Upload
sheera
View
21
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Academic Leadership Compensation Program (ALCP) Review. Why review ALCP?. Equity Allocation of funds It’s time …but first, a brief overview of “What is ALCP?”. Academic Leadership Compensation Program (ALCP). Purpose support instructional leadership needs & professional growth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Academic Leadership Compensation Program
(ALCP) Review
Why review ALCP?
Equity Allocation of funds It’s time
…but first, a brief overview of “What is ALCP?”
Academic Leadership Compensation Program (ALCP)
Purpose support instructional leadership needs &
professional growth
Background Transitioned from previous “Career Ladder”
model ALCP took effect 97/98 school year
ALCP administrative structure
2 varieties of ALCP stipends: Division Instructional Responsibilities Site (School) Based Responsibilities
The Divisional and Site-Based stipends differ by: mandated or optional responsibility Funding mechanism If the stipend $ amount can vary
ALCP - Division Instructional Responsibilities
Every school must have teachers assigned to these responsibilities
Responsibility for funding is at the divisional level
Amounts are pre-determined and do not vary Individual stipends from $500-$2000/yr,
depending on assignment
ALCP - Site (School) Based Responsibilities Principals can ‘create’ these site-based responsibilities as
needed a position rating scale is used to determine stipend amount
(range from $250-$2000/yr)
Site-based positions do not necessarily have an incumbent … and there are many different titles No school has a person in all of the possible positions
Responsibility for funding any desired positions lies with the specific school Paid for from their funding allocation, based on enrollment Number of positions staffed dependent on available funds
Examples of Elementary Site-Based stipends 504 Coordinator Academic Learning Program Schools (ALPS) Coordinator Administrative Support After School Tutor Art Exhibition Coordinator Behavior Committee Chair Camp K Coordinator Character Counts Coordinator Children At-Risk Education Teacher (CARE) Child Study Coordinator Content Area Support Crisis Team Coordinator Destination Imagination/OM Coordinator Emergency Medical Technician Specialist
Enrichment Teacher/Gifted Program Facilitator Extended Responsibilities – Guidance and
Library/Media Specialist
Grants Coordinator Kindergarten Assessment Coordinator Literacy Coordinator Newsletter Coordinator Program Improvement Committee (PIC) Photography Yearbook Coordinator PTO Liaison Public Relations Coordinator Publishing House Coordinator Safety Coordinator Special Education Support Teacher Special Programs/Projects Coordinator Spelling Bee Coordinator Steering Team Student Council Sponsor Student Records Reviewer Teacher Mentor Volunteer Coordinator Word Study Coordinator
Examples of Middle School Site-Based stipends After School Detention Art Exhibition Coordinator At-Risk Coordinator AutoSkills Pilot Coordinator Character Counts Child Study Coordinator Club Sponsor Community Coordinator Crisis Team Coordinator Extended Responsibilities – Library
Media Specialist Flag Sponsor Gifted/Honors Identification/Resource
Coordinator Grants Coordinator Intramurals/Clubs/Activities Sponsor Intramurals Teacher Math Counts Coordinator
Multicultural Committee Coordinator Peer Mediation Coordinator Performance (Choral/Band) Coordinator PTO Liaison Pupil Personnel Services Coordinator School Climate Coordinator School Newsletter Coordinator Spirit Team Sponsor Strategic Planner Student Council Association Coordinator Student Recognition Coordinator Summer Band Instructor Teacher Mentor Technology Troubleshooter – Assistant Video Production Coordinator Volunteer Coordinator Word Study Coordinator Yearbook Sponsor
Examples of HS Site-Based stipends Academic Competition for Excellence (ACE) Coach AP History Coordinator Assembly Schedule Coordinator Attendance Committee Band Director Bookstore Supervisor Calligrapher Campus Beautification Career Pathways Coordinator Child Study Coordinator Choral Director Class Sponsor Club Coordinator Club Sponsor College Essay Mentor Comprehensive Curriculum Project Coordinator Computer Facilitator - Assistant Crisis Team Coordinator Dean of Faculty Destination ImagiNation/ Odyssey of the Mind Coordinator Discipline Committee Drama Coach Drama Technical Coach Faculty Advisory Committee Faculty Recognition Coordinator Faculty-Student Relations Coordinator Grants Coordinator Historian Honor Council/Administrator Honor Society Sponsor Incentive for Success (IFS) Coordinator Independent Study Coordinator Info-line Coordinator Inter-Club Council Advisor/SuperFest Coordinator
Intramurals Sponsor Landscape Coordinator Leadership/Community Action Coordinator Literary Magazine Sponsor Literacy Support Coordinator Lunchtime Study Hall Coordinator Multicultural Committee National Honor Society Selection Committee/Coordinator Newspaper Sponsor PTO Liaison Peer Mediation Coach Principal Designee (Murray High Only) Publications Assistant Recertification Coordinator Recycling Coordinator Safety Coordinator Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Process Coordinator Special Events Coordinator Step-Shout Coordinator Student Assistance Program Student Council/Student Government Association Advisor Student Recognition Committee/Coordinator Student/Athlete Leadership Coordinator Student Leadership Training Facilitator Teacher Mentor Technology Committee Technology TroubleShooter - Assistant Transition/Transition and Orientation Program for Students
Coordinator Volunteer Coordinator Yearbook Advisor
Position Rating Scale for Site-Based stipends 6 categories, each assigned a point value:
Instructional Connection (0-6 points) This factor considers the coordination and organization of instruction activities, the impact of the role on
student learning, and the leadership required at the school and the division levels. Financial Responsibility (0-4 points)
This factor considers the degree of financial responsibility required by the teacher in executing his duties. The size of the budget, fundraising requirements, and allocation responsibilities are components considered in applying this criterion.
Direct Involvement with Students (0-4 points) This factor considers the number of students with whom the teacher has direct involvement in carrying
out his responsibilities for this assignment. Direct Involvement with Staff/Parents (0-4 points)
This factor considers the number of staff and parents with whom the teacher has direct involvement in carrying out his responsibilities for this assignment.
Time Requirements (0-6 points) Factors considered in rating this criterion include the amount of time the teacher is expected to use,
including school planning time, afterschool and weekend time commitment, as well as overnight supervision requirements.
Level of Responsibility (0-7 points) Factors considered here include the degree to which the teacher works independently, represents the
school to the public, and impacts the broader school community. Point total indicates annual stipend amount:
0-3 = $250; 4-6 = $500; 7-10 = $750; 11-14 = $1000; 15-18 = $1250; 19-22 = $1500; 23-26 = $1750; 27-30 = $2000
07-08 ALCP ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL DIVISION(05/30/07) 2007 - 2008 FUNDING ALLOCATION PLAN
plus local E&D positions $12500
Site-Based Allocations Will Be Adjusted Each Year Based On Student
Enrollment Projections By $250 For Each +/- Change Of 10 Students
(Allocation Based On Student Enrollment Projection From Supt. Proposed Budget)
BOTH
Students Amount Amount Amount
Elementary Schools
Agnor-Hurt 426 7,750.00 $15,750 $23,500
Baker Butler 500 9,000.00 $15,750 $24,750
Broadus Wood 281 5,000.00 $11,500 $16,500
Brownsville 439 8,000.00 $15,750 $23,750
Cale 550 10,000.00 $15,750 $25,750
Crozet 399 7,000.00 $15,750 $22,750
Greer 411 7,500.00 $15,750 $23,250
Hollymead 443 8,000.00 $15,750 $23,750
Meriwether-Lewis 412 7,500.00 $15,750 $23,250
Murray 270 4,750.00 $11,500 $16,250
Red Hill 180 3,250.00 $11,500 $14,750
Scottsville 170 3,000.00 $11,500 $14,500
Stone-Robinson 395 7,000.00 $15,750 $22,750
Stony Point 259 4,750.00 $11,500 $16,250
Woodbrook 319 5,500.00 $15,750 $21,250
Yancey (small school) 164 3,000.00 $11,500 $14,500
Subtotal 5,618 101,000.00 $226,500 $327,500
Middle Schools
Burley 511 13,000.00 $22,250 $35,250
Henley 792 20,250.00 $22,250 $42,500
J ouett 517 13,000.00 $22,250 $35,250
Sutherland 551 14,000.00 $22,250 $36,250
Walton 421 10,750.00 $22,250 $33,000
Subtotal 2,792 71,000.00 $111,250 $182,250
High Schools
Albemarle 1725 65,500.00 $27,500 $93,000
Monticello 1141 43,250.00 $27,500 $70,750
Western Albemarle 1083 41,000.00 $27,500 $68,500
Murray (Fixed Amount) 109 4,000.00 $7,750 $11,750
Subtotal 4,058 153,750.00 $90,250 $244,000
CO Coordinating Staff $19,079 $19,079
DIVISION RESPONSIBILITIESSITE-BASED LEADERSHIP
TOTAL FUNDING ALLOCATED: $772829
FUNDS HELD OUT FOR CONTINGENCY/TRANSITION: $0
So, to return to why we are reviewing ALCP …
Equity
Allocation of funds
It’s time
Review for Equity
Internal equity Perceptions of unfairness Varying workloads/responsibilities
External equity Never before compared externally, not a
consideration VEA data: Extra Pay for Extra Services
Review – Allocation of funds
Utility of stipends What is necessary? Are all of the divisional
responsibilities appropriate, since they are required?
Higher or lower priority?
Reallocation of funds What should be compensated more? Less?
Review - timeframe
ALCP structure established in 1997 Any changes since then? “Subject to annual review”
The goal of ALCP review?
Ensure that the program is compensating The right roles At the right rate
Information we have
We know that the program hasn’t been looked at in a long time, it’s probable that some tweaking is needed
Anecdotal issues of inequity from teachers Some feel they are not paid enough for their ALCP role,
others have said that they are receiving a stipend for doing very little
Board-adopted compensation strategy, with a defined competitive market, compared to VEA data
VEA Survey
Scope of VEA study: extra pay to teachers for extra services in Virginia school divisions
We took published data and cross-referenced for Albemarle adopted market responses Data indicated that we are generally below market
How do we proceed? To ensure that the program is compensating the right roles at the
right rates:
The ‘right roles’ Divisional:
Since Divisional are required, the usefulness of each one of these responsibilities should be scrutinized
Focus group to evaluate utility & determine which roles are appropriate for this category
Site-Based Since Site-Based are subject to Principals’ varying priorities & funding, they
are continually making their own determinations of utility – a review process is already built in here, but is it appropriate?
Focus group to review ALCP Position Rating Scale and approval process of role creation/stipend amount determination
Feedback on Divisional Roles Current Divisional Roles:
Lead Teacher/Department Chairs English (Middle, HS) Mathematics (Middle, HS) Science (Middle, HS) Social Studies (Middle, HS) Instructional Council Member K-2 (Elem) Instructional Council Member 3-5 (Elem) Core Content Support (Elem) Health/PE (Elem, Middle, HS) Fine Arts (HS) Practical Arts (HS) World Language (Middle, HS) Media (HS) Instructional Technology (Elem, Middle, HS) Special Education (Elem, Middle HS)
School Improvement (Elem, Middle, HS) Team Leaders (Large Elem, Middle) Technology Troubleshooter (Elem, Middle, HS) Testing Coordinator (Elem, Middle, HS) Web Page Coordinator (Elem, Middle, HS) Teacher Mentor (Elem, Middle, HS) Equity & Diversity Coordinator (Elem, Middle, HS)
What other roles, if any, should be Divisional?
How do we proceed?
To ensure that the program is compensating the right roles at the right rates: The ‘right rates’
Once the right roles are established, use market data along with the Position Rating Scale to determine appropriate stipend amount Need to gather information from administration (divisional)
and principals/incumbents (schools) Is the existing Position Rating Scale appropriate?
Position Rating ScaleH
as n
o in
stru
ctio
nal c
onne
ctio
n
Dis
sem
inat
es in
stru
ctio
nal i
nfo
to b
uild
ing
staf
f
Act
s as
liai
son
betw
een/
amon
g gr
oups
re:in
stru
ctio
nal
mat
ters
Wor
ks w
ith in
divi
dual
s an
d/or
sm
all g
roup
s on
a li
mite
d ba
sis
to p
rom
ote
inst
ruct
iona
l gro
wth
Wor
ks w
ith in
divi
dual
s an
d/or
sm
all g
roup
s on
an
ongo
ing
basi
s to
pro
mot
e in
stru
ctio
nal g
row
th
Coo
rdin
ates
/org
aniz
es in
stru
ctio
nal a
ctiv
ities
that
hav
e a
dire
ct im
pact
on
stud
ent l
earn
ing
Tak
es le
ader
ship
in in
stru
ctio
nal m
atte
rs fo
r the
div
isio
n an
d/or
sch
ool
Req
uire
s m
inor
or n
o in
tera
ctio
n w
ith s
choo
l boo
kkee
per
Req
uire
s re
gula
r int
erac
tion
with
sch
ool b
ookk
eepe
r
Req
uire
s re
gula
r mai
nten
ance
of b
udge
t inc
ludi
ng
allo
catio
ns to
oth
ers
Req
uire
s si
gnif
ican
t fun
drai
sing
/bre
akin
g ev
en w
ith
amou
nts
up to
$15
,000
Req
uire
s si
gnif
ican
t fun
drai
sing
/bre
akin
g ev
en w
ith
amou
nts
over
$15
,000
Invo
lves
1-4
stu
dent
s
Invo
lves
5-1
0 st
uden
ts
Invo
lves
11-
30 s
tude
nts
Invo
lves
31-
100
stud
ents
Invo
lves
ove
r 100
stu
dent
s
N/A
Invo
lves
1-1
0 st
aff/
pare
nts
Invo
lves
11-
25 s
taff
/par
ents
Invo
lves
ove
r 25
staf
f/pa
rent
s
Use
s pl
anni
ng/lu
ncht
ime
aver
age
1-3
days
/wee
k
Use
s pl
anni
ng/lu
ncht
ime
aver
age
4-5
days
/wee
k
Use
s af
ters
choo
l/eve
ning
tim
e av
erag
e 1-
2 da
ys/w
eek
Use
s af
ters
choo
l/eve
ning
tim
e av
erag
e 3-
5 da
ys/w
eek
Is o
n-ca
ll to
trou
ble-
shoo
t on
a lim
ited
basi
s
Is o
n-ca
ll to
trou
ble-
shoo
t on
an o
ngoi
ng b
asis
Use
s w
eeke
nd ti
me
4 tim
es/y
ear
Req
uire
s ov
erni
ght s
uper
visi
on
Wor
ks in
depe
nden
tly
Rep
rese
nts
the
scho
ol to
the
publ
ic/c
omm
unity
Supe
rvis
es s
tude
nts
and/
or s
taff
Impa
cts
targ
eted
gro
up o
f stu
dent
s
Rep
rese
nts
the
scho
ol o
n co
mm
ittee
s/ta
sk fo
rces
Mak
es s
igni
fica
nt im
pact
on
over
all s
choo
l pro
gram
Und
ergo
es s
igni
fica
nt p
ublic
scr
utin
y
Points 0-3 4-6
7-10 11-14 15-18 19-22 23-26 27-30
$ 250 500 750
1,000 1,250 1,500 1,750 2,000
List Positions Total Stipend $
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Principal Assistant Superintendent for Instruction
(5) Time Required (maximum 6 points)
(6) Level of Independence/ Responsibility
(maximum 7 points)
choose one
choose one
choose one
(1) Instructional Connection (2) Financial Responsibility (3) Level of Direct Student
Involvement
(4) Level of Direct
Staff/Parent Involvement
Academic Leadership Compensation: Position Rating ScaleDirections: For categories 1-4 select one appropriate point value. Add points as indicated for categories 5-6.