AGENDA - JUMPO€¦ · Ms. Peggy Holland, Mr. Roy Bredahl, Ms. Stephanie Kutz, Mr. Tim Akers, Mr. Patrick Flanagan, Mr. Chris White , Mr. Ron Lucas I. Call to Order Mr. Ben Warren

AGENDA

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE

February 11, 2016 – 10:30 AM

Jacksonville City Hall, Johnson Boulevard Conference Room

I. Call to Order Ben Warren

II. Welcome and Introductions Ben Warren

III. Public Comment Ben Warren

Action Items

IV. November 12, 2015 Meeting Minutes (Attachment 1) Ben Warren

Recommended Action: Approval of meeting minutes

V. Self-Certification (Attachment 2) Peggy Holland

Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the TAC

VI. Draft FY 2017 UPWP (Attachment 3) Peggy Holland


VII. Draft FY 2016-2025 TIP Amendment 2 (Attachment 4) Peggy Holland


VIII. Draft Local Prioritization Input Methodology (Attachment 5) Peggy Holland


Reports/Comments

IX. Report from MPO Anthony Prinz

X. Report from NCDOT Division 3 Patrick Riddle

XI. Report from NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch Nazia Sarder

XII. Report from FHWA Field Officer Ron Lucas

XIII. Questions, Closing Comments Ben Warren

Attachment: 1 Technical Coordinating Committee

Action Required

To: Technical Coordinating Committee From: Peggy Holland, Senior Transportation Planner Subject: November 12, 2015 Meeting Minutes

2/11/2016

Recommended Action: Approval of meeting minutes Attachments: November 12, 2015 TCC meeting minutes

JACKSONVILLE METROPOLITIAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA November 12, 2015 10:30 a.m.

JOHNSON BOULEVARD CONFERENCE ROOM

Present: Mr. Ben Warren, Mr. Reginald Goodson, Ms. Carol Long, Ms. Nazia Sarder, Mr. Patrick Riddle (for Ms. Karen Collette), Mr. Ron Massey

Absent: Others Present:

Mr. Wally Hansen, Ms. Sheila Pierce Knight Ms. Peggy Holland, Mr. Roy Bredahl, Ms. Stephanie Kutz, Mr. Tim Akers, Mr. Patrick Flanagan, Mr. Chris White , Mr. Ron Lucas

I. Call to Order Mr. Ben Warren called the TCC meeting to order at 10:36 am, Thursday, November 12, 2015 in the Johnson Boulevard Conference Room at City Hall.

Mr. Warren welcomed everyone to the meeting, including the new FHWA representative, Mr. Ron Lucas.

III. Public Comment Mr. Warren asked if there were any public comments. No public comments were made. Action Items IV. September 10, 2015 Meeting Minutes Mr. Warren asked for a motion to approve the September 10, 2015 Meeting Minutes. Mr. Patrick Riddle moved to approve the September 10, 2015 Meeting Minutes. Mr. Reggie Goodson seconded the motion. The motion to approve the September 10, 2015 Meeting Minutes was unanimously approved by the Committee Members present.

II. Welcome and Introductions

V. Draft Prospectus Ms. Peggy Holland introduced the updated Prospectus noting that the document hadn’t been updated since 2001. She stated the reason for the updated document is to remain aligned with both federal and state requirements. For the most part, the Prospectus lays out who is responsible for what and is the roadmap to the MPO’s UPWP. Ms. Holland noted that the recommended action is to suggest adoption to the TAC. She asked for comments or questions.

Mr. Tim McCrurry made a comment on the chart included in the Prospectus asking what amount of participation is required for the TCC meetings. Ms. Holland addressed the question, noting that members from MCIEAST are not voting members of the TCC and are therefore not required to attend all meetings, but their input and participation is welcomed and appreciated.

Mr. Reggie Goodson followed by asking a question regarding TIA involvement in the Prospectus. Ms. Holland responded that TIA is more of a City responsibility than MPO responsibility.

Mr. Warren asked for a motion to recommend approval to the TAC. Ms. Carol Long moved to approve the action and Ms. Nazia Sarder seconded the motion.

The motion to recommend approval of the Prospectus to the TAC was unanimously approved by the Committee members present.

VI. Draft UPWP Ms. Holland stated that the draft was originally due December 31 and has been pushed back and is now due January 31. However, because of the calendar adjustments, the MPO is still submitting in December and will have a final to present at the February meeting. She stated that the UPWP was without a subcommittee and we need input on FY 2019 in the Five Year Planning Calendar. She noted that in FY 2017 the Collector Street Plan will be updated in-house and a consultant will be hired to update the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, which will potentially continue on into FY 2018. She continued onto FY 2019 asking if there were any desires of the Committee regarding small area studies or corridor studies. She noted that in FY 2019 Jacksonville will be hosting the NCAMPO Conference which will require a lot of staff time. The Committee agreed to use a place holder consisting of a small area study or corridor study for FY 2019. Additionally, she noted that there was an increase in the amount of funding from FY 2016 to FY 2017. Ms. Holland stated the recommended action for the Draft UPWP is to recommend approval to the TAC. Mr. Warren asks for a motion to recommend approval to the TAC. Ms. Nazia Sarder moved to approve the action and Mr. Patrick Riddle seconded the motion. The motion to recommend approval of the Draft UPWP to the TAC was unanimously approved by the Committee members present.

Discussion Items VII. Prioritization 4.0 Ms. Holland stated that she is in the process of submitting projects into the P4 system and that there have been some issues with the system, which are in the process of being fixed. She also noted that the system is giving back some high dollar amounts for projects, which Mr. Riddle mentioned is a good thing. Ms. Holland then went into what the next steps are for the process. She mentioned the next thing on the list is creating a Local Input Methodology, noting whether or not to simply tweak the old methodology or completely rewrite it. Additionally, she noted that the Statewide Project List is supposed to be released a few days before the first of April and there will be a 60 day public comment period for the assignment of local input points to Regional projects. Once the Regional Project List is released there will be a second public comment period for the assignment of local input points to Division projects. Ms. Holland also noted that there has been some additional funding awarded, potentially, to 4 projects. Two of those will not need to be reprioritized and two will. The two that will not need to be reprioritized include the project at Western and Gum Branch and the Commerce Drive Extension project. The two that will fall in the last 5 years and will be reprioritized include the Multimodal Center and the Henderson widening and extension project. Lastly, Mr. Tim Akers discussed an issue with the Wilson Gate. He noted that there have been several crashes involving the concrete median on NC 24 headed towards Bell Fork Rd and asked about potentially putting up tube delineators to help drivers avoid the median. Mr. Riddle noted that he will need to speak with Katie or Jessi of NCDOT.

VIII. Onslow CTP

Ms. Nazia Sarder introduced the Onslow County CTP. She gave an overview of what the CTP is as well as the process that goes into creating a CTP. She noted that it is a long range plan that is not fiscally constrained. She presented examples of CTP maps, some of those included were bike maps, pedestrian maps and public transportation maps. Additionally, she noted that the CTP is updated every 5 years. The newest update will have a base year of 2015 and will include the LRTP. Finally, she gave a brief update up where the Onslow County CTP update currently stands and noted it should be adopted in March of 2017. Reports/Comments IX. Report from MPO Administrator Ms. Holland went over the 2016 meeting calendar noting the changes in months from the normal schedule to align with important milestones this year.

X. Report from NCDOT Division 3 Mr. Patrick Riddle gave his report, noting a few projects on his list. Specifically, the bridge replacement in Surf City and the culvert project at NC 24 and Western Blvd. He also mentioned two upcoming public meetings, one on November 19 and one of December 3. XI. Report from NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch

Ms. Nazia Sarder noted that within TPB there have been some positions cut but that they have been reworked into NCDOT.

XII. Report from FHWA Field Officer

Mr. Ron Lucas noted there has been some reorganization in the FHWA. He also mentioned that he is still involved with project development and with streamlining the Merger Process.

XII. Questions, Closings Comments

Mr. Warren asks for additional questions and comments. Mr. McCrurry asked a question regarding the Douglas Rd. project, which Mr. Riddle noted that he would check on the project standing. Mr. Akers also asked a question regarding potential bus stops in Northwoods. Mr. Roy Bredahl responded, noting that the buses are too large to navigate those streets.

Mr. Warren asked the committee for additional questions or comments.

Mr. Warren asked for a motion to adjourn the meeting.

Ms. Carol Long moved to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Patrick Riddle seconded the motion.

The meeting was adjourned at 11:38 a.m.


Action Required To: Technical Coordinating Committee From: Peggy Holland, Senior Transportation Planner Subject: FY 17 Annual Self-Certification

2/11/2016 The Jacksonville Metropolitan Planning Organization is responsible for performing a continuing, cooperative and comprehensive, “3-C,” transportation planning process for the Jacksonville Urbanized Area. The MPO must annually certify that our transportation planning process is being conducted in accordance with federal regulations. Please review the attached checklist, which demonstrates our efforts to carry out the transportation planning process in accordance with federal regulations. Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the TAC Attachments: Self-certification checklist and supporting resolution

Self-Certification Checklist 1. Is the MPO properly designated by agreement between the Governor and 75% of the

urbanized area, including the central city, and in accordance in procedures set forth in state and local law (if applicable)? [23 U.S.C. 134 (b); 49 U.S.C. 5303 (c); 23 CFR 450.306 (a)]

Yes 2. Does the policy board include elected officials, major modes of transportation providers and

appropriate state officials? [23 U.S.C. 134 (b); 49 U.S.C. 5303 (c); 23 CF R 450.306 (i)] Yes, Jacksonville MPO policies are crafted by a Transportation Advisory Committee and Technical Coordinating Committee that consist of elected officials, staff representatives from local government agencies and military installations, representatives from local transportation agencies, the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the North Carolina Board of Transportation.

3. Does the MPO boundary encompass the existing urbanized area and the contiguous area expected to become urbanized within the 20-yr forecast period? [23 U.S.C. 134 (c), 49 U.S.C. 5303 (d); 23 CFR 450.308 (a)]

Yes, the MPO boundary was expanded to encompass existing and projected urbanized areas of Onslow County based on the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census.

4. Is there a currently adopted Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)? 23 CFR 450.308 a. Is there an adopted prospectus - Yes b. Are tasks and products clearly outlined - Yes c. Is the UPWP consistent with the LRTP - Yes d. Is the work identified in the UPWP completed in a timely fashion - Yes

5. Does the area have a valid transportation planning process? 23 U.S.C. 134; 23 CFR 450

a. Is the transportation planning process continuous, cooperative and comprehensive - Yes

b. Is there a valid LRTP – Yes, adopted April 2015 c. Did the LRTP have at least a 20-year horizon at the time of adoption - Yes d. Does it address the 8-planning factors - Yes e. Does it cover all modes applicable to the area - Yes f. Is it financially constrained - Yes g. Does it include funding for the maintenance and operation of the system - Yes h. Does it conform to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) (if applicable) – N/A i. Is it updated/reevaluated in a timely fashion (at least every 4 or 5 years) – Yes, the

LRTP was updated in 2015. 6. Is there a valid TIP? 23 CFR 450.324, 326, 328, 330, 332

a. Is it consistent with the LRTP - Yes b. Is it fiscally constrained - Yes c. Is it developed cooperatively with the state and local transit operators - Yes d. Is it updated at least every 4-yrs and adopted by the MPO and the Governor - Yes

7. Does the area have a valid CMP? (TMA only) 23 CFR 450.320 – n/a a. Is it consistent with the LRTP - n/a b. Was it used for the development of the TIP – n/a c. Is it monitored and reevaluated to meet the needs of the area – n/a

8. Does the area have a process for including environmental mitigation discussions in the planning process?

a. Because of our proximity to sensitive environmental resources, our discussions with the TAC, TCC and the community at large focus on potential environmental impacts

of transportation projects. The NCDOT Merger process also considers the environmental impacts of transportation construction projects in detail.

9. Does the planning process meet the following requirements: a. 23 U.S.C. 134, 49 U.S.C. 5303, and this subpart; - Yes b. In nonattainment and maintenance areas, sections 174 and 176 (c) and (d) of the

Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7504, 7506 (c) and (d)) and 40 CFR part 93; - n/a

c. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1) and 49 CFR part 21; - Yes, in January of 2012 the TAC adopted updated Title VI compliance policies and documents which are currently being implemented.

d. 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age in employment or business opportunity - Yes

e. Section 1101(b) of the SAFETEA-LU (Pub. L. 109-59) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects; - Yes

f. 23 CFR part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts; - Yes

g. The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and 49 CFR parts 27, 37, and 38; - Yes

h. The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; - Yes

i. Section 324 of title 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and - Yes

j. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities. - Yes

k. All other applicable provisions of Federal law. (i.e. Executive Order 12898) - Yes 10. Does the area have an adopted PIP/Public Participation Plan? 23 CRR 450.316 (b)(1)

a. Did the public participate in the development of the PIP? Yes, the public was invited to participate in our most recent update to the Public Participation Plan.

b. Was the PIP made available for public review for at least 45-days prior to adoption? – Yes, online and in-print at Jacksonville City Hall.

c. Is adequate notice provided for public meetings? - Yes d. Are meetings held at convenient times and at accessible locations? - Yes e. Is the public given an opportunity to provide oral and/or written comments on the

planning process? - Yes f. Is the PIP periodically reviewed and updated to ensure its effectiveness? – Yes g. Are plans/program documents available in an electronic accessible format, i.e. MPO

website? - Yes 11. Does the area have a process for including environmental, state, other transportation,

historical, local land use and economic development agencies in the planning process? SAFETEA-LU

a. We actively solicit comment from these key stakeholder agencies when developing transportation plans and through implementation of our Public Participation Plan. The NCDOT Merger process also includes many of these groups in the environmental permitting process for transportation construction projects.

RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN

PLANNING ORGANIZATION’S TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS FOR FY 2017

A motion was made by ___________________ and seconded by ____________________ for

adoption of the following resolution, and upon being put to a vote, was duly adopted.

WHEREAS, the Transportation Advisory Committee has found the Jacksonville Urban Area

Metropolitan Planning Organization is conducting transportation planning in a continuous,

cooperative and comprehensive manner in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 49 U.S.C. 1607; and

WHEREAS, the Transportation Advisory Committee has found the Transportation Planning

Process to be in full compliance with the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Title VI

Assurance executed by each State under 23 U.S.C. 324 and 29 U.S.C. 794; and

WHEREAS, the Transportation Advisory Committee has considered how the Transportation

Planning Process will affect the involvement of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in FHWA and

FTA funded planning projects (Sec. 105(f), Pub. L. 97-424, 96 Stat. 2100, 49 CFR Part 23); and

WHEREAS, the Transportation Advisory Committee has considered how the Transportation

Planning Process will affect the elderly and the disabled per the provisions of the Americans with

Disabilities Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327, as amended) and the U.S. DOT

implementing regulations; and

WHEREAS, the Long Range Transportation Plan for Jacksonville Urban Area has a planning

horizon year of at least 20 years and meets all requirements for an adequate plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Transportation Advisory Committee that the

transportation planning process for the Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

is certified and meets the criteria as specified above; and this resolution shall be in full force and

effect from and after its adoption this the 10th day of March, 2016.

________________________________

Michael A. Lazzara, Chairman Subscribed and sworn to me this _____ day of ____________ 2016. ____________________________________ Notary Public My commission expires ____________________.


Action Required

To: Technical Coordinating Committee From: Peggy Holland, Senior Transportation Planner Subject: Draft FY 2017 UPWP

2/11/2016

Each year the Jacksonville MPO produces a Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) to outline expenditures necessary to carry out planning activities by the MPO and its member agencies during the upcoming fiscal year. NCDOT requires the UPWP be adopted and submitted by March 31 for the coming fiscal year. The draft FY 2017 UPWP is similar to the prior year and is created to further the operational objectives identified by the 2010 strategic prioritization workshop. The work program accounts for all direct operating expenses and includes funding for consultant services to complete a Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, provide on-call professional services and to complete work on the Transportation Improvement Program. The draft work program has been advertised in accordance with Public Participation Plan requirements. Recommended Action: Recommend adoption of the draft FY 2017 UPWP Attachment: Draft FY 2017 UPWP

Lead Planning AgencyCity of Jacksonville

North Carolina

Unified Planning Work ProgramFY 2017

Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Prepared by the Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization www.jumpo-nc.org

Draft

FY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM - Draft Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM

FISCAL YEAR 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction 1

Five Year Planning Calendar 3

Budget Summary 4

Unified Planning Work Program Table 6

Section 104 (f) PL Work Task Narrative 7

Section 5303 Work Task Narrative 13

Section 5307 Work Task Narrative 14

DBE Contracting Opportunities Table 15

Resolution of Approval -

Draft


INTRODUCTION

The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is a document that outlines planning activities for the Jacksonville MPO during each fiscal year using funds provided by federal and state transportation agencies as well as local MPO contributions from the City of Jacksonville and Onslow County. UPWPs are adopted prior to the beginning of each fiscal year and serve as the program for coordinating MPO activities with the goal of developing an integrated program that addresses current and future mobility needs of our region. Many tasks contained within the UPWP are required by federal or state law and are ongoing from year-to-year. Some of these reoccurring tasks include conducting Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) and Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) meetings, maintaining a current Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program, long-range transportation planning and implementing our Public Participation Plan. Other planning initiatives contained within the UPWP vary from year-to-year. For instance, the scope of special projects completed by the MPO to address specific areas of transportation concern (such as small area plans, modal plans or corridor studies) change on an annual basis. This document blends ongoing and year-to-year activities into a cohesive program that builds consensus among federal, state and local stakeholders regarding MPO operations and budgetary needs.

Transportation Advisory Committee Members: Mr. Michael Lazzara, Chairman, Jacksonville City Council Mr. Jack Bright, Vice-Chairman, Onslow County Commission Mr. Robert Warden, Jacksonville City Council Mr. Paul Buchanan, Onslow County Commission Ms. Sandra Fountain, North Carolina Board of Transportation

Technical Coordinating Committee Members: Mr. Ben Warren, Chairman, Planning and Development Director, Onslow County Mr. Reginald Goodson, Vice-Chairman, Development Services Director, City of Jacksonville Mr. Ronald Massey, Deputy City Manager, City of Jacksonville Mr. David Cotton, Deputy County Manager, Onslow County Mr. Wally Hansen, Public Services Director, City of Jacksonville Ms. Carol Hurst Long, Executive Director, Onslow United Transit System Ms. Sheila Pierce Knight, Executive Director, Jacksonville-Onslow Economic Development Ms. Karen Collette, Division 3 Engineer, NCDOT Ms. Nazia Sarder, Jacksonville MPO Coordinator, NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch This UPWP has been developed in accordance with the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act or MAP-21, which requires a planning process that is continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive for making transportation investment decisions in metropolitan areas. MAP-21 also encourages MPOs to consult with planning officials responsible for other types of planning activities affected by transportation, including areas

Draft


pertaining to land development, environmental protection, economic development, etc. The Jacksonville MPO strives to maintain a cooperative relationship with all of our local planning partners by including them as members of our TCC. Understanding that transportation issues impact all of these areas of concern, MPO staff works to balance these needs throughout our planning process. MAP-21 requires the metropolitan planning process to provide for consideration of projects and strategies that will:

1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;

2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users;

3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users;

4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight; 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the

quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns;

6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight;

7. Promote efficient system management and operation; and 8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

Each work element within the UPWP satisfies at least one of these eight factors. Further, planning activities associated with each work element emanate from and support the goals of the Jacksonville Metropolitan Planning Organization’s 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, which was adopted by the TAC in April 2015. Citizen involvement is a vital component of MAP-21 compliance. As such, resources and activities have been included in this UPWP to implement the Jacksonville MPO Public Participation Plan. As a component of our Public Participation Plan, the Jacksonville MPO website will be maintained on a regular basis to broadcast information on MPO activities and to encourage community involvement in the MPO process. The MPO will also proactively notify citizens of plans and activities on a regular basis through public notices, press releases and other commonly used media outlets and public presentations. All MPO plans and programs comply with the public participation provisions of Title VI which states: “[n]o person in the United States shall, on grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance."

Draft


FIVE YEAR PLANNING CALENDAR

FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021

July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017

July 1, 2017 - June 30, 2018

July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019

July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019

July 1, 2019 - June 30, 2020

Planning Process Action

UPWP Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Certification of Planning Process Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Products of the Planning Process

LRTP Review Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Major Update Start 2045 LRTP

Adopt 2045 LRTP

Special Studies / State & Regional Planning

Collector Street Plan/Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan

Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan

Corridor/Small Area Study LRTP Update LRTP Update

Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)

Project Prioritization Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Draft MTIP Yes Yes Yes Adopt MTIP Yes Yes

Draft

FY 2016 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM - Draft 4 JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

BUDGET SUMMARY

Revenue Funding the Jacksonville MPO is a collaborative effort among federal, state and local transportation stakeholders. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) provide 80% of MPO operating funds, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) provides 2% and local MPO member agencies (City of Jacksonville and Onslow County) provide 18%. FHWA funds (commonly known as Section 104(f) PL) are administered by the NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch (TPB) and require a 20% local match. The North Carolina Section 104 (f) PL funding apportionment is distributed to MPOs by the TPB through a population-based formula. Section 104(f) PL funding levels are based on MAP-21 authorization. Fiscal Year 2017 Section 104(f) PL revenue summary:

FHWA (80%) $ 236,000 Local (20%) $ 59,000 Total $ 295,000

Metropolitan Planning Program funds from the FTA (commonly known as Section 5303) are intended to provide assistance to urbanized areas for planning and technical studies in support of public transportation services. The North Carolina Section 5303 funding apportionment is distributed to MPOs by the NCDOT Public Transportation Division (PTD) through a formula based on transit operating statistics. Section 5303 funds require a 10% local match, which is provided by the City of Jacksonville, and a 10% state match, which is provided by PTD. Section 5303 funding levels are also based on MAP-21 authorization. Revenues for this work program reflect the Fiscal Year 2017 authorization from PTD. Fiscal Year 2017 Section 5303 revenue summary:

FTA (80%) $ 28,000 NCDOT - PTD (10%) $ 3,500 Local (10%) $ 3,500 Total $ 35,000

Draft


Urbanized Area Formula Program funds from the FTA (commonly known as Section 5307) are intended to provide operating assistance to urbanized areas for providing public transportation services. For use in supporting transit planning initiatives, Section 5307 funds require a 10% local match, which is provided by the City of Jacksonville, and a 10% state match, which is provided by PTD. Section 5307 funding levels are also based on MAP-21 authorization. Revenues for this work program reflect the Federal Fiscal Year 2017 authorization from FTA. Fiscal Year 2017 Section 5307 revenue summary:

FTA (80%) $36,000 NCDOT - PTD (10%) $4,500 Local (10%) $4,500 Total $45,000

A composite summary of Jacksonville MPO revenues for the Fiscal Year 2017 work program is provided below:

Revenue Source Total Amount Percent of Total Section 104 (f) PL (federal) $224,000 62% Section 5303 (federal) $28,000 8% Section 5307 $36,000 10% NCDOT Local

$8,000 $64,000

2% 18%

Total $360,000 100%

Expenditures Fiscal Year 2017 work program expenditures are expected to match our projected revenues. A detailed summary of our anticipated expenditures is provided by the FY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program Table, Section 104(f) PL work task narrative, Section 5303/5307 work task narratives and DBE contracting opportunities table.

Draft

Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning OrganizationDRAFT FY 2017 Planning Work Program: Funding Sources Table

Local FHWA Local NCDOT FTA Local NCDOT FTA20% 80% 10% 10% 80% 10% 10% 80%

II-A Data & Planning SupportII-A-1 Networks & Support Systems $750 $3,000 $3,500 $3,500 $28,000 $4,500 $4,500 $36,000 $8,750 $8,000 $67,000 $83,750 $81,750 $2,000 1

II-A-2 Travelers and Behavior $250 $1,000 $250 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250II-A-3 Transportation Modeling $250 $1,000 $250 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250

II-B Planning ProcessII-B-1 Targeted Planning $1,000 $4,000 $1,000 $0 $4,000 $5,000 $5,000II-B-2 Regional Planning $1,250 $5,000 $1,250 $0 $5,000 $6,250 $6,250II-B-3 Special Studies $25,000 $100,000 $25,000 $0 $100,000 $125,000 $35,000 $90,000 5

III-A Unified Planning Work ProgramIII-A-1 Unified Planning Work Program $1,250 $5,000 $1,250 $0 $5,000 $6,250 $6,250III-A-2 Metrics & Performance Measures $1,250 $5,000 $1,250 $0 $5,000 $6,250 $6,250

III-B Transportation Improvement ProgramIII-B-1 Prioritization $1,250 $5,000 $1,250 $0 $5,000 $6,250 $6,250III-B-2 Metropolitan TIP $2,250 $9,000 $2,250 $0 $9,000 $11,250 $11,250III-B-3 Merger & Project Development $2,500 $10,000 $2,500 $0 $10,000 $12,500 $12,500

III-C Civil Rights Compliance & Other Regulatory RequirementsIII-C-1 Title VI $250 $1,000 $250 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250III-C-2 Environmental Justice $250 $1,000 $250 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250III-C-3 Minority Business Enterprise $250 $1,000 $250 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250III-C-4 Planning for the Elderly & Disabled $250 $1,000 $250 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250III-C-5 Safety/Drug Control Planning $250 $1,000 $250 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250III-C-6 Public Participation $4,000 $16,000 $4,000 $0 $16,000 $20,000 $7,000 $12,000 2 $1,000 3

III-C-7 Private Sector Participation $250 $1,000 $250 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250

III-D Statewide & Extra-regional PlanningIII-D Statewide & Extra-regional Planning $4,000 $16,000 $4,000 $0 $16,000 $20,000 $14,000 $6,000 4

III-E Management, Operations, & Program Support AdministrationIII-E Management, Operations, & Program Support Administration $12,500 $50,000 $12,500 $0 $50,000 $62,500 $56,200 $6,300 6

TOTALS $59,000 $236,000 $3,500 $3,500 $28,000 $4,500 $4,500 $36,000 $67,000 $8,000 $300,000 $375,000 $257,700 $26,300 $91,000

1 JUMPO street inventory $2,000 On-Call Engineering Services $20,000 Supplies $2,0002 Advertising and Printing $12,000 Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan $70,000 Phones $2,7003 JUMPO webpage management fee $1,000 5 Total $90,000 Memberships $9504 Travel and Training $6,000 Fuel/Vehicle $650

6 Total $6,300

TASK DESCRIPTIONTASK CODE

TransitMPO Staff

Direct Expenses

EXPENDITURES SUMMARY SEC. 104 (f) PL SECTION 5303 SECTION 5307 TASK FUNDING SUMMARYConsultant

Outside Contract

LOCAL STATE FEDERAL TOTAL

FY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM - DRAFTJACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 6

Draf

t


SECTION 104 (F) PL WORK TASK NARRATIVE

(Work to be performed by Jacksonville MPO staff except where noted.) II-A Data and Planning Support II-A-1 Networks and Support Systems

Traffic Volume Counts o MPO staff will collect traffic count data on a regular basis. NCDOT traffic counts

will be used to supplement the counts collected by staff. Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT)

o Vehicle miles of travel is tabulated annually by NCDOT. MPO staff will evaluate data.

Street System Changes o MPO staff will assist with updating the City of Jacksonville’s street system

database as needed to reflect existing and new street infrastructure. Traffic Crashes

o MPO staff will collect, summarize and evaluate traffic crash data for planning projects as well as inquiries from the general public.

Transit System Data o MPO staff will collect and report on data throughout the year to meet the

reporting requirements for Jacksonville Transit. Air Travel

o Data will be collected and analyzed throughout the year on the impact of local air travel on the transportation system.

Central Area Parking Inventory o Inventories of both on and off street parking will be maintained.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Inventory o MPO staff will work with city planners and engineers to update the bicycle and

pedestrian facility inventory. Collection of Network Data

o MPO staff will monitor roadway improvements and work with NCDOT staff to update our travel demand model on a regular basis.

Capacity Deficiency Analysis o MPO staff will identify areas of deficient capacity through use of travel demand

model and field observations for further analysis as potential long range transportation improvement projects.

II-A-2 Travelers and Behavior

Dwelling Unit, Population, & Employment Changes o MPO staff will review development plans and continuously compare such against

socioeconomic forecasts used by our regional Travel Demand Model.

Draft


Collection of Base Year Data o MPO staff will maintain a geodatabase with all relevant information for

population, housing and employment. Travel Surveys

o MPO Staff will review travel surveys when available. Vehicle Occupancy Rates (Counts)

o MPO Staff will review when available. Travel Time Studies

o MPO Staff will assist with travel time studies as deemed necessary.

II-A-3 Transportation Modeling

Travel Model Updates o MPO staff will work with the NCDOT to update our regional Travel Demand

Model as necessary. Forecast of Data to Horizon Year

o MPO Staff will review data to ensure accuracy. Forecast of Future Year Travel Patterns

o MPO staff will work with the NCDOT to test alternative roadway network improvements for system benefit.

Financial Planning o MPO staff will work with the NCDOT to develop realistic transportation revenue

and cost estimates for various transportation planning initiatives.

II-B Planning Process II-B-1 Targeted Planning

Hazard Mitigation and Disaster Planning o MPO Staff will work with other agencies to ensure resiliency of future projects.

Congestion Management Strategies o MPO staff will develop strategies for managing congestion by increasing

transportation system capacity or reducing demand. Freight Movement/Mobility Planning

o MPO staff will identify freight movement deficiencies and work with the TAC to identify priorities and improvements for effectively accommodating demand.

II-B-2 Regional Planning

Community Goals and Objectives o MPO staff will monitor public input as it pertains to goals and objectives set forth

in the Long Range Transportation Plan. Highway Element of the CTP/MTP

Draft


o MPO staff will identify highway deficiencies and work with the TAC to identify priorities and improvements for effectively accommodating demand.

Transit Element of the CTP/MTP o MPO staff will identify public transportation deficiencies and work with the

Jacksonville City Council and TAC to identify solutions for improving system’s ability to meet demand.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Element of the CTP/MTP o MPO staff will identify bicycle and pedestrian facility deficiencies and work with

the TAC to identify priorities and improvements for effectively accommodating demand.

Airport/Air Travel Element of the CTP/MTP o MPO staff will identify airport and air service deficiencies and work with Ellis

Airport Staff and the TAC to identify priorities and improvements for effectively accommodating demand.

Collector Street Element of the CTP/MTP o MPO staff will identify collector street deficiencies and work with the TAC to

identify priorities and improvements for effectively accommodating demand. Rail, Waterway, or Other Mode of the CTP/MTP

o MPO Staff will assist in the completion of the Rail Study.

II-B-3 Special Studies

Special Studies

With the assistance of private consulting firms, MPO staff will conduct special studies to address current transportation system challenges. Two specific program elements are included in this task:

On-call Professional Services ($20,000): Professional consulting firms will be hired to conduct operational studies or collect data that cannot be carried out by MPO staff or through other in-house resources.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan ($70,000): A professional consulting will be hired to update the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the MPO. With the completion of Regional Plans in the surrounding areas, this plan will tie together those plans as well as update the recommendations of the 2009 plan.

III-A Unified Planning Work Program III-A-1 Unified Planning Work Program

Development of Unified Planning Work Program and Five-Year Plan o MPO staff will continuously evaluate the Fiscal Year 2017 UPWP and submit

changes as necessary to NCDOT. Staff will monitor all tasks identified in the plan and submit timely invoices to NCDOT. Staff will develop the FY 2018 UPWP.

Draft


III-A-2 Metrics and Performance Measures

Metrics and Performance Measures o MPO Staff will work with NCDOT and FHWA to ensure performance measures are

established and reporting is accomplished.

III-B Transportation Improvement Program III-B-1 Prioritization

Project development, selection and submission through the STI process will be completed.

III-B-2 Metropolitan TIP (TIP)

MPO staff will maintain the FY 2016-2025 MTIP and coordinate with NCDOT to develop the FY 2018-2027 MTIP/STIP.

III-B-3 Merger and Project Development

Merger Process o MPO Staff will participate as needed in the merger process during project

development and permitting of TIP projects. Feasibility Studies

o MPO Staff will participate in any feasibility studies identified for the MPA.

III-C Civil Rights Compliance and Other Regulatory Requirements III-C-1 Title VI

MPO staff will ensure compliance with the requirements of Title VI in urban area policies and practices.

III-C-2 Environmental Justice

MPO staff will ensure that transportation plans and projects comply with Environmental Justice policies.

III-C-3 Minority Business Enterprise

Draft


MPO staff will encourage participation of minority-owned business enterprises in contractual and supply opportunities.

III-C-4 Planning for the Elderly and Disabled

MPO staff will ensure the special needs of the elderly and disabled are addressed in all transportation planning projects. Staff will also identify areas with potential concentrations of elderly and disabled for further analysis and inclusion in planning projects.

II-C-5 Safety/Drug Control Planning

MPO staff will ensure that transportation plans and projects comply with Environmental Justice policies.

III-C-6 Public Participation

MPO staff will update the adopted Public Participation Plan as required by federal statutes and based upon local need. Staff will also conduct public participation activities in accordance with the Plan as needed for ongoing projects.

III-C-7 Private Sector Participation

MPO staff will encourage private sector participation in planning and project activities throughout the year.

III-D Statewide and Extra-Regional Planning

Statewide and Regional Planning o MPO staff will continue to coordinate urban area activities with federal, statewide

and regional initiatives. Staff will continue to participate in activities of adjacent MPOs and RPOs. We will also coordinate with local governments in the region as well as other identified transportation stakeholders. Staff will participate in related workshops, conferences and meetings, as needed and/or required.

Statewide and Federal Policy Development and Implementation o MPO Staff will work with partner agencies as necessary.

Draft


III-E Management, Operations, and Program Support Administration

Board Support o MPO staff will conduct required administrative and operational tasks to support

our organization. Staff will also periodically review and update administrative agreements and procedures. MPO staff will perform daily operations to disseminate planning information to the TAC/TCC members, the public and/or other agencies.

Subcommittee Support o MPO Staff will provide support to any subcommittees designated by the TAC or

TCC. Workgroup Support

o MPO Staff will provide support to any workgroups designated by the TAC or TCC. Members Services

o MPO Staff will provide support as needed. Administration

o MPO Staff will conduct administrative tasks as necessary.

Draft


SECTION 5303 WORK TASK NARRATIVE

MPO Jacksonville

FTA Code 44.24.00 Short Range Transportation Planning

Task Code II-A Network & Support Systems

Title of Planning Task Transit System Data

Task Objective Jacksonville MPO staff will support the operations of Jacksonville Transit through the completion of regional planning activities. This work will include updates to short- and long-range plans as needed, mapping, data collection, web page management, public outreach, other planning-related activities.

Tangible Product Expected Jacksonville Transit web page, route schedules, outreach materials, maps, socieoeconomic data, long- and short-range plan updates, etc.

Expected Completion Date of Products

June 30, 2017

Previous Work 2013 Coordinated Human Services Transit Plan, 2040 Jacksonville MPO Long-Range Transportation Plan, 2011 Transit System Development Plan

Previous FTA Funds $27,840

Relationship This is an effort of the City of Jacksonville

Responsible Agency Jacksonville MPO

Section 104 (f) PL, Local 20% -

Section 104 (f) PL, FHWA 80% -

Section 5303 Local 10% $3,500

Section 5303 NCDOT 10% $3,500

Section 5303 FTA 80% $28,000

Draft


SECTION 5307 WORK TASK NARRATIVE

MPO Jacksonville

FTA Code 44.24.00 Short Range Transportation Planning

Task Code II-A Networks & Support Systems

Title of Planning Task Transit System Data

Task Objective Jacksonville MPO staff will support the operations of Jacksonville Transit through the completion of local and regional planning activities. This work will include data collection, public outreach, other planning-related activities.

Tangible Product Expected Route restructuring and amenities plan, passenger surveys, inventories of bus stop amenities

Expected Completion Date of Products

June 30, 2017

Previous Work

Previous FTA Funds $0

Relationship This is an effort of the City of Jacksonville

Responsible Agency City of Jacksonville

Section 104 (f) PL, Local 20% -

Section 104 (f) PL, FHWA 80% -

Section 5303 Local 10% -

Section 5303 NCDOT 10% -

Section 5303 FTA 80% -

Section 5307 Transit - Local 10% $4,500

Section 5307 Transit - NCDOT 10% $4,500

Section 5307 Transit - FTA 80% $36,000

Draft


DBE CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES

Jacksonville Urban Area MPO Anthony Prinz (910) 938-5292

Prospectus Task Code

Prospectus Description

Name of Contracting

Agency

Type of Contracting Opportunity

(consultant, etc.)

Federal Funds to be

Contracted

Total Funds to be

Contracted


City of Jacksonville

Consultant – On-call professional services $16,000 $20,000


City of Jacksonville

Consultant – Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan $56,000 $70,000

Draft

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FOR THE JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA

A motion was made by TAC Member ___________________________________ and seconded by TAC Member _____________________________________ for the adoption of the following resolution, and upon being put to a vote was duly adopted. WHEREAS, a comprehensive, coordinated and continuing transportation planning work program must be carried out cooperatively in order to ensure that funds for transportation projects are effectively allocated to the Jacksonville urban area; and WHEREAS, the Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization has been designated as the recipient of Federal Transit Administration Metropolitan Planning Program funds; and WHEREAS, members of the Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee agree that the Unified Planning Work Program will effectively advance transportation planning for Fiscal Year 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Transportation Advisory Committee hereby approved the Fiscal Year 2017 Unified Planning Work Program for the Jacksonville urban area. I, Michael Lazzara, Chairman of the Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the minutes of a meeting of the Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, duly held on this, the 10th day of March, 2016.

________________________________________________ Chairman, Transportation Advisory Committee Subscribed and sworn to me this ___day of _________2016. ______________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires _________________________.

Draft

Jacksonville MPO815 New Bridge Street

PO Box 128Jacksonville, NC 28541-0128

[email protected]


North Carolina


North Carolina

Draft


Action Required

To: Technical Coordinating Committee From: Peggy Holland, Senior Transportation Planner Subject: Draft FY 2016 – 2025 TIP Amendment 2

2/11/2016

The FY 2016-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) was adopted by the TAC in April 2015 and amended in October 2015 to align with the adopted State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Additional state funding availability has resulted in the addition and acceleration of projects. U-5739, US 17 Superstreet was accelerated, into fully funded status. U-5878, Commerce Dr. extension, was added as a fully funded project. U-5319, Gum Branch Dr./Western Blvd. intersection improvement, was modified to add improvements to all 4 legs of the intersection. The Jacksonville Multimodal Center is now a funded project. Additionally, Henderson Dr. widening, Henderson Dr. extension, and NC 111 widening were added to the Developmental Program. Recommended Action: Recommend adoption of the draft FY 2016 – 2025 TIP

Amendment 2 Attachment: Draft FY 2016 – 2025 TIP Amendment 2

FY 2016-2025

Transportation Improvement Program

Adopted: April 2015

Amendment 1: August 2015

Amendment 2: March 2016

1 | P a g e

The Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Organization (JUMPO) has cooperatively developed this Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Jacksonville Transit, Onslow United Transit System (OUTS), and the Albert J. Ellis Airport as required by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA). JUMPO was undertaking the development of its most recent Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) during the process of developing the TIP. All projects included in the TIP are detailed in the 2040 LRTP, which was adopted in April 2015. Additional information on individual projects can be seen online at www.jumpo-nc.org. The North Carolina General Assembly passed Strategic Transportation Investment legislation in 2014 mandating how projects would be selected for the TIP. All projects were input into the SPOT Online system in early 2014. Based on scores and funding availability, a list of Statewide Mobility projects was released in spring 2014. All projects in all categories had quantitative scores assigned based on modal criteria and were released in early summer. A public comment period provided opportunities for members of the public to comment on projects and provide feedback to the Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) and Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) on how local input points should be assigned. The TAC assigned their local points at their August 2014 meeting. The draft list of projects to be funded was released by NCDOT in December 2014. This document reflects transportation investment priorities and programs transportation projects for potential funding over the ten-year period of FY 2016-2025. Projects programmed in the first four years of the document (FY 2016-2019) depict the funding committed in the Transportation Improvement Program. Projects programmed in the remaining years (FY 2020-2025) are illustrative. All highway projects in the TIP, including all phases, are the responsibility of NCDOT. Preliminary Engineering for all projects (except Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects) is accounted for under a Statewide Line Item which also includes environmental analysis. Local match for all projects is provided by NCDOT unless otherwise stated. Costs listed in the document are total costs except for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) which show the local match separately. Most federal sources require a 20% local match, although some federal funding types either require no match or only 10%. The Public Transportation section documents the expenditures of the Sections 5307 and 5303 grants. The MPO public participation process for the development of the TIP meets the requirements for the FTA Programming of Projects. The final section of the document lists Statewide Projects. These projects are those that are programmed for work throughout the state and may be applicable in the Jacksonville area.

http://www.jumpo-nc.org/

2 | P a g e

Financial Plan The Financial Plan includes all projects in the committed State Transportation Improvement Program (2016-2019) portion of the document. Information concerning the Developmental Program (2020-2025) projects is included for illustrative purposes. All expenditures are expressed in current year dollars as is listed in the document tables. However, it is anticipated that costs will rise over the life of the document by approximately 2% per year. Revenue is anticipated to be stable through the life of the document. Adjustments are made by NCDOT on an annual basis to ensure anticipated costs are reflective of the most current assessments. Funding from the following federal programs is included: HP – Federal-Aid High Priority HRRR – High Risk Rural Roads HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program NHP - National Highway Performance Program NHPB - National Highway Performance Program (Bridge) STP - Surface Transportation Program STPOFF - Surface Transportation Program (Off System Bridge) TAP - Transportation Alternatives Program FMPL – Metropolitan Planning (Transit) FUZ - Urbanized Area Formula Grant

Highway Highway projects fall within many categories, including roadway widening, new roadway, roadway modernization, access management, intersection improvements, interchange upgrade, and bridge replacement. It is anticipated that revenue from all sources, both federal and state, will be available at the necessary levels for completion of programmed projects.

Highway Expenditures FY 2016-2019 ($thousands) Funding Source Total Amount

HRRR $176 HSIP $5,842 NHP $11,357 STP $12,296 State Highway Trust Funds $3,779 State Match $6,582 Total $40,032

Table Updated January 2016

Highway* Expenditures FY 2020-2025 ($thousands)

Funding Source Total Amount NHP $109,552 NHPB $5,378 STPOFF $847 TAP $408 HFB $1,120 State Highway Trust Funds $141,652 State Match $29,224 Local (Jacksonville) $122

Total $288,303 *Includes Aviation; Bike/Ped Table Updated January 2016 Public Transportation The primary funding source for public transportation is through the Urbanized Area Formula Grant (Section 5307) fund. The local match for capital projects is 20%. The local match for operating expenses is 50%. While the state can provide matching funds, these are awarded on a competitive basis and are therefore not assumed to be available. All revenue/expenditures for public transportation are based on year of expenditure, computed at 2% annually.

Transit Capital/Construction Expenditures FY 2016-2019 ($thousands)

FUZ Local Match

Total State Local

$6,494 $810 $2,057 $9,361 Table Updated January 2016 The state provides assistance with planning and operating expenses.

Transit Planning Expenditures FY 2016-2019 ($thousands)

Local Match

Total State Local

FUZ $259 $32 $32 $323 FMPL $138 $17 $17 $172

Transit Operating Expenditures FY 2016-2019 ($thousands)

FUZ Local Match

Total SMAP Local

$1,846 $518 $1,328 $3,692 Anticipated public transportation revenue includes

Anticipated Revenue FY 2016-2019 ($thousands) FUZ FMPL State SMAP Local Total

$8,599 $138 $859 $518 $3,434 $13,548 Table Updated January 2016

COUNTY

FUTURE YEARS

F

NHPB - National Highway Performance Program (Bridge)NHPIM - National Highway Performance Program (Interstate Maintenance)O - OthersRR - Rail-Highway SafetyS (M) - State MatchSRTS - Safe Routes to School

FLPI - Federal Lands Program (Indian Reservation Roads) STP - Surface Transportation ProgramHFB - Highway Fund Bridge Replacement Program STPDA - Surface Transportation Program - Direct AttributableHP - Federal-Aid High Priority STPEB - Surface Transportation Program, Enhancements (Bike)

STPON - Surface Transportation Program Bridge (On System Bridge)STPOFF -Surface Transportation Program (Off System Bridge) PE - Preliminary EngineeringT - State Highway Trust Funds

NHP - National Highway Performance Program TAP - Transportation Alternatives Program RG - Right of Way (GARVEE)

SW - StatewideTRN -Transition Project

S - StructureU - Utilities

I - ImplementationL - LandscapingM - MitigationO - OperationsP - Paving

WAKE

NUMBERLENGTH (MILES)

JUMPO

R-0000

IDROUTE/CITY

US or NC RoutesON NEW LOCATION. I - InterstateWITH A BYPASS OF HOMETOWN ROUTE/CITY

Project termini and a general

SW

M1500

A

NHP

4000

FUNDING CATEGORY (1)

used for each project phase.

FUNDING SOURCE (2)

U

B3000R

FY 2017

C

(3) WORK TYPE (ACTIVITY)

A - Acquisition

with proposed work type or activity beginning in the initial scheduled year. (Estimates are in thousand of

For other work types or activities see Work Type (Activity) box below.

dollars.)

of a project segment indicates (Cash-Flow Funding) COMMITMENTSFUTURE

SW CBSW

One or two letter

HIGHWAY PROGRAM

UNFUNDED

NC 3 TO SR 1003SR 1003 TO NC 96

ASW

UNFUNDED

20000CRC 5000C 5000 BC B

WIDEN TO A FOUR-LANE FACILITY

A

NC 00 R7.3 R25063,450I-40 TO NC 96 EAST OF HOMETOWN.

B

FY 2025 FY 2018

700

FY 2019

DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAMSTATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FY 2020FY 2015 FY 2016

M

TOTAL PROJECT

COST (THOU)

NHPNHP

FUN

DS

A

PRIOR YEARS COST

(THOU)

TYPE OF WORK / ESTIMATED COST IN THOUSANDS / PROJECT BREAKS

U 5000NHP

C10000

FY 2021

C

FY 2023 FY 2024

FY 2022

5000

9000

APD - Appalachian Development

NHPNHP

LOCATION / DESCRIPTION NHP

NHP

I-40 TO NC 3

Preliminary engineering, Right of Way, Mitigation, Utilities or Construction. break.

work description.

way, utility, mitigation and construction cost estimates

See Highway Funding Key

any project breaks.Category for the project andIdentifies the "STI" Funding

by funding category in current dollars. Cost may include one or more funding types. Multi-year funding

for an explanation of funding categories

Phases of implementation: ESTIMATED COST Preliminary engineering, right of

(1) FUNDING CATEGORY

PROJECT BREAKS

designation for project

LOCATION / DESCRIPTION

SR - Secondary Road

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER Assigned to each project at conception and remains with

BVarious - multiple routesNEW ROUTE or City

WORK TYPE (ACTIVITY) (3)

BOND (R) - Revenue Bond

HRRR - High Risk Rural Roads

L - LocalHSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program

project until completion.

DIV - DivisionEX - Exempt

REG - RegionalHF - State Dollars (Non-STI)

F - Feasibility StudyCG - Construction (GARVEE)C - Construction

G - Grading and Structures

R - Right of Way

(2) FUNDING KEY FOR HIGHWAY FUNDING SOURCES

ER - Emergency Relief Funds

CMAQ - Congestion MitigationDP - Discretionary or Demonstration

FED - Federal Rail Funds

3

COUNTY ID

FUTURE YEARS

F

RR - Rail-Highway SafetyRTAP - Rural Transit Assistance ProgramS - State I - ImpementationS (M) - State Match O - OperationsSMAP - Operating Assistance and State Maintenance Oc - OPS Funded CapitalSRTS - Safe Routes to School PE - Preliminary EngineeringSTAT - State PL - Planning / DesignSTHSR - Stimulus High Speed Rail R - Right-of-WaySTPDA - Surface Transportation Program - Direct AttributableSTPE - Surface Transportation Program, EnhancementsSTPEB - Surface Transportation Program, Enhancements (Bike)T - State Highway Trust FundsT2001 - State Rail FundsTAP - Transportation Alternatives ProgramTIGER DISC - TIGER Discretionary Grants

HP - Federal-Aid High PriorityJARC - Job Assistance and Reverse Commute (3037)

(1) FUNDING CATEGORY

DURHAM AREA

SR - Secondary Road

TRANSIT PARTNERROUTE / CITY /

NUMBER

TA-4738


PASSENGER AMENITIES - BUS STOP TRANSIT AUTHORITY

DIV

SHELTERS, BENCHES, SHOP EQUIPMENTSPARE PARTS, ENGINES, SERVICE VEHICLES, ETC.

CP

BUS STOP SHELTER AND BENCHES LOCATED AT HOLLOWAY STREET

ESTIMATED COST Preliminary engineering, right of

C10000

dollars.)

of a project segment indicates (Cash-Flow Funding)Mitigation, Utilities or Construction.

way, utility, mitigation and construction cost estimates

(2) FUNDING SOURCES KEY

O - OtherL - Local

initial scheduled year. (Estimates are in thousand of

For other work types or activities see Work Type (Activity) box below.

work description. CP

Project termini and a general

conception and remains with

9000

PROJECT BREAKS

CP

Various - multiple routes

A

5000

FY 2022

C

CP 3000CP

BCP 5000 B

TYPE OF WORK / ESTIMATED COST IN THOUSANDS / PROJECT BREAKS

FY 2023 FY 2024FY 2021

STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FY 2020

TOTAL PROJECT

COST (THOU)

FUZFUZ

FUN

DS

A

PRIOR YEARS COST

(THOU)

ACP 700

FY 2015 FY 2016

4000CP

FY 2025

5000

BB

CP CP 5000B

UNFUNDED

NON HIGHWAY PROGRAM

ADIV

FY 2017 FY 2018

BSHOP EQUIPMENT, SPARE PARTS, ENGINES, SERVICE VEHICLES, ETC.

WORK TYPE (ACTIVITY) (3)Phases of implementation:

DIV C

20000

COMMITMENTSFUTURE

by funding category in current dollars. Cost may include one or more funding types. Multi-year funding

Preliminary engineering, Right of Way, UNFUNDED

BUS STOP SHELTER AND BENCHES LOCATED AT GREGSON AVENUE

with proposed work type or activity beginning in the

break.

One or two letter

CP

A

for an explanation of funding categories

FUNDING CATEGORY (1)

DIV

JUMPO

DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM

DURHAM

FY 2019

TRANSIT PARTNERROUTE / CITY /

NEW ROUTE or CityTRANSIT PARTNER

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER Assigned to each project at

US or NC RoutesI - Interstate

project until completion.

C - City

FEPD - Elderly and Persons with Disablity (5310)

FMOD - Fixed Guideway Modifications

designation for project

any project breaks.Category for the project and


used for each project phase.

FUNDING SOURCE (2)

Identifies the "STI" Funding

See Highway Funding Key

FSPR - State Planning and Research

FNF - New Freedom ProgramFNS - New Starts - Capital (5309)

FMPL - Metropolitan Planning (5303)

FED - Federal Rail Funds

FLAP - Federal Lands Access Program

FUZ - Urbanized Area Formula Program (5307)

CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation

FF - Federal Ferry

FNU - Non Urbanized Area Formula Program (5311)

(3) WORK TYPE (ACTIVITY)

C - ConstructionAD - Administrative

CP - Capital

A - AcquisitionHF - State Dollars (Non-STI)REG - RegionalSW - Statewide

DIV - Division

DP - Discretionary or DemonstrationFBUS - Capital Program - Bus Earmark (5309)

4


ROUTE/CITYCOUNTYID

LOCATION / DESCRIPTION (THOU) (THOU)NUMBER

PRIORYEARSCOST

TOTALPROJCOST

LENGTH

TYPE OF W ORK / ESTIMATED COST IN THOUSANDS / PROJECT BREAKS

FUNDS FY 2016

UNFUNDED

FUTURE YEARSFY 2017 FY 2019FY 2018 FY 2020

STATE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM

FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025

HIGHWAY PROGRAM

RURAL PROJECTS

R-5023 5087 3187SR 1135 (MORNINGSIDE ROAD) TO W EST OF SR 1109 (HOLLY SHELTER ROAD). W IDEN TO THREE LANES.

4.2 STP C 1140 B STP C 760 C

ONSLOW NC 53

(BURGAW HIGHW AY)

A SR 1135 (MORNINGSIDE ROAD) TO SR 1116 (ONSLOW PINES ROAD) - COMPLETETRN

B SR 1116 (ONSLOW PINES ROAD) TO SR 1105 (HAW S RUN ROAD) - RIGHT OF W AY IN PROGRESSTRN

C SR 1105 (HAW S RUN ROAD) TO W EST OF SR 1109 (HOLLY SHELTER ROAD) - RIGHT OF W AY IN PROGRESSTRN

URBAN PROJECTS

U-5735 25824SR 1130 (OLD MAPLEHURST ROAD) IN JACKSONVILLE. CONSTRUCT INTERCHANGE AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS TO MCAS NEW RIVER MAIN GATE.

REG

NHP R 4620 NHP C 21204

ONSLOW US 17

(W ILMINGTON HIGHW AY)

U-4007 196770 85354

PLANNING/DESIGN IN PROGRESS

US 17 BUSINESS (JACKSONVILLE BYPASS) TO SR 1326 (DRUMMER KELLUM ROAD) IN JACKSONVILLE. ADD ADDITIONAL LANES AND CONSTRUCT ROUTES ON NEW LOCATION.

1.4 NHP 34775R C NHP 26300C C NHP 32345R D NHP 16600C D NHP R 270 E NHP C 1126 E

ONSLOW US 17

A SR 1308 (BELL FORK ROAD) TO EAST OF SR 1470 (W ESTERN BOULEVARD) - COMPLETE

B COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TO SR 1470 (W ESTERN BOULEVARD) - COMPLETE

C W ESTERN BOULEVARD TO FAIRW AY DRIVE

D US 17, FAIRW AY DRIVE TO DRUMMER KELLUM ROAD

E US 17 AT NC 53 (W ESTERN BOULEVARD) AND SR 1406 (PINEY GREEN ROAD). UPGRADE INTERSECTIONS.SW

U-2107 1080 1080

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

US 17 SOUTH TO US 17 NORTH. LANDSCAPING.

ONSLOW US 17

(JACKSONVILLE

BYPASS)

E LANDSCAPINGTRN

U-5728 465SR 1308 (BELL FORK ROAD) IN JACKSONVILLE. IMPROVE INTERSECTION.

REG

NHP R 90 NHP C 375

ONSLOW US 17 BUSINESS

(MARINE BOULEVARD)

U-5719 2235 375SR 1219 (BLUE CREEK ROAD)/SR 1396 (RIDGE ROAD). REALIGN INTERSECTIONS TO FORM ONE AT-GRADE INTERSECTION.

0.5

SW

NHP R 360 NHP C 1500

ONSLOW US 258

(RICHLANDS

HIGHW AY)

Page 1 of 7 COST AND SCHEDULES ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE AS MORE INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE

Monday, January 11, 2016

DIV - Division Category EX - Exempt CategoryHF - State Dollars (Non STI) REG - Regional Category SW - Statewide Category TRN - Transition Project


ROUTE/CITYCOUNTYID


PRIORYEARSCOST

TOTALPROJCOST

LENGTH


FUNDS FY 2016

UNFUNDED



FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025

HIGHWAY PROGRAM

URBAN PROJECTS

U-5739 14614SR 1212 (PONY FARM ROAD) TO NC 53 (BURGAW HIGHW AY). CONSTRUCT SUPERSTREET.

2.2

REG

NHP R 1750 NHP U 210 NHP C 4218 4218C4218C

ONSLOW US 258

(RICHLANDS

HIGHW AY)

U-5508 3370 300


NC 53 (W ESTERN BOULEVARD) IN JACKSONVILLE. UPGRADE INTERSECTION AND DRAINAGE.

0.5

SW

STP R 420 STP C 2650

ONSLOW NC 24

(LEJEUNE BOULEVARD)

U-5716 38066 650US 258 (RICHLANDS HIGHW AY) INTERSECTION. CONVERT AT-GRADE INTERSECTION TO INTERCHANGE.

2.0

SW

NHP R 2190 NHP 11742C11742C11742C

ONSLOW NC 24

U-5741 54029NC 24 BUSINESS (JOHNSON BOULEVARD) TO JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA BOUNDARY. CONSTRUCT ACCESS MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS.

5.2

REG

NHP R 14040 NHP U 1685 NHP 38304C

ONSLOW NC 24

(LEJEUNE BOULEVARD)

U-5736 15532US 17 (MARINE BOULEVARD) TO NC 24 (LEJUENE BOULEVARD) IN JACKSONVILLE. CONSTRUCT ACCESS MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS.

2.6

REG

NHP R 2000 NHP U 80 NHP 13452C

ONSLOW NC 53

(W ESTERN BOULEVARD)

U-5789 698SR 2714 (JACKSONVILLE PARKW AY). IMPROVE INTERSECTION.

DIV

T R 135 T C 563

ONSLOW NC 53


U-5877 930SR 1308 (GUM BRANCH ROAD). IMPROVEINTERSECTION.

0.5

DIV

ONSLOW NC 53


U-5915 19770US 258 (RICHLANDS HIGHW AY) TO SR 1221 (FOW LER MANNING ROAD). W IDEN TO MULTI-LANES.

5.4

DIV

T 523U T 4354R T 9929C C 4964

ONSLOW NC 111

(CATHERINE LAKE ROAD)




pholland

Line

pholland

Line

pholland

Line

pholland

Line


ROUTE/CITYCOUNTYID


PRIORYEARSCOST

TOTALPROJCOST

LENGTH


FUNDS FY 2016

UNFUNDED



FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025

HIGHWAY PROGRAM

URBAN PROJECTS

U-5733 30204US 258 (RICHLANDS HIGHW AY) TO SR 1308 (GUM BRANCH ROAD). CONSTRUCT EXTENSION OF NC 111 ON NEW LOCATION.

3.5

REG

T 1084R T 130U T C 28990

ONSLOW NC 111

(CATHERINE LAKE ROAD)

U-5319 930

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

SR 1470 (W ESTERN BOULEVARD) IN JACKSONVILLE. INSTALL DUAL LEFT TURN MOVEMENT FOR SOUTHBOUND SR 1308.

TRN

STP R 180 STP C 750

ONSLOW SR 1308

(GUM BRANCH ROAD)

U-4906 11208 808


EAST CITY LIMITS OF RICHLANDS TO SR 1322 (SUMMERSILL SCHOOL ROAD) IN JACKSONVILLE. W IDEN TO THREE LANES.

7.5

TRN

STP R 1000 STP C 9400

ONSLOW SR 1308

(GUM BRANCH ROAD)

U-5793 53016SR 1322 (SUMMERSILL SCHOOL ROAD) TO JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA BOUNDARY.W IDEN EXISTING ROADW AY.

6.2

DIV

T 20668R T 2480U T 14934C C 14934

ONSLOW SR 1308

(GUM BRANCH ROAD)

U-5913 14969NC 53 (W ESTERN BOULEVARD) TO US 17 BYPASS EXTENSION (JACKSONVILLE PARKW AY). EXTEND ROUTE ON NEW LOCATION.

0.4

DIV

T 150U T 1253R T C 13566

ONSLOW SR 1336

(HENDERSON DRIVE)

U-5903 10344SR 1308 (GUM BRANCH ROAD) TO NC 53(W ESTERN BOULEVARD). W IDEN TO MULTI-LANES.

1.1

DIV

T 253U T 2111R T 2660C C 2660 C 2660

ONSLOW SR 1336

(HENDERSON DRIVE)

U-3810 112841 112841

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

US 17 TO NC 24 IN JACKSONVILLE. W IDEN TO MULTI-LANES, PART ON NEW LOCATION.

6.6ONSLOW SR 1406

(PINEY GREEN ROAD)

U-5791 79907NC 53 (W ESTERN BOULEVARD) TO US 17 (NEW BERN HIGHW AY). W IDEN TO MULTI-LANES, PART ON NEW LOCATION.

3.8

DIV

T 10987R T 1318U T 45068C C 22534

ONSLOW SR 2714

(JACKSONVILLE PARKWAY

EXTENSION)





ROUTE/CITYCOUNTYID


PRIORYEARSCOST

TOTALPROJCOST

LENGTH


FUNDS FY 2016

UNFUNDED



FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025

HIGHWAY PROGRAM

URBAN PROJECTS

U-5787 3357NC 53 (W ESTERN BOULEVARD) TO MCDANIEL DRIVE IN JACKSONVILLE. CONSTRUCT ROADW AY ON NEW LOCATION.

0.3

DIV

T R 1648 T U 198 T C 1511

ONSLOW SR 2715

(TRADE STREET)

U-5878 3772COMMERCE DRIVE TO SR 1406 (PINEYGREEN ROAD). CONSTRUCT ROADW AY ON NEW LOCATION.

0.2

DIV

T U 32 T R 266 T 3474C

ONSLOW COMMERCE DRIVE

U-5168 7644 7644

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

COMPUTERIZED SIGNAL SYSTEM.ONSLOW JACKSONVILLE

FEASIBILITY STUDIES

FS-1103A

FEASIBILITY STUDY IN PROGRESS

SR 1308 (BELL FORK ROAD) TO SR 1406 (PINEY GREEN ROAD). CONSTRUCT MEDIAN, ACCESS MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS, ITS, AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS.

6.6ONSLOW NC 24

FS-1003A

FEASIBILITY STUDY IN PROGRESS

US 17 TO NC 24. CONSTRUCT MEDIAN, ACCESS MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS, AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS.

2.5ONSLOW NC 53


FEDERAL BRIDGE PROJECTS

B-5652 1400REPLACE BRIDGE 660033 OVER W OLF SW AMP.

HF

HFB 125R HFB C 1275

ONSLOW US 17 NORTHBOUND LANE

B-5650 6722REPLACE BRIDGE 660007 OVER NORTHEAST CREEK.

SW

NHPB 320R NHPB 3201C C 3201

ONSLOW NC 24 W ESTBOUND LANE

B-5636 1059REPLACE BRIDGE 660071 OVER HARRIS CREEK.

DIV

STPOFF R 50 STPOFF C 1009

ONSLOW SR 1109

(HARRIS CREEK

ROAD)





ROUTE/CITYCOUNTYID


PRIORYEARSCOST

TOTALPROJCOST

LENGTH


FUNDS FY 2016

UNFUNDED



FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025

HIGHWAY PROGRAM

FEDERAL BRIDGE PROJECTS

BD-5103 16152 16152

UNDER CONSTRUCTION - BRIDGE PURCHASE ORDER CONTRACT (BPOC)

DIVISION 3 PURCHASE ORDER CONTRACT BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS.

DIV

BRUNSW ICK

DUPLIN

NEW HANOVER

ONSLOW

PENDER

SAMPSON

VARIOUS

MITIGATION PROJECTS

EE-4903 3365 3365

IN PROGRESS

ECOSYSTEMS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVISION 3 PROJECT MITIGATION.

BRUNSW ICK

DUPLIN

NEW HANOVER

ONSLOW

PENDER

SAMPSON

VARIOUS

HIGHWAY SAFETY PROJECTS

SF-4903F 243 48SR 1109 (HOLLY SHELTER ROAD). REALIGNMENT AND LANE CONSTRUCTION.

TRN

HRRR C 195 ONSLOW NC 53

W -5602 3525 315CAMP LEJEUNE GATE TO NC 210. CONVERT TW O LANE ROADW AY TO THREE LANE ROADW AY W ITH A TW O W AY LEFT TURN LANE.

REG

HSIP R 10 HSIP C 3200

ONSLOW NC 172

W -5203 23379 11987

DIVISION PURCHASE ORDER CONTRACT (DPOC) - IN PROGRESS

DIVISION 3 RUMBLE STRIPS, GUARDRAIL, SAFETY AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS.

HSIP R 36 DIV HSIP C 3575 DIV HSIP R 25 RE HSIP C 1255 RE HSIP R 51 SW HSIP C 5725 SW C 725 SW

BRUNSW ICK

DUPLIN

NEW HANOVER

ONSLOW

PENDER

SAMPSON

VARIOUS

DIV DIVISION 3 RUMBLE STRIPS, GUARDRAIL, SAFETY AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS.DIV

REGDIVISION 3 RUMBLE STRIPS, GUARDRAIL, SAFETY AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS.REG

SW DIVISION 3 RUMBLE STRIPS, GUARDRAIL, SAFETY AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS.SW




ROUTE/CITYCOUNTYID


PRIORYEARSCOST

TOTALPROJCOST

LENGTH


FUNDS FY 2016

UNFUNDED



FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025

NON HIGHWAY PROGRAM

AVIATION PROJECTS

AV-5733 750DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT RUNW AY 23 HOLDING APRON.

REG

T C 300 O C 450

ONSLOW ALBERT J. ELLIS

AIRPORT (OAJ)

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS

EB-5736 530US 17 (MARINE BOULEVARD) TO SR 1336 (HENDERSON DRIVE), CONSTRUCT SIDEW ALK ON BOTH SIDES.

1.6

DIV

TAP 32PE L 8PE L R 20 TAP C 376L C 94

ONSLOW SR 1308

(GUM BRANCH ROAD)

EB-4705 1550 1550

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

LEJEUNE BOULEVARD GREENW AY, SOUTH SIDE OF NC 24 (LEJEUNE BOULEVARD), MONTFORD POINT ROAD TO U-5132 GREENW AY TERMINI.

1.5

TRN

ONSLOW JACKSONVILLE

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

TA-4943 2571 1344EXPANSION BUS

HF

FUZ CP 90 CP 91 CP 94 CP 95 CP 97 103CP101CP99CP CP 105 CP 107L CP 22 CP 23 CP 23 CP 24 CP 24 26CP25CP25CP CP 26 CP 27

ONSLOW JACKSONVILLE TRANSIT

TA-4944 4854 1636REPLACEMENT BUS

HF

FUZ CP 179 CP 183 CP 186 CP 190 CP 291 310CP303CP297CP CP 315 CP 322L CP 22 CP 23 CP 23 CP 24 CP 36 39CP38CP37CP CP 39 CP 40S CP 22 CP 23 CP 23 CP 24 CP 36 39CP38CP37CP CP 39 CP 40


TD-4905 928 928FACILITY - PARK & RIDE

HF

FUZ ONSLOW JACKSONVILLE TRANSIT

TD-4904 8758 2634FACILITY - TRANSIT CENTER - DOW NTOW N

DIV

FUZ C 3849 L C 1520 T C 755


TG-5220 268 95JACKSONVILLE TRANSIT - MOBILITY MANAGEMENT

HF

FUZ CP 27 CP 27 CP 28 CP 28 CP 29 L CP 3 CP 3 CP 3 CP 4 CP 4 S CP 3 CP 3 CP 3 CP 4 CP 4



Wednesday, January 13, 2016


ROUTE/CITYCOUNTYID


PRIORYEARSCOST

TOTALPROJCOST

LENGTH


FUNDS FY 2016

UNFUNDED



FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025

NON HIGHWAY PROGRAM

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

TG-5109 2851 574PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE

HF

FUZ FUZ CP 159 CP 164 CP 169 CP 174 CP 179 195CP190CP184CP CP 201 CP 207L CP 40 CP 41 CP 42 CP 43 CP 45 49CP47CP46CP CP 50 CP 52


TG-5225 1046 546ROUTINE CAPITAL-BUS STOP SHELTERS, BENCHES, SHOP EQUIPMENT, SPARE PARTS, ENGINES, SERVICE VEHICLES, ETC.HF


NEW HANOVER JACKSONVILLE TRANSIT

TG-5225C 839 95MOBILITY MANAGEMENT

HF



TO-4923 14078 4266OPERATING ASSISTANCE

HF

FUZ O 448 O 457 O 466 O 475 O 485 515O505O495O O 525 O 535L O 311 O 325 O 339 O 353 O 367 410O396O382O O 424 O 438SMAP O 137 O 132 O 127 O 122 O 118 105O109O113O O 101 O 97


TP-5102 686 195PLANNING ASSISTANCE - 5303

HF

FMPL PL 32 PL 34 PL 35 PL 37 PL 38 43PL42PL40PL PL 45 PL 47L PL 4 PL 4 PL 4 PL 5 PL 5 5PL5PL5PL PL 6 PL 6S PL 4 PL 4 PL 4 PL 5 PL 5 5PL5PL5PL PL 6 PL 6


TP-4908 1061 184PLANNING ASSISTANCE - 5307

HF

FUZ PL 62 PL 64 PL 66 PL 67 PL 70 76PL66PL72PL PL 78 PL 80L PL 8 PL 8 PL 8 PL 8 PL 9 10PL8PL9PL PL 10 PL 10S PL 8 PL 8 PL 8 PL 8 PL 9 10PL8PL9PL PL 10 PL 10


TS-5114 254 75SAFETY & SECURITY - MIN. 1% SET ASIDE

HF

FUZ CP 15 CP 15 CP 16 CP 17 CP 17 20CP19CP18CP CP 21 CP 21ONSLOW JACKSONVILLE TRANSIT

TT-4907 2124 1124TECHNOLOGY - VEHICLE TRACKING, FARE COLLECTION, PASSENGER INFORMATION, DATA COMMUNICATIONS, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRIORITY

HF




Wednesday, January 13, 2016


RESOLUTION AMENDING THE JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN

PLANNING ORGANIZATION FY 2016-2025 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

A motion was made by ___________________ and seconded by ____________________ for adoption of the following resolution, and upon being put to a vote, was duly adopted.

WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration require Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to develop a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) in cooperation with the State and affected public transportation operators within their planning jurisdiction; and

WHEREAS, the Jacksonville Urban Area MPO has developed a TIP to include capital and non-capital surface transportation projects within the Jacksonville urban planning area; and

WHEREAS, the TIP includes a financial plan that demonstrates how it can be implemented within anticipated fiscal constraints; and

WHERAS, modifications to the TIP were necessary due to additional funding availability for projects; and

WHEREAS, the TIP was advertised for public comment in accordance with the adopted Public Participation Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Transportation Advisory Committee hereby amends the FY 2016-2025 Transportation Improvement Program, on this the 10th day of March, 2016.

_____________________________ Michael A. Lazzara, Chairman

Subscribed and sworn to me this ____ day of _______________ 2016.

_________________________________ Notary Public

My commission expires ___________________________________.


Action Required

To: Technical Coordinating Committee From: Peggy Holland, Senior Transportation Planner Subject: Draft P4.0 Local Prioritization Input Methodology

2/11/2016

The prioritization process for the selection of projects for the FY 2018-2027 State Transportation Improvement Program is known as P4.0, which establishes the quantitative scoring criteria. This score accounts for 70% of Regional Impact projects and 50% of Division Needs projects. The remainder of the score comes from local input, divided equally between the MPO and the Division Engineer. The methodology used by the MPO to assign its local points, as required by state law, is a combination of quantitative and qualitative criteria. The MPO received conditional approval of its methodology from NCDOT on January 11. Public review and comment is open from January 29 – March 1. Recommended Action: Recommend adoption of the draft Local Prioritization Input

Methodology Attachment: Draft P4.0 Local Prioritization Input Methodology

March 10, 2016 1

Jacksonville Urban Area MPO P4.0 Local Prioritization Input Methodology

The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) are federally required programming documents that depict phases (preliminary engineering, right-of-way acquisition, construction) of transportation projects by fiscal year and funding source. The project selection process is governed by the North Carolina Strategic Transportation Investments bill which was signed into law on June 26, 2013. The law provides a new way to fund and prioritize transportation projects to ensure the maximum benefit to our state. The FY 18-27 STIP/TIP prioritization process, known as P4.0, is driven by data and local input, with all modes competing for funding. The formula breaks projects into three categories: Statewide Mobility (Interstate, National Highway System, Strategic Highway Network, Major Airports), Regional Impact (All other US and NC Routes, Regional Airports) and Division Needs (All other state roadways, General Aviation Airports, Bicycle & Pedestrian, Transit). Highway projects not funded in their primary category are eligible to cascade to a lower level to compete for funding. Additional information on Strategic Transportation Investments is available at www.ncdot.gov/strategictransportationinvestments/. State Law 2012-84 requires the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) approval of MPO local prioritization input methodologies. Session Law 2013-183 requires these methodologies to include both qualitative and quantitative measures. Guidance from NCDOT dictates that no one measure shall determine more than 50% or less than 10% of the local prioritization input score. The MPO will use the same criteria for assigning local prioritization input points for all modes. As part of the P4.0 transportation prioritization process, local prioritization input points at the Regional Impact and Division Needs levels are split evenly between the MPO and the Division Engineer. The Jacksonville Urban Area MPO (JUMPO) will assign local points for Regional (15% of total score) and Division (25% of total score) project categories once the final data-driven P4.0 quantitative scores are generated. The MPO has 1,300 points to assign to projects within each respective category (Regional Impact and Division Needs) and will use the following methodology and the merits of the projects to assign points. The points assigned in each category cover all modes: aviation, bicycle & pedestrian, highway, transit. A maximum of 100 points may be assigned to any one project. The JUMPO P4.0 Local Prioritization Input Methodology is based upon guidance from NCDOT and dialogue with the MPO’s Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) Prioritization Subcommittee. Public comment will be solicited on this methodology in accordance with the adopted JUMPO Public Participation Plan prior to adoption by the MPO Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) in March 2016. All final project rankings, points assigned per project and any rationale/justification for point adjustments which deviate from this methodology will be available on the MPO website in May 2016 for the Regional Impact category and in September 2016 for the Division Needs category. NCDOT final project scores will be released in fall 2016 and the draft FY 2018-2027 STIP will be available for public review and comment prior to end of 2016.

March 10, 2016 2

Local Prioritization Input Methodology

Criteria Community Importance Assessment – 40 points maximum This criterion allows local discretion, based upon public comment and TAC concurrence, to determine the relative importance of proposed projects to the community and categorize them accordingly. Local knowledge of the merits of proposed projects has been deemed to carry considerable weight in the distribution of preliminary points.

In accordance with the metropolitan planning process, input on proposed transportation projects will be solicited by following outreach strategies contained within the adopted JUMPO Public Participation Plan. These include the use of the MPO website (www.jumpo-nc.gov), social media, newspaper advertising and a public forum.

o Project listings of all modes will be published in spring (potentially April-May) 2016 on the MPO website, along with a survey to allow the public to comment on and categorize submitted projects The survey will ask respondents to rate projects on a 1 to 5 scale based on

their level of support Final survey compilation will provide a score from 1 to 5 for each project

o Comments may also be received from the public by writing, telephone, social media, or in person, either at the public forum or in the MPO office

All modes will be combined and project scores will be stratified into quintiles. Points will be awarded as follows:

o Fifth quintile - 40 points o Fourth quintile - 30 points o Third quintile - 20 points o Second quintile - 10 points o First quintile - 0 points

Feedback from the public, including the public prioritization categorizations, will be provided to the TCC and TAC for consideration.

Project Readiness – 30 points maximum This criterion encourages local preference scoring based on the ability to construct or implement the project in a timely fashion. All modes are evaluated using the same criteria. In order to compare the different processes, the basis for point distribution will be on the project’s readiness for construction or implementation.

Projects are assigned points based upon status within the project development process o A project’s readiness for construction/implementation will be reflected in the points

it will receive (completion of design, environmental reviews, right-of-way, etc.) o The project sponsor will provide current status, project timeline, and an anticipated

implementation date If unavailable, planning level dates from the current TIP or LRTP will be

used o Projects that are conceptual will not receive points

March 10, 2016 3

Projects will be listed in descending order by date of readiness o Projects within 8 years of construction/implementation - 30 points o Projects within 9-12 years of construction/implementation - 15 points o Projects beyond 12 years of construction/implementation - 0 points

P4.0 Quantitative Score – 30 points maximum This criterion encourages local prioritization scores that work with, not against, P4.0 quantitative results. The P4.0 quantitative score accounts for 70% of Regional Impact and 50% of Division Needs project scores and represents a significant portion of the prioritization process. Local prioritization scores that do not align with P4.0 quantitative results could be counterproductive for funding projects.

The P4.0 data driven score will determine the number of points assigned All modes will be combined and projects will be listed in descending order of P4.0 scores Points will be assigned proportionally

o Fourth quartile - 30 points o Third quartile - 20 points o Second quartile - 10 points o First quartile - 0 points

Point Assignment Process

Preliminary Local Prioritization Input Points The criteria scores will be calculated for each project and become the basis for the TAC to assign the local prioritization input points to the top projects. These top scoring projects will each receive 100 local prioritization input points.

The prioritized listing with preliminary local prioritization input point assignment (including raw scores) will be publicized using the JUMPO Public Participation Plan to obtain public comment

o Regional Impact category in April - May 2016 o Division Needs category in August - September 2016

The P4.0 scores and Division Engineer assigned local prioritization input points will also be available to the public at the same times for their review through NCDOT’s websites.

Final Local Prioritization Input Points The local prioritization input points for each project will be finalized after public comments have been received and coordination with the Division Engineer. The TAC will direct the final award of local prioritization input points into the P4.0 prioritization process and may, at the board’s discretion, award less than 100 points on a project in order to increase the number of projects receiving local prioritization input points. A total of 1,300 points to projects in the Regional Impact category will be submitted no later than the end of May 2016 or as directed by NCDOT. A total of 1,300 points to projects in the Division Needs category will be submitted no later than the end of September 2016 or as directed by NCDOT.

RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING

ORGANIZATION PRIORITIZATION 4.0 LOCAL INPUT POINT ASSIGNMENT

A motion was made by TAC Member ___________________________________ and seconded by TAC Member _____________________________________ for adoption of the following resolution, and upon being put to a vote was duly adopted. WHEREAS, a new method of funding and prioritizing transportation projects to ensure maximum benefit to our state was enacted when the Strategic Transportation Investments program was signed into law on June 26, 2013; and

WHEREAS, prioritization (also known as Prioritization 4.0, or P4.0) is primarily a data-driven process, involving local assignment of points for projects in the Regional Impact and Division Needs funding categories by the Jacksonville MPO; and

WHEREAS, the Jacksonville MPO developed a P4.0 Local Prioritization Input Methodology, which complies with state law and NCDOT guidance; and

WHEREAS, the preliminary P4.0 Local Input Points for all projects were published for public comment on January 29, 2016; and

WHEREAS, all public comments were duly considered and prioritization was coordinated with Division 3; and

WHEREAS, the final assignment of P4.0 Local Input Points (Exhibit A) has been made to enhance the greatest likelihood of future funding in the State Transportation Improvement Program for projects that improve the mobility of our region.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Jacksonville Urban Area Transportation Advisory Committee that the final assignment of Local Input Points is compliant with the Jacksonville MPO Local Prioritization Input Methodology and hereby adopted, this the 10th day of March, 2016.

_____________________________ Michael A. Lazzara, Chairman

_________________________________ Anthony Prinz, TAC Secretary

Documents

AGENDA - JUMPO€¦ · Ms. Peggy Holland, Mr. Roy Bredahl, Ms. Stephanie Kutz, Mr. Tim Akers, Mr. Patrick Flanagan, Mr. Chris White , Mr. Ron Lucas I. Call to Order Mr. Ben Warren