Upload
panfilo-romani
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Adaptive telescope mirror developments in Arcetri
A. Riccardi
Adaptive secondary concept
Reference plateHeat-sink and act.support plate
Electronics boxes
deformable shell
Concept: Substitution of conventional M2 telescope mirror with a thin (1.5-2.0mm) deformable shells controlled in position with large-stroke (~0.1mm) electromagnetic (voice-coil like) force actuators and using internal capacitive sensors as position feedback
Central membranefor lateral support
Control electronics
Communication Board (1x backplane)
DSP control Board (14x backplane)
Reference Signal Generator Board (1x backplane)
Communication Board (1x backplane)
DSP control Board (14x backplane)
Reference Signal Generator Board (1x backplane)
Communication Board (1x backplane)
DSP control Board (14x backplane)
Reference Signal Generator Board (1x backplane)
Communication Board (1x backplane)
DSP control Board (14x backplane)
Reference Signal Generator Board (1x backplane)
Communication Board (1x backplane)
DSP control Board (14x backplane)
Reference Signal Generator Board (1x backplane)
Communication Board (1x backplane)
DSP control Board (14x backplane)
Reference Signal Generator Board (1x backplane)
Liquid cooled crates, each comprehending 2 backplanes (3x)
Distribution boards
Actuators
Gap
Thin mirrorReference signal
Power
± 48V, 35 A
Real timecomm link2.9 Gbit/s(MMT160Mb/s)
Daisy chain connection
DSP control Board (14x backplane)
DSP control Board (14x backplane)
Coil
3 cooled electronics boxes2 crates/box84 custom DSP boards2 DSP/board - 8 acts/board32-bit floating-point 470Mmac/s(MMT: 16-bit integer 40Mmac/s)
Gigabit Ethernet SwitchDiagnostic communication linkTo the AOsupervisor 400Mbit/s
Total computational power:78 Gmac/s (32bit fp)Real-time reconstructor on-boardWFS: 30x30 => 34-47s (z-m)Slope comm time: 20s
Why and adaptive telescope mirror?
WFS
Sci. Camera
DM
Coll.
TTMBS
ConventionalSecondary
AdaptiveSecondary
Sci. Camera
WFS
Less warmsurfaces
K band: 2-2.6shorter exp.time(MLH, PASP)
AdaptiveSecondary
Advantages
Un solo correttore per tutti i fuochi (es. LBT: 4 fuochi/pup)Maggiore riflettività (5 riflessioni eliminate: 0.985=0.90)Minore emissività IR (1/3-1/4 exp.time K-N bg-limited)Compattezza della parte di sensing (maggiore stabilità)Attuatori elettromagnetici con feedback capacitivo:
• Grande stroke: TTM+DM+chopper+FS in un’unica unità• Unità robusta rispetto malfunzionamento di attuatori
Tecnologia estendibile a specchi adattivi per ELTs• Grande stroke (wind bufferting)• >104att., grande numero attuatori grandi specchi adatt.
Overview of developments
MMT Adaptive Secondary(on sky 2000)
Joint venture OAA-StewardMG-ADS contract CAAO
LBT Adaptive Secondary(integration phase, on-sky 2008)
VLT Adaptive Secondary(design phase, on-sky 2015)INAF under OPTICON-JRA1MG-ADS subcontract with ESO
TEC0-TEC1: EU funded underthe ELT-DS projectMG-ADS subcontract INAF
M4-ARU EELT: ESO funded developmentMG-ADS proposal for contractINAF subcontract of MG-ADS
Magellan Adaptive Secondary(copy of LBT, on-sky ???)
MMT on sky
mV 8.0 (B0V)
Credits:http://athene.as.arizona.edu/~lclose/AOPRESS/
Existing adaptive mirror in hardware
MMT:336 act640mm diam2.0mm thick31 mm/act (Jan 2003)
640mm
P45protoP45proto
LBT (2 units):672 act911mm diam1.6mm thick31 mm/act(in production)
Integration of final unitIntegration of final unit
911mm
INAF, Steward Obs, Microgate Srl, ADS Int. Srl
LBT integration progress
Next ASM generation: VLT-DSM
VLT-DSM1.1m1170 act. 29 mm pitch 1 ms response
VLT-DSMVLT-DSM
ESO, Microgate Srl, ADS Int. Srl, INAF
Current technology: a comparison
Current technology: a comparison
Current limitation in BW (or stroke)
7kHz
Capsens-coil crosstalkCurrently it limits derivative gainSome level of natural damping is still req.70um gap: 0.7-0.9ms settling time100um gap: 1.2-1.7ms settling time
CL Actuator transferfunction (with deriv gain=0)
Item to solve in the commissioned studiesespecially for TEC0 (larger mass, larger gap, larger derivative gain required)
In case of glass, keeping constant g-quilting:Mass per actuator: ~6.5g (LBT,TEC1-30mm) : ~350g (TEC0-100mm) : ~30g (TEC0-50mm)
Noise vs gap (i.e. stroke)
40um gap 70um gap
130um gap
TEC0 and TEC1 target
Feasibility study of 2.5m DM with actuator spacing of: DM-TEC 0: woofer corrector, medium stroke field stabilizer
50-100mm actuator pitch (2000-500 acts) 200m PtV stroke (±2as on-sky for 42m telesc.) (300m goal) with high efficiency actuator prototype
DM-TEC 1: tweeter corrector, low stroke field stabilizer corrector25-30mm actuator pitch (7800-5400 acts) 100m PtV stroke (±1as on-sky for 42m telesc.) (200m goal) with scale down prototype (~100act)
Towards an Adaptive ELT
Part of the technological solutions currently used cannot directly transferred to Adaptive ELT, in particular:
Production of optical flat/concave/convex thin (~2mm) glass shell with diam>1m is not proven. See FP6 studies by SESO and INAF-Brera.See studies with other material like CFRP
Lateral support from central membrain could induce too large stresses (diam) on glass and for membrane buckling. Alternative lateral support shall be studied also to avoid holes in case of segments
Current reference+cold plate scheme is not applicable for large mirrors: More favorable stiffness-to-mass ratio backplate will be studied.
Larger stroke required (70um -> 100-300um): larger dynamical range capacitive sensor shall be studied with reduced noise at large gap. Crosstalk has to be reduced to increase electronic damping (large gap with large BW).
Comparison among alternative materials
CFPR by “Composite Mirror applications”
Tucson, AZ