1
FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS ISE 50 μm Open-circuit voltageV (mV) Ag AgCu1 36.5 37.0 37.5 Short-circuit current density j SC (mA·cm - ²) R f (screen-printing) << R f (inkjet-printing) FF (screen-printing) < FF (inkjet-printing) High fingers (e.g. screen-printing): PCB Touch contacts fingers only. Thin fingers (e.g. inkjet-printing): PCB Touch contacts fingers and ITO. 0 1 2 3 4 5 77 78 79 80 81 82 Fill factor FF (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 FF (%) Layer number Measured Measured (guide to the eye) Corrected Ag AgCu1 78 79 80 Fill factor FF (%) Ag AgCu1 20.5 21.0 21.5 22.0 22.5 Conversion efficiency h (%) 50 μm Screen-Printing of Silver-Coated Copper Paste Advanced Metallization with Low Silver Consumption for Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells J. Schube 1 , T. Fellmeth 1 , M. Jahn 1 , R. Keding 1 , S. W. Glunz 1,2 1 Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, Heidenhofstrasse 2, 79110 Freiburg, Germany, Phone +49 761/4588-5058, [email protected] 2 Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Emmy-Noether-Str. 2, 79110 Freiburg, Germany Introduction Ag is a main cost driver in photovoltaics production [1] Metallization with Ag reduction potential for Silicon Heterojunction (SHJ) solar cells investigated Screen-printing of Ag-coated copper paste [2] Pot. 30% Ag reduction Inkjet-printing of Ag nanoparticle ink [3] > 90% Ag reduction FlexTrail-printing of Ag nanoparticle ink > 90% Ag reduction 21.6% median efficiency achieved with pure Ag and Ag-coated copper V OC on similar level for both groups (mean value is 734.4 ± 1.0 mV) Finger widths and finger resistances (40 μm screen openings) Paste AgCu: 60 ± 2 μm and 2.1 ± 0.1 W/cm Paste Ag: 49 ± 1 μm and 2.8 ± 0.3 W/cm Inkjet-Printing of Ag Nanoparticle Ink Dependence on the printed layer number per finger Busbarless SHJ solar cells Correction of PCB Touch [4] measurement necessary (see also Ref. [5]) The lower the layer number the higher the j SC Highest FF with one/two printed layers (see explanation below) FlexTrail-Printing of Ag Nanoparticle Ink Microscopy images at a magnification of 50 of an inkjet-printed finger (one layer) (left) and a FlexTrail-printed finger (right) on alkaline textured SHJ solar cells. Conclusion This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy within the research project “ATAKAMA” under contract 0324144. Jörg Schube gratefully acknowledges the scholarship support from the Reiner Lemoine-Stiftung. Special thanks are directed to PV Nano Cell, Namics, and Kyoto Elex. FlexTrail is established at Fraunhofer ISE as a novel printing technology Printing of commercially available Ag nanoparticle ink FlexTrail’s arguments Printing of ultra-fine lines, flexible layouts Large process window, simple handling Higher process stability compared with inkjet-printing (e.g. clogging) IV-data of busbarless SHJ solar cells with inkjet- and FlexTrail-printed front grids (80 fingers) measured by means of PCB Touch, each one exhibiting the highest h. w f = 75 μm w f = 16 μm 21.6% median efficiency of bifacial five busbar SHJ solar cells achieved with screen-printed Ag-coated copper paste and silver paste 23.3% maximum efficiency of a busbarless bifacial SHJ solar cell utilizing a inkjet-printed front grid achieved FlexTrail-printing allows for 23.7% maximum efficiency of a busbarless bifacial SHJ solar cell h, FF, and j SC of SHJ solar cells with five busbars (at least 6 samples per group). [1] ITRPV consortium, ITRPV, 2018 [2] K. Nakamura et al., 35 th EU PVSEC, 2018 [3] J. Hermans et al., SNEC PV Power Expo., 2015 [4] N. Bassi et al., 29 th EU PVSEC, 2014 [5] M. Rauer et al., 8 th metallization workshop, 2019, tbp. SEM images of an inkjet-printed one-layer-finger’s (left) and a screen-printed finger’s (right) cross-section. j SC and FF of SHJ solar cells with inkjet-printed front grids. IV-data (median values) of busbarless SHJ solar cells with comparable grid layouts. Contacting extreme thin fingers with PCB Touch Includes contacting by means of PCB Touch! Layer number Open-circuit voltage V (mV) 0 1 2 3 4 5 37.5 38.0 38.5 39.0 39.5 Layer number Short-circuit current density j SC (mA· cm - ²) Printing technique V OC (mV) j SC (mA/cm²) FF (%) h (%) Inkjet-printing (one layer) 733.8 38.7 81.6 23.1 Screen-printing 736.8 37.9 80.1 22.4 Printing technique V OC (mV) j SC (mA/cm²) FF (%) h (%) Inkjet-printing 736.7 38.7 81.5 23.2 FlexTrail-printing 737.4 39.2 82.1 23.7

Advanced Metallization with Low Silver Consumption for ... · FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS ISE 50 µm Ag AgCu1 78 79 80 factor FF (%) Ag AgCu1 732 733 734 735 736

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    12

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS ISE

    50 µm

    Ag AgCu1

    78

    79

    80

    Fill

    facto

    r F

    F (

    %)

    Ag AgCu1732

    733

    734

    735

    736

    737

    Open-c

    ircuit v

    oltage

    VO

    C (

    mV

    )

    Ag AgCu136.5

    37.0

    37.5

    Short

    -circuit c

    urr

    ent density

    j SC (

    mA

    ·cm

    - ²)

    Ag AgCu120.5

    21.0

    21.5

    22.0

    22.5

    Convers

    ion e

    ffic

    iency

    h (

    %)

    Rf (screen-printing) 90% Ag reduction

    FlexTrail-printing of Ag nanoparticle ink > 90% Ag reduction

    21.6% median efficiency achieved with pure Ag and Ag-coated copper VOC on similar level for both groups (mean value is 734.4 ± 1.0 mV) Finger widths and finger resistances (40 µm screen openings) Paste AgCu: 60 ± 2 µm and 2.1 ± 0.1 W/cm Paste Ag: 49 ± 1 µm and 2.8 ± 0.3 W/cm

    Inkjet-Printing of Ag Nanoparticle Ink

    Dependence on the printed layer number per finger

    Busbarless SHJ solar cells Correction of PCB Touch [4] measurement necessary (see also Ref. [5]) The lower the layer number the higher the jSC Highest FF with one/two printed layers (see explanation below)

    FlexTrail-Printing of Ag Nanoparticle Ink

    Microscopy images at a magnification of 50 of an inkjet-printed finger (one layer) (left) and a FlexTrail-printed finger (right) on alkaline textured SHJ solar cells.

    Conclusion

    This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy within the research project “ATAKAMA” under contract 0324144. Jörg Schube gratefully acknowledges the scholarship support from the Reiner Lemoine-Stiftung. Special thanks are directed to PV Nano Cell, Namics, and Kyoto Elex.

    FlexTrail is established at Fraunhofer ISE as a novel printing technology Printing of commercially available Ag nanoparticle ink FlexTrail’s arguments Printing of ultra-fine lines, flexible layouts Large process window, simple handling Higher process stability compared with inkjet-printing (e.g. clogging)

    IV-data of busbarless SHJ solar cells with inkjet- and FlexTrail-printed front grids (80 fingers) measured by means of PCB Touch, each one exhibiting the highest h.

    wf = 75 µm wf = 16 µm

    21.6% median efficiency of bifacial five busbar SHJ solar cells achieved with screen-printed Ag-coated copper paste and silver paste

    23.3% maximum efficiency of a busbarless bifacial SHJ solar cell utilizing a inkjet-printed front grid achieved

    FlexTrail-printing allows for 23.7% maximum efficiency of a busbarless bifacial SHJ solar cell

    h, FF, and jSC of SHJ solar cells with five busbars (at least 6 samples per group).

    [1] ITRPV consortium, ITRPV, 2018

    [2] K. Nakamura et al., 35th EU PVSEC, 2018

    [3] J. Hermans et al., SNEC PV Power Expo., 2015

    [4] N. Bassi et al., 29th EU PVSEC, 2014

    [5] M. Rauer et al., 8th metallization workshop, 2019, tbp.

    SEM images of an inkjet-printed one-layer-finger’s (left) and a screen-printed finger’s (right) cross-section.

    jSC and FF of SHJ solar cells with inkjet-printed front grids.

    IV-data (median values) of busbarless SHJ solar cells with comparable grid layouts.

    Contacting extreme thin fingers with PCB Touch

    Includes contacting by means of PCB Touch!

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    733

    734

    735

    736

    737

    Layer number

    Op

    en

    -cir

    cu

    it v

    olta

    ge

    VO

    C (

    mV

    )

    0 1 2 3 4 521.0

    21.5

    22.0

    22.5

    23.0

    23.5

    Co

    nve

    rsio

    n e

    ffic

    ien

    cy

    h (

    %)

    Measured

    0 1 2 3 4 521.0

    21.5

    22.0

    22.5

    23.0

    Measured (guide to the eye)

    Corrected

    h (

    %)

    Layer number

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    77

    78

    79

    80

    81

    82

    Fill

    fa

    cto

    r F

    F (

    %)

    0 1 2 3 4 575

    76

    77

    78

    79

    80

    81

    FF

    (%

    )

    Layer number

    0 1 2 3 4 537.5

    38.0

    38.5

    39.0

    39.5

    Layer number

    Sh

    ort

    -circu

    it c

    urr

    en

    t d

    en

    sity

    j SC (

    mA

    ·cm

    - ²)

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    733

    734

    735

    736

    737

    Layer number

    Op

    en

    -cir

    cu

    it v

    olta

    ge

    VO

    C (

    mV

    )

    0 1 2 3 4 521.0

    21.5

    22.0

    22.5

    23.0

    23.5

    Co

    nve

    rsio

    n e

    ffic

    ien

    cy

    h (

    %)

    Measured

    0 1 2 3 4 521.0

    21.5

    22.0

    22.5

    23.0

    Measured (guide to the eye)

    Corrected

    h (

    %)

    Layer number

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    77

    78

    79

    80

    81

    82

    Fill

    fa

    cto

    r F

    F (

    %)

    0 1 2 3 4 575

    76

    77

    78

    79

    80

    81

    FF

    (%

    )

    Layer number

    0 1 2 3 4 537.5

    38.0

    38.5

    39.0

    39.5

    Layer number

    Sh

    ort

    -circu

    it c

    urr

    en

    t d

    en

    sity

    j SC (

    mA

    ·cm

    - ²)

    Printing technique VOC (mV)

    jSC (mA/cm²)

    FF (%)

    h (%)

    Inkjet-printing (one layer) 733.8 38.7 81.6 23.1

    Screen-printing 736.8 37.9 80.1 22.4 Printing technique VOC (mV)

    jSC (mA/cm²)

    FF (%)

    h (%)

    Inkjet-printing 736.7 38.7 81.5 23.2

    FlexTrail-printing 737.4 39.2 82.1 23.7