Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Recent findings as regards Recent findings as regards T2 and HTT2 and HT--2 toxin in 2 toxin in cerealscereals
"Agricultural Contaminants – Fusarium Forum“
Brussels, February 9-10, 2009
Institute Institute ofof ChemicalChemical Technology, Technology, PraguePrague, CZ, [email protected]
Jana Jana HajslovaHajslova
ML ML forforTT--2 / HT2 / HT--2 2
??
Research Research projectproject TT--2 2 andand HT in HT in foodfoodcropscrops
in collaboration with Agricultural Research Institute Kromeriz, CZ
LocalitiesLocalities: :
ŽŽababččiceice, Krom, Kroměřěříížž
BarleyBarley varietiesvarieties::
Amulet, Bojos, Jersey, Malz, Prestige, Sebastian, Tolar, Merlin, KM 1057, KM 1910, KM 2084, KM 2283
Are Are therethere alsoalso trichothecenestrichothecenes A A in in beebeerr ??
Beer is the main Czech foodcommodity... Are Are theretheremaskedmasked myotoxinsmyotoxins in in beerbeer??
……DON is frequently found in commercial beers, originating from malt or from grain adjuncts
FATE OFFATE OF FUSARIUM FUSARIUM MYCOTOXINS MYCOTOXINS DURING MALTING PROCESSDURING MALTING PROCESS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
myc
otox
in ( µ
g/kg
)
BARLEY I. II. III. I. II. GREENMALT
I. II. MALT ROOTS
STEEPING GERMINATION KILNING
DON-3-GluDON ADONsHT-2
DONDON--33--GLU = 460 GLU = 460 µµg/kgg/kgDON = 553 DON = 553 µµg/kgg/kg
ADONsADONs = 571 = 571 µµg/kgg/kgHTHT--2 = 1061 2 = 1061 µµg/kgg/kg
FATE OFFATE OF FUSARIUMFUSARIUM MYCOTOXINSMYCOTOXINSDURING BREWING PROCESS DURING BREWING PROCESS
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
myc
otox
in ( µ
g/l b
eer)
BARLEYMALT
SPENTGRAINS
SWEETWORT
FIRSTWORT
SECONDWORT
WARMWORT
WORTAFTERTRUB
REMOVAL
GREENBEER
BEER
DON-3-Glu
DON
ADONs
HT-2
Type A Type A andand B B trichothecenestrichothecenes inin barleybarley, , harvestharvest 2008, 2008, llocality Kroměříž
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Con
trol
Pros
aro
Swin
gA
mis
tar
Con
trol
Pros
aro
Swin
gA
mis
tar
Con
trol
Pros
aro
Swin
gA
mis
tar
Con
trol
Pros
aro
Swin
gA
mis
tar
DON HT2 T2
prepre--cropcrop influenceinfluencevariety variety influenceinfluencefungicide influencefungicide influence
fungicidefungicide
cereal
maize
cereal
maize
SebastianSebastian PrestigePrestige
C (µ
g/kg
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Žabčice locality
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
amul
et
bojo
s
jers
ey
km10
57
km 191
0
km 208
4
km 228
3
malz
mer
lin
pres
tige
seba
stian
tolar
Kroměříž locality
Fusarium mycotoxins in Fusarium mycotoxins in springspring barleybarley, 2008, 2008
NIVNIVDONDONHTHT--22TT--22
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
050
100150200250300350400450500550600
Amulet
Bojos
Jers
ey
KM 105
7
KM 191
0
KM 208
4
KM 228
3
Malz
Mer
lin
Pres
tige
Seba
stian
Tolar
NIVNIVDONDONHTHT--22TT--22
20082008
20072007
Fusarium Fusarium toxinstoxins in in springspring barleybarley, 2008 , 2008 vsvs 20072007locality Zabcice
HTHT--2 2 contamination in barleycontamination in barley
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Con
trol
Pro
saro
Sw
ing
Am
ista
r
Con
trol
Pro
saro
Sw
ing
Am
ista
r
Con
trol
Pro
saro
Sw
ing
Am
ista
r
Con
trol
Pro
saro
Sw
ing
Am
ista
r
Sebastian Sebastian Prestige Prestige
c (µ
g/kg
)
pre-crop influence / variety influence / fungicide influence
maize cereal
TT--2 2 contamination in barleycontamination in barley
pre-crop influence / variety influence / fungicide influence
maize cereal
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Con
trol
Pro
saro
Sw
ing
Am
ista
r
Con
trol
Pro
saro
Sw
ing
Am
ista
r
Con
trol
Pro
saro
Sw
ing
Am
ista
r
Con
trol
Pro
saro
Sw
ing
Am
ista
r
Sebastian Sebastian Prestige Prestige
c (µ
g/kg
)
DON v uměle infikovaném ječmeni
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Kon
trol
a
Pros
aro
Swin
g
Am
ista
r
Kon
trol
a
Pros
aro
Swin
g
Am
ista
r
Kon
trol
a
Pros
aro
Swin
g
Am
ista
r
Kon
trol
a
Pros
aro
Swin
g
Am
ista
r
Sebastian Prestige Sebastian Prestige
kukuřice obilovina
c (µ
g/kg
)
maize cereal
DON DON contaminationcontamination in barleyin barley• pre-crop influence• variety influence• fungicide influence
Con
trol
Con
trol
Con
trol
Con
trol
D3G v uměle infikovaném ječmeni
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Kon
trol
a
Pros
aro
Swin
g
Am
ista
r
Kon
trol
a
Pros
aro
Swin
g
Am
ista
r
Kon
trol
a
Pros
aro
Swin
g
Am
ista
r
Kon
trol
a
Pros
aro
Swin
g
Am
ista
r
Sebastian Prestige Sebastian Prestige
kukuřice obilovina
c (µ
g/kg
)
maize cereal
DONDON--33--GlcGlc contaminationcontamination in barleyin barley• pre-crop influence• variety influence• fungicide influence
Con
trol
Con
trol
Con
trol
Con
trol
HT
HT- -2 toxin in
2 toxin in oatoat(2008)
(2008)
HT-2 toxin
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90100
VeliAbel
AvenudaAtegoPogonSaulSaloIzak
NeklanFlamingsprofi
VeliAbel
AvenudaAtegoPogonSaulSaloIzak
NeklanFlamingsprofi
VeliAbel
AvenudaAtegoPogonSaulSaloIzak
NeklanFlamingsprofi
řepkaobilovina
kukuřice
c (µg/kg)
rapecereals
maize
pre-cropinfluence
severalvarieties
T-2 toxin
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90100
VeliAbel
AvenudaAtegoPogonSaulSaloIzak
NeklanFlamingsprofi
VeliAbel
AvenudaAtegoPogonSaulSaloIzak
NeklanFlamingsprofi
VeliAbel
AvenudaAtegoPogonSaulSaloIzak
NeklanFlamingsprofi
řepkaobilovina
kukuřice
c (µg/kg)
rapecereals
maize
pre-cropinfluence
severalvarieties
T T- -2 toxin in 2 toxin in oat
oat(2008)(2008)
DON
0 20 40 60 80
100
120
140
VeliAbel
AvenudaAtegoPogonSaulSaloIzak
NeklanFlamingsprofi
VeliAbel
AvenudaAtegoPogonSaulSaloIzak
NeklanFlamingsprofi
VeliAbel
AvenudaAtegoPogonSaulSaloIzak
NeklanFlamingsprofi
řepkaobilovina
kukuřice
c (µg/kg)
rapecereals
maize
DO
N in
DO
N in oat
oat(2008)(2008)
pre-cropinfluence
severalvarieties
Analytical methods for determination of HTAnalytical methods for determination of HT--2 and T2 and T--2 2 toxins in cerealstoxins in cereals: : cleanclean--up of samplesup of samples
SPE columns IA columns
MycoSep
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MycoSep MycoSep +isotope
IA Vicam IA R-Biopharm
MycoSep MycoSep +isotope
IA Vicam IA R-Biopharm
HT-2 T-2
%
HT-2 T-2
Barley was artificially spiked on level 100 ng/g by both toxins
Recovery for various cleanRecovery for various clean--up steps of barley samplesup steps of barley samples
What is the correlation of T-2 and HT-2 toxin levelswith the presence of other Fusarium-toxins, mainlyDON?
What are the sources of / causes for observedvariation in occurrence of T-2 and HT-2?
What is the fate of -2 and HT-2 toxins duringcereals processing ?
Proposals for mittigation strategies?
What is the quality of data generated on T-2 and HT-2 levels?
QUESTIONS TO BE INVESTIGATED / ANSWEREDQUESTIONS TO BE INVESTIGATED / ANSWERED