24
Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of the energy consumption method Hermann Auernhammer Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephan Germany Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (1) © 2005 International Agricultural Engineering Conference Bangkok, Thailand December 6 - 9, 2005 Crop Production Engineering

Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of the energy

consumption method

Hermann Auernhammer

Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephan

Germany

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (1)© 2005

International Agricultural Engineering ConferenceBangkok, Thailand

December 6 - 9, 2005

Crop Production Engineering

Page 2: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Nostalgic agricultural work (The Harvesters, Bruegel 1565)

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (2)© 2005

Page 3: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Still some manual work in agriculture forces a high work load

Measurement can be done with the heart rate method and others

Methods and Materials

Feeding processes in aloose housing system

Rel

. to

cont

inuo

us p

ower

rat

ing

loose housing system

Continuouspower rating

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (3)© 2005

FeedingPreparation

ofmilking

Moveof

forage

MilkingGoto

barn

Working durationmin

Rel

. to

cont

inuo

us p

ower

rat

ing

Page 4: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Still some manual work in agriculture forces a high work load

Measurement can be done under real conditions with the heart rate method and others

But for planning purposes we need an evaluation method

Methods and Materials

But for planning purposes we need an evaluation method

• to improve the work process at all

• to reduce the work load above the continuous power rating

• to detect the work sequences with a to high work load

• to substitute those sequences with alternative technologies

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (4)© 2005

• to substitute those sequences with alternative technologies

Page 5: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Energy consumption of working postures and types of work

Working posture

SittingKneeingCrochingStandingDucked standing

Reasonable energy consumptionacross a working day

Male 8.500 kJ/8h = 17.3 kJ/minFemale 5.500 kJ/8h = 11.4 kJ/min2.5

kJ/min

1.03.05.0

4.0Ducked standingWalkingMoving up/down

Type of Work

Simple handworkMedium handworkHaevy handworkSimple one arm workMedium one arm workHaevy one arm work

1.0 - 1.8 - 2.52.5 - 3.3 - 4.04.0 - 4.8 - 5.52.5 - 3.8 - 5.05.0 - 6.3 - 7.57.5 - 8.8 - 10.0

kJ/min

4.07.0

3,0 per meter

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (5)© 2005

Source: Hettinger und Spitzer, 1982

Haevy one arm workSimple two arm workMedium two arm workHaevy two arm workSimple body workMedium body workHaevy body workVery haevy body work

7.5 - 8.8 - 10.06.0 - 7.3 - 8.58.5 - 9.8 - 11.011.0 - 12.3 - 13.511.0 - 14.0 - 17.017.0 - 21.0 - 25.025.0 - 30.0 - 35.035.0 - 42.5 - 50.0

Page 6: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Basic model structure for “Work Time Calculation” in LISL

(LISL = Landwirtschaftliches Informations- System Landtechnik)

Technology ∑=

=n

iVGGA i

tt1

Process 1

Sub process 1 Sub process n

Process n

∑=

=n

iELTV i

tt1

∑=

=n

iTVVG i

tt1

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (6)© 2005

Time element 1 Time element 2 Time element 3 Time element ... Time element ... Time element ... Time element n∑=

⋅+=n

iELELELEL ii

xbat1

=i 1

Page 7: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Document structure in LISLPart 1 Title

Measurement pointsAuthor(s)Modifications

Part 2 Work contentWork flowWork flowRestrictions

Part 3 ParametersNumber of parametersParameter definitionDefault value of parametersDimension

Part 6 Work element with statistics / Sub model concatenat ioneither Mean / Regression

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (7)© 2005

either Mean / Regressionwith: Distrubution

ProbabilityTest valuesTransformations (log)

or Concatenation ruleswith: Calculated parameters

Number of sub modelsParameters of sub model

Part 7: Energy consumption with- Working posture (partly)- Working type (partly)- Energy consumption

!

Page 8: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Dokument-Inn 100900 11. 7.05 12 0 0 0

PL 100900 Walking without load (load < 20kg) 0

Beginning: Lift foot for first step

End: Hit the ground with foot after last step

Created: 01.06.77 by H.Auernhammer, J.Reinholz, H.Zaeh

------------------------ end of section ------------------------

Content...

Document of process element „walking without load“ in LISL

Working posture

SittingKneeingCrochingStandingDucked standing

Content...

Walking with loads of max. 20kg.

------------------------ end of section ------------------------

Changeable variables = 2

1. Frequency 1.0 0

2. Walking distance 20.0 Meter 0

------------------------ end of section ------------------------

Data acquisition scheme for 1 mandatory and 0 exploratory variable

1. Walking dist Meter 25-29 1 0 1.00 - 350.00

------------------------ end of section ------------------------

Function 2652 measured values with 1 factors.; supplement = .90%;

Ducked standingWalkingMoving up/down

Type of Work

Simple handworkMedium handworkHaevy handworkSimple one arm workMedium one arm workHaevy one arm workSimple two arm workMedium two arm work

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (8)© 2005

Function 2652 measured values with 1 factors.; supplement = .90%;

B =.928 average-Y = 29.0 S= .700 F=3433.0

Distance 19.900 1.3113 .0060 225.863 .975 .000 .964

------------------------ End of section ------------------------

Work load function

Energy-pastur 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 11.0

Energy-worktype 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 14.8

---------------------- End of document ------------------------ end

Posture

Work type

Medium two arm workHaevy two arm workSimple body workMedium body workHaevy body workVery haevy body work

∑=

⋅⋅=n

iELELELEL iii

tcre1

Page 9: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Work time calculation in LISL

Final model results (milking with a pipeline milking system)

Result of calculation for a stock size of 15 animals

Time consumption per animal an day 7.9 Mmin = 0.13 MhTime consumption per day and stock size 119.0 Mmin = 1.98 Mh

* **

Average work load from energy consumption 15.9 kJ/minRel. work load “female” (11.4 kJ/min) 139.8 %Rel. work load “male” (17.3 kJ/min) 92.1 %

Working duration per day 119.0 Mmin = 1.98 Mh

Rearing period of 365 daysTime consumption per animal and period 48.3 MhTime consumption for full stock and period 723.8 Mh

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (9)© 2005

* Mmin = Man minutes** Mh = Man hours

Page 10: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Model: VG 207 Milking in a tied-up stall with bucket milking systemTV 2070 General preparation work for milkingEL 20700 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.132EL 20001 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.125PL 100905 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.090EL 20701 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.166EL 20702 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.357TV 2071 preperation work for milking in a tied-up stallPL 100441 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.000...

Example of a work load file in LISL

...EL 20712 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000EL 20717 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.383TV 2072 Milking in a tied-up stall with bucket milking systemEL 20720 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.190EL 21701 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.760...EL 20722 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.109EL 20723 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 10.656EL 20724 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.370TV 2073 Finishing work after milking in a tied-up stallEL 20732 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.090PL 100919 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.277...Rel. share 0.0 0.0 20.4 44.0 12.3 23.3 0.0 0.5 5.4 0.0 11.5 1.7 1.1 10.0 40.4 11.5 0.0 17.9 0.0 0.0 59.500

Type of Work

Simple handworkMedium handwork

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (10)© 2005

Rel. share 0.0 0.0 20.4 44.0 12.3 23.3 0.0 0.5 5.4 0.0 11.5 1.7 1.1 10.0 40.4 11.5 0.0 17.9 0.0 0.0 59.500TotaltimeType of workWorking posture

100%100%

Working posture

SittingKneeingCrochingStandingDucked standingWalkingMoving up/down

Medium handworkHaevy handworkSimple one arm workMedium one arm workHaevy one arm workSimple two arm workMedium two arm workHaevy two arm workSimple body workMedium body workHaevy body workVery haevy body work

Page 11: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Rel. shares of working postures and types of work

Bucket milking system

0 20 40 60 80 100

Sitting

Kneeing

Rel. share [%]

!Croching

Standing

Stoop standing

Walking

Aceding

Simple handwork

Medium handwork

Haevy handwork

Simple one arm work

Medium one arm work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture !

!

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (11)© 2005

Haevy one arm work

Simple two arm work

Medium two arm work

Haevy two arm work

Simple body work

Medium body work

Haevy body work

Very haevy body work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

Page 12: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

22

24

26

28

Distinguished energy consumption profile

Bucket milking system

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

[kJ/

min

]

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (12)© 2005

0

2

4

6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150Working time [min]

Energy consumptionAverage energy consumption

Energy consumption threshold ‚male‘Energy consumption threshold ‚female‘

Page 13: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Rel. shares of working postures and types of work

Pipeline milking system

0 20 40 60 80 100

Sitting

Kneeing

Rel. share [%]

!!Kneeing

Croching

Standing

Stoop standing

Walking

Aceding

Simple handwork

Medium handwork

Haevy handwork

Simple one arm work

Medium one arm work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture !!

!

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (13)© 2005

Haevy one arm work

Simple two arm work

Medium two arm work

Haevy two arm work

Simple body work

Medium body work

Haevy body work

Very haevy body work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

Page 14: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

22

24

26

28

Distinguished energy consumption profile

Pipeline milking system

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

[kJ/

min

]

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (14)© 2005

0

2

4

6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150Working time [min]

Energy consumptionAverage energy consumption

Energy consumption threshold ‚male‘Energy consumption threshold ‚female‘

Page 15: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Rel. shares of working postures and types of work

Herringbone milking parlour

0 20 40 60 80 100

Sitting

Kneeing

Rel. share [%]

Croching

Standing

Stoop standing

Walking

Aceding

Simple handwork

Medium handwork

Haevy handwork

Simple one arm work

Medium one arm work

Haevy one arm work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

!

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (15)© 2005

Haevy one arm work

Simple two arm work

Medium two arm work

Haevy two arm work

Simple body work

Medium body work

Haevy body work

Very haevy body work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

!

Page 16: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

22

24

26

28

Distinguished energy consumption profile

Herringbone milking parlour

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

[kJ/

min

]

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (16)© 2005

0

2

4

6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150Working time [min]

Energy consumptionAverage energy consumption

Energy consumption threshold ‚male‘Energy consumption threshold ‚female‘

Page 17: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Rel. shares of working postures and types of work

Rotary milking parlour

0 20 40 60 80 100

Sitting

Kneeing

Rel. share [%]

Croching

Standing

Stoop standing

Walking

Aceding

Simple handwork

Medium handwork

Haevy handwork

Simple one arm work

Medium one arm work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

!

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (17)© 2005

Haevy one arm work

Simple two arm work

Medium two arm work

Haevy two arm work

Simple body work

Medium body work

Haevy body work

Very haevy body work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

!

Page 18: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

22

24

26

28

Distinguished energy consumption profile

Rotary milking parlour

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

[kJ/

min

]

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (18)© 2005

0

2

4

6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150Working time [min]

Energy consumptionAverage energy consumption

Energy consumption threshold ‚male‘Energy consumption threshold ‚female‘

Page 19: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Rel. shares of working postures and types of work

Slurry spreading

0 20 40 60 80 100

Sitting

Kneeing

Rel. share [%]

!Croching

Standing

Stoop standing

Walking

Aceding

Simple handwork

Medium handwork

Haevy handwork

Simple one arm work

Medium one arm work

Haevy one arm work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (19)© 2005

Haevy one arm work

Simple two arm work

Medium two arm work

Haevy two arm work

Simple body work

Medium body work

Haevy body work

Very haevy body work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

Page 20: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

22

24

26

28

Distinguished energy consumption profile

Slurry spreading

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

[kJ/

min

]

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (20)© 2005

0

2

4

6

0 5 10 15 20Working time [min]

Energy consumptionAverage energy consumption

Energy consumption threshold ‚male‘Energy consumption threshold ‚female‘

Page 21: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Rel. shares of working postures and types of work

Muck out in pig farming

0 20 40 60 80 100

Sitting

Kneeing

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

Rel. share [%]

Croching

Standing

Stoop standing

Walking

Aceding

Simple handwork

Medium handwork

Haevy handwork

Simple one arm work

Medium one arm work

Haevy one arm work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

!

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (21)© 2005

Haevy one arm work

Simple two arm work

Medium two arm work

Haevy two arm work

Simple body work

Medium body work

Haevy body work

Very haevy body work

Typ

e of

wor

k

Wor

king

pos

ture

!

Page 22: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

22

24

26

28

Distinguished energy consumption profile

Muck out in pig farming

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

[kJ/

min

]

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (22)© 2005

0

2

4

6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60Working time [min]

Energy consumptionAverage energy consumption

Energy consumption threshold ‚male‘Energy consumption threshold ‚female‘

Page 23: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Rel. shares in different milking systems

Unfavourable working postures and energy consumption above thresholds

Pig farmingMilking system Pig farming

Bucket Pipeline Herringbone Rotary Muck out

15 dairy cows 20 dairy cows 60 dairy cows 100 dairy cows 30 sows

2 milking units 3 milking units 2x5 milking units 13 milking units Litter

Unfavourable working posture [%]

32.8 34.9 27.0 36.0 33.8

Unfavourable type of work [%]

12.6 4.4 0.7 0.9 31.5

Over female energy

Milking system

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (23)© 2005

Over female energy consumption threshold [%]

77.0 75.3 76.7 87.7 72.1

Over male energyconsumption threshold [%]

29.5 3.1 0.0 0.0 64.0

Page 24: Agricultural working posture and work load assessment by use of … · Working posture Sitting Kneeing Croching Standing Ducked standing Walking Moving up/down Haevy handwork Simple

Conclusions

1. Several working procedures in agriculture cause a high or even to high work load

2. With the energy consumption model from HETTINGER & SPITZER working postures, types of work and the consumption of energycan be analyzed can be analyzed

3. Based on a detailed work time calculation system like LISL working postures, types of work and energy consumpt ion profiles along the working duration can been predicted

4. For different milking systems these method shows impressive results

Auernhammer, 16.07.2005 A05-18 (24)© 2005

5. The use of this method in extension as well as in the education of students gives an additional benefit of work time calculations and it opens the eyes for labour improvements