Upload
nathen-lansdowne
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE
Lynn Jones
Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager
DEFINITION
To conduct any act whereby a person may
obtain for himself/herself or for another, an unpermitted
advantage
EXAMPLES
Plagiarism Collusion Re-use of one’s own material
Contracting with a third party to write a piece of work
Fabrication of data Introduction of unauthorised material into an
exam room or associated facilities Impersonation of an examination candidate
or allowing oneself to be impersonated
DETECTION
Suspicions by markers should be reported to the Programme Leader
Allegations to be supported by documentary evidence
Turnitin is useful tool but not conclusive
To be used when there are suspicions of academic misconduct but inadequate documentary evidence
Marker and another member of academic staff within the department to interview student
Brief report to Academic Head who will decide whether or not to pursue
Academic Investigative Interview
DETERMINATION OF LEVEL OF OFFENCE
Minor Indiscretion
Minor Academic Misconduct
Major Academic Misconduct
RESPONSIBILITY FOR DETERMINATION
Academic Head and Programme Leader
If offence occurs during an examination, Superintendant of Examinations in consultation with Academic Head
MAJOR ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
Programme Leader to advise RAAU who will organise Committee of Enquiry
Case against student to be presented by the Programme Leader or nominee
Decision made by Committee on balance of probabilities
Extenuating circumstances can be considered in determination of penalty only
PENALTIES
Range of recommended penalties provided for guidance
Factors to be considered - is it a first offence, has the student tried to deliberately deceive, has the offence been committed early on in the student’s studies
Extenuating circumstances can be considered if relevant and timely documentary evidence is provided
If a student is studying on a professional programme and a minor case of Academic Misconduct is found proven, consider under Stage 1 of the procedure
If a student is studying on a professional programme and a major case of Academic Misconduct is found proven, consider under Stage 1 or 2 of the procedure
SUITABILITY FOR PRACTICE
Student can bring along someone for support but that person may not speak without Chair’s permission
If student wants to bring a person with legal qualifications or a professional body representative, University must be advised in advance
CAN STUDENT BE ACCOMPANIED AT A HEARING?
If student confirms attendance but does not attend without good reason the hearing will continue
If student requests postponement Chair can grant this on one occasion only if evidence of mitigation is provided
If student advises non attendance or does not reply to communications, hearing will continue without student
ATTENDANCE AT HEARINGS
Grounds for Appeal
Irregularity in the conduct of the hearing
Exceptional personal circumstances which were not known when the hearing was conducted
MINOR – if accepted, refer for consideration by Committee of Enquiry
MAJOR – if accepted, refer for consideration by Appeal Panel
OIA – Following completion of internal procedures, student may apply for a review
APPEALS
The procedure can be found on the X drive under
Academic Misconduct along with other useful
documents.