5
AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011 PALF Performance Accountability Learning Framework

AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011 PALF Performance Accountability Learning Framework

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011 PALF Performance Accountability Learning Framework

AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011

PALFPerformance Accountability Learning

Framework

Page 2: AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011 PALF Performance Accountability Learning Framework

AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011

• AGM

• Competency Framework

• Based on UK Model – Integrated Competency Framework

• IT based system – currently being developed

• Role holder puts on system evidence of competency achieved and does this for all competencies in advance of formal meeting

• Supervisor checks this and verifies/rejects same

• All competencies are discussed, strengths highlighted weakness recognised and action plans put in place

• Applies to all

• Appeals process

Page 3: AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011 PALF Performance Accountability Learning Framework

AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011

How it works

Local Policing Plan

Team PerformanceAnnual Team Review

(Team Leader and Manager)

I ndividual PerformanceAnnual Review of

I ndividual Performance and Development

(Role Holder and Line Manager)

I ndividual PerformanceI nterim Review of

I ndividual Performance and Development

(Role Holder and Line Manager)

Page 4: AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011 PALF Performance Accountability Learning Framework

AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011

What supervisors will be expected to do

• Clarifying performance expectations

• Monitoring and assessing performance of all individuals

• Giving effective feedback

• Correcting performance shortfalls

• Developing people to their full potential

• Engage in team review

• Subjects oneself to the same process with own first line supervisor.

Page 5: AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011 PALF Performance Accountability Learning Framework

AGSI Autumn Seminar - Nov 2011

ConcernsAdoption of a model from elsewhere

Over emphasis on informal training and development Coaching/Mentoring

Administrative workloadTime for process

Fiscal climate ignoredStand alone process

Lack of formal trainingDoes not address motivation

Lack of sanctions for non performanceSenior Management buy in

Compensation