treatment of AF Ann Thorac Surg 2017104493-500

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 4: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed without additional risk of operative mortality or major morbidity and is recommended at the time of concomitant mitral operations to restore sinus rhythm (Class I Level A)

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103-329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why Such Strong Guidelines

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p =00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

Contemporary utilization of SA is increasing across all operative categories Performance of SA is accompanied by a 30-day reductionin mortality and stroke These findings further refine our understanding of the role of SA in the treatment of AF Ann Thorac Surg 2017104493-500

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 5: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why Such Strong Guidelines

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p =00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

Contemporary utilization of SA is increasing across all operative categories Performance of SA is accompanied by a 30-day reductionin mortality and stroke These findings further refine our understanding of the role of SA in the treatment of AF Ann Thorac Surg 2017104493-500

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 6: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why Such Strong Guidelines

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p =00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

Contemporary utilization of SA is increasing across all operative categories Performance of SA is accompanied by a 30-day reductionin mortality and stroke These findings further refine our understanding of the role of SA in the treatment of AF Ann Thorac Surg 2017104493-500

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 7: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why Such Strong Guidelines

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p =00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

Contemporary utilization of SA is increasing across all operative categories Performance of SA is accompanied by a 30-day reductionin mortality and stroke These findings further refine our understanding of the role of SA in the treatment of AF Ann Thorac Surg 2017104493-500

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 8: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p =00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

Contemporary utilization of SA is increasing across all operative categories Performance of SA is accompanied by a 30-day reductionin mortality and stroke These findings further refine our understanding of the role of SA in the treatment of AF Ann Thorac Surg 2017104493-500

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 9: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

Contemporary utilization of SA is increasing across all operative categories Performance of SA is accompanied by a 30-day reductionin mortality and stroke These findings further refine our understanding of the role of SA in the treatment of AF Ann Thorac Surg 2017104493-500

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 10: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF

3797 3263 2724 2208 1748 1303423 365 313 250 206 131129 99 73 62 47 28

bullPlt 0001

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 11: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PS MatchedSurvival

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 12: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Does AF Treatment Change the Curve

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 13: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Maze Surgery is Complicated

Can It Be Effective and Efficient

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 14: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery

Trials YearNumber of Pts Technology

Control 12 Month

NSR

Treated 12 Month

NSRDeneke et al 2002

30 Unipolar Cooled RF

267 80 (p lt 001)

Schuetz et al 2003

43 Microwave 333 80 (p = 0036)

Akpinar et al 2003

67 Unipolar RF 94 936 (p = 00001)

Abreu Filho et al 2005

70 Unipolar Cooled RF

269 794 (p = 0001)

Doukas et al 2005

101 Unipolar RF 45 444 (p = 0001)

Blomstroumlm-Lunqvist 2007

69 Cryoablation 429 733(p=0013)

Chevalier2009

43 Unipolar RF 4 57 (p=0004)

Gillinov2015

260 Radiofrequency and cryo

294 632 (plt0001)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 15: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 16: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cox Maze Procedure

bull Pulmonary Vein ldquoBoxrdquo Lesionbull MV Annulus to Box Lesionbull SVC-IVCbull TV Annulus flutter

lines X2bull Excision of LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 17: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 18: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

MV Annulus Lesion

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 19: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 20: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017Jun103(6)1858-1865

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 21: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 22: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 23: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 24: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 25: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What About the Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 26: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The atrial appendage is the source of stroke in 91 of non-rheumatic AF and 57 in rheumatic AF

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 27: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20161521075-80

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 28: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 45 (2014) 126ndash131

40 patients serial CT imaging over 3 year follow-up

CONCLUSION This is the first prospective trial in which concomitant epicardial LAA occlusion using this novel epicardial LAA clip device is 100 effective safe and durable in the long term Closure of the LAA by epicardialclipping is applicable to all-comers regardless of LAA morphology Minimal access epicardial LAA clip closure may become an interesting therapeutic option for patients in AF who are not amenable to anticoagulation andor catheter closure Further data are necessary to establish LAA occlusion as a true and viable therapy for stroke prevention

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 29: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics

ldquo 3 month blanking period hellipfreedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the

efficacy of AF ablationhelliprdquoHeart Rhythm 201710 in press

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 30: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitoring

ECG Thatrsquos Not EnoughHolter Most Common

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 31: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

PPM Most Accurate

Surgery

Cardioversion

Procedure Failure35 seconds of AF after 90 days

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 32: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions

bull Not Only Safe it May Reduce Peri-op Riskbull Effectivebull Surgery Can Be Efficient even with LA Only

Lesions (RA Ablation is Easy if Needed)bull 97 Use with MV bull Close or Excise Appendage

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 33: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 34: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery

bull Set Pre-op Expectations Early AF recurrence is NOT a failure

bull Meds Monitoring (ppm holter or zio) Frequency Intervention (CV or CA)

bull ldquoAF nurserdquo printed materials for patient AND the referring cardiologist

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 35: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelinesbull Phase I DC to 3 months (Blanking Period)

- Suppressive AAD and anticoagulation - Monitor for symptomatic arrhythmia and DCCV if

needed- Phone follow-up with patient by AF nurse

bull Phase II 3-6 months (Cards EP You)- HampP ECG extended cardiac monitoring- Consideration of discontinuing AAD at 3 months- Consideration of stopping anticoagulation

(CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc)- Phone follow-up by AF nurse

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 36: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Peri-op Meds

bull Amiodarone 90 at DC bull Second Choice The Prior AA bull Beta blocker rate control

bull 30 arenrsquot on these due to bradycardiaheart block

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 37: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016151798-803

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 38: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ

bullWater resistantbull14 days continuous recordingbullPhone app to log symptomsbullReceivereturn via mail

bullImplanted by injectionbull3 year batterybullRemote download of data

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 39: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC

Whatrsquos the Stroke Risk

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 40: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

CHA2DS2-VASc

Am J Medicine 2012125(6) 603

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 41: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

In press Ann Thorac Surg 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 42: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke

At last follow-up 496935 patients (53) off Coumadin

Stroke rate 08year in AF Ablation MV surgery patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 43: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 2017103329-41

After SA for AF full anticoagulation therapy is common and reasonable until durable rhythm restoration is established provided the patient otherwise meets criteria for the safe administration of systemic anticoagulant agents Anticoagulation therapy is commonly continued until a stable sinus rhythm is documented by at least a 24-hour Holtermonitor off all antiarrhythmic drugs often between 2 and 6 months postoperatively It is also common practice to obtain an echocardiogram before discontinuing anticoagulation to ensure adequate LA emptying by the absence of spontaneous LA echocardiography contrast

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 44: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

bull Phase III 1-2 years- At 6 months post-procedure and every 6 months for 2

years patients should have an ECG and a minimum of a Holter monitor

- Phone follow-up with AF nursebull Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Arrhythmia

- Patient activated cardiac event monitor- Referral for DCCV or catheter ablation if AFAFL

bull Patients with Implanted Cardiac Devices- Pacemaker defibrillator implanted cardiac monitor- Program to detect and store AHR to substitute external

monitoring

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 45: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Post AF Surgery Guidelines

1 month 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months 24 months

H amp P

ECG

Medication review

Antiarrhythmic STOP

Anticoagulation STOP

Extended Monitoring

Cardioversion 6-8 weeks

Catheter Ablation Consider

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 46: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Other

Left atrial

Biatrial

CM III

PVI

n=597 n=392

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 47: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mitral Surgery All Others

PAF

Persistent

LSP

bull47

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 48: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16

574 MV patients

405 (71) no intervention 169 (29) intervention

SR Fail CV CA Both303 (53) 102 (18) 119 20 30

SR114 (67)

73 success 20 ldquosalvagerdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 49: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summarybull AF in the early post-operative period does not

mean failurebull Cardioversion or referral to EP for ablation

can increase the success of procedurebull Monitoring is critical

- Prior symptoms may no longer exist- ldquoRegular pulserdquo may be controlled flutter

bull49

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 50: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

bull Repeated CV after 6 months not usually useful- Consider referral to EP for ablation- Consider re-initiation of suitable AAD

bull Some patients who fail AF surgery are not appropriate to send for intervention- Stop the AAD they were discharged on- Evaluate appropriate anticoagulation

bull50

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 51: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 52: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

How do you make it happen

bull Develop care guidelines with all players- Cardiology electrophysiology cardiac surgery

and patient- Based on the Expert Consensus Statement

bull Communicate the planbull Follow-up to keep the plan on track

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 53: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoThis important manuscript considers many of the factors that are important in the decision making process for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation A clear treatment algorithm is offered which can help surgeons increase their success to the obvious potential benefit for patients ldquo

Patrick M McCarthy et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr 01 2010 139 860-867

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 54: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set

bull Strong proponents of Cox Maze IV Biatriallesions1 2

bull Data Indicating Equal Efficacy of BA vs LA lesions 3 4

bull Increased Risk with Biatrial vs Left Atrial Only 45

1 Henn MC Lancaster TS Miller JR Sinn LA Schuessler RB Moon MR et al Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5) 1168-78

2 Ad N Henry L Massimiano P Pritchard G Holmes SD The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease Current opinion in cardiology 201328(2)170-80

3 Gillinov AM Gelijns AC Parides MK DeRose JJ Jr Moskowitz AJ Voisine P et al Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery N Engl J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

4 Phan K Xie A Tsai YC Kumar N La Meir M Yan TD Biatrial ablation vs left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis Europace European pacing arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing arrhythmiasand cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 201517(1)38-47

5 Soni LK Cedola SR Cogan J Jiang J Yang J Takayama H et al Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation but they do increase procedural morbidity The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2013145(2)356-61

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 55: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for

Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies

And the Approach in ldquoSimplerdquo Patients Isnrsquot All That Clear

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 56: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

J Am Coll Cardiol 201769303-21

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 57: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF

bull Volume Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Pressure Overload Corrected by Surgerybull Atrial Fibrosismyopathyhypertrophy

Anatomically Scattered not at PVLA junctionbull Lessons from Basic Science and Lone AF

Patients are of Limited Use or Irrelevant

bull5

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 58: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

N Engl J Med 20153721399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 59: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Treating The Mitral Treats the AF

Adding Left Atrial Lesions (location of the Pathologic Change) Increases Success

For MR patients Do RA lesions Add Even More

Is There a Price for BA Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 60: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2017

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 61: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

2137 Mitral Surgery

838 (39) AF pre-op

724 (86) ablation

616 (79) BA or LA lesion sets with cryo andor bipolar RF available for analysis

359 (58) LA lesion

set

257 (42)BA lesion

set

Lesion set was at discretion of surgeon based on patient characteristics

MethodsNMH 4-rsquo04 thru 6-rsquo14

Mitral surgery +- other

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 62: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of Original Groups Variable Left Only

(N=359) Biatrial(N=257)

P-value

Age years 68 + 11 69 + 11 029

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 610) 550 (450 600) 0027

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1230 (970 1540) 1310 (1100 1560) 001

Repeat Sternotomy 86 (24) 63 (25) 087

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 92(26) 158(61) lt001

Mitral Valve repair 218 (61) 145 (56) 028

Mitral Valve Replacement 141 (39) 112( 44) 028

Mechanical valve 10 (7) 4 (4 ) 028

AF duration years 10 (05 50) 40 (10 105) lt001

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 46 (41 52) 48 (42 53) 0039

Paroxysmal AF 223(62) 86(33) lt001

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 90) 80 (60 100) 0022

30-Day Mortality No () 7 (2) 7 (3) 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 63: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups Variable Left Only

(N=147) Biatrial(N=147)

P-value

Age years 68 + 12 69 + 12 081

Ejection Fraction Median (Q1 Q3) 550 (500 600) 550 (450 600) 075

Cardiopulmonary Bypass time (min) median (Q1 Q3) 1340 (1100 1620) 1320 (1100 1600) 083

Repeat Sternotomy 38 (26) 36 (24) 079

Tricuspid Valve Surgery No () 67(46) 69(47) 082

Mitral Valve repair 82 (56) 82 (56) 100

Mitral Valve Replacement 65 (44) 65( 44) 100

Mechanical valve 6 (9) 4 (6 ) 074

AF duration years 20 (05 90) 30 (10 80) 023

Left Atrial Size Median (Q1 Q3) 49 (43 54) 47 (42 52) 012

Paroxysmal AF 62(42) 63(43) 078

Post-Operative Length of Stay (Days) Median (Q1 Q3) 70 (60 100) 70 (50 100) 082

30-Day Mortality No () 4 (3) 4 (3) 100

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 64: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Propensity matched groups

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=010

LA BA

70 89127

7998124

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=09

LA BA

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PPM p=057

LA BA 0

002

004

006

008

Annualized Stroke rate per 10 personyear p=100

LA BA

6982119

7986109

00800712

1714710

14147

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 65: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 66: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup

bull LSPPersistent 714 BA vs 662 LA p=051

bull Increasing LA Size OR=085 p=052

bull Increasing AF Duration OR=096 p=013

bull Also No differences in CVA Coumadin use PPM

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 67: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Failures Donrsquot Often Come from the RA and if so are quick and easy to treat as an outpatient

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139860-7

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 68: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

What Have Others Found Recently

bull6

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 69: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Conclusions PVI is associated with lower rhythm success than an extended left atrial lesion set The addition of a right atrial lesion to an extended left atrial lesion set does not improve efficacy but it does increase the rate of pacemaker placement for sinus dysfunction Adding an LAA lesion may confer additional efficacy when added to a lesion set that includes PVI + MV

(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013145356-63)

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 70: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquohellipThere was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation between patients who underwent pulmonary-vein isolation and those who underwent the biatrialmaze procedure (610 and 660 respectively P=060)helliprdquo

N Eng J Med 2015372(15)1399-409

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 71: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

532 patients with Maze IV

44 pts with left only lesionsldquoThe success rates were reported for both the biatrialCMPIV and the left-sided CMPIV combined The left sided CMPIV lesion set was included in the analysis because the success rates were observed to be similar to that of the biatrial CMPIV However this group of patients was highly selected In our center a left-sided CMPIV was chosen for patients with paroxysmal AF left atrial sizelt50 cm and no evidence of right atrial enlargement In this selected group late efficacy was goodhelliprdquo

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015150(5)1168-76

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 72: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

LA-only ablation procedures included bilateral PVI (n = 82) with bipolar radiofrequency A PVI-only procedure is referred to as bilateral PVI (or bilateral antral PVI) whereas a more extensive lesion set is referred to as a box lesion in combination with connecting lines to the LA appendage and the mitral valve isthmus endocardially and epicardially over the coronary sinus PVI was accomplished with four to six repeated applications of bipolar radiofrequency

LA lesion set procedures (n = 28) were performed according to the Cox maze IIIIV lesion scheme only on the left atrium by using either a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal energy or cryothermal energy only

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

800 patients in study110 (14) LA only and 682 Cox Maze

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 73: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

LA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p valueSR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

Propensity score matched outcomesLA-only (n= 93) Cox Maze (n=93) p value

SR without AAD 6M 80 75 041SR without AAD 12M 85 83 074SR without AAD 24M 75 86 013Follow-up cardioversion 14 17 054Folllow-up catheter ablation 7 5 076Freedom from embolic stroke 951 989 021Freedom from TIA 901 930 053

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 74: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Europace (2015) 17 38-47

ldquoBiatrial and LA ablations produced comparable 30-day and late mortality but LA was associated with significantly reduced permanent pacemaker implantation rates Biatrial ablation appeared to be more efficacious than LA ablation in achieving SR at 1 year but this difference was not maintained beyond 1 yearrdquo

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 75: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Permanent Pacemaker Implant

173 in ablation group vs

55 in isolated Mitral Valve P=0003

75

24 in concomitant AVRvs

5 in stand alone Cox Maze IVP=0002

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 76: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92

PPM use by AF Lesion Type

Biatrial

149

Classic Maze

86

LA only

64

PVI

22

Effect

OR

OR 95 CI

P-Value

Age

104

101

106

00037

CABG

040

021

079

0008

TV Surgery

172

100

300

00493

MV Repair vs No MV Surgery

054

025

116

01132

MV Replacement vs No MV Surgery

225

111

458

00248

AF Surgery Type

1 Classic Maze vs Biatrial

085

034

213

07315

2 LA Only vs Biatrial

054

030

094

00317

3 PVI vs Biatrial

021

007

063

00053

Page 77: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo

Irsquod Rather Have a Late Right Side Ablation Than a Pacemaker the Rest

of My Life

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 78: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 79: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Summary

A Series Needs a Comparison

You Canrsquot Say it only Works in Uncomplicated AF if you didnrsquot use it in more Complex Patients

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 80: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Why This Study

bull Northwestern Has Extensive Experience with Both Lesion Sets

bull Hypothesis- In mitral valve surgery patients left atrial only (LA) and biatrial (BA) lesions result in similar outcomes

bull Objectives- Determine effectiveness of AF treatment with BA vs LA lesions

- Determine postoperative complication rate in different lesion set groups

- Determine possible subsets that may benefit

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 81: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg in press 2016

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 82: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 83: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Our study clearly demonstrates that early to intermediate success rates can be reasonably achieved with LA-only surgical ablation procedures in patients with no significant clinical predictors of failure However the results of the multivariate prediction models in this study should be evaluated with caution Although these modelsprovide initial evidence that ablation procedures confined to the LA may have reduced success in patients with traditional predictors of failure the small sample size and event rate limit the generalizability and reliability of these results

Ann Thorac Surg 201710358-65

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 84: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Presented at The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 52nd

Annual Meeting January 25 2016 Phoenix AZ

Of 914 patients studied 115 had LA only lesions

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 85: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

124 patients between 2004-2009 undergoing AVR +- CAB

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 86: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

J Heart Valve Dis 201221350-57

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 87: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 88: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Unmatched groups

0

5

10

15

Pre-discharge PMM p=0006

LA BA

0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU off AA p=050

LA BA0

20

40

60

80

FFAF at last FU p=057

LA BA

000200400600801

012

Stroke Rate per 10 personyear p=091

LA BA

75231306

73159217

75210280

72143198

724359

1334257

011 011

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 89: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Long term survival of the original groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 90: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Perioperative complications in propensity matched groups p=032

10370

4430

No complications Complications

9565

5235

Biatrial

No complications Complications

Left only

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 91: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital bull9

Long term survival in propensity matched groups

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
Page 92: Ablation Strategy, Appendage Management, and How to ... · 2017 Heart Valve Summit. Session VI: Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Mitral Regurgitation. ... Closure of the LAA

The Bluhm Cardiovascular InstituteNorthwestern Memorial Hospital

Heart Rhythm 201710 in press

Freedom from AF

ldquohellipstatement recommends a 3 month blanking period during which recurrences are not countedhelliprdquo

ldquohellipreaffirms the use of freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (eg AF AT AFL) greater than 30 seconds to be the gold standard for reporting the efficacy of AF ablationhellipstrict cutoff might underestimate the true benefit of ablationrdquo

  • Slide Number 1
  • Disclosures
  • AF Management with Valve Surgery in lsquo17
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Why Such Strong Guidelines
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • Slide Number 9
  • Unmatched Treated PAF Untreated PAF and No history of AF
  • PS MatchedSurvival
  • Does AF Treatment Change the Curve
  • Maze Surgery is Complicated
  • Prospective Randomized Trials of Permanent AF Ablation with Mitral Valve Surgery
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Cox Maze Procedure
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Cryoablation Not Just for Reops Anymore
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • What About the Appendage
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • What is ldquoSuccessrdquo Free From AF Off Antiarrthymics
  • Monitoring
  • PPM Most Accurate
  • Conclusions
  • Slide Number 33
  • What to Tell the Patient Before Surgery
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Peri-op Meds
  • Slide Number 37
  • Monitor OptionsZio and Reveal LINQ
  • If You Donrsquot Detect AF is it Safe to Stop AC
  • CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Slide Number 41
  • NM Freedom from Coumadin and Stroke
  • Slide Number 43
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • Post AF Surgery Guidelines
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Surgery (N=989)June lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • NMH AF Ablation and Mitral SurgeryJune lsquo06 to June lsquo16
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Team Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Slide Number 53
  • Controversy About AF Ablation Lesion Set
  • The Mechanism of AF in Our Surgical Patients is More Complicated than for Most Lone AF Patients and Experimental Studies
  • Slide Number 56
  • AF with MR is NOT The Same as Lone AF
  • Slide Number 58
  • Treating The Mitral Treats the AF
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Characteristics of Original Groups
  • Characteristics of PS-Matched Groups
  • Slide Number 64
  • Are There High Risk Subgroups Who May Benefit from BA More Extensive Lesions
  • No Difference in Matched High Risk Subgroups FFAF off AA Last Fup
  • Slide Number 67
  • What Have Others Found Recently
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Permanent Pacemaker Implant
  • Risk Factors for PPM Post-AF AblationNorthwestern All Surgery
  • ldquoIrsquod Rather Have a Pacemaker Than a Failed Ablationrdquo
  • Slide Number 78
  • Summary
  • Why This Study
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Unmatched groups
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92