LakeEmma

DeerLake

BuffaloLake

LakePulaski

LakeFrancis

LakeSylvia

GraniteLake

RamseyLake

LakeMary

PleasantLake

ClearwaterLake

EagleLake

MaryLake

LakeSugar

CedarLake

MinkLake

LakeJohnTwin

Lake

PelicanLake

MapleLake

FrenchLake

BeebeLake

DeanLake

CokatoLake

HowardLake

WaverlyLake

SmithLake

LittleWaverlyLake

LakeAnn

CollinwoodLake

C

learwaterRiver

Miss issippi River

Mississippi River

Crow Riv e

r

North Fork Crow River

South

ForkCrowRiver

CrowRiver

3131 3636

31 3631 36

6

31 36

16

31 36

16

31 3631 36

1616

3136

16

31 36

16

31 36

16

31 36

16

31 36

616

31 36

16

31 36

16

31 36

16

31 36

16

31 36

16

31 36

16

31 36

16

31 36

36

16 6

31

6

31

31

1

31

6

R28W

T118N

T119N

T120N

T121N

R28W

T122N

R27W

R26W

T122N

R25W

R24W

R23W

T121N

R23W

T120N

R24W

T119N

T118N

R25WR26WR27W

DELANO

WAVERLY

HOWARDLAKE

COKATO

ROCKFORD

BUFFALO

MAPLELAKE

ANNANDALE

MONTICELLO

94 00 00W94 15 00W

45 00 00 N

45 15 00 N

45 00 00 N

45 15 00 N

93 45 00W

93 45 00W

94 30 00W

MeekerCo.

StearnsCo.

Carver Co.McLeod Co.

HennepinCo.

Sherburne Co.

POTENTIAL AGGREGATE RESOURCES: Those geologic units that are inferred tocontain potentially significant aggregate deposits. Gravel pit symbols andMN/DOT-aggregate symbols indicate identified resources. The geologic unitshaving potential for aggregate resources include terrace outwash, outwash,collapsed outwash, and ice-contact deposits.

LIMITED POTENTIAL FOR AGGREGATE RESOURCES: Those geologic units thatgenerally have little or no potential for aggregate resources. In places,includes aggregate deposits either too small, or extremely difficult to map.

Gravel pit - Locations gathered from several sources. In places, single symbolsindicate multiple gravel pits. May be active, inactive, depleted or reclaimed.

MN/DOT-identified aggregate source - Test hole logs, sieve and quality test dataavailable. Typically include gravel pits.

ORGANIC DEPOSITS: Peat and organic-rich silt and clay, ranging from 3 togreater than 20 feet thick, overlying surrounding or immediately adjacentunit(s). In places includes small bodies of water.

WATER: Lake or river.

AGGREGATE RESOURCES

WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA

0 1 2 3 4 Miles

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kilometers

SCALE 1:100,000

Base map: Roads and hydrography from U.S. Geological Survey, 1:100,000 Digital Line Graphs (DLGs)

Public Land Survey lines from Land Management Information Center, annotation from MN Department of Natural Resources

Geology: Aerial photo interpretation and field mapping by J.D. Lehr, 1988-1989

Aggregate resources: Modified from digital data associated with Lehr, J.D., 1991, Aggregate Resources and Quaternary Geology,

Wright County, Minnesota, Report 294, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals.

This information is available in an alternative format upon request.

An equal opportunity employer

Minnesota

DEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCES

Department of Natural Resources

Division of Minerals

William C. Brice, Director

1997, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources