Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Government of India Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Office of Development Commissioner (MSME), 7th Floor, A Wing,
Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi-110108
Agenda
for
54th Meeting of Steering Committee
of
Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP)
Date &Time : 02.03.2021 at 3:00 PM Venue : New Delhi
INDEX
Agenda Points
Description Page No.
54.1 Confirmation of Minutes 1
54.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2
54.3 Proposals for Final Approval
Andhra Pradesh
54.3.1 CFC in Gold Ornaments Cluster, Jaggayyapet, Krishna District 3
54.3.2 CFC in Printing Cluster, Kakinada, East Godavari 10
54.3.3 CFC in Pulses & Pulses Products Cluster, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari
17
54.3.4 Up-gradation of Industrial Park (Jewellery Park), Machlipatnam 24
54.3.5 Up-gradation of Growth Centre, Hindupur, Ananthapuramu 28
54.3.6 Up-gradation of Industrial Park Autonagar, Guntur 32
Goa
54.3.7 CFC in Maritime Cluster, Goa 36
Gujarat
54.3.8 CFC in Imitation Jewellery Cluster, Ahmedabad 43
Haryana
54.3.9 CFC in Ayurveda Cluster, Karnal 49
Kerala
54.3.10 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate Rubber Park at Irapuram, Ernakulam
58
Madhya Pradesh
54.3.11 CFC in Engineering Cluster, Govindpura, Bhopal 62
54.3.12 Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Sanawad District Khargaone 70
54.3.13 Setting up of new Industrial Estate Food Processing at Rajgarh 74
54.3.14 Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Choradongari Village, District Betul
78
54.3.15 Setting up of new Akodi Lac Industrial Estate at Balaghat 82
Manipur
54.3.16 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Imphal East District 86
54.3.17 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Katomei, Senapati District 92
Odisha
54.3.18 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Angaragadia, Balasore 98
54.3.19 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Chandaka (Phase-I), Khorda 102
54.3.20 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Paradeep, Jagatsinghpur 106
54.3.21 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack 110
Punjab
54.3.22 CFC in Sewing Machine Cluster, Ludhiana 114
54.3.23 CFC in Cutting Tool Cluster, Patiala 121
Tamil Nadu
54.3.24 CFC in Jewellery Cluster, Tirunelveli 129
Telangana
Agenda Points
Description Page No.
54.3.25 Setting up of New Industrial Estate, Mandapally, Siddipet 137
Uttar Pradesh
54.3.26 CFC in Terracotta Pottery Cluster, Gorakhapur 141
54.4 Proposals for Time Extension
Telangana
54.4.1 Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Automotive & Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District
148
54.5 Ratification of Decisions Haryana 54.5.1 CFC in Stainless Steel Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana 150 54.5.2 CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana 151 54.5.3 CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana 152 54.5.4 CFC in Plastic & Packaging Cluster, Karnal 153 Kerala 54.5.5 Up-gradation of ID Plots at Edayar, Ernakulam District 154 54.5.6 Up-gradation of Industrial Development Project at Poovanthuruthu,
Kottayam District 155
Madhya Pradesh 54.5.7 CFC in Plastic & Packaging Cluter, Ujjain 157 Punjab 54.5.8 CFC in Hi-tech Cluster, Mohali 158 54.5.9 CFC in Oil Expeller & Parts Manufacturing Cluster, Ludhiana 159 Uttar Pradesh 54.5.10 CFC in Readymade Garments Cluster, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 160
54.5.11 CFC in Zari Zardozi Cluster, Unnao 161
54.6 Any Other
54.6.1 CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Balasore – Deletion of Proposed facilities 162
********
1
Item No. 54.1. : Confirmation of Minutes of 53rd Meeting of National Level Steering Committee held on 14.07.2020.
Minutes of 53rd Meeting of Steering Committee held on 14.07.20 were uploaded on the website and communicated to stakeholders. Minutes are annexed at Annexure-I. Since no comments have been received from any of the members, minutes may kindly be confirmed.
******
2
Item No. 54.2 : Action Taken Report on the action points of 53rd Meeting of Steering
Committee Item No. Item Description Decision Taken Action Taken 53.3.1 to 53.3.32
Final approval for various proposals. Final approval accorded Communicated to all concerned
53.4.1 to 53.4.5
Ratification of decisions taken on file.
Ratified the decision of time extension.
53.5 Any Other Points
53.5.1 to 53.5.3
Re-allocation of funds in respect of up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Phase-IV, Ludhiana, Punjab. Re-allocation of funds in respect of up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Jalandhar, Punjab. Setting up of Integrated Infrastructure Development (IID) Centre at Raikot, Ludhiana, Punjab.
53rd NLSC minutes attached.
53.6 Extension of Time 53.6.1(S) Setting up of CFC in Global Puffed
Rice Cluster, Holalkere Road,
Chitradurga, Karnataka.
Ratified the decision of time extension.
*******
3
Agenda No. 54.3.1: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Gold Ornament Cluster, Jaggayyapeta, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh.
Background
Proposal was recommended in the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) meeting held on 20.12.19 for final approval.
Vide letter dated 24.09.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years).
Provided
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iii) Details of officials of Govt. of AP and Govt. of India on the Board of
CFC. Provided
(iv) Document regarding authorized share capital and paid up capital. Provided (v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Provided
(vi) Copy of Memorandum of Association and Article of Association. Provided (vii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Required (viii) Details of project specific bank account. Required (ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the
cluster are Micro/ SC/ST/ Women Enterprises, as the case may be. Provided
(x) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(xi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Provided
(xii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Provided
(xiii) Recommendation of Senior Most Technical officer of MSME-DO. Provided (xiv) Comments of Economic Officer of MSME-DO on the project proposal
on economic viability of the project. Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of cluster Name of cluster Gold Ornament Cluster
District Krishna
Location of cluster Jaggayyapeta
Lok Sabha Constituency Vijayawada
Main Product Gold Bangles, Gold Bracelet, Gold Chains & Gold Rings, Gold Idols, Gold Lockets, Gold Earrings , Gold Necklace, Gold Nose Pins & Nose Rings
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro - 195
Turnover for the last five years (Rs in Crore)
2014-15 : Rs. 18.50 2015-16 : Rs. 19.00 2016-17 : Rs. 19.50 2017-18 : Rs. 20.10 2018-19 : Rs. 20.95
4
Exports for the last five years (Rs in Crore)
Nil
Employment in cluster Direct 1050 Indirect 365
Technology details Hand tools, small furnace, Dies for Moulding, Wire Drawing Machine, Sheet Drawing Machine etc.
Whether DS conducted Yes
Main findings of DSR Fairly Good Skills, Scope for Use of CAD CAM, Good Domestic Demand, No Visible Exports, High Wastage
Main Problems of cluster High Wastage No Testing and Hall Marking facilities in the cluster, No CAD CAM facility in the cluster, High cost of machinery non affordable to micro enterprises
Other Information Cluster know for supply of jewelleries to royal families also known for making gold idols and ornaments for famous temples.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC More than 1950 artisans (Organized and Unorganized) lack basic infrastructure facilities and proper tools in the cluster and are depending on part manufacturing firms for making of various types of gold ornaments. Further the die used by them are old with redundant design. Hence there is a need for establishment of Die Moulding Centre in the cluster. It will also have sheet and wire drawing facility which will reduce the wastage as compared to the existing machines in the cluster. The proposed facility will cater to the needs of 800 (Both Organized and Unorganized) firm in the cluster. As BIS has made it mandatory for Jewellery Industry to follow hall mark norms and maintain the specified purity, majority of the cluster firms are finding it tough to know purity of the ornament they make. This is resulting in higher rejection rates and dent in profit margins. Further non availability of Hall Marking facility in the vicinity of the cluster forces the artisan to send jewellery far off distance to comply with the norms, which is costing them higher than the standard industry norms. Thus there is definite need to establish a common testing cum 3D laser Hall Mark Facility in the cluster to overcome the gap. The cluster is also into manufacturing of Necklace, which needs proper designing and prototyping for casting. The cluster do not have a CAD / CAM facility and are dependent on facilities in Mumbai. The time and
5
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
cost involved for utilizing CAD / CAM in Mumbai is high and is hampering the growth of the cluster. Hence a CAD/ CAM facility is proposed as CFC.
(b.) Location of CFC RS. No. 275/1A1, D. No. 2-118, Jaggayyapeta, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh
% age of units in radius of 5km 100
% age of units in radius of 10km
0
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes Lease deed for a period of 33 years in the name of SPV received.
ii. Title is in name of M. Pavani and M. Pratyusha
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use Under Process
vi. If on lease, duration of lease 33 Years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area (sq ft)
3475
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 1381 per Sq. Ft.
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Die Moulding Centre Common Testing cum 3D Laser Hall Marking Centre Common CAD / CAM Centre XRF (X-Ray Florence Spectrometer) Metal Analysis.
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 36000 job works in Die Moulding 600 Kg of Sheet & Wire Drawing 63000 testing & hall markings 2400 Design per annum 30000 CAM jobs per annum
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
The proposed hard interventions will show substantial increase in the tangible parameters like in number of units, employment, production. Besides, intangible aspects like major improvement in quality and increase the domestic sales by minimum of 30 percent and also open up the avenues for export market. The following table substantiates the above points: Table E3: Performance of the Cluster post intervention Sl. No. Parameters Pre-CFC Post CFC 1 Beneficiary Units 195 800 2 Increase in Employment (Both Direct & Indirect in core Cluster firms) 1415 1890 3 Increase in production (Kg) 1500 1985 4 Domestic Sales 20.95 29.00 5 Profit Margin 5% 10% 6 Indirect Export Sales 0 1.00 All the 800 (Both Organized & Unorganized) firms are expected to get
6
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
benefitted from the establishment of CFC. Each and every facility of the CFC will be open for use of the Cluster firms irrespective of if they are members or not in the SPV. However the beneficiary unit figure may vary from one facility to another. The employment and production is expected to grow at the rate of 20% considering increase in production capacities of goldsmiths and part manufacturing firms due to establishment of common processing centre and initiation of direct marketing. A 30% growth in turnover is expected at cluster level due to increased production levels by cluster firms with processing centre, improved market share due to quality and hall marking besides inflation. The profit are expected to improve by 100% from current level of 5% to 10% post implementation of the CFC. The improved quality and hall marking will definitely pave the way for composite manufacturing firms to initiate indirect export marketing.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Required Signed copy of NOC is required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 24
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
User Charges
(l.) NA
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Viswarupa Goldsmith Foundation D.NO.2-183, Sri Balaji Jewellary, Beside Old Madan Bakary, Mutyala Road, Jaggayyapeta Krishna AP-521175
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company registered under companies act 2013
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
NA
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 31st August 2018
(e.) Number of Members 50
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
AOA enclosed Received
(g.) Authorized Share Capital 1000000
(h.) Paid up capital as on............
100000
7
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted Received
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted Received
(k.) SPV specific A/c Opened in Indian Bank --
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to to be highlighted with support documentation
SPV has attended machinery exhibition in Mumbai and Chennai Visited CFC Vijayawada Gold Ornament Cluster Artisans card issued to members Validation Programme done for DPR
(m.) Technical Institution To be appointed after final sanction
(n.) CFC may be utilized by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Enclosed
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
10 HP
(b) Water 500 KLPA
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Andhra Pradesh Trade Promotion Corporation (APTPC)
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
(c.) Implementation Period 12 Months
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Appraisal report received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 70th meeting held on 20.12.19 recommended the proposal to be placed before Steering Committee for consideration and approval subject to submission of requisite documents.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
NA
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 47.63% As per SIDBI, 36.45%
8
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(b.) IRR, Payback period 13.16% As per SIDBI, 14.87% (after tax)
(c.) DSCR NA (No DEBT) --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
28.28% As per SIDBI, 39.46%
(e.) NPV 115.22 As per SIDBI, Rs. 360.56 lakh (+) (before tax)
(f.) DER NA (No DEBT) --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis CFC can withstand 10% drop in Capacity Utilization added with 10% decrease in User charges
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
CFC implemented in Vijayawada Gold Cluster CFC under implementation in Nellore Gold Cluster
6. Proposed project cost is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA Recommended
by SIDBI As per MSE-
CDP
(i) Land and its Development 0.00 4.00 4.00
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 48.00 48.00 48.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification)
671.61 671.61 671.61
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 24.00 5.00 5.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
16.85 31.85 15.36
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
34.54 34.54 34.54
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 5.00 5.00 5.00
Total 800.00 800.00 768.15
7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars % Proposed by
IA Recommended
by SIDBI As per MSE-
CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 640.00 640.00 614.52
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of A.P. 10.00 80.00 80.00 80.00
(iii) SPV contribution 10.00 80.00 80.00 105.48
Total 100.00 800.00 800.00 800.00
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Description No. Amount
1. Sheet & Wire Drawing Machine, Vekaria Brand Model No. HRX-8580 , 2HP 3Phase Motor Auto reversing switch of
1 6.655
9
S. No. Description No. Amount
AMRX7525C-05
2. DIES 2200 Nos - High Grade HSS With Various Models as per Nucleus, Bangles and Rings
2200 156.816
3. DIES 3500 Nos - High Grade Bronze Metal, With Various Models as per Nucleus, Bangles and Rings
3500 190.575
4. Generator - 62 kVA 1 7.744
5. Jewellery Security Safe Locker 2 2.178
6. Laser Marking Machine 1 28.13
7. XRF Machine 2 71.39
8. Assay Balance 1 11.69
9. Sartorius Analytical Balance 1 1.510
10. Sartorius Precision Balance 2 2.060
11. 50Mg. E-2 Class Wire Weight 1 0.070
12. 100Mg. E-2 Class Wire Weight 2 0.150
13. 200Mg. E-2 Class Wire Weight 1 0.070
14. Additional Display attachement 1 0.070
15. Tools & Equipment for sampling 1 9.08
16. Furnaces, Scrubber, Parting Tray ets. 1 10.29
17. Safety Equipment 1 10.29
18. Certfied Reference Material 1 10.41
19. CAD / CAM Centre 1 152.46
Total 671.638
9. Observations: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Signed copy of NOC from State Pollution Control Board. (ii) Details of project specific bank account of Implementing Agency. (iii) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Gold Ornament Cluster, Jaggayyapeta, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs.800.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 614.52 lakh, State contribution of Rs. 80.00 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 105.48 lakh.
*****
10
Agenda No. 54.3.2: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Printing Cluster, Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
Background
Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide letter dated 20.10.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Registered lease deed for land and building in the name of SPV for a period of 30 years.
Provided
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iii) Certificate of SPV formation. Provided (iv) Details of SPV members and their shareholding pattern. Provided (v) Details of SPV’s bank account/ Mandate form. Provided (vi) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Provided (vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units
in the cluster are Micro/ SC/ST/ Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Required
(viii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(ix) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60% of installed capacity.
Provided
(x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Required
(xi) No. of beneficiary units (non SPV members) should be enhanced and list of members to be provided.
Provided
(xii) Commitment letter from Director of Industries, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh regarding State Government’s contribution of 20% of total project cost.
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster Printing Cluster
District East Godavari
Location of Cluster Kakinada
Lok Sabha Constituency Kakinada
Main Product
Business cards Print, Text Books Print, Pamphlets Print, Journals Print, Wedding cards Print, Poster Print, Letter heads Print, Diaries print, Hotel menus Print, Calendars Print, Receipt books Print, ID Cards Print.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro- 150
Turnover for the last five years (Rs in Crore)
2014-15 : 59.82 2015-16 : 64.67
11
2016-17 : 70.31 2017-18 : 78.21 2018-19 : 82.50
Exports for the last five years (Rs in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster 3900 (Direct – 900 & Indirect – 3000)
Technology Details The Cluster Members are using Traditional Methods mostly offset Printing Machinery and Screen Printing Technology, Single/Two colour Printing, Drum type and Plate type Press based Impression Printing Methods.
Whether DS Conducted Yes
Main findings of DSR The cluster units lack modern CTP Processing technology, high resolution Multi colour printers, variable data printing technology, modern finishing and post press machining facilities. There is very little product diversification and value addition taking place due to lack of modern equipment. The cluster products are unable to meet market quality requirements and parameters. The Cluster lack Training facility for upgrading the skills of the cluster entrepreneurs and work force.
Main Problems of Cluster The cluster units modern CTP (Computer to plate) Processing technology. The cluster units high resolution Multi colour printers. The cluster units lack variable data printing technology. The cluster units modern finishing and post press machining
facilities. There is very little product diversification and value addition
taking place due to lack of modern equipment. The cluster products are unable to meet market quality
requirements and parameters. The Cluster lack Training facility for upgrading the skills of
the cluster entrepreneurs and work force.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The progressive printers of today are equipped with the latest computer controlled printing machines and flow lines for binding, while state of the art digital technologies are being used in pre-press. Leading print companies have optimized the use of information technology in each and every area of their business. These printers are today equipped at par with the best print production facilities in the world. A common facility center is very much needed in order to keep up with the changing trends necessary interventions are needed at the base level. If a CFC is established, the cluster units will be tremendously benefited. The original licensed version software at the CFC will only be used for training purpose but also for designing the graphical content with activated and updated tools to satisfy the industrial and training needs of the cluster units. The cluster members who are at present dependent upon customer service kind of market will be able to produce and launch
--
12
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
their own products like diaries, books, labels, calendars etc. as the CFC will be able to provide necessary infrastructure. The CFC will be able to give the cluster members to enhance their market reach.The shortage of skilled workforce that the cluster units faced can be easily overcome with the training facilities which will be able to train the existing workforce and also to the new workforce who could easily be absorbed by the industry. The most important contribution of the CFC to the cluster members is the availability of advanced multi colour and variable data printers, pre-press printing and post press finishing equipment that will boost their production activities and will decrease the critical gaps present in the present process. A common facility center at will help the cluster units tremendously as they will be less dependent on Rajahmundry city leading to increase in revenue as unnecessary expenditure of travelling, transportation, work force diversion will be reduced leading to the overall development of the cluster units. The CFC will help to improve the competitiveness of the cluster members and will provide the strength to the cluster members to compete with larger national and multinational brands and companies
(b.) Location of CFC Kakinada, east Godavari Dist, Andhra Pradesh --
% age of units in radius of 5km
0 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
100 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes, on lease Registered lease deed for land and building in the name of SPV for a period of 30 years received.
ii. Title is in name of SPV
iii. Valuation and its basis -
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use Nil
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
30 years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
5700 sft
(e.) Rate of construction of building
48.75 Lakhs
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Facility Center with computer to Plate Making Facility.
Common Facility Center with high resolution Multi colour offset printer.
Common Facility Center with advance variable printing facility.
Common Facility Center with Post Press
--
13
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
Finishing Machines. Common Facility Center with Marketing and
Display center. Common Raw Material Bank. CFC with Training, and Design facility.
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Computer to Plate CTP can produce 60,000 plates per annum, Multi Colour Offset Printing Single Dummy Setup can print 36000000 prints per annum, Multi Colour Printing Machine Double Dummy Setup can print 9600000 prints per annum, Automatic Paper Cutting can earn revenue of Rs 1,80,000/-,per annum Folding Machine can earn Rs 600000/- per annum ,Gumming Machine can earn Rs 120000/-per annum
--
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
S. No. Particulars Before CFC After CFC (i) No. of units 150 250 (ii) Turnover
(Rs. in crore)
Rs. 82.00 Rs. 110.00 within 3 years of CFC
(iii) Exporting Units
Nil 25 units
(iv) Employment Direct - 900 Indirect - 3000
Direct -1000 Indirect -5000
(v) Others, if any Profit margin of individual units
Low profit margin Improvement in profit margin by 30%
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
SPV will apply for pollution control board for NOC for the proposed activity after in-principle approval.
Received
(j.) Man Power in CFC Total 20 persons consist of Maintenance Engineers, Skilled and supporting staff required for smooth functioning of CFC.
--
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Total revenue generated at 100% utilization is Rs 1023.50 lakhs
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Sri Satyadeva Printing Cluster Association, Kakinada
Received
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Society --
(c.) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
State Govt. and MSME-DI will appoint their officials after final approval of cluster
Required
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 07.09.2019 --
14
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(e.) Number of Members 159 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Submitted Received
(g.) Authorized Share Capital -- --
(h.) Paid up capital as on............ Nil --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal Received
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
submitted Received
(k.) SPV specific A/c SPV will open Bank Account after in-principle approval of proposal
Received
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
SPV has already organized trust building programmes like awareness workshop of CDP, conducted skill development programmes, exposure visits, selection of machinery etc
--
(m.) Technical Institution There are several institutions that are supporting SPV namely Commissioner of Industries, MSME-DI, Vishakhapatnam, DIC, Local Engg. Colleges and Financial institutions Etc
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Undertaking submitted by SPV assuring that 60% capacity of Plant & machinery will be utilized by cluster firms.
Received
(o.) Utilities (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
144.55 KW --
(b) Water 500 lts per day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities -- --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Andhra Pradesh Trade Promotion Corporation (APTPC), Vijayawada
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
(c.) Implementation Period 24 months 24 months from the date of issuance of final approval letter
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted SIDBI appraisal report submitted.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 68th Meeting held on 04.09.19 recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
15
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
The SPV will approach bank after getting in-principle approval
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 43% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period 27% --
(c.) DSCR Not Applicable --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
31% --
(e.) NPV 32% --
(f.) DER Not Applicable --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitive analysis is calculated on decrease in revenue at 5 to 10%, the key financial indicators are economically viable
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Two CFCs viz Gold Ornaments cluster, Vijayawada and Machilipatnam Imitation Jewellery cluster successfully implemented in the state of Andhra Pradesh
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by
IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As
per MSE-CDP (i) Land & Buildings 111.75 111.75 (ii) Plant and Machineries 1245.25 1245.25 (iii) Misc. Fixed Assets 20.00 20.00 (iv) Pre operative expenses 20.00 20.00 (v) Provision for Contingencies 63.60 63.60 (vi) Margin Money 15.40 15.40
Total Project Cost 1476.00 1476.00 7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended
by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Government of India grant 1180.80 1033.20 (ii) State Government contribution 147.60 295.20 (iii) SPV contribution 147.60 147.60
Total 1476.00 1476.00 8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Nos. Total Cost
1. Computer to Plate CTP Machine Setup 1 61.00
16
S. No. Particulars Nos. Total Cost 2. Multi Colour Offset Printing Single Dummy Setup 1 373.92 3. Multi Colour Printing Machine Double Dummy Setup 1 511.68 4. Automatic Paper Cutting Machine, Size 45” 1 28.53 5. Folding Machine 23 x 36 1 27.55 6. Gumming Machine 6 Clamp 1 17.71 7. Lamination Machine 1 7.88 8. 4 Hi Web Double Reel Stand with Quarter Page Folder 1 127.92 9. Digital Offset Machine 1 45.26 10. Sheetfed Offset Machine Double Crown 1 23.62 11. Diesel Generator-200kva 1 14.76 12. Computers, Scanner, Printer 1 5.42
Total 1245.25 9. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/ SC/ST/ Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines. (iii) Inclusion of name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV. (iv) Inclusion of condition in bye-laws that SPV will not eligible for drawing any profit from
operation of the CFC and profit generated during the operation shall be ploughed back for further development of CFC.
(v) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre in Printing Cluster, Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 1476.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1033.20 lakh, State contribution of Rs. 295.20 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 147.60 lakh.
17
Agenda No. 54.3.3: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC)
in Pulses & Pulses Products Cluster, Machavaram Village, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
Background
Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide letter dated 19.11.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Justification for Cold Storage Facility under Plant & Machinery, as pulses does not fall under the category of perishable items.
Provided
(ii) Being Agro-rural based cluster, a time bound & measurable (on year to-year-basis) outcome based road map/Concept Note for backward integration of farmers (cultivating pulses) for their socio-economic upliftment.
Required
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iv) Details of all units in the cluster. Provided (v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Provided (vi) Bye Laws or MoA and AoA. Provided (vii) List of SPV members and details Provided (viii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members. Provided (ix) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution Provided (x) Details of Project specific bank account. Provided (xi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent
of installed capacity. Provided
(xii) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Provided
(xiii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Not required
(xiv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines
Required
(xv) Registered deed documents for land and building in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required)
Provided
(xvi) Document regarding Non Agriculture conversion for change of land use
Provided
(xvii) No. of beneficiary units (non SPV members) should be enhanced and list of members to be provided.
Required
(xviii) Undertakings from State Government as well as SPV that CFC will not sell the products
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster: Pulses and Pulses Products Cluster
District: East Godavari
Location of Cluster: Machavaram
Lok Sabha Constituency: Kakinada
Main Product: Pulses and Pulses Products of different varieties like Red gram (tur dhal), Green gram (mung dhal), Black gram (urad
18
dhal), Bengal gram (chana dhal), (lentil), Toor Dal, Mix Dal Flour for Dosa, Wada, Baby Mix Dal Food Products.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium):
Micro : 119
Turnover for the last five years (Rs in Crore):
Year : Amount 2014-15 Rs.51.91 2015-16 : Rs.57.20 2016-17 : Rs.62.92 2017-18 : Rs.68.40 2018-19 : Rs.770.00
Exports for the last five years (Rs in Crore):
Nil
Employment in Cluster: 2095 Nos. (Direct - 595 & Indirect- 1500)
Technology Details: The cluster members are skilled in pulses processing from their age old experience. At present the cluster members are using traditional methods and semi automatic dal mills of processing capacity ranging from 100 kg to 200 kg per hour and are micro in nature. Lot of advancement has taken place in the processing technology, however the cluster members are economically weak and are dependent on mechanical processing equipments.
Whether DS Conducted: Yes
Main findings of DSR: The cluster lacks a dedicated raw material purchase mechanism.
The cluster is adopting age old technolgies which are hindering the growth of cluster.
The cluster lacks dedicated cold storage centre and warehouse. The cluster products have very huge market and demand but the marketing methodologies adopted are incapable to capture the market for profitability.
The cluster lack grading, sorting and polishing facility as result, proper price tagging of the raw material and processed pulses is difficult.
The cluster lack advance training and R&D / value added product development centre to address the problems faced by the cluster and for developing advance methodologies for sustainability and accelerated growth.
Main Problems of Cluster: Prolonged process. Lack of pulses drying machineries. Lack of fine cleaning and grading facility. Lack of pulses polishing and sorting facility. Poor packaging practices. Testing facility not available in the cluster region. Lack of national market reach, dominance of traders. Lack of storage facilities. Poor value addition and product diversification. Lack of research and training facility.
Other Information: NA
2. Information about Proposed CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The establishment of CFC in the cluster will minimize the wastage and will improve the quality of the pulses. Thus the
--
19
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
project is need based and support worthy.
(b.) Location of CFC The proposed CFC will be established at Machavaram village, Rayavaram Mandal of East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 70 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
30 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Lease, land 1.06 acres. The SPV has taken land and building having 1.06 cents /acres with built-up area of building as 20,000 sq feet on lease for 15.6 years.
ii. Title is in name of SPV
iii. Valuation and its basis Leased building
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use N.A
vi. If on lease, duration of lease 15.6 Years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Land and building has been identified and SPV has undertaken the lease agreement with the owner.
(d.) Total Building area SPV will take the building on lease, total built up area of 20000 sq. ft.
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
N.A. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Automatic Pulses dryers Automatic Fine Cleaning and Size Grading Facility Automatic Color Sorting Facility Automatic Pulses Polishing Machine Common Packaging center with Automatic Pouch and
Bag Packing Machines Common testing facility for Pulses of BIS and FSSAI
Standards Common marketing and Export Centre. Cold Storage Facility. Value Added Product Development Centre Pulses Processing Research & Training Centre
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 20000 Tons per year after CFC setup --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)
S. No.
Particulars Before CFC After CFC
(i) No. of units 119 150 (ii) Turnover
(Rs. in crore)
Rs. 77 crores Rs. 100 crores After 2 to 3 years of CFC
(iii) Exports Nil Direct exports by 5 units
(iv) Employment Direct -595 Indirect -1500
Direct -1000 Indirect -3000
(v) Others, if any Profit margin of
Inconsistent profit margins due to price fluctuations,
Consistent and 20 to 25%
higher profits for producers due to
20
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
individual units
product quality inconsistencies and inefficiencies in production
better quality and price and increased production efficiencies.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not required. Provided
(j.) Man Power in CFC 40 Nos. --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Expected revenue generation at 100% capacity utilization is 952.15 lakh and 85$ capacity utilization is 814.72 lakh.
--
(l.) N.A --
3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Shri Mahalaxmi Pulses Mills Cluster Association. 7-122, Atchutapuram Road, Machavaram, Rayavaram Mandal – 533261.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
The registrar of societies, Kakinada. --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
State Govt. and MSME-DI will appoint their officials after final approval.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 04.08.18 --
(e.) Number of Members 110 Nos. --
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AoA submitted
Submitted Provided
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Equal. --
(h.) Paid up capital as on............ - --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal Provided
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted Provided
(k.) SPV specific A/c SPV will take initiative to open new bank account with nationalized bank after in-principle approval.
Provided
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
SPV has already organized trust building programmes like awareness workshop of CDP, conducted skill development programmes, exposure visits, selection of machinery etc.
--
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should
Undertaking submitted by the SPV assuring that 60% capacity of plant & machinery will be utilized by the cluster
Provided
21
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
firms.
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
Total power of 260 KVA is required for a shift of 8 hrs per day.
--
(b) Water 10000 lts per day and shall be available through borewell.
--
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --
4. Implement Arrangements Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Andhra Pradesh Trade Promotion Corporation (APTPC), Vijayawada.
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Months 24 months from date of issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Submitted
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 68th meeting held on 04.09.19 recommended the proposal to place before the Steering Committee for In-principle approval. (f.) Approval of Technical
Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
The SPV shall approach financial institutions for working capital after in-principle approval of the DPR.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC Description Proposed by Implementation
Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 36% As per SIDBI BEP in optimum year (FY 2026)= 40.57%
(b.) IRR, Payback period 27% As per SIDBI IRR (after tax)= 17.57%
(c.) DSCR NA --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
30% As per SIDBI ROCE in optimum year (FY 2026)= 41.10% Average ROCE= 47.56%
(e.) NPV 29% As per SIDBI NPV (after tax)= Rs. 539.83 lakh (positive)
22
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(f.) DER Not Applicable --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is calculated on decrease in revenue in 5-10%. The key initial indicators are economically viable.
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Particulars Proposed
by IA Recommended by SIDBI/
As per MSE-CDP (i) Land & Building 120.00 120.00 (ii) Plant and Machineries 1244.82 1244.82 (iii) Misc. Fixed Assets 20.00 20.00 (iv) Preliminary & Pre Operative Expenditure 20.00 20.00 (v) Contingencies(2% Building and 5% Machineries) 62.24 62.24 (vi) Margin Value of Working Capital 16.00 16.00
Total 1483.06 1483.06
7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1186.44 1038.14*
(ii) State Government contribution 148.31 296.61
(iii) SPV contribution 148.31 148.31
Total 1483.06 1483.06
*70% of total project of Rs. 1483.06 lakh. 8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Nos. Total Cost
1. Automatic Pulses Cleaning, 1 107.66 2. Automatic Pulses Grading and Dryer 1 115.01 3. Automatic Colour Sorting Machine Setup 2 160.20 4. Automatic Pulses Polishing Machine Setup 1 92.59 5. Automatic Metal Detector Setup 1 32.35 6. Pouch Packing Machine for Pulses 1 45.02 7. Pouch Packing Machine for Pulses 1 54.86 8. Bag Packing Machine for Pulses 1 88.36 9. Cold Storage for Pulses 1 142.69 10. Weigh Bridge 1 14.82 11. Hydraulic Pallets- Hand Operated 4 1.57 12. Full Electric Stacker 2 9.47 13. Weigh Scale Pallet Truck 1 1.17 14. Universal Weighing Scale 1 1.41 15. Bag Unloading System 2 53.35 16. Testing Laboratory Setup - 31.98 17. Breakfast cereal making mixture and Extruder 1 20.48 18. canned curry ready to mix pulses making machine setup 1 17.53 19. Installation Accessories 1 45.33 20. Computers, Windows Software 5 2.77
23
S. No. Particulars Nos. Total Cost 21. Digital Interactive Classroom Board 1 1.80 22. High Resolution Projector with Auto Lock Screen Projector with
Auto Lock Screen 1 0.60
23. Audio System Amplifier, Speakers with Cordless and Podium Mic-set
1 0.65
24. All in One Laser Colour Printer Scanner and Copier 1 0.58 25. Accounting Software-Tally 1 3.51 26. Website and ERP Software Design and Development 1 8.43 27. CCT Camera and DVR and EPABX Intercom setup 1 0.81 28. Fire fighting Equipments-set 1 31.67 29. Air-conditioner A/C
2.0 Ton 2 3.73
30. DG Set 1 17.83 31. Electrical Installations- Transformer, Cables, Control Pannels
with wiring 1 58.12
32. Environmental Section 1 41.62 33. Installation and commissioning cost - 36.90
T0tal 1244.82 9. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines. (ii) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act. (iii) No. of beneficiary units (non SPV members) should be enhanced and list of members. (iv) Being Agro-rural based cluster, a time bound & measurable (on year to-year-basis)
outcome based road map/Concept Note for backward integration of farmers (cultivating pulses) for their socio-economic upliftment.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Pulses & Pulses Products Cluster, Machavaram Village, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 1483.06 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1038.14 lakh, State contribution of Rs. 296.61 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 148.31 lakh.
*****
24
Agenda No. 54.3.4: Proposal for final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park
(Jewellery Park) at Machilipatnam, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. Background
Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide email dated 20.11.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) Letter for enhancement of State Government share to 30% Provided (ii) English version of registered land documents in the name of
Implementing Agency. Provided
(iii) Copy of approved layout plan. Provided
(iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and
above the approved project cost. Provided
(vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Provided
(viii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Provided
(ix) APIIC, Vijayawada should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Andhra Pradesh / APIIC.
Provided
(x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per prescribed format.
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information Name of Organization : Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Andhra Pradesh District : Krishna Industrial Estate : Jewellery Park Machilipatnam (Up-gradation). 2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 89.83 acres Area to be developed (acre) 46.48 acres Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 258
Plot Size (acres.) No. of plots 0 - 0.25 256 0.26 - 0.5 1 1.01 – 3.0 1 Total No. of Plots 258
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
25
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory 3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation (APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada. As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, an undertaking of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, is a premier organization in the state, vested with the objective of providing industrial infrastructure through development of Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones. Over 320 Industrial Parks have been established throughout the State, covering an extent of over 1,30,000 acres.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Submitted
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Jewellery Park is well connected by road, rail, sea and airport with nearest NH – 216 located at 1.5 km North west of the site; the nearest railway station is at Machilipatnam (~ 5 km). The proposed Machilipatnam port is located at about ~ 5 km from the Jewellery Park. Power supply: A 33/11 KV substation is located within the Jewellery Park. Water Supply: Water is being sourced from Municipal water supply connection and also bore wells, water is being supplied through tankers drawing water from summer storage tank.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (APIIC) is already in possession of land required for the up-gradation of all infrastructure facilities.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes Project is for up-gradation.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received from IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
Standard Schedule of Rates – SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
The JP Machilipatnam is expected to generate direct and indirect. The total direct employment is estimated to be about 450. The indirect employment is expected to be about 900. Thus, the estimated total employment potential would be about 1350. The proposed upgradation of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both Direct & in direct) for
Received
26
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks the local people.
Justification of the Proposal The upgradation of infrastructure in the JP, Machilipatnam will facilitate improved functioning of the existing units and setting up of new units in the already allotted vacant lands. Based on the existing profile of JP, Machilipatnam and discussions with the members of JP, Machilipatnam (representatives of Industrial units), an attempt has been made to quantify the expected benefits of the JP.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per
MSE-CDP
1. Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing
93.40 93.40
(ii) Cost of laying roads (internal roads – CC) 165.75 165.75
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
106.83 106.83
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00
(vi) Drainage (Internal) 63.65 63.65
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
105.00 105.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00
Sub Total 564.63 564.63
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative Office Building 21.00 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre
21.00 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 35.00 35.00
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 35.00 35.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00 21.00
27
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per
MSE-CDP
Sub Total 154.00 154.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 75.00 75.00
4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 23.81 23.81
Total 817.44 817.44
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA Recommended by
SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 640.78 572.21* (ii) Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 176.66 245.23
Total 817.44 817.44 *70% of total project cost i.e. Rs. 817.44 lakh. 6. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park (Jewellery Park) at Machilipatnam, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 817.44 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 572.21 lakh and State Government’s contribution of Rs. 245.23 lakh.
*****
28
Agenda No. 54.3.5: Proposal for final approval for up-gradation of Growth Centre at
Hindupur, Anantapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh. Background
Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide email dated 20.11.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Letter for enhancement of State Government share to 30% Provided (ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency. Provided (iii) Copy of approved layout plan. Provided
(iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and
above the approved project cost. Provided
(vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Provided
(viii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Provided
(ix) APIIC, Vijayawada should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Andhra Pradesh / APIIC.
Provided
(x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per prescribed format.
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information Name of Organization : Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Andhra Pradesh District : Ananthapur Industrial Estate : Growth Centre Hindupur (Up-gradation ). 2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 391.21 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 391.21 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 279
Plot Size (acres.) No. of plots 0 - 0.25 138 0.26 - 0.5 73 0.51 - 1.0 37 1.01 - 5.0 23 5.0 and above 8 Total No. of Plots 279
29
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory 3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation (APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada. As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, an undertaking of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, is a premier organization in the state, vested with the objective of providing industrial infrastructure through development of Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones. Over 320 Industrial Parks have been established throughout the State, covering an extent of over 1,30,000 acres.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Submitted
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Growth Centre, Hindupur (HGC) is well connected by road network. Site abuts SH 9 that connects Hindupur and Gauribindanur (Karnataka). NH 44 is at a distance of 40 km east of project site. South central railway line connecting Hindupur and Bangalore cuts across the HGC in north south direction. Nearest railway station is Devarapalli located abutting HGC. Nearest airport to HGC is Kempegowda International Airport at Bangalore located at about 100 km south. Nearest domestic airport is located at Kadapa at about 200 km east of site.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (APIIC) is already in possession of land required for the up-gradation of all infrastructure facilities.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes Project is for up-gradation
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
Standard Schedule of Rates – SSR.
--
30
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Tangible Outcomes of the project
GC Hindupur is expected to generate both direct and indirect employment. The total direct employment is estimated to be is about 300. The indirect employment expected to be created by the HGC would be about 600. Thus, the estimated total employment potential would be about 900. The proposed upgradation of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both direct & in direct) for the local people.
Received
Justification of the Proposal The upgradation of infrastructure in Growth Center, Hindupur will facilitate improved functioning of existing units and would attract new units in the allotted vacant land.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-
CDP
1. Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 81.19 81.19
(ii) Cost of laying roads (roads – CC) 239.28 239.28
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 111.08 0.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 74.78 74.78
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
246.53 115.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00
Sub Total 782.86 540.25
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50 31.50
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 38.50 38.50
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00 21.00
Sub Total 154.00 154.00
3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 28.11 20.82
Total 964.97 715.07
31
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/
As per MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 716.98 500.55* (ii) Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 247.99 214.52
Total 964.97 715.06 *70% of total project cost i.e. Rs. 715.06 lakh. 6. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Growth Centre at Hindupur, Anantapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 715.06 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 500.55 lakh and State Government’s contribution of Rs. 214.52 lakh.
*****
32
Agenda No. 54.3.6: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park
(Autonagar), Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Background
Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide email dated 19.11.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Letter for enhancement of State Government share to 30% Provided (ii) Registered land documents in the name of implementing Agency. Provided (iii) Copy of approved layout plan. Provided
(iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over
and above the approved project cost. Provided
(vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Provided
(viii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Provided
(ix) APIIC, Vijayawada should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Andhra Pradesh / APIIC.
Provided
(x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per prescribed format.
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information Name of Organization : Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Andhra Pradesh District : Guntur. Industrial Estate : Autonagar, Guntur (Up-gradation) 2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan Yes. Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 131.45 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 92.36 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 1424
Plot Size (acres.) No. of plots 0 - 0.25 1424 Total No. of Plots 1424
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
33
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA)
Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, an undertaking of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, is a premier organization in the state, vested with the objective of providing industrial infrastructure through development of Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones. Over 320 Industrial Parks have been established throughout the State, covering an extent of over 1,30,000 acres.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Submitted
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Connectivity: The Autonagar, Guntur (Phase – IV) Industrial Park is well connected by road, rail, sea and airport with NH – 16 abutting the IP on northern side of the site; NH-71 abuts the project site on the Eastern side, the nearest airport is Gannavaram Airport ~ 50 km from project site. The nearest railway station is at Guntur (~ 3 km). Power supply: A 33/11 KV substation is located within the Industrial Park. Water supply: Water is being sourced from borewells connection and to OHT, water is being supplied through tankers drawing water from OHT and individual borewells of units.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (APIIC) is already in possession of land required for the up-gradation of all infrastructure facilities.
Submitted
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes Project is for up-gradation.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
Standard Schedule of Rates – SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
S. No.
Description Before Implementation
of ID Project
After Implementation
of ID Project 1 No. of
Enterprises 666 740
Received
34
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks 2 Employment
(Direct & Indirect)
3100 4220
3 Aggregate investment by units (Rs. in crore)
15.61 17.35
Justification of the Proposal
The upgradation of infrastructure in the AN, Guntur will facilitate improved functioning of the existing units and Expansion of units in the already allotted plots. Based on the existing profile of Autonagar (AN), Guntur and discussions with the members of AN, Guntur (representatives of Industrial units), an attempt has been made to quantify the expected benefits of the AN.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing
96.61 96.61
(ii) Cost of laying roads (roads – CC) 225.00 225.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 127.16 0.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 83.25 83..25
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
236.96 236.96
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00
Sub Total 798.98 671.82
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00 0.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00 0.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50 0.00
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 0.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 35.00 0.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00 0.00
Sub Total 150.50 0.00
3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 28.48 20.15
Total 977.96 691.97
35
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by
IA Recommended by SIDBI/
As per MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 718.85 484.38* (ii) Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 259.11 207.59
Total 977.96 691.97 *70.00% of total project cost i.e. Rs. 691.97 lakh. 6. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of up-gradation of Industrial Park (Autonagar), Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs.691.97 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 484.38 lakh and State Government’s contribution of Rs. 207.59 lakh.
****
36
Agenda No. 54.3.7: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC)
in Maritime Cluster, Verna, South Goa, Goa. Background
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 72nd meetings held on 16.06.2020 and committee recommended the same to place before Steering Committee for final approval.
Vide letter dated 10.07.20 & email dated 16.12.2020 MSME-DI, Goa has forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Appraisal Report of Detailed Project Report (DPR). Copy of Report Received
(ii) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
Copy Received
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Received (iv) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the
escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. Received
(v) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
To be submitted
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Received
(vii) Details of SPV formation in Section-8 of Company Act and MoA and AoA.
Received
(viii) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME-DO Received (ix) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by
IA. To be submitted
(x) Wide publicity to be given. To be submitted (xi) Details of Shareholding Pattern of SPV as per MSE-CDP
Guidelines To be submitted
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster : Maritime Cluster
District : South Goa
Location of Cluster : Verna
Lok Sabha Constituency : South Goa
Main Product :
Bulk Carrier, Fast Patrol Boat, Life Raft and other life - saving appliances, Off Shore Vessel, Passenger Vessel, Tug.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
121 Nos. (Micro : 64 Small :57 Medium : 0)
Turnover(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Year Amount 2013-14 : 94.40 2014-15 : 99.60 2015-16 : 101.30 2016-17 : 102.10 2017-18 : 102.46
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last Year Amount
37
five years :
2013-14 : 0.00 2014-15 : 0.00 2015-16 : 40.00 2016-17 : 30.00 2017-18 : 35.00
Employment in Cluster : Direct Employment- 2800 Indirect Employment- 6000
Technology Details : The technology used by most of the micro units is conventional, the small and large size units have installed some of the advance machines and tools. Individual units lack capacity to invest in advance design analysis software. Physical testing facility available locally have limitations and not conducive for desired industrial outputs while the NABL approved chemical testing facility is not available in Goa and the units have to send their samples out of Goa for testing.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : Inadequate advance design facilities, advance physical testing facilities at affordable rate, training needs to fulfill skilled manpower requirement.
Main Problems of Cluster : 1) Lack of advance design analysis center 2) Lack of advance physical testing facility, chemical testing not available locally 3) Lack of steel cutting facility 4) Lack of shot blasting & priming facility 5) Lack of waste disposal facility 6) Lack of skill development center
Other Information : N/A
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC There is lack of advance machineries like steel cutting facility, shot blasting and priming, industrial waste disposal facility, plate and pipe bending machine, painting booth in the cluster units. At present physical testing facility available locally has limitations and not conducive for desired industrial output and also there is challenge with respect to timely delivery of testing report. NABL approved chemical testing facility is not available locally. Units have to send the samples to Mumbai for chemical testing. This process is time consuming and cost involved in transportation increases the cost of testing, at present there is no common facility center to offer services to the MSEs to meet the challenges of regular cost effectiveness on account of peer pressure from OEMs. The number of MSEs can avail services from CFC to strengthen their value chain analysis and deliver products at competitive rates.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Verna Industrial Estate, South Goa, Goa --
% age of units in radius of 5km
40 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
100 --
38
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired - Received.
ii. Title is in name of NA
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient The offered land is sufficient to set up CFC.
v. Change of land use NA
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
NA
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
NA
(d.) Total Building area(sq mt) Proposed 9000 sq. mt. --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Land Cost Rs 170.00 lakh Building Cost Rs 100.00 lakhs
--
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Shot Blasting & priming facility CNC Steel Cutting machine Plate and pipe bending and rolling
machine Advanced Design Analysis Material and equipment testing facility Industrial waste disposal Painting booth
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Based on 270 working days calculated machinery utilization 70% for common machining and testing facility.
--
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before CFC
After CFC
Units (in Nos)
121 171
Turnover (Rs. in lakh)
10246 13114
Export (Rs. in Lakh)
3500 4025
Employment 2800 nos.
6000 nos.
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes, the pollution control board approval will be taken after allocation of land.
--
(j.) Man Power in CFC 38 based on 70% machine utilization in subsequent years could be seen rise by 25 to 30%.
--
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
1. Year 1 at 70% capacity - INR 664.78 lakhs 2. Year 2 at 80% capacity - INR 759.74 lakhs 3. Year 3 at 90% capacity - INR 854.71 lakhs 4. Year 4 at 100% capacity - INR 949.68 lakhs
--
(l.) NA
3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Konkan Maritime Cluster (erstwhile --
39
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
Western Shipbuilding Private Limited), Shop No S-9, Ground Floor, Sapana Terraces, Swatantra Path, Vasco, South Goa, India 403802.
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Private Limited Company --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Representative of DITC and MSME-DI Goa will be nominated after tripartite agreement
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 05 October 2018 --
(e.) Number of Members 36 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 150 lakhs --
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 2 lakhs --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Given --
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Given --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No. 31466409581 State Bank of India, Panaji, Goa
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
In progress --
(m.) Technical Institution Institute of Shipbuilding Technology --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Given --
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
404 KW --
(b) Water Rs. 0.96 lakhs --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Rs. 78.44 lakhs --
4. Implement Arrangements Description Proposed by Implementation
Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Khadi & Village Industries Board, Goa As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Khadi & Village Industries Board, Goa
(c.) Implementation Period 1 years
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Yet to be appraised (on account of in principal approval from GOI DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for appraisal)
Appraisal report is received.
40
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- Recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC).
(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
NA --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 58.98% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period 17.92% --
(c.) DSCR - --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
12.93% --
(e.) NPV 613.22 --
(f.) DER - --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Base case
Decreasing Sales & job income by
Increasing raw material cost by
Decreasing production cap utilization by
DSCR NA NA NA NA BEP 38.12% 43.13% 38.12% 38.12% Cash BEP
24.48% 27.70% 24.48% 24.48%
ROCE 33.65% 31.54% 40.39% 26.12% IRR (before tax)
22.42% 17.66% 22.42% 13.83%
IRR (before tax)
17.67% 13.80% 17.67% 10.74%
NPV (before tax)
964.61 574.79 964.61 284.51
NPV (After tax)
561.22 269.11 561.22 51.72
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
1 CFC completed --
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended
by SIDBI As per
MSE-CDP
1 Land 170.00 170.00 170.00
41
S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
2 Building 100.00 100.00 100.00
3 Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 1165.00 1165.00 1165.00
4 Misc. Fixed Assets 105.00 105.00 105.00
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 15.00 15.00 15.00
6 Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 60.25 60.25 60.25
7 Margin Money for working capital 6.32 6.32 6.32
Total Project Cost 1621.57 1621.57 1621.57
7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended
by SIDBI As per
MSE-CDP
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1200.00 1200.00 1200.00
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Goa 150.00 150.00 150.00
3 SPV contribution 271.57 271.57 271.57
Total 1621.57 1621.57 1621.57
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S.. No. Description Power Requirement
(HP/KW) Cost
1. Shot Blasting & Printing Plant 350 220.00
2. CNC Steel Cutting Machine with Crane 70 130.00
3. Plate & Pipe Bendign and Rolling Machine 20 550.00
4. Advance Design Analysis Software 100.00
5. Material & Equipment Testing Facility (a) Universal Testing Machine (b) Spectro Meter (c) Hardness Testing (d) Impact Testing Machine
- 50.00
6. Painting Booth - 15.00
7. Industrial Waste Disposal Plant - 100.00
Total - 1165.00
9. Observation: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ii) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by IA. (iii) Original Copy of SIDBI Appraisal Report. (iv) Uploading of SPV members details on MSE-CDP Portal. (v) Clarification on SPV Upfront Contribution (as land is purchased at price of Rs 170.00
lakh on 7 year equal instalment payment basis)
42
(vi) Compliance of all requirements/provisions/columns of online application as per guidelines including conditions imposed by TEAC.
(vii) Submission of shareholding pattern as per MSE-CDP Guidelines 10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Maritime Cluster, Verna, South Goa at a total project cost of Rs.1621.57 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 1200.00 lakh, State Government’s contribution of Rs.150.00 lakh and SPV’s contribution of Rs. 271.57 lakh.
*********
43
Agenda No. 54.3.8: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC)
in Imitation Jewellery Cluster, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. Vide email dated 23.02.2021, Joint Director, MSME-DI, Ahmedabad requested to postponed the inclusion of proposal of Imitation Jewllery Cluster, Ahmedabad in 54th National Level Steering Committee meeting to be held on 02/03/2021.
Background
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 71st meetings held on 06.03.2020 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee for final approval.
Vide letter dated 18.11.20, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India (EDII), Gandhinagar has forwarded the following documents submitted and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum
period of 30 years. To be submitted
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members Submitted (iii) Project Appraisal Report CED Appraised
Report Submitted
(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Submitted (v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Submitted (vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent
of installed capacity. Submitted
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Submitted
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
Submitted
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Submitted
(x) Details of SPVand MoA and AoA Submitted (xi) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME-DO To be
submitted (xii) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by
IA.
To be submitted
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster : Imitation Jewellery Cluster, Ahmedabad
District : Ahmedabad
Location of Cluster : 218-219 Advance Plaza, Sahibaug, Ahmedabad
Lok Sabha Constituency : Ahmedabad
Main Product : Imitation Jewellery Items
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
100 (Micro : 100)
44
Turnover for the last five years Year Amount (Rs in lakh) 2014-15 885 2015-16 985 2016-17 1095 2017-18 1215 2018-19 1350
Exports for the last five years No
Employment in Cluster : 500 Nos.
Technology Details : -Bangle CNC Engraving Machine - Para Engraving CNC Machine - Laser Cutting Machine - Laser Marking Machine - Portable VMC Machine - Turning Machine - Sizing Machine - Tools set for engraving Plant - Training
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : Technology & Quality Up-gradation Machine for Imitation jewellery product manufacturing is being needed in purposed CFC.
Main Problems of Cluster : • Old and traditional designs. • Poor quality and finishing. • Lack of technical awareness. • Artesian do not have formal training. • Wastage and rejection during Manual processes.
Other Information : This is a exclusively for woman entrepreneur cluster engage in manufacturing in imitation Jewellery. The Cluster is for Training of imitation Jewellery as well as common product/process Development.
2. Information about Proposed CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The proposed CFC will help unit located in cluster in improving the quality of the product through standardization of the raw material. Generate Employment Development of new Entrepreneurs.
--
(b.) Location of CFC 218-219 Advance Plaza, Sahibaug, Ahmedabad
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 95 --
% age of units in radius of 10km 5 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered land lease document / Sale deed in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30
ii. Title is in name of Jwellbuzz Imitation Foundation
iii. Valuation and its basis N.A
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use No
vi. If on lease, duration of lease N.A
45
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
vii Whether lease is legally tenable N.A years is required.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 1200 Sq. ft. --
(e.) Rate of construction of building N.A. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed - Bangle CNC Engraving Machine - Para Engraving CNC Machine - Laser Cutting Machine - Laser Marking Machine - Portable VMC Machine - Turning Machine - Sizing Machine - Tools set for engraving Plant - Training
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 11,400 Kg --
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before Intervention
After Intervention
No. of Units 100 275 Production in Kg.
30,000 1,10,000
Turnover (Rs. In Lakhs)
1350 4,400
Employment in No.
500 1,925
Profit (Rs. In Lakhs)
400 1,513
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not As per the notification of Gujarat Pollution Control Board The industries is in the list of exemption provide by GPCB.
--
(j.) Man Power in CFC 14 Nos --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/ user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
- --
3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Jwellbuzz Imitation Foundation 218-219 Advance Plaza, Sahibaug, Ahmedabad
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Section 8 Company --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
S.S. Bhardwaj, Jt. Commissioner, Govt. of Gujarat. P.B. Parmar, Dy. Director, MSME-DI, Ahmedabad
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 17.02.2020 --
(e.) Number of Members 60 Nos. --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA Yes --
46
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
submitted
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Company has currently authorized capital of Rs. 100000/-.
--
(h.) Paid up capital Company has Paid up capital of Rs. 100000/-.
--
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Given --
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution - --
(k.) SPV specific A/c - Required
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
- --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India – EDII, Gandhinagar
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Yes --
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
15 KVA --
(b) Water 1,50,000 Litres --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Available --
4. Implement Arrangements Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India – EDII, Gandhinagar
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India – EDII, Gandhinagar
(c.) Implementation Period 12 Months
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Will be done after the In Principal Approval.
Appraisal report is received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division - --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee - --
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
This is a cluster exclusively operated by Micro Women entrepreneurs. if the cluster is supported the productivity as well as the quality standard of the product will improve waste will be minimize and the costing will be decreased. There is good scope for employment generation.
--
47
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
NA --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP At 31.17% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 20.91% Pay Back Period comes at 4.38 Years
--
(c.) DSCR N.A. --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
26.62% --
(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% Comes Rs. 265.31 Lakhs. --
(f.) DER N.A. --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis As Per Financial Report --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
2 CFC completed, 10 ongoing --
6. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
1 Land - - -
2 Building 50.00 50.00 50.00
3 Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 401.50 401.50 401.50
4 Misc. fixed assets 21.00 21.00 21.00
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 10.00 10.00 10.00
6 Contingencies (3% on TPM) 21.07 21.07 21.07
7 Margin money for working capital 10.00 10.00 10.00
Total Project Cost 513.57 513.57 513.57
7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended
by SIDBI As per MSE-
CDP
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 410.85 410.85 410.85
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Goa 51.36 51.36 51.36
3 SPV contribution 51.36 51.36 51.36
Total 513.57 513.57 513.57
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
S. No. Name of Machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) 1 Bangle CNC Engraving Machine 3 123.90
48
S. No. Name of Machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) 2 Para Engraving CNC Machine 2 35.40 3 Laser Cutting Machine 1 17.70 4 Laser Marking Machine 3 43.40 5 Portable VMC Machine 1 23.60 6 Turning Machine 2 2.40 7 Sizing Machine 1 5.30 8 Tools set for engraving Plant 1 96.80 9 Other Supporting Machinery 1 53.00 Total 401.50
9. Observation: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years. (ii) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME-DO. (iii) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by IA. (iv) Compliance of all requirements/provisions/columns of online application as per
guidelines including conditions imposed by TEAC. (v) Uploading of SPV members details on MSE-CDP Portal.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may defer the proposal.
*********
49
Agenda No. 54.3.9: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Ayurveda Cluster, Karnal District, Haryana. Background:
(i) Proposal was recommended in the 72nd Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 16.06.2020 subject to submission of following documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 16.12.20, MSME-DI, Karnal forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Appraised Report of Detailed Project Report (DPR)
Received
(ii) Registered land document in the name of SPV (In case of leased premises, the lease should be legally tenable in the name of SPV, for a fairly long duration i.e. at least 15 years. In case of leased land, the lease period should be at least for a period of 30 years)
Received
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received (iv) Drug Manufacturing License from State
Government CFC to be setup only to manufacture extracts of herbs to be used for manufacturing of ayurvedic medicines. Licence for extraction of herbs would be obtained after approval and commissioning of P&M in CFC.
(v) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
Received
(vi) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Received
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines
Received
(viii) Certificate of incorporation of SPV in Section-8 of Company Act
Received
(ix) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution
Received
(x) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity
Received
(xi) Mandate form of Implementing Agency regarding project specific bank account in Schedule A Bank.
Required
(xii) Wide publicity of the project Details received. Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Name of the Cluster:- Ayurveda Units Cluster, Karnal District, Haryana 2. Sector:- Ayurveda (Ayush)
50
3. Nature of activity:- Classical Ayurvedic powders (Bhasma), Ayurvedic medicines (tablets, capsules, syrups, eye ear drops), allied products such as Ayurvedic ointments oils, Ayurvedic Nutraceuticals Personal care products (skin care, hair care, oral care, make-up, etc.). Some of the key players in Indian Ayurvedic market include Dabur, Baidyanath Zandu which account for around 80 of the market. In order to promote traditional systems of medicine including Ayurveda, Indian govt. has set up AYUSH ministry 4. Product / Services provided:- Ayurvedic Powder, tablets, capsules, syrup, ointments, eye ear drops, Oils, Ayurvedic Personal Care products 5. Number of units in cluster:- 50 (Micro- 48 & Small-2) 6. Category wise unit in cluster:- Micro-48, Small-2, Women owned-2 7.. No. of SPV member units:- 24 8.. Number of cluster units agreed to join as members of the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV):- There is no ceiling on maximum number of members but should be a min. of 20 MSEs in SPV. However, in special cases where considerations of investments, technology or small size of cluster, 10 MSEs may be considered in SPV) (Micro- 22 & Small-2) 9. Proposed project cost:-
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP/
Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Land 107.50 107.50
(ii) Building & other civil works 289.24 289.24
(iii) Plant & Machinery 949.93 949.93
(iv) Misc. Fixed Assets 17.00 17.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 64.57 28.54
(vi) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on Plant & Machinery)
44.41 44.41
(vii) Margin money for working capital 19.32 19.32
Total 1491.97 1455.94
10. Proposed means of finance:-
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1089.14 1034.88*
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Haryana 253.63 253.63
(iii) SPV contribution 149.20 203.46
Total 1491.97 1491.97
*71.08% of eligible project cost of Rs. 1455.94 lakh.
51
11. Details of Implementing Agency / State Govt./ SPV:- Name of IA: Bureau of Industrial Policy & Promotion
Email of IA: [email protected]
Name of State Govt.: Department of Industries & Commerce, Haryana
Email of State Govt.: [email protected]
Name of SPV & Address: Vapik Solutions, H. No. 7, Nyaypuri, Near Karan Stadium, Karnal-132001, M:- 9416030641
Email: [email protected]
12. Whether share holding pattern of SPV members has been provided? {No single unit should hold more than 10 percent in the equity capital (or equivalent capital contribution) of the SPV}
S. No. Name of Unit Contribution of unit towards SPV Share
(Rs. in lakh)
% of unit share
1 Comex Herbal Products 2.98 2.00
2 Xieon Life Sciences Private Limited 10.44 7.00
3 Reach Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd 4.47 3.00
4 Ayushi Herbs 5.97 4.00
5 Uttam Herbals 5.97 4.00
6 Sukhija Ayurvedic Pharmacy 5.97 4.00
7 Cure Quick Herbals 2.98 2.00
8 Gourja Foods and Agro Products 5.97 4.00
9 Anant Herbal Products 8.95 6.00
10 Stallion Enterprises 10.44 7.00
11 Daksh Pharmaceuticals 5.97 4.00
12 Vet Health Pharma 5.97 4.00
13 And Pharma Co. 5.97 4.00
14 Binexo Pharmaceuticals 5.97 4.00
15 North India Life sciences Pvt. Ltd 10.44 7.00
16 Avikaa Herbs 4.47 3.00
17 Swiss Bioherbals 2.98 2.00
18 K.R Laboratory 5.97 4.00
19 PMG Healthcare 4.47 3.00
20 Sarthak Ayush and Foods 4.47 3.00
21 Liberty Drugs Gram Udyog Samiti 4.47 3.00
22 Exod Herbals 5.97 4.00
23 Sahi Pharma India Pvt. Limited 5.97 4.00
24 Onika Pharmaceuticals 7.46 5.00
52
11. How many cluster units, other than SPV members, are willing to utilize the services of CFC.
(a) Micro (b) Small (c) Medium
22 2 00
12. Main finding and critical gap identified Yes Absence of nearby standardized herbal extraction plant Absence of centralized Formulation Development (FD) facility Absence of Quality testing lab 13. Whether all the problems of the cluster have been addressed i.e. information on nature of critical gaps identified? Yes The details of all the problems given in the page no. 58 and 59 of the Detailed Project Report of the Cluster. Please refer that pages. 14. Activity/Process at UNIT/CFC level
SN Activity/Process at unit level Activity/Process at CFC level
1
One of the key problems that Ayurveda units in Karnal face is the availability of standardized quality raw materials APIs with assured delivery timelines. Currently Karnal Ayurveda Units procure herb
Setting up of an herbal extraction plant in Karnal will lead to easy availability of standardized raw materials to Ayurveda units in Karnal and nearby districts. Standardized raw materials will help for
2
There is an absence of quality testing lab for testing of raw material finished products. Several laws governing the pharma industry require various tests to be conducted by the pharma units. The units
Setting up of a Quality Control Lab cum RD Centre will help to ensure a certain level of standardization and also provide RD facilities for new formulations development by Ayurveda units in Karnal and
15. Is there any possibility with the proposed machinery to perform complete activities to manufacture a product (some activities are supposed to be performed at CFC level as well as Unit level, in such a case it would be a complete and independent manufacturing unit and cannot be a part of CFC). No 16. Tangible outcomes (No. of unit, Employment Turnover & Export)
Description Before Intervention of CFC After Intervention of CFC
No. of cluster units (Numbers) 50 80
Cluster Turnover (Rs. in crore) 50 100
Employment (Numbers) 2500 4500
Export (Rs. in lakh) 0 20
53
17. Is there any proposed activity for CFC which is being performed in cluster units? If yes, how many units are there and what is its production capacity (with due justification)? No 18. Is there any adverse effect on existing cluster units due to proposed CFC? If yes, up to what extant? No 19. Whether the proposed activities in CFC are technically feasible and viable? Backward linkages (like raw material availability etc.) and forward linkages (gap between production capacity of the cluster and particular proposed activity of CFC) may be judged. Yes 20. Whether proposed machinery for CFC is advanced (at present) and adequate to fulfill the existing & near future needs of the cluster? Yes 21. Whether SPV members will be able to utilize 60% of proposed production capacity of CFC (justification if necessary)? Yes 22. Whether similar facilities (as proposed) are available in public or private sector in nearby area? No 23. Whether Technical viability, user charges and cost of machinery are ascertained? Yes
24. Proposed faculties:
Herbal Extraction Plant In-process quality control lab cum R&D centre
25. List of Plant & Machinery (a) Primary Machines:
S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount
(Rs. in lakh) A.1 First Phase Grinding & Crushing of Herbs
1 Herbs Washing Machine 1 3.80
2 RM Grinder (Pre-Crusher) 1 9.20
3 RM Grinder (Pre-Crusher) 1 6.80
A.2 Extraction
4 Rotary Extractor 2 40.00
5 Vertical Extractor 3 40.00
6 Vertical Extractor 4 50.00
7 Vertical Extractor 4 30.00
54
S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh)
8 Open Extractor 2 10.00
9 Open Extractor 2 9.00
A.3 Concentration (Distillation)
10 Reactor 2 28.00
11 Reactor 2 25.00
12 Reactor 3 30.00
13 Reactor 2 16.00
14 Callandria Unit 2 25.00
15 Distillation Vessel 1 11.20
16 Distillation Vessel 2 11.20
A.4 Accessories for Extractors & Reactors
17 Condenser 4 17.00
18 Condenser 6 21.00
19 Condenser 6 19.00
20 Condenser 6 17.00
21 Vacuum Receivers- 20 23.00
22 Vacuum Receiver - 2 4.50
23 Transfer Pumps 10 6.00
A.5 Sedimentation & Day Storage
24 Settling Tank 4 12.60
25 Settling Tank 2 4.20
26 Day Storage Tank 2 11.20
A.6 Filtration
27 Centrifuge 1 8.40
28 Centrifuge 1 7.40
29 Filter Press 1 3.80
30 Filter Press 1 6.50
A.7 Drying Section
31 Rotary Vacuum Padle Dryer 1 22.00
32 Tray Dryer 1 7.00
33 Spray Dryer with structure 1 40.00
34 Nutch Filters 1 1.40
35 Nutch Filters 1 1.90
A.8 Solvent Storage Section
31 Horizontal Underground Storage Tank 2 12.50
32 Horizontal Underground Storage Tank 1 5.00
A.9 Final Processing
33 Ribbon Blender 1 4.50
34 Double Cone Blender 1 8.00
35 Multi Mill 1 2.00
36 Vibro Sifter 1 1.40
37 Vibro Sifter 1 1.10
55
S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh)
38 Impact Pulveriser 1 10.50
Total 624.10
Add: Packing/Transportation @ 1.5% of base price 7.93
Grand Total 632.03
(b) Secondary Machines:
S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh)
1 Steam Boiler with Chimney 3TPH 1 48
3 RO Plant (2000 LPH) 1 8.50 4 ETP Plant 1 13.00
5 Cooling Tower (250 TR) 1 6.50
6 Pipelines for Utilities 30.00 7 Vacuum Pump (10HP) 2 4.20
8 Mini Workshop for Maintenance (Lathe Machine, Driller, Tools, Welding Set)
1 9.11
9 Pilot Plant for R&D (2*500 L) 2 30
10 DG Set 125 KV 2 15.00 11 Weighing Machine 1 8.00
12 Batch Coding Machine 1 3.00
13 Powder Pouch Packing Machine 1 5.00 14 Liquid Pouch Packing Machine 1 4.50
15 Weigh Balance (500 KG) 1 0.40 16 Weigh Balance (300 KG) 1 0.40 17 Weigh Balance (100 KG) 2 0.20 18 SS/MS Racks 50 9.00
19 Platforms for entire plant 26.90 20 Computers 4 1.2 21 Office Aluminium Panels 5.81
22 Lift for first floor for material 10.05 23 Cargo lift with small tractor 9.55
Total 248.31 Add: Packing/Transportation @ 1.5% of base price (except Computers) 2.82
Grand Total 251.13
(c) Lab Equipments: S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount
(Rs. in lakh) 1 UV Spectrophotometer Double Beam 1 5.90 2 Polari meter 1 0.48 3 Refractometer 1 0.27 4 TLC Kit 1 0.32
5 Hot Air Owen 1 0.44 6 Muffle Furnace 1200 Degrees 1 0.38
56
S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh)
7 Round Bottom Flask 1 0.01 8 Heating Mental 1 0.04 9 Heating Mental 1 0.03
10 Digital Water Bath 1 0.27 11 Melting Point Apparatus 1 0.20 12 Vortex Shaker 1 0.24 13 Desiccator Borosil 1 0.18 14 Mono Quartz Water Distillation Unit 1 0.55 15 Laboratory Glass Dryer 1 0.32 16 Microprocessor Conductivity TDS meter 1 0.27 17 T.D.S. Meter PEN type 1 0.05 18 Alcohol meter 1 0.06 19 Test Sieve Standard Size 1 0.03 20 Test Sieve Standard Size 1 0.03
21 Test Sieve Standard Size 1 0.03 22 Magnetic Stirrer with Hot Plate 1 0.12 23 T.L.C. Plate (Merck) 1 0.06 24 Whitman Filter Paper 1 0.01 25 Ordinary Filter Paper 1 0.00 26 Thermometer 1 0.01
27 Thermometer 1 0.01 28 Incubator Bacteriological SS Chamber Inside 1 0.41
29 BOD Incubator 1 0.65 30 Microscope Binocular 1 0.27 31 Autoclave Vertical 1 0.38 32 Vacuum Oven 1 0.33 33 Stability Chamber 1 4.37 34 Lab Glass ware 1 2.66
35 Lab Furniture with Centre Table and PVC Sink Fitting with electric fitting
1 3.25
36 Lab Chemicals 1 2.66 37 TRACE GC 1110 Main Frame 230V 1 10.27 38 HPLC with Auto sampler and UV Detector 1 24.49
Total 60.00 Add: Packing/Transportation @ 1.5% of base price 0.76
Grand Total 60.76
Total Plant & Machinery Cost
S. No. Particulars Price (Rs. in lakh)
1. Primary Machines 624.10
2. Secondary Machines 248.31
3. Lab Equipment 60.00
57
S. No. Particulars Price (Rs. in lakh)
4. Packing & Transportation 11.52
5. Erection & Commissioning 6.00
Total 949.93
25. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Drug Manufacturing License from State Government (ii) Mandate form of Implementing Agency regarding project specific bank account in
Schedule A Bank
26. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Ayurveda Cluster, Karnal District, Haryana at a total project cost of Rs. 1491.97 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1034.88 lakh, Government of Haryana contribution of Rs. 253.63 lakh and SPV’s contribution of Rs. 203.46 lakh.
*****
58
Agenda No. 54.3.10: Proposal for Final approval for upgradation of Industrial Estate (Rubber
Park) at Irapuram, District - Ernakulam, Kerala.
Background
(i) Proposal was recommended by the 71st Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 06.03.20, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to Approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 11.11.20, Managing Director, Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development
Corporation, Thiruvananthapuram has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status
(i) English version of registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency vetted by MSME-DI, Thrissur.
Received.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan Received. (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received. (iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over
and above the approved project cost Received.
(v) Status of completed ID Projects in the State and details of operating units in the Rubber Park project in prescribed format.
Received.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received.
(vii) IA should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete with proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Kerala / KINFRA.
Document awaited.
(viii) Economic Viability Report on the proposal from MSME-DI Received. (ix) Cost of land filing and levelling should be funded by State Share. Document
awaited. (x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of
component-wise cost estimates of project cost as per provided format. Received.
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (KINFRA).
State : Kerala
District : Ernakulam
Industrial Estate : Up-gradation of Infrastructure Facilities (Rubber Park)
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
110 acres
59
Particulars Description
Area to be developed (acre) 76.01 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
Total 42 plots have been allotted to units. Out of which 38 units are operational in the area.
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Infrastructure Development (ID) Projects: Completed Projects: 08 On-going Projects:03
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (KINFRA), Thiruvananthapuram.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA KINFRA has pioneered the concept of Theme-Based Industrial Parks in Kerala for kick-starting development, particularly in industrial sectors where the state has an edge by way of natural and human resources. This resulted in a significant contribution to inculcate an industry culture and encouraged many leading industries to set up their factories and manufacturing facilities in KINFRA parks. It has created the much needed impetus for the industrial promotion in Kerala. KINFRA has established 22 well-defined industrial parks spread across around 3000 acres of land and several new projects are in the launching phase. Each of these Parks offers comprehensive infrastructure and support services to the clients.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted. Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes. The site of existing industrial area is well connected with major roads: 6 kms to SH 1, 4 kms to SH 41, 10 kms to NH 49 and 25 kms to NH 66. The park is 20 kms away from Kochi international Airport and Aluva Railway station and 35 kms away from the Kochi Port. There is adequate supply of water and power and telecom facilities are also available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
The IA has submitted the copy of land patta certifying that the land is under possession of KINFRA.
Received.
60
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Existing Industrial Estate.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
- Received.
Basis of elements of project Cost
KINFRA has certify that the estimate prepared for the upgradation of facilities at Rubber Park India Pvt., Irapuram (a joint venture of KINFRA and Rubber board of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry) is prepared as per CPWD guidelines.
Received.
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Particulars Present status Expected Outcome No. of units 42 (39 MSME
units) Increase in 14-18 rubber based MSME units & Capacity enhancement of existing units.
Employment 600 Increase in 300-400 employees.
Justification of the Proposal The proposed project is for development of existing industrial area at Rubber park, Irapuram, District – Ernakulam. The basic infrastructure facilities were completed in 2003, but the infrastructure has deteriorated with time. The roads are in poor condition, there is inadequate water supply, lack of storm drains, inadequate common ETP plant, poor street lighting and outdated testing and certification centre. Accordingly, road strengthening, street lighting upgradation, common ETP augmentation, water supply augmentation and upgradation of testing & certification centre are envisaged in the project.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Revised project Cost by IA as per SIDBI appraisal
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended
by SIDBI
1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling / leveling / including boundary wall / fencing
0.00 0.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 293.61 293.61
(iii) Roadside greenery and social forestry 0.00 0.00
61
S.No. Particulars Revised project Cost by IA as per SIDBI appraisal
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended
by SIDBI
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks & pump house.
262.00 262.00
(v) Water harvesting 0.00 0.00
(vi) Drainage (internal) 0.00 0.00
(vii) Power (Substation & distribution network including streetlight etc.). Generation of non-conventional energy
67.39 67.39
(viii) Others (sanitary conveniences etc.) (upgradation of infrastructure)
0.00 0.00
Sub Total 623.00 623.00
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative Office Building 0.00 0.00
(ii) Telecommunication / Cyber Centre / Documentation Centre
43.00 43.00
(iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition Centre 0.00 0.00
(iv) Bank / Post Office 0.00 0.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 0.00 0.00
(vi) First Aid, crèche, canteen etc. 0.00 0.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 305.00 305.00
4. Contingencies & Preoperative Expenses 0.00 0.00
Total 971.00 971.00
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 60.00 582.60
(ii) Implementing Agency 40.00 388.40
Total 100.00 971.00
6. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for Final approval for upgradation of Industrial Estate (Rubber Park) at Irapuram, District - Ernakulam, Kerala at a total project cost of Rs. 971.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 582.60 lakh & Implementing Agency of Rs. 388.40 lakh . .
*****
62
Agenda No. 54.3.11: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre in Engineering Cluster, Govindpura, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.
Background
Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th SCM held on 25.07.18 subject to submission of following documents prior to final approval.
Vide letters dated 26.06.19, 16.10.19 & 02.12.19, Government of Madhya Pradesh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV. Provided (ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report of revised DPR with plant and machinery as
recommended by Technical Committee, to be vetted by MSME-DI, Indore before SIDBI appraisal.
Provided
(iii) List of share holding pattern of SPV members. Provided (iv) Details of SPV's Bank account. Not
submitted (v) Commitment letter from SPV for contribution of its share. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of
installed capacity. Provided
(vii) Details of production capacity of cluster. Provided (viii) Details of Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance
of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export / domestic sales and direct / indirect employment etc.).
Provided
(ix) NOC from Pollution Control Board. Not submitted
(x) Details of Revenue generation mechanism. Provided (xi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC
guidelines. Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster: Engineering Cluster
District: Bhopal
Location of Cluster: Bhopal
Lok Sabha Constituency: Bhopal
Main Product: Fabricated and Precision Machined Components
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium):
Micro 10 Small 32
Turnover for the last five years (Rs in Crore):
2016-17 4.158 2017-18 5.94 2018-19 6.72 2019-20 7.46 2020-21 8.53
Exports for the last five years (Rs in Crore):
Nil
Employment in Cluster: 3000
Technology Details: Upgrading the production technology at a moderate speed
Whether DS Conducted: Yes
Main findings of DSR: Diagnostics study proposes setting up of common facility
63
center in terms of high end design and development/training center and production cum training center apart from a row material bank and a test lab.
Main Problems of Cluster: Gaps as per chart
Other Information: Executive summary
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC Cluster Map --
(b.) Location of CFC Govindpura Industrial Area Bhopal --
% age of units in radius of 5km
80 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
60 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired M.P. Govt. allotted as their contribution
Received
ii. Title is in name of Govindpura Engineering Cluster
iii. Valuation and its basis 1.5 crores as per collector guideline
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use Not required at Industrial Area
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Yes, 30 years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 13774.50 sq ft --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
1000 per sq ft aprox --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Machining facility Test lab Training facilities Raw material bank
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 1,75,80,000/- per annum Received
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment etc.)
4,15,80,000/- per annum Received
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
N/A Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 21 --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
As per commercial analysis Received
64
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Govindpura Engineering Cluster Foundation, Govindpura Industries Association Complex, Ground Floor, Industrial Area, Govindpura Bhopal M.P. 462023
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
1. Industries Commissioner 2. Director, msme, Indore
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 12.09.2012 --
(e.) Number of Members 43 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital 1,00,000/- --
(h.) Paid up capital as on............
1,00,000/- --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted Received
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted Received
(k.) SPV specific A/c 7184002100000304 Required
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
-- --
(m.) Technical Institution -- --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Submitted Received
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
150 KWA --
(b) Water 20,000 liters --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 20 liters oil --
65
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam Limited, Bhopal
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
(c.) Implementation Period 2 years --
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Submitted
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Technical Committee of MSE-CDP in its meeting held on 13.07.18 recommended the proposal.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 31% As per SIDBI, 50.36%
(b.) IRR, Payback period 10.02% As per SIDBI, 11.72%
(c.) DSCR 3.83 As per SIDBI, 4.41
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
12.38 As per SIDBI, 26.59%
(e.) NPV 10% As per SIDBI , 750.80 (+NPV)
(f.) DER 0.13 --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Enclosed --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
02 CFCs approved and under implementation under MSE-CDP.
6. Proposed project cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/MSE-CDP
(i) Land and its Development 150.00 150.00
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 250.00 250.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 980.00 980.00
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 75.00 60.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
10.00 10.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
34.40 61.00
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 51.69 20.10
Total 1551.09 1531.10
66
7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/MSE-CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1045.00 1017.00
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of M.P. 150.00 150.00
(iii) SPV contribution 176.09 184.10
(iv) Bank Loan/others 180.00 180.00
Total 1551.09 1531.10
8. Plant & Machinery:-
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Name of the
Machinery Qty. Rate Total
Amount Taxes Total
Amount A. Training Center Machineries
1 Asada Bend SAW Beaver 1 190,500 190,500 27,623 218,123 2 Chain Pipe Wrench
Forged 1 3,100 3,100 450 3,550
3 ID Cold Pipe Beveling Machine
1 333,000 333,000 48,285 381,285
4 Hydraulic Pipe Bender with
1 13,600 13,600 1,972 15,572
5 Portable Reinforcement
1 45,000 45,000 6,525 51,525
6 Power Tube Notcher 1 150,000 150,000 21,750 171,750 7 Tapping Machine 1 18,200 18,200 2,639 20,839 8 Hydraulic Hand Pallet
Truck 1 29,500 29,500 4,278 33,778
9 Hydraulic Crimping Piler
1 22,799 22,799 3,306 26,105
10 Polisher/Waxer 1 4,299 4,299 623 4,922 11 CNC Wire Cut
EDM Machine 1 2,072,000 2,072,000 300,440 2,372,440
12 JV 45 Vertical Machining Centre Complete with
1 4,213,000 4,213,000 610,885 4,823,885
13 SMAW 4 60,000 240,000 34,800 274,800 14 SMAW 4 25,000 100,000 14,500 114,500 15 GTAW 2 150,000 300,000 43,500 343,500 16 GMAW 2 139,000 278,000 40,310 318,310 17 GMAW 3 80,000 240,000 34,800 274,800 18 SAW 1 370,000 370,000 53,650 423,650 19 Hypertherm
machine plasma 1 303,000 303,000 43,935 346,935
20 Fumes extraction system complete
1 525,000 525,000 76,125 601,125
21 Arc welding booth with all
3 100,000 300,000 43,500 343,500
22 Gas welding booth with all accessories
3 100,000 300,000 43,500 343,500
23 Welding transformer 5 14,800 74,000 10,730 84,730 24 Fire extinguishers 4 4,950 19,800 2,871 22,671 25 Messer Germany
make proficut cutting torch with
1 4,848 4,848 703 5,551
26 Messer Germany 1 1,170 1,170 170 1,340
67
S. No. Name of the Machinery
Qty. Rate Total Amount
Taxes Total Amount
make gas mixing curved gauging
27 Messer Germany make gas mixing straight
1 1,170 1,170 170 1,340
28 Heavy duty cylinder pressure regulator with outlet single
1 5,299 5,299 768 6,067
29 Tronado 300 regulator - high flow 0-250m3/hr.20
1 16,390 16,390 2,377 18,767
30 Regulator end DGN fulelH
1 2,399 2,399 348 2,747
31 Torch end GG fule GLH
1 1,499 1,499 217 1,716
32 Starlight 1302 MB handle multipurpose , heating insert for above handle HF
1 11,998 11,998 1,740 13,738
33 Star heating torch star handle with heating insert
1 15,498 15,498 2,247 17,745
34 Gas economizer it discontinues the supply of oxygen and fule gas to the torch is placed on the hook during the interval between operation the flame does not require re- setting on resuming operation
1 9,990 9,990 1,449 11,439
35 Product machine with 1 injector cutting torch for gas acetylene with circle cutting attachment& rail track with interlocking section, length 1200
1 108,240 108,240 15,695 123,935
36 Airtherm LPG heating torch
1 5,300 5,300 769 6,069
37 Electrode holder 25 285 7,125 1,033 8,158 38 Cable connector 500
amp 50 462 23,100 3,350 26,450
39 Earth clamp 400amp 25 183 4,575 663 5,238 40 Chipping hammer 280mm
length chipping hammer with wire brush
30 300 9,000 1,305 10,305
41 Welding gloves 80821303
10 243 2,430 352 2,782
42 Single Girder EOT crane make "MDI" Set Complete with "MDI" make Wire Rope Electric Hoist cap. 10 Ton x 6 Meter lift Capacity 10 Ton x 15 Meter Span x 6 Meter Heigth of Lift
2 689480 1378960 389556 1768516
43 Single Girder EOT crane make "MDI" Set Complete with "MDI" make Wire Rope Electric Hoist cap. 5 Ton x 6 Meter lift Capacity 5 Ton x 15 Meter Span x
2 543330 1086660 306980 1393640
B. CNC Processing Center Machineries
68
S. No. Name of the Machinery
Qty. Rate Total Amount
Taxes Total Amount
1 CNC Terrablade 1 2,090,000 2,090,000 303,050 2,393,050 2 Cnc laser cutting
machine 1 37,396,32
0 37,396,320 0 37,396,320
3 Pinacho conventional lathe machine
1 824,528 824,528 0 824,528
4 Sipcon coordinate measuring machine*
1 3,300,000 3,300,000 0 3,300,000
5 Argo make vertical turret milling machine
1 672,032 672,032 0 672,032
6 Sipcon profile projector
1 686,500 686,500 0 686,500
7 Sipoc vision measuring system
1 904,250 904,250 0 904,250
8 3D CNC co-ordinate measuring machine*
1 5,027,700 5,027,700 0 5,027,700
9 Accucraft 500 pro rapid prototyping machine
1 456,000 456,000 9,120 465,120
10 Robot Welding 1 6,112,610 6,112,610 886,328 6,998,938 C. Testing Lab Machineries
1 Fine Make Computerised Universal Testing Machine With Front Open
1 932,000 932,000 18,640 950,640
2 Fine Make Computerised Universal Testing Machine With Front Open
1 1,142,000 1,142,000 22,840 1,164,840
3 Digital Display Microhardness
1 751,600 751,600 15,032 766,632
4 Digital Rockwell Cum Brinell
1 206,000 206,000 4,120 210,120
5 Vickers Cum Brinell Hardness
1 208,000 208,000 4,160 212,160
6 Computerized Brinell Hardness Testing Machine
1 462,000 462,000 9,240 471,240
7 Impact Testing Machine
1 128,000 128,000 2,560 130,560
8 Astm Impact Testing Machine
1 252,400 252,400 5,048 257,448
9 Belec Lab 3000c 1 1,818,045 1,818,045 36,361 1,854,406 10 Option Sub Program 1 44,671 44,671 893 45,565 11 Additional Base Module ;3
Ci,Ai,Cu@1970 Ea. 1 422,413 422,413 8,448 430,861
12 Special Spark Generator
1 95,204 95,204 1,904 97,108
13 Extra Element Channel 1 53,606 53,606 1,072 54,678 14 Special Optic To Analyse
Nitrogen Leb3000c(From .05%)
1 321,634 321,634 6,433 328,067
15 Special Optic To Analyse Nitrogen Leb3000c(From 0.002%)
1 607,531 607,531 12,151 619,682
16 Automatic Argon Shu- Off System
1 32,163 32,163 643 32,807
17 X-RAY PLATING THINKNESS MEASURING INS.
1 2,533,268 2,533,268 50,665 2,583,934
69
S. No. Name of the Machinery
Qty. Rate Total Amount
Taxes Total Amount
18 Salt Spray/ Corrosion Test Chamber
1 736,875 736,875 14,738 751,613
D. LIST OF SOFTWARES 1 Siemens Solid
Edge Academic Bundle 10 30,000 300,000 43,500 343,500
2 Siemens Nx Academic Bundle
6 225,000 1,350,000 195,750 1,545,750
3 Siemens Nx Cam Express Academic
10 50,000 500,000 72,500 572,500
4 Altair Hyperworks (Hypermesh, Hyperform)
6 200,000 1,200,000 174,000 1,374,000
3,350,000 485,750 3,835,750 Insurance @ 1% of E 885078
Freight cost @ 2% of E 1770156 PACKING / FORWARDING CHARGES @ .............. 0.2% 177015 INSTALLATION , ERECTION AND COMMISIONING M/C @ 7.5% 6638091 Total Estimated project cost of Plant and Machineries with all
compliances charges 97978223 Say
9. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) Details of SPV’s Bank account. (ii) NOC from Pollution Control Board. (iii) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre in Engineering Cluster, Govindpura, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 1531.10 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1017.00 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs.150.00 lakh, SPV contribution of Rs. 184.10 lakh & Bank loan of Rs. 180.00 lakh.
70
Agenda No. 54.3.12: Proposal for final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at
Sanawad District Khargaone, Madhya Pradesh. Background
Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 47th Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 25.07.18 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide letter dated 16.06.20, Directorate of Industries, Government of Madhya Pradesh forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by Competent
Authority. Provided
(iii) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Industries Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned.
(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format to be provided by Office of DC (MSME).
Provided
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd
State : : Madhya Pradesh
District : : Khargaone (W.N.)
Industrial Estate : : Agro Based Cluster Sanawad District Khargone
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of Industrial Estate (acre) 22.30
Area to be developed (acre) 18.58
Number and sizes of plots to be developed 67 plots of assorted sizes
71
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
No Projects
Performance of ID projects in State 12 projects have been completed and 02 are under implementation.
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Limited, Indore
--
Track Record of the IA M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam (MPLUN) is a Government of M. P. Undertaking established in the year 1961, the Nigam is constantly implementing the State Government's policies for development of SSI sector.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
SIDBI appraisal has been sought and will be submitted after in-principal approval of the proposal
--
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The proposed site is situated on State Highway No. 27 in Sanawad. Sanawad is a town in Khargone District
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land is under possession of MSME Department. The layout plan has been prepared and shall be provided once approved.
Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Industries Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
The State has already implemented similar ID projects in the past and has all the monitoring institutions in place
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
IA has already provisioned investment
--
Basis of elements of project Cost
As per MSE-CDP guidelines --
72
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Infrastructure development for ago based cluster in Sanawad dist. Khargone
--
Justification of the Proposal Khargone is one of the major agro producing districts of Madhya Pradesh. Agro Product & food product recorded positive growth. There is a new demand by the agro industries for infrastructure which is being proposed.
--
4. Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
99.00 99.00
(ii) Laying roads 220.00 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery and social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
85.32 85.32
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00
(vi) Drainage 60.00 60.00
(vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc.
229.74 229.74
(viii) Other (Sanitary convenience etc) 10.00 10.00
(ix) Administrative and Other Services Complex, Telecommunication/cyber/document center/conference hall/exhibition hall
61.71 61.71
(x) Bank/Post Office 18.00 18.00
(xi) Raw material storage/marketing outlet 44.00 40.00
(xii) First aid center, crèche, canteen 18.00 18.00
(xiii) Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00 80.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 23.06 20.00
Total 968.83 941.77
5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP: 565.06 565.06
(ii) State Government 313.77 313.77
73
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(iii) Equity from MPLUN 90.00 90.00
Total 968.83 968.83
*60% of total project cost i.e. Rs. 941.77 lakh. 6. Observations: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval.
(i) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency. 7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Sanawad, District Khargaone, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 968.83 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 565.06 lakh, State Government’s contribution of Rs. 313.77 lakh and MPLUN contribution of Rs.90.00 lakh.
*****
74
Agenda No. 54.3.13: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at
Kachnaria Village, Tehsil Biaora, District Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh. Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th meeting of Steering Committee held on 25.07.18, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 06.0620, Directorate of Industries, Government of Madhya Pradesh has
submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval: Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI appraisal report. Provided. (ii) Approved Layout Plan signed by Competent
Authority. Provided.
(iii) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency.
Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Industries Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned.
(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided.
(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format to be provided by Office of DC(MSME).
Provided.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Provided.
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd
State : Madhya Pradesh
District : Rajgarh
Industrial Estate : Food Processing Industrial Cluster at Kachnaria, Rajgarh
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 49.48
Area to be developed (acre) 17.32
Number and sizes of plots to be developed 59 new industrial plots of various sizes.
75
Particulars Description
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
No projects
Performance of ID projects in State 12 projects have been completed and 02 are under implementation.
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) MPLUN Ltd, Bhopal
Track Record of the IA M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam (MPLUN) is a Government of M. P. Undertaking established in the year 1961, the Nigam is constantly implementing the State Government's policies for development of SSI sector.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report
SIDBI appraisal report submitted. Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The proposed site is 5 Km. away from the Biaora town and well connected with National Highway Road No. 3.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land is under possession of DTIC Rajgarh. Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Industries Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with
Yes
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
The State has already implemented similar ID projects in the past and has all the monitoring institutions in place
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
IA has already provisioned investment Provided.
Basis of elements of project Cost estimates have been signed by General --
76
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Cost Manager (E&C) of H.O. M. P. Laghu Udyog Nigam Limited, Bhopal on the basis of component-wise project cost.
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Infrastructure for new industrial area --
Justification of the Proposal Rajgarh is one of the major food producing districts of Madhya Pradesh. There is a new demand by the food industries for infrastructure which is being proposed.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of Site Development and Land Filling / Levelling / Boundary wall
91.86 91.86
(ii) Cost of laying roads 200.00 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery and social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses and tube wells
110.45 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00
(vi) Drainage 60.00 60.00
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
226.98 226.98
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00
2. Administrative and other services complex
(i) Administrative Office Building / Incubation centre building
69.96
69.96 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/
Documentation Centre
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 18.00 18.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets `
44.00 40.00
77
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities
18.00 18.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00 80.00
4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 22.96 20.00
Total 972.21 964.80
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 578.88 578.88*
(ii) Grant from State Government 356.33 356.33
(iii) Equity from MPLUN 37.00 37.00
Total 972.21 972.21
* GoI grant of Rs. 578.88 lakh is 60% of total eligible project cost of Rs.964.80 lakh 6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency i.e. M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd., Bhopal with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Kachnaria Village, Tehsil Biaora, District Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 972.21 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 578.88 lakh and equity from MPLUN is Rs. 37.00 lakh.
*****
78
Agenda No. 54.3.14: Proposal for final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at
Choradongari Village, District Betul, Madhya Pradesh Background
Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 47th Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 25.07.18 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide letter dated 06.06.20, Directorate of Industries, Government of Madhya Pradesh forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by Competent
Authority. Provided
(iii) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Industries Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned.
(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format to be provided by Office of DC (MSME).
Provided
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd
State : Madhya Pradesh
District : Betul
Industrial Estate : Electrical and Mechanical Cluster at Chordongari, Betul
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 18.38
79
Particulars Description
Area to be developed (acre) 15.22
Number and sizes of plots to be developed 70 of assorted size
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
No Projects
Performance of ID projects in State 12 projects have been completed and 02 are under implementation.
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) MP Laghu Udyog Ltd, Bhopal --
Track Record of the IA M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam (MPLUN) is a Government of M. P. Undertaking established in the year 1961, the Nigam is constantly implementing the State Government's policies for development of SSI sector.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report
SIDBI appraisal has been sought and will be submitted after in-principal approval
Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Choradongri village, Ghoradongri, Betul and well connected with National Highway No.59
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land is under possession of DTIC Betul
Land document in the name of Implementing Agency is required
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes (already converted industrial land)
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
The State has already implemented similar ID projects in the past and has all the monitoring
Constituted
80
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
institutions in place
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
IA has already provisioned investment
Received.
Basis of elements of project Cost As per MSE-CDP guidelines --
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Industrial development for electrical and mechanical engineering cluster
--
Justification of the Proposal The proposed area is well known by the presence of two of the biggest industries in Madhya Pradesh: a Thermal Power Plant which has the capacity of 4000 MW and is considered to be one of the biggest plant in Madhya Pradesh and Western Coal Field which is also situated within the proximity of the proposed site.
--
4. Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Revised Estimated by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing:
100.00 100.00
(ii) Road side greenery and social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iii) Laying roads 220.00 200.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
104.21 104.21
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00
(vi) Drainage 60.00 60.00
(vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc.
236.16 236.16
(viii) Other (Sanitary convenience etc) 10.00 10.00
(ix) Administrative and Other Services Complex, Telecommunication/cyber/document center/conference hall/exhibition hall
69.50 69.50
81
S. No. Particulars Revised Estimated by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(x) Bank/Post Office 18.00 18.00
(xi) Raw material storage/marketing outlet 44.00 40.00
(xii) First aid center, crèche, canteen 18.00 18.00
(xiii) Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00 80.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses :
23.90 20.00
Total 1003.77 975.87
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 600.00 585.52*
(ii) Grant from State Government 400.00 291.68
(iii) Equity from MPLUN 126.57 126.57
Total 1126.57 1003.77
* GoI grant of Rs. 585.52 lakh is 58.55% of total eligible project cost of Rs.1000.00 lakh 6. Observations: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval.
(i) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Choradongari Village, District Betul, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs.1003.77 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.585.52 lakh, State Government’s contribution of Rs.291.68 lakh and MPLUN contribution of Rs.126.57 lakh.
*****
82
Agenda No. 54.3.15: Proposal for final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Akodi Village, Teh Waraseoni, District Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh.
Background
Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 47th Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 25.07.18 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide letter dated 06.06.20 & email dated 18.12.20, Government of Madhya Pradesh forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI appraisal report Provided (ii) Approved Layout Plan signed by Competent
Authority Provided
(iii) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency
Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Industries Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned.
(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Provided
(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State Provided
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd
State : Madhya Pradesh
District : : Balaghat
Industrial Estate : : Akodi Lac Industrial Cluster
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 22.44
Area to be developed (acre) 14.82
Number and sizes of plots to be developed 32
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
No projects
83
Performance of ID projects in State 12 projects have been completed and 02 are under implementation.
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA)
MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Limited, Indore --
Track Record of the IA M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam (MPLUN) is a Government of M. P. Undertaking established in the year 1961, the Nigam is constantly implementing the State Government's policies for development of SSI sector.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Submitted
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
6 kms from Balaghat town; on State highway 26
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land is under possession of DTIC Balaghat Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Industries Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
yes
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
The State has already implemented similar ID projects in the past and has all the monitoring institutions in place
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
IA has already provisioned investment Submitted
Basis of elements of project Cost
As per MSE-CDP guidelines --
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Infrastructure development for lac cluster --
Justification of the Balaghat is one of the major lac producing --
84
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Proposal districts of Madhya Pradesh. "Kusmi" lac recorded positive growth. There is a new demand by the lac industries for infrastructure which is being proposed.
4. Proposed project cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Revised cost proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
5.47 101.23 100.00
(ii) Laying roads 477.46 252.99 200.00
(iii) Construction of foot paths 76.81 0.00 0.00
(iv) Road side greenery & social forestry 15.03 10.00 10.00
(v) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
78.86 93.97 93.97
(vi) Water harvesting 0.00 10.00 10.00
(vii) Construction of Storm Drainage Network
54.25 60.00 60.00
(viii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc.
186.08 227.09 227.09
(ix) Administrative and Other Services Complex
55.79 148.63 144.63
(x) Effluent Treatment Facilities 92.74 80.00 80.00
(xi) Construction of other utilities 10.75 0.00 0.00
(xii) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses
31.59 24.24 20.00
(xiii) Other (Escalation, Supervision, GST) 267.47 10.00 10.00
Total 1352.30 1018.15 955.69
5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Revised cost proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 600.00 573.41 573.41
85
(ii) State Government contribution/ 752.30 444.74 444.74
Total 1352.30 1018.15 1018.15
* GoI grant of Rs. 573.41 lakh is 60.00% of total eligible project cost of Rs.955.69 lakh 6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval.
(i) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency. 7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Akodi Village, Teh Waraseoni, District Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 1018.15 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 573.41 lakh and State Government’s contribution of Rs. 444.74 lakh.
*****
86
Agenda No. 54.3.16: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at Imphal East District, Manipur.
Background
(i) Proposal was recommended by the 71st Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 06.03.20, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to Approval.
(ii)Vide email dated 20.12.20, Managing Director, Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status
(i) Appraisal Report Received. (ii) Registered land documents in the name of
Implementing Agency i.e. MANIDCO with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines, the land should be in the name of the Implementing Agency (IA) with Clear Title and complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal.
(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Received.
(iv) MANIDCO should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Manipur / MANIDCO.
Undertaking not received.
(v) Cost of land filing and levelling should be funded by State Share.
Undertaking not received.
(vi) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of component-wise cost estimates of project cost as per provided format.
Not received.
(vii) Estimates of the civil works should be counter signed by CPWD.
Not received.
Details of the proposal are as under:
87
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Directorate of Commerce & Industries, Manipur
State : Manipur
District : Imphal East
Industrial Estate : New Industrial Estate at Imphal East,Manipur
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan received or not
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 13.12
Area to be developed (acre) 7.00
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
63 plots with size of 2400 sqft (60 ft length x 40 ft breadth) will be developed in the new industrial estate.
Implementing period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
Nil.
Performance of ID projects in State 6 ID projects completed
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA The implementing agency has a good track record of taking up major infrastructural projects in the state.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted. Received.
Whether sufficient Yes. All the basic facilities are available --
88
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
at project site. Details are provided below: (i) The site of Imhal East Industrial
Estate at Sajeb is located approximately 7.0 kms of capital city of Imphal.
(ii) The distance from the site to the nearest National Highway No. 202 is far by approximately 4.5 km.
(iii) The source of water for Imphal East at Sajeb may be drawn from two resources: (a) Iril river. (b) The Department of Public
Health and Engineering Department (PHED).
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes, Yes, land proposed for the project has been taken by MANIDCO on lease for a period of 25 years from Department of Trade, Commerce & Industries, Govt. of Manipur commencing from 25th October 2018.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines, the land should be in the name of the Implementing Agency (IA) with Clear Title and complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes. Received.
89
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
State level committee has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes, Escalation (if any) in the project cost shall be met by State Govt. / IA.
Received.
Basis of elements of project cost
The cost estimates as per general abstract of civil works of all components in the project cost as mentioned in the DPR has been prepared on the basis of Manipur Schedule of Rates (MSR), 2017.
Required.
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Particulars Before intervention
After intervention
Total area to be developed
Nil 7.00 acres out of a total of 13.12 acres.
No. of plots to be developed
Nil 63 plots to be developed with size of 60 ft. x 40 ft. for each plot.
No. of plots to be allotted to MSEs.
Nil 55 plots
No. of plots to be allotted to industries other than MSEs.
Nil 8 plots.
Employment expected to be generated
Nil Direct employment - 600. Indirect employment-1000.
Justification of the Proposal
The development of the new industrial estate will help in providing a concrete infrastructure for all the units coming up in the industrial estate. Also, it will provide direct / indirect employment opportunities to approximately 1600 people.
--
90
4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/levelling including
boundary wall /fencing 118.59 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 210.54 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.64 9.64 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks,
and pump houses 110.87 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.03 10.00 (vi) Drainage (Internal) 69.28 60.00 (vii) Power (Substation & distribution
network including streetlight etc.). Generation of non-conventional energy.
249.92 249.92
(viii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 9.89 9.89 Sub Total 788.76 749.45
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative Office Building 32.00 20.00 (ii) Documentation centre 32.00 20.00 (iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition Center 34.29 30.00 (iv) Bank / Post Office 24.62 20.00 (v) Raw Material Storage Facility,
Marketing Outlets 47.82 40.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen Facility
25.00 20.00
Sub Total 195.73 150.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.24 80.00 4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 20.00 20.00 Total 1084.73 999.45
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 799.56* (ii) State Govt. / IA contribution 284.73 285.17
Total 1084.73 1084.73 * GoI grant of Rs. 799.56 lakh is 80% of total eligible project cost of Rs.999.45 lakh.
91
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) As per MSE-CDP guidelines, the land should be in the name of the Implementing Agency (IA) with Clear Title and complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal.
(ii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of component-wise cost estimates of project cost as per provided format.
(iii) Estimates of the civil works should be counter signed by CPWD. (iv) MANIDCO should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Manipur / MANIDCO. Undertaking from State Govt./IA may be submitted.
(v) Cost of land filing and levelling should be funded by State Share. Undertaking from State Govt./IA may be submitted.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at Imphal East District, Manipur at a total project cost of Rs. 1084.73 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 799.56 lakh and State Government contribution /IA is Rs. 285.17 lakh.
*****
92
Agenda No. 54.3.17: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at Katomei, Senapati District, Manipur.
Background
(i) Proposal was recommended by the 71st Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 06.03.20, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to Approval.
(ii) Vide email dated 20.12.20, Managing Director, Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status (i) Appraisal Report. Received. (ii) Registered land documents in the
name of Implementing Agency i.e. MANIDCO with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines, the land should be in the name of the Implementing Agency (IA) with Clear Title and complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal.
(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Received.
(iv) MANIDCO should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Manipur / MANIDCO.
Undertaking not received.
(v) Cost of land filing and levelling should be funded by State Share.
Undertaking not received.
(vi) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of component-wise cost estimates of project cost as per provided format.
Not received.
(vii) Estimates of the civil works should be counter signed by CPWD.
Not received.
Details of the proposal are as under:
93
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited
State : Manipur
District : Senapati
Industrial Estate : New Industrial Estate at Katomei, Senapati District,Manipur
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan received or not
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 10.00
Area to be developed (acre) 7.00
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
60 plots with size of 2400 sq. ft. (60 ft. length x 40 ft. breadth) will be developed in the new industrial estate.
Implementing period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
Nil.
Performance of ID projects in State 6 ID projects completed.
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA)
Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA The implementing agency has a good track record of taking up major infrastructural projects in the state.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted. Received.
94
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes. All the basic facilities are available at project site. Details are provided below: The site of Senapati Industrial Estate at
Katomei is located approximately 62 kms of capital city of Imphal along national Highway No. 2. The distance from the site to the nearest National Highway No. 2 is far by approximately 20 km.
The source of water for Senapati Industrial Estate at Katomei may be drawn from two resources:
Senapati river. The Department of Public Health and
Engineering Department (PHED).
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes, land proposed for the project has been taken by MANIDCO on lease for a period of 25 years from Department of Trade, Commerce & Industries, Govt. of Manipur commencing from 25th October 2018.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines, the land should be in the name of the Implementing Agency (IA) with Clear Title and complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion
Yes. Received.
95
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
etc complied with)
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
State level committee has been constituted. Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Submitted. Received.
Basis of elements of project cost
The cost estimates as per general abstract of civil works of all components in the project cost as mentioned in the DPR has been prepared on the basis of Manipur Schedule of Rates (MSR), 2017.
Required.
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Particulars Before intervention
After intervention
Total area to be developed
Nil 7.00 acres out of a total of 10 acres.
No. of plots to be developed
Nil 60 plots to be developed with size of 60 ft. x 40 ft. for each plot.
No. of plots to be allotted to MSEs.
Nil 55 plots
No. of plots to be allotted to industries other than MSEs.
Nil 5 plots.
Employment expected to be generated
Nil Direct employment - 600. Indirect employment-1000.
Justification of the Proposal
The development of the new industrial estate will help in providing a concrete infrastructure for all the units coming up in the industrial estate. Also, it will provide direct / indirect employment opportunities to approximately 1600 people.
--
96
4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary
wall /fencing 143.72 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 210.54 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.64 9.64 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and
pump houses 110.87 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.03 10.00 (vi) Drainage (Internal) 69.28 60.00 (vii) Power (Substation & distribution network
including streetlight etc.). Generation of non-conventional energy
249.92 249.92
(viii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 9.89 9.89 Sub Total 813.89 749.45
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative Office Building 32.00 20.00 (ii) Telecommunication/ Documentation
centre/Cyber Centre 32.00 20.00
(iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition Center 34.29 30.00 (iv) Bank / Post Office 24.62 20.00 (v) Raw Material Storage Facility, Marketing
Outlets 47.82 40.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen Facility 25.00 20.00 Sub Total 195.73 150.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.24 80.00 4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 20.00 20.00
Total 1109.86 999.45 5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No.
Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 799.56* (ii) State Govt. / IA contribution 309.86 310.30
Total 1109.86 1109.86 * GoI grant of Rs. 799.56 lakh is 80% of total eligible project cost of Rs.999.45 lakh.
97
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) As per MSE-CDP guidelines, the land should be in the name of the Implementing Agency (IA) with Clear Title and complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal.
(ii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of component-wise cost estimates of project cost as per provided format.
(iii) Estimates of the civil works should be counter signed by CPWD. (iv) MANIDCO should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Manipur / MANIDCO. Undertaking from State Govt./IA may be submitted.
(v) Cost of land filing and levelling should be funded by State Share. Undertaking from State Govt./IA may be submitted.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at Katomei, Senapati District, Manipur at a total project cost of Rs. 1109.86 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 799.56 lakh and State Government contribution /IA is Rs. 310.30 lakh.
*****
98
Agenda No. 54.3.18: Proposal for final approval for up-gradation of Angargadia
Industrial Estate at Balasore District, Odisha Background
(i) Proposal was recommended in the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 20.12.19 subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 18.08.20 from MSME-DI, Cuttack has submitted the documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval: S. No. Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI appraisal report. Received (ii) English version of registered land documents
Received
(iii) Copy of approved layout plan Received (iv) Commitment letter from State Government / Implementing
Agency to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(v) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(vii) Cost of land filling & levelling should be met from State share. Received (viii) Undertaking from IA regarding basis of estimates of component
costs as per format provided. Received
(ix) State Government/IA should consider enhancement of their contribution.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(IDCO)
State : Odisha
District : Balasore
Industrial Estate : Industrial Estate at Angargadia (Up-gradation).
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan received or not
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 30.47
Area to be developed (acre) 30.47
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
Currently there are around 80 manufacturing units in Industrial Estate Angargadia.
Implementing Period 24 months
99
Particulars Description
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
One ID project at Somnathpur, District Balasore completed under MSE-CDP during 2006.
Performance of ID projects in State 3 ID projects completed
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (IDCO).
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
SIDBI appraisal yet to be done. Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Balasore Railway station is around 3 km and Kharagpur Railway Station railway station is around 130 km from IE, Angargadia. The industrial estate Angargadia is very adjacent NH 16 within 100 m distance. National Highway 16 (NH 16) is a major National Highway in India, that runs along east coast of West Bengal, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. It was previously known as National Highway 5. Bhubaneswar International Airport is around 198 km from Industrial Estate Angargadia. Airport is well connected to cities like Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Vizag, Kerala, Amritsar, Goa etc.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land is in possession and in the name of IDCO with clear title.
English version of registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
Cost estimates have been made by internal engineering wing of IDCO.
--
100
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Upgradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear which will lead to economic gains, better transport will lead to more connectivity, proper drainage system will lead to no water logging during rains, connectivity from industry to main drainage system will lead to better system.
--
Justification of the proposal This DPR proposes upgradation of the IE, Angargadia with components such as roads, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. This industrial estate was last developed in the year 2008. But with time infrastructure has deteriorated. Industries are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Drains constructed, are also completely damaged, which is causing water stagnation within the industrial estate.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No.
Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary
wall and fencing 102.62 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 208.00 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.52 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump
houses 78.22 78.22
(v) Water harvesting 9.84 9.84 (vi) Drainage 95.62 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work
including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy
106.50 106.50
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 12.91 10.00 2. Administrative and other services complex (i) Administrative Office Building 29.32 20.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation
Centre 20.20 20.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 20.79 20.79 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 22.00 20.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets ` 42.00 40.00 (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 22.00 20.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 0.00 4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 20.00 20.00
Total 800.54 735.35
101
5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No.
Particulars Proposed by IA
As per SIDBI / MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 588.28 514.74 (64.30%) (ii) State Government / IA 212.26 285.80 (35.70%)
Total 800.54 800.54 (100%) *SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 514.74 lakh as 64.30% of eligible project cost of Rs. 735.35 lakh. 6. Observations: Following document is required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines 7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Angargadia Industrial Estate at Balasore District, Odisha at a total project cost of Rs. 800.54 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 514.74 lakh and Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (OSIC), Cuttack contribution of Rs. 285.80 lakh.
*****
102
Agenda No. 54.3.19: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Chandaka Industrial
Estate (Phase 1) at Khordha, Odisha. Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 20.12.19, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 19.08.20, MSME-DI, Cuttack has submitted the following documents and
requested to consider the proposal for final approval: Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (ii) Copy of approved layout plan. Not clear in DPR. (iii) Commitment letter from State
Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Received.
(iv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Not received.
(v) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Required from State Government.
(vi) Cost of land filling & leveling should be met from State share.
Received
(vii) Undertaking from IA regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(IDCO)
State : Odisha
District : Khordha
Industrial Estate : Industrial Estate at Chandaka (Up-gradation)
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan received or not
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 939.720 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 100 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed Total 572 units are operational in the area.
103
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
No other ID project is sanctioned till date.
Performance of ID projects in State 3 ID projects completed
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (IDCO).
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
SIDBI appraisal report submitted. Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes. All the basic facilities are available at project site. Khordha railway station if 13.5 km and Bhubaneswar railway station is 13.3 km from IE, Chandaka. IE, Chandaka is 9 km away from NH-16.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land is in possession and in the name of IDCO with clear title.
Received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Cost estimates have been made by Chief General Manager (P&C) of IDCO on the basis of Odisha Schedule Rate (OSR) – 2014 (revised GST).
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Upgradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear which will lead to economic gains, better transport will lead to more connectivity, proper drainage system will lead to no
--
104
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
water logging during rains, connectivity from industry to main drainage system will lead to better system.
Justification of the proposal This DPR proposes upgradation of the IE, Chandaka with components such as roads, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. This industrial estate was last developed in the year 1982. But with time infrastructure has deteriorated. Industries are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Drains constructed, are also completely damaged, which is causing water stagnation within the industrial estate.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure (i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall
and fencing: 91.91 91.91
(ii) Laying roads 208.00 208.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 12.75 12.75 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and
pump houses 106.32 106.32
(v) Water harvesting 13.21 13.21 (vi) Drainage 95.00 95.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work
work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy
247.00 247.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 18.05 18.05 2. Administrative and other services complex (i) Administrative Office Building 22.94 22.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/
Documentation Centre 20.29 20.29
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 32.00 32.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 20.00 20.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets
` 41.00 41.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 22.00 22.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 0.00 4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 20.00 20.00 Total 970.47 969.53
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 724.18 724.18 (ii) State Government / IA 246.29 246.29
Total 970.47 970.47
105
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Copy of approved layout plan. (ii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines. (iii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate
are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Chandaka Industrial Estate (Phase 1) at Khordha, Odisha at a total project cost of Rs. 970.47 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 724.18 lakh, State Government/IA contribution of Rs. 246.29 lakh.
*****
106
Agenda No. 54.3.20: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Pradeep, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 20.12.19, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 19.08.20, MSME-DI, Cuttack has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status (i) Registered land documents in the name of
Implementing Agency (IA). Land document is not clearly visible in the DPR. Registered land document is required.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan. Not received. (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (iv) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to
meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received.
(v) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Not received.
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Required from State Government.
(vii) Cost of land filling & leveling should be met from State share.
Received
(viii) Undertaking from IA regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(IDCO)
State : Odisha
District : Jagatsinghpur
Industrial Estate : Industrial Estate at Paradeep (Up-gradation).
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan received or not
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 37.01 Acres
Area to be developed (acre) 37.01 Acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
Total 35 units are operational in the area.
107
Particulars Description
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
No other ID project is sanctioned till date.
Performance of ID projects in State 3 ID projects completed
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (IDCO).
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
SIDBI appraisal report submitted. Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Paradeep railway station is 7.1 km from IE,Paradeep NH 53 is in close proximity to IE, Paradeep. Sufficient quantity of water is available and is provided to existing industrial units at IE, Paradeep.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land is in possession and in the name of IDCO with clear title.
Required
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Cost estimates have been made by Chief General Manager (P&C) of IDCO on the basis of Odisha Schedule Rate (OSR) – 2014 (revised GST).
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Upgradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear which will lead to economic gains, better transport will lead to more connectivity,
--
108
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
proper drainage system will lead to no water logging during rains, connectivity from industry to main drainage system will lead to better system.
Justification of the proposal This DPR proposes upgradation of the IE, Paradeep with components such as roads, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. This industrial estate was initially developed in the year 1975. But with time infrastructure has deteriorated. Industries are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Drains constructed, are also completely damaged, which is causing water stagnation within the industrial estate.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI
1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure (i) Land filling/levelling including
boundary wall and fencing: 99.97 99.97
(ii) Laying roads 171.54 171.54 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 4.74 4.74 (iv) Water supply including overhead
tanks, and pump houses 106.51 106.51
(v) Water harvesting 9.85 9.85 (vi) Drainage 77.62 77.62 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution
net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy
106.50 106.50
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 13.20 13.20 2. Administrative and other services complex (i) Administrative Office Building 17.40 17.40 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 86.05 86.05 4. Contingencies & Pre operative
expenses . 20.00 20.00
Total 713.38 713.38 5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No.
Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 480.56 480.56 (ii) State Government /IA 232.82 232.82
Total 713.38 713.38
109
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency (IA). (ii) Copy of approved layout plan. (iii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines. (iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate
are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Pradeep, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha at a total project cost of Rs. 713.38 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 480.56 lakh, State Government/IA contribution of Rs. 232.82 lakh.
*****
110
Agenda No. 54.3.21: Proposal for final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack, Odisha.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 50th SCM held on 12.02.2019 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 12.08.20 from Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (OSIC), Cuttack has submitted the documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
S. No. Documents required Status (i) As agreed upon by State Government, letter regarding
enhancement of State share to 30%. Received
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency
To be submitted
(iii) Copy of approved Layout plan. To be submitted
(iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (v) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to
meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines
To be submitted
(vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are micro.
To be submitted
(viii) IDCO should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Odisha / IDCO
Received
(ix) Cost of land filing & levelling should be funded by State share
Received
(x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(IDCO)
State : Odisha
District : Cuttack
Industrial Estate : IE, Jagatpur
111
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 343.00 Acres
Area to be developed (acre) 343.00 Acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
There are around 475 units operating within the Industrial Estate.
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
No other ID project is sanctioned till date.
Performance of ID projects in State 3 ID projects completed
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (IDCO).
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
SIDBI appraisal yet to be done. Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Cuttack Railway station is around 6.8km and Manguli- Chowdwar Railway station is around 6 km from Jagatpur IE. IE, Jagatpur is 200m away from NH-16. Sufficient quantity of water is available and is provided to existing industrial units at IE, Jagatpur.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land is in possession and in the name of IDCO with clear title.
Required
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
112
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Basis of elements of project Cost
Cost estimates have been made by internal engineering wing of IDCO.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Upgradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear which will lead to economic gains, better transport will lead to more connectivity, proper drainage system will lead to no water logging during rains, connectivity from industry to main drainage system will lead to better system.
--
Justification of the proposal This DPR proposes upgradation of the IE, Jagatpur with components such as roads, drainage complex etc. This industrial estate was last developed in the year 2008. But with time infrastructure has deteriorated. Industries are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Drains constructed, are also completely damaged, which is causing water stagnation within the industrial estate.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
96.55 96.55
(ii) Laying roads 201.46 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 14.90 10.00 (iv) Rain water Harvesting Structures 7.10 7.10 (v) Drainage 61.25 60.00 (vi) Power distribution, Street light
arrangements, etc. 245.50 245.50
(vii) Toilets, Sanitary, Conveniences 12.77 10.00 (viii) Administrative and Other Services Complex 20.18 20.00 (ix) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre 20.28 20.00 (x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 27.44 27.44 (xi) First aid centre,Creche Canteen 24.87 20.00 (xii) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 14.65 14.65
Total 746.95 731.24 5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/
As per MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 590.38 511.87 (ii) State Government 156.57 235.08
Total 746.95 746.95 *SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 511.87 lakh as 68.52% of eligible project cost of Rs. 746.95 lakh.
113
6. Observations: Following document is required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency (ii) Copy of approved Layout plan. (iii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines (iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate
are micro.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack, Odisha at a total project cost of Rs. 746.95 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 511.87 lakh and Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (OSIC), Cuttack contribution of Rs.235.08 lakh.
*****
114
Agenda No. 54.3.22: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Sewing Machine Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab.
Background:
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 04.08.20, Government of Punjab submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Registered land documents with clear title in the name of SPV Received (ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received (iv) Copy of Article of Association & Memorandum of Association Received (v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution Received (vi) Details of shareholding pattern Received (vii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60
percent of installed capacity Received
(viii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Received
(ix) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC-ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be
Received
(x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster : Sewing Machine Cluster District : Ludhiana Location of Cluster : Village Doburji, VPO-Raul, Tehsil-Payal Lok Sabha Constituency : Ludhiana Main Product : Sewing machine body, its stand and various parts. No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Units : No. Micro : 91 Small : 11 Total : 102
Turnover for the last five years (Rs in Crore) :
Year Amount 2013-14 : Rs. 7.90 2014-15 : Rs. 8.40 2015-16 : Rs. 9.10 2016-17 : Rs. 8.70 2017-18 : Rs. 9.50
Exports for the last five years (Rs in Crore):
Year Amount 2013-14 : Rs. 0.60 2014-15 : Rs. 0.70 2015-16 : Rs. 0.90 2016-17 : Rs. 0.75 2017-18 : Rs. 1.00
Employment in Cluster : 6000 Technology Details : Conventional Whether DS Conducted : Yes Main findings of DSR : A state of the art Centre needs to be created which will have
115
advanced technologies such as Automatic Casting Plant, VMC 5 Axis, HMC, CNC Turning, Automatic Powder Coating Plant, Automatic Painting Plant, Vacuum Hardening Machine, CNC Robo Drill, CNC Wire Cut, Automatic Machine Hardness Tester, Spectrometer Calibration, Lab Chemical and Metal Testing Lab, CAD/CAM Software, 3D Scanner etc.;
Installation of Non Conventional Energy Generation Equipments like Solar Power Plant etc.;
Establishment of lab and research & development which will have spectroscope, UTM, impact testing machine, polishing machine etc.
In order to train the workers on 5S, 3M & Kaizens, use of 7QC tools for non conformity control, Pokayoke (Fool Proofing), inventory control, productivity (OEE) improvement etc. for skill development. Training Centre needs to be developed.
Main Problems of Cluster : No facilities of Tool Room with latest machines, calibration and testing lab service and training on design software/ designing of components/ dies/ jigs & fixtures in Ludhiana for Sewing Machine Industry. Due to which, the units are not able to produce good quality products to meet the requirements of Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and other customers abroad.
Non-availability design facilities, units are not able to design new components or products marketable in Global Market. Hence, there is a need to establish Common Facility Centre at Ludhiana.
Currently, cost of manufacturing the Industrial Sewing Machines are quite higher in India and these are being imported from China, Japan and Taiwan.
By installing this plant, unit holders will be able to manufacture sewing machines at a reasonable cost and it will also serve the dream of Make in India initiative by Hon’ble Prime Minister.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Justification for CFC The proposed Common Facility Centre in this cluster will result in technological advancement in terms of development of International Standard Sewing Machines and Industrial Sewing Machines, which is in huge demand and is financially beneficial as compared to domestic Sewing Machine in Ludhiana. Imports will be reduced and quality of the machines will be improved.
There is a need for CFC, which will offer following facilities: Job work of casting through high
pressure unit, machining of the component, paint
Tool Room with Latest Machinery Design Centre for Designing and
Training Calibration & Testing Lab
--
116
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
Services etc. The machines being planned for the
CFC will be of high value and the building for such type of machinery is comprehensive and invites huge financial outlay, which is not possible by any individual catering to Sewing Machine market (comprising of majority of micro enterprises). In this case, CFC will serve the purpose.
(b.) Location of CFC VPO Daburji Tehsil Payal Ludhiana. -- % age of units in radius of 5km
20 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
25 --
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Received ii. Title is in name of Sewing Machine Technology Park
(Regd.) iii. Valuation and its basis 60.00 lakh (Market price including stamp
charges) iv. Land is sufficient Yes -- v. Change of land use To be taken after purchase of land -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Not applicable --
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Not applicable --
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 43560 sq. ft -- (e.) Rate of construction of building
83.00 lakh --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Casting of sewing machine body and other components.
Machining of sewing machine body and its parts.
Paint/ Powder sewing machine and its parts.
Research & Development of New Sewing Machine Model.
Tool Room with latest machinery. Calibration & Testing lab services.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Casting - 720000 kg per annum, Machine Process - 45600 hours per annum, Paint/Powder Coating - 90000 pc (Machine) per annum
--
(h.)Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before CFC After CFC No. of units 102 125 Turnover (Rs. in crore)
950.00 1200.00
Export (Rs. in crore) 100.00 175.00 Employment (nos.) 6000 (Direct
& Indirect) 7500 (Direct & Indirect)
Profitability Appox. 10% of sale turnover
Appox. 12% of sale turnover
117
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
(i.)Pollution clearance required or not
Yes Required
(j.) Manpower in CFC 35 -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
The Charges to be levied will be decided by Executive Body of SPV after consultation with members.
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address Ludhiana Sewing Machine Technology Park Association, 6004, Daba Road, Shimlapuri, Ludhiana-141003
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company Act 2013 --
(c.) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
GM-DIC Ludhiana, Director MSME-DI, Ludhiana
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 12.01.2021 -- (e.) Number of Members 26 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
-- Received
(g.) Authorized Share Capital 50 lakh Promoters Contribution -- (h.) Paid up capital as on............ -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern The Contribution would be shared
equally & each member would not hold more than 10%.
Received
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted Received
(k.) SPV specific A/c M/s Sewing Machine Technology Park. (Rrgd.) Bank - Bank of Baroda, Branch - Industrial Area, Partap Nagar, Ludhiana A/c No. 01040200001537 IFSC Code - BARB0INDLUD
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
The SPV Members visited Mohali Cluster which has motivated them to set up a CFC.
--
(m.) Technical Institution MSME-D, Ludhiana -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence
All members agreed that information about services available at CFC will be shared with non- SPV members
Received
118
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
units of cluster so that they can also get the benefit of facilities available at CFC. The target is to utilize 60% of capacity of CFC in 1st year of running & capacity utilization will be gradually increased to 100%
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
500 KW or 1080000 Units --
(b) Water Submersible pump -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities N/A --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
(a.) Implementing Agency Policy Implementation Unit (PIU), Chandigarh
As per MSE-CDP guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency
(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 months from issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Received
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Received TEAC recommended the proposal
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
Recommended
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Bank of Baroda agreed to sanction Working Capital Loan. State Government Contribution of 10% in the project of CFC in Sewing Machine Cluster has been considered.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments of Cluster Division
(a.) BEP 35.16% 47.59% (As per SIDBI) (b.) IRR, Payback period 4 Years Approx. -- (c.) DSCR 3.21 Average DSCR-12.26
(As per SIDBI) (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
25.31% 30.46% (As per SIDBI)
(e.) NPV Rs. 127.87 lakh -- (f.) DER 2.0
Debt- Rs. 100.00 lakh Equity- Rs. 50.00 lakh
--
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sales.
--
119
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Two CFCs- Hi-Tech Metal Cluster, Mohali and Oil Expeller, Ludhiana are under process.
--
6. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Land and its Development 60.00 60.00 (ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 83.00 83.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 1266.97 1266.97 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 42.86 42.86 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,
maximum 2% of project cost 24.50 24.50
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
18.00 18.00
Total 1495.33 1495.33 7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars % Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) Govt. of India grant under MSE-CDP
79.97 1195.85 1195.85
(ii) Grant from Govt. of Punjab 10.00 149.48 149.48 (iii) SPV contribution 3.34 50.00 50.00 (iv) Bank loan / others 6.69 100.00 100.00
Total 100.00 1495.33 1495.33 8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) .No. Description No. Power
Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
1. Moulding Machines Including - Electrical Control Panel, Hydraulic operated punchout System, Track Runway for Casting, Hopper with Load Cells, Mixer and Cooler, Belt Conveyor set, Pully, Pouring System, Technical support , Fabrication, Installation & Commissioning
1 181 kw 567.34
2. Vertical Machining Centre 1 32 kw 61.22
3. Special Purpose Machinery 15 90 kw 106.20
4. Horizontal Machining Centre 1 32 kw 256.43
5. Powder Coating Plant 1 16 kw 41.30
6. 3D Scanner 1 1 kw 8.50
7. Spectrometer 1 3 kw 21.54
8. Hardness Tester 1 4 kw 3.36
9. CAD CAM Software 1 - 5.46
120
.No. Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
10. Air Pollution Control System for Induction Furnace and Machining Plant
1 16 kw 11.80
11. Furnance Duty Transformer 1 - 8.49
12. Genset 1 - 22.45
13. EOT Crane 1 20kw 28.56
14. Furnace Accessories 1 - 17.70
15. Power Point 1 240 KW 21.54
16. Furnace Transformer 1 240 KW 7.67
17. Melting Furnace 2 240 KW 10.39
18. Furnace Selector Switches 2 240 KW 2.12
19. Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Lathe 1 24 KW 19.94
20. Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Lathe 1 24 KW 27.49
21. Surface Plate 1 - 0.94
22. Zero Zero Grade Slip Gauge Box 1 - 4.13
23. Calliper Checker 1 - 0.12
24. Height Master 1 - 1.77
25. Pressure Gauge 1 - 1.48
26. Digital Pressure Gauge 1 - 0.35
27. Dial Calibrater 1 - 2.36
28. Main LT with APFC Panel 1 - 6.32
Total 1266.97
9. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Sewing Machine Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1495.33 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1195.85 lakh, Government of Punjab contribution of Rs. 149.48 lakh, SPV’s contribution of Rs. 50.00 lakh and bank loan of Rs. 100.00 lakh.
*******
121
Agenda No. 54.3.23: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Cutting Tools Cluster, Patiala, Punjab. Background
Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 52nd SCM held on 22.01.2020, subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
Vide letter dated 05.11.20 and email dated 24.02.21, Government of Punjab submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a
minimum period of 30 years RLA for land has been allotted by PSIEC. The land has been allotted on lease hold basis for a period of 99 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members Provided (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Provided (iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution Provided (v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Provided (vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60
percent of installed capacity Provided
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Provided
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
Provided
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines
Provided
(x) Details of SPV and MoA & AoA Provided (xi) Documentary proof to enhance the no. of Type-B user
members, with a token contribution/ commitment fee for utilising the CFC facilities at a relatively higher fee as decided by CFC management
Provided
(xii) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME-DO
Required
(xiii) Details of production capacity Provided (xiv) Commitment for a minimum of State Government
contribution of 10% of total project cost Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster Cutting Tools Cluster
District Patiala
122
Location of Cluster B-8A, Focal Point, Patiala
Lok Sabha Constituency Patiala
Main Product Slitting Saws, Gear Hobs, Broaches, Misc. Cutters etc.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Units : Nos. Micro : 50 Small : 30 Medium : 04 Total : 84
Turnover for the last five years (Rs in Crore)
Year Amount 2013-14 : Rs. 150.00 2014-15 : Rs. 180.00 2015-16 : Rs. 200.00 2016-17 : Rs. 225.00 2017-18 : Rs. 250.00
Exports for the last five years (Rs in Crore)
Year Amount 2013-14 : Rs. 1.00 2014-15 : Rs. 5.00 2015-16 : Rs. 10.00 2016-17 : Rs. 15.00 2017-18 : Rs. 25.00
Employment in Cluster Total: 3000 Nos. (Direct: 1000 Nos. & Indirect: 2000 Nos.)
Technology Details The CFC Technology would help the cluster units to manufacture high precision products with very low variations i.e. below 8 micron thereby allowing the product quality to be upgraded to AA or AAA. Cluster units are not manufacturing carbite tools. Tool Room machinery would help in precision die cutting tools for various applications to achieve high level of accuracy as required by high end / OEM customers.
Whether DS conducted Yes
Main findings of DSR Gaps in product standardization and quality High production cycle time and lack of precision
owing to use of conventional machinery. Inability to tap value added markets of superior
grade products and lack of transition towards carbide tools.
These gaps are evidently constraints that merit establishment of relatively capital intensive equipments. Appropriate interventions could enable the production of superior grade (A to AAA) products for OEMs and premium customers, increased capacity utilization of the firms, and production of carbide tools to tap their expanding import substitution market. A CFC is a dire need.
Main Problems of Cluster Non-access to cost prohibitive latest technology machines.
Majority of the micro enterprises are dealing with only one product segment.
While, Gear Hobs and Broach manufacturers provide low cost customized solutions to their clients, the General Cutting Tool manufacturers also cater to standardized product range.
Therefore, CFC is expected to address the
123
technological gaps being faced by the cluster members as a stimulant for volume growth and profitability by providing quality products.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To facilitate cluster units to progressively cater to premium market segments like OEMs.
To facilitate production of Carbide cutting tools to tap growing market needs.
To improve capacity of the units and create additional employment opportunities in the region.
--
(b.) Location of CFC B-8A, Industrial Focal Point, Patiala, where majority of the Cutting Tool units of Patiala are located.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
71 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
29 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes RLA for land allotted by PSIEC submitted. The land has been allotted on lease hold basis for a period of 99 years.
ii. Title is in name of Patiala Cluster of Cutting Tools Manufacturers
iii. Valuation and its basis PSIEC allotment rate @Rs. 3300/- per sq. yd.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use No
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
99 years lease hold basis by PSIEC, Chandigarh subject to payment of remaining payments in 6 installments. (renewable for another 99 years)
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
9300 sq.ft --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 1695/- per sq.ft. complete in all respects including cost of electrification, sanitary expenses, contractor expenses, taxes etc., including boundary wall, gates, grills, shutters.
--
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Carbide Cutting Tool Section Gear Hobbing Section Tool Room
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Workshop Shed: 4,340 sq. ft.
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC,
Particulars Before CFC After CFC No. of units 84 Approx. 95-100
124
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Turnover (Rs. in crore)
Rs. 250.00 Rs. 500.00
Export (Rs. in crore)
Rs. 25.00 Rs. 75.00
Employment About 3000 Nos. About 4000 Nos.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Submitted Submitted
(j.) Man Power in CFC The total manpower requirement for the project would be about 35 persons.
--
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
In this DPR, estimates of income are projected on the basis of user charges to be levied for provisions of various inputs and services to SPV member units and other cluster firms. The major income sources are envisaged by way of provision of 5 axis CNC tool and cutter grinder machines for manufacturing and re-sharpening of standard & complex tools; 4 axis CNC hob relief profile grinding machine for manufacturing of all kinds of different hob types with top quality products and minimum cycle time, CNC precision measuring centre, tool room machines including wire cuts EDM, CNC surface grinder, CNC vertical milling centre, and CNC turning centre.
Submitted
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address M/s Patiala Cluster of Cutting Tools Manufacturers Forum, 23-A,Factory Area, Patiala,147001
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company Act,2013 --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
GM-DIC, Patiala; Director, MSME-DI, Ludhiana
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
11.02.2021 --
(e.) Number of Members 23 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
Rs. 142.76 lacs --
(h.) Paid up capital as on...........
Rs. 48.30 lac --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern All the 23 SPV members have allocated 621 shares each, out of total equity of Rs. 142.76
Submitted
125
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
lakh i.e. equal share of 4.348%.
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted Submitted
(k.) SPV specific A/c Submitted Submitted
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Written confirmation has been received from 56 cluster members w.r.t. their willingness to use the CFC facilities.
Visit to MacAuto expo. Joint meetings amongst cluster members, with DIC as well as MSME officials for trust building of SPV.
--
(m.) Technical Institution Nearest Technical Institution, Central Tool Room, Ludhiana (Punjab)
--
(n.) CFC may be utilized by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Written confirmation has been received from 56 cluster members w.r.t. their willingness to use the CFC facilities.
Submitted
(o.) --
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
178.30 --
(b) Water For human consumption --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities coolants, cutting oil --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Policy Implementation Unit (PIU), Chandigarh
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
(c.) Implementation Period 24 months Within 24 months from the date of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Received
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
TEAC recommended the proposal
(f.) Approval of Technical
126
Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division
(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
The CFC is proposing to approach PNB Focal Point, Patiala for availing Working Capital Limits. Working capital requirement is Rs.9.98 lakh during the first year.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 43.08% As per SIDBI, 25.74%
(b.) IRR, Payback period 17.26%, 2 years 10 months As per SIDBI, 15.15% (after tax)
(c.) DSCR N.A. --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
Based on contribution of SPV members only -31.41%
Based on contribution of SPV members plus grant from Central Govt. - 12.76%
As per SIDBI, 38.23%
(e.) NPV 418.40 As per SIDBI, Before tax-Rs. 672.00 lakh (positive) After tax- Rs. 356.17 lakh (positive)
(f.) DER - --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis 10% drop in C.U. ---- BEP 43.81%, ROCE 31.92%, IRR 13.94%
10% drop in User Charges -- BEP 49.20%, ROCE 31.77%, IRR 14.13%
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
One CFC is partially operational 1st installment of GoI has been released
for one CFC. Two CFCs have been accorded Final
approval. One CFC has been accorded In-principle
approval
--
6. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-
CDP
(i) Land and its Development 72.65 72.65
(ii) Building (Civil and Structural works) 157.59 157.59
(iii) Plant & Machinery 1071.34 1071.34
127
(iv) Misc. Fixed Assets 40.15 40.15
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
24.70 24.70
(vi) Contingency (2% Building and 5% on Plant and Machinery)
58.75 58.75
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 2.50 2.50
Total 1427.68 1427.68
7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1284.91 1142.14
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Punjab 0.00 142.77
(iii) SPV contribution 142.77 142.77
Total 1427.68 1427.68
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Description No. Power
Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
1. 5 Axis CNC Tool & Cutter Grinder 1 120 184.06
2. Wheel Dressing Centre (diamond wheel max. dia x width x bore (150x20x20 mm), spindle speed 1400 rpm, radius 0.2 to 7R), rotary table rotation +180 to -90°, projector head 400 mm dia with 20x magnification optics.
1 2.50 15.05
3. CNC Hob Relief Profile Grinding Machine, 4 Axis Machine, maximum module 12, maximum work dia 200, maximum work length 250, suitable for manufacturing products AA, AAA.
1 10 328.04
4. CNC Precision Measuring Center, work dia 300 mm, work length 450 mm, work piece weight 100 kg, 3 Axis (XYZ)
1 1.30 267.71
5. Wire Cut Machines (with helical/ fine cuttings), job size 400x500x250 mm with programmable flushing, pulse generator with offline system software, dielectric unit, mineral bed filtration system, refrigerated re-circulated liquid chiller, and standard accessories and installation kit along with 15 KVA Servo Stabilizer and Adjustable bridge component, round job holder and harmonic filter.
1 10 42.72
6. Band Saw Cutting Machine (semi automatic upto 500 mm) along with accessories, Roller Table, Variable Vice Pressure, Chip conveyor, Anti Vibration
1 8.50 12.25
7. Drill Machine Radial 1 2.00 1.55
8. EDM machine, Electrode machine for Dye-sinking, along with EDM oil and Stabiliser 5 KVA
1 5.00 11.55
128
S. No. Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
9. 2D/ 3D Laser Scanner 1 1.00 36.40
10. CNC Surface Grinder, Table size 1500 x 600 mm, travel 1600/660/600 (X/Y/Z), Spindle speed 1740 rpm, cross feed 1250 x 1500 mm per minute,
1 10.00 63.65
11. CNC Vertical Milling Centre (VMC) -- Travels X / Y /Z 762 /406/508 mm, Table size 900/350 mm, Spindle (RPM min 1000, type - inline direct drive, power - 22.4 KW), Automatic Tool Changer (ATC-30)
1 40.00 50.54
12. CNC Turning Centre, along with accessories Bar feeder, Chip conveyor, part catcher, 300 mm length
1 20.00 30.95
13. CNC Turning Centre along with accessories Chip conveyor, centre-to-centre 500 mm length
1 25.00 26.87
Total 1071.34
9. Observations: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME-DO. 10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Cutting Tools Cluster, Patiala, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1427.68 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs. 1142.14 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 142.77 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 142.77 lakh.
***********
129
Agenda No. 54.3.24: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Jewellery Cluster, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu.
Background
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 73rd meetings held on 17.08.2020 and Committe recommended the same to place before Steering Committee for final approval.
Vide letter dated 19.11.2020, TANSIDCO, Chennai has forwarded the following documents submitted and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum
period of 30 years. To be submitted
(ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. As per TANSIDCO letter dated 19.11.20 project is under white category
(iii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members. Received (iv) Project Appraisal Report. Received (v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Received (vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60
percent of installed capacity. Received
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
To be submitted
(x) Details of SPV formation in Section-8 of Company Act with MoA & AoA
To be submitted
(xi) Details of Bank account of implementing Agency. To be submitted (xii) Tangible outcomes such as number of units, turnover, export,
employment etc. in the format provided. Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster : Jewellery Cluster,
District : Tirunelveli
Location of Cluster : Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu
Lok Sabha Constituency : Tirunelveli
Main Product : The units in the cluster have expertise in making of traditional gold jewellery. This includes rings, filigree, chains, bangles, diamond jewellery, special/auspicious items and stone setting.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro : 1050
Turnover(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Year Amount 2014-15 : 18.00 2015-16 : 19.20 2016-17 : 20.40 2017-18 : 21.60 2018-19 : 22.80
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last Nil
130
five years
Employment in Cluster : Direct Employment- 2500 Indirect Employment- 6000
Technology Details : The cluster is predominately using traditional / manual processes for various operations.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes.
Main findings of DSR : The Gold Jewellery as an industry is Nellai is historic time immemorial.
There are about 1000 Gold smith workshop units and 50 supporting units in the cluster.
All the cluster units are Micro Enterprises. The technological upgradation is low at present, but the units
have shown the keen interest of the units on modernization. The industry is facing labour problems, increase in price of
raw material and no proper awareness of market potential. The cluster units are having direct consumers however the
same is on decline due to competition from organized sector (retail).
The annual business turnover of the cluster production is around Rs.18.00 cr.
Main Problems of Cluster : Disproportionate need for capital for raw material. Lacuna of business literacy. Competition from technology supported manufacturing
voluminous. Increasing market share of organized retails.
Other Information : --
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The Cluster is using conventional Manual Technology. To compete with large corporates, Goldsmith Units require High Quality and Wide range of product manufacturing, design and Skill upgradation and Technology Interventions, Quality Assurance and Product Standardisations.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu --
% age of units in radius of 5km
1000 Nos. --
% age of units in radius of 10km
1050 Nos. --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired NA Notarized lease deed documents of building in the name of SPV is Provided, same should be registered. (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for minimum 30 years is required).
ii. Title is in name of NA
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use NA
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
30 (As per Lease agreement)
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
131
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 6555 (As per Lease Agreement) --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed CAD/CAM Facilities Hallmarking Facility (BIS) Testing Facility Product Design & Development facility Laser Welding Laser CNC cutting Modern universal work benches Laser marking facility Die press unit and Casting facility
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before CFC
After CFC
Turnover (Rs. in lakh)
2280.00 2622.00
Production (In MT)
15 20
Employment 2500 3000
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
NA Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 45 Nos. --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Service Charges for various uses from Design, Training, Testing, Precision Cutting, Product Development, Standardisation
--
(l.)
3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Nellai Jewellery Manufacturing Cluster Private Limited, Address – 118/10, Veerakerala Perun Street, Tirunveli Town, District - Tirunveli, Tamil Nadu - 627006
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Pvt. Ltd, Company (SPV has applied for change to Section 8 Company)
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Not Provided --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 12/09/2018 --
(e.) Number of Members 51 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes Details of SPV formation in Section-8 of Company Act with MoA & AoA is required.
(g.) Authorized Share Capital SPV has indicated that necessary promoters contribution would be raised by it by way of
--
132
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
an equal contribution from all the members
(h.) Paid up capital -- --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Given --
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Given --
(k.) SPV specific A/c HDFC Bank, Branch Sripuram Tirunelveli CTO Building, Tirunelveli Account Number: 50200034221548
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
-- --
(m.) Technical Institution -- --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Scanned copy of letter 23.10.20 has been received from SPV, certifying that at least 60% of the installed capacity will be utilized by SPV members.
--
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
184.50 KW --
(b) Water 10 Litres --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities -- --
4. Implement Arrangements Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited, Chennai
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited, Chennai
(c.) Implementation Period 12 months from the date of final approval of NLSC
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
SIDBI Appraisal Report Appraisal report is received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
-- Recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC).
(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
133
5. Financial Analysis of CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 29.78% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period
After Tax- 14.61% --
(c.) DSCR NA, as no term loan component envisaged in project. --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
37.85% --
(e.) NPV Before Tax – Rs. 315.50 lakh After Tax – Rs. 162.83 lakh
--
(f.) DER NA, as no term loan component envisaged in project. --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis (Rs. in lakh)
Base case
decreasing Sales & job income by
increasing raw material cost by
decreasing production cap utilization by
DSCR NA NA NA NA BEP 29.78% 34.18% 29.78% 29.78% Cash BEP 11.86% 13.60% 11.86% 11.85% ROCE 32.03% 24.99% 32.03% 20.32% IRR (before tax)
18.41% 14.75% 18.41% 11.81%
IRR (before tax)
14.61% 11.62% 14.61% 9.26%
NPV (before tax)
315.50 171.51 315.50 64.18
NPV (After tax)
162.83 55.29 162.83 -24.75
Profitability index (before tax)
1.43 1.23 1.43 1.09
Profitability index (before tax)
1.22 1.08 1.22 0.97
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
24 CFCs completed, 19 ongoing --
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended
by SIDBI As per MSE-
CDP
1 Building (on lease) 2.00 2.00 2.00
2 Plant and Machinery including MFA, Installation, Taxes / Duties, etc.
692.00 692.00 692.00
3 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 14.57 14.57 14.57
4 Contingencies 5.00 5.00 5.00
5 Working Capital 34.60 34.60 34.60
Total Project Cost 748.17 748.17 748.17
134
7. Proposed means of finance are as follows: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 598.54 598.53 598.53
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 74.82 74.82 74.82
3 SPV contribution 74.81 74.82 74.82
Total 748.17 748.17 748.17
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
S. No Machine Name Qty Amount (Rs in Lakh )
1 CAD 3 25.37 2 CAM 1 17.36 3 CAM CPU 4 3.56 4 CAM UPS 1 3.56 5 Camera box + Camera 1 7.60 6 Rubber Mould 1 1.57 7 Liquid rubber mixing setup 1 1.96 8 Rubber mould cutting bench 2 0.16 9 Wax Injection 1 20.11
10 Wax cleaning / tree making 2 0.24 11 Wax setting bench 6 0.72 12 Investment mixer 5 Flask Machine 1 14.69 13 Burnout Furnace of capacity 12 flask 1 3.97 14 Burnout Furnance small furnance 1 2.38 15 Casting machine 1 38.72 16 Casting machine voltage stabliser 1 0.31 17 Water Jet 1 2.76 18 Liquid Honning 1 13.09 19 Sprue Grinding Machine 2 3.18 20 Rolling Mill (Only Sheet of 10") 1 8.72 21 Filing Work Bench with DC 6 8.35 22 Foredom motor 5 1.24 23 Bench light 5 0.40 24 Filing QC Table 1 0.28 25 Filing QC Light 1 0.15 26 Gms weighing scale 1 0.61 27 Microbrazer 1 4.01 28 Magnetic Polish 1 2.56 29 Vibrator 1 1.99 30 Micro Setting Table with DC 5 2.38 31 Normal Setting table 5 2.71 32 Microscope and GRS tools 2 16.91 33 Micro Motor 5 1.51 34 Bench light 5 0.40 35 Bench grinder for Gravers 1 1.77 36 Setting QC Table 2 0.75 37 Setting QC Light 2 0.16 38 CTS weighing scale 1 1.19 39 Laser Welder 1 20.92 40 Laser welder voltage stabiliser 1 0.18 41 Stone Fitting Machine 1 2.97 42 Polishing single station 1 1.19 43 Polishing 2 stations with DC 2 2.85 44 Electro polish 1 16.20
135
S. No Machine Name Qty Amount (Rs in Lakh ) 45 Rhodium plating setup 1 3.03 46 Gold plating setup 1 3.03 47 Sand blasting machine 1 1.19 48 Enamel setup 1 4.72 49 Laser marker 1 53.23 50 Laser marker CPU 1 0.89 51 Laser marker UPS 1 0.89 52 Final QC Table 2 0.75 53 Final QC Light 2 0.16 54 Final QC supervisor Table 1 0.37 55 CTS weighing scale 1 1.19 56 Settling Tank 2 1.60 57 Hot Plate 5 0.13 58 Ultrasonic 3 1.98 59 Steam 1 3.97 60 Induction Melting machine 2Kg 1 3.93 61 Chiller for induction melting 1 0.56 62 Issue Receipt CPU 4 3.56 63 Weighing scale 2 1.98 64 XRF 1 38.99 65 XRF CPU 1 0.89 66 Compressor 1 7.92 67 DG sets +Solar 1 12.64 68 Vaccum cleaner 4 0.48 69 Washing machine 1 0.45 70 CCTV system 1 5.34 71 Fire Alarm 1 3.56 72 Wire Drawing 12 Pass 1 6.36 73 Bead and bead chain Making Machine 1 76.55 74 Bead faceting 1 12.73 75 Continuous Casting Machine - 1 32.94 76 Rolling Mill (3-Bed) 1 7.92 77 Hydraulic Press 150 ton 1 8.00 78 Annealing furnace 1 20.83 79 Circular saw Blade 1 0.93 80 Belt Furnance for continous braze soldering 1 40.95 81 Tikli making Machine 1 1.60 82 Electrical Works 29.58 83 Chain Macking Machines of Multiple Types 1 34.47
Total 692.00 9. Observation: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV. (ii) SPV formation in Section-8 of Company Act with MoA & AoA (iii) Compliance of all requirements/provisions/columns of online application as per
guidelines including conditions imposed by TEAC. (iv) Uploading of SPV members details on MSE-CDP Portal. (v) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by IA.
136
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Jewellery Cluster, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu at a total project cost of Rs.748.17 lakh with GoI grant of Rs.598.53 lakh, State Government’s contribution of Rs.74.82 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.74.82 lakh.
*********
137
Agenda No. 54.3.25: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at
Mandapally, Siddipet District, Telangana. Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 20.12.19, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 01.09.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad submitted the following documents
and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status (i) As agreed upon by State Government, letter
regarding enhancement of State share to 30% as in the case of earlier projects.
Vide letter dated 26.02.20, Govt. of Telangana has agreed to contribute the enhanced contribution.
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
Received
(iii) Copy of approved layout plan Received (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed
format. Received.
(vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Received
(vii) Certificate from State Government / IA that more than 50% plots developed would be allotted to established Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(viii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received
(ix) Comments of Economic Officer from MSME-DI, Hyderabad regarding the project proposal.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Siddipet. Industrial Estate : Industrial Park at Mandapally 2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 319.64 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 52.88 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 79
138
Particulars Description Plot Size (acre.) No. of plots 0.25 - 0.30 53 0.31 – 0.50 22 0.51 – 0.80 04 Total No. of Plots 79
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Completed Infrastructure Development (ID) Projects: (i) Industrial Estate at Madikonda Village,
Warangal District (ID-New). Ongoing Infrastructure Development (ID) Projects:
(ii) Automotive & Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District (ID-New).
(iii) ID centre at Ravalkole (V), Medchal – Malkajgiri.
(iv) Up-gradation of Industrial Parks at Autonagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District.
(v) Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District.
(vi) New Industrial Estate at Sultanpur, Sangareddy District.
(vii) New Industrial Estate at Kallem, Jangaon District.
(viii) New Industrial Estate at Buggapadu, Khammam District.
(ix) New Industrial Estate at Autonagar, Kundanpally village, Peddapalli District.
(x) Industrial Infrastructure development Centre (IIDC) at Armoor (V&M).
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes, Proposed site for establishing industrial park is near Mandapally village, Siddipet Urban Mandal in Siddipet district of Telangana state. The project site is located near Mandapally village of State Highway 1 at a distance of 5 km and 3 kms from major district road. The nearest railway station to the project site is Jangaon, located approximately at a distance of 45 km. However, a new Greenfield rail line is being laid (Gajewl-
--
139
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Siddipet-Karimnagar) passing nearer to the site The nearest airport to the project site is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at 150 km southwest of project site. Water for the proposed industrial park can be sourced from (1) Devadula Canal (2) Mission Bhagiratha Pipeline.
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
Yes cost estimates have been made based on approved SSR rates schedules GoTs.
Not received.
Tangible Outcomes of the project
As per SIDBI Report: Description Before After Units - 79 Investment (Rs. in crore)
- 1975
Aggregate Employment in Nos. (Direct / Indirect)
- 3555 (Direct – 1205 &
Indirect-2370) Expected turnover (Rs. in crore).
- 27.65
Justification of the Proposal The development of IP Mandapally for MSEs in agriculture & allied sectors is expected to induce investments essentially through new entrants in the region. The development of infrastructure in IP AT Mandapally will facilitate setting up of new units in the allotted plots i.e. 79 units with investments of Rs. 19.75 crore and 1185 direct & 2370 Indirect employment opportunity by the year 2025.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
140
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing
96.30 96.30
(ii) Cost of laying roads 203.88 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.29 9.29
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
114.74 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 9.54 9.54
(vi) Drainage (Internal) 78.75 60.00
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
252.00 250.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00
Sub Total 774.50 745.13
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative Office Building 19.95 19.95
(ii) Documentation Centre 17.65 17.65
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 26.49 26.49
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 17.65 17.65
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 29.46 29.46
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 17.65 17.65
Sub Total 128.85 128.85
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 75.00 75.00
4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 29.27 20.00
Total 1007.62 968.98
5. Proposed means of finance (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 678.28*
(ii) Govt. of Telangana 329.34
Total 1007.62
* GoI grant of Rs. 678.28 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.968.98 lakh. 6. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Mandapally, Siddipet District, Telangana at a total project cost of Rs. 1007.62 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 678.28 lakh & State Government contribution of Rs. 329.34 lakh .
141
***** Agenda No. 54.3.26: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC)
in Terracotta Pottery Cluster, Bhathat & Chargawan Blocks, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh.
Background
Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide email dated 04.12.20, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India (EDII), Gorakhpur forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Enhancement of Government of Uttar Pradesh grant towards the project, to that extent GoI grant would be reduced.
GoUP share is still same. No share enhancement has been done.
(ii) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years.).
SPV has submitted unregistered lease deed. Registered lease deed is required.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iv) Details of Revenue generation mechanism. Provided (v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Required (vi) Copy of Article of Association and Memorandum of
Association. Provided
(vii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Provided
(viii) Details of SPV’s bank account/ Mandate form. Bank mandate form is required.
(ix) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(x) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Provided
(xi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Required
(xii) No. of beneficiary units (SPV members) should be enhanced and list of members to be provided.
Required
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster Terracotta Pottery Cluster
District Gorakhapur
Location of Cluster Bhathat & Chargawan Blocks
Lok Sabha Constituency Gorakhpur
Main Product Decorative Terracotta items, Pottery Traditional items, Terracotta Kitchen items, Terracotta worship items.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro-200
Turnover for the last five years Year (Rs. in crore)
142
2014-15 : 1.62 2015-16 : 1.84 2016-17 : 2.00 2017-18 : 2.16 2018-19 : 2.26
Exports for the last five years (Rs in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster Direct- 640 Indirect- 2500
Technology Details Ball Mill, Pug Mill, Electric Pottery wheel, Electric Furnace etc
Whether DS Conducted Aurangbad, Gulariya, Bharwalia, Jungle Akla etc by EDII
Main findings of DSR In Gorakhpur Terracotta Pottery Cluster, there are 200 (two hundred) principal firms which are producing terracotta house hold goods. However, these are all individuals who make their own separate efforts to achieve their own bits of success, and there is hardly any association between them. They have not received any grants or monetary support from either the State or the Central governments, and handle all their manufacturing needs personally. Due to the lack of any industrial infrastructural basis, they still need to seek assistance from Thangadh, Delhi, etc. for issues regarding mould-making, tool-making, or machinery repairing. The presence of an unifying infrastructural body that provides these services, along with the establishment of a design facility providing instant digital rendering of designs provided by stakeholders and manufacturing of moulds and tools through CAD/CAM technology, shall allow these individuals to pool in their efforts and interests and bring about rapid and progressive development in the pottery industry of Uttar Pradesh.
Main Problems of Cluster The variety of products and the process required to produce those items have made the units of this cluster prone to facing various bottleneck. Basically all the plant and equipments installed in different units in individual level are procured from different regions of India who might not have service centers even in the state capital, Lucknow.
Other Information Any sort of setback due to malfunction / breakage of component of those machines lead to serious implications on the output performance of the factories. In addition to this the general development of ancillaries in this cluster locality is dismal due to absence of corporate manufacturing / engineering industry.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The Common Facility Centre, to be done by Gorakhpur Terracotta Vikas Sahkari Samiti, Gulhariya, Gorakhpur is going to play the most vital role in the cluster development in the true sense of the word. The role of CFC starts from providing DESIGN SERVICE to the stakeholders. It will maintain an ARCHIVE of traditional and innovative designs of numerous household articles, brought by the stakeholders. Another very important role of CFC is going to help the stakeholders get high quality moulds/tooling at cheaper rates than what they are presently getting from Kolkata and also helping them in maintenance of their existing machineries
--
143
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
ad moulds as and when required. The CFC will play a very important role in overall economic development of this cluster as the economy of Gulariya-has been considerably dependant on this terracotta cluster. Once with the valuable support from the CFC the stakeholder-members of the SPV can start growing economically, and non-member manufacturers will become members to be a part of this economic growth process.
(b.) Location of CFC Aaurangabad, Gulariya, Bharwaliya, Jungle Akla etc villages under Bhatahat and Chargawan Blocks Dist Gorakhpur of Uttar Pradesh. This cluster is located at a distance of 25 km approx from the district headquarter of Gorakhpur on Gorakhpur Maharajganj road NH 24. The distance of the state capital Lucknow is 290 km. However Lucknow is well connected to this place by road and rail. Also this cluster is having road/rail connectivity with all most all parts of the country as well as neighboring country Nepal
% age of units in radius of 5km 80
% age of units in radius of 10km
20
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Lease land Land lease deed is not registered. Registered lease deed is required.
ii. Title is in name of Gorakhpur Terracotta Vikas Sahkari Samiti, Gulhariya, Gorakhpur
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use NA
vi. If on lease, duration of lease NA
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
NA
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 6200 sq. ft. --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Computer Aided Product and Tool Design Product Model Making Raw Material Making & Colour Making Workshop Store & Tool Room Testing Laboratory Training Centre Information Hub
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Year wise capacity chart --
(h.) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after
S. No. Particulars Before CFC After CFC (i) No. of units 200 (micro) 316 (ii) Turnover Rs. 2.26 crore Rs. 5.00 crore
144
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment etc.)
(iii) Export Rs. 0.02 crore Rs. 0.50 crore (iv) Employment 3140 4900
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Eco friendly products. Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC Manpower requirements and establishment expenses
--
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Rate of Return, Payback period % net present value
Provided
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Gorakhpur Terracotta Vikas Sahkari Samiti, Gulhariya, Gorakhpur
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Cooperative Society --
(c.) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
GM-DIC, MSME Required
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 24.09.18 --
(e.) Number of Members 21 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Submitted Provided
(g.) Authorized Share Capital NA --
(h.) Paid up capital NA --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern SPV share holding pattern submitted --
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
SPV members are agreed. Provided
(k.) SPV specific A/c A/c will open. Required
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Good track record --
(m.) Technical Institution EDII, Design Institute etc --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
60% of installed capacity Provided
(o.)
145
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
Cost of electricity --
(b) Water water --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities generator --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Uttar Pradesh Trade Promotion Authority (UPTPA)
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency --
(c.) Implementation Period 24 Months 24 months from the date of issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Submitted
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
TEAC recommended the proposal
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Not applicable --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 27.49% As per SIDBI BEP in optimum year (FY 2026) = 35.55%
(b.) IRR, Payback period 23.26% As per SIDBI IRR (after tax) = 19.37%
(c.) DSCR -- --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
28.17% As per SIDBI ROCE in optimum year (FY 2026)= 41.96% Average ROCE = 42.99%
(e.) NPV 251.99 lakh As per SIDBI NPV (before tax)= Rs. 196.30 lakh (positive) NPV (after tax)= Rs. 116.73 lakh (positive)
(f.) DER -- --
146
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis -- --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
05 CFC projects are being implemented under MSE-CDP.
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land & Site Development 19.72 19.72 (ii) Building & Civil Works 30.00 30.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery 154.08 154.08 (iv) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 50.56 50.56 (v) Preliminary Expenses 11.25 11.25 (vi) Pre-operative Expenses 6.60 6.60 (vii) Provision for contingencies 5.22 5.22 (viii) Margin money for working capital 5.62 5.62
Total 283.05 283.05 7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars % Proposed by
IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As
per MSE-CDP (i) Grant from Govt. of India 71.15 201.39 201.39 (ii) Grant from Govt. of UP 13.03 36.87 36.87 (iii) Contribution by Consortium / SPV 15.82 44.79 44.79
Total 100.00 283.05 283.05 8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) S. No. Name of the machinery Quantity Total Cost
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Ball Mill 04 18.03 (ii) De-Airing Pug Mill 03 14.29 (iii) Electric Potter’s Wheel 30 9.90 (iv) Designing Wheel 50 1.27 (v) Complete CAD centre and Model Making Set-up 01 1.91 (vi) Air Compressor with Touch up Spray Gun 05 13.97 (vii) Complete Pottery Tools-Set 100 3.81 (viii) Electric Furnace 05 50.80 (ix) Bore well with Motor & Water storage tank 01 4.76 (x) Power Generator 03 29.53 (xi) 3 phase Electrification 01 5.46 Transportation Cost 0.35
Total 154.08 9. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:
(i) Government of Uttar Pradesh has not enhanced its share. State share is still 13.03%. (ii) Registered land lease deed in the name of SPV. (iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
147
(iv) Details of SPV’s bank account/ Mandate form. (v) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines. (vi) Inclusion of name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV. (vii) Inclusion of condition in bye-laws that SPV will not eligible for drawing any profit from
operation of the CFC and profit generated during the operation shall be ploughed back for further development of CFC.
(viii) No. of beneficiary units (SPV members) should be enhanced and list of members to be provided.
(ix) Confirmation from State Government regarding Implementing Agency and Fund Receiving Agency for the project.
(x) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre in Terracotta Pottery Cluster, Bhathat & Chargawan Blocks, Gorakhapur, Uttar Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 283.05 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 201.39 lakh, State contribution of Rs. 36.87 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 44.79 lakh.
*****
148
Agenda Item No. 54.4.1: Time Extension for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Automotive & Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District, Telangana.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the proposal and location
New Industrial Estate at Automotive & Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District.
2 Approval accorded 32nd SCM held on 20.03.13. 3 Final approval
order issued on 21.03.14
4 Name of the IA Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC), Hyderabad.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 752.65
Govt. of Telangana : 188.17
Total : 940.82
6 Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Approved
Cost
1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure
i) Cost of land filling/ levelling including boundary wall and fencing
100.00
ii) Cost of laying roads 145.00 iii) Landscaping / Road side
greenery/ Social forestry 10.00
iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump house
110.00
v) Water harvesting 10.00 vi) Drainage 60.00
vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network work including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy
250.00
viii) Other (sanitary conveniences etc.)
10.00
Sub Total 695.00 2. Administrative and Other Services
Complex (i) Administrative office building 149.11
(ii) Tele-communication / Cyber centre/Documentation centre
(iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition centre
(iv) Bank / Post office (v) Raw material storage facility,
Marketing outlets (vi) First aid centre, Creche,
Canteen 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 78.26 4. Contingencies & Pre-operative
exp. 18.45
149
S. No. Description Status Sub Total 245.82 Total 940.82
7 Total GoI grant released
Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) 1st on 28.09.14 : 62.88 2nd on 15.12.17 : 200.00 3rd on 23.07.19 : 400.00 Total : 662.88
8 Project validity 31.12.19 9 Time Extension
sought up to 31.12.20
10 Reason for Delay The delay in completion of the balance works was mainly due to the non-availability of labour during lock down period, the progress was hampered. The work has resumed after lock down, with minimum labour.
11 Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may accord Time extension upto 31.12.20.
*********
150
Agenda Item No.54.5.1: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of CFC in Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana
2. Approval accorded 33rd SCM held on 14.06.13 3. Final approval order
issued on 09.09.13
4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP), Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1022.54 Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00 SPV contribution : 530.78
Total : 1703.32
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Land and its Development 283.50 (ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 216.27 (iii) Plant & Machinery(including
electrification) (list of plant and machinery with tentative cost – Annexed)
1076.91
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 20.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,
maximum 2% of project cost 34.06
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
58.16
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 14.42 Total 1703.32
7. Total GoI grant released
Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 28.08.19
409.01
Total 409.01
8. Validity upto 31.01.20 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.07.21
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*******
151
Agenda Item No.54.5.2: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana
2. Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17 3. Final approval order
issued on 04.05.17
4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP), Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1319.00 Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00 SPV contribution : 171.00
Total : 1640.00
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh)
(i) Land and its Development 113.20
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 67.30
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification)
1410.43
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 10.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
10.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
29.07
Total Project Cost 1640.00
7. Total GoI grant released
Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 08.08.19 527.60 2nd installment on 31.07.20 395.70
Total 923.30
8. Validity upto 04.05.20 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to 31.03.21
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*******
152
Agenda Item No.54.5.3: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana. S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana
2. Approval accorded 40th SCM held on 02.07.16 3. Final approval order
issued on 06.10.16
4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP), Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1199.45 Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00 SPV contribution : 208.00
Total : 1557.45
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Land and its Development 50.00 (ii) Building and other Civil
Constructions 150.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) (Annexure)
1295.58
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 10.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
30.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
15.87
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 6.00 Total 1557.45
7. Total GoI grant released
Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 18.12.19 479.78
Total 479.78
8. Validity upto 31.03.20 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to 31.12.21
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*****
153
Agenda Item No.54.5.4: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Plastic Packaging Cluster, Karnal, Haryana. S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of CFC in Plastic Packaging Cluster, Karnal, Haryana
2. Approval accorded 46th SCM held on 09.02.18 3. Final approval order
issued on 11.04.18
4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP), Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1050.00 Govt. of Haryana Grant : 371.54 SPV contribution : 221.54
Total : 1643.08
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Land and its Development 221.64 (ii) Building and other Civil
Constructions 331.14
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification)
918.32
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 13.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
89.87
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
46.67
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 22.44 Total 1643.08
7. Total GoI grant released
Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 06.09.19 420.00 2nd installment on 19.11.20 315.00
Total 735.00
8. Validity upto 11.04.20 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to 30.06.21
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*****
154
Agenda Item No. 54.5.5: Ratification of Time Extension granted for Up-gradation of ID Plots at Edayar, Ernakulam District, Kerala.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the proposal and location
Up-gradation of ID Plots at Edayar, Ernakulam District.
2 Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17. 3 Final approval order
issued on 03.05.17
4 Name of the IA Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (KBIP), Thiruvananthapuram is the fund receiving and executing agency for the project. However, Implementing Agency (IA) for the project will be Directorate of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Kerala.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 580.614
Govt. of Kerala : 387.076
Total : 967.690
6 Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No.
Particulars Approved Cost
1.(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing:
0.00
(ii) Laying roads 661.83
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry
4.98
(iv) Drainage 182.77
(v) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
98.24
2. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses :
19.87
Total 967.69
7 Total GoI grant released
Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) 1st on 16.01.19 : 200.00 Total : 200.00
8 Validity upto 02.05.19 9 Time extension
accorded on file up to 31.03.21
10 Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*********
155
Agenda Item No. 54.5.6: Ratification of Time Extension granted for Up-gradation of
Industrial Development Project at Poovanthuruthu, Kottayam District, Kerala.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the proposal and location
Up-gradation of Industrial Development Project at Poovanthuruthu, Kottayam District, Kerala.
2 Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17. 3 Final approval order
issued on 03.05.17
4 Name of the IA Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (KBIP), Thiruvananthapuram is the fund receiving and executing agency for the project. However, Implementing Agency (IA) for the project will be Directorate of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Kerala.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 600.00
Govt. of Kerala : 400.00
Total : 1000.00
6 Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
1.(i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing:
0.00
(ii) Laying roads 248.16
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry
3.67
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
117.20
(v) Drainage 142.76
(vi) Power (Sub Station and distribution network, work including Street light etc), Generation of non conventional Energy.
225.88
(vii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc)
120.08
2.(i) Administrative building cum documentation centre, Conference Hall.
81.03
(ii) First Aid centre, Creche, Canteen Facilities etc, Fire Protection, Solid Waste Management system, Road side Signage, Bus Shelter.
20.97
3 Effluent treatment Facilities 20.25
156
S. No. Description Status
4 Contingencies and Pre-operative expenses
20.00
Total 1000.00
7 Total GoI grant released
Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) 1st on 16.01.19 : 200.00 Total : 200.00
8 Validity upto 02.05.19 9 Time extension
accorded on file up to 31.03.21
10 Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*********
157
Agenda Item No.54.5.7: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Plastic & Packaging Cluster, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Plastic & Packaging Cluster, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh
2. Approval accorded 45th SCM held on 22.11.17 3. Final approval order issued
on 23.02.18
4. Name of the IA MP Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MPIDC)
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 551.00 Govt. of MP : 26.00 SPV contribution : 158.00 Bank loan : 62.50
Total : 797.50
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Land and its Development 26.00 (ii) Building and other civil
constructions 155.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification)
531.50
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 25.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses 16.00
(vi) Contingency (Maximum-2% on building)
3.00
(vii) Contingency (Maximum-5% on plant & machinery)
26.00
(viii) Margin for working capital 15.00 Total 797.50
7. Total GoI grant released Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 29.12.20
220.40
Total 220.40
8. Validity upto 22.02.2020 9. Time extension accorded on
file up to 31.03.2021
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
******
158
Agenda Item No. 54.5.8: Ratification of Time Extension granted for completion of the project for setting up of CFC in Hi-Tech Metal Cluster, Mohali, Punjab.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Hi-Tech Metal Cluster, Mohali, Punjab
2. Approval accorded 29th SCM held on 24.02.12 3. Final approval order
issued on 03.07.13
4. Name of the IA Policy Implementation Unit (PIU), Chandigarh 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 1106.85 SPV contribution : 160.84 Unsecured Loan from members & others
: 140.00
Total : 1407.69
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Land and its Development 220.94 (ii) Building and other Civil
Constructions 78.33
(iii) Plant & Machinery 1004.68 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 24.58 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
16.40
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
53.04
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 9.72 Total 1407.69
7. Total GoI grant released
Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 27.12.16 402.74 2nd installment on 03.10.18 332.00 3rd installment on 29.08.19 261.425 4th & final installment 07.01.21 103.23
Total 1099.395
8. Validity upto 30.06.20 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to 30.11.20
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*****
159
Agenda Item No. 54.5.9: Ratification of Time Extension granted for completion of project for setting up of CFC in Oil Expeller & Parts Manufacturing Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab.
S.
No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Oil Expeller & Parts Manufacturing Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab
2. Approval accorded 47th SCM held on 25.07.18 3. Final approval order
issued on 28.08.18
4. Name of the IA Policy Implementation Unit (PIU), Chandigarh 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 1350.00 SPV contribution : 168.68
Total : 1518.68
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Building and other Civil
Constructions 120.00
(ii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification)
1296.68
(iii) Misc. fixed assets 18.00 (iv) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
15.00
(v) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
31.00
(vi) Margin money for Working Capital 38.00 Total 1518.68
7. Total GoI grant released
Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 28.06.19 540.00 2nd installment on 20.01.20 405.00 3rd installment on 04.05.20 270.00 4th & final installment on 07.01.21 120.63
Total 1335.63
8. Validity upto 27.08.20 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to 31.12.20
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*****
160
Agenda Item No.: 54.5.10: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Readymade Garments Cluster, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Readymade Garments Cluster, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh
2. Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17 3. Final approval order
issued on 24.05.17
4. Name of the IA Uttar Pradesh Trade Promotion Authority (UPTPA) 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 497.10 Govt. of Uttar Pradesh : 119.83 SPV contribution : 73.67
Total : 690.60
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Land and its Development 17.54 (ii) Building and other Civil
Constructions 151.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery 462.79 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 4.50 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
14.45
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
26.16
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 14.16 Total 690.60
7. Total GoI grant released
Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 23.10.20
198.84
Total 198.84
8. Validity upto 23.05.19 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.03.21
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
161
Agenda Item No.54.5.11: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Zari Zardozi Cluster, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Zari Zardozi Cluster, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh
2. Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17 3. Final approval order
issued on 16.05.17
4. Name of the IA Uttar Pradesh Trade Promotion Authority (UPTPA), Kanpur
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 178.78 Govt. of UP : 22.42 SPV contribution : 22.98
Total : 224.18
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Land and its Development 12.00 (ii) Building and other Civil
Constructions 33.40
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification)
145.14
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 12.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses 4.54
(vi) Contingency (2% building & 5% on plant & machinery)
7.50
(vii) Margin money for working capital 9.60 Total 224.18
7. Total GoI grant released
Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 29.12.20
71.51
Total 71.51
8. Validity upto 15.05.19 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.12.21
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
162
Agenda No.54.6.1: Removal of proposed facilities for setting up of Rice Milling Cluster,
Balasore, Odisha.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of Rice Milling Cluster, Balasore, Odisha
2. Approval accorded 53rd SCM of MSE-CDP held on 14.07.20 3. Final approval order issued
on 15.09.2020
4. Name of IA Odisha Small Industries Corporation Ltd., Cuttack 5. Means of Finance Rs. in lakh
GoI contribution : 1048.62 State Government contribution : 299.61 SPV contribution : 149.80
Total : 1498.03
6. Project costs and component-wise details
(Rs. in lakh) (i) Land : 113.17 (ii) Land development & building : 295.40 (iii) Plant & Machinery : 1077.02 (iv) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses : 12.44
Total : 1498.03
7. Total GoI grant released Nil 8. Facilities approved (i) Solvent extraction from Rice Bran
(ii) Extraction of silica from husk ash (iii)Extraction of oryzanol from rice bran oil and
other agro products (iv) Setting up of ultra-modern mandis for
procurement of paddy and other raw materials as well as sale of rice
(v) De-oiled rice bran & Crude Oil and other by-products.
(vi) Research and Development centers (vii) Common warehousing, marketing, export and
import of finished products and raw material and other such related works as deemed fit by the company from time to time.
9. Facilities proposed to be deleted
(i) Extraction of silica from husk ash (ii) Extraction of oryzanol from rice bran oil and
other agro products (iii)Setting up of ultra-modern mandis for
procurement of paddy and other raw materials as well as sale of rice
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly accorded approval for removal of facilities proposed at para-9.
*****
Minutes of 53rd Meeting of National Level Steering Committee of Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP).
In Chair Secretary (MSME)
Date 14.07.2020
Venue Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi (through Video Conferencing)
List of participants annexed at Annexure-I.
The Chairman National Level Steering Committee, while welcoming the participant mentioned that that Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP) is an important scheme of this Ministry and the State Governments play very vital role in the implementation of the scheme. Further he remarked that:
(i) State Governments should ensure that the ongoing projects are completed within in the stipulated time period and there should not be any delay in the part of any stakeholders.
(ii) The detailing on the progress of completed/ongoing projects needs to be ensured during the deliberations for the new projects.
The Agenda thereafter were taken up.
Agenda Item No. Confirmation of Minutes of previous Steering Committee Meeting 53.1
Minutes were confirmed.
Agenda Item No. Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 53.2
Action taken report was noted.
Agenda Item No. 51.3: Proposals for Final Approval
53.3.1 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) m Jewellery Cluster, Jamnagar, Gujarat.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance.
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 707.48
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 202.14
(iii) SPV contribution 10 l.07
Total 1010.69
~ j.J) Pa e 1 of 17 g
53.3.2 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Nasalapur, Belgaum, Karnataka.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 576.83
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofKarnataka 164.82
(iii) SPY contribution 82.41
Total 824.06
53.3.3 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Grapes & Raisin Processing Cluster, Jamkhandi, Bagalkot, Karnataka.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh S. No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1047.69
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofKarnataka 299.34
(iii) SPY contribution 149.67
Total 1496.70
(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPY (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required) vetted by MSME-DI, Hubli.
(ii) English version of registration of SPY formation signed vetted by MEMEDI.
(iii) Undertakings from the State Government as well as SPY that CFC will not sell the products.
53.3.4 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere, Karnataka.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 500.85
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofKarnataka 143.11
(iii) Spy contribution 71.55 ..
~ Page 2 of 17
Total 715.51
(i) Documentary proof from SPY for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51 % of the cluster members.
(ii) IA needs to submit plan regarding value addition, branding and marketing tie-up to make the project viable.
The above approval is further subjected to: (a) The SPY shall obtain NPOP or PGS Certification as the case may be.
53.3.5 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Power loom Cluster, Chikodi, Belgaum, Karnataka.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance.
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1021.15
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 291.76
(iii) Spy contribution 145.88
Total 1458.79
53.3.6 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Steel Furniture Cluster, Ernakulam, Kerala.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh S. No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 1050.00
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kerala 300.00
(iii) SPY contribution 241.27
Total 1591.27
(i) English version of registered land documents in the name of SPY vetted by MSME-DI, Thrissur.
(ii) Details of SPY bank account is not legible to read. Clear copy required. (iii) Copy of MoA & AoA signed by Board of Directors required. As per
SIDBI appraisal, the AoA of Kalady Steel Consortium Private Ltd. does not have provision for enrolling new members into SPY. A suitable condition regarding inclusion of provision for enrolling new members into the company need to be stipulated.
53.3.7 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Auto and Engineering Cluster, Nagpur, Maharashtra .
. ~ Page 3 of 17
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh
S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 1234.10
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Maharashtra 352.60
(iii) Spy contribution 176.30
Total 1763.00
(i) Certificate from the State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/STlWomen Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ii) Certificate from the State Govt.lSPV to utilize 60% of the installed capacity.
(iii) Commitment letter from the State Government I IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
(iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State Government.
53.3.8 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Rice Milling Cluster, Balasore, Odisha.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance.
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1048.62 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Odisha 299.61 (iii) SPY contribution 149.80
Total 1498.03
53.3.9 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Home Furnishing Cluster, Karur, Tamil Nadu.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1178.99 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 150.70 (iii) SPY contribution 177.51
Total 1507.20
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Spy (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
~ Page 4 of 17
~!!1 ~ .!> UMESH ChANDRA Sri K
~~~ / 0 -.:;c·or
(ii) Certificate from the State Govt.lSPV to utilize 60% of the installed capacity.
(iii) Certificate from the State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(iv) Certificate from the State Pollution Control Board. (v) Share holding Pattern of SPY. (vi) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State
Government.
53.3.10 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Buggapadu, Khammam, Telangana.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 559.25* (ii) Govt.ofTelangana 288.88
Total 848.13 * GoI grant of Rs. 559.25 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.798.93 lakh.
(i) Tangible outcomes of the project In prescribed format from the State Government.
53.3.11 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Kallem, Jangaon, Telangana.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh S. No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 678.88* (ii) Govt.ofTelangana 392.00
Total 1070.88 * GoI grant of Rs. 678.88 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.969.83 lakh.
(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government.
53.3.12 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Autonagar, Kundanpally Village, Ramagundam MandaI in Peddapalli , Telangana.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
~ ~ -q~ ~ •
'MESH C ,AND\<. S >.; ~~ / 0 .",ctor
Page 5 of17
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 656.62* (ii) Govt. of Telangana 334.13
Total 990.75 * Gol grant ofRs. 656.62 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost ofRs.938.04 lakh.
(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government.
53.3.13 Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Autonagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy, Telangana.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance.
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 650.65* (ii) Govt. of Telangana 403.61
Total 1054.26 * Gol grant ofRs. 650.65 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost ofRs.929.50 lakh
53.3.14 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Sultanpur, Sangareddy, Telangana.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 637.70* (ii) Govt. of Telangana 302.35
Total 940.05 * Gol grant ofRs. 637.70 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost ofRs. 911.00 lakh.
(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government.
53.3.15 Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri, Telangana.
Page 6 of 17
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance.
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 484.13*
(ii) Govt. of Telangana 230.04
Total 714.17 *GoI grant of Rs. 484.13 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.691.61 lakh.
53.3.16 (S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Borgaon Textile Manufacturing Cluster, Nippani, Belgaum, Karnataka.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1046.80 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kamataka 299.10 (iii) Spy contribution 149.55
Total 1495.45
53.3.17 (S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Auto and General Engineering Cluster, Chikkodi, Belgaum, Karnataka.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 676.54 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kama taka 193.30 (iii) SPY contribution 96.65
Total 966.49
(i) Documentary proof from Spy for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51 % of the cluster members.
53.3.18 (S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Readymade Garment & Hosiery Cluster, Hiriyur, Chitradurga, Karnataka.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final
~ Page 7 of 17
approval letter. (Rs. in lakh
S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 206.22
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kamataka 59.53 (iii) SPY contribution 31.92
Total 297.67
(i) Documentary proof from Spy for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51 % of the cluster members.
(ii) Details of SPY bank account. 53.3.19 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Boranada Phase-IV, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 407.48* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 589.92
Total 997.40
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 407.48 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost ofRs. 509.35 lakh.
(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.
53.3.20 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Odela, Dholpur, Rajasthan.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 257.06* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 142.98
Total 400.04 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs. 257.06 lakh as 64.25% of eligible project cost of Rs. 400.04 lakh.
(i) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units 10 the
Page 8 of 17
~~ ~ 14 1-\ C ANDRAS
UME.~~ / 0 recto
Industrial Estate are Microl SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFRJCVC guidelines.
53.3.21 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Zadri Falna, Pali, Rajasthan.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. oflndia 308.19*
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 251.58
Total 559.77 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs. 308.19 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost ofRs. 385.24 lakh.
(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRJ CVC guidelines.
53.3.22 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. oflndia 352.00* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 210.87
Total 562.87
*SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs.352.00 lakh as 70% of eligible project cost ofRs. 502.88 lakh.
53.3.23 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Bhinmal, Jalore, Rajasthan.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 415.31* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 205.45
Total 620.76
*SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs. 415.31 lakh as 80% of eligible project
Page 9 of17
cost ofRs. 519.14Iakh.
(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.
53.3.24 (8) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Kekri, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakb) 8. No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 267.05*
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 188.56
Total 455.61 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant ofRs. 267.05 lakh as 58.61% of eligible project cost ofRs. 455.61 lakh.
(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.
53.3.25 (8) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Mandore, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakb) 8. No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 417.89* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 158.02
Total 575.91 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs. 417.89 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost ofRs. 522.37Iakh.
(i) Certificate from the State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are Micro/ SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ii) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.
53.3.26 (8) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Nimbahera, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
~
'i3"1lw i:f ~ ~- UMESf-i C NORA SHl
f~w-..., / ~ - eto Page 10 of 17
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 277.27*
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 248.05
Total 525.32 *SlDBl recommended Gol grant of Rs. 277.27 lakh as 52.78% of eligible project cost of Rs. 525.32 lakh.
(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.
53.3.27 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Renwal, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 193.00* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 139.78
Total 332.78 *SlDBl recommended Gol grant of Rs. 193.00 lakh as 58% of eligible project cost ofRs. 332.78 lakh.
(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.
53.3.28(S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Mehsana, Gujarat.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 954.07
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 119.26 (iii) Spy contribution 119.26
Total 1192.59
Page 11 of 17
(i) Uploading of SPY members details on MSE-CDP Portal. (ii) Opening of Project Specific Account in schedule A Bank by IA.
53.3.29 (S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Lab Grown Diamond Cluster, Surat, Gujarat.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakb) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. oflndia 1585.36
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 198.17
(iii) SPY contribution 198.17
Total 1981.70
(i) Opening of Project Specific Account in schedule A Bank by IA.
53.3.30 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Uranganpatti, Madurai, Tamil Nadu.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakb) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 573.00*
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 382.00
Total 955.00 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs. 573.00 lakh is 60% of total eligible project cost ofRs.955.00 lakh.
(i) Land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required. (ii) Copy of approved Layout plan. (iii)Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation
cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (iv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFRJCVC
guidelines. (v) TANSIDCO, Chennai should consider laying of roads with Cement
Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Tamil Nadu/ TANSIDCO.
(vi)Cost of land filing & leveling should be funded by State share. (vii) Revalidation of the SIDBI Appraisal Report by SIDBI. (viii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of
estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Page 12 of 17
(ix)Constitution of State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the Projects.
(x) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State Government.
53.3.31 (S) Setting of up of New Industrial Estate at Perundurai, Erode District, Tamil Nadu.
The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 207.00* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 147.00
Total 354.00 *SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 207.00 lakh is 60% of total eligible project cost ofRs.346.00 lakh.
(i) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
(ii) T ANSIDCO, Chennai should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built III a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Tamil Nadu/ TANSIDCO.
(iii) Cost of land filing & leveling should be funded by State share. (iv) Revalidation of the SIDBI Appraisal Report by SIDB!. (v) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of
component costs as per format provided. (vi) Constitution of State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor the
progress of implementation of the Projects. (vii) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State
Government. 53.3.32 (S) Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Kurukalpatti, Tirunelveli, Tamil
Nadu. The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 343.20*
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 306.80 Total 650.00
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 343.20 lakh is 60% of total eligible project cost of Rs.S72.00 lakh.
Page 13 of 17
(i) T ANSIDCO, Chennai should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete III place of Bituminous and proper drainages built III a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Tamil NaduJ TANSIDCO.
(ii) Cost of land filing & leveling should be funded by State share. (iii) Revalidation of the SIDBI Appraisal Report by SIDBI. (iv) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of
component costs as per format provided. (v) Constitution of State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor the
progress of implementation of the Projects. (vi) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State
Government.
Agenda Item No. Ratification of Decisions 53.4
Steering Committee also ratified following time extension:
Agenda Item Proposal Project Validity No. Extended upto
53.4.1 Up gradation of infrastructure facilities at Amingaon 31.12.20 Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) III Karnrup (Metro) District, Assam.
53.4.2 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Pathsala, District 31.03.20 Barpeta, Assam.
53.4.3 Setting up of CFC in Furniture Cluster, Thrissur, Kerala. 31.12.20 53.4.4 Setting up of CFC in Plywood Cluster, ldukki, Ernakularn, 10.10.21
Kerala 53.4.5 Setting up of CFC in Gota Zari Lace Cluster, Ajrner, Rajasthan 31.03.2 I
Agenda Item No. Any Other proposals 53.5 53.5.1 Re-allocation of funds in respect of up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in
Focal Point, Phase-IV, Ludhiana, Punjab. The Steering Committee accorded approval for Re-allocation of funds, subject to submission of comments from SIDBI on earlier appraised Project.
53.5.2 Re-allocation of funds in respect of up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Jalandhar, Punjab. The Steering Committee accorded approval for Re-allocation of funds, subject to submission of comments from SIDBI on earlier appraised Project
53.5.3 Setting up of Integrated Infrastructure Development (IID) Centre at Raikot, Ludhiana, Punjab. The Steering Committee accorded approval for Reverting the decision of 40tn
SCM for refund of GoI grant of Rs. 100.00 lakh from PSIEC and directed to the State Government to complete the project on or before 31.12.20. The balance grant would be released on reimbursement basis, subject to
Page 14 of17
submission of Joint Verification Report and other .. documents requisite vetted/verified by MSME-DI, Ludhiana. The State Government will ensure that the requisite documents are submitted well in time, so that GoI Grant is released during current financial year (2020-21).
53.6 Extension of Time Project Validity Extended upto
53.6.1 (S) Setting up of CFC in Global Puffed Rice Cluster, 30.04.21 Holalkere Road, Chitradurga, Karnataka.
While concluding the meeting, the committee was of the view that State Governments shall give more priority to Flatted Factory Complexes as compared to Setting up of New Industrial Estates / Upgradation of Industrial Estates.
Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair and participants.
*********
Page 15 of 17
Annexure-I List of participants in the 53rd Steering Committee Meeting of MSE-CDP on 14.07.2020 at New Delhi.
S.No. Name & Designation Office S I Shri I Ms
1. A.K. Sharma, Secretary, MSME In Chair 2. Devendra Kumar Singh, AS&DC(MSME) 010 DC (MSME) 3. Sudhir Garg, Joint Secretary M/o MSME 4. Piyush Srivastava, Additional Development 010 DC (MSME)
Commissioner 5. R.K. Rai, Secretary, BEE M/o Power 6. Manoj Kumar Saraswat, Director 010 DC(MSME) 7. U.C. Shukla, Director 010 DC(MSME) 8. D. K. Katara, Director 010 DC(MSME) 9. Pratiyush Mishra SIDBI, New Delhi. 10. Dr. K. Ellangovan, Principal Secretary Department of Industries & Commerce,
Government of Kerala. 11. Jayesh Ranjan, Principal Secretary Department of Industries & Commerce,
Govt.ofTelangana. 12. Dr. K. Gopal, Principal Secretary Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Department, Government of Tamil Nadu.
13. Premkumar V.R. Director of Industries & Commerce, Government of Kerala.
14. Archana Singh, Commissioner Industries Department of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Rasjasthan.
15. Solmon Raju, Joint Director Commissioner of Industries, Govt. of Telangana.
16. Amulya Ratna Panda, Dy. Director Director of Industries, Govt. of Odisha. 17. Biranchi Narayan Sahoo, Industrial Supervisor Director of Industries, Government of
Odisha 18. Ranjeet Kumar, Commissioner Industries Commissioner of Industries,
Government of Gujarat. 19. A. P. Dharmadhikari, Joint Director Office of Development Commissioner,
Govt. of Maharashtra. 20. M. Palanivel, Director (l/c) MSME-DI, Thrissur 21. G. Velladurai, Dy. Director (I/c) ICDO MSME-DI, Thrissur 22. Milind Barapatre, Director (l/c) MSME-Dl, Bangalore 23. R. Gopinath Rao, Dy. Director MSME-DI, Hubli 24. Akadas, Director MSME-DI, Bangalore 25. D. Chandra Sekha, AlA MSME-DI, Hyderabad. 26. Naveen Kumar, Investigator MSME-DI, Hyderabad. 27. R.K. Parmar, Dy. Director MSME-DI, Ludhiana 28. Deepak Chechi, Assistant Director I CDO MSME-DI, Ludhiana 29. V.K. Sharma, Director MSME-DI, Jaipur 30. Ajay SharmalCDO MSME-DI, Jaipur 31. S.K. Sahoo, Director(I1c) MSME-DI, Cuttack. 32. Damodara Behera, Assistant Director MSME-DI, Cuttack
~ Page 16 of17
S.No. Name & Designation Office S I Shri I Ms
33. Suresh Babu Ji, Director (l/C) MSME-DI, Chennai. 34. Dharmsilvam, Dy. Director MSME-DI, Chennai. 35. Chandra Prabhu, Assistant Director MSME-DI, Chennai. 36. K.H.Shah, Director (l/c) MSME-DI,AJunedabad 37. P.B.Parmar, Dy. Director MSME-DI, Ahmedabad 38. P.M. Parlewar, Director MSME-DI, Nagpur. 39. B. Mahesh, Managing Director KCTU, Bangalore 40. H.S. Jaykumar Joint Director Technical Cell, C&I secretariat, Govt.
of Kamataka. 41. E.V. Narasirnha Reddy, VC&MD Telangana State Industrial
Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) 42. V. Madhusudhan, CEO Telangana State Industrial
Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) 43. Sumeet Jarangall Managing Director Punjab Small Industries & Export
Corporation Ltd., Chandigarh. 44. R.S. Bains, Chief Engineer PSIEC 45. Ashutosh Pednekar, Managing Director RIICO 46. Rajendra Singh, General Manager RIICO 47. Sanjay Paul, CEO EDII, Ahmedabad. 48. Mayur Gupta, CEO Balasore Rice Mill Cluster. 49. Dheer Singh, Assistant Director 0/0 DC(MSME) 50. P.V. Suresh Babu, Assistant Director 0/0 DC(MSME) 51. Sanjay Nigam, Assistant Director 0/0 DC(MSME) 52. Charanjeet Singh, Assistant Director 0/0 DC(MSME)
********
Page 17 of 17